Re: No login for mailman3

2015-11-24 Thread Robert Nichols 

On 11/24/2015 05:00 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:

On 11/24/2015 12:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

It looks like there was some issue and it wasn't appearing properly,
but should be now.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/accounts/login/?next=/admin/lists/users.lists.fedoraproject.org/


You can give the persona login any email at all.
If the folks who run that domain have a persona server it will then go
there for authentication. If they do not, then mozilla will by default
take care of authenticating you. (ie, it will send you a confirm and so
forth).


OK, the "persona" button is showing up now.

After several failures with actions that took me to "Page not found,"
I finally got that to work.

What a mess!  Thanks for the help.


Well, the logging in part works, but when I get to the page for the
"test" list, see a wonderful "Change Subscription" button, and click
on it, I am just informed, "You are already subscribed."  There is
an "Unsubscribe" button, but nothing else.

Worthless!  I'll just have to pester the list admin to make the
change I want.

--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: No login for mailman3

2015-11-24 Thread Robert Nichols 

On 11/24/2015 12:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:23:08 -0600
Robert Nichols  wrote:


OK, I created a fedoraproject.org account and logged in, but I don't
see any "add email address" anywhere.  Do I have to agree to the
legalese in the FPCA just to manage my mailing list subscriptions?


no.

Go to 'my settings' at the top and there should be a link on that page
to 'add email address'.


I don't find any "my settings".  Across the very top I see "Logged in:" 
and my ID, "About", "Welcome" with my name, and "Logout".  None of those

get me anywhere useful.  In the banner below the Fedora logo I see
"Learn about Fedora", "Download Fedora", "Projects", "Join Fedora",
"Communicate", "Help/Documentation", and "Code of Conduct".  As above,
nothing useful.  In the sidebar at the left I see "Home", "My Account",
"Group List", "Join a Group", "Yubikey", and "News".  "My Account" looks
promising, but doesn't take me to anything that allows me to add an
email address. (I can change my password or security question, enter
my latitude and longitude, set my time zone, etc.)



Where do I find this "persona login link"?  From what I can find via
search engines, it's going to want my @fedoraproject.org email
address, and that is _not_ going to link to my existing mailing list
subscriptions.


It looks like there was some issue and it wasn't appearing properly,
but should be now.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/accounts/login/?next=/admin/lists/users.lists.fedoraproject.org/

You can give the persona login any email at all.
If the folks who run that domain have a persona server it will then go
there for authentication. If they do not, then mozilla will by default
take care of authenticating you. (ie, it will send you a confirm and so
forth).


OK, the "persona" button is showing up now.

After several failures with actions that took me to "Page not found,"
I finally got that to work.

What a mess!  Thanks for the help.

--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: non ascii file

2015-11-24 Thread Pete Travis 
On Nov 24, 2015 1:43 PM, "Patrick Dupre"  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am an non ascii file (ISO-8859 text executable),
> how can I get the lines containing non ascii characters?
>
> Thank.
>
>
===
>  Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
>  Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
>  Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
>  Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
>  189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
>
===
> -

What are you trying to do with this file, and how does identifying the
non-ASCII characters help?

--Pete
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: non ascii file

2015-11-24 Thread Dave Mitchell 
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 08:43:24PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am an non ascii file (ISO-8859 text executable),
> how can I get the lines containing non ascii characters?

perl -ne'print if /[^\x00-\x7f]/' infile > outfile


-- 
This is a great day for France!
-- Nixon at Charles De Gaulle's funeral
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: xfce in 21

2015-11-24 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan 
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 14:42 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Is 4.12 ever going to be in the official 21 repositories ?

F21's days are numbered, so "official 21 repositories" will very soon
have no meaning.

poc
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

non ascii file

2015-11-24 Thread Patrick Dupre 
Hello,

I am an non ascii file (ISO-8859 text executable),
how can I get the lines containing non ascii characters?

Thank.

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: xfce in 21

2015-11-24 Thread stan 
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:42:37 -0500
Frank McCormick  wrote:

> I am still running Fedora 21 with various desktops including XFCE.
> 
> Because of various bugs in the version I am running
> I wanted to update to 4.12 -- 4.10 is the current
> Fedora 21 version.
> 
> A user on the XFCE forum pointed me to a user
> repository on Fedora which has 4.12...and this morning
> I updated without a problem.
> 
> Is 4.12 ever going to be in the official 21 repositories ?
> 

I have no official knowledge, but end of life on F21 is about a week
away, so I would say no.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fedora 23] Installing KDE Plasma as a second Desktop Environment! [bug]

2015-11-24 Thread Mihuleac Sergiu 

Thanks for the info. So when i've installed kde with command $ dnf
groupinstall "KDE Plasma Workspaces", i couldn't use it, but after i've
removed it i've installed like this $ dnf install @kde-desktop
Then all worked well, the idea came from here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KDE

I discovered that KDE was faster then gnome, and all the apps opened
faster and so on, and it was a big surprise for me, i wasn't expecting
it, but i removed it, because i did not liked the idea behind it, even
if gnome still have a lot of work in front of it, i prefer to be closer
to the cli. for me 1 screen isn't enough so gnome make's it very easy to
switch between them, i could also have shortcuts in kde to, but it
wouldn't be the same.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: non ascii file

2015-11-24 Thread Gordon Messmer 

On 11/24/2015 12:42 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote:

how can I get the lines containing non ascii characters?

perl -ne'print if /[^\x00-\x7f]/' infile > outfile


...and if you want to look for ascii control characters (and delete) in 
addition to non-ascii, maybe:


perl -ne 'print if /[^\x20-\x7e]/' infile
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

xfce in 21

2015-11-24 Thread Frank McCormick 

I am still running Fedora 21 with various desktops including XFCE.

Because of various bugs in the version I am running
I wanted to update to 4.12 -- 4.10 is the current
Fedora 21 version.

A user on the XFCE forum pointed me to a user
repository on Fedora which has 4.12...and this morning
I updated without a problem.

Is 4.12 ever going to be in the official 21 repositories ?

Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Xsane problem -

2015-11-24 Thread Bob Goodwin 
I just discovered that I can not use my flat bed scanner, xsane protests 
"no devices available."


lsusb shows:

Bus 005 Device 007: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110

I believe this has worked since installing F-23 beta originally...

The last dnf upgrade was done this morning.

I have not seen othertrouble reports here on the list/

Any suggestions appreciated,

bob

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: xfce in 21

2015-11-24 Thread Joe Zeff 

On 11/24/2015 11:42 AM, Frank McCormick wrote:


Is 4.12 ever going to be in the official 21 repositories ?


F 21 reaches it's official EOL on December 1, 2015, so I find it highly 
unlikely.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: packages in /var/lib/system-upgrade

2015-11-24 Thread Rick Stevens 

On 11/24/2015 05:33 PM, sean darcy wrote:

On 11/24/2015 12:33 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 11/23/2015 08:24 PM, Stephen Davies wrote:

On 19/11/15 11:05, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 11/18/2015 04:25 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Rick Stevens writes:


On 11/18/2015 02:49 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:

Hello

I am plenty of file in
/var/lib/system-upgrade

Why ?


The system upgrade process downloads all the RPMs needed to upgrade
the
system to that directory, then creates a symlink called
"/system-upgrade" to point at it. When the system reboots in the
upgrade mode, it uses the symlink to actually upgrade the system.

If your upgrade is complete and clean, I think you can remove the
files in /var/lib/system-upgrade.


This should happen automatically on the first boot after a successfull
upgrade.


Didn't happen on 2 of the 3 machines I updated from F21 to F22, but
perhaps there were crumbs left over from the upgrade. They all booted
and run just fine and I don't think I saw any weirdness, but perhaps
there was something the first boot didn't like. My machines do tend to
become sorta "muddy" over time (I beat the kapok out of them) and
anything's possible.

No, I haven't upgraded to F23 yet. Still waiting for the dust to settle
a bit more.

The question remains>
Is it safe to delete this directory (given that rebooting does not)?


I checked at home and my F21->F22 left that present. I deleted it:

 rm -rf /var/lib/system-upgrade
 rm -f /system-upgrade

and rebooted with no ill effects so my guess is, yes, it's OK to delete
it once you've confirmed you're running OK in the upgraded environment.

And what about /var/cache/system-upgrade/default-installrepo/packages ?


I purged them via "rm -rf /var/cache/system-upgrade" as well.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-  "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick"  -
- themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."   -
-  -- Winston Churchill  -
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: packages in /var/lib/system-upgrade

2015-11-24 Thread sean darcy 

On 11/24/2015 12:33 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 11/23/2015 08:24 PM, Stephen Davies wrote:

On 19/11/15 11:05, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 11/18/2015 04:25 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Rick Stevens writes:


On 11/18/2015 02:49 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:

Hello

I am plenty of file in
/var/lib/system-upgrade

Why ?


The system upgrade process downloads all the RPMs needed to upgrade
the
system to that directory, then creates a symlink called
"/system-upgrade" to point at it. When the system reboots in the
upgrade mode, it uses the symlink to actually upgrade the system.

If your upgrade is complete and clean, I think you can remove the
files in /var/lib/system-upgrade.


This should happen automatically on the first boot after a successfull
upgrade.


Didn't happen on 2 of the 3 machines I updated from F21 to F22, but
perhaps there were crumbs left over from the upgrade. They all booted
and run just fine and I don't think I saw any weirdness, but perhaps
there was something the first boot didn't like. My machines do tend to
become sorta "muddy" over time (I beat the kapok out of them) and
anything's possible.

No, I haven't upgraded to F23 yet. Still waiting for the dust to settle
a bit more.

The question remains>
Is it safe to delete this directory (given that rebooting does not)?


I checked at home and my F21->F22 left that present. I deleted it:

 rm -rf /var/lib/system-upgrade
 rm -f /system-upgrade

and rebooted with no ill effects so my guess is, yes, it's OK to delete
it once you've confirmed you're running OK in the upgraded environment.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- Blessed be the peacekeepers, for they shall be shot at from-
-both sides. -
--- A.M. Greeley -
--

And what about /var/cache/system-upgrade/default-installrepo/packages ?

sean

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fedora 23] Installing KDE Plasma as a second Desktop Environment! [bug]

2015-11-24 Thread Jon LaBadie 
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:19:02PM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 09:41 +, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > ...  most people assume that in order to change DE youi have to change DM!
> > The "slightly different capabilities" you describe are so slight as
> > make the whole idea of using multiple DMs a pointless exercise.
> 
> Not so. As I think I mentioned once already, I changed from SDDM back
> to KDM because the former doesn't support automatically opening gnome-
> keyring on login. This is not a crippling failure, but it is a real
> annoyance.

You are not "using" multiple DMs, you have chosen to use one of several
DMs available.

jl
-- 
Jon H. LaBadie  jo...@jgcomp.com
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Xsane problem -

2015-11-24 Thread Joachim Backes 

On 24.11.2015 21:41, Bob Goodwin wrote:

I just discovered that I can not use my flat bed scanner, xsane protests
"no devices available."

lsusb shows:

Bus 005 Device 007: ID 04a9:1909 Canon, Inc. CanoScan LiDE 110

I believe this has worked since installing F-23 beta originally...

The last dnf upgrade was done this morning.

I have not seen othertrouble reports here on the list/

Any suggestions appreciated,

bob



Bob,

did you try to access the scanner as root user? In earlier times, I had 
sometimes similar problems, and accessing the scanner as root user was a 
workaround.


I'm running a fully updated F23 too, and my USB scanner Canon-Lide30 
still operates flawlessly:


Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04a9:220e Canon, Inc. CanoScan N1240U/LiDE 30

Joachim Backes

--

Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three)
Kernel-4.2.6-301.fc23.x86_64


Joachim Backes 
http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] Re: multimaster replication and index corruption

2015-11-24 Thread Rich Megginson 

On 11/24/2015 10:28 AM, ghiureai wrote:

On 11/24/2015 09:11 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:

On 11/24/2015 10:02 AM, ghiureai wrote:



Rich and the List Thank for your  continue support,

We are still  seeing a index issues with memberof plugging, we  are 
not sure at this point if this is related to our software or the 
plugin cfg  behavior, I see 2 entries files.db4 for memberof plugin  
see bellow, is this correct?
the 389-admin GUI shows only the memberof indexed, when I try to 
check for index corruption and run


-rw--- 1 ldap-ds ldap-ds   4005888 Oct 20 13:01 memberOf.db4
--rw--- 1 ldap-ds ldap-ds   3915776 Nov 23 07:58 memberof.db4


That's very bad.  I thought we fixed that case issue with db files a 
long time ago.

So, how do I fix this 2 files for memberof ?


Try shutting down the server, then remove those two files, then use 
db2index to recreate the memberof index.






when I try to check for index values and use either  memberof  or 
memberOf files for the following attribute fails, what I am missing?



   dbscan -f /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ldap/db/userRoot/memberof.db4
  -k "dc=xxx,dc=com"
  Can't find key 'dc=xxx,dc=com'



Not sure.  Try doing dbscan -f 
/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ldap/db/userRoot/memberof.db4 first, to see 
what the keys look like






same for


  memberOf.db4 file







Thank you
Isabella

On 11/10/2015 11:12 AM, ghiureai wrote:

Rich, thank you for all support  for last day , unfortunately there is a
strong wave in developers team:" the multimaster replication is creating
issues with UI"  ( I do not  totally agree since  can not  be reproduce+
full describe the issues).
Is been decided to moved down to master slave,  please I need to know if
I still need to  exclude member of plugin from replication in this case ?



Thanks a lot
Isabella
   On 11/10/2015 09:23 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:

On 11/10/2015 10:14 AM, Adrian Damian wrote:

Rich,

Thanks for your help. Let me jump in with more details.

We've seen index corruption on a number of occasions. It seems to
affect searchable attributes for which there are indexes. Queries on
an attribute in LDAP that used to work suddenly stopped working. They
would return incomplete results and no results at all, although the
data on the server was the same. The fix on those situations was to
drop the index corresponding to the attribute and re-create it.

So in this case, you have some sort of LDAP search client, and you are
doing a search for '(indexed_attribute=known_value)' and you are not
seeing a result, and this is what you mean by "index corruption"?

Are you aware of the dbscan tool?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Configuration_Command_and_File_Reference/dbscan.html

This tool allows you to examine the index file in the database directly.

dbscan -f
/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-instance_name/db/userRoot/indexed_attribute.db4 -k
known_value

This will allow you to look at the indexed_attribute index directly for
the value "known_value".


We've run the db fix script that the LDAP distribution comes with

What db fix script?  Do you have a link to it, or a link to the product
documentation for the script?


and there are no reports of corruption when this problem occurs. That
makes it very hard to detect. We don't know what else to look for when
we run into this again and more importantly, we don't know what
triggers it and how to prevent it.

Mind you we are currently doing active development changing both the
software clients that access the LDAP servers as well as the
configurations of the servers. It is possible to had been written to
both masters in the master replication configuration when the problem
occurred but because there were multiple clients concurrently
accessing the servers it is hard to figure out what triggered the issue.


Adrian



On 11/09/2015 05:06 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:

On 11/09/2015 05:47 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:

Hi Rich,
Thank you for your feedback , as always greatly appreciate when
comes from  389-DS RH support.
We are  not using vm just plain hardware, here is the description
I  got from developers team related to the issues they are seeing
when running   integration tests with multimaster replication :
"index corruption: put content, run tests: OK, do more stuff (reads,
writes, etc), ru tests: FAIL, notice "missing attributes", rebuild
index(ices), run tests: OK. "

What does this mean?  What program is printing these index corruption
messages?  Is it some tool provided by Red Hat?


Unfortunately, I understood  this cases/issue can not be reproduce
on regular basis,  no mode details can be provide at this time

All reads and writes are going to  only the master replication DS,
not slave .
  I totally agree with your this is the way to cfg and maintain
Directory  Server in a operation critical  env: multmaster
replication only one master for writes.
 Here is the DS version:
 rpm -qa | grep 389-ds

Re: packages in /var/lib/system-upgrade

2015-11-24 Thread Rick Stevens 

On 11/23/2015 08:24 PM, Stephen Davies wrote:

On 19/11/15 11:05, Rick Stevens wrote:

On 11/18/2015 04:25 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Rick Stevens writes:


On 11/18/2015 02:49 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:

Hello

I am plenty of file in
/var/lib/system-upgrade

Why ?


The system upgrade process downloads all the RPMs needed to upgrade the
system to that directory, then creates a symlink called
"/system-upgrade" to point at it. When the system reboots in the
upgrade mode, it uses the symlink to actually upgrade the system.

If your upgrade is complete and clean, I think you can remove the
files in /var/lib/system-upgrade.


This should happen automatically on the first boot after a successfull
upgrade.


Didn't happen on 2 of the 3 machines I updated from F21 to F22, but
perhaps there were crumbs left over from the upgrade. They all booted
and run just fine and I don't think I saw any weirdness, but perhaps
there was something the first boot didn't like. My machines do tend to
become sorta "muddy" over time (I beat the kapok out of them) and
anything's possible.

No, I haven't upgraded to F23 yet. Still waiting for the dust to settle
a bit more.

The question remains>
Is it safe to delete this directory (given that rebooting does not)?


I checked at home and my F21->F22 left that present. I deleted it:

rm -rf /var/lib/system-upgrade
rm -f /system-upgrade

and rebooted with no ill effects so my guess is, yes, it's OK to delete
it once you've confirmed you're running OK in the upgraded environment.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- Blessed be the peacekeepers, for they shall be shot at from-
-both sides. -
--- A.M. Greeley -
--
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fedora 23] Installing KDE Plasma as a second Desktop Environment! [bug]

2015-11-24 Thread Bill Oliver 

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:



I do it quite often. It does work, but you may find that some things
depend on which Desktop *Manager* you use (gdm, kdm, sddm, ...) as they
don't all support each other equally well. The specific manager you're
running (probably gdm for you) doesn't change just because you install
a new Desktop *Environment* but you can do it manually.

If you want to discuss KDE under Fedora I strongly advise subscribing
to the Fedora KDE list, see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists
/kde.lists.fedoraproject.org/

poc




I haven't switched to 23 yet, but I'll second that bit about choosing the right 
display manager as far as some previous releases go.  I used to play around 
with different desktops, and I found a significant difference is tiny bugs and 
performance when the right display manager was matched with the right desktop 
environment.

... though I have *never* gotten Enlightenment to work right in Fedora.


billo-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fedora 23] Installing KDE Plasma as a second Desktop Environment! [bug]

2015-11-24 Thread Sudhir Khanger 
On Tuesday 24 Nov 2015 10:37:48 PM you wrote:
> That page seems to suggest otherwise, that you've got to do an extra
> step in the command line.  That requires extra knowledge than just
> installing another desktop.  So they're in the same boat as us.

I think the command is triggered automatically when you install a new desktop 
environment so no there is no extras knowledge need to switch DM when doing a 
DE install.

I have not played with Ubuntu in a long time. I will have to do an install to 
be double sure of claims I am making. I will give it a try tomorrow.

Make sure you are replying to the list like you say in your long signature :).

-- 
Regards,
Sudhir Khanger,
sudhirkhanger.com.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] Re: multimaster replication and index corruption

2015-11-24 Thread Ludwig Krispenz 


On 11/24/2015 06:11 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:

On 11/24/2015 10:02 AM, ghiureai wrote:



Rich and the List Thank for your  continue support,

We are still  seeing a index issues with memberof plugging, we  are 
not sure at this point if this is related to our software or the 
plugin cfg  behavior, I see 2 entries files.db4 for memberof plugin  
see bellow, is this correct?
the 389-admin GUI shows only the memberof indexed, when I try to 
check for index corruption and run


-rw--- 1 ldap-ds ldap-ds   4005888 Oct 20 13:01 memberOf.db4
--rw--- 1 ldap-ds ldap-ds   3915776 Nov 23 07:58 memberof.db4


That's very bad.  I thought we fixed that case issue with db files a 
long time ago.




when I try to check for index values and use either  memberof  or 
memberOf files for the following attribute fails, what I am missing?



   dbscan -f /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ldap/db/userRoot/memberof.db4
  -k "dc=xxx,dc=com"
  Can't find key 'dc=xxx,dc=com'



Not sure.  Try doing dbscan -f 
/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-ldap/db/userRoot/memberof.db4 first, to see what 
the keys look like
I think all the keys have a prefix indicating presence, substr or 
equality, so it should ne more likely "=dc=xxx,dc=com"




same for


  memberOf.db4 file







Thank you
Isabella

On 11/10/2015 11:12 AM, ghiureai wrote:

Rich, thank you for all support  for last day , unfortunately there is a
strong wave in developers team:" the multimaster replication is creating
issues with UI"  ( I do not  totally agree since  can not  be reproduce+
full describe the issues).
Is been decided to moved down to master slave,  please I need to know if
I still need to  exclude member of plugin from replication in this case ?



Thanks a lot
Isabella
   On 11/10/2015 09:23 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:

On 11/10/2015 10:14 AM, Adrian Damian wrote:

Rich,

Thanks for your help. Let me jump in with more details.

We've seen index corruption on a number of occasions. It seems to
affect searchable attributes for which there are indexes. Queries on
an attribute in LDAP that used to work suddenly stopped working. They
would return incomplete results and no results at all, although the
data on the server was the same. The fix on those situations was to
drop the index corresponding to the attribute and re-create it.

So in this case, you have some sort of LDAP search client, and you are
doing a search for '(indexed_attribute=known_value)' and you are not
seeing a result, and this is what you mean by "index corruption"?

Are you aware of the dbscan tool?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Configuration_Command_and_File_Reference/dbscan.html

This tool allows you to examine the index file in the database directly.

dbscan -f
/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-instance_name/db/userRoot/indexed_attribute.db4 -k
known_value

This will allow you to look at the indexed_attribute index directly for
the value "known_value".


We've run the db fix script that the LDAP distribution comes with

What db fix script?  Do you have a link to it, or a link to the product
documentation for the script?


and there are no reports of corruption when this problem occurs. That
makes it very hard to detect. We don't know what else to look for when
we run into this again and more importantly, we don't know what
triggers it and how to prevent it.

Mind you we are currently doing active development changing both the
software clients that access the LDAP servers as well as the
configurations of the servers. It is possible to had been written to
both masters in the master replication configuration when the problem
occurred but because there were multiple clients concurrently
accessing the servers it is hard to figure out what triggered the issue.


Adrian



On 11/09/2015 05:06 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:

On 11/09/2015 05:47 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote:

Hi Rich,
Thank you for your feedback , as always greatly appreciate when
comes from  389-DS RH support.
We are  not using vm just plain hardware, here is the description
I  got from developers team related to the issues they are seeing
when running   integration tests with multimaster replication :
"index corruption: put content, run tests: OK, do more stuff (reads,
writes, etc), ru tests: FAIL, notice "missing attributes", rebuild
index(ices), run tests: OK. "

What does this mean?  What program is printing these index corruption
messages?  Is it some tool provided by Red Hat?


Unfortunately, I understood  this cases/issue can not be reproduce
on regular basis,  no mode details can be provide at this time

All reads and writes are going to  only the master replication DS,
not slave .
  I totally agree with your this is the way to cfg and maintain
Directory  Server in a operation critical  env: multmaster
replication only one master for writes.
 Here is the DS version:
 rpm -qa | grep 389-ds
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-34.el6_5.x86_64

Re: [Fedora 23] Installing KDE Plasma as a second Desktop Environment! [bug]

2015-11-24 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan 
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 09:41 +, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 November 2015 00:07:00 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 19:23 +, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > > I must be missing the point here, but I have always found that
> > > after
> > > installing multiple desktops and leaving gdm as the login
> > > manager,
> > > when you
> > > are asked for the password on login there is a little gear cog
> > > icon
> > > which if
> > > you click on brings up a menu of the different desktops you have
> > > installed -
> > > for instance I have CDE, GNOME, KDE .
> > 
> > You're confusing Desktop Environment (DE) with Desktop Manager
> > (DM).
> > The DM handles the graphical login and other session stuff,
> > including
> > allowing you to select your DE, but the various DMs (gdm, kdm,
> > sddm,
> > ...) have slightly different capabilities.
> > 
> > poc
> I know that - but thats the problem! most people assume that in order
> to 
> change DE youi have to change DM!
> The "slightly different capabilities" you describe are so slight as
> make the 
> whole idea of using multiple DMs a pointless exercise.

Not so. As I think I mentioned once already, I changed from SDDM back
to KDM because the former doesn't support automatically opening gnome-
keyring on login. This is not a crippling failure, but it is a real
annoyance.

poc
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [RESOLVED] Fedora mirror speed's are low!

2015-11-24 Thread Kevin J. Cummings 
On 11/22/2015 06:17 PM, Andrei Amuraritei wrote:
> I have deltarpm=false because it's on by default and it's annoying for
> me at least. I have bandwidth to use, so if deltarpm is enabled I spend
> more time rebuilding with drpms than actually downloading the full rpms.

I agree!  I too turn off deltaRPMs.  Maybe my CPUs are too slow?

> Andrei Amuraritei

-- 
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/)
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unusual notice -

2015-11-24 Thread Bob Goodwin 

On 11/23/15 19:10, Gordon Messmer wrote:

On 11/23/2015 01:54 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Can anyone explain what has caused this? 


The unmodified message, including headers, might be more helpful.

As best I can tell, a mail server for "wildblue.net" tried to deliver 
a message for recipient "bobgoodwin@" to an external address.  Maybe 
that address is forwarded.  Or the MX is not the host that contains 
the mailboxes.  Either way, the destination server issued a temporary 
failure notice during the delivery attempt.  Check the logs on the 
host at 64.234.55.143 for more information about the temp fail.

--

.

There is very little more in the header than what I sent and I received 
another different but equally vague message this morning. I would expect 
the time offset to be -600 perhaps, not +900 and both appear to be 
designed to encourage running alarge attachment 'attachment.com"


The source shows them sent from:


X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.



This is probably off-topic for this list anyway and I think I will just 
filter them to Thunderbird Junk and forget it.


Thanks,

Bob

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-23/64bit LINUX XFCE POP3

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fedora 23] Installing KDE Plasma as a second Desktop Environment! [bug]

2015-11-24 Thread Andrew R Paterson 
On Tuesday 24 November 2015 00:07:00 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 19:23 +, Andrew R Paterson wrote:
> > I must be missing the point here, but I have always found that after
> > installing multiple desktops and leaving gdm as the login manager,
> > when you
> > are asked for the password on login there is a little gear cog icon
> > which if
> > you click on brings up a menu of the different desktops you have
> > installed -
> > for instance I have CDE, GNOME, KDE .
> 
> You're confusing Desktop Environment (DE) with Desktop Manager (DM).
> The DM handles the graphical login and other session stuff, including
> allowing you to select your DE, but the various DMs (gdm, kdm, sddm,
> ...) have slightly different capabilities.
> 
> poc
I know that - but thats the problem! most people assume that in order to 
change DE youi have to change DM!
The "slightly different capabilities" you describe are so slight as make the 
whole idea of using multiple DMs a pointless exercise.
Andy
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: No login for mailman3

2015-11-24 Thread Robert Nichols 

On 11/23/2015 10:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:41:18 -0600
Robert Nichols  wrote:


According to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailman3_Migration#Logins_and_passwords
management of my fedoraproject.org subscriptions now requires a login
on Fedora's persona/openid server, and "You can login and manage your
settings right away."  I have never had such a login.  How can I
manage my subscriptions?


You can either:

1. Make a fedora acount:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/new
login with it, and then click on 'add email address' and confirm your
other address. Then you can manage things with it.

2. Use the persona login link and enter your address there.
You can then manage things once you login.


OK, I created a fedoraproject.org account and logged in, but I don't
see any "add email address" anywhere.  Do I have to agree to the
legalese in the FPCA just to manage my mailing list subscriptions?

Where do I find this "persona login link"?  From what I can find via
search engines, it's going to want my @fedoraproject.org email address,
and that is _not_ going to link to my existing mailing list
subscriptions.

--
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Speaking of black screens

2015-11-24 Thread Richard Shaw 
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Tom Horsley  wrote:

> The screen then goes black (or dark gray, anyway) and
> the mouse pointer can move, but nothing else happens.
> I've waited two or three minutes with no change.
>
> I decide to go to a console screen and see what is
> running, so I hit Ctrl-Alt-F2.
>
> Boom! I instantly get a gnome3 desktop. If I do
> Ctrl-Alt-F1, the desktop is still there.


I'm seeing almost the same thing on F22 w/ kernel 4.2.6. When I login I do
get a desktop but I tried going to a VT with Ctl-Alt-F2, nothing, so I I go
to VT3 which works. Then I hit Ctl-Alt-F1 and I get the GDM login screen
again! I log in again. Curious, I then  went back to VT3 and could get the
desktop on VT2 and GDM on VT1.

Strange.

Thanks,
Richard
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Speaking of black screens

2015-11-24 Thread Tom Horsley 
I did some more experiments on my system, and it appears to
be gdm that is screwed up. When I switch to kdm, all my
problems with X session weirdness go away.

With gdm, I saw two completely separate X sessions
running in a 'ps'. One as user 42 (gdm) was running on vt1
and the other as my login user was running on vt2.

I'm guessing the black screen is vt1 showing me nothing,
and when I Ctrl-Alt-F2 I get the session running as me.

I have no clue why gdm is doing this, but my plan is
to stick with kdm (which I always switch to for other reasons
anyway, like being able to turn off the nolisten tcp
option).
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org