Re: [389-users] selinux problem with centos 7.1
On 04/17/2015 08:19 AM, Angel Bosch wrote: I went through this with Mageia. You either need to enable selinux (permissive) or compile 389-ds without selinux. do you mean I won't be able to execute it without selinux? or is just the installer? Please file a ticket - https://fedorahosted.org/389/newticket abosch -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
[389-users] selinux problem with centos 7.1
hi,
I'm having problems installing a new test environment on centos 7.1
when I execute setup-ds-admin.pl i get this message:
Adding port 389 to selinux policy failed - ValueError: SELinux policy is
not managed or store cannot be accessed.
I've tried with --debug and it keeps retrying every 5 seconds with same message.
# lsb_release -a
LSB Version::core-4.1-amd64:core-4.1-noarch
Distributor ID: CentOS
Description:CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core)
Release:7.1.1503
Codename: Core
# sestatus
SELinux status: disabled
the only irregular thing is that im using an openvz container, but I have
plenty of other DS inside openvz without any problems.
i managed to continue with the installation with a very dirty hack, I modified
DSCreate.pm script and added a return in the beggining of updateSelinuxPolicy
sub:
sub updateSelinuxPolicy {
my $inf = shift;
return 0;
did anyone got this same problem?
abosch
--
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: TeX hyphenation
2015-04-16 0:26 GMT+02:00, Aradenatorix Veckhom Vacelaevus arad...@gmail.com:
Well this question seems to be off tiopic in Fedora, but you could ask
it in a better place such as http://tex.stackexchange.com/.
It shouldn't be off topic, because, as far as I can see, it is
Fedora's changes to texlive that cause this problem. (I don't doubt
that there are good reasons for those changes, but still, this is
specific to Fedora.)
Meanwhile
you must to know that you can use the packages babel either
polyglossia for hyphenate in another languages different from English.
Thanks for the suggestion, but this requires xelatex. (I don't know
how much of a problem that is; maybe it's a drop in replacement for
standard latex.)
And of course, you need to install all the packages needed for that. I
don't know how is in Fedora, but in Debian and derivations usually you
have a texlive-base minimal working installation that could be enough
for the most common uses, but if don't then you could add another sets
with more packages, although install texlive-full.
Even so, usually the version in the repositories aren't the newest and
then you can't get the latest versions and bug corrections. For avoid
all those problems I prefer get the latest version directly from the
CTAN. This summer will be TeXlive 2015 but I don't know if that could
be helpful for you.
I usually don't mind being a few years behind with latex, and I'd like
to keep using fedora's version. If there is _really_ no way to turn
hyphenation on for languages other than English, then it's a bug. I'll
do some more investigating, and if it doesn't turn up anything, I'll
file a bug report (and maintain my local \hyphenation{}).
Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] question about samba and account lockout
We've been using the old Sun Directory Server (DSEE7) for a long time and have had things working in such a way that when a user on linux or windows locks the account after so many failures, neither windows nor linux will allow them to log in. The way that was done was to modify the samba source code (in lib/smbldap.c) to point the SambaKickoffTime variable to pwdaccountlockedtime from the LDAP server. This worked. We want to move to the 389 directory server and perform the same function, but I'm having some issues. The pwdaccountlockedtime isn't there anymore. When the account locks, I see that we have the accountunlocktime attribute being set. Unfortunately, I can't use that field for samba since it's looking for unix time in seconds. The default value of accountunlocktime is Jan 1 1970, so samba thinks that this is some date in the year 600,000+. So, are any of the following things possible? If so, how can I do it? 1) When an account locks out on the DS, automatically set the SambaKickoffTime attribute in DS to the current time in seconds 2) Change the default value of accountunlocktime to 00Z instead of 1970 3) Change the format of the sambakickofftime inside of samba so that it will acknowledge what the DS offers it. 4) Some other way to get samba to acknowledge that account cannot login automatically upon lockout from DS. Thanks for your help. -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] selinux problem with centos 7.1
On Friday, April 17, 2015 03:27:05 PM Angel Bosch wrote:
hi,
I'm having problems installing a new test environment on centos 7.1
when I execute setup-ds-admin.pl i get this message:
Adding port 389 to selinux policy failed - ValueError: SELinux policy is
not managed or store
cannot be accessed.
I've tried with --debug and it keeps retrying every 5 seconds with same
message.
# lsb_release -a
LSB Version: :core-4.1-amd64:core-4.1-noarch
Distributor ID: CentOS
Description: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core)
Release: 7.1.1503
Codename: Core
# sestatus
SELinux status: disabled
the only irregular thing is that im using an openvz container, but I have
plenty of other DS
inside openvz without any problems.
i managed to continue with the installation with a very dirty hack, I
modified DSCreate.pm script
and added a return in the beggining of updateSelinuxPolicy sub:
sub updateSelinuxPolicy {
my $inf = shift;
return 0;
did anyone got this same problem?
abosch
I went through this with Mageia. You either need to enable selinux (permissive)
or compile 389-ds
without selinux.
--
Best regards
Thomas Spuhler
All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature
ID 60114E63
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] selinux problem with centos 7.1
On Friday, April 17, 2015 04:19:47 PM Angel Bosch wrote: I went through this with Mageia. You either need to enable selinux (permissive) or compile 389-ds without selinux. do you mean I won't be able to execute it without selinux? or is just the installer? abosch -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users I think, it is just the installer. But I ended up to just build all the 389-ds packages without selinux Use the srpms, remove the --with-selinux line in the configure and build it. if your not using it anyway. -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] selinux problem with centos 7.1
I went through this with Mageia. You either need to enable selinux (permissive) or compile 389-ds without selinux. do you mean I won't be able to execute it without selinux? or is just the installer? abosch -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download
On 04/17/2015 11:48 AM, jd1008 wrote: On 04/17/2015 10:35 AM, German Racca wrote: On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the message. Any advice is welcome. Thanks in advance, Do either fedup --clean or fedup --resetbootloader and then rerun fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct The firewall of the university was blocking the mirrors, now it is working fine. Thanks anyway! German. Hi. I am running F21, but manpage does not show any paramater like --product=nonproduct I searched the manpage for the word product and did not find such a word. So, which version of fedup has the --product arg? Thanx The only version of fedup that required the --product argument was the upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, since products didn't exist before 21. To go from Fedora 21 to Fedora 22, you'll simply need to add the --network and --22 arguments, since your product is already in /etc/os-release. -- Dan Mossor Systems Engineer at Large Fedora KDE WG | Fedora QA Team | Fedora Server SIG Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx San Antonio, Texas, USA -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F21 XFCE : no nm-applet icon
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:34 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: Consider this tool as an alternative, in difficult times when GTK+ bug hits nm-applet: http://wicd.sourceforge.net https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/wicd What's funny about this nm-applet bug was that NetworkManager WAS running, but the icon wasn't appearing. Before the fix rolled in for F21, I used this command in a terminal to restart the panel, after which the nm icon appeared in the notification area every time: $ xfce4-panel -r -- Steven Rosenberg http://stevenrosenberg.net/blog http://blogs.dailynews.com/click stevenhrosenb...@gmail.com ste...@stevenrosenberg.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download
On 04/17/2015 12:32 PM, Dan Mossor wrote: On 04/17/2015 11:48 AM, jd1008 wrote: On 04/17/2015 10:35 AM, German Racca wrote: On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the message. Any advice is welcome. Thanks in advance, Do either fedup --clean or fedup --resetbootloader and then rerun fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct The firewall of the university was blocking the mirrors, now it is working fine. Thanks anyway! German. Hi. I am running F21, but manpage does not show any paramater like --product=nonproduct I searched the manpage for the word product and did not find such a word. So, which version of fedup has the --product arg? Thanx The only version of fedup that required the --product argument was the upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, since products didn't exist before 21. To go from Fedora 21 to Fedora 22, you'll simply need to add the --network and --22 arguments, since your product is already in /etc/os-release. Cool. Good to know. Thanx! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download
On 04/17/2015 01:48 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 04/17/2015 10:35 AM, German Racca wrote: On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the message. Any advice is welcome. Thanks in advance, Do either fedup --clean or fedup --resetbootloader and then rerun fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct The firewall of the university was blocking the mirrors, now it is working fine. Thanks anyway! German. Hi. I am running F21, but manpage does not show any paramater like --product=nonproduct I searched the manpage for the word product and did not find such a word. So, which version of fedup has the --product arg? Thanx Well, I followed Fedora wiki, but now I see that the option is not specified in the man pages. Nevertheless, the option exists and it works! My version of fedup in F21 is the latest one. German. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: TeX hyphenation
2015-04-17 18:24 GMT+02:00, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net:
Andras Simon wrote:
What is the right way to enable hyphenation for languages other than
English for texlive in Fedora?
Is the situation as bad as described here?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLive#hyphenation
Have you looked at texlive-babel-italian ,
or whatever language you are interested in?
Yes, I'm using texlive-babel-hungarian, but latex says
Package magyar.ldf Warning: All Hungarian hyphenation= patterns missing.
(magyar.ldf)To make LaTeX hyphenate Hungarian words, please
(magyar.ldf)modify language.dat and rerun initex or texconfig.
But language.dat starts with
DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE (language.dat)! It is generated by tlmgr.
and tlmgr seems to be missing from Fedora's version of texlive. Full circle.
There seem to be a large number of languages covered in this way.
also the associated texlive-babel-italian-doc , or whatever.
I admit that when I have tried this before (with hebrew and ancient greek)
I did have problems finding the appropriate fonts.
Fortunately, hungarian is not that bad in this respect. I just have to stick
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin2]{inputenc}
in the preamble.
Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download
On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the message. Any advice is welcome. Thanks in advance, Do either fedup --clean or fedup --resetbootloader and then rerun fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct The firewall of the university was blocking the mirrors, now it is working fine. Thanks anyway! German. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FedUp F20 to F21 FAILED download
On 04/17/2015 10:35 AM, German Racca wrote: On 04/13/2015 08:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/14/15 01:43, Germán Racca wrote: I'm performing upgrade from Fedora 20 to 21, the download of the packages was fine until it reached the end of the list and failed with one package (libbabeltrace). Please see the output[*] at the end of the message. Any advice is welcome. Thanks in advance, Do either fedup --clean or fedup --resetbootloader and then rerun fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct The firewall of the university was blocking the mirrors, now it is working fine. Thanks anyway! German. Hi. I am running F21, but manpage does not show any paramater like --product=nonproduct I searched the manpage for the word product and did not find such a word. So, which version of fedup has the --product arg? Thanx -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Is Hibernate going to be fixed any time soon?
Would appreciate some timelines on this problem. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is Hibernate going to be fixed any time soon?
On 04/17/2015 12:55 PM, jd1008 wrote: Would appreciate some timelines on this problem. If you've filed a BZ on it, there should be activity on that entry. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is Hibernate going to be fixed any time soon?
On 04/17/2015 03:05 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 04/17/2015 12:55 PM, jd1008 wrote: Would appreciate some timelines on this problem. If you've filed a BZ on it, there should be activity on that entry. Sorry Rick, I must not be the only one experiencing this problem. I am certain many others are having the same problem. My exprience with filing bugs with bugzilla.redhat.com and with bugzilla.kernel.com (upstream) has been very unrewarding and unproductive, and problems I report have largely gone unresolved or dismissed as either will not fix, insufficient information, or unreproducible, or duplicates of some other bugs files long before I files mine. When I read the supposed bug for which mine was deemed a duplicate, I have seen the problem is not what I was reporting or was only slightly similar, with different symptoms and side effects. So, I have gotten very weary of this B*11**it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is Hibernate going to be fixed any time soon?
On Apr 17, 2015 4:18 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/17/2015 03:05 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 04/17/2015 12:55 PM, jd1008 wrote: Would appreciate some timelines on this problem. If you've filed a BZ on it, there should be activity on that entry. Sorry Rick, I must not be the only one experiencing this problem. I am certain many others are having the same problem. My exprience with filing bugs with bugzilla.redhat.com and with bugzilla.kernel.com (upstream) has been very unrewarding and unproductive, and problems I report have largely gone unresolved or dismissed as either will not fix, insufficient information, or unreproducible, or duplicates of some other bugs files long before I files mine. When I read the supposed bug for which mine was deemed a duplicate, I have seen the problem is not what I was reporting or was only slightly similar, with different symptoms and side effects. So, I have gotten very weary of this B*11**it. -- If you're having trouble providing requested information or sufficient context for a bug, the qa list (t...@lists.fp.o) might be a good place to ask for help. Also remember that different symptoms may share and underlying cause, wrt duplicate marked bugs. Basically, problems that are not reported are less likely to be fixed. What you do with that is up to you. The best way to have an answer to your question is to file a bug and see it through, or if it's a common problem, find a bug already filed and CC yourself. You could ask for help here in remedying the issue, and determining if configuration or code are at fault. If you don't want to file a bug, fine; if you don't want to continue the discussion about configuration, that's fine too. Do consider the audience you sent this mail to, though. It isn't the power management subsystem developer community, and even if it were, I don't think what you're doing would be motivating. --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is Hibernate going to be fixed any time soon?
On 04/17/2015 03:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 04/17/2015 03:18 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 04/17/2015 03:05 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 04/17/2015 12:55 PM, jd1008 wrote: Would appreciate some timelines on this problem. If you've filed a BZ on it, there should be activity on that entry. Sorry Rick, I must not be the only one experiencing this problem. I am certain many others are having the same problem. My exprience with filing bugs with bugzilla.redhat.com and with bugzilla.kernel.com (upstream) has been very unrewarding and unproductive, and problems I report have largely gone unresolved or dismissed as either will not fix, insufficient information, or unreproducible, or duplicates of some other bugs files long before I files mine. When I read the supposed bug for which mine was deemed a duplicate, I have seen the problem is not what I was reporting or was only slightly similar, with different symptoms and side effects. So, I have gotten very weary of this B*11**it. Did you update YOUR BZ to state that the symptoms and side effects were different than the one they referred to? Keep in mind that there are different people triaging BZs than those who actually do the work fixing things and the triagers may have just looked at the description superficially and marked it duplicate. They do get a LOT of duplicate reports, after all. You could also post over on the fedora-devel list. Make sure you tell them that you BZ'd it and it was blown off as a dupe when it really isn't. Sorry, meant the fedora-test list. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is Hibernate going to be fixed any time soon?
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:36:47 -0600 Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote: On Apr 17, 2015 4:18 PM, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/17/2015 03:05 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 04/17/2015 12:55 PM, jd1008 wrote: Would appreciate some timelines on this problem. If you've filed a BZ on it, there should be activity on that entry. Sorry Rick, I must not be the only one experiencing this problem. I am certain many others are having the same problem. My exprience with filing bugs with bugzilla.redhat.com and with bugzilla.kernel.com (upstream) has been very unrewarding and unproductive, and problems I report have largely gone unresolved or dismissed as either will not fix, insufficient information, or unreproducible, or duplicates of some other bugs files long before I files mine. When I read the supposed bug for which mine was deemed a duplicate, I have seen the problem is not what I was reporting or was only slightly similar, with different symptoms and side effects. So, I have gotten very weary of this B*11**it. -- If you're having trouble providing requested information or sufficient context for a bug, the qa list (t...@lists.fp.o) might be a good place to ask for help. Also remember that different symptoms may share and underlying cause, wrt duplicate marked bugs. Basically, problems that are not reported are less likely to be fixed. What you do with that is up to you. The best way to have an answer to your question is to file a bug and see it through, or if it's a common problem, find a bug already filed and CC yourself. You could ask for help here in remedying the issue, and determining if configuration or code are at fault. If you don't want to file a bug, fine; if you don't want to continue the discussion about configuration, that's fine too. Do consider the audience you sent this mail to, though. It isn't the power management subsystem developer community, and even if it were, I don't think what you're doing would be motivating. --Pete I agree, I have to say, BZ has been very good in most of my cases: however, it also depends on the respondent. An example of a bug not having been fixed is the one on ssh-agent not started in LXDE which has been pending since F14 -- I gave up on lxdm and replaced it with slim. (Lately, I have gone away from using any DE so this is not at all an issue anymore for me). Btw, I always thought that this hibernate not enabled by default without hoops was a decision (feature) of Fedora maintainers since F20 and not really a reportable bug. But it would help to get it reversed. (Why should a feature which exists in the kernel be disabled by default? -- linux is supposed to be about the ability to do stuff...not meaning to start a war here, but it really needs revisiting). So, please go ahead and report it: you may well be pleasantly surprised. Ranjan Can't remember your password? Do you need a strong and secure password? Use Password manager! It stores your passwords protects your account. Check it out at http://mysecurelogon.com/password-manager -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is Hibernate going to be fixed any time soon?
On 04/17/2015 03:18 PM, jd1008 wrote: On 04/17/2015 03:05 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: On 04/17/2015 12:55 PM, jd1008 wrote: Would appreciate some timelines on this problem. If you've filed a BZ on it, there should be activity on that entry. Sorry Rick, I must not be the only one experiencing this problem. I am certain many others are having the same problem. My exprience with filing bugs with bugzilla.redhat.com and with bugzilla.kernel.com (upstream) has been very unrewarding and unproductive, and problems I report have largely gone unresolved or dismissed as either will not fix, insufficient information, or unreproducible, or duplicates of some other bugs files long before I files mine. When I read the supposed bug for which mine was deemed a duplicate, I have seen the problem is not what I was reporting or was only slightly similar, with different symptoms and side effects. So, I have gotten very weary of this B*11**it. Did you update YOUR BZ to state that the symptoms and side effects were different than the one they referred to? Keep in mind that there are different people triaging BZs than those who actually do the work fixing things and the triagers may have just looked at the description superficially and marked it duplicate. They do get a LOT of duplicate reports, after all. You could also post over on the fedora-devel list. Make sure you tell them that you BZ'd it and it was blown off as a dupe when it really isn't. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- -If your broker is so damned smart...why is he still working?- -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: TeX hyphenation
Andras Simon wrote: What is the right way to enable hyphenation for languages other than English for texlive in Fedora? Is the situation as bad as described here? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLive#hyphenation Have you looked at texlive-babel-italian , or whatever language you are interested in? There seem to be a large number of languages covered in this way. also the associated texlive-babel-italian-doc , or whatever. I admit that when I have tried this before (with hebrew and ancient greek) I did have problems finding the appropriate fonts. -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
