Re: Evolution consuming 50% cpu on FC 16

2012-05-28 Thread hostmaster
Hi,

Tried your script. It seems to have worked. Evolution is 0% cpu.

Thanks a lot.



On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 23:58 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 07:39 +0800, hostmaster wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > My Inbox has about 20+ sub-folders. If I click on the Inbox folder the cpu 
> > consumption would spike to 50% and stays there. 
> > When I click on any of the sub-folders the cpu will go down to 0%.
> > 
> > My Evolution is converted from an old version(FC11). I converted it by 
> > first creating a backup and then do a restore. I receive email 
> > by 'Local Delivery' and send email using 'Sendmail'.
> > 
> > Any idea what is causing the 50+% spike in CPU?
> 
> You might have broken index files. It can sometimes help to "vacuum" the
> database. Here's a script I posted recently:
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> 
> cd ~/.local/share/evolution/mail/
> for i in `find . -name folders.db`
> do
> echo "Rebuilding Table $i"
> sqlite3 $i "vacuum;"
> done
> 
> Important: this is for Evo 3.x. Earlier versions used a different file
> structure. Also, this should be done only after stopping Evo completely
> ("evolution --force-shutdown").
> 
> If that doesn't work, ask on the Evolution list:
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
> 
> poc
> 

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


uuidd fails to start

2012-05-28 Thread JD

Booting with every fc16 kernel, I always get this failure.
Boot.log shows
Failed to start LSB: UUID daemon  FAILED
See 'systemctl status uuidd.service' for details.
# systemctl status uuidd.service
uuidd.service - LSB: UUID daemon
  Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/uuidd)
  Active: failed since Tue, 29 May 2012 00:06:00 -0600
 Process: 1003 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/uuidd start (code=exited, 
status=1/FAILURE)

  CGroup: name=systemd:/system/uuidd.service

So, I tried to start it manually:

# uuidd
Failed to open/create /var/run/uuidd/uuidd.pid: No such file or directory

Even if I create dir /var/run/uuidd and restart the system,
it fails the same way, because the dirs in /var/run get removed.
But I can start it manually, if I create the dir and invoke uuidd.
Of course, it does not survive a reboot.

Also, I searched the system for uuidd.service

# locate uuidd.service
#

# find /lib/systemd /etc/systemd -name uuidd.\*
#

So, where is this service file? Or is it created dynamically at boot time?

Googling for uuidd.service shows some early development mods containing
uuidd.service.in , but it is not in latest source code of 
util-linux-2.20.1-2.3.fc16.src.rpm.


I anyone has a solution or a clue, please share.




--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Evolution consuming 50% cpu on FC 16

2012-05-28 Thread hostmaster
Hi,


> does this happen with other 'top' folders or is it just your Inbox
folder?

The Inbox is the the top folder with 20+ sub-folders. Message will go in
to the Inbox folders and moved to the sub-folders by message filters.

> being that Inbox folder for accounts receive _all_ emails first, it
may be that a filter routine is constantly checking Inbox for new
emails.

I have quite a number of filters but I don't experience this in my
previous version of Evolution.



On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 00:25 +, g wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 11:39 PM, hostmaster wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > My Inbox has about 20+ sub-folders. If I click on the Inbox folder the cpu
> > consumption would spike to 50% and stays there. When I click on any of the
> > sub-folders the cpu will go down to 0%.
> >
> > My Evolution is converted from an old version(FC11). I converted it by first
> > creating a backup and then do a restore. I receive email by 'Local Delivery'
> > and send email using 'Sendmail'.
> > 
> > Any idea what is causing the 50+% spike in CPU?
> -=-
> 
> does this happen with other 'top' folders or is it just your Inbox folder?
> 
> being that Inbox folder for accounts receive _all_ emails first, it may
> be that a filter routine is constantly checking Inbox for new emails.
> 
> if high usage does not occur with other 'top' folders, Inbox subfolders to
> another 'top' folder.
> 
> i use thunderbird for email client and subscribe to thunderbird support
> list, where there are a lot of posters complaining about one problem or
> another with an Inbox that has subfolders.
> 
> when they move subfolders to another part of 'tree', problems go away.
> 
> and yes, just like it may be with evolution, there are some users who
> have Inbox subfolders and never have problems.
> 
> checking other 'top' folders and moving subfolders is an easy thing to
> do and may cure your problem.
> 

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Evolution consuming 50% cpu on FC 16

2012-05-28 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 07:39 +0800, hostmaster wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> My Inbox has about 20+ sub-folders. If I click on the Inbox folder the cpu 
> consumption would spike to 50% and stays there. 
> When I click on any of the sub-folders the cpu will go down to 0%.
> 
> My Evolution is converted from an old version(FC11). I converted it by first 
> creating a backup and then do a restore. I receive email 
> by 'Local Delivery' and send email using 'Sendmail'.
> 
> Any idea what is causing the 50+% spike in CPU?

You might have broken index files. It can sometimes help to "vacuum" the
database. Here's a script I posted recently:

#!/bin/sh

cd ~/.local/share/evolution/mail/
for i in `find . -name folders.db`
do
echo "Rebuilding Table $i"
sqlite3 $i "vacuum;"
done

Important: this is for Evo 3.x. Earlier versions used a different file
structure. Also, this should be done only after stopping Evo completely
("evolution --force-shutdown").

If that doesn't work, ask on the Evolution list:
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

poc

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Dialup users and keeping a system updated

2012-05-28 Thread Chuck Peters
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Frank Murphy  wrote:
> On 21/05/12 07:49, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>> When asked if this is OK, say No.  Should then get a line that reads
>> something
>> similar to...
>>
>> yum load-transaction /tmp/yum_save_tx.2012-05-21.14-46.yuA8Tw.yumtx
>
>> Take the yum_save_tx.2012-05-21.14-46.yuA8Tw.yumtx to the system with the
>> fast
>> connection and run...
>>
>> yum load-transaction /tmp/yum_save_tx.2012-05-21.14-41.O26_49.yumtx
>> --downloadonly
>>
>> The files are saved in /var/cache/yum/i386/16/updates/packages  (more or
>> less)
>>
>
> You can also say where to download the files:
> yum load-transaction /tmp/yum_save_tx.2012-05-21.14-41.O26_49.yumtx
> --downloadonly --downloaddir=/where_you/want_to/save_the_files

I tried and it didn't work.
[cp@fedora tmp]$ sudo yum load-transaction
/tmp/yum_save_tx-2012-05-21-21-54cbd9xI.yumtx --downloadonly
[sudo] password for cp:
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Error: rpmdb ver mismatched saved transaction version,  aborting.

Perhaps it is because my friend is running Fedora 15 and I have Fedora 16.
Hopefully it will work once we both upgrade to Fedora 17 in the near future.

My earlier comment about needing 300MB of updates was clearly off.  I am
updating her nvidia right now Total download size: 23 M and the updates I
just finished were over 600MB.

Transaction Summary
===
Install   8 Package(s)
Upgrade 295 Package(s)
Remove4 Package(s)

Total size: 603 M
Total download size: 22 M

Thanks,
Chuck
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: dracut in kernel-3.3.5-2.fc16.i686 and kernel-3.3.6-3.fc16.i686 fails to mount root

2012-05-28 Thread JD

On 05/28/2012 09:41 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:

On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 21:45 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

Don't think it's you, although it doesn't seem to be universal. Some
hardware
seems to trigger a different output from the blkid calc, while most
work. That's
only based on three upgrades, two worked fine, one did as you say,
haven't
gotten to building a 3.4 kernel yet, on my to-do list for the weekend.

I always have a similar problem when the kernel on an old i686 laptop is
upgraded, but never have it on my other machine, which has x86_64
hardware.  I can always correct it by running grub2-mkconfig to generate
a new /boot/grub2/grub.cfg file.  This has been reported in:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818715
There are other odd differences in the startup menu.

jon


I have made a comment for 822792 that when yum update
had brought in kernel-3.3.5-2.fc16.i686, it created a bad
uuid for the search line in grub.cfg, but left the Linux line
with the correct uuid. So, I was never able to boot
kernel-3.3.5-2.fc16.i686 and it had not occurred to me to
examine grub.cfg at that time. Ditto after yum update
brought in kernel-3.3.6-3.fc16.i686, the same thing happened
and I had not looked at grub.cfg. I only decided to examine it
closely yesterday (05/27) just after midnight. I posted my
finding in bugzilla.
So, I believe installing kernel-3.3.5-2.fc16.i686 mad the
bad uuid entry, and kernel-3.3.6-3.fc16.i686 made the mistake
of using the kernel-3.3.5-2 menu entry as a template, and made
the same erroneous entry (that's my guess).
Afcter I deleted both kernels (rpm -e) and ran yum update
which brought in kernel-3.3.6-3, I checked grub.cfg and
it had the correct uuid and I was able to boot it.
I would like to verify my guess re: kernel-3.3.5-2, but I cannot
find the rpm for it anywhere online.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Evolution consuming 50% cpu on FC 16

2012-05-28 Thread g

On 05/28/2012 11:39 PM, hostmaster wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> My Inbox has about 20+ sub-folders. If I click on the Inbox folder the cpu
> consumption would spike to 50% and stays there. When I click on any of the
> sub-folders the cpu will go down to 0%.
>
> My Evolution is converted from an old version(FC11). I converted it by first
> creating a backup and then do a restore. I receive email by 'Local Delivery'
> and send email using 'Sendmail'.
> 
> Any idea what is causing the 50+% spike in CPU?
-=-

does this happen with other 'top' folders or is it just your Inbox folder?

being that Inbox folder for accounts receive _all_ emails first, it may
be that a filter routine is constantly checking Inbox for new emails.

if high usage does not occur with other 'top' folders, Inbox subfolders to
another 'top' folder.

i use thunderbird for email client and subscribe to thunderbird support
list, where there are a lot of posters complaining about one problem or
another with an Inbox that has subfolders.

when they move subfolders to another part of 'tree', problems go away.

and yes, just like it may be with evolution, there are some users who
have Inbox subfolders and never have problems.

checking other 'top' folders and moving subfolders is an easy thing to
do and may cure your problem.

-- 

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

*please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*


in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better.
So I installed Linux.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Evolution consuming 50% cpu on FC 16

2012-05-28 Thread Joe Zeff

On 05/28/2012 04:39 PM, hostmaster wrote:

Any idea what is causing the 50+% spike in CPU?


I don't use Evolution, but I do have a question: is it possible to 
compact its folders, and if so, how long has it been since you did?


I ask because most email programs today organize the folders as 
databases, and when you delete a message, all that happens is that the 
message is marked as deleted; it isn't actually removed.  As time goes 
on, it can take your client more and more time working its way through 
the deleted messages to find the ones you want to see.  Compacting the 
folders rewrite them with all of the deleted cruft left out, making it 
much more efficient.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Evolution consuming 50% cpu on FC 16

2012-05-28 Thread hostmaster
Hi,

My Inbox has about 20+ sub-folders. If I click on the Inbox folder the cpu 
consumption would spike to 50% and stays there. 
When I click on any of the sub-folders the cpu will go down to 0%.

My Evolution is converted from an old version(FC11). I converted it by first 
creating a backup and then do a restore. I receive email 
by 'Local Delivery' and send email using 'Sendmail'.

Any idea what is causing the 50+% spike in CPU?

Thanks.

Al




-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: partition question

2012-05-28 Thread Phil Dobbin

On 05/27/2012 08:45 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:



I've Googled this question quite extensively & before I proceed I
thought I'd ask for an opinion. It's quite a common predicament so
apologies in advance if I'm creating noise.

I have a machine running Fedora 16 X86_64 which is a recent addition &
now I need to use some of the unused space on the HD for another OS
(CentOS). When I originally installed Verne, I just accepted Anaconda's
"replace existing Linux system" so I have this:


[snip]

Many thanks to Geoffrey, Bryn & Peter for their advice & assistance with 
this matter. That's given me food for thought.


I'll choose a method & get back to you to let you know how I get on.


Cheers,

  Phil...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: compiling mtpfs ?

2012-05-28 Thread Ed Greshko
On 05/29/2012 04:35 AM, Jim wrote:
> Requested 'libmtp >= 1.1.0' but version of libmtp is 1.0.6
>
> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> installed software in a non-standard prefix.
>
> Alternatively, you may set the environment variables MTP_CFLAGS
> and MTP_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> See the pkg-config man page for more details. 

You are using F15.  All of the above is true.  F15 currently has
libmtp-1.0.6-5.fc15.i686.rpm.

Your choices.

Use an older version of mtpfs which uses an earlier version of libmtp

or

Upgrade to, at least, F16 which has libmtp-1.1.3-2.fc16.i686

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: compiling mtpfs ?

2012-05-28 Thread Mark LaPierre

On 05/28/2012 04:35 PM, Jim wrote:

Fedora 15


[root@BigOne mtpfs-1.1]# ./configure
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for FUSE... yes
checking for MTP... no
configure: error: Package requirements (libmtp >= 1.1.0) were not met:

Requested 'libmtp >= 1.1.0' but version of libmtp is 1.0.6

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables MTP_CFLAGS
and MTP_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.



Did you try

# yum update libmtp


--
_
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registerd Linux user No #267004
www.counter.li.org

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


compiling mtpfs ?

2012-05-28 Thread Jim

Fedora 15


[root@BigOne mtpfs-1.1]# ./configure
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for FUSE... yes
checking for MTP... no
configure: error: Package requirements (libmtp >= 1.1.0) were not met:

Requested 'libmtp >= 1.1.0' but version of libmtp is 1.0.6

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables MTP_CFLAGS
and MTP_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

2012-05-28 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Paul Allen Newell  said:
> Problem is solved as far as I am concerned, even though I am certain 
> there is probably some way to get a unique token. Since my goal is to 
> get the machine up and running so I can be a user on it, I learned from 
> all the material offered that it is best to cut my losses.

If you are looking for the address of the default interface, you can
fetch based on the default route.  This should work on most systems, as
almost all have a default route, and few have more than one.

- get the default route entry:
  ip route list match 0.0.0.0

- get just the device name:
  ip route list match 0.0.0.0 | sed 's/.* dev \([^ ]*\).*/\1/'

- list the address(es) on the default device:
  ip addr list $(ip route list match 0.0.0.0 | sed 's/.* dev \([^ ]*\).*/\1/')

-- 
Chris Adams 
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

2012-05-28 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:

> In the old(ish) times, you had to be in the "uucp" group to accomplish the
> same.


I used a modem in SUSE and also Linspire 4.0, and I don't remember having
to fiddle with user permissions... but that was a long long time ago (last
time I had to use dial-up).

FC

-- 
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary
act
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: how to capture flash, etc

2012-05-28 Thread Peter Gueckel
JD wrote:

> firefox add-on... conversion after download

I don't like to use add-ons, unless they come directly from Mozilla.

clive seems to meet my needs best.

I don't bother with conversion, since most applications (vlc, smplayer, etc) 
play flv 
files. The few times I did try to convert (with kdenlive, avidemux), I noticed 
a 
significant and unacceptable loss in video quality and the files were often 
larger, 
despite the inferior quality.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: The death of Hibernate?

2012-05-28 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 28.05.2012, Clemens Eisserer wrote: 

> Stop this! (please)

That is something you can do by yourself, you don't need any others to
do it for you. Just don't read this thread. It's that easy. Filter it
out, filter the people contributing to it, whatever..

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: KDE Network Manager Applet goes weird

2012-05-28 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 09:50 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> After last night's upgrade, the Network Manager applet in the KDE tray
> now appears as a red X.  Clicking on it produces a message that the
> network manager isn't running, and that I should please start it.  In
> fact networking seems to be running just fine.  Has anyone else seen
> this?
> 
> System is Fedora-16 running on x86_64 hardware; KDE version 4.8.3.  The
> applet doesn't identify itself; here's the log of the Network Manager
> upgrade:
> May 27 23:38:13 Updated: 
> 1:NetworkManager-glib-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64
> May 27 23:38:18 Updated: 
> 1:NetworkManager-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64
> May 27 23:38:19 Updated: 
> 1:NetworkManager-gtk-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64
> May 27 23:38:20 Updated: 
> 1:NetworkManager-gnome-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64
> May 27 23:38:21 Updated: 
> 1:NetworkManager-devel-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64

There appear to be problems with the Network Manager itself.  I don't
know much about it, since networking on my system has always "just
worked" (tm); but here's a log of a little console activity:

1006 ~ $ nm-online
Connecting...1s
1007 ~ $ echo $?
1

1010 ~ $ nm-tool

** (process:10284): WARNING **: Could not initialize NMClient 
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager: Method "GetAll" with signature "s" on 
interface "org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" doesn't exist


NetworkManager Tool

State: unknown


** (process:10284): WARNING **: error: could not connect to NetworkManager
1011 ~ $ ping weather
PING weather (192.168.2.3) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from weather (192.168.2.3): icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.942 ms
64 bytes from weather (192.168.2.3): icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=0.280 ms
64 bytes from weather (192.168.2.3): icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=0.581 ms




-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


KDE Network Manager Applet goes weird

2012-05-28 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
After last night's upgrade, the Network Manager applet in the KDE tray
now appears as a red X.  Clicking on it produces a message that the
network manager isn't running, and that I should please start it.  In
fact networking seems to be running just fine.  Has anyone else seen
this?

System is Fedora-16 running on x86_64 hardware; KDE version 4.8.3.  The
applet doesn't identify itself; here's the log of the Network Manager
upgrade:

May 27 23:38:13 Updated: 
1:NetworkManager-glib-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64
May 27 23:38:18 Updated: 
1:NetworkManager-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64
May 27 23:38:19 Updated: 
1:NetworkManager-gtk-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64
May 27 23:38:20 Updated: 
1:NetworkManager-gnome-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64
May 27 23:38:21 Updated: 
1:NetworkManager-devel-0.9.4-6.git20120521.fc16.x86_64

jon



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: dracut in kernel-3.3.5-2.fc16.i686 and kernel-3.3.6-3.fc16.i686 fails to mount root

2012-05-28 Thread Jonathan Ryshpan
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 21:45 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Don't think it's you, although it doesn't seem to be universal. Some
> hardware 
> seems to trigger a different output from the blkid calc, while most
> work. That's 
> only based on three upgrades, two worked fine, one did as you say,
> haven't 
> gotten to building a 3.4 kernel yet, on my to-do list for the weekend.
I always have a similar problem when the kernel on an old i686 laptop is
upgraded, but never have it on my other machine, which has x86_64
hardware.  I can always correct it by running grub2-mkconfig to generate
a new /boot/grub2/grub.cfg file.  This has been reported in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818715
There are other odd differences in the startup menu.

jon

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: The death of Hibernate?

2012-05-28 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Stop this! (please)

2012/5/28 Joel Rees :
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Reindl Harald  wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 26.05.2012 07:45, schrieb Joel Rees:
> Do you understand the reason you still set up swap, even though your
> entire workload working set fits into RAM?

 there is no single reason if you have enough RAM
>>>
>>> In an ideal world, RAM would not consume energy.
>>>
>>> This is a real world, what energy I have on the train is a small
>>> Lithium ion battery.
>>
>> why in the world do you wake up this thread after weeks again?
>
> The after three weeks part is that I have a day job and a night job,
> and trying to keep up with the mailing list is not top priority for
> me.
>
> The wake it up part, I guess, is that I really, really think hibernate
> is important.
>
> And technical accuracy is also important to me.
>
> You contribute some good things to the list, Riendl, but your field of
> vision seems severely limited to your own working set. And some of the
> things you say (nothing but greedy RAM policies in any Unix-like OS?
> No reason to use a low-power netbook running Fedora on the train?) are
> just plain wrong.
>
> --
> Joel Rees
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


NetworkManager

2012-05-28 Thread jarmo
What's wrong with networkmanager? From fedora 15 it has not managed
make automatic connection with mobile broadband. Using nokia c-17
dongle and everything worked ok with f14. But not after. I've seen loud
a much bugreportas about it, but no correction. Is anyone from list
noticed same. Mostly in ubuntu list this is reported, but seems, that
correction is somewhere hiding. Anyone know solution?

Jarmo
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: The death of Hibernate?

2012-05-28 Thread Joel Rees
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Reindl Harald  wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.05.2012 07:45, schrieb Joel Rees:
 Do you understand the reason you still set up swap, even though your
 entire workload working set fits into RAM?
>>>
>>> there is no single reason if you have enough RAM
>>
>> In an ideal world, RAM would not consume energy.
>>
>> This is a real world, what energy I have on the train is a small
>> Lithium ion battery.
>
> why in the world do you wake up this thread after weeks again?

The after three weeks part is that I have a day job and a night job,
and trying to keep up with the mailing list is not top priority for
me.

The wake it up part, I guess, is that I really, really think hibernate
is important.

And technical accuracy is also important to me.

You contribute some good things to the list, Riendl, but your field of
vision seems severely limited to your own working set. And some of the
things you say (nothing but greedy RAM policies in any Unix-like OS?
No reason to use a low-power netbook running Fedora on the train?) are
just plain wrong.

--
Joel Rees
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


3G Key

2012-05-28 Thread Patrick Dupre

Hello,

I have a 3G key:

Bus 001 Device 011: ID 12d1:1436 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Couldn't open device, some information will be missing
Device Descriptor:
  bLength18
  bDescriptorType 1
  bcdUSB   2.00
  bDeviceClass  239 Miscellaneous Device
  bDeviceSubClass 2 ?
  bDeviceProtocol 1 Interface Association
  bMaxPacketSize064
  idVendor   0x12d1 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
  idProduct  0x1436
  bcdDevice0.00
  iManufacturer   4
  iProduct3
  iSerial 0
  bNumConfigurations  1
  Configuration Descriptor:


When I plug it on a laptop, it is automatically recognize and I can 
give the

Pin number.
root  5954  0.0  0.0  0 0 ?S12:12   0:00 
[usb-storage]
root  5956  0.0  0.0  0 0 ?S12:12   0:00 
[usb-storage]



When I plug it on another computer, it is also recognize (I can tell
from lsusb) and I never have the option to give the Pin number.
How can I load the interface to give the PIN number?

Thank.


--
==
 Patrick DUPRÉ|   |  email: pdu...@kegtux.org
==
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

2012-05-28 Thread Ed Greshko
On 05/28/2012 04:17 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Maybe this explains why I'm unable to access the serial port... once again 
> SELinux
> more a pain in the ass rather than of real use...
>
> http://www.ukraa.com/www/faq/75-starbar/102-fedora15rxtx.html
>
>
> Fedora 15 Unable to connect to serial port
>
> Written by Administrator Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:16
>
> Fedora 15 fails to connect to USB - Serial port or inbuilt serial port
>
> Fedora 15 comes with a restrictive user policy.
>
> Your user account need to be in the dialout group you can accomplish this 
> with the
> command below run as the root user.
>
> usermod -a -G dialout 
>

Wow  :-) :-) 

And did you know that one needs to be part of the "wireshark" group to use 
wireshark
as a normal user?  And, you have to part of the "vboxusers" group to gain 
access to
USB devices when using VirtualBox?

This has nothing to do with selinux.  It is normal unix/linux limiting policy.


-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: partition question

2012-05-28 Thread Bryn M. Reeves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 05/27/2012 09:04 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 12:45:45 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: I went around that
> tree a few months back, and as far as I could discover there is no
> was to resize a partition. The parted documentation seemed to imply
> that resizing was supported, but at the end, no luck.
> 

It's possible but there are a fair number of steps involved.

Use rescue mode (you'll need to in order to resize the rootfs and
partition containing the PV).

Boot into rescue mode and skip the file system detection option then
use lvresize or lvreduce to shrink the file system volumes and their
file systems (specify the --resizefs flag - otherwise you need to do
this as a two-step process, first shrink the file system with e.g.
resize2fs, then shrink the LV that contains it).

Once you've shrunk the LVs you can check to see if the PV can be
resized - use pvresize with the --setphysicalvolumesize option to set
the the PV to the intended size.

If this step fails it will be because there are still extents
allocated to some LVs that are using the space you want to free up
(this is unlikely with the default Fedora layout but can happen with
more complex VGs or VGs that have a lot of allocations taking place).
If this is the case you'll need to use pvmove to relocate those
extents elsewhere (see the pvmove man page).

Once the PV has been reduced in size you can shrink the partition.
Unfortunately there's no good automatic support for this today. Parted
still insists on resizing file systems (but doesn't work with most
common file systems..).

I normally use fdisk: you'll need to remove (delete) the partition you
want to resize and then re-create it with the same starting offset.
The easiest way to do this is to use sector mode (default now) and
make a note of the value in the start column before removing the original.

If you're using a GPT partition table then you can do the same
remove/re-add routine with parted but I prefer fdisk for MBR partition
tables (again, use sector units when modifying the partition).

Regards,
Bryn.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/DSL8ACgkQ6YSQoMYUY96NJACaAtX4udNORzZiKf71tF/36zCB
QbsAnRcGwTKEhBC99oRcWrt32GDjTBjZ
=mC1T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

2012-05-28 Thread Zoltan Boszormenyi

2012-05-28 10:17 keltezéssel, Fernando Cassia írta:



On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Alan Cox > wrote:


There is a procedure for identifying some serial devices via magic PnP
sequences and it ought to be able to identify some modems that way. You
can't however randomly assume.


Maybe this explains why I'm unable to access the serial port... once again SELinux more 
a pain in the ass rather than of real use...


http://www.ukraa.com/www/faq/75-starbar/102-fedora15rxtx.html


Fedora 15 Unable to connect to serial port

Written by Administrator Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:16

Fedora 15 fails to connect to USB - Serial port or inbuilt serial port

Fedora 15 comes with a restrictive user policy.

Your user account need to be in the dialout group you can accomplish this with the 
command below run as the root user.


usermod -a -G dialout 



What does it have to do with SELinux? It's the plain old UNIX permissions.
In the old(ish) times, you had to be in the "uucp" group to accomplish the same.


-

FC






-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: what name does com1 rs232 get in F16+ ?

2012-05-28 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Alan Cox  wrote:

> There is a procedure for identifying some serial devices via magic PnP
> sequences and it ought to be able to identify some modems that way. You
> can't however randomly assume.
>

Maybe this explains why I'm unable to access the serial port... once again
SELinux more a pain in the ass rather than of real use...

http://www.ukraa.com/www/faq/75-starbar/102-fedora15rxtx.html
 Fedora 15 Unable to connect to serial port

 Written by Administrator  Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:16

Fedora 15 fails to connect to USB - Serial port or inbuilt serial port

Fedora 15 comes with a restrictive user policy.
Your user account need to be in the dialout group you can accomplish this
with the command below run as the root user.

usermod -a -G dialout 

-

FC
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org