Re: pidgin video chat
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 04:55 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: Does anyone know how to do video chat in pidgin? I can't figure it out for the life of me. I click on a contact name and the chat window opens. Then, under Conversation - Media I have 3 options: Audio call / Video call / Audio and video call. But all are inactive (grayed out) and so they can't be selected. I have wondered the same. I've come to the conclusion that only certain IM protocols can support it, but not knowing which ones. I have wondered if it were something that Pidgin could do, by itself, using some particular protocol, and only use one of the instant messenger messages to send the invite through. -- tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.18.7-100.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Wed Feb 11 21:16:53 UTC 2015 i686 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: pvcreate
On 03/08/2015 12:09 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Using fdisk I create a partition of 59Go (/dev/sdxy) Then I do a pvcreate /dev/sdxy) pvdisplay says: /dev/sdb7 is a new physical volume of 38.00 GiB This probably results from a previous partitioning. Maybe you just repartitioned and missed the fdisk message about the fact that the new partition table will be active at next reboot. It happens if some other partitions on the disk are in use. In that case 38GiB is the size of the old /dev/sdb7. Be careful. Use cat /proc/partitions to display how the disk is seen by the system in this moment. -- Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: pidgin video chat
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:54:05PM +1030, Tim wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 04:55 +, Amadeus W.M. wrote: Does anyone know how to do video chat in pidgin? I can't figure it out for the life of me. I click on a contact name and the chat window opens. Then, under Conversation - Media I have 3 options: Audio call / Video call / Audio and video call. But all are inactive (grayed out) and so they can't be selected. I have wondered the same. I've come to the conclusion that only certain IM protocols can support it, but not knowing which ones. I have wondered if it were something that Pidgin could do, by itself, using some particular protocol, and only use one of the instant messenger messages to send the invite through. I don't know about the other services, but the XMPP based google accounts used to work (a bit buggy though). But by the time libpurple managed to work out the bugs, Google started pushing hangouts for audio/video calls, and at some point they removed video calls over XMPP. Prsently I don't quite know if this works with other XMPP account providers like jabber. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [ F21 ] How to remove GNOME
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015, Suvayu Ali wrote: On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 06:32:22PM -0300, Martin Cigorraga wrote: I'm a newcomer to Fedora and still learning its ways so excuse me if my question sounds stupid. Now, I want to remove GNOME from my install as I use i3; from what I saw there's no gnome-group or similar goup available, how should I proceed? I don't know why no one else has mentioned this already. In my opinion it is much easier to install a minimal set, and then build your desktop as needed rather than install the default, and get rid of Gnome. I'm an XFCE user (with lightdm as login manager), and everytime I did a fresh install, I used the minimal image. You can even do a network install. During that I simply select the gui packages I need (some subset of XFCE for me). This way I have a very small set of gnome packages. $ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l 18 I know 18 is not a very accurate count, but it is more or less there. Since you are using i3, I bet you can get the list to be even shorter! Often people say disk space is cheap, why bother? I have a tiny 20 gig / on my laptop, so it does matter to me. On my desktop, I don't care. Hope this helps, Yeah, my answer to most of these how do I do this complex reconfiguration thing with a box I've dicking around with for two days and have all sorts fo stuff gumming up the works questions is usually reinstall. For me, anyway, it takes, what, 30 mins to reinstall Fedora insert spin here without the gunk I wish I hadn't added, but four or five hours chasing dependencies and stuff trying to clean a system that has a couple hundred packages installed I decided I didn't want. A clean install is the chicken soup of system administration, IMHO. billo -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote: I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult to maintain the copr repos. The recommended versions are now the ones provided by your base operating system. See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Right. We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in maintenance mode. Is there some feature you require that is not available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version? If not, then do you really need to upgrade? Should I make the move to Fedora? It depends. Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead? The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet available, but should be shortly. *Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877* -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: pvcreate
Hello, I guess that you are write. I forgot that point. I repartitioned again, I did not get the message and pvscan gave me the right size. The only active partition was probably a swap partition that I finally desactived. Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 at 5:03 PM From: Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: pvcreate On 03/08/2015 12:09 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, Using fdisk I create a partition of 59Go (/dev/sdxy) Then I do a pvcreate /dev/sdxy) pvdisplay says: /dev/sdb7 is a new physical volume of 38.00 GiB This probably results from a previous partitioning. Maybe you just repartitioned and missed the fdisk message about the fact that the new partition table will be active at next reboot. It happens if some other partitions on the disk are in use. In that case 38GiB is the size of the old /dev/sdb7. Be careful. Use cat /proc/partitions to display how the disk is seen by the system in this moment. -- Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [ F21 ] How to remove GNOME
On 08.03.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote: $ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l 18 FWIW: this is an installation from the XFCE spin, with additional devel and administration packages: [htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l 13 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Raid vs rsync -
I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard drive into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the board and intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However I have been wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically rsync the drive in use with a second drive? That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make certain that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss of data. Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking? Bob -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [ F21 ] How to remove GNOME
On 03/09/15 12:21, Heinz Diehl wrote: FWIW: this is an installation from the XFCE spin, with additional devel and administration packages: [htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l 13 Here's an XFCE Live spin I installed a few days ago with a few added applications: [bobg@bobgASRockServer ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l 9 Bob -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [ F21 ] How to remove GNOME
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:21:12PM +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 08.03.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote: $ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l 18 FWIW: this is an installation from the XFCE spin, with additional devel and administration packages: [htd@chiara ~]$ rpm -qa gnome\* | wc -l 13 I know mine could be a bit lower. I use some packages that kinda pull in a few gnome dependencies: evince, cheese, guake, mplayer gui, etc. There are also a few that do not show up in the above count like yelp. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 04:14 PM, Mickey wrote: On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons? Those buttons are important to the user when they wish to deal with the message. Why would you want to remove them? You can resize this area in order to help minimize it On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote: How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox messages and email content window ? How do you resize it ? If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window smaller. Install the extension Compact Headers. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons? Those buttons are important to the user when they wish to deal with the message. Why would you want to remove them? You can resize this area in order to help minimize it On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote: How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox messages and email content window ? How do you resize it ? If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window smaller. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Announcing 389 Admin Server 1.1.38
389 Admin Server 1.1.38 The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-admin version 1.1.38 and 389-adminutil version 1.1.21. Fedora packages are available from the EPEL7, Fedora 20, Fedora 21 and Rawhide repositories. The new packages and versions are: * 389-admin-1.1.38-1 * 389-adminutil-1.1.21-1 Source tarballs are available for download at Download Admin Source http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-admin-1.1.38.tar.bz2 and Download Adminutil Source http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-adminutil-1.1.21.tar.bz2. Highlights in 389-admin-1.1.38 and 389-adminutil-1.1.21 * Several bugs are fixed including security bugs – stop using DES and old SSL version. Installation and Upgrade See Download http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/download.html for information about setting up your yum repositories. To install, use *yum install 389-ds* yum install 389-ds After install completes, run *setup-ds-admin.pl* to set up your directory server. setup-ds-admin.pl To upgrade, use *yum upgrade* yum upgrade After upgrade completes, run *setup-ds-admin.pl -u* to update your directory server/admin server/console information. setup-ds-admin.pl -u See Install_Guide http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/legacy/install-guide.html for more information about the initial installation, setup, and upgrade See Source http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/development/source.html for information about source tarballs and SCM (git) access. Feedback We are very interested in your feedback! Please provide feedback and comments to the 389-users mailing list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users and following pages: * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.el7 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc21 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-2.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-2.el7 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-1.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-1.fc20 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-1.fc21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-adminutil-1.1.21-1.fc21 If you find a bug, or would like to see a new feature, file it in our Trac instance: https://fedorahosted.org/389 Detailed Changelog since 389-admin-1.1.35 * Ticket 48024 - repl-monitor invoked from adminserver cgi fails * Ticket 47995 - Admin Server: source code cleaning * Ticket 47891 - Admin Server reconfig breaks SSL config * Ticket 47929 - Admin Server - disable SSLv3 by default * Ticket 201 - nCipher HSM cannot be configured via the console * Ticket 47493 - Configuration Tab does not work with FIPS mode enabled * Ticket 47697 - Resource leak in lib/libdsa/dsalib_updown.c * Ticket 47860 - register-ds-admin.pl problem when following steps to replicate o=netscaperoot * Ticket 47548 - register-ds-admin does not register into remote config ds * Ticket 47893 - Admin Server should use Sys::Hostname instead Net::Domain * Ticket 47891 - Admin Server reconfig breaks SSL config * Ticket 47300 - Update man page for remove-ds-admin.pl * Ticket 47850 - “nsslapd-allow-anonymous-access: rootdse” makes login as “admin” fail at the first time * Ticket 47497 - Admin Express - remove “Security Level” * Ticket 47495 - admin express: wrong instance creation time * Ticket 47665 - Create new instance results in setting wrong ACI for the “cn=config” entry * Ticket 47478 - No groups file? error restarting Admin server * Ticket 47300 - [RFE] remove-ds-admin.pl: redesign the behaviour * Ticket 434 - admin-serv logs filling with “admserv_host_ip_check: ap_get_remote_host could not resolve “ * Ticket 47563 - cannot restart directory server from console * Ticket 222 - Admin Express issues “Internal Server Error” when the Config DS is down. * Ticket 418 - Error with register-ds-admin.pl * Ticket 377 - Unchecked use of SELinux command Reviewed by: rmeggins * Ticket 47498 - Error Message for Failed to create the configuration directory server Detailed Changelog since 389-adminutil-1.1.19 * Ticket 47929 - adminutil - future proof getSSLVersion * Ticket 47929 - Adminutil - do not use SSL3 by default * Ticket 47850 - “nsslapd-allow-anonymous-access: rootdse” makes login as “admin” fail at the first time * Ticket 47881 - crash during debug session in adminutil * Ticket 47680 - Upgraded 389-admin rpms and now I can’t start dirsrv-admin http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/release-admin-1-1-38.html -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 05:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:14 PM, Mickey wrote: On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons? Those buttons are important to the user when they wish to deal with the message. Why would you want to remove them? You can resize this area in order to help minimize it On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote: How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox messages and email content window ? How do you resize it ? If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window smaller. Install the extension Compact Headers. How do i do that ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox messages and email content window ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons? Those buttons are important to the user when they wish to deal with the message. Why would you want to remove them? You can resize this area in order to help minimize it On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote: How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox messages and email content window ? -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Announcing 389 Console 1.1.9
389 Console 1.1.9 The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-console version 1.1.9, 389-ds-console version 1.2.10, 389-admin-console version 1.1.10, and idm-console-framework version 1.1.9. Fedora packages are available from the EPEL7, Fedora 20, Fedora 21 and Rawhide repositories. The new packages and versions are: * 389-console-1.1.9-1 * 389-ds-console-1.2.10-1 * 389-admin-console-1.1.10-1 * idm-console-framework-1.1.9-1 Source tarballs are available for download at Download 389 Console Source http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-console-1.1.9.tar.bz2, Download 389 Ds Console Source http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-ds-console-1.2.10.tar.bz2, Download 389 Admin Console Source http://www.port389.org/binaries/389-admin-console-1.1.10.tar.bz2 and Download Idm Console Framework Source http://www.port389.org/binaries/idm-console-framework-1.1.9.tar.bz2. Highlights in 389-console-1.1.9, 389-ds-console-1.2.10, 389-admin-console-1.1.10 and idm-console-framework-1.1.9-1 * Several bugs are fixed including security bugs – enable TLS version 1.1 and newer; stop using old SSL version. Installation and Upgrade See Download http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/download.html for information about setting up your yum repositories. To install, use *yum install 389-ds* yum install 389-ds After install completes, run *setup-ds-admin.pl* to set up your directory server. setup-ds-admin.pl To upgrade, use *yum upgrade* yum upgrade After upgrade completes, run *setup-ds-admin.pl -u* to update your directory server/admin server/console information. setup-ds-admin.pl -u See Install_Guide http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/legacy/install-guide.html for more information about the initial installation, setup, and upgrade See Source http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/development/source.html for information about source tarballs and SCM (git) access. Feedback We are very interested in your feedback! Please provide feedback and comments to the 389-users mailing list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users and following pages: * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.el7 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.fc20 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.fc21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-console-1.1.9-1.fc21 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.el7 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.fc20 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.fc21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-console-1.2.10-1.fc21 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.el7 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.fc20 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.fc21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.fc21 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-2.el7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-2.el7 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-2.fc20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-2.fc20 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-1.fc21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/idm-console-framework-1.1.9-1.fc21 If you find a bug, or would like to see a new feature, file it in our Trac instance: https://fedorahosted.org/389 Detailed Changelog since 389-console-1.1.7 * Ticket 47604 - 389-console: remove versioned jars from %{_javadir} * Ticket 97 - 389-console should provide man page Detailed Changelog since 389-ds-console-1.2.7 * Bug 1022104 - Remove versioned jarfiles from _javadir (idm-console-framework) * Ticket 47994 - DS Console always sets nsSSL3 to “on” when a securty setting is adjusted * Ticket 47380 - RFE: Winsync loses connection with AD objects when they move from the console. * Ticket 135 - DS console - right clicking an object does not select that object * Ticket 47887 - DS Console does not correctly disable SSL * Ticket 47485 - DS instance cannot be restored from remote console * Ticket 47886 - DS Console - mouse wheel speed very slow * Ticket 176 - DS Console should timeout when mismatched port and protocol combination is chosen * Ticket 47883 - DS Console - java exception when refreshing schema * Ticket 96 - Window too large for Manage
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. Is compiling from source our only option? Because, I can do that. I'd just rather not have to. On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote: I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult to maintain the copr repos. The recommended versions are now the ones provided by your base operating system. See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Right. We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in maintenance mode. Is there some feature you require that is not available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version? If not, then do you really need to upgrade? Should I make the move to Fedora? It depends. Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead? The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet available, but should be shortly. Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877 -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 04:16 PM, Mickey wrote: On 03/09/2015 05:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:14 PM, Mickey wrote: On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons? Those buttons are important to the user when they wish to deal with the message. Why would you want to remove them? You can resize this area in order to help minimize it On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote: How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox messages and email content window ? How do you resize it ? If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window smaller. Install the extension Compact Headers. How do i do that ? Tools - Add Ons - Get Add Ons CompactHeaders or download from http://compactheader.mozdev.org/ -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 02:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote: Install the extension Compact Headers. Excellent! Just what I wanted but never thought to ask about. Thanx! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Thanks. Is compiling from source our only option? Because, I can do that. I'd just rather not have to. On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote: I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult to maintain the copr repos. The recommended versions are now the ones provided by your base operating system. See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Right. We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in maintenance mode. Is there some feature you require that is not available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version? If not, then do you really need to upgrade? Should I make the move to Fedora? It depends. Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead? The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet available, but should be shortly. *Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877* -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 05:28 PM, Steven Stern wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:16 PM, Mickey wrote: On 03/09/2015 05:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:14 PM, Mickey wrote: On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons? Those buttons are important to the user when they wish to deal with the message. Why would you want to remove them? You can resize this area in order to help minimize it On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote: How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox messages and email content window ? How do you resize it ? If I grab it at top and drag it down it makes my message content window smaller. Install the extension Compact Headers. How do i do that ? Tools - Add Ons - Get Add Ons CompactHeaders or download from http://compactheader.mozdev.org/ Excellent !!! , Thanks very much. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?
Ah... couldn't tell, but the Gentoo wiki and Arch's one (in a lesser extent), are excellent resources to learn everything about that! HTH On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:36 PM, stan stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net wrote: On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:30:57 -0300 Martin Cigorraga martincigorr...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Stan, Just a minor clarification: when compiling, the -j flag should point to a unit above your available cores in order to fully utilize all of them. I'm sure you already know this, but nevertheless beware when doing intensive compilation and using all your cores as you might end with a non-responding system until the compilation is done. Thanks. Yes, I have read that, but haven't had any chance to experience it yet because of this issue. :-) In fact, I've read that it is good to ask for 50% more processes than the number of cores. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- -Martin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
On 03/09/2015 03:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. It really depends on what you mean by release. The 389-ds-base in RHEL6 gets regular updates. It doesn't get many new features because we are trying to keep it stable. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? If you were using the old rmeggins repo or a copr repo, see http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html Thanks. Is compiling from source our only option? Because, I can do that. I'd just rather not have to. On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/09/2015 12:39 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote: I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. They are not, and have been removed. It was just too difficult to maintain the copr repos. The recommended versions are now the ones provided by your base operating system. See also http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Right. We are trying to keep EL6 versions stable - they are mostly in maintenance mode. Is there some feature you require that is not available in 1.2.11 but is in some later version? If not, then do you really need to upgrade? Should I make the move to Fedora? It depends. Have you considered upgrading to CentOS 7.x instead? The only problem is that the admin server and console bits are not yet available, but should be shortly. *Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877* -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Raid vs rsync -
On 03/09/15 14:58, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote: I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard drive into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the board and intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However I have been wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically rsync the drive in use with a second drive? That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make certain that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss of data. Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking? Nope, definitely setup the rsync as backup before worrying about raid1 for improved uptime. Once the rsync is in place, should you wish to ensure improved uptime for either your production system or the backup itself, then consider raid1 in addition. Rsync gives you incremental backup flexibility, and at least the possibility of recovering not yet overwritten files. A common form of data loss is user induced, e.g. accidentally deleting a file. With raid1, that change happens immediately. With rsync, there's a delay. So you actually have a real backup with rsync between two independent file systems; whereas raid1 is really not backup, it's design goal is improving uptime so you can keep working despite a device failure. Another option is using rsync checksum verification, which is a ton slower, but absolutely ensures source and destination are the same independent of drives' ECC. I'm primarily interested in the convenience of having my data on a server and preventing it's loss. I don't require extreme performance, etc. Reassured by your comments I will give this a try then. Thank you, Bob -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:03:39 -0700 stan stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net wrote: This is from htop output. Correction. *atop* output. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: yum update problem with vlc
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:27:39 -0600 jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote: So, how can I proceed with thish clash of dependencies? Should I completely uninstall vlc and forget about it? The clash is because vlc requires an earlier version of a library than the one you want to install. The fix is to wait until rpmfusion recompiles their binary to use the new library, which will probably happen in a few days. You could open a bugzilla at rpmfusion bugzilla asking for the update if it doesn't. Alternatively, you can uninstall vlc, and update your system. Then get the src.rpm package from rpmfusion, and do an rpmbuild to build vlc packages with the new library. Then install them. We get so spoiled by having continuous updates, that a few days seems like an eternity. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid vs rsync -
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote: I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard drive into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the board and intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However I have been wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically rsync the drive in use with a second drive? That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make certain that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss of data. Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking? Nope, definitely setup the rsync as backup before worrying about raid1 for improved uptime. Once the rsync is in place, should you wish to ensure improved uptime for either your production system or the backup itself, then consider raid1 in addition. Rsync gives you incremental backup flexibility, and at least the possibility of recovering not yet overwritten files. A common form of data loss is user induced, e.g. accidentally deleting a file. With raid1, that change happens immediately. With rsync, there's a delay. So you actually have a real backup with rsync between two independent file systems; whereas raid1 is really not backup, it's design goal is improving uptime so you can keep working despite a device failure. Another option is using rsync checksum verification, which is a ton slower, but absolutely ensures source and destination are the same independent of drives' ECC. -- Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?
Hello Stan, Just a minor clarification: when compiling, the -j flag should point to a unit above your available cores in order to fully utilize all of them. I'm sure you already know this, but nevertheless beware when doing intensive compilation and using all your cores as you might end with a non-responding system until the compilation is done. Regards, On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, stan stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net wrote: On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:03:39 -0700 stan stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net wrote: This is from htop output. Correction. *atop* output. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- -Martin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:30:57 -0300 Martin Cigorraga martincigorr...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Stan, Just a minor clarification: when compiling, the -j flag should point to a unit above your available cores in order to fully utilize all of them. I'm sure you already know this, but nevertheless beware when doing intensive compilation and using all your cores as you might end with a non-responding system until the compilation is done. Thanks. Yes, I have read that, but haven't had any chance to experience it yet because of this issue. :-) In fact, I've read that it is good to ask for 50% more processes than the number of cores. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
How to increase maximum user cpu usage allowed on a multi core system?
I'm running Fedora 21 with a custom compiled kernel, 3.19.0-1.20150211.fc21.x86_64. I have a multi core system with 6 cores. All are recognized by the kernel. But, when I run a compile job with -j6, in order to allow all six cores to be used, it limits the total amount of usage to 100% of a *single* core. So, it might use all six cores, but the sum of the percentages on those six cores is always around 100% of one core. This is from htop output. On large compilations, like the kernel or firefox, even using 4 cores could drastically reduce compile time. I've looked at /etc/security/limits.conf, but it doesn't seem to have a setting for this. I've also looked at the /proc system to see if there is a kernel variable, though that seems unlikely, with no luck. Online searching found ways to limit the amount that a single job can get, but not how to set this for a user. There must be a configuration variable somewhere that is limiting the amount of total cpu a user can use. But I can't find it. Can anyone help? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
yum update problem with vlc
Part of the output: -- Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.18.5-201.fc21.x86_64 for package: kmod-vhba-3.18.5-201.fc21.x86_64-20140928-1.fc21.x86_64 --- Package kmod-vhba-3.18.5-201.fc21.x86_64.x86_64 0:20140928-1.fc21 will be erased --- Package vlc-core.x86_64 0:2.2.0-1.fc21 will be an update -- Processing Dependency: libgpg-error.so.0(GPG_ERROR_1.0)(64bit) for package: vlc-core-2.2.0-1.fc21.x86_64 -- Running transaction check --- Package vlc-core.x86_64 0:2.2.0-1.fc21 will be an update -- Processing Dependency: libgpg-error.so.0(GPG_ERROR_1.0)(64bit) for package: vlc-core-2.2.0-1.fc21.x86_64 -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: vlc-core-2.2.0-1.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: libgpg-error.so.0(GPG_ERROR_1.0)(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest $ rpm -qv --whatprovides /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0 libgpg-error-1.13-3.fc21.x86_64 $ rpm -qv --whatrequires libgpg-error.so.0 libgpg-error-1.13-3.fc21.i686 libgcrypt-1.6.1-7.fc21.i686 libxslt-1.1.28-8.fc21.i686 systemd-libs-216-20.fc21.i686 So, how can I proceed with thish clash of dependencies? Should I completely uninstall vlc and forget about it? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere? Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed. -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Raid vs rsync -
Bob Goodwin writes: I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard drive into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the board and intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However I have been wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically rsync the drive in use with a second drive? That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make certain that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss of data. Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking? Raid, and rsyncing, are not equivalent to each other. They solve different problems. For starters, in your case taking an existing partition and turning it into a RAID volume is going to be a big project. You'll have to back up your existing data somewhere, erase the existing partition, create a raid partition, then restore your data from backups. I'm not aware of a way to turn an existing non-RAID partition into a RAID one. rsync is easier to set up when you have existing data, and I do have a few laptops where I have a daily job to rsync their data onto a different server. On the other hand, RAID is generally faster, and runs in realtime. With rsync, you do have some window of vulnerability where you will lose everything since your last rsync run, when you have a failure, where RAID provides up to the second redundancy. pgpX0y_O31Ugi.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 05:06 PM, Kevin Cummings wrote: Do you mean the message header display which contains the reply, reply list, forward, archive, junk, and delete buttons? Those buttons are important to the user when they wish to deal with the message. Why would you want to remove them? You can resize this area in order to help minimize it On 03/09/2015 04:45 PM, Mickey wrote: How does one remove the Grayish information bar in between Inbox messages and email content window ? I'm sorry that I forget how it's done, but I have pared the bar down to From Subject To I think I found the information by accessing Thunderbird help. I agree that there is far too much stuff normally presented, using up valuable space. --doug -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 03:41 PM, Doug wrote: I'm sorry that I forget how it's done, but I have pared the bar down to From Subject To Go to View-Headers and select Normal instead of All. HTH, HAND. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
On 03/09/2015 05:54 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 03/09/2015 04:44 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com mailto:nho...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or CentOS isn't an option. But the only official 389 release for RHEL6 is years old. I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new features once we do upgrade. The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere? Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed. As a RHEL customer, you have access to the portal, so you can go to https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/rhel---6/x86_64/168/389-ds-base/1.2.11.15-50.el6_6/x86_64/fd431d51/package and look at the changelog for the 389-ds-base package. This has descriptions of the changes along with bugzilla bug number and sometimes 389 trac ticket numbers. There's probably some way to get a list of all errata for the 389-ds-base package in RHEL6, but I can't seem to find it. Found it. Unfortunately, it is not broken down by package. But if you go to this page and search for 389-ds-base you can find them. The erratas have the full documentation, bug/enhancement descriptions, and package versions. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html For example, here is the latest errata released on March 5, 2015: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0628.html -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
Hi Robert, Based on the changelog on our satellite server here are all the fixes beyond the base 1.2.11.15 Change Log * Tue Jan 20 2015 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-50 - Release 1.2.11.15-50 - Resolves: #1179099 - Problem with single value attribute MMR replication (DS 47915, DS 569) * Fri Jan 09 2015 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-49 - Release 1.2.11.15-49 - Resolves: #1180629 - CVE-2014-8105: information disclosure through 'cn=changelog' subtree - Resolves: #1179099 - Problem with single value attribute MMR replication (DS 47915) - Resolves: #1179595 - default nsslapd-sasl-max-buffer-size should be 2MB (DS 47457) - Resolves: #1179100 - ACI's are replaced by ACI_ALL after editing goup of ACI's including invalid one (DS 47953) * Mon Oct 27 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-48 - Release 1.2.11.15-48 - Resolves: Bug #1157395 - ns-slapd segfault in libslapd.so.0.0.0 (DS 47889) * Mon Sep 29 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-47 - Release 1.2.11.15-47 - Resolves: #1147479 - Memory leak during Reliab15 execution (6.6.z - #47750) * Fri Sep 12 2014 Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-46 - Release 1.2.11.15-46 - Resolves: #1138745 - Memory leak during Reliab15 execution * Thu Sep 11 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-45 - Release 1.2.11.15-45 - Resolves: #1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0 ACIs (#47885) * Tue Sep 09 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-44 - Release 1.2.11.15-44 - Resolves: #1079098 - Simultaneous adding a user and binding as the user could fail in the password policy check (DS 47748) - Simple bind hangs after enabling password policy * Fri Sep 05 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-43 - Release 1.2.11.15-43 - Resolves: #1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0 ACIs (#47885) * Thu Aug 21 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-42 - Release 1.2.11.15-42 - Resolves: #1129660 - Adding users to user group throws Internal server error. * Wed Aug 20 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-41 - Release 1.2.11.15-41 - Resolves: #1130252 - dirsrv not running with old openldap (DS 47875) * Mon Aug 18 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-40 - Release 1.2.11.15-40 - Resolves: #1130252 - dirsrv not running with old openldap (DS 47875) - Resolves: #1103287 - logconv.pl memory continually grows (DS 47446) - Resolves: #1121596 - Deleting attribute present in nsslapd-allowed-to-delete-attrs returns Operations error (DS 443) - Resolves: #1109381 - winsync doesn't sync DN valued attributes if DS DN value doesn't exist (DS 415) - Resolves: #1128759 - Performance degradation with scope ONE after some load (DS 47874) - Resolves: #1127612 - Filter AND with only one clause should be optimized (DS 47872) - Resolves: #1014111 - repl-monitor fails to convert * to default values (DS 47862) * Tue Aug 05 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-39 - Release 1.2.11.15-39 - Resolves: #1123863 EMBARGOED CVE-2014-3562 - unauthenticated information disclosure (Bug 1123477) - Resolves: #1123863 High contention on computed attribute lock (DS 616) - Resolves: #1062763 single valued attribute replicated ADD does not work (DS 47692) - Resolves: #1121596 Deleting attribute present in nsslapd-allowed-to-delete-attrs returns Operations error (DS 443) - Resolves: #1014111 Repl-monitor.pl ignores the provided connection parameters (DS 47862) - Resolves: #1115281 New defects found in 389-ds-base-1.2.11 (DS 47863) - Resolves: #1112729 paged results control is not working in some cases when we have a subsuffix. (DS 47824) * Tue Jul 01 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-38 - Release 1.2.11.15-38 - Resolves: bug 1080185 - revert - Creating a glue fails if one above level is a conflict or missing (DS 47750;Patch233) * Tue Jul 01 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-37 - Release 1.2.11.15-37 - Resolves: bug 1113606 - server restart wipes out index config if there is a default index (DS 47831) - Resolves: bug 1112702 - Broken dereference control with the FreeIPA 4.0 ACIs (DS 47821) - Resolves: bug 1080185 - Creating a glue fails if one above level is a conflict or missing (DS 47750) * Mon Jun 23 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-36 - Release 1.2.11.15-36 - Resolves: bug 1088171 - revert - 7-bit check plugin does not work for userpassword attribute (DS 47423) * Fri Jun 20 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-35 - Release 1.2.11.15-35 - Resolves: Bug 404 - 1.2.11 branch: coverity errors (DS 47820) * Mon Jun 16 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.15-34 - Release 1.2.11.15-34 - Resolves: bug 1109952 - memory leak in ldapsearch filter objectclass=* (DS 47780) - Resolves: bug 1109443 - Server hangs in cos_cache when adding a user entry (DS 47649) - Resolves: bug 1109333 - 389 Server crashes if uniqueMember is invalid syntax and memberOf plugin is enabled. (DS 47793) - Resolves: bug 1109335 - Parent
Re: Remove center information Bar in Thunderbird
On 03/09/2015 06:53 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 03/09/2015 03:41 PM, Doug wrote: I'm sorry that I forget how it's done, but I have pared the bar down to From Subject To Go to View-Headers and select Normal instead of All. HTH, HAND. Thanx, Joe. I had already implemented the other change, which brings the bar to two lines, but now that I have done so, I find that shift-h will toggle between the two line compacted view and the three line view that I was using. This gives maximum flexibility, I think. I can't see nay reason to have any more information there than this. --doug -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
camera troubles
Ok, so I'm moving on from pidgin, to skype. I found how to install skype here: http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2012/install-skype-on-fedora-centos- red-hat-rhel-scientific-linux-sl/ It works. Except for my old Logitech QuickCam Messenger camera. But I found this excellent hack that shows how to get it to work: http://community.linuxmint.com/tutorial/view/219 which basically says that skype expects the v4l1 libraries, not the default v4l2 so one needs to preload the v4l1compat.so library - the 32 bit version, to match skype. For my 64-bit Fedora this would be: #!/bin/bash LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l1compat.so /usr/bin/skype So I did that, but I'm getting this error: ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libv4l/v4l1compat.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32): ignored. Lo and behold though, the camera works despite that error. So for my peace of mind, can anybody explain what's going on? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Re: Fedora 21 server gnome install not starting
Hi Pete - no criticism taken :) I want to run a server because I want to serve things... ftp, mail, printer, media, backup, dhcp, samba, freeswitch, owncloud and much much more... Strange, but true Still getting to the bottom of all this. I followed Chris Murphy's lead and this is what I now get from the list at http://ur1.ca/jvh4d [root@frontserver ~]# systemctl is-enabled cups.path abrt-ccpp.service abrt-oops.service abrt-vmcore.service abrt-xorg.service abrtd.service accounts-daemon.service atd.service auditd.service avahi-daemon.service bluetooth.service chronyd.service crond.service cups.service dbus-org.bluez.service dbus-org.fedoraproject.FirewallD1.service dbus-org.freedesktop.Avahi.service dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service dbus-org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.service dbus-org.freedesktop.nm-dispatcher.service display-manager.service dmraid-activation.service firewalld.service gdm.service getty@.service iscsi.service libvirtd.service lvm2-monitor.service mcelog.service mdmonitor.service ModemManager.service multipathd.service netcf-transaction.service NetworkManager-dispatcher.service NetworkManager.service rngd.service rsyslog.service rtkit-daemon.service smartd.service spice-vdagentd.service sshd.service syst emd-reada head-collect.service systemd-readahead-drop.service systemd-readahead-replay.service vmtoolsd.service avahi-daemon.socket cups.socket dm-event.socket iscsid.socket iscsiuio.socket lvm2-lvmetad.socket rpcbind.socket default.target graphical.target nfs-client.target remote-fs.target dnf-makecache.timer enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled enabled [root@frontserver ~]# That was after installing ModemManager-glib-devel-1.4.0-1.fc21.i686 spice-vdagent-0.15.0-3.fc21.i686 dnf-0.6.4-1.fc21.noarch And enabling those plus rpcbind.socket But, still no boot into a graphical interface. I've put the output /var/log/messages here: https://app.box.com/s/kb0becxjig2wmnl0b6468v83a85nd4wy Of interest perhaps are the following errors which seem to follow the point I'd expect gnome to kicking: Mar 9 21:45:17 frontserver rngd: Error writing /dev/tpm0 Mar 9 21:45:17 frontserver kernel: tpm_tis 00:04: tpm_transmit: tpm_send: error -16 Mar 9 21:45:18 frontserver kernel: [ 135.139069] tpm_tis 00:04: tpm_transmit: tpm_send: error -16 I'm beginning to wonder if bug report is needed... thanks, M. -- Morgan Read -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid vs rsync -
On 03/09/15 20:23, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Bob Goodwin writes: I had a mainboard fail in a box I use as a server, I moved the hard drive into old computer and carried on from there. Now I've replaced the board and intended to set it up using Raid to mirror two drives. However I have been wondering if it wouldn't work just as well to periodically rsync the drive in use with a second drive? That seems a more direct approach and I could easily check to make certain that the second drive was a usable copy, insurance against loss of data. Am I going wrong somewhere in my thinking? Raid, and rsyncing, are not equivalent to each other. They solve different problems. For starters, in your case taking an existing partition and turning it into a RAID volume is going to be a big project. You'll have to back up your existing data somewhere, erase the existing partition, create a raid partition, then restore your data from backups. I'm not aware of a way to turn an existing non-RAID partition into a RAID one. I had intended to set up the raid server first and then transfer data from the original drive, that seemed like it should would work? And yes, I think rsync is really what I want anyway since I'm more interested in saving the data in two places to minimize the chance of losing everything with a failure of some kind. I realize there is a chance of losing some data depending on when the failure occurs relative to the last rsync and I'm willing to accept that. My files are important to me but not so critical that I need to cover every possibility. rsync is easier to set up when you have existing data, and I do have a few laptops where I have a daily job to rsync their data onto a different server. I have been using rsync to make copies of files between several computers for some time and it works without a hitch for me ... On the other hand, RAID is generally faster, and runs in realtime. With rsync, you do have some window of vulnerability where you will lose everything since your last rsync run, when you have a failure, where RAID provides up to the second redundancy. So it looks like that is a reasonable thing to try. I've set up the NFS server and will transfer some data into it tomorrow. Thanks for the advice, Bob -- http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem booting Fedora 21
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:02:19PM +, Andrew R Paterson wrote: Have you tried hitting escape whilst waiting for the plymouth boot screen (to view the current boot dialog)? This will allow you to at least see where the boot process is hanging. Regards Andy First the GRUB screen is shown with 3 different kernel versions. When selecting one of them, the text Ignoring BGRT: invalid status 0 (expected 1) is displayed for a brief moment. It then switches to the Plymouth Fedora logo. If I hit escape during its process of filling up the Plymouth Fedora logo, it shows the same error. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problem booting Fedora 21
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:20:14AM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote: ack, sorry, I mis-read that... NFS not NTFS.. yes, disable NFS... I only had one extra ext4 partition in my fstab file which I commented out. However, it did not make any difference with regards to be able to boot up successfully. It would be nice if there was a way to see the log entries after a hard reset during the boot process. Then I assume it would be trivial to locate the problem. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html
I'd like to see an updated install/upgrade procedure for 389-ds. The info on the web page is outdated, links for coprs are not working either , maybe they are not valid anymore. As a user of Centos6x I'm somehow lost when I see versions of the product coming out whereas my servers are stuck with the older ones. Should I make the move to Fedora? *Tfn: 957-211157 / 650932877* -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users