Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
Ho,
I dunno. I have been using regexp for ages, and it is the first time I see
'\w'. I am not sure if it is part of the standard regexp. Even grep -E or
egrep in linux doesn't understand it. Why should kannel?
If you need more flexibility, you can compile with pcre and use perl-like
expressions.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "fegul"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
I'm continuing to do that however I find it strange that regular
expressions
(which I've always thought were fairly universal) are being interpreted
differently by Kannel than by the test utilities that I've used...
I wonder if other Kannel users have experienced this?
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Regardless, test by parts.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "fegul"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
\w is meant to match any word character. If you insert the expression
into
this tester, you can try various patterns to see what it matches:
http://gskinner.com/RegExr/
the email address that I type into the testing tool and the email
address
that I use as the keyword in the text message is the same and is seen as
valid by the testing tool but apparently not by Kannel.
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Hi,
Have you tried it? It doesn't look right. What is \w?
Test it by part:
[0-9a-za-z.-...@[0-9a-za-z._]+
And add more parts as you go.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "fegul"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:44 PM
Subject: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
I have two sms-services defined, one that catches messages with a
keyword
that matches a regular expression (using 'keyword-regex' in the
sms-service)
and one that catches everything else (using keyword = default) to a
different script.
The regex compiles and I've tested it using some online tools but
kannel
still sends messages that would be valid according to the regex in the
first
sms-service to the default sms-service instead.
Any ideas as to why? I'm testing it using fakesmsc with MTMO
direction
switching and composing the text in interactive mode like so:
555 100 text m...@me.com the message content
The regex in question is:
^([0-9a-zA-Z]([-.\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z])*@([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,9})$
It is meant to seek out valid email addresses
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583542.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583852.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28584507.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
I'm continuing to do that however I find it strange that regular expressions
(which I've always thought were fairly universal) are being interpreted
differently by Kannel than by the test utilities that I've used...
I wonder if other Kannel users have experienced this?
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
>
> Regardless, test by parts.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "fegul"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
>
>
>>
>> \w is meant to match any word character. If you insert the expression
>> into
>> this tester, you can try various patterns to see what it matches:
>> http://gskinner.com/RegExr/
>>
>> the email address that I type into the testing tool and the email address
>> that I use as the keyword in the text message is the same and is seen as
>> valid by the testing tool but apparently not by Kannel.
>>
>>
>> Nikos Balkanas wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Have you tried it? It doesn't look right. What is \w?
>>>
>>> Test it by part:
>>>
>>> [0-9a-za-z.-...@[0-9a-za-z._]+
>>>
>>> And add more parts as you go.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Nikos
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "fegul"
>>> To:
>>> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:44 PM
>>> Subject: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have two sms-services defined, one that catches messages with a
>>>> keyword
>>>> that matches a regular expression (using 'keyword-regex' in the
>>>> sms-service)
>>>> and one that catches everything else (using keyword = default) to a
>>>> different script.
>>>>
>>>> The regex compiles and I've tested it using some online tools but
>>>> kannel
>>>> still sends messages that would be valid according to the regex in the
>>>> first
>>>> sms-service to the default sms-service instead.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas as to why? I'm testing it using fakesmsc with MTMO direction
>>>> switching and composing the text in interactive mode like so:
>>>>
>>>> 555 100 text m...@me.com the message content
>>>>
>>>> The regex in question is:
>>>> ^([0-9a-zA-Z]([-.\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z])*@([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,9})$
>>>>
>>>> It is meant to seek out valid email addresses
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583542.html
>>>> Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583852.html
>> Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28584507.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
Regardless, test by parts.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "fegul"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
\w is meant to match any word character. If you insert the expression
into
this tester, you can try various patterns to see what it matches:
http://gskinner.com/RegExr/
the email address that I type into the testing tool and the email address
that I use as the keyword in the text message is the same and is seen as
valid by the testing tool but apparently not by Kannel.
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Hi,
Have you tried it? It doesn't look right. What is \w?
Test it by part:
[0-9a-za-z.-...@[0-9a-za-z._]+
And add more parts as you go.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "fegul"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:44 PM
Subject: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
I have two sms-services defined, one that catches messages with a
keyword
that matches a regular expression (using 'keyword-regex' in the
sms-service)
and one that catches everything else (using keyword = default) to a
different script.
The regex compiles and I've tested it using some online tools but kannel
still sends messages that would be valid according to the regex in the
first
sms-service to the default sms-service instead.
Any ideas as to why? I'm testing it using fakesmsc with MTMO direction
switching and composing the text in interactive mode like so:
555 100 text m...@me.com the message content
The regex in question is:
^([0-9a-zA-Z]([-.\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z])*@([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,9})$
It is meant to seek out valid email addresses
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583542.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583852.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
\w is meant to match any word character. If you insert the expression into
this tester, you can try various patterns to see what it matches:
http://gskinner.com/RegExr/
the email address that I type into the testing tool and the email address
that I use as the keyword in the text message is the same and is seen as
valid by the testing tool but apparently not by Kannel.
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Have you tried it? It doesn't look right. What is \w?
>
> Test it by part:
>
> [0-9a-za-z.-...@[0-9a-za-z._]+
>
> And add more parts as you go.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: "fegul"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:44 PM
> Subject: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
>
>
>>
>> I have two sms-services defined, one that catches messages with a keyword
>> that matches a regular expression (using 'keyword-regex' in the
>> sms-service)
>> and one that catches everything else (using keyword = default) to a
>> different script.
>>
>> The regex compiles and I've tested it using some online tools but kannel
>> still sends messages that would be valid according to the regex in the
>> first
>> sms-service to the default sms-service instead.
>>
>> Any ideas as to why? I'm testing it using fakesmsc with MTMO direction
>> switching and composing the text in interactive mode like so:
>>
>> 555 100 text m...@me.com the message content
>>
>> The regex in question is:
>> ^([0-9a-zA-Z]([-.\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z])*@([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,9})$
>>
>> It is meant to seek out valid email addresses
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583542.html
>> Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583852.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
Hi,
Have you tried it? It doesn't look right. What is \w?
Test it by part:
[0-9a-za-z.-...@[0-9a-za-z._]+
And add more parts as you go.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "fegul"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:44 PM
Subject: Regex problems in sms-service and keywords
I have two sms-services defined, one that catches messages with a keyword
that matches a regular expression (using 'keyword-regex' in the
sms-service)
and one that catches everything else (using keyword = default) to a
different script.
The regex compiles and I've tested it using some online tools but kannel
still sends messages that would be valid according to the regex in the
first
sms-service to the default sms-service instead.
Any ideas as to why? I'm testing it using fakesmsc with MTMO direction
switching and composing the text in interactive mode like so:
555 100 text m...@me.com the message content
The regex in question is:
^([0-9a-zA-Z]([-.\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z])*@([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,9})$
It is meant to seek out valid email addresses
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Regex-problems-in-sms-service-and-keywords-tp28583542p28583542.html
Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
