Re: F22 KDE How To Remove "Software Updates" Widget? (Solved)
Allegedly, on or about 03 June 2015, Ed Greshko sent: > FWIW, the default GNOME way is also to allow non-privileged users to > apply updates. I can see pluses and minuses to that, but mostly minuses. I hope it's administratable. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. ZNQR LBH YBBX! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: GDM memory use
On 06/03/15 10:48, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> $ a=0; ps axfu | grep ^gdm| awk '{print $6}' | \
> (while read x ; do a=$(( a + x )) ; done ; echo $a )
> 400760
>
> Does anyone else notice that gdm's session takes up 300-400MB of RAM? I
> typically defend GNOME, but this is kind of ridiculous.
I show 359852 while a system running sddm shows 10732
--
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora -
https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22 KDE How To Remove "Software Updates" Widget? (Solved)
On 06/02/15 07:08, Ed Greshko wrote: > I'm not a GNOME user, but I need to check what it does. If I recall, it > downloads updates in the background and installs on reboot. I wonder if that > is true for non-wheel users as well. FWIW, the default GNOME way is also to allow non-privileged users to apply updates. -- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: sound problem in F20, F21, F22
On 06/02/2015 03:03 PM, Steven Stern wrote: On 06/02/2015 01:52 PM, dwoody5654 wrote: Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments but none fixed the problem. This is the link to bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101278 And now I am officially confused. To recap: This computer is used for Mythtv. The computer was build by me in 2007 using a Asus m2a-vm MB and until kernel 3.12.x sound has always worked. I always used alsa not pulseaudio. The F20 initial release, sound worked with 3.11.10-301.fc20.i686+PAE All future releases of the kernel the sound did not work. Searched Asus for a bios upgrade to address the problem - no upgrade related. Tried the following live dvd releases (stock live session included pulseaudio) to no avail: F21 xfce F22 xfce Centos 7.0 Linux mint 17.1 Since F20 is EOL and should move to F21 I bought a sound card for the computer (Diamond brand from Best Buy). Booting the 3.11.x kernel. Sound card was recognized. I set Mythtv to use the new sound card. Sound worked. Booting the 3.19.x kernel Sound card was recognized. Sound did not work. I put a new drive (spare) in the computer. Install F22 xfce instead of a live session. Sound card was recognized. Used Rhythmbox to test. No sound. Pulseaudio volume control clearly showed sound coming in. I thought that adding a sound card would have worked around the problem and it did not. I am clearly over looking something but do not know what. Any ideas on what to do or look for next will be very appreciated, David Run the pulse audio volume control and make sure the new sound card is the default output and that rhythmbox is playing to it. Thanks for the reply. Where do I set the default output in pavucontrol for the new sound card? The device I need to use for sound is card:0 device:2. In what program/config file is that set? I put the extra hdd in the computer and booted. running pavucontrol I saw that when playing from rhythumbox and firefox both audios were displayed. I selected the new sound card for the output in the first tab and no sound, although the volume lines indicated that audio was incoming. On the configure tab when I plugged the audio wire into the built-in sound card, pavucontrol indicated when it was plugged in and when not. But it did not send any sound to the tv. Going back to the original hdd and 3.11.x kernel, the sound works with both the built-in sound card and the new sound card. David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
help for module install
i need add module in boot kernel in the install ? it's possible ? The module is megasr for lsi raid driver. Thanks for regards -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
GDM memory use
$ a=0; ps axfu | grep ^gdm| awk '{print $6}' | \
(while read x ; do a=$(( a + x )) ; done ; echo $a )
400760
Does anyone else notice that gdm's session takes up 300-400MB of RAM? I
typically defend GNOME, but this is kind of ridiculous.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 13:48 -0400, Digimer wrote: > I dealt with this by setting names I want in > /etc/udev/rules/70-persistent-net.rules to match MAC to device names > (and then the name to IP in the usual ifcfg-X files). Yup, did that one long ago. Now where do I lock down the names of my displays? Finally came to F21 this weekend and my docking fixup script broke yet again because some idiot decided renaming all of the displays from a zero based numbering scheme to a one based names was worth breaking things over. Don't even remember what the change was last time, but it was something equally pointless. Of course in the long ago I didn't even NEED a docking script, Gnome just did the right thing on its own. Long ago. Changing existing names of things for trivial reasons should be an offense at least worthy of scorn and verbal abuse, but increasingly it is accepted and even praised. Not to mention docking in general has 'strongly discouraged' ever since the Tablet Madness hit. Mate lets be escape enough of it to be mostly useful, just so long as I remember that shutdown or reboot will fail when docked and apparently is a 'won't fix, you shouldn't do that' bug. Really wish I could find a way to change the power management behavior when a session isn't running, even if I could just disable ALL power management until a mate-power-manager could start. > Little less drastic than switch to BSD, where really, you're trading one > set of headaches for another. Switching operating systems over one bug is drastic, but increasingly it is more a philosophical divergence. The UNIX way vs whatever this new RedHat computing model is supposed to be called. Inertia keeps me running updates instead of reinstalling but when I finally replace this Thinkpad it will probably be time to distro/OS hunt. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: sound problem in F20, F21, F22
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:03:34 -0500 Steven Stern wrote: > On 06/02/2015 01:52 PM, dwoody5654 wrote: > > Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments > > but none fixed the problem. > > This is the link to bug report: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101278 > > > > And now I am officially confused. > > To recap: > > This computer is used for Mythtv. > > The computer was build by me in 2007 using a Asus m2a-vm MB and > > until kernel 3.12.x sound has always worked. I always used alsa not > > pulseaudio. > > > > The F20 initial release, sound worked with 3.11.10-301.fc20.i686+PAE > > All future releases of the kernel the sound did not work. > > Searched Asus for a bios upgrade to address the problem - no upgrade > > related. > > > > Tried the following live dvd releases (stock live session included > > pulseaudio) to no avail: > > > >F21 xfce > >F22 xfce > >Centos 7.0 > >Linux mint 17.1 > > > > Since F20 is EOL and should move to F21 I bought a sound card for > > the computer (Diamond brand from Best Buy). > > > > Booting the 3.11.x kernel. > > Sound card was recognized. I set Mythtv to use the new sound card. > > Sound worked. > > > > Booting the 3.19.x kernel > > Sound card was recognized. > > Sound did not work. > > > > I put a new drive (spare) in the computer. > > Install F22 xfce instead of a live session. Sound card was > > recognized. Used Rhythmbox to test. No sound. Pulseaudio volume > > control clearly showed sound coming in. > > > > I thought that adding a sound card would have worked around the > > problem and it did not. > > I am clearly over looking something but do not know what. > > > > Any ideas on what to do or look for next will be very appreciated, > > > > David > > > > Run the pulse audio volume control and make sure the new sound card is > the default output and that rhythmbox is playing to it. > Another suggestion. Run aplay -lv . That will show you the devices that alsa thinks are on your system. Sometimes, a video card will look like a sound device to alsa. And if you have more than one sound device, they can be loaded in different order each time. There is a way to pin devices to locations in alsa. It has to do with putting a file in /etc/modprobe.d. A search should turn up the technique and some samples if you need it. You can also check whether your device is configured correctly under alsa using alsamixer -c[device number]. Make sure that everything is turned on, and the volumes are reasonable. Alsa is under pulse, so if it isn't configured correctly, pulse will have problems. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: f22 fedup with btrfs snapshot?
Il giorno mar, 02/06/2015 alle 13.22 -0400, Neal Becker ha scritto: > so that I can backout to f21 if I don't > like it? Curiosity, how do you know that f22 work worse respect f21, unless you do not try it for a while? For example, if you want to try Evolution (or some other local application with local data), you must download your mail, and you will try to write a message to send, just so you can discover that the editor of evolution is worse than the previous, and when you use undo (ctrl + z) undo does not do "undo" but something else and dirty your text (this, unfortunately, is a real problem that happens even now as I write this message). At that point, if you do a revert to f21, you lose all messages that you have downloaded and all work that you have done in the meantime on your machine. At this point it is too late. In short, I do not think that you can find all regression, that invariably occur when you change a version of Fedora (or Nautilus, or Evolution, or some Gnome Applications), in just a few minutes of test and decide to come back. Probably is better test the new version on a simple virtual machine ... or not? Thanks for your attention. -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 22 con Gnome 3.16) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: sound problem in F20, F21, F22
On 06/02/2015 01:52 PM, dwoody5654 wrote: > Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments but > none fixed the problem. > This is the link to bug report: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101278 > > And now I am officially confused. > To recap: > This computer is used for Mythtv. > The computer was build by me in 2007 using a Asus m2a-vm MB and until > kernel 3.12.x sound has always worked. I always used alsa not pulseaudio. > > The F20 initial release, sound worked with 3.11.10-301.fc20.i686+PAE > All future releases of the kernel the sound did not work. > Searched Asus for a bios upgrade to address the problem - no upgrade > related. > > Tried the following live dvd releases (stock live session included > pulseaudio) to no avail: > >F21 xfce >F22 xfce >Centos 7.0 >Linux mint 17.1 > > Since F20 is EOL and should move to F21 I bought a sound card for the > computer (Diamond brand from Best Buy). > > Booting the 3.11.x kernel. > Sound card was recognized. I set Mythtv to use the new sound card. Sound > worked. > > Booting the 3.19.x kernel > Sound card was recognized. > Sound did not work. > > I put a new drive (spare) in the computer. > Install F22 xfce instead of a live session. Sound card was recognized. > Used Rhythmbox to test. No sound. Pulseaudio volume control clearly > showed sound coming in. > > I thought that adding a sound card would have worked around the problem > and it did not. > I am clearly over looking something but do not know what. > > Any ideas on what to do or look for next will be very appreciated, > > David > Run the pulse audio volume control and make sure the new sound card is the default output and that rhythmbox is playing to it. -- -- Steve -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
sound problem in F20, F21, F22
Posted here and on alsa mailing list some time ago - many comments but none fixed the problem. This is the link to bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101278 And now I am officially confused. To recap: This computer is used for Mythtv. The computer was build by me in 2007 using a Asus m2a-vm MB and until kernel 3.12.x sound has always worked. I always used alsa not pulseaudio. The F20 initial release, sound worked with 3.11.10-301.fc20.i686+PAE All future releases of the kernel the sound did not work. Searched Asus for a bios upgrade to address the problem - no upgrade related. Tried the following live dvd releases (stock live session included pulseaudio) to no avail: F21 xfce F22 xfce Centos 7.0 Linux mint 17.1 Since F20 is EOL and should move to F21 I bought a sound card for the computer (Diamond brand from Best Buy). Booting the 3.11.x kernel. Sound card was recognized. I set Mythtv to use the new sound card. Sound worked. Booting the 3.19.x kernel Sound card was recognized. Sound did not work. I put a new drive (spare) in the computer. Install F22 xfce instead of a live session. Sound card was recognized. Used Rhythmbox to test. No sound. Pulseaudio volume control clearly showed sound coming in. I thought that adding a sound card would have worked around the problem and it did not. I am clearly over looking something but do not know what. Any ideas on what to do or look for next will be very appreciated, David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: f22 fedup with btrfs snapshot?
Neal Becker wrote: > I have f21 installed on btrfs. I wonder what's a good procedure to use > fedup along with btrfs snapshot, so that I can backout to f21 if I don't > like it? > > Right now I have: > > sudo btrfs sub list / > ID 257 gen 67442 top level 5 path root > ID 318 gen 67442 top level 5 path home > > -- /etc/fstab > UUID=93c586fa-6d86-4148-a528-e61e644db0c8 / btrfs > subvol=root 0 0 > UUID=93c586fa-6d86-4148-a528-e61e644db0c8 /home btrfs > subvol=home 0 0 > UUID=e907e423-4282-4ca9-a873-b544d17d34b9 /boot ext4 > defaults1 2 > UUID=b0cde31d-3694-4b98-ad90-e28c7d35a869 swapswap > defaults0 0 > > I think this may be all I need: sudo mount /dev/sda3 /mnt [nbecker@nbecker2 ~]$ ls -l /mnt total 0 drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 14 Jun 1 18:46 home dr-xr-xr-x. 1 root root 172 Jun 2 09:39 root [nbecker@nbecker2 ~]$ sudo btrfs sub snap /mnt/root /mnt/root-f21 Create a snapshot of '/mnt/root' in '/mnt/root-f21' [nbecker@nbecker2 ~]$ ls -l /mnt total 0 drwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 14 Jun 1 18:46 home dr-xr-xr-x. 1 root root 172 Jun 2 09:39 root dr-xr-xr-x. 1 root root 172 Jun 2 09:39 root-f21 So now I have a snap of f21 root in in root-f21 subvol, and I should be able to rollback by editing grub.cfg and /etc/fstab to point to root-f21 subvol instead of root subvol, correct? -- Those who fail to understand recursion are doomed to repeat it -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: UPS shutdown happens how?
On 06/02/2015 09:34 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: That doesn't seem reasonable. It wouldn't shut down the system unless someone was actually logged in if gnome-settings-daemon were responsible for noticing the power failure. gdm also runs a GNOME session, and gnome-settings-daemon. I believe that control is given to whichever user "owns" the console. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
f22 fedup with btrfs snapshot?
I have f21 installed on btrfs. I wonder what's a good procedure to use fedup along with btrfs snapshot, so that I can backout to f21 if I don't like it? Right now I have: sudo btrfs sub list / ID 257 gen 67442 top level 5 path root ID 318 gen 67442 top level 5 path home -- /etc/fstab UUID=93c586fa-6d86-4148-a528-e61e644db0c8 / btrfs subvol=root 0 0 UUID=93c586fa-6d86-4148-a528-e61e644db0c8 /home btrfs subvol=home 0 0 UUID=e907e423-4282-4ca9-a873-b544d17d34b9 /boot ext4 defaults1 2 UUID=b0cde31d-3694-4b98-ad90-e28c7d35a869 swapswap defaults0 0 -- Those who fail to understand recursion are doomed to repeat it -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gdm busted?
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 09:36:31AM -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > Reboot (not sure just logging off works) and should be using the one > you chose. The following sequence should be enough: # systemctl isolate multi-user.target # systemctl isolate graphical.target Or maybe just stop the old one, start the new one. Both work only from a real tty though, your desktop session will be restarted. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22: cannot use rpmsign in script - problem with pinentry-gtk-2
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 12:12:05 -0400, Doug wrote: > > > On 06/02/2015 05:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:27:16 +0200, Pavel Lisý wrote: > > > >> Hello > >> > >> I've used rpmsign in script for long time. I worked fine. After upgrade to > >> Fedora 22 (from Fedora 20) something changed > >> > > /snip/ > > Pardon my stupidity, but what the heck is an rpmsign? What does it look like? > > --doug :) It's about a feature of RPM, to add a GPG signature to packages. See "dnf info rpm-sign" and the "rpmsign" manual included in there. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Swithing between gdm and kdm
On 06/02/2015 01:56 AM, Rene Harder Olsen wrote: Hello everybody. I have read the mails about enabling lightdm and disabling gdm. I have also tried it and what I found out was, it sets display manager via and ln which it modifies by creating a new one for the one which is enabled and removed the one which is disabled. Dnf says that kde and gdm is installed and when I changed it has no effect on graphic desktop displayed. Any tips or help is more than welcome. Can it has anything to do with the sudoers file I have set to no login at boot. i am not native English speaking person so please bear with me. Rene, lightdm and gdm are display managers, not desktops. The most visible difference between the two are the login prompt for your desktop and the way sessions are selected. lightdm uses fewer resources than gdm, with gdm really being a thinned-down version of gnome shell. Once you're past the login and session selection, then your desktop is handled by the window, desktop and session managers. I use XFCE, so my actual desktop is handled by xfwm4 (the window manager), xfce4-session (the session manager) and xfdesktop (the desktop manager). If you're running gnome, then I'd suggest staying with gdm as it does offer some underlying support for the Gnome desktop and may help Gnome start faster, but for XFCE and Mate, I'd recommend using lightdm. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- -I'm telling you that the kernel is stable not because it's a- -kernel, but because I refuse to listen to arguments like this. - - -- Linus Torvalds - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: UPS shutdown happens how?
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 08:52:50 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > If you're not running a GNOME session, I don't think the GNOME power > settings will be relevant to you. GNOME manages power in > gnome-settings-daemon. That doesn't seem reasonable. It wouldn't shut down the system unless someone was actually logged in if gnome-settings-daemon were responsible for noticing the power failure. (Of course, I could also believe gnome is silly enough to work that way, but I had hoped some other party was responsible for handling the power failure whenever it happened to occur). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22: cannot use rpmsign in script - problem with pinentry-gtk-2
On 06/02/2015 05:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:27:16 +0200, Pavel Lisý wrote: Hello I've used rpmsign in script for long time. I worked fine. After upgrade to Fedora 22 (from Fedora 20) something changed /snip/ Pardon my stupidity, but what the heck is an rpmsign? What does it look like? --doug -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: UPS shutdown happens how?
On 06/02/2015 07:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: I told it to shutdown when battery power is critical, but I'm wondering who the heck recognizes that. I don't run a gnome session, so is there some daemon that needs to be working for it to actually shutdown cleanly? If you're not running a GNOME session, I don't think the GNOME power settings will be relevant to you. GNOME manages power in gnome-settings-daemon. If your UPS is an APC model, you can use apcupsd. However, I recommend "nut" since it handles a wide variety of UPS types. IIRC, you'll want to install the "nut" and "nut-client" packages. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unwanted blinking notice -
On 02/06/15 11:19, Ted Roche wrote: Bob: What does the flashing notification say? . A flashing text window containing the URL subject name. I find it really annoying, it would be tolerable if it didn't blink/flash? . It doesn't seem to be an exact match for what you are describing, but I get a confirmation dialog asking me if I want to use FireFox or another web browser when I flip this setting: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.protocol-handler.warn-external-default In Thunderbird, hit the menu "hamburger" icon, then Preferences, Advanced, Config Editor. Search for: network.protocol-handler.warn-external.http This may void your Mozilla warranty, fwiw. . No, that doesn't look like the right thing and my warranty expired immediately after installation! . Thanks, you were the only response so I guess I'm the only one troubled by the feature, Bob On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: . In Thunderbird, when I click on a URL in a message it does what I expect it to and I don't need re-assurance the it has! It brings up a flashing notification in the top left corner that I would like to eliminate. Does anyone have a fix for that? This is an updated F22/64bit system. Bob -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
RE: UPS shutdown happens how?
-Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Tom Horsley Sent: dinsdag 2 juni 2015 16:54 To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: UPS shutdown happens how? I just got a new UPS at work which has a USB cable connection. If I look at the power settings in gnome-control-center, it claims to know I'm on a UPS, so I guess it knows how to talk to it. I told it to shutdown when battery power is critical, but I'm wondering who the heck recognizes that. I don't run a gnome session, so is there some daemon that needs to be working for it to actually shutdown cleanly? -Original Message- As with all in Linux-realm, there are several ways to obtain something. Not all UPS has a proper working intercase, or have one that is not compatible. A friend of mine solved it in a different way: On his UPS-protected machine, he pinged every minute a small box that is not UPS-protected. No reply? Decent shutdown! Also easy to test... __ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het electronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [solved] Anybody succeful as normal user in F22 with (x)sane together with an USB scanner?
On 06/02/2015 07:55 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 08:08 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>> On 01.06.2015, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody has similar problems?
>>
>> Could be a permission problem. You could try an udev rule to set it
>> accordingly. Put this in a file under /etc/udev/rules.d:
>>
>> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="04a9", ATTR{idProduct}=="220e",
>> MODE="0666"
>>
>
> Thank you for your answer, Heinz, but that did not help. Seems not to be
> a permission problem, because (as I already mentioned) simple-scan runs
> well.
>
> sane-backends problem??
>
> Kind regards
>
> Joachim Backes
>
Solved: I wanted to run xsane for saving the scanned image into a file,
but the filename given by myself contained a space char! By removing
this space char from the filename, scanning by xsane is now done properly!
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two)
Kernel-4.1.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc23.x86_64
Joachim Backes
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unwanted blinking notice -
Bob: What does the flashing notification say? It doesn't seem to be an exact match for what you are describing, but I get a confirmation dialog asking me if I want to use FireFox or another web browser when I flip this setting: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.protocol-handler.warn-external-default In Thunderbird, hit the menu "hamburger" icon, then Preferences, Advanced, Config Editor. Search for: network.protocol-handler.warn-external.http This may void your Mozilla warranty, fwiw. On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > . > In Thunderbird, when I click on a URL in a message it does what I expect it > to and I don't need re-assurance the it has! > > It brings up a flashing notification in the top left corner that I would > like to eliminate. Does anyone have a fix for that? > > This is an updated F22/64bit system. > > Bob > > -- > Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA > http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD > box10 FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: UPS shutdown happens how?
On 06/02/2015 10:53 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > I just got a new UPS at work which has a USB cable connection. > If I look at the power settings in gnome-control-center, > it claims to know I'm on a UPS, so I guess it knows how to > talk to it. > > I told it to shutdown when battery power is critical, but > I'm wondering who the heck recognizes that. I don't run > a gnome session, so is there some daemon that needs to > be working for it to actually shutdown cleanly? I have an APC UPS that I configured in fedora using apcupsd package. the config file is /etc/apcupsd/apcupsd.conf -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
UPS shutdown happens how?
I just got a new UPS at work which has a USB cable connection. If I look at the power settings in gnome-control-center, it claims to know I'm on a UPS, so I guess it knows how to talk to it. I told it to shutdown when battery power is critical, but I'm wondering who the heck recognizes that. I don't run a gnome session, so is there some daemon that needs to be working for it to actually shutdown cleanly? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: gdm busted?
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:12 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote: > On 06/01/2015 08:50 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: > > It seems that my GDM is hosed also; I see that both gdm and lightdm > > are installed (per fedup); how do I make the adjustment? > > > > Thank you. > http://ask.systutorials.com/524/how-to-replace-gdm-with-lightdm-on > -fedora > > # yum install lightdm lightdm-gtk > Then, disable gdm service and make the lightdm service be started by > systemd > > # systemctl disable gdm.service > # systemctl enable lightdm.service > After rebooting your Fedora Linux, lightdm should be the dm. You can also install system-switch-displaymanager and let that do it for you. dnf install system-switch-displaymanager system-switch-displaymanager gdm or system-switch-displaymanager lightdm or whichever want you want. Reboot (not sure just logging off works) and should be using the one you chose. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best lil town on Earth!" -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Eureka: New Kernel/hwdata recognizes my Kindle
I am a happy amphibian. -- David C. Hart - South Beach http://www.slowlyboiledfrog.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: error trying to enable copr
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 23:53 -0400, William Biggs wrote: > When I try to add copr repo . I type sudo dnf copr enable > user/project > . and When I get y I get this error . How do I get this to work > Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: > '/etc/yum.repos.d/_copr_user-project.repo You need to replace "user/project" with the real username and real project name of what you want added, such as below.. dnf copr enable gusrub/corebird Just browse the copr pages for the repository you want to add and then add that username and project name and then it should work. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best lil town on Earth!" -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: grub question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/2015 09:55 AM, François Patte wrote: > As far as I understand what you say, anaconda will re-install GRUB on > the MBR, will make fedora21 the default system and will write an entry > in GRUB menu to boot the debian system. > > Am I right? yes.. you run: # grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg that creates the file. Then, to install it: # grub2-install /dev/sda ( assuming you want it on the mbr of your first drive, sda) if you are doing an OS install, yes, it will create the file in mbr for you. - -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVbbbrAAoJEFOC6wwM39g1UcYH/jsYuvsy30Pf9dh2yOweUgO6 VgjHQi+f8276neFtIzQnpSbdj7FdW79u380Y2OQuor0ZAJKOgdtF1Xje/A+uaGKC kFdpAR2OGqeQiqB27E3tMUIgUr9ZJH4pI0kFaMx11j0VwAA63y1YWcN5PgZQvkZf 7wcaj+JiEZRw4hDVcbSGYn+lfbOm109MZ5mZd8++EzKYo7f8ZFm/YeTH83RVIdx4 g7sG6Zb2otWNiekgqjsgcjMHO/v1TsQNs4c3GyDNIuS1YeZ3F7071dBgjHMYQTi0 mpngP8x2bHoFx1kbajkrtRpduHspgXLct7CpjkgjVu41TqJjsMKjQLj+gT5dQxM= =OX+e -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: grub question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 02/06/2015 12:39, Paul Cartwright a écrit : > > On 06/02/2015 03:58 AM, François Patte wrote: >> I have a debian installed and I want to install on the same disk >> a fedora21. > >> Of course GRUB2 is installed to boot the debian install. > >> What will happen with GRUB during the fedora install: > >> will anaconda detect the debian install and ask me what to do? > >> will it detect the debian install and configure GRUB to boot >> both systems without saying anything? > >> will it unable to detect the debian install and erase the GRUB >> config? In that case how to recover my debian system boot? > >> will it tell me that it has detected a GRUB2 installation, but >> that its version is not compatible with the version shipped with >> fedora21? In that case, what to do? > >> will it whatever I cannot imagine > > >> Thank you for enlightments > >> - -- > whichever OS you install last will install grub2 and make that OS > the default, but it will find all installed OSes on your disk(S). > my default is fedora 22, but I also have fedora21 & windows on my > disks.. As far as I understand what you say, anaconda will re-install GRUB on the MBR, will make fedora21 the default system and will write an entry in GRUB menu to boot the debian system. Am I right? - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlVttcMACgkQdE6C2dhV2JV/AQCgqRQHg4xuDksYWiukmhw33JTT oUMAoLI3wfB+DBQl+8gTJb4ZwB/O2kMN =B8iY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
RE: I'm shocked, shocked!
-Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michael Hennebry Sent: dinsdag 2 juni 2015 7:20 To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: RE: I'm shocked, shocked! On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote: > -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Tom H > Sent: zondag 31 mei 2015 15:23 > To: Fedora Users > Subject: Re: I'm shocked, shocked! > > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> >> To see that the "predictable" network name for my one and only >> ethernet port has changed once again. >> On fedora 22 eno1 is what used to be em1. > > That's because you've moved from one "predictable" scheme to another... That is not a good enough excuse. *By design*, Fedora is a high-turnover distribution. Changing a naming scheme that security software relies on is a big deal. I'd suggest two utilities. One would record the current names and their mac addresses in a plain text file. The other would take such a file and update a configuration file to associate the names and mac addresses. The format of the file should remain constant between releases. -Original Message- I wasn't looking for an excuse. And it is not only security related, but more general networking. At how many places do you have to specify the name of your network device, and perhaps have to differentiate... Not just iptables, but routing, bridging, monitoring, building virtualized clients, etc etc etc No progress without change, but changing device-names isn't a trivial thing. I could write scripts on a test-machine, not needing to know the hardware layout of any intended target machines. Now I do need to know, or need to script around it. That is still fun, but changing documentation for real-end-users aint. :-) Hw __ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het electronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora22 - run remote graphical program on local display
On 01/06/2015 05:26 PM, Todor Petkov wrote: On 01/06/2015 05:03 PM, Todor Petkov wrote: My bad, the version for Centos5 is "OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008". Also, I noticed something else: when I log in Centos5 as root, the display is correct, but when I log with my LDAP user, firefox is started on my computer. Turns out, when I run firefox with "--no-remote", the display is correct. However, there is still a problem with the connection to another F22 machine and non-responsible window. I tried with seamonkey, same difference. Any ideas? Thanks, -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: grub question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/2015 03:58 AM, François Patte wrote: > I have a debian installed and I want to install on the same disk a > fedora21. > > Of course GRUB2 is installed to boot the debian install. > > What will happen with GRUB during the fedora install: > > will anaconda detect the debian install and ask me what to do? > > will it detect the debian install and configure GRUB to boot both > systems without saying anything? > > will it unable to detect the debian install and erase the GRUB config? > In that case how to recover my debian system boot? > > will it tell me that it has detected a GRUB2 installation, but that > its version is not compatible with the version shipped with fedora21? > In that case, what to do? > > will it whatever I cannot imagine > > > Thank you for enlightments > > - -- whichever OS you install last will install grub2 and make that OS the default, but it will find all installed OSes on your disk(S). my default is fedora 22, but I also have fedora21 & windows on my disks.. - -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #367800 and new counter #561587 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVbYfzAAoJEFOC6wwM39g1Cn0IAKCOuT1d5Rynfx2sq/TP8yXD xFJPF/kk7sxH3hUskS0+pupoUwNM7Yy4Gz9H1qxRPqfmdtBLcYRjI/KghN7lykKo ewnwGSwzK+QaSSTCBbj0F1tb65XsWRj5dGwxd5/b5Up3JOYaojLeFaVmSDGMp/p9 ArqH0Dp+q6s7AvyEwvaODV9COl3JTK2HhvGbbjZc6K1I79J8NVBW37rV4O+f7jJg FGNfq3u69SMX5rwPyMO6dWOQbmfqJEPfJkeKgtVAHqNohtvCI5MKJB6yzwZdJp1J Thq7oyL1E2cbQuAiLx6jIQMhwugxPYAITeh5ZQ7iJoJ5hUHJIzrZqA4++pebZO0= =Xn1x -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: I'm shocked, shocked!
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 00:20:28 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry wrote: > I'd suggest two utilities. > One would record the current names and > their mac addresses in a plain text file. > The other would take such a file and update a configuration > file to associate the names and mac addresses. > The format of the file should remain constant between releases. That is precisely how everything used to work before they started improving it :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 22: cannot use rpmsign in script - problem with pinentry-gtk-2
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:27:16 +0200, Pavel Lisý wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've used rpmsign in script for long time. I worked fine. After upgrade to
> Fedora 22 (from Fedora 20) something changed
>
> This script:
> - cut --
> export LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8
> if [ -n "$PASSPHRASE" ] ; then
> /usr/bin/expect -f - << EOF
> spawn rpmsign --addsign $RPMS_TO_SIGN
> match_max 10
> fork
> expect "Vložte heslovou frázi: "
> send -- "${PASSPHRASE}\r"
> expect eof
> EOF
> else
>echo "Set PASSPHRASE variable first"
> fi
> - cut --
>
> is starting now pinentry-gtk-2 and forces me to put passphrase to modal
> window.
Cannot confirm.
> Is any possibility how to disable this behaviour? Whatever I've found
> through google didn't work for me.
>
> Do you use rpmsign in script?
Expect or PyExpect used to be an option, yes, if you like storing the
passphrase somewhere.
Alternatively, you can redefine %{__gpg_sign_cmd} to your own invocation
of "gpg" when running rpm --addsign. That way you can add GPG options such
as --batch --use-agent and spare yourself the Expect script as you then can
use GPG Agent.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Swithing between gdm and kdm
Hello everybody. I have read the mails about enabling lightdm and disabling gdm. I have also tried it and what I found out was, it sets display manager via and ln which it modifies by creating a new one for the one which is enabled and removed the one which is disabled. Dnf says that kde and gdm is installed and when I changed it has no effect on graphic desktop displayed. Any tips or help is more than welcome. Can it has anything to do with the sudoers file I have set to no login at boot. i am not native English speaking person so please bear with me. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
grub question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I have a debian installed and I want to install on the same disk a fedora21. Of course GRUB2 is installed to boot the debian install. What will happen with GRUB during the fedora install: will anaconda detect the debian install and ask me what to do? will it detect the debian install and configure GRUB to boot both systems without saying anything? will it unable to detect the debian install and erase the GRUB config? In that case how to recover my debian system boot? will it tell me that it has detected a GRUB2 installation, but that its version is not compatible with the version shipped with fedora21? In that case, what to do? will it whatever I cannot imagine Thank you for enlightments - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlVtYiUACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXBKQCgzySiEXAXcSMshGvUX0AYaqRL ZtwAoKBv8H/cMnTATrI+2698PDB8DUIz =1aW7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Yumex doesn't take clean_requirements_on_remove into account (Re: kernel number in dnf)
- Original Message - > From: "Antonio M" > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:02:45 AM > Subject: kernel number in dnf > I switched from yumex to umex-dnf. This morning a new kernel was found, but I > got 4 kernels installed, even if my dnf,conf sounds like: > [main] > gpgcheck=1 > installonly_limit=3 > clean_requirements_on_remove=true > why?? > -- > Antonio Montagnani > Skype : amontag52 > Linux Fedora 21 (Twenty-one) > inviato da Gmail > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org I guess that's because Yumex doesn't take DNF's clean_requirements_on_remove into account. I wonder whether it's even desired because then the actual value of clean_requirements_on_remove would depend on the chosen backend and I believe that backend changes should not affect the behavior of the application. But I don't know Yumex... -- Radek Holý Associate Software Engineer Software Management Team Red Hat Czech -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 22: cannot use rpmsign in script - problem with pinentry-gtk-2
Hello
I've used rpmsign in script for long time. I worked fine. After upgrade to
Fedora 22 (from Fedora 20) something changed
This script:
- cut --
export LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8
if [ -n "$PASSPHRASE" ] ; then
/usr/bin/expect -f - << EOF
spawn rpmsign --addsign $RPMS_TO_SIGN
match_max 10
fork
expect "Vložte heslovou frázi: "
send -- "${PASSPHRASE}\r"
expect eof
EOF
else
echo "Set PASSPHRASE variable first"
fi
- cut --
is starting now pinentry-gtk-2 and forces me to put passphrase to modal
window.
Is any possibility how to disable this behaviour? Whatever I've found
through google didn't work for me.
Do you use rpmsign in script?
Pavel
--
Pavel Lisý
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
