Re: [389-users] dir 389 console on Centos 7
On 12/17/2014 11:51 AM, Crocker, Deborah wrote: It is possible to get the admin console and admin server from an rpm on Centos 7? I don't see them in the yum search output. No, not yet - see https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47865 Thanks D. Crocker -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
How is the default value of PATH environment variable being set in Fedora?
Hi! When I login using terminal (for instance after pressing CTRL+ALT+F2) the `PATH ` environment variable looks like this: `/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.local/bin:/home/user/bin` However when I open new Konsole window it looks like this: `/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.local/bin:/home/user/bin` Notice, that in the first case `/usr/local/bin` precedes `/bin:/usr/bin` whereas in the second case it's the other way around. What mechanism governs this and how can I configure it so that in the second case `/usr/local/bin` precedes `/usr/bin`? I took a look in `/etc/profile` but there I see only `/usr/local/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` being set: # Path manipulation if [ $EUID = 0 ]; then pathmunge /usr/sbin pathmunge /usr/local/sbin else pathmunge /usr/local/sbin after pathmunge /usr/sbin after fi In the `/etc/environment` I have nothing that sets or changes `PATH`. I know I can overwrite `PATH` in one of bash rc scripts but I would like to know how this default `PATH` is being set in the first place. I'm on KDE spin of Fedora 21. Thank you in advance. Regards, Piotr Dobrogost -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How is the default value of PATH environment variable being set in Fedora?
On 12/17/2014 09:38 AM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote: Hi! When I login using terminal (for instance after pressing CTRL+ALT+F2) the `PATH ` environment variable looks like this: `/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.local/bin:/home/user/bin` However when I open new Konsole window it looks like this: `/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.local/bin:/home/user/bin` Notice, that in the first case `/usr/local/bin` precedes `/bin:/usr/bin` whereas in the second case it's the other way around. What mechanism governs this and how can I configure it so that in the second case `/usr/local/bin` precedes `/usr/bin`? I took a look in `/etc/profile` but there I see only `/usr/local/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` being set: # Path manipulation if [ $EUID = 0 ]; then pathmunge /usr/sbin pathmunge /usr/local/sbin else pathmunge /usr/local/sbin after pathmunge /usr/sbin after fi In the `/etc/environment` I have nothing that sets or changes `PATH`. I know I can overwrite `PATH` in one of bash rc scripts but I would like to know how this default `PATH` is being set in the first place. Hi Piotr, if I remember well, I think in earlier times it was the *init* process, or *getty* setting the default PATH, so nowadays it could be done by systemd (or child proc)??? I'm on KDE spin of Fedora 21. Thank you in advance. Regards, Piotr Dobrogost -- Fedora release 21 (Twenty One) Kernel-3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64 Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How is the default value of PATH environment variable being set in Fedora?
On 12/17/14 16:38, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
Hi!
When I login using terminal (for instance after pressing CTRL+ALT+F2)
the `PATH ` environment variable looks like this:
`/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.local/bin:/home/user/bin`
However when I open new Konsole window it looks like this:
`/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/user/.local/bin:/home/user/bin`
Notice, that in the first case `/usr/local/bin` precedes
`/bin:/usr/bin` whereas in the second case it's the other way around.
What mechanism governs this and how can I configure it so that in the
second case `/usr/local/bin` precedes `/usr/bin`?
I took a look in `/etc/profile` but there I see only `/usr/local/sbin`
and `/usr/sbin` being set:
# Path manipulation
if [ $EUID = 0 ]; then
pathmunge /usr/sbin
pathmunge /usr/local/sbin
else
pathmunge /usr/local/sbin after
pathmunge /usr/sbin after
fi
In the `/etc/environment` I have nothing that sets or changes `PATH`.
I know I can overwrite `PATH` in one of bash rc scripts but I would
like to know how this default `PATH` is being set in the first place.
I'm on KDE spin of Fedora 21.
Thank you in advance.
Look in your ~/.bashrc and, if you've not changed anything, you'll see
# Source global definitions
if [ -f /etc/bashrc ]; then
. /etc/bashrc
fi
And then look in /etc/bashrc and you'll see
if ! shopt -q login_shell ; then # We're not a login shell
# Need to redefine pathmunge, it get's undefined at the end of /etc/profile
pathmunge () {
case :${PATH}: in
*:$1:*)
;;
*)
if [ $2 = after ] ; then
PATH=$PATH:$1
else
PATH=$1:$PATH
fi
esac
}
So, it depends on if your shell is a login shell or not.
Also, other bits in $PATH are set via scripts in /etc/profile.d/ .
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
xinit -- :1 Not working for F21
People, I occasionally start a second X display from a console login with: xinit -- :1 but after upgrading to F21 it just hangs with an underscore in the top left of the screen and I have to do a remote log in and kill the process. I attach the log but I am not sure if it indicates what the problem is . . Thanks, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au[268529.302] X.Org X Server 1.16.2 Release Date: 2014-11-10 [268529.305] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 [268529.305] Build Operating System: 3.17.2-200.fc20.x86_64 [268529.306] Current Operating System: Linux prix.pricom.com.au 3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 8 22:29:32 UTC 2014 x86_64 [268529.306] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64 root=UUID=be90fc04-c832-426e-8268-b1d53ca57ed5 ro vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 LANG=en_AU.UTF-8 [268529.309] Build Date: 21 November 2014 01:15:20AM [268529.310] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.16.2-1.fc21 [268529.310] Current version of pixman: 0.32.6 [268529.312]Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. [268529.312] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. [268529.315] (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.1.log, Time: Wed Dec 17 20:13:57 2014 [268529.316] (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf [268529.317] (==) Using config directory: /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d [268529.318] (==) Using system config directory /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d [268529.318] (==) ServerLayout X.org Configured [268529.318] (**) |--Screen Screen0 (0) [268529.318] (**) | |--Monitor Monitor0 [268529.318] (**) | |--Device Card0 [268529.319] (**) |--Input Device Mouse0 [268529.319] (**) |--Input Device Keyboard0 [268529.319] (**) Option BlankTime 600 [268529.319] (**) Option StandbyTime 1200 [268529.319] (**) Option SuspendTime 1800 [268529.319] (**) Option OffTime 2400 [268529.319] (==) Automatically adding devices [268529.319] (==) Automatically enabling devices [268529.319] (==) Automatically adding GPU devices [268529.319] (**) FontPath set to: catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d, built-ins, catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d, built-ins [268529.319] (**) ModulePath set to /usr/lib64/xorg/modules [268529.319] (WW) Hotplugging is on, devices using drivers 'kbd', 'mouse' or 'vmmouse' will be disabled. [268529.319] (WW) Disabling Mouse0 [268529.319] (WW) Disabling Keyboard0 [268529.319] (II) Loader magic: 0x81de40 [268529.319] (II) Module ABI versions: [268529.319]X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4 [268529.319]X.Org Video Driver: 18.0 [268529.319]X.Org XInput driver : 21.0 [268529.319]X.Org Server Extension : 8.0 [268529.321] (II) systemd-logind: took control of session /org/freedesktop/login1/session/_34603 [268529.322] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) [268529.322] (II) systemd-logind: got fd for /dev/dri/card0 226:0 fd 10 paused 0 [268529.324] (--) PCI:*(0:0:2:0) 8086:2e22:8086:5002 rev 3, Mem @ 0xd000/4194304, 0xc000/268435456, I/O @ 0xf1c0/8, BIOS @ 0x/131072 [268529.324] (--) PCI: (0:0:2:1) 8086:2e23:8086:5002 rev 3, Mem @ 0xd040/1048576, BIOS @ 0x/65536 [268529.324] (II) glx will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also specified in the config file. [268529.324] (II) LoadModule: dbe [268529.324] (II) Module dbe already built-in [268529.324] (II) LoadModule: dri [268529.324] (II) Module dri already built-in [268529.324] (II) LoadModule: dri2 [268529.324] (II) Module dri2 already built-in [268529.324] (II) LoadModule: extmod [268529.324] (II) Module extmod already built-in [268529.324] (II) LoadModule: glx [268529.324] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so [268529.350] (II) Module glx: vendor=X.Org Foundation [268529.350]compiled for 1.16.2, module version = 1.0.0 [268529.350]ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 8.0 [268529.350] (==) AIGLX enabled [268529.350] (II) LoadModule: record [268529.350] (II) Module record already built-in [268529.350] (II) LoadModule: vnc [268529.350] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module vnc [268529.350] (II) UnloadModule: vnc [268529.350] (II) Unloading vnc [268529.350] (EE) Failed to load module vnc (module does not exist, 0) [268529.350] (II) LoadModule: intel [268529.350] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so [268529.351] (II) Module intel: vendor=X.Org Foundation [268529.351]compiled for 1.16.1, module version = 2.99.916 [268529.351]Module class: X.Org Video Driver [268529.351]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 18.0 [268529.351] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Integrated Graphics Chipsets: i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815, i830M, 845G, 854, 852GM/855GM, 865G, 915G, E7221 (i915), 915GM, 945G, 945GM, 945GME, Pineview GM,
Re: xinit -- :1 Not working for F21
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:40:33 +1100 Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au wrote: I occasionally start a second X display from a console login with: xinit -- :1 but after upgrading to F21 it just hangs with an underscore in the top left of the screen and I have to do a remote log in and kill the process. I attach the log but I am not sure if it indicates what the problem is . . I'd try to look into the cause of these: [268529.443] (II) intel(0): switch to mode 1440x900@60.0 on VGA1 using pipe 0, position (0, 0), rotation normal, reflection none [268529.449] (EE) intel(0): failed to set mode: Permission denied [13] [268529.450] (WW) intel(0): failed to restore desired modes on VT switch [268529.450] (EE) intel(0): sna_mode_check: invalid state found on pipe 0, disabling CRTC:7 The permission denied piece smells bad... :-) HTH, :-) Marko -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Canon LIDE 120 scanner - should I expect this never to work?
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Frank McCormick bea...@videotron.ca wrote: On 15/12/14 11:41 AM, poma wrote: You can try to temporarily resolve via udev rule, although this is material for bugzilla, downstream and upstream. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/sane/sane-backends.git/tree/README.linux #n8 Permissions: While SANE automatically uses libusb when the library and its header file were present during the build of sane-backends, setting permissions will require some attention. So if scanimage -L lists your scanner as root but not as normal user read on this text. ... Canon CanoScan N1240U/LiDE30 udev rule examples http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/sane/sane-backends.git/tree/testsuite/tools/data/udev+acl.ref#n588 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/sane/sane-backends.git/tree/testsuite/tools/data/udev.ref#n588 Arrivederci I have basically the same scanner ---LIDE20 --- and it wasn't working either although sane-find-scanner found it on USB. This fixed my problem: sudo yum install sane-backends-drivers-scanners.i686 I also uncommented the proper line in /etc/sane.d/canon_dr.conf Hi, @Frank_McCormick: unfortunately your solution doesn't work for me. @poma: before touching udev I opted for bugzilla ;) I've found an already opened bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100151 Cheers, -- Marco -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: (fedora) Re: Fedora and Windows fighting for the bootsector
Chris Murphy wrote on 16-DEC-2014 21:49:23.97 On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Jouk Jansen joukj at hrem.nano.tudelft.nl wrote: BootCurrent: 0005 Timeout: 0 seconds Bootorder: 0005,0003,,0001,0002 Boot* Fedora Boot0001* UEFI: IP4 Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller Boot0002* UEFI: IP6 Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller Boot0003* Windows Boot Manager Boot0005* grub It's UEFI, and you have two GRUBs now, the Fedora prebaked one as part of the grub2-efi package, which is the Boot Fedora entry and is found in /boot/efi/EFI/fedora, and the grub2-install one which is the Boot0005 grub entry and is found in /boot/efi/EFI/grub. They also have different grub.cfgs; the Fedora one goes in /boot/efi/EFI/fedora and the grub one goes in /boot/grub2. Thanks for the explenation. This is my first UEFI machine, so it is easy to make mistakes. Please do this first and post all results: $ parted /dev/sda u s p $ efibootmgr -v $ tree /boot/efi $ os-prober And then to fix the NVRAM extra grub entry and reset the boot order and make a new grub.cfg: $ efibootmgr -b 0005 -B $ efibootmgr -o ,0003,0001,0002 $ grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg Optional: ?$ rm -rf boot/efi/EFI/grub I'm away from the laptop now. I will try in the next couple of days. But this looks like the right thing to do. I will let you now if it is succesful. If you can put the new grub.cfg somewhere to download that'd be useful, I'd like to confirm it finds \efi\microsoft\boot\bootmgfw.efi and has the entry correct. Error message: error: file `EFI/Microsoft/Boot/bootmgfw.efi' not found error: you need to load the kernel first. Press any key to continue... OK this is a GRUB error message, not a Windows boot loader error message. GRUB can't find the Windows EFI OS Loader for some reason, so hopefully things will either be fixed or enlightened after I see the tree output and the new grub.cfg. I hope the change in boot-order as decribed above, will solve the problem. Thanks Jouk Jansen Pax, vel iniusta, utilior est quam iustissimum bellum. (free after Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 b.Chr.-46 b.Chr.) Epistularum ad Atticum 7.1.4.3) Touch not the cat bot a glove -- Jouk Jansen jo...@hrem.nano.tudelft.nl Technische Universiteit Delfttt uu uu ddd Kavli Institute of Nanoscience tt uu uu dddd Nationaal centrum voor HREM tt uu uu dd dd Lorentzweg 1 tt uu uu dd dd 2628 CJ Delfttt uu uu dd dd Nederlandtt uu uu dddd tel. 31-15-2782272 tt uuu ddd -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Won't stay on this page http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options
It's a problem with the entire website. There's a bad line of code in the header: meta http-equiv=refresh content=0;url=https://getfedora.org;¬ which redirects everyone back to the main page. I've emailed the webmaster with details. BTW, you can use wget to download the page and find the links you need from there. That's how I found the problem. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Jim Lewis j...@jklewis.com wrote: When I go to the above mentioned link I can see the page for a second or two, then it throws me into https://getfedora.org. It looks to be intentional. Happens on all my systems (including Fedora 21), and are all running relatively new versions of Firefox. Can anyone else get to that page (and stay on it)? Jim Lewis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So acrobat is dead for linux - long live evince?
MasterPdfEditor is horribly slow to display my pdfs, which contain matplotlib pdfs with thousands of data points. evince is very fast at this. evince chokes on PDF files with heavy bitmap-image content, like dense city GIS maps. (Probably due to poorly-implemented scaling internally; gtk routines don't do scaling well.) okular handles them fine. You have to pick-and-choose linux PDF readers depending on the application, unfortunately. - Mike -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: selinux relabel at boot
I will schedule a relabel and take a look at my box. ssd relabel is pretty quick. On 12/16/2014 06:07 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:58:41 -0500 Daniel J Walsh wrote: What version of Fedora was this? A brand new fedora 21 workstation install. restorecon -p -R / 7.4%^C Shows Percent done now. I'm not sure the actual percentage makes it through systemd though to the messages I was looking at during boot (I had rhgb turned off, so I was booting in text mode). I'm really not sure though if the percent was there and I just didn't notice it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Cannot contact any KDC for realm since upgrading to Fedora 21
I upgraded a Kerberos server box from Fedara 20 to 21. Since doing so,
other Fedora machines (which are still using Fedora 20) can no longer
authenticate:
$ kinit
kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm 'ENDOFRAME.NET' while getting
initial credentials
On the server:
# systemctl status krb5kdc
● krb5kdc.service - Kerberos 5 KDC
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/krb5kdc.service; enabled)
Active: active (running) since Tue 2014-12-16 08:27:54 EST; 24h
ago
Process: 22776 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/krb5kdc -P /var/run/krb5kdc.pid
$KRB5KDC_ARGS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 22777 (krb5kdc)
CGroup: /system.slice/krb5kdc.service
└─22777 /usr/sbin/krb5kdc -P /var/run/krb5kdc.pid
And I'm able to kinit just fine locally on the server.
I've tried completely disabling firewalls; that didn't help.
/var/log/krb5kdc.log on the server looks like this:
otp: Loaded
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](Error): preauth
pkinit failed to initialize: No realms configured correctly for pkinit
support
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): setting up
network...
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): listening
on fd 12: udp 0.0.0.0.88 (pktinfo)
krb5kdc: setsockopt(13,IPV6_V6ONLY,1) worked
krb5kdc: Invalid argument - Cannot request packet info for udp socket
address :: port 88
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): skipping
unrecognized local address family 17
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): skipping
unrecognized local address family 17
krb5kdc: setsockopt(13,IPV6_V6ONLY,1) worked
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): listening
on fd 13: udp fe80::21c:c0ff:fedf:4b55%eth0.88
krb5kdc: setsockopt(14,IPV6_V6ONLY,1) worked
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): listening
on fd 15: tcp 0.0.0.0.88
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): listening
on fd 14: tcp ::.88
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): set up 4
sockets
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22777](info): commencing
operation
Dec 17 08:52:59 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22777](info): AS_REQ (6
etypes {18 17 16 23 25 26}) 192.168.1.10: ISSUE: authtime 1418824379,
etypes {rep=18 tkt=18 ses=18}, bra...@endoframe.net for
krbtgt/endoframe@endoframe.net
Where should I be looking?
--
Braden McDaniel
bra...@endoframe.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot contact any KDC for realm since upgrading to Fedora 21
selinux?
On 12/17/2014 03:12 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I upgraded a Kerberos server box from Fedara 20 to 21. Since doing so,
other Fedora machines (which are still using Fedora 20) can no longer
authenticate:
$ kinit
kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm 'ENDOFRAME.NET' while getting
initial credentials
On the server:
# systemctl status krb5kdc
● krb5kdc.service - Kerberos 5 KDC
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/krb5kdc.service; enabled)
Active: active (running) since Tue 2014-12-16 08:27:54 EST; 24h ago
Process: 22776 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/krb5kdc -P /var/run/krb5kdc.pid
$KRB5KDC_ARGS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 22777 (krb5kdc)
CGroup: /system.slice/krb5kdc.service
└─22777 /usr/sbin/krb5kdc -P /var/run/krb5kdc.pid
And I'm able to kinit just fine locally on the server.
I've tried completely disabling firewalls; that didn't help.
/var/log/krb5kdc.log on the server looks like this:
otp: Loaded
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](Error): preauth
pkinit failed to initialize: No realms configured correctly for pkinit
support
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): setting up
network...
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): listening
on fd 12: udp 0.0.0.0.88 (pktinfo)
krb5kdc: setsockopt(13,IPV6_V6ONLY,1) worked
krb5kdc: Invalid argument - Cannot request packet info for udp socket
address :: port 88
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): skipping
unrecognized local address family 17
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): skipping
unrecognized local address family 17
krb5kdc: setsockopt(13,IPV6_V6ONLY,1) worked
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): listening
on fd 13: udp fe80::21c:c0ff:fedf:4b55%eth0.88
krb5kdc: setsockopt(14,IPV6_V6ONLY,1) worked
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): listening
on fd 15: tcp 0.0.0.0.88
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): listening
on fd 14: tcp ::.88
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22776](info): set up 4
sockets
Dec 16 08:27:54 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22777](info): commencing
operation
Dec 17 08:52:59 knock.endoframe.net krb5kdc[22777](info): AS_REQ (6
etypes {18 17 16 23 25 26}) 192.168.1.10: ISSUE: authtime 1418824379,
etypes {rep=18 tkt=18 ses=18}, bra...@endoframe.net for
krbtgt/endoframe@endoframe.net
Where should I be looking?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: xinit -- :1 Not working for F21
Marko, On 2014-12-17 21:22, Marko Vojinovic wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:40:33 +1100 Philip Rhoades p...@pricom.com.au wrote: I occasionally start a second X display from a console login with: xinit -- :1 but after upgrading to F21 it just hangs with an underscore in the top left of the screen and I have to do a remote log in and kill the process. I attach the log but I am not sure if it indicates what the problem is . . I'd try to look into the cause of these: [268529.443] (II) intel(0): switch to mode 1440x900@60.0 on VGA1 using pipe 0, position (0, 0), rotation normal, reflection none [268529.449] (EE) intel(0): failed to set mode: Permission denied [13] [268529.450] (WW) intel(0): failed to restore desired modes on VT switch [268529.450] (EE) intel(0): sna_mode_check: invalid state found on pipe 0, disabling CRTC:7 The permission denied piece smells bad... :-) It appears that the process is waiting for the other X process to terminate - I think it might have something to do with F21 now running X as rootless and maybe Kernel Mode Setting? I found that the following now works (and does what I want - where it didn't before): startx -- :1 Regards, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: p...@pricom.com.au -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot contact any KDC for realm since upgrading to Fedora 21
On 2014-12-17 09:37, fedora wrote: selinux? It's set to permissive on the F21 (server) box; shouldn't that be sufficient? Or do I need to disable it completely to make sure it isn't interfering? -- Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So acrobat is dead for linux - long live evince?
On 12/17/2014 08:47 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: MasterPdfEditor is horribly slow to display my pdfs, which contain matplotlib pdfs with thousands of data points. evince is very fast at this. evince chokes on PDF files with heavy bitmap-image content, like dense city GIS maps. (Probably due to poorly-implemented scaling internally; gtk routines don't do scaling well.) okular handles them fine. You have to pick-and-choose linux PDF readers depending on the application, unfortunately. - Mike How about the addition of digital signatures? Is Adobe the only option here? -- Roger Wells, P.E. leidos 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@leidos.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cannot contact any KDC for realm since upgrading to Fedora 21
On 12/17/2014 10:19 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote: On 2014-12-17 09:37, fedora wrote: selinux? It's set to permissive on the F21 (server) box; shouldn't that be sufficient? Or do I need to disable it completely to make sure it isn't interfering? If it is in permissive then SELinux is not the issue. Would prefer that you ran in enforcing mode though. :^) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
filezilla going crazy
I had to downgrade filezilla from filezilla-3.9.0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 to filezilla-3.8.1-3.fc21.x86_64 because the newer version put uses 50% of the cpu on startup, even when not connected to anything. Is this just me or anyone else seeing problems with today's upgrade of filezilla? -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So acrobat is dead for linux - long live evince?
2014-12-17 0:45 GMT+01:00, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au: Allegedly, on or about 16 December 2014, Chris Murphy sent: Android 7.61MB. This just displays them, there's no creation or modification as far as I'm aware. So it's possible most of the code complexity is in the creation and modification. The point is that as any software becomes more capable it necessarily gets bigger. It gets more capable because more people are using, supporting, and coding it. And users are continuously asking for new features and that means it's going to get bigger. So I'm suggesting any successful PDF creator/modifier is going to be a big binary. But when one application gets as big as an entire operating system, or even bigger?! I can't believe that a well designed application should need to be that bloated. And it's only a document handler, not a bloody virtual reality flight simulator. I understand your sentiment, but acroread is probably as big as it is because it's statically linked (or so I think; I can't check it now). That's probably their only option, given that they want to stay distro and version agnostic as much as possibble. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Won't stay on this page http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options
It's a problem with the entire website. There's a bad line of code in the header: meta http-equiv=refresh content=0;url=https://getfedora.org;¬ which redirects everyone back to the main page. I've emailed the webmaster with details. BTW, you can use wget to download the page and find the links you need from there. That's how I found the problem. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Jim Lewis j...@jklewis.com wrote: When I go to the above mentioned link I can see the page for a second or two, then it throws me into https://getfedora.org. It looks to be intentional. Happens on all my systems (including Fedora 21), and are all running relatively new versions of Firefox. Can anyone else get to that page (and stay on it)? Jim Lewis Hi Ted, Yes, I had already used wget, that's why I said it looked intentional. I was mainly trying to find the Fedora 21 full install DVD, but I now understand that it is no longer provided. Jim Lewis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday
break Reply-To: Reposted from http://fedoramagazine.org/5tftw-2014-12-17/. Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to keep up with everything that goes on. This series highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week. It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links to each. Here are the five things for December 17th, 2014: Fedora 21 Retrospective: What was awesome? What wasn’t? --- While Fedora 22 is already rolling into the target zone, we do want to make sure we look back at this previous cycle and identify things we can improve — ideally, specific and actionable changes. In the end, we came out with (another!) great release, but there is always something to learn. In particular, we ended _yet again_ in a last minute scramble to get a release we could feel good about signing off on out before the holidays, and next time around it would be nice to put less stress on all of our contributors (including the quality assurance team and the developers needed to make those late fixes.) There will be more to it than this, but to get started, we have a F21 Retrospective wiki page, to help collect comments and ideas. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Retrospective Fedora 22: Coming up fast! -- FESCo (the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee, the elected organization which oversees technical decisions in the project) has indicated that we’re back to aiming for the traditional May/October Fedora release cycle, and although the F22 schedule isn’t finalized yet, we have a tentative plan calling for a release about 6 months from now. When you work back from that, it means that there’s really not much time to think about change proposals for F22, especially if we subtract out holiday time. So, if you’re thinking of working on something big, please start getting your proposal formalized — the tentative deadline is January 20th, 2015. Fedora 19: End of Life -- And on the other end of the cycle: it’s time to say farewell to Fedora 19. If you’re running this release, please plan to update before January 6th, 2015, when the last updates will go out. After that, there will be no further security fixes. The good news is that Fedora 20 was a great release, and Fedora 21 is *even better*, and I think you’ll be happy with the upgrade. * http://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-19-eol-01-06-2015/ Fedora Workstation firewall discussion -- This week’s big devel-list thread concerned the default firewall settings in Fedora Workstation. The Fedora Workstation Working Group was not happy with the user experience offered by blocking incoming “high ports” by default. Out of the box, nothing is listening on these, but if one installs software that expects to, it won’t work, and because we don’t have a good way yet to tie *attempts* to access ports to listening applications and communicate that to the user, the resulting failure is invisible. On the other hand, if you install something and it starts listening and you didn’t know that, that’s *also* invisible. So, pretty much everyone recognizes this as a not ideal situation. Everyone involved in the discussion also is concerned with enhancing user security in practice — the question is just how to best get there from an imperfect state. Originally, the Workstation WG asked to disable the firewall entirely. FESCo asked instead that it be left available, possibly with a less-restrictive out-of-the-box configuration — the path taken for F21. If you’re not running Workstation, this doesn’t affect you. If you are, and would like a different configuration, run the firewall configuration tool and either edit the Fedora Workstation zone or change the default zone. (There’s a long list of options, but “public” is a generally-restrictive choice.) You can also change the per-network zone. Unfortunately currently wired networks are all considered as one per interface, but wireless networks are distinguished individually. This can be done in a number of ways, but the easiest is to run the network configuration tool (in GNOME control center — press the overview key and start typing “network”), select the wifi network in question, press the little gear icon next to it, go down to Identity (?!), and choose the appropriate firewall zone. (Again, there’s a long list — go back to the firewall config tool to see exactly what they all do.) This is clearly, not the most friendly approach; it’s my understanding that the desktop designers, network tools team, and security team are going to work together to develop a better overall solution for Fedora 22 and beyond. Overall, the mailing list thread stayed relatively positive and constructive and avoided personal attacks, although there were some accusations of bad faith actions which do not seem warranted based on the actual history. It is, however, a case where
RPMfusion non-free packages not ready?
I have just upgraded two different machines to F21. I dutifully went through all the clean-up steps afterward. I also kept an Ethernet connection during the boot-to-system-upgrade step. The fedup program took a downgrade, and yes, I have to remove Google Chrome and then re-install it to get the F21 build. All as the fedup page told me to expect. (And, no, I did /not/ lose wireless connectivity. When I pulled the Ethernet plug on each system, its wireless adapter immediately found my router and re-established the connection I had set up earlier.) This no one told me to expect: it said the RPMfusion non-free packages for F21 were not ready. What do I wait for next? Will my systems, once RPMfusion pushes those packages, be able to see them and update the system? Thanks in advance. Temlakos -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Won't stay on this page http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options
On Dec 16, 2014 7:32 PM, Jim Lewis j...@jklewis.com wrote: Yes, when I couldn't find the full install DVD I settled for the Mate-Compiz spin and have been configuring it for the last few days. I now have to manually install a whole lot of packages that were just there by default before. Jim Lewis Out of curiosity, what are you considering the default here? --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: filezilla going crazy
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote: I had to downgrade filezilla from filezilla-3.9.0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 to filezilla-3.8.1-3.fc21.x86_64 because the newer version put uses 50% of the cpu on startup, even when not connected to anything. Is this just me or anyone else seeing problems with today's upgrade of filezilla? I am seeing this, too. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So acrobat is dead for linux - long live evince?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Allegedly, on or about 16 December 2014, Chris Murphy sent: Android 7.61MB. This just displays them, there's no creation or modification as far as I'm aware. So it's possible most of the code complexity is in the creation and modification. The point is that as any software becomes more capable it necessarily gets bigger. It gets more capable because more people are using, supporting, and coding it. And users are continuously asking for new features and that means it's going to get bigger. So I'm suggesting any successful PDF creator/modifier is going to be a big binary. But when one application gets as big as an entire operating system, or even bigger?! I can't believe that a well designed application should need to be that bloated. And it's only a document handler, not a bloody virtual reality flight simulator. For example: The Preflight plugin for Acrobat Pro on OS X is 126MB by itself. The actual preflight library is 36MB, but the bulk of what remains are localization files. There aren't separate Chinese and English builds. Each localization file is 1-3MB and there are ~20 of those. The Comments plugin is the same thing, a ton of its 41MB size is due to localization. The stamps for sign here are translated into 24 languages, I have all of them. Meanwhile the eBook plugin is merely 190KB. It's also localized, each localized file is about 4KB. So it's just a matter of how complicated some function is, and then that gets magnified by localization. Is this bloat? Well, I don't think it's the kind of bloat from inefficient or poorly designed coding I think it's just a packaging and deployment decision that makes things a lot easier for Adobe, and a significant minority of customers who will use 2-3 localizations. Sure the majority who probably only use 1 language ends up storing a bunch of stuff they aren't ever going to use, but, oh well. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So acrobat is dead for linux - long live evince?
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Roger Wells roger.k.we...@leidos.com wrote: On 12/17/2014 08:47 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: MasterPdfEditor is horribly slow to display my pdfs, which contain matplotlib pdfs with thousands of data points. evince is very fast at this. evince chokes on PDF files with heavy bitmap-image content, like dense city GIS maps. (Probably due to poorly-implemented scaling internally; gtk routines don't do scaling well.) okular handles them fine. You have to pick-and-choose linux PDF readers depending on the application, unfortunately. - Mike How about the addition of digital signatures? Is Adobe the only option here? I gotta say there are parts of this that are quite ugly with Acrobat. Yes I get a GUI that helps me create self-signed certs and incorporate a real digitized signature (scanned or photographed); but it puts the signature file in a f'n obscure location and 3 out of 4 migrations to new systems and versions of Acrobat I either can't figure out where that file is, or once I find it, the new version won't eat the old signature. So now I have probably 5 self-signed digital signature files floating around all with different passwords. And with self-signing there's no verification of the signer. All we really know is whether the document has been modified since it was signed, and maybe if the public key has since been revoked (although I'm not sure how that mechanism works). I still find it better than faxes, and I won't send PDFs with merely an image of my signature because such PDFs can be altered while providing neither party a way to prove or disprove that alteration. http://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/DigSig/Acrobat_DigitalSignatures_in_PDF.pdf -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Won't stay on this page http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Jim Lewis j...@jklewis.com wrote: It's a problem with the entire website. There's a bad line of code in the header: Yes, I had already used wget, that's why I said it looked intentional. I was mainly trying to find the Fedora 21 full install DVD, but I now understand that it is no longer provided. I got feedback from one of the fedora web people that this is an intentional thing with the intent to discourage the use of fedoraproject.org in favor of getfedora.org as the primary website. I think it could have been handled more gracefully. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So acrobat is dead for linux - long live evince?
On 12/16/2014 01:49 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/16/2014 07:30 AM, Sudhir Khanger wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: Being a happy KDE user, I like okular. And I use it not just for pdf, but a whole assortment of other document formats like dvi, djvu, ps, epub, and so on. Okular is indeed the best pdf reader irrespective of what desktop environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as Okular's. What disqualifies okular for me is this: # yum install okular ... Install 1 Package (+50 Dependent packages) ... Total download size: 70 M Installed size: 176 M ... This probably doesn't matter much to kde users, but pulling in 50 additional packages and 176 M to me is a serious issue. But if you have already installed K3B then: Install 1 Package (+13 Dependent packages) Total download size: 3.2 M Installed size 9.5M Or is there something else you use rather than K3B? (start yet another big discussion!) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Won't stay on this page http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options
On Dec 16, 2014 7:32 PM, Jim Lewis j...@jklewis.com wrote: Yes, when I couldn't find the full install DVD I settled for the Mate-Compiz spin and have been configuring it for the last few days. I now have to manually install a whole lot of packages that were just there by default before. Jim Lewis Out of curiosity, what are you considering the default here? --Pete Hi Pete, Probably a poor choice of words on my part. By default to ME means not having to install gcc, Java, LibreOffice, wget, strace, etc., and fix things like Firefox associations (which I don't yet know how to do). The installs of Fedora 1 through 14 made sense (didn't use 15 and 16 because of Gnome 3). Versions 17-20 made sense as well. It's possible the Fedora-Server-inst ISO would have been what I wanted if it hadn't failed during the install. I just had some good luck. Installed the RPM Fusion files and have xmms working with mp3 files. Now to see if Flash is going to work ... Jim Lewis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Xfce wireshark gui?
What do I use for a gui for wireshark with Xfce? The gnome one? I already installed gthumb, as I have not found as nice a jpg viewer as it. :) More apps fun! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Won't stay on this page http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options
On Dec 17, 2014 3:10 PM, Jim Lewis j...@jklewis.com wrote: On Dec 16, 2014 7:32 PM, Jim Lewis j...@jklewis.com wrote: Yes, when I couldn't find the full install DVD I settled for the Mate-Compiz spin and have been configuring it for the last few days. I now have to manually install a whole lot of packages that were just there by default before. Jim Lewis Out of curiosity, what are you considering the default here? --Pete Hi Pete, Probably a poor choice of words on my part. By default to ME means not having to install gcc, Java, LibreOffice, wget, strace, etc., and fix things like Firefox associations (which I don't yet know how to do). The installs of Fedora 1 through 14 made sense (didn't use 15 and 16 because of Gnome 3). Versions 17-20 made sense as well. It's possible the Fedora-Server-inst ISO would have been what I wanted if it hadn't failed during the install. I just had some good luck. Installed the RPM Fusion files and have xmms working with mp3 files. Now to see if Flash is going to work ... Jim Lewis Okay, I thought it might be something like that :) There is of course no 'Jim' or 'Pete' package set on any install media, but I'll share a trick: use the `show-installed` utility. It can create a list of packages for you to feed to yum after install, or create a kickstart format for use during install. --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F21 minimal install?
On 12/16/2014 04:22 PM, Andras Simon wrote: On Dec 16, 2014 6:58 PM, Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com mailto:arequip...@gmail.com wrote: Do any of the F21 installation media provide a minimal install option anymore? IIRC, the basic server (or whatever it's called) now installs more than 600 packages, around twice as many as the F20 minimal install. If you use a netinstall image from https://getfedora.org/en/server/download/ then you can do a minimal install. That's only 247 packages. The netinst is kind of interesting. It is in the server part of the tree. But you go in to select which software to install and you can choose a server or a workstation configuration. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: filezilla going crazy
On 12/17/2014 03:27 PM, Steven Rosenberg wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote: I had to downgrade filezilla from filezilla-3.9.0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 to filezilla-3.8.1-3.fc21.x86_64 because the newer version put uses 50% of the cpu on startup, even when not connected to anything. Is this just me or anyone else seeing problems with today's upgrade of filezilla? I am seeing this, too. Thanks. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175531 -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Dragon can't find its codecs after upgrade to F21
I've found my first problem after upgrading to F21. Back when I was running F20, I had managed to find and install just about every codec I needed to play videos of every description in Dragon. Now, Dragon is trying to install those codecs and finding out I already have them installed. Or do I? Sometimes when I try to install something, it starts talking about all the unresolved dependencies it has. This affects video and audio codecs for Dragon. Now the only thing that works for playing video, is vlc. That still works. I get messages asking me to file a bug, but I don't know what product to file it against. Here's an example of the detailed errors I'm getting: Error running transaction: package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libbz2.so.1()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstaudio-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstbase-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstpbutils-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstreamer-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstvideo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libm.so.6()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libpthread.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libz.so.1()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: rtld(GNU_HASH) Comments? Temlakos -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Dragon can't find its codecs after upgrade to F21
Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:18:58 -0500 Temlakos temla...@gmail.com kirjoitti: Or do I? Sometimes when I try to install something, it starts talking about all the unresolved dependencies it has. Comments? Temlakos Have you got RPMFUSION repos installed, codecs are there in rpmfusion-nonfree. Jarmo -- I'm afraid, that there's no fear -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Dragon can't find its codecs after upgrade to F21
On 12/17/2014 09:05 PM, jarmo wrote: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:18:58 -0500 Temlakos temla...@gmail.com kirjoitti: Or do I? Sometimes when I try to install something, it starts talking about all the unresolved dependencies it has. Comments? Temlakos Have you got RPMFUSION repos installed, codecs are there in rpmfusion-nonfree. Jarmo Oh, I have RPMfusion installed, all right. It's just that somehow I have the codecs installed already, but Dragon won't recognize them. And when I try to remove them, I get more error messages about unsatisfied dependencies. This is the kind of message I get: Error running transaction: package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libbz2.so.1()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstaudio-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstbase-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstpbutils-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstreamer-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libgstvideo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libm.so.6()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libpthread.so.0()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libz.so.1()(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0)(64bit) package gstreamer1-libav-1.4.3-1.fc21.x86_64 has unsatisfied Requires: rtld(GNU_HASH) Temlakos -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: So acrobat is dead for linux - long live evince?
On 12/17/2014 11:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 12/16/2014 01:49 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/16/2014 07:30 AM, Sudhir Khanger wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote: Being a happy KDE user, I like okular. And I use it not just for pdf, but a whole assortment of other document formats like dvi, djvu, ps, epub, and so on. Okular is indeed the best pdf reader irrespective of what desktop environment you use. Evince doesn't have annotation tools as rich as Okular's. What disqualifies okular for me is this: # yum install okular ... Install 1 Package (+50 Dependent packages) ... Total download size: 70 M Installed size: 176 M ... This probably doesn't matter much to kde users, but pulling in 50 additional packages and 176 M to me is a serious issue. But if you have already installed K3B then: Install 1 Package (+13 Dependent packages) Total download size: 3.2 M Installed size 9.5M Or is there something else you use rather than K3B? (start yet another big discussion!) I don't use k3b, nor do I know why I should use it rsp. what I should use them for - But that's why I said, okular likely is not an issue to KDE-users :-) My standard desktop setup is xfce + very few GUI Apps + a lots of (commandline) devel tools + lots of other command line tools. Ralf -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: recovering data from a preceding installation of Fedora..
thanks to you both
I was able to copy the data I was interested
Regards
Angelo
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Robin Laing me...@telusplanet.net wrote:
On 2014-12-16 10:31, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/16/2014 09:05 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
Hi,
I I had to re install Fedora on my computer, I did it and now I have to
restore the data from the old installation.
Using an external support for the disc (USB to SATA / IDE converter) I
can access the old drive, and using Nautilus to see all the data that I
would recover, but I do not have permission to copy them (on the disk
where I made the new installation of Fedora).
I tried to mount the partition (where the data is recorded that I want
to recover), but the directories and the data that I have not mounted
directly readable ... So I can not make the transfer of data that I
need ...
What is the correct way to conduct this operation ???
It is most likely that your user ID and group ID (UID and GID) are
different on the new installation than they were on the old one. As
a result, you'll need to do the mount and copy operations as the root
user and convert the UID/GID of the files you're copying from the old
installation to the UID and GID of your account on the new system.
To find your current UID/GID, log into the new system and issue the
command id. Example:
[rick@localhost ~]$ id
uid=1000(rick) gid=1000(rick) groups=1000(rick),10(wheel)
So I'm user ID 1000 and group ID 1000. Now, as the root user, mount
your drive and use the cp -an command to copy the files from the old
drive to wherever you need them (the -n part will keep you from
overwriting existing files on the new system). If you really want to
stomp on everything, omit the n (e.g. cp -a only). Also keep in
mind that this will NOT copy hidden files or directories (those that
start with a ., such as .bashrc and the like). Those you have to
copy individually or use a tool such as rsync or find.
Once you're done with that, again as root, try using:
chown -R youruserID:yourgroupID /path/to/new/files
to change the UID and GIDs of the files at /path/to/new/files to your
new IDs (that you got from the id command).
That's it in a nutshell. There may be better ways to do it and you'll
have to adapt these instructions to fit your particular case.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- I'd explain it to you, but your brain might explode. -
--
If you have copies of the /etc/passwd and /etc/groups files, then you have
an option to move your users to the new machine and then it makes it much
easier to restore files.
From a file that I have used for years. UGIDLIMIT was 500 in the original.
First create a tar ball of old uses (old Linux system). Create a directory:
# mkdir /root/move/
Setup UID filter limit:
# export UGIDLIMIT=1000
Now copy /etc/passwd accounts to /root/move/passwd.mig using awk to filter
out system account (i.e. only copy user accounts)
# awk -v LIMIT=$UGIDLIMIT -F: '($3=LIMIT) ($3!=65534)' /etc/passwd
/root/move/passwd.mig
Copy /etc/group file:
# awk -v LIMIT=$UGIDLIMIT -F: '($3=LIMIT) ($3!=65534)' /etc/group
/root/move/group.mig
Copy /etc/shadow file:
# awk -v LIMIT=$UGIDLIMIT -F: '($3=LIMIT) ($3!=65534) {print $1}'
/etc/passwd | tee - |egrep -f - /etc/shadow /root/move/shadow.mig
Make a backup of /home and /var/spool/mail dirs:
# tar -zcvpf /root/move/home.tar.gz /home
# tar -zcvpf /root/move/mail.tar.gz /var/spool/mail
# mkdir /root/newsusers.bak
# cp /etc/passwd /etc/shadow /etc/group /etc/gshadow /root/newsusers.bak
Now restore passwd and other files in /etc/
# cd /path/to/location
# cat passwd.mig /etc/passwd
# cat group.mig /etc/group
# cat shadow.mig /etc/shadow
# /bin/cp gshadow.mig /etc/gshadow
Please note that you must use (append) and not (create) shell
redirection.
Now copy and extract home.tar.gz to new server /home
# cd /
# tar -zxvf /path/to/location/home.tar.gz
Now copy and extract mail.tar.gz (Mails) to new server /var/spool/mail
# cd /
# tar -zxvf /path/to/location/mail.tar.gz
Now reboot system; when the Linux comes back, your user accounts will work
as they did before on old system:
# reboot
Please note that if you are new to Linux perform above commands in a
sandbox environment. Above technique can be used to UNIX to UNIX OR UNIX to
Linux account migration. You need to make couple of changes but overall the
concept remains the same.
--
Free, full feature astronomy program at
http://www.stellarium.org
Free Office Suite at
http://www.libreoffice.org
--
users mailing list
Fedora 21: yum installed wrong version of Flash?
Hello all, Still working to get a good Fedora 21 install. Things are going well, except for Flash. I did a yum -y install flash-plugin but it doesn't seem to work (Firefox says I don't have Flash installed). localhost /temp # rpm -qa | grep flash flash-plugin-11.2.202.425-release.i386 localhost /temp # ver Fedora release 21 (Twenty One) Kernel \r on an \m (\l) Linux localhost.localdomain 3.17.4-301.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 19:09:10 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux localhost /bin # file flash-player-properties flash-player-properties: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped Looks like it installed the 32-bit version. I'm thinking this is not a bug with Fedora, but maybe somewhere else. Or maybe I did another boneheaded thing. I could probably fix this by using yum to remove the wrong one (does that really work?) and manually installing the correct one. Any ideas on this? Jim Lewis -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
