Re: Siemens MC35i: send command status: -1
Hi Lars, You might wanna try to reset your modem before anything in your init-string, something like ATZ+CNMI... or ATZAT+CNMI I am not sure. I never tried to use kannel that way, but at least when I was using laptop dialup with mobile phones in either GSM, HSCD or GPRS I always had to use ATZ in the init string to make it work. HTH Stephane -- Stephane Rosa Security Officer Network Engineer, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Lars-Hendrik Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20-02-2006 13:37 To Kannel users@kannel.org cc Subject Re: Siemens MC35i: send command status: -1 Hi Paul, Lars-Hendrik Schneider schrieb: Hi Paul Paul Keogh schrieb: ###snip# group = modems id = siemens_mc35 name = Siemens MC35 detect-string = SIEMENS detect-string2 = MC35 init-string = AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,1 speed = 57600 enable-hwhs = AT\\Q3 need-sleep = true # uncomment this line if needed ###/snip# I would always add the alt-dcs=1 Parameter to the SMSC group definition when using a Siemens modem. Its worth a try. thanks, I will try it soon and publish the result here. AFAIR this problem was mentioned in the mailing list several times without a solution, so that every helpor hint is appreciated. Greetz from Bonn, Lars-Hendrik well, it seems as this did not solve my problem, but it (currently) seems as if the modems are now running. I changed my modems.conf a little bit following this posting: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@kannel.3glab.org/msg01308.html saying: ###snip# After trying kannel at 6 different machines, I've found out that kannel is quite messy with initializing a serial port. [modem TC-35 Siemens]. Under Solaris this is quite a tricky to achieve, and under linux it is little bit easier (minicom trick). Another strange thing is that 1.1.6 is not working with at2 smsc, but with old at it is working If I use old at under Solaris, then it works, but receiving messages is not possible. I think this is problem with init strings... For TC-35 it needs to be first: AT+CSMS=1 , and then this one will work... AT+CNMI=3,2,0,0,1 otherwise I get error with AT+CNMI command, since without CSMS=1 , TC-35 does not accept anthying else than AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,1 (not 100%, this is from head). Anyway, after making kannel work after couple of inits and shutdowns, problem with initializing is occuring again after rebooting machine... Does anybody know solution for this? I've tried even setting up a port with stty, but this is still not 100% reliable. ###/snip# This is what my kannel.conf NOW looks alike (running with kannel 1.4.0): ###snip# group = smsc smsc = at smsc-id = GSM1 modemtype = siemens_mc35 device = /dev/gsm1 pin = 9797 sms-center = +49176443 alt-dcs=1 group = modems id = siemens_mc35 name = Siemens MC35 detect-string = SIEMENS detect-string2 = MC35 init-string = AT+CNMI=1,2,0,0,1 init-string = AT+CSMS=1 speed = 57600 enable-hwhs = AT\\Q3 need-sleep = true # uncomment this line if needed ###/snip# Due to kannel 1.4.0 this uses smsc = at which is the same as at2 in former versions. Note this: init-string = AT+CSMS=1 -- I added this and it seems to work now (I hope it will go on like this. Therefore I will try to send a huge number of SMS using http-requests this afternoon and spamming my collegues...). if it fails again, I will answer here again... (hope I don't have to, puh). Greetings, Lars-Hendrik
Re: SMS Headers
As far as I can tell, yes and no. It would work only if the user is including the original message as the reply, and it means that the user will actually see this message ID somewhere in the message. Additionally, some phones are not proposing include on reply, although they usually all have a Forward function instead. I really wish there was some kind of link between an MO and MT but that's not part of current SMS specs. Maybe WAP push is a better option for that. Cheers Stephane -- Stephane Rosa Security Officer Network Engineer, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com David Wessell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 31-01-2006 13:24 To users@kannel.org cc Subject SMS Headers Hey all.. Is it possible to embed a message ID within a header, so that if a user replies, a thread can be maintained? As a secondary question, has anyone used a Motorola v400 with Kannel? Thanks David -- --- David Wessell
Re: RedHat 9 and Kannel 1.4.0 (Compile successful ^_^)
Heya, Sorry I haven't responded before you found a solution, I am catching up on email now. A better solution which does not force you to mess with current installation is to tell configure to use other include locations. You need to add --with-cflags='-g -I/usr/kerberos/include' in your configure command line. That'll make it. Hope it helps for next time (and for others) Cheers Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Buyung Arif Nugroho [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20-10-05 10:07 To users@kannel.org cc Subject Re: RedHat 9 and Kannel 1.4.0 (Compile successful ^_^) YES, i did it. The answer is quite simple, i feel kinda stupid T_T The problem was, rh9 didn't install the krb5-devel in the right place. They installed it in the '/usr/kerberos/include'. But openssl-devel (kssl.h) need to use the krb5-devel and looked in the '/usr/include'. Of course they didn't find it. My solution is to make hardlink (symlink doesn't work) for all the kerberos header inside '/usr/kerberos/include' to the '/usr/include' (doesn't need to include the subdir). E.g '#ln -v /usr/kerberos/include /usr/include'. And voila ^_^ Thanks guys for helping me out ^_^ Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Fw: is UCP 52 supported in the EMI connection ?
Hi, Could anybody help me in understanding what exactly the difference is between UCP 01 and UCP 52, and how I would be affected if UCP 52 is the only one accepted by my provider ? Is Kannel supporting it ? Thanks Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com - Forwarded by Stephane Rosa/MTX/Stryker on 18-10-05 11:29 - Stephane Rosa 17-08-05 10:04 To users@kannel.org cc Subject is UCP 52 supported in the EMI connection ? My SMSC is investigating the exclusive use of UCP 52 for MO. Until now they were using UCP 01 for normal text MO with max 160 chars, and UCP 52 for long MO, pictures, etc. Is Kannel supporting UCP 52 at all for MO ? I tried to send a long MO to a test service but it wasnt processed correctly : 2005-08-17 09:52:39 [31782] [4] INFO: Starting to service T from 004179xxx to 30xxx 2005-08-17 09:52:40 [31782] [4] INFO: Starting to service T from 004179xxx to 30xxx It was processed as two separate message and the %k which was ACK in the message was somehow understood as a graphical character by the service. Any advice appreciated. Thanks Stephane
RE: OOT: Reply-To header
Nope, sorry but reply to just replies to the sender, not the list. I usually Reply To All to get the list as well... In this particular email I added the list in the Cc manually... Cheers Stephane -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: OOT: Reply-To header Hey Steve, On 18 Aug 2005, at 9:36, Steve Kennedy wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:47:11PM +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote: Dear All, I suggest that this mailing list added Reply-To header it will help us to simply reply every message Why should mailing lists be set-up to keep broken mail clients happy? Any decent mail client will have the facility to reply to a list. Reply-to lists is just wrong, and can cause all sorts of problems for list admins etc. I must not be aware of something here. What problems does it cause? Every other list I list (including the kannel devel list) uses the list name when I press reply. Its normally what I want to do, reply to the list. Cheers, Gareth -- Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Embrace Mobile +44-1865-811197 http://www.embracemobile.com
is UCP 52 supported in the EMI connection ?
My SMSC is investigating the exclusive use of UCP 52 for MO. Until now they were using UCP 01 for normal text MO with max 160 chars, and UCP 52 for long MO, pictures, etc. Is Kannel supporting UCP 52 at all for MO ? I tried to send a long MO to a test service but it wasnt processed correctly : 2005-08-17 09:52:39 [31782] [4] INFO: Starting to service T from 004179xxx to 30xxx 2005-08-17 09:52:40 [31782] [4] INFO: Starting to service T from 004179xxx to 30xxx It was processed as two separate message and the %k which was ACK in the message was somehow understood as a graphical character by the service. Any advice appreciated. Thanks Stephane
RE: Question about tracking messages (maybe using UDH ?)
Hi Alejandro, Thanks for your reply. I'm a bit disappointed as I really thought that there would be some sort of persistent information between a message sent to a mobile and its reply. I think I can handle this missing feature by asking users to include the original message in their reply. A quick investigation showed up that on Nokia phones this functionality exists. On Ericsson it doesn't but the user can forward the message back, that should be ok to start with. Thus said, I would be very interested in investigating wap push for a near future, unfortunately I have pretty much no idea of how to set that up and the documentation is more a technical reference than a tutorial :-) If somebody would have a truly basic example of wap config and wap scripts that does any kind of simple job (even unrelated to the alerting system that I try to setup) to help me understand I would be glad. Thanks Stephane -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 13:53 To: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Question about tracking messages (maybe using UDH ?) Stephane, SMS protocol does not have any transaction-oriented capabilities built in. I'm afraid you'll have to come up with a solution more or less painful for your users: 1. You could, as mentioned, ask the client to include a tracking number. 2. If you don't expect to send many requests at the same time to the same guy, You could implement some time-window oriented mechanism, that is: any reply you get during the X minutes after sending message #432 to number 123 is supossedly regarding message #432. After X minutes, you consider the #432 abandoned even if 123 replies to it. This works as long as you don't have more than one open message with a particular ANI. In that case you could indicate that he must include the tracking number... (here the painful part comes to developing the logic for this, nbut it's absolutely doable). 3. You could implemente the messages as wap pushes (with the tracking number encoded) and redirect the client to a wap form where he can reply ot them. Hope it helps, Alejandro Guerrieri On 8/16/05, Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, What I'm trying to do is to track messages when they are replied to. The goal is to use Kannel to send alerts to people and let them a chance to acknowledge them (will be used With Nagios for those who know it). How can I put some kind of transaction number in a message sent, so that I can track it back when it is replied to. For example : Send message HOST X IS DOWN to number 123 Send message HOST Z IS DOWN to number 456 Guy with number 123 replies ACK I will take care of it Guy with number 456 replies NACK got no time now I want to create two sms-services, ACK and NACK and log their answer in the system, but how can I match messages sent with replies ? I could add an alert number to the text, but users would have to retype that number when replying, that's painful. Hope I'm clear enough. Thanks for any hint. Cheers Stephane -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
RE: SMS Service questions
Hola Alejandro,
Welcome to regex irregular world :-))
I suggest using this instead :
keyword-regex=^(BS|bs) [0-9]{4}
\s and \d are understood only in Perl regex, not grep-like regex
Good luck :)
Cheers
Stephane
--
Stephane Rosa
IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA
Tel: +41 21 966 12 38
Cell: +41 79 616 08 28
Stryker EMEA
Grand Rue 92
CH-1820 Montreux, Switzerland
http://www.europe.stryker.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 19:49
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: SMS Service questions
Hello All!
I've been using consistently kannel for a few months and i'm
really happy with it... however i have a question about regex
Right now i have this service:
group = sms-service
keyword = testing_u
keyword-regex=^(BS|bs)
allowed-receiver-prefix=333;50
#catch-all= true
get-url =
http://192.168.9.180/entrance.asp?phnmbr=%pmsg=%aService=%isvc=%P;
accept-x-kannel-headers = true
max-messages= 0
It matches any service starting with BS or bs.
Im trying it to match bs and 4 digits after it like this BS
1234 TY 123
keyword-regex=^(BS|bs)\s\d{4}.*
but it DOES not match :(
Any clues of what i might be doing wrong??
Thanks!
Alejandro
RE: Kannel Message Boards?
How about forum.kannel.org if you ask for a record In their DNS ? That's probably the best thing to do. Clipper -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anand Gupta Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 13:58 To: Gareth Reakes Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Kannel Message Boards? I am ready to register and host the forums if members here can recommend a domain for the same. I posted earlier also however no commented till now. -- regards, Anand Gupta Original message Subject: Re: Kannel Message Boards? Author: Gareth Reakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 18th July 2005 10:34:28 Hey, I think it would be a good idea. Who is going to take the lead on this? Gareth Bill Brigden wrote: Just a short note to say I would be willing to help in any ways (within reason!) necessary.. Bill. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yasser Sultan Sent: 15 July 2005 17:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Kannel Message Boards? I don't think that they will be too resource intensive form hosting point of view, so It should not be a problem for anyone to set them up. Yeah I will be willing to help :) -Cheers Yasser From: Gareth Reakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Yasser Sultan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kannel Message Boards? Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:15:54 +0100 Hey Yasser, Yasser Sultan wrote: Why doesn't kannel has its forums or online discussion boards? Don't you think that with them it will be easier to keep track of the things and help can be provided in a better way, considering the features and options present in the modern bulletin board systems Thank You Probably because no one has set one up yet :) You offering? Gareth -- Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing +44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com -- Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing +44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
RE: Kannel Message Boards?
Well, I think that forums can easily (and should) replace mailing lists. I
see several reasons for this :
1) Search. Searching mailing lists archives is painful, and I'm sure most
people will just post the same question again without trying to search
first. Forums are much more efficient in searching by subject, body,
poster, date, etc.
2) Organisation. Beside major groups like bugs, devel, user, most forums
provide sub-groups allowing to segregate a group in several major areas
(e.g. Development-Web Interface, Development-Core, etc)
3) Traffic. I'm an Internet Ecologist(tm) and I strongly see the mailing
list traffic as a totally useless bandwidth nuisance, mostly because when
someone subscribes to a mailing list he reads everything the first week,
the second week he deletes without reading, the third week he creates an
automatic folder rule and never reads most of the content ever again.
Spam moderation is not so much of an issue, as long as you have to be
authenticated to post, and being part of several dozens of forums I never
seen any spam in them.
That's my 0.02$ advocacy, hope it helps :-D
Cheers
Clipper
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yasser Sultan
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 16:03
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Kannel Message Boards?
IMO It would be great if you consult the Kannel project
maintainers and have their views about it, so that you can
have official forums just like the mailing list
yes, I agree that the they should be on the kannel site
hosted on a subdomain or something like kannel.org/forums
The only problem with forums is that they also need to
closely moderated because of spam and other useless messages
that people often post
Regards
Yasser
--
Talk about Love Friendship at Latestngreatest Forums
http://www.latestngreatest.net/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl
From: Anand Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Anand Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Brigden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Kannel Message Boards?
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:51:40 +0530
Would people see the mailing lists as redundant if there were web
based
forums?
well both can serve the purpose, at times mailing lists are
better and
sometimes forums.
--
regards,
Anand Gupta
Original message
Subject: RE: Kannel Message Boards?
Author: Bill Brigden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:18th July 2005 1:32:16
What do other people think about the possibility of having a
web forum?
Would people see the mailing lists as redundant if there
were web based
forums?
As far as the name / location - could it be put under kannel.org,
either as being hosted there, or using a sub domain
(forums.kannel.org?) pointing elsewhere?
Regards,
Bill.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anand Gupta
Sent: 18 July 2005 12:58
To: Gareth Reakes
Cc: Bill Brigden; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Kannel Message Boards?
I am ready to register and host the forums if members here can
recommend a domain for the same. I posted earlier also however no
commented till now.
--
regards,
Anand Gupta
Original message
Subject: Re: Kannel Message Boards?
Author: Gareth Reakes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 18th July 2005 10:34:28
Hey,
I think it would be a good idea. Who is going to take
the lead on
this?
Gareth
Bill Brigden wrote:
Just a short note to say I would be willing to help in any
ways (within
reason!) necessary..
Bill.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yasser Sultan
Sent: 15 July 2005 17:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Kannel Message Boards?
I don't think that they will be too resource intensive form
hosting point of view, so It should not be a problem
for anyone to
set them up.
Yeah I will be willing to help :)
-Cheers
Yasser
From: Gareth Reakes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yasser Sultan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kannel Message Boards?
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:15:54 +0100
Hey Yasser,
Yasser Sultan wrote:
Why doesn't kannel has its forums or online discussion boards?
Don't you think that with them it will be easier to keep
track of the
things
and help can be provided in a better way, considering the
features and
options present in the modern bulletin board systems
Thank You
Probably because no one has set one up yet :)
You offering?
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184
Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox
Fiddling with gdb, I found out that the high cpu load is caused by the call to gwthread_sleep(10.0); at line 605 of bearerbox.c. Tracing further, gwthread_sleep calls poll(), with a timeout of 10 seconds. When I step that line, gdb hangs for the entire 10 seconds and the cpu raises straight to 99%. poll() is supposed to sleep until something happend on an fd, I have no idea why this happens. Those two pieces of code seem not to have changed since 2003, so I'm surprised we are not all of us seeing the same issue. I will compile and run it on Solaris to see if it makes any difference. Maybe poll() behaves differently on RedHat SE. Cheers Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Julien Buratto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24-05-05 17:49 To Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc users@kannel.org Subject Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox Stephane Rosa wrote: Thanks Julien, I did that already and the gdb thing reveals a backtrace on gwthread_sleep like you were experiencing I guess. May I ask how you solved your problem ? Thanks Make this laught: I havent' :) I'm still using 1.4.0 because CVS goes into cpu overload so I've decided to manually patch the 1.4.0 and apply there my own code. J
Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox
I just compiled the same sources on a dual-cpu Sun server and the behavior is exactly the same as on RedHat 9 (SE). How come is this happening ? Are we the only one experiencing this ?? Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25-05-05 11:34 To Julien Buratto [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc users@kannel.org Subject Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox Fiddling with gdb, I found out that the high cpu load is caused by the call to gwthread_sleep(10.0); at line 605 of bearerbox.c. Tracing further, gwthread_sleep calls poll(), with a timeout of 10 seconds. When I step that line, gdb hangs for the entire 10 seconds and the cpu raises straight to 99%. poll() is supposed to sleep until something happend on an fd, I have no idea why this happens. Those two pieces of code seem not to have changed since 2003, so I'm surprised we are not all of us seeing the same issue. I will compile and run it on Solaris to see if it makes any difference. Maybe poll() behaves differently on RedHat SE. Cheers Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Julien Buratto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24-05-05 17:49 To Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc users@kannel.org Subject Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox Stephane Rosa wrote: Thanks Julien, I did that already and the gdb thing reveals a backtrace on gwthread_sleep like you were experiencing I guess. May I ask how you solved your problem ? Thanks Make this laught: I havent' :) I'm still using 1.4.0 because CVS goes into cpu overload so I've decided to manually patch the 1.4.0 and apply there my own code. J
Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox
Opened bug 230 about bearerbox causes 99% cpu load (for the records in this users mailing list) Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25-05-05 12:39 To Julien Buratto [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc users@kannel.org Subject Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox I just compiled the same sources on a dual-cpu Sun server and the behavior is exactly the same as on RedHat 9 (SE). How come is this happening ? Are we the only one experiencing this ?? Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25-05-05 11:34 To Julien Buratto [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc users@kannel.org Subject Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox Fiddling with gdb, I found out that the high cpu load is caused by the call to gwthread_sleep(10.0); at line 605 of bearerbox.c. Tracing further, gwthread_sleep calls poll(), with a timeout of 10 seconds. When I step that line, gdb hangs for the entire 10 seconds and the cpu raises straight to 99%. poll() is supposed to sleep until something happend on an fd, I have no idea why this happens. Those two pieces of code seem not to have changed since 2003, so I'm surprised we are not all of us seeing the same issue. I will compile and run it on Solaris to see if it makes any difference. Maybe poll() behaves differently on RedHat SE. Cheers Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Julien Buratto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24-05-05 17:49 To Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc users@kannel.org Subject Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox Stephane Rosa wrote: Thanks Julien, I did that already and the gdb thing reveals a backtrace on gwthread_sleep like you were experiencing I guess. May I ask how you solved your problem ? Thanks Make this laught: I havent' :) I'm still using 1.4.0 because CVS goes into cpu overload so I've decided to manually patch the 1.4.0 and apply there my own code. J
Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox
After having done some research in the devel list, I need to add that : 1) I tried to add the setting 'store-dump-freq 10' in the core section since it seems to default to -1 instead of 10 as in the documentation. That did not change anything. 2) I'm using a UCP/EMI smsc, so I don't feel concerned by the thead about smsc_cimd2.c causing 99% cpu. 3) my cpu is still at 99% with no messages in/outbound at all, here is the content of the status page : Kannel bearerbox version `cvs-20050506'. Build `May 6 2005 13:26:05', compiler `3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-47)'. System Linux, release 2.4.21-27.EL, version #1 Wed Dec 1 22:08:15 EST 2004, machine i686. Hostname smsgate, IP 127.0.0.1. Libxml version 2.5.10. Using OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003. Compiled with MySQL 4.1.11, using MySQL 4.1.11. Using native malloc. Status: running, uptime 0d 0h 16m 2s WDP: received 0 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued) SMS: received 0 (0 queued), sent 1 (0 queued), store size 0 SMS: inbound 0.00 msg/sec, outbound 0.00 msg/sec DLR: 0 queued, using internal storage Box connections: smsbox:(none), IP 127.0.0.1 (0 queued), (on-line 0d 0h 16m 2s) SMSC connections: swisscomEMI2:xxx.xxx.xx.xxx::x (online 198s, rcvd 0, sent 1, failed 0, queued 0 msgs) Thanks for your help (at least I read the mailing lists...) :-) Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24-05-05 13:53 To users@kannel.org cc Subject cpu load 99% by bearerbox hi, although kannel is totally idle in terms of messages, the bearerbox is eating all my cpu. I run cvs 20050506. thanks -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com
Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox
Thanks Julien, I did that already and the gdb thing reveals a backtrace on gwthread_sleep like you were experiencing I guess. May I ask how you solved your problem ? Thanks -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Julien Buratto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24-05-05 17:22 To Stephane Rosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox Stephane Rosa wrote: After having done some research in the devel list, I need to add that : 1) I tried to add the setting 'store-dump-freq 10' in the core section since it seems to default to -1 instead of 10 as in the documentation. That did not change anything. 2) I'm using a UCP/EMI smsc, so I don't feel concerned by the thead about smsc_cimd2.c causing 99% cpu. 3) my cpu is still at 99% with no messages in/outbound at all, here is the content of the status page : I have the same problem with CVS and cannot use it. I'm using 1.4.0 with no problems. Check previous tests and suggestions I've received in the past 2 months J
Re: SMSC Options
Hi Jimmy, by googling SMSC USA UCP I got this hit : http://www.gsmfavorites.com/sms/smsc-list/ As I can see, the providers in the US are most likely to use TAP, which is an old pager protocol that Kannel does not support (as far as I know). You could probably contact european providers (since GSM is much more developped there) and maybe they can offer you UCP over TCP/IP even if you're overseas. A mobile phone pool could also work, but remember that Kannel also support HTTP protocol, if you can find an SMS gateway provider using web based interface that might be a solution as well. HTH -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com Jimmy McMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18-05-05 16:50 To users@kannel.org cc Subject SMSC Options First let me explain that I'm in the US, and this is my first message to this list, nice to meet you all ;) I''ve been reading about the SMSC options, and I'm rather confused. I'm currently working on making a SMS gateway server for another company this will be sending mass MMS messages to thousands of users. I've looked into using GSM modems, for instance, getting 15-20 cingular phones or PCMCIA cards and setting them up round-robin style with kannel, but I'm unpleased with this option. I'm really interested in the TCP/IP options, like SMPP and/or CMG SMS, but I have no idea where to find these solutions. I've googled until my fingers were bleeding and the only thing I could find was http://www.simplewire.com/ . They are majorly pricey especially for begining testing purposes. Are their any other SMPP or CMG providers that I'm not finding? I'd rather go the internet way instead of the hardware way, can someone point me in the proper path? Thanks in advance. Jimmy
Re: Compiling on Red HAt 9.0
Hi Richard, the kerberos include file was not found by configure. You need to add the following when you run ./configure : --with-cflags=-I/usr/kerberos/include Hope it helps Stephane -- Stephane Rosa IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA Tel: +41 21 966-1238 Cell: +41 79 616-0828 Stryker EMEA Grand Rue 92 CH-1820 Montreux http://www.europe.stryker.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07-05-05 11:04 To users@kannel.org cc Subject Compiling on Red HAt 9.0 Hi I am new to Kannel When I have tried to run make on the source I get this error gcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I. -Igw -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_BSD_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/openssl -o gw/bb_alog.o -c gw/bb_alog.c In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:179, from gwlib/conn.h:274, from gwlib/gwlib.h:94, from gw/bb_alog.c:64: /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:72:18: krb5.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:179, from gwlib/conn.h:274, from gwlib/gwlib.h:94, from gw/bb_alog.c:64: /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:132: parse error before krb5_enctype /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:134: parse error before FAR /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:135: parse error before '}' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:147: parse error before kssl_ctx_setstring /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:147: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:148: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:149: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:149: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:150: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:151: parse error before kssl_ctx_setprinc /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:151: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:153: parse error before kssl_cget_tkt /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:153: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:155: parse error before kssl_sget_tkt /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:155: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:157: parse error before kssl_ctx_setkey /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:157: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:159: parse error before context /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:160: parse error before kssl_build_principal_2 /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:160: parse error before context /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:163: parse error before kssl_validate_times /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:163: parse error before atime /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:165: parse error before kssl_check_authent /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:165: parse error before '*' token /usr/include/openssl/kssl.h:167: parse error before enctype In file included from gwlib/conn.h:274, from gwlib/gwlib.h:94, from gw/bb_alog.c:64: /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:909: parse error before KSSL_CTX /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:915: `debug' redeclared as different kind of symbol gwlib/log.h:114: previous declaration of `debug' /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:931: parse error before '}' token make: *** [gw/bb_alog.o] Error 1 I have tried to ensure that the compatiblit of the linraries is as up to date as possible. Is anybody running Kannel on Red Hat 9.0 and can advise about the error Regards Richard
/etc/init.d/kannel for RedHat
Hi there,
if someone is interested, I made a new
init.d script for Kannel under redhat. It does not
make use of start-stop-daemon but uses
the internal stuff instead. I also added PID handling
and auto-start of either smsbox, wapbox
or both based on the config file.
To use it, assuming Kannel wil run under
user/group sms, do the following as root after having
saved the file in /etc/init.d/kannel
and fixed any path if needed :
mkdir /var/run/kannel
chown sms.sms /var/run/kannel
chgrp ug+rwx,o-rwx /var/run/kannel
chkconfig --add kannel
chkconfig kannel on
/etc/init.d/kannel start
Hope it helps. If you find any bugs
or improvements... I'll be glad to hear about it.
Stephane
=== /etc/init.d/kannel
#!/bin/bash
#
# gateway This shell script takes care of starting
and stopping
# the Kannel SMS
WAP gateway
# Original version
Fabrice Gatille fgatille_AT_ivision.fr
# Modified by Stephane
Rosa stephane.rosa_AT_stryker.com for RedHat9
# chkconfig: 2345 97 03
# description: Kannel is an SMS and WAP gateway
VERSION=`/usr/local/bin/gw-config --version`
OPTIONS=--daemonize --user sms --pid-file /var/run/kannel/
KANNELPATH=/usr/local/sbin
CONF=/etc/kannel.conf
# Source function library networking conf.
. /etc/init.d/functions
[ -f /etc/sysconfig/network ] . /etc/sysconfig/network
# Check that we are root ... so non-root users stop
here
[ `id -u` = 0 ] || exit 1
# Various other checks
[ ${NETWORKING} = yes ] || exit 0
[ -x $KANNELPATH/bearerbox ] || exit 0
[ -x $KANNELPATH/smsbox ] || exit 0
[ -x $KANNELPATH/wapbox ] || exit 0
[ -f $CONF ] || exit 0
RETVAL=0; RETVAL1=0; RETVAL2=0; RETVAL3=0
prog=Kannel
start() {
# Check that at least one group is defined
for sms
# and/or wap to start the bearer. Then
start boxes
# as needed.
startsms=`egrep -se '^[ \t]*group *=
*smsbox' $CONF`
startwap=`egrep -se '^[ \t]*group *=
*wapbox' $CONF`
if [ -n $startsms$startwap
]; then
echo -n Starting bearer
service ($prog $VERSION):
daemon /usr/local/sbin/bearerbox
${OPTIONS}bearerbox.pid -- $CONF
RETVAL1=$?
echo
else
exit 0
fi
if [ -n $startsms ]; then
echo -n Starting smsbox
service ($prog $VERSION):
daemon /usr/local/sbin/smsbox
${OPTIONS}smsbox.pid -- $CONF
RETVAL2=$?
echo
fi
if [ -n $startwap ]; then
echo -n Starting wapbox
service ($prog $VERSION):
daemon /usr/local/sbin/wapbox
${OPTIONS}wapbox.pid -- $CONF
RETVAL3=$?
echo
fi
let RETVAL=$REVAL1+$RETVAL2+$RETVAL3
if [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ]; then
touch /var/lock/subsys/gateway
fi
return $RETVAL
}
stop() {
echo -n Shutting down $prog $VERSION:
killproc wapbox quiet
RETVAL3=$?
killproc smsbox quiet
RETVAL2=$?
killproc bearerbox quiet
RETVAL1=$?
echo
let RETVAL=$REVAL1+$RETVAL2+$RETVAL3
if [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ]; then
rm -f /var/lock/subsys/gateway
fi
return $RETVAL
}
# See how we were called.
case $1 in
start)
# Start daemons.
start
;;
stop)
# Stop daemons
stop
;;
restart)
# Restart daemons
stop
sleep 1
start
;;
status)
status bearerbox
status smsbox
status wapbox
exit $?
;;
*)
echo Usage: named {start|stop|status|restart}
RETVAL=1
esac
exit $RETVAL
--
Stephane Rosa
IT Security Network Specialist, EMEA
Tel: +41 21 966-1238
Cell: +41 79 616-0828
Stryker EMEA
Grand Rue 92
CH-1820 Montreux
http://www.europe.stryker.com
