Asian fonts are not shown correctly in F14?
Hi, I installed some Asiatic fonts, for example the lohit group or thai fonts, but these fonts are not shown correctly (latin letters are displayed - the fonts look like arial for example). I saw this accidentally if using OO. Then I tried the /usr/bin/display command (from ImageMagick) for the correspondent ttf files in /usr/share/fonts: shows the same behaviour. Finally I tried a lot of fonts offered by OO, and saw a similar behaviour. ls /usr/share/fonts bitstream-vera lohit-bengali opensymbolvlgothic default lohit-devanagari paktype-naqsh wine-courier-fonts dejavu lohit-gujaratipaktype-tehreer wine-marlett-fonts Gentium102 lohit-kannada paratype-pt-sans wine-small-fonts he lohit-oriya sil-abyssinicawine-symbol-fonts jomolhari lohit-punjabi sil-padaukwine-system-fonts khmeros lohit-tamil smc wqy-zenhei liberation lohit-telugu stix lklug lyx thai-scalable lohit-assamese un-core What I'm doing wrong? -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora 14, Wine 1.3.8, Corel WordPerfect Office 12, now a permanent stain
On 12/10/2010 05:37 AM, David Liguori wrote: > I hadn't tried Wine in a while so I gave this a go. After crashing it, > searching around and finding some suggestions for a better installation, > I tried to uninstall WPO and begin again. But, when I run the > uninstaller, it only pretends to uninstall it--it's still there. The > windows are in a barely readable dim grey. I re-ran the uninstallation > with the WPO disk, same thing. So I tried uninstalling Wine, first with > system ->administration ->add/remove software then with yum erase wine. > It's all still there, like a red wine stain. Anyone have similar woes > and find a work-around? Hi, if Corel WPO was installed by a .msi file (I don't know), then the uninstaller does not work. This is a known issue. And to your special problem: uninstalling wine does not remove the ~/.wine directory, and not the wine parts in ~/.local/share/applications! That's the red wine stain :-) Kind regards -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: dd question
Unfortunately no new lines between records. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
JB wrote: > admin lewis gmail.com> writes: > >> ... > A hard link is basically a link to the i-node number of the original file. > > i-node numbers are not portable across different disks. > > Hard links can only be created to files on the same file system. > > To create a hard link, the original file and the link file should exist in the > same partition. > Actually in one filesystem, partitions have nothing to do with it. You can have hard links in LVM, regardless of the PV under it. > LVM is a logical superstructure consisting of different physical partitions on > same or different disks. > > JB > > > -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Wierd YUM error :S Help Please!
This just started today, Yesterday everything seem to be fine, but today
I tried to install a program via YUM and Konsole returned me a Wierd error,
This error repeats with every YUM task I try to perform, se my output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in
yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 258, in user_main
errcode = main(args)
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 97, in main
base.doLock()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 1593, in
doLock
while not self._lock(lockfile, mypid, 0644):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 1653, in
_lock
errmsg = _('Could not create lock at %s: %s ') % (filename, str(msg))
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 24:
ordinal not in range(128)
Why is this happening? How can I fix it?
--
<-Manuel Escudero->
Linux User #509052
@GWave: jmlev...@googlewave.com
@Blogger: http://www.blogxenode.tk/ (Xenode Systems Blog)
PGP/GnuPG: DAE3 82E9 D68E 7AE4 ED31 1F8F 4AF4 D00C 50E7 ABC6
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Setup local repo for F14 install packages. What am I doing wrong?
Frank Murphy wrote: > On 08/12/10 16:57, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Rename your own local.repo to _local.repo (the name will get it checked > first). > > Dump the priorities. I just set priority=1 for the local, WFM -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Problem with yum (was Re: command wvdial not found)
hi, I have the same problem when I use ipv6 repository. There are some output below: [r...@localhost ~]# yum -d 255 repolist Not loading "blacklist" plugin, as it is disabled Loading "presto" plugin Loading "refresh-packagekit" plugin Not loading "whiteout" plugin, as it is disabled Running "config" handler for "presto" plugin Config time: 0.061 Yum Version: 3.2.28 COMMAND: yum -d 255 repolist Installroot: / ftp://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/Linux/Fedora/releases/13/Everything/i386/os/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 7 - "" Trying other mirror. Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: jaist. Please verify its path and try again but when i use ipv4 repository, everything is ok. It's the yum bug? I hope someone can give me some help. Thanks! 2010/12/7 Michael Schwendt > On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 12:04:05 +, Tony wrote: > > > > [r...@localhost ~]# yum provides */bin/wvdial > > > Modules complémentaires chargés : presto, refresh-packagekit > > > Erreur : Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for > repository: > > > fedora. Please verify its path and try again > > > > > > The text in french means: Additional modules loaded. > > > > > > I'm using fedora12 (i don't want to upgrade to a newer version). > > > > > > Thank you > > The output is not detailed enough. You would need to increase the > verbosity or --debug setting. > > > wvdial is available in the Fedora Everything repo for Fedora 12 > > > > wvdial-1.60-10.fc12.i686.rpm > > > > Make sure the Fedora Everything repo is enabled. > > Try the following > > > > yum clean metadata > > yum install wvdial > > Take a close look at the output of > > yum -d 255 repolist > > and verify that for the Repo-Id "fedora" you can see a valid Repo-metalink > for the Fedora mirror list, which you can access/download without > problems. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Fedora 14, Wine 1.3.8, Corel WordPerfect Office 12, now a permanent stain
I hadn't tried Wine in a while so I gave this a go. After crashing it, searching around and finding some suggestions for a better installation, I tried to uninstall WPO and begin again. But, when I run the uninstaller, it only pretends to uninstall it--it's still there. The windows are in a barely readable dim grey. I re-ran the uninstallation with the WPO disk, same thing. So I tried uninstalling Wine, first with system ->administration ->add/remove software then with yum erase wine. It's all still there, like a red wine stain. Anyone have similar woes and find a work-around? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F14 mplayer doesn't adjust brightness in X, nouveau
I'm having a problem with mplayer in F14 x86_64. mplayer doesn't allow the use of the 3 and 4 keys to adjust brightness during playback in X with nouveau, though it works in the console. When I used it in F12 with the nv driver, it worked just fine in X. Would this be a problem in mplayer or nouveau? Or ??? Wondering if anyone knows how to fix this or what I should report this as a bug against. Thanks. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: dd question
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:11:25AM +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > I have a binary file with data. Each block of 48 bytes is a record. I > want to extract the first 8 bytes within each record. I'm thinking this > should be possible with dd, but gawk, perl - anything goes. It just has > to be fast, because the data files are ~ 1Gb. > > I can do this in C++ but I was just wondering if it can be done with > existing well tested tools. > > Any suggestions? Thanks! May be able to do something with cut. It may depend on if the records are newline-terminated or not. but using cut you can specify a set of bytes to be output (while the rest of the line is discarded), so you may be able to do something like this: dd if=yourfilename bs=48 | cut -b 1-8 > outfile ah. just did a quick hack test with a file containing this: a234567890123456789012345678901234567890 b234567890123456789012345678901234567890 c234567890123456789012345678901234567890 d234567890123456789012345678901234567890 and this seems to do the trick: cut filename -b 1-8 giving: a2345678 b2345678 c2345678 d2345678 which looks like what you wanted. however this is a text file with newlines,... if it has no newlines your mileage may vary. in that case you could try some sed or awk hacks to insert newlines after each 48 bytes then feed it to cut. good luck! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. -- Philippians 4:13 --- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
dd question
I have a binary file with data. Each block of 48 bytes is a record. I want to extract the first 8 bytes within each record. I'm thinking this should be possible with dd, but gawk, perl - anything goes. It just has to be fast, because the data files are ~ 1Gb. I can do this in C++ but I was just wondering if it can be done with existing well tested tools. Any suggestions? Thanks! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
FluidSynth configuration
I installed FluidSynth and qsynth on my F13 / KDE install. When qsynth comes up, it asked me to do some additional configuration by modifying /etc/security/limits.conf to add: @audio - rtprio 100 @audio - nice-10 After I made the changes and restarted it, it then asked me to add myself to the audio group. I'm not sure what I did or why this needs to be done. I'd appreciate a pointer or some better advice. Logging in with my new group showed that qsynth was working, although I have yet to hear any sound from it. I tested with pianobooster, musescore, firefox on a site with MIDI, and a few other MIDI apps I thought would make MIDI sound. (I haven't logged out and back in through X yet. I'd prefer not to have to do so.) Am I doing something wrong? Should I go talk with the FluidSynth guys about my particular situation? Do we need to tweak the fluidsynth RPM? (I'm volunteering to help.) -- Jonathan Gardner jgard...@jonathangardner.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: [Fedora] Re: kde slow to start after a crash
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Rex Dieter wrote: If you have desktop effects enabled, try disabling them or try to login using session "kde (failsafe)". If that helps, it's very likely a video driver problem, or at least an incompatibility with one of kwin's configured effects plugins (first one I'd recommend disabling for testing, is the blur plugin). I've the desktop effects enabled but not the blur one. BTW everything was working like a charm before the system crashed (and the crash was due to the "send file" option of skype) but it become extremely slow after such a crash and I suppose the crash has messed up with a cofnig file in the .kde dir but I don't know which one. Walter -- Walter Cazzola, PhD - Associate Professor, DICo, University of Milano E-mail: cazz...@dico.unimi.it Ph.: +39 02 503 16300 Fax: +39 02 503 16253 · · · · · · · · · ... recursive: adjective, see recursive ... · · · · · · · · ·-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: kde slow to start after a crash
Walter Cazzola wrote: > Dear Linuxers, > I've a quite frustrating problem, it is the second time that my PC > freezes and after resetting the PC KDE starts very slowly (it is taking > more or less 20 minutes to be fully loaded and responsive) and reboot > doesn't help. > > The first time I have solved by canceling all the configuration files of > KDE (both .kde and .kderc) and reconfiguring the whole thing. This is an > experience that I'd prefer to avoid. > > Any idea about how to solve the issue? > > My system is FC13 up to date with KDE 4.5.3, nvidia card and kernel > 2.6.34.7-63. I can provide any piece of log if you address me to what to > look for. If you have desktop effects enabled, try disabling them or try to login using session "kde (failsafe)". If that helps, it's very likely a video driver problem, or at least an incompatibility with one of kwin's configured effects plugins (first one I'd recommend disabling for testing, is the blur plugin). -- Rex -- Rex -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
kde slow to start after a crash
Dear Linuxers, I've a quite frustrating problem, it is the second time that my PC freezes and after resetting the PC KDE starts very slowly (it is taking more or less 20 minutes to be fully loaded and responsive) and reboot doesn't help. The first time I have solved by canceling all the configuration files of KDE (both .kde and .kderc) and reconfiguring the whole thing. This is an experience that I'd prefer to avoid. Any idea about how to solve the issue? My system is FC13 up to date with KDE 4.5.3, nvidia card and kernel 2.6.34.7-63. I can provide any piece of log if you address me to what to look for. Thanks for the help Walter -- Walter Cazzola, PhD - Associate Professor, DICo, University of Milano E-mail: cazz...@dico.unimi.it Ph.: +39 02 503 16300 Fax: +39 02 503 16253 · · · · · · · · · ... recursive: adjective, see recursive ... · · · · · · · · ·-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
OfflineIMAP not working
Hi everyone, I was trying out OfflineIMAP as I wanted to try the notmuch email client. But I keep getting this error, WARNING: Error occured attempting to sync account Test: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'replace' I searched around a bit, it seems to be a Fedora specific problem. Does anyone use this on Fedora? How do you make it work if the default Fedora package is not working? I would be grateful if anyone could shed some light on this. Thanks a lot. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Xorg config for dual-monitor Matrox Parhelia
Alex gmail.com> writes: > ... > Here is the Xorg.log output: > > (--) PCI:*(0:3:0:0) 102b:0527:102b:0840 Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA > Parhelia AGP rev 3, Mem @ 0xd800/134217728, 0xe100/8192, BIOS > @ 0x/131072 > Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_alexdesktop-lv_root > nomodeset LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc > KEYTABLE=us rhgb nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau In /etc/grub.conf: > nomodeset LANG= Is Matrox supported by Kernel Mode Setting at all ? Check if it is in there: $ cat /lib/modules/`uname -r`/modules.modesetting If not, leave it there; for that you should get /etc/X11/xorg.conf . > ... nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau Why do you need this ? > Using system-config-display, it properly recognizes the card, but > won't let me configure the dual-head part. $ lspci -v $ man mga $ xrandr $ man xrandr http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Xorg_RandR_1.2 This is an example of how it is done for Nouveau: http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/Randr12 search Google: linux matrox parhelia matrox dual head xrandr > ... JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
On 12/09/2010 11:15 AM, David Liguori wrote: > This all assumes you install Windows first, Fedora second. I've never > tried the other way around but expect it would be difficult. I've seen a number of threads on this on fedoraforum.org. No Windows installer acknowledges the existence of a non-Microsoft OS and always overwrites your boot sector with its own code. You need to use a LiveCD, or an installation disc in rescue mode to re-install Grub, then edit /boot/grub/grub.conf (or, use one of the various links to it if you prefer, but it's all the same file) to add an option for Windows. Windows first, Linux second is by far the easiest way to go. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
On 12/9/2010 12:19 PM, Robert Myers wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Shelby, James wrote: > >> When you install Fedora you choose where to install the boot loader. It was >> installed on the fedora drive instead of the windows drive. It would be >> less risky to add Fedora to the Windows boot loader. >> >> > Many years ago now, I either misunderstood and/or didn't follow > correctly the boot loader instructions given by the installer (RedHat > or Fedora, can't remember now). > > Result: two unbootable disks, just like the OP here. > Which is why, if you value the data on your computer at all, when making a major change like installing a new OS, you should *always* have a complete backup of your system. No pushback, just fact. With today's sub-$100 terabyte plug-in drives and tons of cheap or free backup software it just makes sense. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
On 12/9/2010 12:06 PM, Shelby, James wrote: > > You should be able to modify the boot.ini on your Windows Drive and > add the Fedora bootloader. This wasn’t too difficult but I needed to > do a dd if=/dev/sdb of=linux.bin bs=512 count=1 > > Then copy that bin file over to my windows system. > > With the way Windows seems to not like Linux taking over the > bootloader I still use grub on my windows system with the > understanding that it could very well one day not boot windows. > > I have never, ever, had that happen. I've never tried booting Linux from the Windows bootloader, but Grub is probably more reliable. If you do use the NT Loader you would need to have Grub installed on the first sector of the Linux boot partition, which is one of the two options during install, and is not the default. One could also use a third-party (non-free) loader like Boot Magic or System Commander neither of which is released or supported today. The only commercial boot loader that is, to my knowledge, is Acronis Disk Director, which I tried once and didn't like. Stick with the open-source solution (Grub) and not only will you be supporting the OSS cause (some people claim the boot loader is the central piece of the Linux system) but you'll have a better product. I find the documentation for installing Grub from scratch long and confusing. It's probably simpler just to reinstall Fedora. Go ahead and put it on the second HD but make sure the boot loader is selected to install on the MBR of the first disk, which is always the default. This all assumes you install Windows first, Fedora second. I've never tried the other way around but expect it would be difficult. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Xorg config for dual-monitor Matrox Parhelia
Hi, I have a Matrox Parhelia AGP dual-head card that I can't seem to get to work properly on FC12 i686. Here is the Xorg.log output: (--) PCI:*(0:3:0:0) 102b:0527:102b:0840 Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA Parhelia AGP rev 3, Mem @ 0xd800/134217728, 0xe100/8192, BIOS @ 0x/131072 Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_alexdesktop-lv_root nomodeset LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us rhgb nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau Using system-config-display, it properly recognizes the card, but won't let me configure the dual-head part. I've tried to have it build the xorg.conf on its own, and that didn't help. What is the proper way to configure this card? How well supported is this card? Thanks, Alex -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Shelby, James wrote: > When you install Fedora you choose where to install the boot loader. It was > installed on the fedora drive instead of the windows drive. It would be > less risky to add Fedora to the Windows boot loader. > Many years ago now, I either misunderstood and/or didn't follow correctly the boot loader instructions given by the installer (RedHat or Fedora, can't remember now). Result: two unbootable disks, just like the OP here. I'm going to get a lot of pushback/criticism/bs, but here's my position: Boot sectors and boot loaders are for writers of OS installation disks and viruses. Everyone else should just leave well enough alone. If you can try a change that can be undone, like fiddling with a chain loader in boot.ini, you might want to consider trying that, but *most people won't know how to recover if something goes wrong*. My advice: Let Windows and Linux each install as if the other weren't there and find some other way to choose which disk boots. There are a number of advantages to doing business this way, but the biggest are: 1. You can't screw it up. 2. You don't have two drives/OS's tied together by some boot mechanism that you might want to change at some later time. If the primary disk fails, for example, the other disk will still boot just fine. If you want to move one of the disks to a different machine, you don't have to do anything. How, without fussing with boot sectors and loaders do you choose which disc a machine boots from? These days, every motherboard seems to give me the option of changing the boot order in the setup screen at the very beginning of the boot. It's not a one-click operation, but unlike most other options, if you do it incorrectly, you can always do it again. In the old days, I routinely made a boot floppy for Linux. If I wanted to boot linux, I put the floppy in. If I wanted to boot Windows, I left the floppy out. In theory, you can still make a boot CD, but (so far as I know) it's now a lot harder than mkbootdisk was. There is, at least theoretically, still the possibility of doing something like this. If you're not going to switch back and forth often, then I recommend using the setup screen to choose the boot disk. If you *are* going to switch back and forth often and you have a modern processor, I'm going to wonder why you don't virtualize one or the other so you can use both at the same time, rather than dual booting at all. Robert. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: RE; Pcscd
Alan J. Gagne kirjoitti torstai, 9. joulukuuta 2010 17:14:35: > pcsc-lite Tnx. I tried to look all crons but didn't find anythin to pcscd. Ok, removal. I don't have either any readers, so removed it, let's see did it make any effects. Jarmo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
Another option I use for total isolation is to just press F8 or F12 (which ever allows you to select your boot device) and choose that hard drive. This way you could have a failure on either drive that would not impact or effect anything on the other drive. From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:03 AM To: Fedora Support Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Thanks, I hope this will work From: james.she...@nrel.gov To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:55:48 -0700 Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot When you install Fedora you choose where to install the boot loader. It was installed on the fedora drive instead of the windows drive. It would be less risky to add Fedora to the Windows boot loader. From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:46 AM To: Fedora Support Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Dear James Shelby, Thank you for the help But i don't know how to change the boot loader can you please enplane how to do it Suru From: james.she...@nrel.gov To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:40:11 -0700 Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Change the boot loader or add the chain loader in the XP loader C:\boot.ini file From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:27 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Hi, I have two internal hard drive, and Window XP is installed on it. I tried to install the Fedora 13 on the second hard drive it got properly installed but i can not boot the Fedora. PC directly booting only to the Window, and no option to boot Fedora. then I installed the Fedora on same hard drive on which Window is installed, and now i can boot both the Window and Fedora. but i want to both the window and Fedora of different hard drive, can some one suggest what is going wrong. why i am not able to boot Fedora when i installed it on the second hard drive (On which window is not installed ) Thanks in Advance for help Suru -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
You should be able to modify the boot.ini on your Windows Drive and add the Fedora bootloader. This wasn't too difficult but I needed to do a dd if=/dev/sdb of=linux.bin bs=512 count=1 Then copy that bin file over to my windows system. With the way Windows seems to not like Linux taking over the bootloader I still use grub on my windows system with the understanding that it could very well one day not boot windows. From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:03 AM To: Fedora Support Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Thanks, I hope this will work From: james.she...@nrel.gov To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:55:48 -0700 Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot When you install Fedora you choose where to install the boot loader. It was installed on the fedora drive instead of the windows drive. It would be less risky to add Fedora to the Windows boot loader. From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:46 AM To: Fedora Support Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Dear James Shelby, Thank you for the help But i don't know how to change the boot loader can you please enplane how to do it Suru From: james.she...@nrel.gov To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:40:11 -0700 Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Change the boot loader or add the chain loader in the XP loader C:\boot.ini file From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:27 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Hi, I have two internal hard drive, and Window XP is installed on it. I tried to install the Fedora 13 on the second hard drive it got properly installed but i can not boot the Fedora. PC directly booting only to the Window, and no option to boot Fedora. then I installed the Fedora on same hard drive on which Window is installed, and now i can boot both the Window and Fedora. but i want to both the window and Fedora of different hard drive, can some one suggest what is going wrong. why i am not able to boot Fedora when i installed it on the second hard drive (On which window is not installed ) Thanks in Advance for help Suru -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
network interfaces & aliases question/issue
using sysconfig-network, Ive added an alias to my eth0 to add a fixed IP [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ egrep -E 'DEV|BOOT|IPADD' ifcfg-eth0* ifcfg-eth0:DEVICE=eth0 ifcfg-eth0:BOOTPROTO=dhcp ifcfg-eth0:ONBOOT=yes ifcfg-eth0:1:DEVICE=eth0:1 ifcfg-eth0:1:BOOTPROTO=none ifcfg-eth0:1:IPADDR=192.168.20.2 but it seems I can only have one of them working: (Ive since renamed eth0:1 to eth0_static, thinking there was a problem with ':' in filename) [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ sudo ifup eth0 Active connection state: activating Active connection path: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/5 state: activated Connection activated [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ ip addr show dev eth0 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:24:e8:2a:22:19 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.10.101/24 brd 192.168.10.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::224:e8ff:fe2a:2219/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ sudo ifup eth0_static Active connection state: activated Active connection path: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/6 [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ ip addr show dev eth0 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:24:e8:2a:22:19 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.20.2/24 brd 192.168.20.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::224:e8ff:fe2a:2219/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever I expected 2 inet lines above. And its not just NetoworkManager messing up. Ive taken both interfaces (main, alias) from NM's control, and I get the same *last-upped-interface-wins* behavior [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ ip addr show dev eth0 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:24:e8:2a:22:19 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.10.101/24 brd 192.168.10.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::224:e8ff:fe2a:2219/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ ifup eth0_static Active connection state: activated Active connection path: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/9 [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ ip addr show dev eth0 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:24:e8:2a:22:19 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.20.2/24 brd 192.168.20.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::224:e8ff:fe2a:2219/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ ifup eth0 Active connection state: activating Active connection path: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/10 state: activated Connection activated [j...@groucho network-scripts]$ ip addr show dev eth0 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:24:e8:2a:22:19 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.10.101/24 brd 192.168.10.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::224:e8ff:fe2a:2219/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever btw, is one addressee better than the other ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
Thanks, I hope this will work From: james.she...@nrel.gov To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:55:48 -0700 Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot When you install Fedora you choose where to install the boot loader. It was installed on the fedora drive instead of the windows drive. It would be less risky to add Fedora to the Windows boot loader. From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:46 AM To: Fedora Support Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Dear James Shelby, Thank you for the help But i don't know how to change the boot loader can you please enplane how to do it Suru From: james.she...@nrel.gov To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:40:11 -0700 Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual bootChange the boot loader or add the chain loader in the XP loader C:\boot.ini file From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:27 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Hi, I have two internal hard drive, and Window XP is installed on it. I tried to install the Fedora 13 on the second hard drive it got properly installed but i can not boot the Fedora. PC directly booting only to the Window, and no option to boot Fedora. then I installed the Fedora on same hard drive on which Window is installed, and now i can boot both the Window and Fedora. but i want to both the window and Fedora of different hard drive, can some one suggest what is going wrong. why i am not able to boot Fedora when i installed it on the second hard drive (On which window is not installed ) Thanks in Advance for help Suru -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
When you install Fedora you choose where to install the boot loader. It was installed on the fedora drive instead of the windows drive. It would be less risky to add Fedora to the Windows boot loader. From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:46 AM To: Fedora Support Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Dear James Shelby, Thank you for the help But i don't know how to change the boot loader can you please enplane how to do it Suru From: james.she...@nrel.gov To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:40:11 -0700 Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Change the boot loader or add the chain loader in the XP loader C:\boot.ini file From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:27 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Hi, I have two internal hard drive, and Window XP is installed on it. I tried to install the Fedora 13 on the second hard drive it got properly installed but i can not boot the Fedora. PC directly booting only to the Window, and no option to boot Fedora. then I installed the Fedora on same hard drive on which Window is installed, and now i can boot both the Window and Fedora. but i want to both the window and Fedora of different hard drive, can some one suggest what is going wrong. why i am not able to boot Fedora when i installed it on the second hard drive (On which window is not installed ) Thanks in Advance for help Suru -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 Uses Wrong Resolution on Dell C600 Laptop
Craig Lanning wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 13:01 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: >> Craig Lanning wrote: >>> I have a Dell Latitude C600 which will only display at 800x600. >>> >>> $ lspci -s 01:00.0 >>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility M3 >>> AGP 2x (rev 02) >>> >>> $ xrandr >>> Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600 >>> default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm >>>800x60060.0*56.0 >>>640x48060.0 >>> >>> I tried adding 'nomodeset' to the kernel boot line, but that had no >>> effect. >>> >>> I tried adding 'video=aty128fb:1400x1050' to the kernel boot line, but >>> that, also, had no effect. >>> >>> Is there a way to get this machine to use the 1400x1050 natural >>> resolution of the LDC? >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> >> Hi Craig, >> >> You could try replacing the monitor/screen part in your xorg.conf file >> with what I will add here. It worked for my Fujitsu/Siemens. >> If your hardware is.. >> VendorName "Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] >> BoardName "771/671 PCIE VGA Display Adapter" >> >> Try it anyway it may just work?? >> >> Make copy of your xorg.conf. >> Replace the part mentioned. >> Reboot. >> Should it not work it will boot in console then replace with origanal. >> >> Here follows the lines... >> Johan >>> Section "Monitor" >>> Identifier "Monitor0" >>> VendorName "Monitor Vendor" >>> ModelName"Monitor Model" >>> HorizSync30-107 >>> VertRefresh 50-185 >>> EndSection >>> >>> Section "Device" >>> ### Available Driver options are:- >>> ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", >>> ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" >>> ### [arg]: arg optional >>> Option "ShadowFB" "false" # [] >>> #Option "DefaultRefresh"# [] >>> #Option "ModeSetClearScreen"# [] >>> Identifier "Card0" >>> Driver "vesa" >>> VendorName "Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]" >>> BoardName "771/671 PCIE VGA Display Adapter" >>> BusID "PCI:1:0:0" >>> EndSection > > I can get the vesa driver to run at 1024x768, but what I want is the > r128 driver running at 1400x1050. Part of why I want the r128 driver is > to get the hardware acceleration. > > Anytime I had the r128 driver running at a resolution above 800x600, the > display exhibited some strange folding effects. I think that means that > some of the timing values were wrong. > > Thanks for your help. > > I think my next step is to try installing Fedora 13 and see if I can get > that to work. If it works, maybe I can collect timing values from it. > > Craig > > OK, now I know this works on different screen cards if making use of xorg.conf. Trust you succeed in your efforts. Johan -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
Dear James Shelby, Thank you for the help But i don't know how to change the boot loader can you please enplane how to do it Suru From: james.she...@nrel.gov To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 08:40:11 -0700 Subject: RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Change the boot loader or add the chain loader in the XP loader C:\boot.ini file From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:27 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Hi, I have two internal hard drive, and Window XP is installed on it. I tried to install the Fedora 13 on the second hard drive it got properly installed but i can not boot the Fedora. PC directly booting only to the Window, and no option to boot Fedora. then I installed the Fedora on same hard drive on which Window is installed, and now i can boot both the Window and Fedora. but i want to both the window and Fedora of different hard drive, can some one suggest what is going wrong. why i am not able to boot Fedora when i installed it on the second hard drive (On which window is not installed ) Thanks in Advance for help Suru -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
cant upgrade F13 to F14
Anaconda is telling me I have a dirty partition, and to reboot cleanly, which Ive done several times. The broken aspect here is that anaconda is complaining about /dev/sda1, which is the Dell Utility partition, which should *not* be involved. heres the partition table of the drive holding currrent F13 install Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xf000 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 6 48163+ de Dell Utility /dev/sda2 * 71271101560327 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda31271 62450 4914237447 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda4 62450 121602 4751329285 Extended /dev/sda5 62451 62514 512000 83 Linux /dev/sda6 62514 121602 474618880 8e Linux LVM Is this prob due to boot flag on sda2 ? Grub has no problem booting sda2 or sda5 title Fedora (2.6.34.7-63.fc13.x86_64) root (hd0,4) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.34.7-63.fc13.x86_64 ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_groucho-l v_root rd_LVM_LV=vg_groucho/lv_root rd_LVM_LV=vg_groucho/lv_swap rd_NO_LUKS rd_N O_MD rd_NO_DM LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABL E=us rhgb quiet initrd /initramfs-2.6.34.7-63.fc13.x86_64.img title Windows 7 rootnoverify (hd0,1) chainloader +1 Given that the problem is supposedly with the Dell Utility partition, I regard this as a reportable bug in anaconda. Concur ? Any workarounds ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: desktop configuration question
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 09:55 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On both my F14 machine and my F13 machine the following occurs. If I > have multiple windows open on the desktop and I put the cursor in the > upper right corner of the screen all the widows open on the desktop > appear in on non-overlapping display. This is what all Mac users are > proud happens hitting a key on their keyboards. I like that this > happens. Clicking on one of the now open windows returns too the > previous display with the "clicked on" widow on top. > > This does not happen on all f13 or F14 systems that I have looked at. > There must be some configuration option that makes this happen? How does > one enable and disable this behavior? > -- > === > Save energy: be apathetic. > === > Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net > Aaron, That happens when desktop effects is turned on. Quick & easy way to switch tasks. --Doc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE; Pcscd
> What could cause this? > > Dec 9 03:24:02 oh1mrr pcscd: winscard.c:285:SCardConnect() > Reader E-Gate 0 0 Not Found > Dec 9 03:24:02 oh1mrr pcscd: winscard_svc.c:447:ContextThread() > CONNECT rv=0x8019 for client 2 > > I don't have service pcscd running. Mystery... While I do not know what is causing this message. I can tell you it is triggered by something cron.daily runs. Dec 8 03:48:01 linux2 anacron[5804]: Job `cron.daily' started Dec 8 03:48:18 linux2 pcscd: winscard.c:285:SCardConnect() Reader E-Gate 0 0 Not Found Dec 8 03:48:18 linux2 pcscd: winscard_svc.c:447:ContextThread() CONNECT rv=0x8019 for client 2 I don't have any smart card readers on this system so I just removed pcsc-lite to stop these messages. > Name: pcsc-lite > Arch: i686 > Version : 1.6.4 > Release : 1.fc14 > Size: 151 k > Repo: fedora > Summary : PC/SC Lite smart card framework and applications > URL : http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/ > License : BSD > Description : The purpose of PC/SC Lite is to provide a Windows(R) SCard > interface > : in a very small form factor for communicating to smartcards and > : readers. PC/SC Lite uses the same winscard API as used under > : Windows(R). This package includes the PC/SC Lite daemon, a > resource > : manager that coordinates communications with smart card readers > and > : smart cards that are connected to the system, as well as other > command > : line tools. Alan -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
desktop configuration question
On both my F14 machine and my F13 machine the following occurs. If I have multiple windows open on the desktop and I put the cursor in the upper right corner of the screen all the widows open on the desktop appear in on non-overlapping display. This is what all Mac users are proud happens hitting a key on their keyboards. I like that this happens. Clicking on one of the now open windows returns too the previous display with the "clicked on" widow on top. This does not happen on all f13 or F14 systems that I have looked at. There must be some configuration option that makes this happen? How does one enable and disable this behavior? -- === Save energy: be apathetic. === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: Fedora and window Xp dual boot
Change the boot loader or add the chain loader in the XP loader C:\boot.ini file From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Suraj Polade Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 8:27 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Fedora and window Xp dual boot Hi, I have two internal hard drive, and Window XP is installed on it. I tried to install the Fedora 13 on the second hard drive it got properly installed but i can not boot the Fedora. PC directly booting only to the Window, and no option to boot Fedora. then I installed the Fedora on same hard drive on which Window is installed, and now i can boot both the Window and Fedora. but i want to both the window and Fedora of different hard drive, can some one suggest what is going wrong. why i am not able to boot Fedora when i installed it on the second hard drive (On which window is not installed ) Thanks in Advance for help Suru -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Fedora and window Xp dual boot
Hi, I have two internal hard drive, and Window XP is installed on it. I tried to install the Fedora 13 on the second hard drive it got properly installed but i can not boot the Fedora. PC directly booting only to the Window, and no option to boot Fedora. then I installed the Fedora on same hard drive on which Window is installed, and now i can boot both the Window and Fedora. but i want to both the window and Fedora of different hard drive, can some one suggest what is going wrong. why i am not able to boot Fedora when i installed it on the second hard drive (On which window is not installed ) Thanks in Advance for help Suru -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Pcscd
What could cause this? Dec 9 03:24:02 oh1mrr pcscd: winscard.c:285:SCardConnect() Reader E-Gate 0 0 Not Found Dec 9 03:24:02 oh1mrr pcscd: winscard_svc.c:447:ContextThread() CONNECT rv=0x8019 for client 2 I don't have service pcscd running. Mystery... Jarmo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
admin lewis wrote: > >Hi, >I'm trying to make an hardlink between in this way: >ln /my/path/source/file.txt /blah/blah/file.txt/ >but I've got the following error: >ln: creating hard link `.//' => `/../': Invalid >cross-device link >I've only one root filesystem so it's strange that error about >cross-device.. >the source file is in /home/.. and the link target is in /var/ftp. >the following is my mount > >[r...@mybox vsftpd]# mount >/dev/mapper/vg_mybox-lv_root on / type ext4 (rw) >/home on /home type none (rw,bind) You cannot create a hard link between these two file systems. Linux 'sees' them as two different logical drives with two different super-inodes. It is possible to create a soft-link however. James McKenzie -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 Uses Wrong Resolution on Dell C600 Laptop
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 13:01 +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote: > Craig Lanning wrote: > > I have a Dell Latitude C600 which will only display at 800x600. > > > > $ lspci -s 01:00.0 > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility M3 > > AGP 2x (rev 02) > > > > $ xrandr > > Screen 0: minimum 640 x 480, current 800 x 600, maximum 800 x 600 > > default connected 800x600+0+0 0mm x 0mm > >800x60060.0*56.0 > >640x48060.0 > > > > I tried adding 'nomodeset' to the kernel boot line, but that had no > > effect. > > > > I tried adding 'video=aty128fb:1400x1050' to the kernel boot line, but > > that, also, had no effect. > > > > Is there a way to get this machine to use the 1400x1050 natural > > resolution of the LDC? > > > > Craig > > > > > Hi Craig, > > You could try replacing the monitor/screen part in your xorg.conf file > with what I will add here. It worked for my Fujitsu/Siemens. > If your hardware is.. > VendorName "Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] > BoardName "771/671 PCIE VGA Display Adapter" > > Try it anyway it may just work?? > > Make copy of your xorg.conf. > Replace the part mentioned. > Reboot. > Should it not work it will boot in console then replace with origanal. > > Here follows the lines... > Johan > > Section "Monitor" > > Identifier "Monitor0" > > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > > ModelName"Monitor Model" > > HorizSync30-107 > > VertRefresh 50-185 > > EndSection > > > > Section "Device" > > ### Available Driver options are:- > > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > > ### [arg]: arg optional > > Option "ShadowFB" "false" # [] > > #Option "DefaultRefresh"# [] > > #Option "ModeSetClearScreen"# [] > > Identifier "Card0" > > Driver "vesa" > > VendorName "Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS]" > > BoardName "771/671 PCIE VGA Display Adapter" > > BusID "PCI:1:0:0" > > EndSection I can get the vesa driver to run at 1024x768, but what I want is the r128 driver running at 1400x1050. Part of why I want the r128 driver is to get the hardware acceleration. Anytime I had the r128 driver running at a resolution above 800x600, the display exhibited some strange folding effects. I think that means that some of the timing values were wrong. Thanks for your help. I think my next step is to try installing Fedora 13 and see if I can get that to work. If it works, maybe I can collect timing values from it. Craig -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Setup local repo for F14 install packages. What am I doing wrong?
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I guess I want package level priorities but the plugin only seems to >> work at the repo level. > > Use "cost" for your local repo. Default is 1000. (man yum.conf). Choose > something like 500: > > [repo name...] > name=... > baseurl=... > enabled=1 > gpgcheck=1 > cost=500 That's what I was looking for. It seems rather kludgy to rely on yum sorting the repo's and using them in a particular order even though that's what yum-plugins-local does. Thanks, Richard -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Kernel error reported in Logwatch
This is a 'new' HP running Fedora 12 as my mail server. Yeah, I know that F12 is eol, but I am 'stuck' on this until we get everything worked out for the F14 port, probably a couple months. Original Message Subject:Logwatch for klovia.htt-consult.com (Linux) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:13:05 -0500 (EST) From: logwa...@klovia.htt-consult.com To: r...@klovia.htt-consult.com ### Logwatch 7.3.6 (05/19/07) Processing Initiated: Thu Dec 9 03:13:05 2010 Date Range Processed: yesterday ( 2010-Dec-08 ) Period is day. Detail Level of Output: 0 Type of Output: unformatted Logfiles for Host: klovia.htt-consult.com ## - Kernel Begin WARNING: Kernel Errors Present ACPI Error (dsfield-0143): ...: 6 Time(s) ACPI Error (psparse-0537): ...: 6 Time(s) ACPI: Marking method _OSC as Serialized because of AE_ALREADY_EXISTS error ...: 1 Time(s) -- Kernel End - ## Logwatch End # What do these errors mean? This ssytem was rebooted once during this time period (for a physical move). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:08 AM, admin lewis wrote: > 2010/12/9 JB >> admin lewis gmail.com> writes: >> >> A hard link is basically a link to the i-node number of the original file. >> >> i-node numbers are not portable across different disks. >> >> Hard links can only be created to files on the same file system. >> >> To create a hard link, the original file and the link file should exist in >> the >> same partition. >> >> LVM is a logical superstructure consisting of different physical >> partitions on same or different disks. > > different phisical partitions ? > why ... the phisical partitions are those: > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 * 63 409662 204800 83 Linux > /dev/sda2 409663 488392064 243991201 83 Linux > > maybe u mean virtual partitions... ? Hard links can't cross fliesystems because two hard-linked files point to the same inode. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Linux Expert The Manual
Hi, I'm writing (with a lot of co-autors) a wiki on Linux, Unix and Open Source. I want extend the invite to the members of this mailinglist in order to contribute. Please see the following url: http://www.francescoprincipe.com/linuxexpert/ . Regards, F.P. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
2010/12/9 JB > admin lewis gmail.com> writes: > > > ... > A hard link is basically a link to the i-node number of the original file. > > i-node numbers are not portable across different disks. > > Hard links can only be created to files on the same file system. > > To create a hard link, the original file and the link file should exist in > the > same partition. > > LVM is a logical superstructure consisting of different physical partitions > on > same or different disks. > > JB > > > different phisical partitions ? why ... the phisical partitions are those: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 63 409662 204800 83 Linux /dev/sda2 409663 488392064 243991201 83 Linux maybe u mean virtual partitions... ? lewis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Is there a problem with bigloo-libs?
Since installed F14 I've been seeing a lot of these in the console output of 'yum update': /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloofthread_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloomultimedia_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloosqlite_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbiglootext_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloogstreamer_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloopackrat_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloopkglib_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloocrypto_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloosrfi1_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloocalendar_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloopthread_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbiglooweb_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloomail_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib64/libbigloopkgcomp_es-3.4a.so is not a symbolic link It's true: $ dir /usr/lib64/ | grep es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 69792 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloocalendar_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 69528 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloocrypto_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 93240 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloofthread_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 221368 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloogstreamer_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 71824 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloomail_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 160640 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloomultimedia_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 31712 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloopackrat_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 24864 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloopkgcomp_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 51576 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloopkglib_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 41184 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloopthread_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 56672 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloosqlite_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 36248 Jul 2 13:43 libbigloosrfi1_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 24440 Jul 2 13:43 libbiglootext_es-3.4a.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 84568 Jul 2 13:43 libbiglooweb_es-3.4a.so The only libbigloo*.so soft links in /usr/lib64/ are these: lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloobdl_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloobdl_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 27 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloocalendar_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloocalendar_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloocrypto_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloocrypto_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 26 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloofthread_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloofthread_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 28 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloogstreamer_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloogstreamer_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloomail_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloomail_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 29 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloomultimedia_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloomultimedia_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 26 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloopackrat_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloopackrat_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 26 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloopkgcomp_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloopkgcomp_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloopkglib_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloopkglib_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 26 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloopthread_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloopthread_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 25 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloosqlite_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloosqlite_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 24 Nov 15 07:59 libbigloosrfi1_u-3.4a.so -> libbigloosrfi1_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 Nov 15 07:59 libbiglootext_u-3.4a.so -> libbiglootext_s-3.4a.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 Nov 15 07:59 libbiglooweb_u-3.4a.so -> libbiglooweb_s-3.4a.so Other than yum's whining, I haven't noticed anything else amiss. Is there a problem with the bigloo-libs-3.4a-1.fc14.x86_64 package, or is this just another warning like the /etc/udev/rules scrum that takes place every time the system boots up? --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
admin lewis gmail.com> writes: > ... A hard link is basically a link to the i-node number of the original file. i-node numbers are not portable across different disks. Hard links can only be created to files on the same file system. To create a hard link, the original file and the link file should exist in the same partition. LVM is a logical superstructure consisting of different physical partitions on same or different disks. JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
2010/12/9 JB > admin lewis gmail.com> writes: > > > ... > Can you show us this so we can see permissions, etc ? > # cat /proc/mounts > > > [le...@whitebox ~]$ cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0 /sys /sys sysfs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0 udev /dev devtmpfs rw,seclabel,relatime,size=1008508k,nr_inodes=213191,mode=755 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,seclabel,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0 /dev/mapper/vg_whitebox-lv_root / ext4 rw,seclabel,relatime,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 none /selinux selinuxfs rw,relatime 0 0 udev /dev devtmpfs rw,seclabel,relatime,size=1008508k,nr_inodes=213191,mode=755 0 0 /proc/bus/usb /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw,relatime 0 0 /dev/sda1 /boot ext4 rw,seclabel,relatime,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc rw,relatime 0 0 /dev/mapper/vg_whitebox-lv_root /tmp ext4 rw,seclabel,relatime,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 /dev/mapper/vg_whitebox-lv_root /var/tmp ext4 rw,seclabel,relatime,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 /dev/mapper/vg_whitebox-lv_root /home ext4 rw,seclabel,relatime,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0 fusectl /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw,relatime 0 0 gvfs-fuse-daemon /home/lewis/.gvfs fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=500,group_id=500 0 0 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
admin lewis gmail.com> writes: > ... Can you show us this so we can see permissions, etc ? # cat /proc/mounts JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: 5 Beginner questions regarding Fedora 14
Tim: >> Until you come across some site that will only work with the Adobe flash >> software... Annoying, I know. But if you come across a Flash site that >> doesn't work, that's one thing you're going to have to investigate. James Mckenzie: > I turned off this craptastic piece of garbage on my system. If a web > master cannot be bothered to write proper html, I cannot be bothered > to watch it. Fanatastic waste of system resources and a waste of > bandwidth. As a general rule, I don't disagree. I block Flash on all sites, by default. It's usually annoying advertising, several of them, and it bogs my computer down. However, there are sites which do make good use of Flash. Sites where animation was the reason for viewing them, etc. And you can get stuck by some essential site (for you, such as your bank) needing Flash before you can do what you want to do. So it's handy to have it around. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
2010/12/9 Jussi Lehtola > On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:45:48 +0100 > admin lewis wrote: > > > Hi, > > I'm trying to make an hardlink between in this way: > > ln /my/path/source/file.txt /blah/blah/file.txt/ > > but I've got the following error: > > ln: creating hard link `.//' => `/../': > > Invalid cross-device link > > I've only one root filesystem so it's strange that error about > > cross-device.. > > the source file is in /home/.. and the link target is > > in /var/ftp. the following is my mount > > > > [r...@mybox vsftpd]# mount > > /dev/mapper/vg_mybox-lv_root on / type ext4 (rw) > (clip) > > /home on /home type none (rw,bind) > > This here is the probable cause of your problem... > yep I understand... but why I have a mountpoint mounted over the same mountpoint with only one partition mounted on / ? -- Admin Lewis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: HardLink ?
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:45:48 +0100 admin lewis wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to make an hardlink between in this way: > ln /my/path/source/file.txt /blah/blah/file.txt/ > but I've got the following error: > ln: creating hard link `.//' => `/../': > Invalid cross-device link > I've only one root filesystem so it's strange that error about > cross-device.. > the source file is in /home/.. and the link target is > in /var/ftp. the following is my mount > > [r...@mybox vsftpd]# mount > /dev/mapper/vg_mybox-lv_root on / type ext4 (rw) (clip) > /home on /home type none (rw,bind) This here is the probable cause of your problem... -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
HardLink ?
Hi, I'm trying to make an hardlink between in this way: ln /my/path/source/file.txt /blah/blah/file.txt/ but I've got the following error: ln: creating hard link `.//' => `/../': Invalid cross-device link I've only one root filesystem so it's strange that error about cross-device.. the source file is in /home/.. and the link target is in /var/ftp. the following is my mount [r...@mybox vsftpd]# mount /dev/mapper/vg_mybox-lv_root on / type ext4 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,rootcontext="system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0") /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) /tmp on /tmp type none (rw,bind) /var/tmp on /var/tmp type none (rw,bind) /home on /home type none (rw,bind) fusectl on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/myuser/.gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=lewis) and [r...@whitebox vsftpd]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg_mybox-lv_root 226G 85G 139G 39% / tmpfs 992M 576K 991M 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 194M 90M 105M 47% /boot any ideas ? -- Thanks Lewis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: can't download fedora 64bit dvd iso file
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: > Dan, > > You could try using the "meat" of that link without the prefix: > > > http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/14/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso > > which will actually initiate an FTP download from a mirror site. > Windows' FTP has been known to be problematic for very large files > because (at least in the past) an interrupted download could not be > resumed. > > I would recommend using IE8 for what it's good at, then another utility > for the main haul. Fetch cwRsync from: > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sereds/files/cwRsync/4.0.5/cwRsync_4.0.5_Installer.zip/download > > This is a Windows version of the rsync utility, a workhorse of the file > transfer variety if there ever was one. Assuming this latest cwRsync > uses the same command line options as rsync, this *LONG* command line at > an MS-DOS prompt will download the F14 DVD ISO file to the current > directory: > > C:> cwRsync -tvxzP rsync:// > download.fedora.redhat.com/fedora-linux-releases/14/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso. > > Don't forget the trailing " ." space-dot destination. If you're curious, > the options in that command line are defined as follows: > > -t preserve modification times > -v increase verbosity > -x don’t cross filesystem boundaries > -z compress file data during the transfer > -P same as --partial --progress > --partial keep partially transferred files > --progress show progress during transfer > > On a 12Mbps connection this download should take about 75 minutes. If > the download is interrupted for any reason, you can re-run the same > command line and it will pick up where it left off. rsync is VERY > tenacious and guarantees 100% error-free delivery. > > Good luck. > > --Doc Savage > Fairview Heights, IL > > > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 23:48 -0700, Dan Willenberg wrote: > > using iexploder8 > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/en/download-splash?file=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/14/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso > > > > link tries to connect, then nothing, it claims to be direct download > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: can't download fedora 64bit dvd iso file > > > From: dsav...@peaknet.net > > > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:29:31 -0600 > > > > > > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 03:41 -0700, Dan Willenberg wrote: > > > > > > > > every time I try, I just get file not found. > > > > never had a problem with earlier versions > > > > > > Dan, > > > > > > Where are you trying to download it from, and what are you using to > > > fetch it? > > > > > > --Doc Savage > > > Fairview Heights, IL > > > > You can also use wget (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/wget.htm ) to download files. Use wget ftp:// download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/14/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso If the download fails resume with wget -c ftp:// download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/14/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso Remember that DVD images can exceed the 4GB limitation of FAT32 formatted drives. Make sure you are saving to a NTFS formatted drive. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: failed to synchronize hardware clock
JB gmail.com> writes: > ... If you want auto-synchronization, check/enable/restart ntpdate service in System - Admin - Services JB -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
RE: can't download fedora 64bit dvd iso file
Dan, You could try using the "meat" of that link without the prefix: http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/14/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso which will actually initiate an FTP download from a mirror site. Windows' FTP has been known to be problematic for very large files because (at least in the past) an interrupted download could not be resumed. I would recommend using IE8 for what it's good at, then another utility for the main haul. Fetch cwRsync from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sereds/files/cwRsync/4.0.5/cwRsync_4.0.5_Installer.zip/download This is a Windows version of the rsync utility, a workhorse of the file transfer variety if there ever was one. Assuming this latest cwRsync uses the same command line options as rsync, this *LONG* command line at an MS-DOS prompt will download the F14 DVD ISO file to the current directory: C:> cwRsync -tvxzP rsync://download.fedora.redhat.com/fedora-linux-releases/14/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso . Don't forget the trailing " ." space-dot destination. If you're curious, the options in that command line are defined as follows: -t preserve modification times -v increase verbosity -x don’t cross filesystem boundaries -z compress file data during the transfer -P same as --partial --progress --partial keep partially transferred files --progress show progress during transfer On a 12Mbps connection this download should take about 75 minutes. If the download is interrupted for any reason, you can re-run the same command line and it will pick up where it left off. rsync is VERY tenacious and guarantees 100% error-free delivery. Good luck. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 23:48 -0700, Dan Willenberg wrote: > using iexploder8 > > http://fedoraproject.org/en/download-splash?file=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/14/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso > > link tries to connect, then nothing, it claims to be direct download > > > > > > > Subject: Re: can't download fedora 64bit dvd iso file > > From: dsav...@peaknet.net > > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:29:31 -0600 > > > > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 03:41 -0700, Dan Willenberg wrote: > > > > > > every time I try, I just get file not found. > > > never had a problem with earlier versions > > > > Dan, > > > > Where are you trying to download it from, and what are you using to > > fetch it? > > > > --Doc Savage > > Fairview Heights, IL > > > > -- > > users mailing list > > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
