"configure" isn't creating a "make"

2010-06-07 Thread Ian Ring

I've run ./configure, and it spews out piles of stuff.
The first time I ran it, I was missing libxml... so I installed that.  
Now it seems to be configuring OK because I see the license  
information at the end, no error messages, and one of the lines says  
"config.status: creating Makefile"


As instructed in the docs, I type "make", and this is the response:

-bash: make: command not found

So what am I doing wrong?

Some of the configure output says:
"checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
"checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
"checking for /blah blah blah ... no"

Are all of these things required? Most of them are "yes", but there  
are some "no"'s scattered throughout.


Apologies for being a relatively new Linux user

Ian



Re: "configure" isn't creating a "make"

2010-06-07 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Ian,

You're missing the "make" binary. You need to install the "make" package on
your OS.

Regards,

Alex

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Ian Ring  wrote:

> I've run ./configure, and it spews out piles of stuff.
> The first time I ran it, I was missing libxml... so I installed that. Now
> it seems to be configuring OK because I see the license information at the
> end, no error messages, and one of the lines says "config.status: creating
> Makefile"
>
> As instructed in the docs, I type "make", and this is the response:
>
> -bash: make: command not found
>
> So what am I doing wrong?
>
> Some of the configure output says:
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
>
> Are all of these things required? Most of them are "yes", but there are
> some "no"'s scattered throughout.
>
> Apologies for being a relatively new Linux user
>
> Ian
>
>


Re: "configure" isn't creating a "make"

2010-06-07 Thread Garth Patil
Is make installed? If configure exits without errors, and there is a
file called "Makefile" now in that directory, your problem is probably
that make isn't installed, not that configure isn't working. Learning
how to build software is a question for a different mailing list.

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Ian Ring  wrote:
> I've run ./configure, and it spews out piles of stuff.
> The first time I ran it, I was missing libxml... so I installed that. Now it
> seems to be configuring OK because I see the license information at the end,
> no error messages, and one of the lines says "config.status: creating
> Makefile"
>
> As instructed in the docs, I type "make", and this is the response:
>
> -bash: make: command not found
>
> So what am I doing wrong?
>
> Some of the configure output says:
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
>
> Are all of these things required? Most of them are "yes", but there are some
> "no"'s scattered throughout.
>
> Apologies for being a relatively new Linux user
>
> Ian
>
>



Re: "configure" isn't creating a "make"

2010-06-07 Thread Ian Ring

Thanks guys,

"yum install make"

is all I needed. Now we're humming.

Cheers





On 2010-06-07, at 1:12 PM, Garth Patil wrote:


Is make installed? If configure exits without errors, and there is a
file called "Makefile" now in that directory, your problem is probably
that make isn't installed, not that configure isn't working. Learning
how to build software is a question for a different mailing list.

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Ian Ring  wrote:

I've run ./configure, and it spews out piles of stuff.
The first time I ran it, I was missing libxml... so I installed  
that. Now it
seems to be configuring OK because I see the license information at  
the end,

no error messages, and one of the lines says "config.status: creating
Makefile"

As instructed in the docs, I type "make", and this is the response:

-bash: make: command not found

So what am I doing wrong?

Some of the configure output says:
"checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
"checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
"checking for /blah blah blah ... no"

Are all of these things required? Most of them are "yes", but there  
are some

"no"'s scattered throughout.

Apologies for being a relatively new Linux user

Ian







Re: "configure" isn't creating a "make"

2010-06-07 Thread Thomas Sieh
have you installed make?
try in the console

which make

otherwise

search for make in synaptics or type 
sudo apt-get install make


On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 01:07:24PM -0400, Ian Ring wrote:
> I've run ./configure, and it spews out piles of stuff.
> The first time I ran it, I was missing libxml... so I installed that.  
> Now it seems to be configuring OK because I see the license information 
> at the end, no error messages, and one of the lines says "config.status: 
> creating Makefile"
>
> As instructed in the docs, I type "make", and this is the response:
>
> -bash: make: command not found
>
> So what am I doing wrong?
>
> Some of the configure output says:
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
> "checking for /blah blah blah ... no"
>
> Are all of these things required? Most of them are "yes", but there are 
> some "no"'s scattered throughout.
>
> Apologies for being a relatively new Linux user
>
> Ian


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature