How to limit maximum number of TCP connections

2012-06-26 Thread Jatin K

Dear All

I'm on FC 15 which is acting as a router for Cable Internet connection
for 145 PC on the LAN, which works fine... But there is one question in
my mind, How do I limit the maximum numbers of concurrent connections to
router. i.e. if I want to allow only 90 concurrent connection to the
router at the given time only 90 PCs can pass through the router or
connect to the Internet other PCs/users have to wait until the connected
PCs session is over.

is there any solution/tweak available ???

--
  °v°
 /(_)\
  ^ ^  Jatin Khatri
RHCSA,RHCE,CCNA
Registerd Linux user No #501175
www.linuxcounter.net
No M$

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Not receiving my own posts

2012-06-26 Thread n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
I changed m account settings to receive them, and it is not working
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Catalyst 12.6 drivers

2012-06-26 Thread n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
These are now available on RPMFusion non free testing repository. It
installed with no problems for me.

This should remove the watermark, (I've not tested it)

#!/bin/sh
DRIVER=/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/fglrx_drv.so
for x in $(objdump -d $DRIVER|awk '/call/&&/EnableLogo/{print
"\\x"$2"\\x"$3"\\x"$4"\\x"$5"\\x"$6}'); do
sed -i "s/$x/\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90/g" $DRIVER
done

Regards

cpp4ever
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

2012-06-26 Thread Robert Arkiletian
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, David A. De Graaf  wrote:
> Does anyone know how to allow root and users other than me to use the
> sound system?
>
> Ever since pulseaudio was introduced in Fedora 8 and Mr. Lennart
> Poettering inflicted his peculiar ideas of security on us, the default
> installation hasn't worked properly, despite many BZ's and copious
> complaints!  Specifically, pulseaudio invents the "seat" and only the
> one person in the "seat" can use the sound system.  This precludes
> having root, or anyone else, from generating sounds - presumably it's a
> security risk.  Bosh!

Yup. Ran into this problem trying to make an alarm clock with atd or
crond. Can't have sound unless you are logged in. I had to totally
remove PA and just use alsa. But I know that's not possible any more.
Now we have systemd too. Joy.

-- 
Robert Arkiletian
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Removing unwanted extensions from Thunderbird

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/27/2012 09:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Now, you've indicated you know how you installed the other 2?

I had asked that question since if the OP knew how he installed it, it may 
provide a
clue as to how to remove it since the "remove" button isn't there.

However, the OP has responded to me privately telling me he didn't really like 
being
asked that... Indicating that this type of question is "OUT OF BOUNDS!!!".

I can not see any reason why I should continue to lend assistance in this
matter...and most likely any others.

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Richard Vickery
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:37 -0400, Jim wrote:
> > Fedora 17 new install on a USB connected hard drive.
> >
> > I have Dell Dimension 2400 with WindowsXP installed, But !! I can't
> > get this Dell to Boot off a CDROM.
> > by even setting up BIOS to boot off CDROM.
> >
> > Yes the CD is a Bootable CD.  If you read the CD from within WindowsXP
> > it will read the the files on the CD.
> >
> > I was thinking about taking hard drive out the Dell and USB connect
> > the hard drive to another Computer and do a resize of WindowsXP and
> > install Fedora on hard drive and setting up the hard drive as a Boot
> > drive , then put it back into the Dell 2400.
> >
> > The Dell hard drive is a IDE drive and My computer is SATA so I can't
> > put the Dell hard drive in my PC.
> >
> > Will it Work 
>
> Don't you mean a DVD?
>
> If the the procedure I outlined in my previous note does not work Down
> load a Live CD. Install it on a usb stick using unetbootin you get from
> unetbootin.sourceforge.net
>
> Then use the usb stick to install Fedora 17.
>
> --
> ===
> The truth is what is; what should be is a dirty lie. -- Lenny Bruce
> ===
> Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>

I have a Dell that came with Linux pre-installed.They don't offer phone
support, but they offer very good web support
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 06/26/2012 12:37 PM, Jim wrote:
> Fedora 17 new install on a USB connected hard drive.
>
> I have Dell Dimension 2400 with WindowsXP installed, But !! I can't
get this Dell to Boot off a CDROM.
> by even setting up BIOS to boot off CDROM.
>
> Yes the CD is a Bootable CD. If you read the CD from within
WindowsXP it will read the the files on the CD.
>
> I was thinking about taking hard drive out the Dell and USB connect
the hard drive to another Computer and do a resize of WindowsXP and
install Fedora on hard drive and setting up the hard drive as a Boot
drive , then put it back into the Dell 2400.
>
> The Dell hard drive is a IDE drive and My computer is SATA so I
can't put the Dell hard drive in my PC.
>
> Will it Work 
>
>
You will probably run into problems with the wrong drivers being
loaded into the initrd image. It may not have the IDE drivers.

Are you sure your system does not have an IDE connection as well as
the SATA connections? A lot of motherboards have both.

In any case, you will have to select a custom GRUB config because
the drive configuration will be different when you are installing
and when you boot with the drive back in the Dell.

Mikkel
- -- 
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and
taste good with Ketchup!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/qYs8ACgkQqbQrVW3JyMS8LgCffA6sxz9LG/E0uHekS8iv1Wzb
bsYAnj6RlihnE1XMHfWT9g5924KgMpdZ
=iLfn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Pulseaudio strikes again!

2012-06-26 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 06/26/2012 02:22 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> Does anyone know how to allow root and users other than me to use the
> sound system?
>
> Ever since pulseaudio was introduced in Fedora 8 and Mr. Lennart
> Poettering inflicted his peculiar ideas of security on us, the default
> installation hasn't worked properly, despite many BZ's and copious
> complaints! Specifically, pulseaudio invents the "seat" and only the
> one person in the "seat" can use the sound system. This precludes
> having root, or anyone else, from generating sounds - presumably it's a
> security risk. Bosh!
Well, that depends on if you have a microphone attached to your
system, and consider allowing a remote user to listen to what is
going on by your computer a security risk.
>
> A simple workaround was found - remove the alsa-plugins-pulseaudio
> package, and edit /etc/group, adding everyone on the system to the
> audio group (what a nutty idea). That removed the restrictions and
> restored sanity. Root could even generate a login tune via the
> /etc/rc.d/rc.local script, before anyone had logged on.
>
> With F17, this escape hatch has been removed.
> With the alsa-plugins-pulseaudio package absent, a simple command to
> play a sound yields a core dump:
>
> $ play /usr/share/sounds/KDE-Sys-Log-In.ogg
> dsp_protocol_open_node(): Could not open pcm device file
/dev/dsptask/pcm2
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> The pcm device file is, indeed, absent from the file system.
> In fact, no sounds whatever can be generated by any of the standard
> methods I use. (Except that Windows running inside VirtualBox seems
> able to manage it.)
It sounds like the snd_pcm module did not get loaded.
>
> To get any sound at all, I've had to reinstall the
> alsa-plugins-pulseaudio package, but this allows only me to generate
> sound and destroys my crontab-simulated grandfather clock, among other
> things.
>
> On an i386 netbook, F17 sound works fine, as it always has, with the
> alsa-plugins-pulseaudio package removed. The play program doesn't
> complain about the absence of /dev/dsptask/pcm2, but just plays the
> sound.
>
> What new magic incantation is now required that I may be permitted
> to use my x86_64 sound system fully?
>
You may want to look into running PA as a system daemon instead of a
user daemon.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk/qYLQACgkQqbQrVW3JyMRCYgCeLds+GSpPpofeVzSwt6mYk94K
t4gAmwYTb1G+5Y3OgSoqA86SVGB/RJNU
=GAup
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Removing unwanted extensions from Thunderbird

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/27/2012 09:02 AM, JD wrote:
> I do not recall installing 2 of them,
> namely
> Estonian ID Card
> laajennus Voikon kaytoon
>
> I have seen firefox install add-ons and extentions upon startup
> that I have not requested.
> I wonder if TB does the same? 

There are 2 places where extensions live.

~/.thunderbird/something.default/extensions
and
/usr/lib/mozilla/extensions

Those that live in /usr/lib/mozilla/extensions have been installed "globally" 
and
therefore will not present a "remove" option.

In the case of "Estonian ID Card" you have probably installed the mozilla-esteid
package when you went ahead and installed **everything**.  So, you see what 
headaches
you've made for yourself?  You've installed **everything** and now you are 
seeing
things you want to get rid of and you've no idea what they are and how to get 
rid of
them.

FWIW, the only extension that gets installed in the $user area on first run is
"Thunderbird Test Pilot".  You are given the option to remove since this is in 
the
user's directory.

Now, you've indicated you know how you installed the other 2?

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Removing unwanted extensions from Thunderbird

2012-06-26 Thread JD

On 06/26/2012 06:44 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/27/2012 08:17 AM, JD wrote:
I have disabled 3 extensions from TB. However. after restarting TB, I 
was hoping that now I would be provided with a Remove button for each 
of these extentions. Only the Enable button shows up. So are 
thsese extensions built-in and cannot be removed? The extensions are: 
Estonian ID Card FireTray laajennus Voikon kaytoon provider for 
google calendar 
You said 3, and you listed 4. They are not built in. How did you 
install them? 

Not a good typist - 3 is too close to 4 :)
I do not recall installing 2 of them,
namely
Estonian ID Card
laajennus Voikon kaytoon

I have seen firefox install add-ons and extentions upon startup
that I have not requested.
I wonder if TB does the same?

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Removing unwanted extensions from Thunderbird

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/27/2012 08:17 AM, JD wrote:
> I have disabled 3 extensions from TB.
> However. after restarting TB, I was hoping
> that now I would be provided with a Remove
> button for each of these extentions. Only
> the Enable button shows up.
> So are thsese extensions built-in and
> cannot be removed?
> The extensions are:
> Estonian ID Card
> FireTray
> laajennus Voikon kaytoon
> provider for google calendar 

You said 3, and you listed 4.

They are not built in.  How did you install them?

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Removing unwanted extensions from Thunderbird

2012-06-26 Thread JD

I have disabled 3 extensions from TB.
However. after restarting TB, I was hoping
that now I would be provided with a Remove
button for each of these extentions. Only
the Enable button shows up.
So are thsese extensions built-in and
cannot be removed?
The extensions are:
Estonian ID Card
FireTray
laajennus Voikon kaytoon
provider for google calendar

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F16 wireshark install

2012-06-26 Thread Bill Davidsen

Mark Haney wrote:

On 06/26/2012 12:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:



But, make sure you install wireshark and wireshark-gnome  and make sure
you add
yourself to the wireshark group.



That's very interesting.  When I did the initial install (using sudo yum install
wireshark) this is what yum told me:


=

 Package Arch
VersionRepository Size
=

Installing:
 wireshark   x86_64
1.6.6-1.fc16   updates10 M
Installing for dependencies:
 libsmi  x86_64
0.4.8-6.fc15   fedora2.3 M

Transaction Summary
=

Install  1 Package (+1 Dependent package)


Apparently that doesn't install the binary for wireshark as I didn't get that
until I installed wireshark-gnome.  Shoudn't this be a dependency of wireshark?
I am not sure I understand why wireshark-gnome is NOT a dependency of wireshark.

Wireshark works fine without the GUI, but in a very limited fashion. The gnome 
wrapper just lets you use it in a convenient manner.


Ed: I found that there is now a wireshark group, the first time I tried to use 
it on fc17, Anyone have a good idea *why?* It's not that the unprivileged user 
can just grab packets off an interface or anything, and while I don't see the 
average user having a use for it, I've been wrong about that before, with 
legitimate useful stuff being done by people I would not have suspected would 
understand the capability, much less make use of it.


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Ken Smith

Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/26/2012 09:54 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
   

{snip} user accessible then
installing a service should enable and start it.
 

{snip}

Well, IMO, server software should default to disabled.  It is not unusual for 
users
(novices and even experienced) to install server side software they aren't 
going to
use...at least initially.  To have them default to start seems a good choice.  
This
is especially true when you probably should alter any default configurations.


   

{snip}
I could argue this both ways. For something like xrdp I think it should 
install, enable and run. I can see an argument for other daemons that 
need more application specific config that install and default to 
disabled might be a good initial position.

{snip}



I've not used XDMCP in years.  I think part of the reason I moved away from it 
is
that when I do "remote" it can be *remote* and the performance over low 
bandwidth or
high latency links was lacking.

   

Agree, but over a 1G LAN with modern hardware it should just fly along.

:-) Ken

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Ken Smith

Alan Cox wrote:

{snip} how does removing XDMCP functionality further
Fedora's cause?
 

It's not a Fedora thing, it's a Gnome thing. Fedora ships several other
display managers all of which do xdmcp just fine.

In appreciate that its a Gnome thing

Thanks

Ken


   



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:37 -0400, Jim wrote:
> Fedora 17 new install on a USB connected hard drive.
> 
> I have Dell Dimension 2400 with WindowsXP installed, But !! I can't
> get this Dell to Boot off a CDROM.
> by even setting up BIOS to boot off CDROM.
> 
> Yes the CD is a Bootable CD.  If you read the CD from within WindowsXP
> it will read the the files on the CD.
> 
> I was thinking about taking hard drive out the Dell and USB connect
> the hard drive to another Computer and do a resize of WindowsXP and
> install Fedora on hard drive and setting up the hard drive as a Boot
> drive , then put it back into the Dell 2400.
> 
> The Dell hard drive is a IDE drive and My computer is SATA so I can't
> put the Dell hard drive in my PC.
> 
> Will it Work 

Don't you mean a DVD?

If the the procedure I outlined in my previous note does not work Down
load a Live CD. Install it on a usb stick using unetbootin you get from
unetbootin.sourceforge.net

Then use the usb stick to install Fedora 17.

--
===
The truth is what is; what should be is a dirty lie. -- Lenny Bruce
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:37 -0400, Jim wrote:
> Fedora 17 new install on a USB connected hard drive.
> 
> I have Dell Dimension 2400 with WindowsXP installed, But !! I can't
> get this Dell to Boot off a CDROM.
> by even setting up BIOS to boot off CDROM.
> 
> Yes the CD is a Bootable CD.  If you read the CD from within WindowsXP
> it will read the the files on the CD.
> 
> I was thinking about taking hard drive out the Dell and USB connect
> the hard drive to another Computer and do a resize of WindowsXP and
> install Fedora on hard drive and setting up the hard drive as a Boot
> drive , then put it back into the Dell 2400.
> 
> The Dell hard drive is a IDE drive and My computer is SATA so I can't
> put the Dell hard drive in my PC.
> 
> Will it Work 

Well there are several things.
1. The F17 DVD only boots on selected machines. Of my machines it boots
on only w2 of the three.
2. Howerver I found it will boot if you perform the following procedure.
Go into the Bios and then into the Boot Sequence option. You don't have
to do anything except exit the Boot sequence and exit  the bios. Exit
and save if it asks you that. The the DVD will boot to the Install oe
Update screen. Chose that and the booting will continue after producing
the following mysterious erroo messgae:

Error could not insert 'floppy' no such device
Loading   Fedora 17 i686 install
rpcbind terminating on  signal. Restart with "rpcbind -w"


Just let the error message sit there until it goes in to the language
choice menu. 

All my problems have been on Dell machines.

-- 
--
===
The Angels want to wear my red shoes. -- E. Costello
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Robert Myers
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Ken Smith  wrote:

> Hi, I in danger of making this a rant, but is XDMCP no longer something
> that Fedora supports?
>
> gives?
>



>
> Thanks for any hints and guidance.
>

I have more than a hint and guidance.  I have emphatic advice.  Stop trying
to import and export desktops, no matter the system.  Import and export
windows or create virtual machines, but do not ever under any circumstances
attempt to deal with virtual desktops, no matter the Windows or Linux
distribution.  If you get it right once for some circumstance, whatever you
have gotten right will soon become wrong in some intolerable way just as
soon as some weenie somewhere has a better idea.  No one is more or less a
sinner.  All are.  I know what a virtual machine is and I know what a
window is and so do most systems.  No one seems to be able to agree on what
a desktop is or what its powers are, and that problem is absolutely
fundamental.

Robert Myers
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F16 wireshark install

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/27/2012 12:51 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> Apparently that doesn't install the binary for wireshark as I didn't get that 
> until
> I installed wireshark-gnome.  Shoudn't this be a dependency of wireshark?  I 
> am not
> sure I understand why wireshark-gnome is NOT a dependency of wireshark. 

Well..*maybe* it makes a "bit" more sense if one does a yum info on both

Name: wireshark
Arch: i686
Version : 1.6.6
Release : 1.fc16
Size: 46 M
Repo: installed
From repo   : updates
Summary : Network traffic analyzer
URL : http://www.wireshark.org/
License : GPL+
Description : Wireshark is a network traffic analyzer for Unix-ish operating
: systems.
:
: This package lays base for libpcap, a packet capture and filtering
: library, contains command-line utilities, contains plugins and
: documentation for wireshark. A graphical user interface is 
packaged
: separately to GTK+ package.


Name: wireshark-gnome
Arch: i686
Version : 1.6.6
Release : 1.fc16
Size: 2.2 M
Repo: installed
From repo   : updates
Summary : Gnome desktop integration for wireshark
URL : http://www.wireshark.org/
License : GPL+
Description : Contains wireshark for Gnome 2 and desktop integration file



-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 15:09:20 -0400,
  Jim  wrote:
this booting off CDrom is a Major problem for this Dell 2400, it's 
all over the internet, but no has came up with a fix on the problem.


I'm guessing there isn't a BIOS (or possible other firmware) for your computer?
If there was something like this might be fixed in such an update.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Pulseaudio strikes again!

2012-06-26 Thread David A. De Graaf
Does anyone know how to allow root and users other than me to use the
sound system?

Ever since pulseaudio was introduced in Fedora 8 and Mr. Lennart
Poettering inflicted his peculiar ideas of security on us, the default
installation hasn't worked properly, despite many BZ's and copious
complaints!  Specifically, pulseaudio invents the "seat" and only the
one person in the "seat" can use the sound system.  This precludes
having root, or anyone else, from generating sounds - presumably it's a
security risk.  Bosh!

A simple workaround was found - remove the alsa-plugins-pulseaudio
package, and edit /etc/group, adding everyone on the system to the
audio group (what a nutty idea).  That removed the restrictions and
restored sanity.  Root could even generate a login tune via the
/etc/rc.d/rc.local script, before anyone had logged on.

With F17, this escape hatch has been removed. 
With the alsa-plugins-pulseaudio package absent, a simple command to
play a sound yields a core dump:

  $ play /usr/share/sounds/KDE-Sys-Log-In.ogg
  dsp_protocol_open_node(): Could not open pcm device file /dev/dsptask/pcm2
  Segmentation fault (core dumped)

The pcm device file is, indeed, absent from the file system.
In fact, no sounds whatever can be generated by any of the standard
methods I use.  (Except that Windows running inside VirtualBox seems
able to manage it.)

To get any sound at all, I've had to reinstall the
alsa-plugins-pulseaudio package, but this allows only me to generate
sound and destroys my crontab-simulated grandfather clock, among other
things.

On an i386 netbook, F17 sound works fine, as it always has, with the
alsa-plugins-pulseaudio package removed.  The play program doesn't
complain about the absence of /dev/dsptask/pcm2, but just plays the
sound.

What new magic incantation is now required that I may be permitted
to use my x86_64 sound system fully?

-- 
David A. De GraafDATIX, Inc.Hendersonville, NC
d...@datix.us www.datix.us
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Jim

On 06/26/2012 02:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 06/26/2012 11:29 AM, Jim wrote:

Yes the CD will boot off another computer.



OK, that's one possibility eliminated.  Always good to make sure.


  And Dell isn't going to be much help with a old computer and me
installing Linux, they will only give advice on Windows, and the CHARGE
you for it.


I'm not familiar with Dell, and had no idea how old the computer is. 
Are there any help forums or mailing lists for Dell you can ask on? 
(Not that I'm trying to shove you off, but you may need specialized 
assistance.)  I do know, as an example, that there's a mailing list 
for people running Linux on Toshiba laptops, because I'm on it.
this booting off CDrom is a Major problem for this Dell 2400, it's all 
over the internet, but no has came up with a fix on the problem.


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 17 boot problem

2012-06-26 Thread Mark Haney

On 06/26/2012 01:52 PM, Arkadiusz Kotarba wrote:

Hi.
After installation everything I see is the top edge of the screen, rest
is just black. No matter if I install from livecd/dvd or try upgrading
from Fedora 16 through dvd installer. Same if I try to boot with 3
instead of rhgb and quiet options (runlevel 3 if I remember correctly).
Fedora 16 was running fine, without any problems.

Hardware: Phenom II X6 1090T, AMD HD 6870, 8GB RAM, HDD WD 1TB

Any ideas?
Thanks in advice.
Athane


I just ordered a Phenom II X6 for my system.  I have F17 up and running 
on it, I can let you know off list if I have any trouble after I put the 
new CPU in.


Personally I don't think that would be the problem, but you never know.


--

Mark Haney
Software Developer/Consultant
AB Emblem
ma...@abemblem.com
Linux marius.homelinux 3.4.2-1.fc16.x86_64 GNU/Linux


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Joe Zeff

On 06/26/2012 11:29 AM, Jim wrote:

Yes the CD will boot off another computer.



OK, that's one possibility eliminated.  Always good to make sure.


  And Dell isn't going to be much help with a old computer and me
installing Linux, they will only give advice on Windows, and the CHARGE
you for it.


I'm not familiar with Dell, and had no idea how old the computer is. 
Are there any help forums or mailing lists for Dell you can ask on? 
(Not that I'm trying to shove you off, but you may need specialized 
assistance.)  I do know, as an example, that there's a mailing list for 
people running Linux on Toshiba laptops, because I'm on it.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Jim

On 06/26/2012 02:23 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 06/26/2012 10:37 AM, Jim wrote:

Yes the CD is a Bootable CD.  If you read the CD from within WindowsXP
it will read the the files on the CD.


Two questions: first, have you tried booting a different computer with 
this CD?  Second, have you discussed this with Dell?


Yes the CD will boot off another computer.

 And Dell isn't going to be much help with a old computer and me 
installing Linux, they will only give advice on Windows, and the CHARGE 
you for it.


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Joe Zeff

On 06/26/2012 10:37 AM, Jim wrote:

Yes the CD is a Bootable CD.  If you read the CD from within WindowsXP
it will read the the files on the CD.


Two questions: first, have you tried booting a different computer with 
this CD?  Second, have you discussed this with Dell?

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Terry Polzin
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 13:37 -0400, Jim wrote:
> Fedora 17 new install on a USB connected hard drive.
> 
> I have Dell Dimension 2400 with WindowsXP installed, But !! I can't
> get this Dell to Boot off a CDROM.
> by even setting up BIOS to boot off CDROM.
> 
> Yes the CD is a Bootable CD.  If you read the CD from within WindowsXP
> it will read the the files on the CD.
> 
> I was thinking about taking hard drive out the Dell and USB connect
> the hard drive to another Computer and do a resize of WindowsXP and
> install Fedora on hard drive and setting up the hard drive as a Boot
> drive , then put it back into the Dell 2400.
> 
> The Dell hard drive is a IDE drive and My computer is SATA so I can't
> put the Dell hard drive in my PC.
> 
> Will it Work 

In addition to resizing your XP partition, you may have to "move" it
over to make enough space for grub.  There's lots of posts all over
about this.
You might first want to test by booting it on your PC via USB and with
that SATA HD disconnected.  If you fail to boot with some weird grub
error then you still have some partition manipulation to do. To do
partition manipulation, I generally use a gparted live CD.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Fedora 17 boot problem

2012-06-26 Thread Arkadiusz Kotarba

Hi.
After installation everything I see is the top edge of the screen, rest 
is just black. No matter if I install from livecd/dvd or try upgrading 
from Fedora 16 through dvd installer. Same if I try to boot with 3 
instead of rhgb and quiet options (runlevel 3 if I remember correctly).

Fedora 16 was running fine, without any problems.

Hardware: Phenom II X6 1090T, AMD HD 6870, 8GB RAM, HDD WD 1TB

Any ideas?
Thanks in advice.
Athane
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Installing Fedora on a USB connected Harddrive.

2012-06-26 Thread Jim

Fedora 17 new install on a USB connected hard drive.

I have Dell Dimension 2400 with WindowsXP installed, But !! I can't get 
this Dell to Boot off a CDROM.

by even setting up BIOS to boot off CDROM.

Yes the CD is a Bootable CD.  If you read the CD from within WindowsXP 
it will read the the files on the CD.


I was thinking about taking hard drive out the Dell and USB connect the 
hard drive to another Computer and do a resize of WindowsXP and install 
Fedora on hard drive and setting up the hard drive as a Boot drive , 
then put it back into the Dell 2400.


The Dell hard drive is a IDE drive and My computer is SATA so I can't 
put the Dell hard drive in my PC.


Will it Work 
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F16 wireshark install

2012-06-26 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:51:19 -0400, Mark Haney wrote:

> Apparently that doesn't install the binary for wireshark as I didn't get 
> that until I installed wireshark-gnome.  Shoudn't this be a dependency 
> of wireshark?  I am not sure I understand why wireshark-gnome is NOT a 
> dependency of wireshark.

wireshark not only contains the backend libraries but also couple of tools
in /usr/sbin that can be used independently and without the GUI.

-- 
Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.3-1.fc17.x86_64
loadavg: 1.29 0.57 0.29
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Gordon Messmer

On 06/25/2012 02:27 PM, Ken Smith wrote:

Oddly, on my remote X server when I run "X -query machinename :1" the
desktop of the remote X server freezes when connecting to this rogue F17
install.


I noticed the same thing when I tried to use F17 as the XDMCP server for 
a CentOS 6 X11 display.  I didn't look into it much, then.  I just ran 
it again, and noticed that it's printing the following to the console. 
It looks like XDMCP isn't disabled, but may be exposing a bug in 
previous versions of the X11 display server.  See if you're getting a 
similar message on the system console.



*** glibc detected *** X: free(): corrupted unsorted chunks: 
0x018fe830 ***

=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x3c9d275296]
X(SrvXkbResizeKeyType+0x4ef)[0x50ecdf]
X[0x508db5]
X[0x509a08]
X[0x4321a1]
X[0x421ebb]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x3c9d21ecdd]
X[0x421a49]
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F16 wireshark install

2012-06-26 Thread Mark Haney

On 06/26/2012 12:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:



But, make sure you install wireshark and wireshark-gnome  and make sure you 
add
yourself to the wireshark group.



That's very interesting.  When I did the initial install (using sudo yum 
install wireshark) this is what yum told me:



=
 Package Arch Version   
 Repository Size
=
Installing:
 wireshark   x86_64   
1.6.6-1.fc16   updates10 M
Installing for dependencies:
 libsmi  x86_64   
0.4.8-6.fc15   fedora2.3 M

Transaction Summary
=
Install  1 Package (+1 Dependent package)


Apparently that doesn't install the binary for wireshark as I didn't get 
that until I installed wireshark-gnome.  Shoudn't this be a dependency 
of wireshark?  I am not sure I understand why wireshark-gnome is NOT a 
dependency of wireshark.




--

Mark Haney
Software Developer/Consultant
AB Emblem
ma...@abemblem.com
Linux marius.homelinux 3.4.2-1.fc16.x86_64 GNU/Linux


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F16 wireshark install

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/27/2012 12:11 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> I just installed wireshark on my F16 laptop.  At least I think I did. The only
> issue is it looks like it installed everything /except/ the binary.  Has 
> anyone
> else seen this?
>

No

But, make sure you install wireshark and wireshark-gnome  and make sure you 
add
yourself to the wireshark group.

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/27/2012 12:14 AM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> I am very sorry but certainly appreciate your help. Now go to bed. I will 
> live if I
> don't get it working. I am up pretty late. 

OK  Well I may turn in nowit is just past midnight.

Let everyone know the results of your testing in detail.  I'm sure others will 
chime
in. z

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Lawrence Graves


On 06/26/2012 10:11 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/27/2012 12:08 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:

This confirms that there is a "server" running on 192.168.0.198

Sorry about all the duplicate lines..  Getting late here in Taiwan and past 
my
bed time  :-)

I am very sorry but certainly appreciate your help. Now go to bed. I 
will live if I don't get it working. I am up pretty late.

--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov.3:5 & 6


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


F16 wireshark install

2012-06-26 Thread Mark Haney
I just installed wireshark on my F16 laptop.  At least I think I did. 
The only issue is it looks like it installed everything /except/ the 
binary.  Has anyone else seen this?


--

Mark Haney
Software Developer/Consultant
AB Emblem
ma...@abemblem.com
Linux marius.homelinux 3.4.2-1.fc16.x86_64 GNU/Linux

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/27/2012 12:08 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> This confirms that there is a "server" running on 192.168.0.198

Sorry about all the duplicate lines..  Getting late here in Taiwan and past 
my
bed time  :-)

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2012 11:59 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> I am still not able to connect. 

Can you be a bit more specific?

OKlet me tell you my setup.

I have a server that I want to connect with using Remmina.

The IP address of the server side is 192.168.0.198
The IP address of the client side is 192.168.0.18

On the server side, also known as F17

[root@f17 egreshko]# systemctl enable xrdp.service
ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/xrdp.service'
'/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/xrdp.service'
[root@f17 egreshko]# systemctl enable xrdp-sesman.service
ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/xrdp-sesman.service'
'/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/xrdp-sesman.service'
[root@f17 egreshko]# systemctl start xrdp.service
[root@f17 egreshko]# systemctl start xrdp-sesman.service
[root@f17 egreshko]# ps -eaf | grep xrdp
root  3510 1  0 00:04 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/xrdp-sesman --nodaemon
root  3511 1  0 00:04 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/xrdp --nodaemon
root  3516  2950  0 00:05 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto xrdp

Then

On the client side, also known as meimei
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ telnet 192.168.0.198 3389
Trying 192.168.0.198...
Connected to 192.168.0.198.
Escape character is '^]'.

192.168.0.198192.168.0.198
This confirms that there is a "server" running on On the client side, also 
known as
meimei
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ telnet 192.168.0.198 3389
Trying 192.168.0.198...
Connected to 192.168.0.198.
Escape character is '^]'.

192.168.0.198192.168.0.198
This confirms that there is a "server" running on On the client side, also 
known as
meimei
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ telnet 192.168.0.198 3389
Trying 192.168.0.198...
Connected to 192.168.0.198.
Escape character is '^]'.


This confirms that there is a "server" running on 192.168.0.198

Socan you do something like I've shown and give information your IP 
addresses and
processes running?


-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Lawrence Graves


On 06/26/2012 09:48 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/26/2012 11:41 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:

This is where I get confused. I don't understand or know how to get to where the
client side is located.

The "client" side is the "remote" side.  In other wordsit is the side where 
you
are running Remmina.  Remmina is "client" software.  It needs to talk to the
"server"which is, in the case we are discussing, xrdp.

Does that make a bit more sense?


I am still not able to connect.
--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov.3:5 & 6


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2012 11:41 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> This is where I get confused. I don't understand or know how to get to where 
> the
> client side is located. 

The "client" side is the "remote" side.  In other wordsit is the side where 
you
are running Remmina.  Remmina is "client" software.  It needs to talk to the
"server"which is, in the case we are discussing, xrdp.

Does that make a bit more sense?

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Lawrence Graves


On 06/26/2012 09:09 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/26/2012 10:59 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:

I tried all that was given and I still am not able to connect. I tried Remmina 
and
Gnome-rdp. Unless I am putting the information in the wrong areas, this is
confusing. I believe I have all information needed to insert would someone take 
me
step by step in the inserting of this information.

Quick question.

On the server side, did you do the following?

1.  yum install xrdp
2.  systemctl enable xrdp.service
3.  systemctl enable xrdp-sesman.service
4.  systemctl start xrdp.service
5.  systemctl start xrdp-sesman.service

And then on the client side

1.  telnet clientIP 3389

to make sure all is running on the server side and there is no firewall issue?

This is where I get confused. I don't understand or know how to get to where 
the client side is located.


--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov.3:5 & 6


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2012 11:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> And then on the client side
>
> 1.  telnet clientIP 3389

Duh

Of course I meant

1.   telnet serverIP 3389

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2012 10:59 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> I tried all that was given and I still am not able to connect. I tried 
> Remmina and
> Gnome-rdp. Unless I am putting the information in the wrong areas, this is
> confusing. I believe I have all information needed to insert would someone 
> take me
> step by step in the inserting of this information. 

Quick question.

On the server side, did you do the following?

1.  yum install xrdp
2.  systemctl enable xrdp.service
3.  systemctl enable xrdp-sesman.service
4.  systemctl start xrdp.service
5.  systemctl start xrdp-sesman.service

And then on the client side

1.  telnet clientIP 3389

to make sure all is running on the server side and there is no firewall issue?


-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Lawrence Graves


On 06/26/2012 07:42 AM, Lawrence Graves wrote:


On 06/26/2012 07:39 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:

nslookup [hostname]

Password:
[root@Jehovah ~]# nslookup [hostname]
Server:192.168.1.1
Address:192.168.1.1#53

** server can't find [hostname]: NXDOMAIN

This is what came back.
I tried all that was given and I still am not able to connect. I tried 
Remmina and Gnome-rdp. Unless I am putting the information in the wrong 
areas, this is confusing. I believe I have all information needed to 
insert would someone take me step by step in the inserting of this 
information.

--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov.3:5 & 6


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [389-users] Schema changes from 389 1.2.5

2012-06-26 Thread Rich Megginson

On 06/26/2012 05:55 AM, Moisés Barba Pérez wrote:

Hi,

I would like to upgrade 389 from 1.2.5 to the last version before the 
changes in the schema. I mean, In some version of 389 the syntax of 
some attributes had change and I can't upgrade to that version yet, 
but I don't know which is that version to upgrade to the previous one. 
Could you help me?


There have been many syntax, schema, and matching rule changes over the 
years.  Are you trying to figure out in which version 389 started 
checking for syntax validation by default?


In general you can go to 
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git?p=389/ds.git;a=heads and look at the 
tree for each branch.


For example:
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=389/ds.git;a=blob;f=ldap/ldif/template-dse.ldif.in;h=ca2ede8a90b91c69f402f0df790310e7dcabf2aa;hb=389-ds-base-1.2.6

These are the default settings for a 1.2.6 branch server.  It has
27 
 
nsslapd-syntaxcheck: on


The schema is in the directory ldap/schema



Regards,
Moses.


--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/25/2012 09:25 AM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> I made some adjustments with the firewall and I am still receiving the 
> message/
> ERROR: gettaddrinfo: name or server unknown 

Why not just use the IP addresses until you get things running?

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2012 09:54 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> Installing xrdp installed the package but it arrived disabled in systemd - 
> grrr: a
> tad user aggressive - if the aim is to make Fedora more user accessible then
> installing a service should enable and start it. It fails to show up in the
> "Service Configuration" applet until I used bash to tell systemd that its 
> enabled.
> I don't see how to use the Enable and Disable function in "Service 
> Configuration"
> because a service needs to be enabled before it shows up. Gnome 3 runs in 
> fall-back
> mode in xrdp - a good reason to use X.

Well, IMO, server software should default to disabled.  It is not unusual for 
users
(novices and even experienced) to install server side software they aren't 
going to
use...at least initially.  To have them default to start seems a good choice.  
This
is especially true when you probably should alter any default configurations.

I personally don't find it difficult to enter "systemctl enable some.service" 
and
"systemctl start some.service".  I am sure there will be a GUI some day.

As for GNOME in fallback mode.  I don't use GNOMEbut my impression is that 
it
needs certain functionality in the graphics that I'm not sure will work in any 
remote
environment.
 
>
> Vnc does not look too bad in this instance, although in an MS environment I 
> find
> that the image quality often lacking.

I've only found that to be true when using the defaults. 
>
> I have been used to using XDMCP with *nix systems for years it seems a pity to
> remove the function that could/might be kept. I could ask the question the 
> other
> way, how does removing XDMCP functionality further Fedora's cause? 

I've not used XDMCP in years.  I think part of the reason I moved away from it 
is
that when I do "remote" it can be *remote* and the performance over low 
bandwidth or
high latency links was lacking.


-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread poma
On 06/26/2012 12:35 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 05:27 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>> I have just installed F17 x64 in a VM to tinker with it and systemd and I'd 
>> like to
>> enable XDMCP. Or what is the favoured remote access method these days. 
> 
> What are your requirements for remote access?
> 
> Is there something missing from using VNC or xrdp?
> 
Or,
there are something - not missing at all - excess pixels!

regards,
poma
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Alan Cox
> I have been used to using XDMCP with *nix systems for years it seems a 
> pity to remove the function that could/might be kept. I could ask the 
> question the other way, how does removing XDMCP functionality further 
> Fedora's cause?

It's not a Fedora thing, it's a Gnome thing. Fedora ships several other
display managers all of which do xdmcp just fine. The Gnome one is
primarily a docs/config problem. It does it, but the configuration is
undocumented almost every document on Gnome about gdm is stale, obsolete
or misleading.

The setup I run inside firewall is novnc + websockets proxy + Xvnc. I did
play with x11vnc but its basically impossible to make it do what I needed
even if you fiddle with all the config options.

The end result though is that pointing a vaguely modern web browser at the
box gives you a VNC session in browser.

Alan
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Kevin Martin
On 06/26/2012 08:42 AM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> 
> On 06/26/2012 07:39 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
>> nslookup [hostname]
> Password:
> [root@Jehovah ~]# nslookup [hostname]
> Server:192.168.1.1
> Address:192.168.1.1#53
> 
> ** server can't find [hostname]: NXDOMAIN
> 
> This is what came back.

Lawrence,

 He meant do, for example, 'nslookup server1', where 'server1' is the name of 
the server you are using to try to connect the rdp
session to.

Kevin

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Ken Smith


Ed Greshko wrote:

On 06/26/2012 05:27 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
   

I have just installed F17 x64 in a VM to tinker with it and systemd and I'd 
like to
enable XDMCP. Or what is the favoured remote access method these days.
 

What are your requirements for remote access?

Is there something missing from using VNC or xrdp?
   



To Alan:

I see what you mean about  /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/00-upstream-settings. Its 
a comment free zone! I'll dig a little deeper. I have made XDMCP work on 
recent incarnations of Fedora up to 14


To Ed:




I've tried xrdp out.

Installing xrdp installed the package but it arrived disabled in systemd 
- grrr: a tad user aggressive - if the aim is to make Fedora more user 
accessible then installing a service should enable and start it. It 
fails to show up in the "Service Configuration" applet until I used bash 
to tell systemd that its enabled. I don't see how to use the Enable and 
Disable function in "Service Configuration" because a service needs to 
be enabled before it shows up. Gnome 3 runs in fall-back mode in xrdp - 
a good reason to use X.


Vnc does not look too bad in this instance, although in an MS 
environment I find that the image quality often lacking.


I have been used to using XDMCP with *nix systems for years it seems a 
pity to remove the function that could/might be kept. I could ask the 
question the other way, how does removing XDMCP functionality further 
Fedora's cause?


This could get into a discussion about the target audience for 
Fedora/Gnome and what Fedora is trying to achieve. A topic for another 
thread me thinks. I know one of Fedoras' aims is a technology test bed. 
The advice is not to use it for production and here is a good example of 
why.


Thanks

Ken






--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Lawrence Graves


On 06/26/2012 07:39 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:

nslookup [hostname]

Password:
[root@Jehovah ~]# nslookup [hostname]
Server:192.168.1.1
Address:192.168.1.1#53

** server can't find [hostname]: NXDOMAIN

This is what came back.
--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov.3:5 & 6


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Gnome-rdp

2012-06-26 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 07:25:26PM -0600, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> I made some adjustments with the firewall and I am still receiving
> the message/ ERROR: gettaddrinfo: name or server unknown

What do you see when you type:

nslookup [hostname]

with the hostname for the machine you're trying to access via RDP?

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/



pgpGU9DPRvVTs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


No password prompt from GUI login screen

2012-06-26 Thread John Cockerham
Hello,
I have a laptop with Fedora 16-x86_64bit installed.  One day last week I
noticed that I was not required to enter a password to log in from the
graphical screen. For example, when I click on my username from the GUI the
system logs me in immediately without requiring or prompting me to enter my
password.   This is true with all users and when using both Gnome and KDE
desktops.  I have searched everywhere I can think of and can't seem to find
a post describing this issue.  I have verified that auto-login has not been
configured in either Gnome or KDE.  I have also made sure the "Enable
Password-less Logins" is not enabled in the System
Settings/Logins/Convenience tab.  Strangely enough, if the screen saver
kicks in I have to enter a password to unlock it and if I switch to a
textual session (Ctrl+Alt-F3 for example) I have to enter both username and
password to login.

Does anyone have an idea how to re-enable the need to provide a password
from the GUI or where I should begin to look for the problem?

 tks
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2012 05:27 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
> I have just installed F17 x64 in a VM to tinker with it and systemd and I'd 
> like to
> enable XDMCP. Or what is the favoured remote access method these days. 

What are your requirements for remote access?

Is there something missing from using VNC or xrdp?

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: F17 XDMCP

2012-06-26 Thread Alan Cox
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:27:34 +0100
Ken Smith  wrote:

> Hi, I in danger of making this a rant, but is XDMCP no longer something 
> that Fedora supports?

It's not properly been supported in Fedora for years but it does work
most releases.

See

/etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/00-upstream-settings

then go read all about the totally obfuscated dconf mess that Gnome uses.

That should be enough to get you going (I found you also had to restart
gdm)



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 17 - MPEG-4 support and WinFF package

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2012 06:18 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> Thanks, I have rpmfusion configured and I've already used it to install
> some of devil patented packages. But I don't think that there is a
> patent issue with WinFF and I can't find the package for it.

There isn't a WinFF package in the fedora or rpmfusion repositories.  If you 
want to
use that, just download it from their site and "yum localinstall 
winff-1.4.0-3.i386.rpm"

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 17 - MPEG-4 support and WinFF package

2012-06-26 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 26.06.2012 12:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/26/2012 05:55 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> I have a problem with assembling working environment with all packages
>> required to encode/decode/convert MPEG-4 and H.264 media files in Fedora
>> 17 x86_64.
>>
>> I'd like to convert some video files to mpeg-4 format easily but I'm
>> unable to do it. I'm unable to find any comprehensive info about
>> packages that need to be installed in Fedora 17 in order to work with
>> aforementioned files. So I ended up mixing some advice form several
>> blogs etc. I can watch mp4 videos but not create them from other media
>> files.
> You've not indicated if you any 3rd party repos defined.  I suspect not
>
> If you don't have 3rd party repos, that explains the "problem".  The standard 
> Fedora
> repos don't contain software that is patent encumbered.like mpeg and mp3.
>
> You should visit http://rpmfusion.org/ and configure the free and non-free 
> repos.
>
> I am sure others can point you to the software to do what you ask.  I happen 
> to be on
> f16 and use HandBrake for all my conversion needed.  But, there are plenty of 
> others.
>

Thanks, I have rpmfusion configured and I've already used it to install
some of devil patented packages. But I don't think that there is a
patent issue with WinFF and I can't find the package for it.


Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 17 - MPEG-4 support and WinFF package

2012-06-26 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/26/2012 05:55 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> I have a problem with assembling working environment with all packages
> required to encode/decode/convert MPEG-4 and H.264 media files in Fedora
> 17 x86_64.
>
> I'd like to convert some video files to mpeg-4 format easily but I'm
> unable to do it. I'm unable to find any comprehensive info about
> packages that need to be installed in Fedora 17 in order to work with
> aforementioned files. So I ended up mixing some advice form several
> blogs etc. I can watch mp4 videos but not create them from other media
> files.

You've not indicated if you any 3rd party repos defined.  I suspect not

If you don't have 3rd party repos, that explains the "problem".  The standard 
Fedora
repos don't contain software that is patent encumbered.like mpeg and mp3.

You should visit http://rpmfusion.org/ and configure the free and non-free 
repos.

I am sure others can point you to the software to do what you ask.  I happen to 
be on
f16 and use HandBrake for all my conversion needed.  But, there are plenty of 
others.

-- 
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on 
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Fedora 17 - MPEG-4 support and WinFF package

2012-06-26 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
I have a problem with assembling working environment with all packages
required to encode/decode/convert MPEG-4 and H.264 media files in Fedora
17 x86_64.

I'd like to convert some video files to mpeg-4 format easily but I'm
unable to do it. I'm unable to find any comprehensive info about
packages that need to be installed in Fedora 17 in order to work with
aforementioned files. So I ended up mixing some advice form several
blogs etc. I can watch mp4 videos but not create them from other media
files.


My questions are:

1) What packages are to be installed to fully support MPGE-4 as
destination media format?

2) Is there a package with WinFF, the GUI form ffmpeg
(http://winff.org/html_new/) in Fedora 17? Yumming doesn't seem to
provide and faint trail of such a packaged.

3) How can I find extensive info about Fedora packages where I can read
detail about them and search for appropriate one by myself (something
like http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages because
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ doesn't work for me, I hardly can
find anything useful there.)



Thanks in advance for any help,
Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: ping problem

2012-06-26 Thread Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I


On 06/25/2012 03:07 AM, JD wrote:

On 06/25/2012 12:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:

getcap /bin/ping

$ getcap /bin/ping
$

But how could this happen??

That was going to be my question as well! How could something like this 
change?...Unless somehow with an upgrade or update these files are 
re-configured? Just curious.



EGO II

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org