Re: pidgin video chat

2015-03-09 Thread Tim
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 04:55 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
 Does anyone know how to do video chat in pidgin? I can't figure it out
 for the life of me. I click on a contact name and the chat window
 opens. Then, under Conversation - Media I have 3 options: Audio
 call / Video call / Audio and video call. But all are inactive (grayed
 out) and so they can't be selected.

I have wondered the same.  I've come to the conclusion that only certain
IM protocols can support it, but not knowing which ones.

I have wondered if it were something that Pidgin could do, by itself,
using some particular protocol, and only use one of the instant
messenger messages to send the invite through.


-- 
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp

Linux 3.18.7-100.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Wed Feb 11 21:16:53 UTC 2015 i686

All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying
to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists.

George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not
a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: pvcreate

2015-03-09 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 03/08/2015 12:09 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Using fdisk I create a partition of 59Go (/dev/sdxy)
 Then I do a pvcreate /dev/sdxy)
 pvdisplay says:
 /dev/sdb7 is a new physical volume of 38.00 GiB
 
 This probably results from a previous partitioning.

Maybe you just repartitioned and missed the fdisk message
about the fact that the new partition table will be
active at next reboot. It happens if some other partitions
on the disk are in use.
In that case 38GiB is the size of the old /dev/sdb7.
Be careful.

Use cat /proc/partitions to display how the disk is seen
by the system in this moment.

-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: pidgin video chat

2015-03-09 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:54:05PM +1030, Tim wrote:
 On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 04:55 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
  Does anyone know how to do video chat in pidgin? I can't figure it out
  for the life of me. I click on a contact name and the chat window
  opens. Then, under Conversation - Media I have 3 options: Audio
  call / Video call / Audio and video call. But all are inactive (grayed
  out) and so they can't be selected.
 
 I have wondered the same.  I've come to the conclusion that only certain
 IM protocols can support it, but not knowing which ones.
 
 I have wondered if it were something that Pidgin could do, by itself,
 using some particular protocol, and only use one of the instant
 messenger messages to send the invite through.

I don't know about the other services, but the XMPP based google
accounts used to work (a bit buggy though).  But by the time libpurple
managed to work out the bugs, Google started pushing hangouts for
audio/video calls, and at some point they removed video calls over XMPP.

Prsently I don't quite know if this works with other XMPP account
providers like jabber.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [ F21 ] How to remove GNOME

2015-03-09 Thread Bill Oliver

On Sun, 8 Mar 2015, Suvayu Ali wrote:


On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 06:32:22PM -0300, Martin Cigorraga wrote:


I'm a newcomer to Fedora and still learning its ways so excuse me if my
question sounds stupid.
Now, I want to remove GNOME from my install as I use i3; from what I saw
there's no gnome-group or similar goup available, how should I proceed?


I don't know why no one else has mentioned this already.  In my opinion
it is much easier to install a minimal set, and then build your desktop
as needed rather than install the default, and get rid of Gnome.

I'm an XFCE user (with lightdm as login manager), and everytime I did a
fresh install, I used the minimal image.  You can even do a network
install.  During that I simply select the gui packages I need (some
subset of XFCE for me).  This way I have a very small set of gnome
packages.

 $ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
 18

I know 18 is not a very accurate count, but it is more or less there.
Since you are using i3, I bet you can get the list to be even shorter!
Often people say disk space is cheap, why bother?  I have a tiny 20 gig
/ on my laptop, so it does matter to me.  On my desktop, I don't care.

Hope this helps,




Yeah, my answer to most of these how do I do this complex reconfiguration thing with a box I've dicking 
around with for two days and have all sorts fo stuff gumming up the works questions is usually 
reinstall.  For me, anyway, it takes, what, 30 mins to reinstall Fedora insert spin here 
without the gunk I wish I hadn't added, but four or five hours chasing dependencies and stuff trying to 
clean a system that has a couple hundred packages installed I decided I didn't want.

A clean install is the chicken soup of system administration, IMHO.

billo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Rich Megginson

On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The 
info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working 
either , maybe they are not valid anymore.


They are not, and have been removed.  It was just too difficult to 
maintain the copr repos.  The recommended versions are now the ones 
provided by your base operating system.

See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html

As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the 
product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones.


Right.  We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in 
maintenance mode.  Is there some feature you require that is not 
available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version?  If not, then do you 
really need to upgrade?



Should I make the move to Fedora?


It depends.  Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead? The 
only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet 
available, but should be shortly.





*Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877*



--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: pvcreate

2015-03-09 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello,

I guess that you are write.
I forgot that point.
I repartitioned again, I did not get the message and pvscan gave me
the right size.
The only active partition was probably a swap partition that I finally
desactived.

Thank.

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===


 Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 at 5:03 PM
 From: Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it
 To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Subject: Re: pvcreate

 On 03/08/2015 12:09 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
  Hello,
  
  Using fdisk I create a partition of 59Go (/dev/sdxy)
  Then I do a pvcreate /dev/sdxy)
  pvdisplay says:
  /dev/sdb7 is a new physical volume of 38.00 GiB
  
  This probably results from a previous partitioning.
 
 Maybe you just repartitioned and missed the fdisk message
 about the fact that the new partition table will be
 active at next reboot. It happens if some other partitions
 on the disk are in use.
 In that case 38GiB is the size of the old /dev/sdb7.
 Be careful.
 
 Use cat /proc/partitions to display how the disk is seen
 by the system in this moment.
 
 -- 
Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
 -- 
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [ F21 ] How to remove GNOME

2015-03-09 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 08.03.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote: 

   $ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
   18

FWIW: this is an installation from the XFCE spin, with additional devel and
administration packages:

[htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
13

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Raid vs rsync -

2015-03-09 Thread Bob Goodwin


I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard 
drive into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the 
board and intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However 
I have been wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically 
rsync the drive in use with a second drive?


That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make 
certain that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss 
of data.


Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking?

Bob

--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [ F21 ] How to remove GNOME

2015-03-09 Thread Bob Goodwin



On 03/09/15 12:21, Heinz Diehl wrote:

FWIW: this is an installation from the XFCE spin, with additional devel and
administration packages:

[htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
13
Here's an XFCE Live spin I installed a few days ago with a few added 
applications:


[bobg@bobgASRockServer ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
9

Bob

--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [ F21 ] How to remove GNOME

2015-03-09 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:21:12PM +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote:
 On 08.03.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote: 
 
$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
18
 
 FWIW: this is an installation from the XFCE spin, with additional devel and
 administration packages:
 
 [htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l
 13

I know mine could be a bit lower.  I use some packages that kinda pull
in a few gnome dependencies: evince, cheese, guake, mplayer gui, etc.
There are also a few that do not show up in the above count like yelp.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Steven Stern
On 03/09/2015 04:14 PM, Mickey wrote:
 
 
 On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
 Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply
 list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons?  Those buttons are
 important to the user when they wish to deal with the message.  Why
 would you want to remove them?  You can resize this area in order to
 help minimize it

 On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote:
 How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox
 messages and email content window ?

 How do you resize it ?
 If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window
 smaller.

Install the extension Compact Headers.

-- 
-- Steve
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Mickey



On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:

Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply
list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons?  Those buttons are
important to the user when they wish to deal with the message.  Why
would you want to remove them?  You can resize this area in order to
help minimize it

On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote:

How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox
messages and email content window ?


How do you resize it ?
If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window 
smaller.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Announcing 389 Admin Server 1.1.38

2015-03-09 Thread Noriko Hosoi


   389 Admin Server 1.1.38

The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-admin version 
1.1.38 and 389-adminutil version 1.1.21.


Fedora packages are available from the EPEL7, Fedora 20, Fedora 21 and 
Rawhide repositories.


The new packages and versions are:

 * 389-admin-1.1.38-1
 * 389-adminutil-1.1.21-1

Source tarballs are available for download at Download Admin Source 
http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-admin-1.1.38.tar.bz2 and Download 
Adminutil Source 
http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-adminutil-1.1.21.tar.bz2.



 Highlights in 389-admin-1.1.38 and 389-adminutil-1.1.21

 * Several bugs are fixed including security bugs – stop using DES and
   old SSL version.


 Installation and Upgrade

See Download http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/download.html for 
information about setting up your yum repositories.


To install, use *yum install 389-ds* yum install 389-ds After install 
completes, run *setup-ds-admin.pl* to set up your directory 
server. setup-ds-admin.pl


To upgrade, use *yum upgrade* yum upgrade After upgrade completes, run 
*setup-ds-admin.pl -u* to update your directory server/admin 
server/console information. setup-ds-admin.pl -u


See Install_Guide 
http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/legacy/install-guide.html for more 
information about the initial installation, setup, and upgrade


See Source http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/development/source.html 
for information about source tarballs and SCM (git) access.



 Feedback

We are very interested in your feedback!

Please provide feedback and comments to the 389-users mailing list: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users and 
following pages:


 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.el7
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.el7
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc21
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc21
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-2.el7
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-2.el7
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-1.fc20
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-1.fc20
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-1.fc21
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-1.fc21

If you find a bug, or would like to see a new feature, file it in our 
Trac instance: https://fedorahosted.org/389



 Detailed Changelog since 389-admin-1.1.35

 * Ticket 48024 - repl-monitor invoked from adminserver cgi fails
 * Ticket 47995 - Admin Server: source code cleaning
 * Ticket 47891 - Admin Server reconfig breaks SSL config
 * Ticket 47929 - Admin Server - disable SSLv3 by default
 * Ticket 201 - nCipher HSM cannot be configured via the console
 * Ticket 47493 - Configuration Tab does not work with FIPS mode enabled
 * Ticket 47697 - Resource leak in lib/libdsa/dsalib_updown.c
 * Ticket 47860 - register-ds-admin.pl problem when following steps to
   replicate o=netscaperoot
 * Ticket 47548 - register-ds-admin does not register into remote config ds
 * Ticket 47893 - Admin Server should use Sys::Hostname instead Net::Domain
 * Ticket 47891 - Admin Server reconfig breaks SSL config
 * Ticket 47300 - Update man page for remove-ds-admin.pl
 * Ticket 47850 - “nsslapd-allow-anonymous-access: rootdse” makes login
   as “admin” fail at the first time
 * Ticket 47497 - Admin Express - remove “Security Level”
 * Ticket 47495 - admin express: wrong instance creation time
 * Ticket 47665 - Create new instance results in setting wrong ACI for
   the “cn=config” entry
 * Ticket 47478 - No groups file? error restarting Admin server
 * Ticket 47300 - [RFE] remove-ds-admin.pl: redesign the behaviour
 * Ticket 434 - admin-serv logs filling with “admserv_host_ip_check:
   ap_get_remote_host could not resolve “
 * Ticket 47563 - cannot restart directory server from console
 * Ticket 222 - Admin Express issues “Internal Server Error” when the
   Config DS is down.
 * Ticket 418 - Error with register-ds-admin.pl
 * Ticket 377 - Unchecked use of SELinux command Reviewed by: rmeggins
 * Ticket 47498 - Error Message for Failed to create the configuration
   directory server


 Detailed Changelog since 389-adminutil-1.1.19

 * Ticket 47929 - adminutil - future proof getSSLVersion
 * Ticket 47929 - Adminutil - do not use SSL3 by default
 * Ticket 47850 - “nsslapd-allow-anonymous-access: rootdse” makes login
   as “admin” fail at the first time
 * Ticket 47881 - crash during debug session in adminutil
 * Ticket 47680 - Upgraded 389-admin rpms and now I can’t
   start dirsrv-admin

http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/release-admin-1-1-38.html
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Mickey



On 03/09/2015 05:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote:

On 03/09/2015 04:14 PM, Mickey wrote:


On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:

Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply
list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons?  Those buttons are
important to the user when they wish to deal with the message.  Why
would you want to remove them?  You can resize this area in order to
help minimize it

On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote:

How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox
messages and email content window ?


How do you resize it ?
If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window
smaller.

Install the extension Compact Headers.


How do i do that ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Mickey
How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox 
messages and email content window ?


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Kevin Cummings
Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply
list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons?  Those buttons are
important to the user when they wish to deal with the message.  Why
would you want to remove them?  You can resize this area in order to
help minimize it

On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote:
 How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox
 messages and email content window ?
 

-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Announcing 389 Console 1.1.9

2015-03-09 Thread Noriko Hosoi


   389 Console 1.1.9

The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-console version 
1.1.9, 389-ds-console version 1.2.10, 389-admin-console version 1.1.10, 
and idm-console-framework version 1.1.9.


Fedora packages are available from the EPEL7, Fedora 20, Fedora 21 and 
Rawhide repositories.


The new packages and versions are:

 * 389-console-1.1.9-1
 * 389-ds-console-1.2.10-1
 * 389-admin-console-1.1.10-1
 * idm-console-framework-1.1.9-1

Source tarballs are available for download at Download 389 Console 
Source http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-console-1.1.9.tar.bz2, 
Download 389 Ds Console Source 
http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-ds-console-1.2.10.tar.bz2, 
Download 389 Admin Console Source 
http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-admin-console-1.1.10.tar.bz2 and 
Download Idm Console Framework Source 
http://www.port389.org/binaries/idm-console-framework-1.1.9.tar.bz2.



 Highlights in 389-console-1.1.9, 389-ds-console-1.2.10,
 389-admin-console-1.1.10 and idm-console-framework-1.1.9-1

 * Several bugs are fixed including security bugs – enable TLS version
   1.1 and newer; stop using old SSL version.


 Installation and Upgrade

See Download http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/download.html for 
information about setting up your yum repositories.


To install, use *yum install 389-ds* yum install 389-ds After install 
completes, run *setup-ds-admin.pl* to set up your directory 
server. setup-ds-admin.pl


To upgrade, use *yum upgrade* yum upgrade After upgrade completes, run 
*setup-ds-admin.pl -u* to update your directory server/admin 
server/console information. setup-ds-admin.pl -u


See Install_Guide 
http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/legacy/install-guide.html for more 
information about the initial installation, setup, and upgrade


See Source http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/development/source.html 
for information about source tarballs and SCM (git) access.



 Feedback

We are very interested in your feedback!

Please provide feedback and comments to the 389-users mailing list: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users and 
following pages:


 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.el7
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.el7
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.fc20
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.fc20
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.fc21
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.fc21
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.el7
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.el7
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.fc20
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.fc20
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.fc21
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.fc21
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.el7
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.el7
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.fc20
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.fc20
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.fc21
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.fc21
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-2.el7
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-2.el7
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-2.fc20
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-2.fc20
 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-1.fc21
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-1.fc21

If you find a bug, or would like to see a new feature, file it in our 
Trac instance: https://fedorahosted.org/389



 Detailed Changelog since 389-console-1.1.7

 * Ticket 47604 - 389-console: remove versioned jars from %{_javadir}
 * Ticket 97 - 389-console should provide man page


 Detailed Changelog since 389-ds-console-1.2.7

 * Bug 1022104 - Remove versioned jarfiles from
   _javadir (idm-console-framework)
 * Ticket 47994 - DS Console always sets nsSSL3 to “on” when a securty
   setting is adjusted
 * Ticket 47380 - RFE: Winsync loses connection with AD objects when
   they move from the console.
 * Ticket 135 - DS console - right clicking an object does not select
   that object
 * Ticket 47887 - DS Console does not correctly disable SSL
 * Ticket 47485 - DS instance cannot be restored from remote console
 * Ticket 47886 - DS Console - mouse wheel speed very slow
 * Ticket 176 - DS Console should timeout when mismatched port and
   protocol combination is chosen
 * Ticket 47883 - DS Console - java exception when refreshing schema
 * Ticket 96 - Window too large for Manage 

Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Robert Viduya
I'm in the same boat.  We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our 
OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon.  Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't 
an option.  But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old.

I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26.  
But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6.  So, yes, there's at least one fix 
that we need that isn't available to us.  But really, there's tons of bug fixes 
and features that have come out since then.  The longer we're held back, the 
harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we 
do upgrade.

Is compiling from source our only option?  Because, I can do that.  I'd just 
rather not have to.

On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:

 On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
 I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on 
 the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe 
 they are not valid anymore.
 
 They are not, and have been removed.  It was just too difficult to maintain 
 the copr repos.  The recommended versions are now the ones provided by your 
 base operating system.
 See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html
 
 As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product 
 coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones.
 
 Right.  We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in 
 maintenance mode.  Is there some feature you require that is not available in 
 1.2.11 but is in some later version?  If not, then do you really need to 
 upgrade?
 
 Should I make the move to Fedora? 
 
 It depends.  Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead?  The only 
 problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet available, but 
 should be shortly.
 
 
 
 Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877
 
 
 
 --
 389 users mailing list
 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
 --
 389 users mailing list
 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Steven Stern
On 03/09/2015 04:16 PM, Mickey wrote:
 
 
 On 03/09/2015 05:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
 On 03/09/2015 04:14 PM, Mickey wrote:

 On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:
 Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply
 list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons?  Those buttons are
 important to the user when they wish to deal with the message.  Why
 would you want to remove them?  You can resize this area in order to
 help minimize it

 On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote:
 How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox
 messages and email content window ?

 How do you resize it ?
 If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window
 smaller.
 Install the extension Compact Headers.

 How do i do that ?

Tools - Add Ons - Get Add Ons  CompactHeaders or download from
http://compactheader.mozdev.org/



-- 
-- Steve
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Joe Zeff

On 03/09/2015 02:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote:

Install the extension Compact Headers.


Excellent!  Just what I wanted but never thought to ask about.  Thanx!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Noriko Hosoi

Hello,

On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
I'm in the same boat.  We, as an enterprise, have standardized on 
RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon.  Switching to either 
Fedora or CentOS isn't an option.  But the only official 389 release 
for RHEL6 is years old.


I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 
1.2.11.26.  But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6.  So, yes, 
there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us.  But 
really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out 
since then.  The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get 
our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade.
The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and 
newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6.


Sorry about missing the announcement.  Could it be possible to upgrade 
your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6?


Thanks.


Is compiling from source our only option?  Because, I can do that. 
 I'd just rather not have to.


On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com 
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:



On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The 
info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working 
either , maybe they are not valid anymore.


They are not, and have been removed.  It was just too difficult to 
maintain the copr repos.  The recommended versions are now the ones 
provided by your base operating system.

See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html

As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the 
product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones.


Right.  We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly 
in maintenance mode.  Is there some feature you require that is not 
available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version?  If not, then do 
you really need to upgrade?



Should I make the move to Fedora?


It depends.  Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead?  
The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not 
yet available, but should be shortly.





*Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877*



--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org 
mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users




--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Mickey



On 03/09/2015 05:28 PM, Steven Stern wrote:

On 03/09/2015 04:16 PM, Mickey wrote:


On 03/09/2015 05:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote:

On 03/09/2015 04:14 PM, Mickey wrote:

On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:

Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply
list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons?  Those buttons are
important to the user when they wish to deal with the message.  Why
would you want to remove them?  You can resize this area in order to
help minimize it

On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote:

How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox
messages and email content window ?


How do you resize it ?
If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window
smaller.

Install the extension Compact Headers.


How do i do that ?

Tools - Add Ons - Get Add Ons  CompactHeaders or download from
http://compactheader.mozdev.org/




Excellent !!! , Thanks very much.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?

2015-03-09 Thread Martin Cigorraga
Ah... couldn't tell, but the Gentoo wiki and Arch's one (in a lesser
extent), are excellent resources to learn everything about that!
HTH

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:36 PM, stan stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net wrote:

 On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:30:57 -0300
 Martin Cigorraga martincigorr...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hello Stan,
  Just a minor clarification: when compiling, the -j flag should point
  to a unit above your available cores in order to fully utilize all of
  them.
 
  I'm sure you already know this, but nevertheless beware when doing
  intensive compilation and using all your cores as you might end with a
  non-responding system until the compilation is done.

 Thanks.  Yes, I have read that, but haven't had any chance to
 experience it yet because of this issue.  :-)  In fact, I've read that
 it is good to ask for 50% more processes than the number of cores.
 --
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




-- 
-Martin
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Rich Megginson

On 03/09/2015 03:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:

Hello,

On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
I'm in the same boat.  We, as an enterprise, have standardized on 
RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon.  Switching to either 
Fedora or CentOS isn't an option.  But the only official 389 
release for RHEL6 is years old. 


It really depends on what you mean by release.  The 389-ds-base in 
RHEL6 gets regular updates.  It doesn't get many new features because we 
are trying to keep it stable.




I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 
1.2.11.26.  But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6.  So, yes, 
there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. 
 But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come 
out since then.  The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to 
get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade.
The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 
and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6.


Sorry about missing the announcement.  Could it be possible to upgrade 
your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6?


If you were using the old rmeggins repo or a copr repo, see 
http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html




Thanks.


Is compiling from source our only option?  Because, I can do that. 
 I'd just rather not have to.


On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com 
mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:



On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. 
The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not 
working either , maybe they are not valid anymore.


They are not, and have been removed.  It was just too difficult to 
maintain the copr repos.  The recommended versions are now the ones 
provided by your base operating system.

See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html

As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the 
product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones.


Right.  We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly 
in maintenance mode.  Is there some feature you require that is not 
available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version?  If not, then do 
you really need to upgrade?



Should I make the move to Fedora?


It depends.  Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead?  
The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not 
yet available, but should be shortly.





*Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877*



--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users




--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users




--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: Raid vs rsync -

2015-03-09 Thread Bob Goodwin



On 03/09/15 14:58, Chris Murphy wrote:

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:

I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard drive
into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the board and
intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However I have been
wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically rsync the drive
in use with a second drive?

That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make certain
that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss of data.

Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking?

Nope, definitely setup the rsync as backup before worrying about raid1
for improved uptime. Once the rsync is in place, should you wish to
ensure improved uptime for either your production system or the backup
itself, then consider raid1 in addition.

Rsync gives you incremental backup flexibility, and at least the
possibility of recovering not yet overwritten files. A common form of
data loss is user induced, e.g. accidentally deleting a file. With
raid1, that change happens immediately. With rsync, there's a delay.
So you actually have a real backup with rsync between two independent
file systems; whereas raid1 is really not backup, it's design goal is
improving uptime so you can keep working despite a device failure.
Another option is using rsync checksum verification, which is a ton
slower, but absolutely ensures source and destination are the same
independent of drives' ECC.




I'm primarily interested in the convenience of having my data on a 
server and preventing it's loss. I don't require extreme performance, 
etc. Reassured by your comments I will give this a try then.


Thank you,

Bob

--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?

2015-03-09 Thread stan
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:03:39 -0700
stan stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net wrote:

 This is from htop output.

Correction.  *atop* output.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: yum update problem with vlc

2015-03-09 Thread stan
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:27:39 -0600
jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote:

 So, how can I proceed with thish clash of dependencies?
 Should I completely uninstall vlc and forget about it?

The clash is because vlc requires an earlier version of a library than
the one you want to install.  The fix is to wait until rpmfusion
recompiles their binary to use the new library, which will probably
happen in a few days. You could open a bugzilla at rpmfusion bugzilla
asking for the update if it doesn't.

Alternatively, you can uninstall vlc, and update your system.  Then get
the src.rpm package from rpmfusion, and do an rpmbuild to build vlc
packages with the new library.  Then install them.

We get so spoiled by having continuous updates, that a few days seems
like an eternity.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Raid vs rsync -

2015-03-09 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:

 I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard drive
 into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the board and
 intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However I have been
 wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically rsync the drive
 in use with a second drive?

 That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make certain
 that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss of data.

 Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking?

Nope, definitely setup the rsync as backup before worrying about raid1
for improved uptime. Once the rsync is in place, should you wish to
ensure improved uptime for either your production system or the backup
itself, then consider raid1 in addition.

Rsync gives you incremental backup flexibility, and at least the
possibility of recovering not yet overwritten files. A common form of
data loss is user induced, e.g. accidentally deleting a file. With
raid1, that change happens immediately. With rsync, there's a delay.
So you actually have a real backup with rsync between two independent
file systems; whereas raid1 is really not backup, it's design goal is
improving uptime so you can keep working despite a device failure.
Another option is using rsync checksum verification, which is a ton
slower, but absolutely ensures source and destination are the same
independent of drives' ECC.

-- 
Chris Murphy
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?

2015-03-09 Thread Martin Cigorraga
Hello Stan,
Just a minor clarification: when compiling, the -j flag should point to a
unit above your available cores in order to fully utilize all of them.

I'm sure you already know this, but nevertheless beware when doing
intensive compilation and using all your cores as you might end with a
non-responding system until the compilation is done.

Regards,

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, stan stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net wrote:

 On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:03:39 -0700
 stan stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net wrote:

  This is from htop output.

 Correction.  *atop* output.
 --
 users mailing list
 users@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
 Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
 Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




-- 
-Martin
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?

2015-03-09 Thread stan
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:30:57 -0300
Martin Cigorraga martincigorr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello Stan,
 Just a minor clarification: when compiling, the -j flag should point
 to a unit above your available cores in order to fully utilize all of
 them.
 
 I'm sure you already know this, but nevertheless beware when doing
 intensive compilation and using all your cores as you might end with a
 non-responding system until the compilation is done.

Thanks.  Yes, I have read that, but haven't had any chance to
experience it yet because of this issue.  :-)  In fact, I've read that
it is good to ask for 50% more processes than the number of cores.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?

2015-03-09 Thread stan
I'm running Fedora 21 with a custom compiled kernel,
3.19.0-1.20150211.fc21.x86_64.

I have a multi core system with 6 cores.  All are recognized by the
kernel.  

But, when I run a compile job with -j6, in order to allow all six cores
to be used, it limits the total amount of usage to 100% of a *single*
core.  So, it might use all six cores, but the sum of the percentages
on those six cores is always around 100% of one core.  This is from
htop output.

On large compilations, like the kernel or firefox, even using 4 cores
could drastically reduce compile time.

I've looked at /etc/security/limits.conf, but it doesn't seem to have a
setting for this.  I've also looked at the /proc system to see if there
is a kernel variable, though that seems unlikely, with no luck.  Online
searching found ways to limit the amount that a single job can get, but
not how to set this for a user.  There must be a configuration variable
somewhere that is limiting the amount of total cpu a user can use.  But
I can't find it.

Can anyone help?
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


yum update problem with vlc

2015-03-09 Thread jd1008

Part of the output:
-- Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.18.5-201.fc21.x86_64 for 
package: kmod-vhba-3.18.5-201.fc21.x86_64-20140928-1.fc21.x86_64
--- Package kmod-vhba-3.18.5-201.fc21.x86_64.x86_64 0:20140928-1.fc21 
will be erased



--- Package vlc-core.x86_64 0:2.2.0-1.fc21 will be an update
-- Processing Dependency: libgpg-error.so.0(GPG_ERROR_1.0)(64bit) for 
package: vlc-core-2.2.0-1.fc21.x86_64

-- Running transaction check
--- Package vlc-core.x86_64 0:2.2.0-1.fc21 will be an update
-- Processing Dependency: libgpg-error.so.0(GPG_ERROR_1.0)(64bit) for 
package: vlc-core-2.2.0-1.fc21.x86_64

-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: vlc-core-2.2.0-1.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-updates)
   Requires: libgpg-error.so.0(GPG_ERROR_1.0)(64bit)
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest


$ rpm -qv --whatprovides /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0
libgpg-error-1.13-3.fc21.x86_64
$ rpm -qv --whatrequires libgpg-error.so.0
libgpg-error-1.13-3.fc21.i686
libgcrypt-1.6.1-7.fc21.i686
libxslt-1.1.28-8.fc21.i686
systemd-libs-216-20.fc21.i686


So, how can I proceed with thish clash of dependencies?
Should I completely uninstall vlc and forget about it?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Robert Viduya

 On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
 I'm in the same boat.  We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as 
 our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon.  Switching to either Fedora or 
 CentOS isn't an option.  But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is 
 years old.
 
 I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. 
  But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6.  So, yes, there's at least one 
 fix that we need that isn't available to us.  But really, there's tons of 
 bug fixes and features that have come out since then.  The longer we're held 
 back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new 
 features once we do upgrade.
 The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and 
 newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6.
 
 Sorry about missing the announcement.  Could it be possible to upgrade your 
 RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6?
 

Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 
1.2.11.15 release.  Is that detailed somewhere?  Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but 
I and my managers would want to know what’s changed.

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: Raid vs rsync -

2015-03-09 Thread Sam Varshavchik

Bob Goodwin writes:

I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard drive  
into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the board and  
intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However I have been  
wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically rsync the drive  
in use with a second drive?


That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make certain  
that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss of data.


Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking?


Raid, and rsyncing, are not equivalent to each other. They solve different  
problems.


For starters, in your case taking an existing partition and turning it into  
a RAID volume is going to be a big project. You'll have to back up your  
existing data somewhere, erase the existing partition, create a raid  
partition, then restore your data from backups. I'm not aware of a way to  
turn an existing non-RAID partition into a RAID one.


rsync is easier to set up when you have existing data, and I do have a few  
laptops where I have a daily job to rsync their data onto a different  
server.


On the other hand, RAID is generally faster, and runs in realtime. With  
rsync, you do have some window of vulnerability where you will lose  
everything since your last rsync run, when you have a failure, where RAID  
provides up to the second redundancy.


pgpX0y_O31Ugi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Doug

On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote:

Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply
list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons?  Those buttons are
important to the user when they wish to deal with the message.  Why
would you want to remove them?  You can resize this area in order to
help minimize it

On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote:

How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox
messages and email content window ?




I'm sorry that I forget how it's done, but I have pared the bar down to

From

Subject

To

I think I found the information by accessing Thunderbird help.
I agree that there is far too much stuff normally presented, using up 
valuable space.

--doug
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Joe Zeff

On 03/09/2015 03:41 PM, Doug wrote:



I'm sorry that I forget how it's done, but I have pared the bar down to

From

Subject

To


Go to View-Headers and select Normal instead of All.  HTH, HAND.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Rich Megginson

On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:

On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:


On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com 
mailto:nho...@redhat.com wrote:


Hello,

On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote:
I'm in the same boat.  We, as an enterprise, have standardized on 
RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon.  Switching to 
either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option.  But the only official 
389 release for RHEL6 is years old.


I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 
1.2.11.26.  But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6.  So, yes, 
there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. 
 But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come 
out since then.  The longer we're held back, the harder it will be 
to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do 
upgrade.
The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 
and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6.


Sorry about missing the announcement.  Could it be possible to 
upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6?




Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the 
base 1.2.11.15 release.  Is that detailed somewhere?  Yes, I can 
upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed.


As a RHEL customer, you have access to the portal, so you can go to 
https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/rhel---6/x86_64/168/389-ds-base/1.2.11.15-50.el6_6/x86_64/fd431d51/package 
and look at the changelog for the 389-ds-base package.  This has 
descriptions of the changes along with bugzilla bug number and 
sometimes 389 trac ticket numbers.


There's probably some way to get a list of all errata for the 
389-ds-base package in RHEL6, but I can't seem to find it.


Found it.  Unfortunately, it is not broken down by package.  But if you 
go to this page and search for 389-ds-base you can find them. The 
erratas have the full documentation, bug/enhancement descriptions, and 
package versions. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html


For example, here is the latest errata released on March 5, 2015: 
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0628.html








--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users




--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Ted Strother
Hi Robert,

Based on the changelog on our satellite server here are all the fixes
beyond the base 1.2.11.15

Change Log
* Tue Jan 20 2015 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-50
- Release 1.2.11.15-50
- Resolves: #1179099 - Problem with single value attribute MMR replication
(DS 47915, DS 569)

* Fri Jan 09 2015 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-49
- Release 1.2.11.15-49
- Resolves: #1180629 - CVE-2014-8105: information disclosure through
'cn=changelog' subtree
- Resolves: #1179099 - Problem with single value attribute MMR replication
(DS 47915)
- Resolves: #1179595 - default nsslapd-sasl-max-buffer-size should be 2MB
(DS 47457)
- Resolves: #1179100 - ACI's are replaced by ACI_ALL after editing goup
of ACI's including invalid one (DS 47953)

* Mon Oct 27 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-48
- Release 1.2.11.15-48
- Resolves: Bug #1157395 - ns-slapd segfault in libslapd.so.0.0.0 (DS 47889)

* Mon Sep 29 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-47
- Release 1.2.11.15-47
- Resolves: #1147479 - Memory leak during Reliab15 execution (6.6.z -
#47750)

* Fri Sep 12 2014 Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-46
- Release 1.2.11.15-46
- Resolves: #1138745 - Memory leak during Reliab15 execution

* Thu Sep 11 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-45
- Release 1.2.11.15-45
- Resolves: #1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0 ACIs
(#47885)

* Tue Sep 09 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-44
- Release 1.2.11.15-44
- Resolves: #1079098 - Simultaneous adding a user and binding as the user
could fail in the password policy check (DS 47748) - Simple bind hangs
after enabling password policy

* Fri Sep 05 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-43
- Release 1.2.11.15-43
- Resolves: #1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0 ACIs
(#47885)

* Thu Aug 21 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-42
- Release 1.2.11.15-42
- Resolves: #1129660 - Adding users to user group throws Internal server
error.

* Wed Aug 20 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-41
- Release 1.2.11.15-41
- Resolves: #1130252 - dirsrv not running with old openldap (DS 47875)

* Mon Aug 18 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-40
- Release 1.2.11.15-40
- Resolves: #1130252 - dirsrv not running with old openldap (DS 47875)
- Resolves: #1103287 - logconv.pl memory continually grows (DS 47446)
- Resolves: #1121596 - Deleting attribute present in
nsslapd-allowed-to-delete-attrs returns Operations error (DS 443)
- Resolves: #1109381 - winsync doesn't sync DN valued attributes if DS DN
value doesn't exist (DS 415)
- Resolves: #1128759 - Performance degradation with scope ONE after some
load (DS 47874)
- Resolves: #1127612 - Filter AND with only one clause should be optimized
(DS 47872)
- Resolves: #1014111 - repl-monitor fails to convert * to default values
(DS 47862)

* Tue Aug 05 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-39
- Release 1.2.11.15-39
- Resolves: #1123863
EMBARGOED CVE-2014-3562 - unauthenticated information disclosure (Bug
1123477)
- Resolves: #1123863
High contention on computed attribute lock (DS 616)
- Resolves: #1062763
single valued attribute replicated ADD does not work (DS 47692)
- Resolves: #1121596
Deleting attribute present in nsslapd-allowed-to-delete-attrs returns
Operations error (DS 443)
- Resolves: #1014111
Repl-monitor.pl ignores the provided connection parameters (DS 47862)
- Resolves: #1115281
New defects found in 389-ds-base-1.2.11 (DS 47863)
- Resolves: #1112729
paged results control is not working in some cases when we have a
subsuffix. (DS 47824)

* Tue Jul 01 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-38
- Release 1.2.11.15-38
- Resolves: bug 1080185 - revert - Creating a glue fails if one above level
is a conflict or missing (DS 47750;Patch233)

* Tue Jul 01 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-37
- Release 1.2.11.15-37
- Resolves: bug 1113606 - server restart wipes out index config if there is
a default index (DS 47831)
- Resolves: bug 1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0
ACIs (DS 47821)
- Resolves: bug 1080185 - Creating a glue fails if one above level is a
conflict or missing (DS 47750)

* Mon Jun 23 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-36
- Release 1.2.11.15-36
- Resolves: bug 1088171 - revert - 7-bit check plugin does not work for
userpassword attribute (DS 47423)

* Fri Jun 20 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-35
- Release 1.2.11.15-35
- Resolves: Bug 404 - 1.2.11 branch: coverity errors (DS 47820)

* Mon Jun 16 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-34
- Release 1.2.11.15-34
- Resolves: bug 1109952 - memory leak in ldapsearch filter objectclass=*
(DS 47780)
- Resolves: bug 1109443 - Server hangs in cos_cache when adding a user
entry (DS 47649)
- Resolves: bug 1109333 - 389 Server crashes if uniqueMember is invalid
syntax and memberOf plugin is enabled. (DS 47793)
- Resolves: bug 1109335 - Parent 

Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird

2015-03-09 Thread Doug

On 03/09/2015 06:53 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 03/09/2015 03:41 PM, Doug wrote:



I'm sorry that I forget how it's done, but I have pared the bar down to

From

Subject

To


Go to View-Headers and select Normal instead of All.  HTH, HAND.


Thanx, Joe. I had already implemented the other change, which brings the bar to 
two lines, but now that I have done so,
I find that shift-h will toggle between the two line compacted view and the 
three line view that I was using. This gives
maximum flexibility, I think. I can't see nay reason to have any more 
information there than this.

--doug
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


camera troubles

2015-03-09 Thread Amadeus WM
Ok, so I'm moving on from pidgin, to skype. 

I found how to install skype here:

http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2012/install-skype-on-fedora-centos-
red-hat-rhel-scientific-linux-sl/

It works. Except for my old Logitech QuickCam Messenger camera. But I 
found this excellent hack that shows how to get it to work:

http://community.linuxmint.com/tutorial/view/219

which basically says that skype expects the v4l1 libraries, not the 
default v4l2 so one needs to preload the v4l1compat.so library - the 32 
bit version, to match skype. 

For my 64-bit Fedora this would be:

#!/bin/bash
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l1compat.so /usr/bin/skype


So I did that, but I'm getting this error:

ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l1compat.so' from LD_PRELOAD 
cannot be preloaded (wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32): ignored.

Lo and behold though, the camera works despite that error. So for my 
peace of mind, can anybody explain what's going on? 


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Re: Fedora 21 server gnome install not starting

2015-03-09 Thread Morgan Read

  
  
Hi Pete - no criticism taken :)

I want to run a server because I want to serve things...  ftp, mail,
printer, media, backup, dhcp, samba, freeswitch, owncloud and much
much more...  Strange, but true

Still getting to the bottom of all this.  I followed Chris Murphy's
lead and this is what I now get from the list at http://ur1.ca/jvh4d
[root@frontserver ~]# systemctl is-enabled cups.path abrt-ccpp.service abrt-oops.service abrt-vmcore.service abrt-xorg.service abrtd.service accounts-daemon.service atd.service auditd.service avahi-daemon.service bluetooth.service chronyd.service crond.service cups.service dbus-org.bluez.service dbus-org.fedoraproject.FirewallD1.service dbus-org.freedesktop.Avahi.service dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service dbus-org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.service dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service display-manager.service dmraid-activation.service firewalld.service gdm.service getty@.service iscsi.service libvirtd.service lvm2-monitor.service mcelog.service mdmonitor.service ModemManager.service multipathd.service netcf-transaction.service NetworkManager-dispatcher.service NetworkManager.service rngd.service rsyslog.service rtkit-daemon.service smartd.service spice-vdagentd.service sshd.service syst
 emd-reada
head-collect.service systemd-readahead-drop.service systemd-readahead-replay.service vmtoolsd.service avahi-daemon.socket cups.socket dm-event.socket iscsid.socket iscsiuio.socket lvm2-lvmetad.socket rpcbind.socket default.target graphical.target nfs-client.target remote-fs.target dnf-makecache.timer
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
enabled
[root@frontserver ~]#

That was after installing
ModemManager-glib-devel-1.4.0-1.fc21.i686
spice-vdagent-0.15.0-3.fc21.i686
dnf-0.6.4-1.fc21.noarch

And enabling those plus
rpcbind.socket

But, still no boot into a graphical interface.

I've put the output /var/log/messages here:
https://app.box.com/s/kb0becxjig2wmnl0b6468v83a85nd4wy
Of interest perhaps are the following errors which seem to follow the point I'd expect gnome to kicking:
Mar  9 21:45:17 frontserver rngd: Error writing /dev/tpm0
Mar  9 21:45:17 frontserver kernel: tpm_tis 00:04: tpm_transmit: tpm_send: error -16
Mar  9 21:45:18 frontserver kernel: [  135.139069] tpm_tis 00:04: tpm_transmit: tpm_send: error -16

I'm beginning to wonder if bug report is needed...

thanks,
M.

-- 
  Morgan Read

  

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Raid vs rsync -

2015-03-09 Thread Bob Goodwin



On 03/09/15 20:23, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Bob Goodwin writes:

I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard 
drive into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced 
the board and intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. 
However I have been wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to 
periodically rsync the drive in use with a second drive?


That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make 
certain that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against 
loss of data.


Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking?


Raid, and rsyncing, are not equivalent to each other. They solve 
different problems.


For starters, in your case taking an existing partition and turning it 
into a RAID volume is going to be a big project. You'll have to back 
up your existing data somewhere, erase the existing partition, create 
a raid partition, then restore your data from backups. I'm not aware 
of a way to turn an existing non-RAID partition into a RAID one.
I had intended to set up the raid server first and then transfer data 
from the original drive, that seemed like it should would work?


And yes, I think rsync is really what I want anyway since I'm more 
interested in saving the data in two places to minimize the chance of 
losing everything with a failure of some kind. I realize there is a 
chance of losing some data depending on when the failure occurs relative 
to the last rsync and I'm willing to accept that. My files are important 
to me but not so critical that I need to cover every possibility.


rsync is easier to set up when you have existing data, and I do have a 
few laptops where I have a daily job to rsync their data onto a 
different server.
I have been using rsync to make copies of files between several 
computers for some time and it works without a hitch for me ...


On the other hand, RAID is generally faster, and runs in realtime. 
With rsync, you do have some window of vulnerability where you will 
lose everything since your last rsync run, when you have a failure, 
where RAID provides up to the second redundancy.


So it looks like that is a reasonable thing to try. I've set up the NFS 
server and will transfer some data into it tomorrow.


Thanks for the advice,

Bob

--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Problem booting Fedora 21

2015-03-09 Thread Daniel Jonsson
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:02:19PM +, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
 Have you tried hitting escape whilst waiting for the plymouth boot screen  
 (to view the current boot dialog)?
 This will allow you to at least see where the boot process is hanging.
 Regards
 Andy

First the GRUB screen is shown with 3 different kernel versions. When
selecting one of them, the text Ignoring BGRT: invalid status 0 (expected
1) is displayed for a brief moment. It then switches to the Plymouth
Fedora logo. If I hit escape during its process of filling up the Plymouth
Fedora logo, it shows the same error.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Problem booting Fedora 21

2015-03-09 Thread Daniel Jonsson
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:20:14AM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
 ack, sorry, I mis-read that... NFS not NTFS.. yes, disable NFS...

I only had one extra ext4 partition in my fstab file which I commented out.
However, it did not make any difference with regards to be able to boot up
successfully.

It would be nice if there was a way to see the log entries after a hard
reset during the boot process. Then I assume it would be trivial to locate
the problem.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

2015-03-09 Thread Juan Carlos Camargo
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info
on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe
they are not valid anymore. As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I
see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with
the older ones. Should I make the move to Fedora?


*Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877*
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users