Re: Mini DisplayPort not quite working with latest Kernel

[Frederic Muller]

On 09/14/2016 09:56 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I use a X1 Carbon 3rd gen and since the latest kernel update (maybe a
> week ago) the Mini DisplayPort does not work when connected at startup.
> Sometimes I can indeed connected my external monitor once I log in and
> it works, sometimes I have to boot with the previous kernel. I haven't
> troubleshooted much but was wondering if it was just me, or other were
> seeing the same behavior.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Fred
> 

Hi!

Not sure whether my post made it to the list. Got a new kernel yesterday
and same problem occurs. Any hint?

Thanks

Fred
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: cups - the printer is not responding

[Tim]

Allegedly, on or about 14 September 2016, Angelo Moreschini sent:
> I read that I can indicate the IP of the client in the file cupsd.conf
> on the server.
> 
> And there I put  :
> -
> 
>   # Allow remote access...
>   Order allow,deny
>   Allow all
> 
> 
> 
> I put there "Allow all", because I am not sure about which concrete IP
> address of client to write  because the IP addresses are assigned
> (from DHCP) dynamically,  and I find  different values  evry time the
> computer start.. 

Access to root is supposed to be restricted, subsequent rules in the
config file relax access to other parts of the CUPS server.

There are other places that you may need to allow access, such as CUPS
server and client through the firewall.  Perhaps SELinux permissions,
too.

But none of this has anything to do with resolving the IP, and none of
what you mentioned in that message about indicating client IP.

Before you get around to finding out why a client isn't working, you
should get the printer working with the server (the one the printer is
directly dealing with).  Use the print a test page feature.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64

Boilerplate:  All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is
no point trying to privately email me, I only get to see the messages
posted to the mailing list.

- Mwuu haha ha h, soon the world will be mine!
- Sir, you've got to take your finger off the intercom button.


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.3 and module nvidia

[Fred Smith]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:56:19AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/14/16 23:39, François Patte wrote:
> > Thanks for answering. No errors in the log file. I tried to load the
> > nvidia module using modprobe and the answer was the same: FATAL module
> > nvidia not found (while it is in the right directory)
> >
> > So I run depmod -a and the problem is solved, but this does not explain
> > why akmod did not run (or failed to run) depmod after building the module.
> 
> In addition to what others have said, make sure you have both 
> akmods-shutdown.service and
> akmods.service enabled.  I've found that having both enabled will catch 
> improperly
> installed kmods.
> 
> The one thing to realize is that, unfortunately, you don't get an indication 
> they are
> running either at boot time or shutdown time.  So, you may think you have 
> have a hung
> system when they are doing their work. 

I've been fooled by that in the past, not with systemd, either, but
on Centos 6, or so, when after a virtualbox update the system can
take five mins during boot with a blank screen to do whatever it is
doing with kmod and virtualbox.


-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
   "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged 
   sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; 
  it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart."  
 Hebrews 4:12 (niv) --
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Odd DNF output

[Ian Pilcher]

On 09/14/2016 01:28 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:

Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which
this output makes sense.


I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it
drops them from the attempt.


But why is it trying to include them in the first place?  There are no
older versions of those packages installed, and they're not dependencies
of the packages that are being updated.

--

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com
 "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" 

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.3 and module nvidia

[Ed Greshko]

On 09/14/16 23:39, François Patte wrote:
> Thanks for answering. No errors in the log file. I tried to load the
> nvidia module using modprobe and the answer was the same: FATAL module
> nvidia not found (while it is in the right directory)
>
> So I run depmod -a and the problem is solved, but this does not explain
> why akmod did not run (or failed to run) depmod after building the module.

In addition to what others have said, make sure you have both 
akmods-shutdown.service and
akmods.service enabled.  I've found that having both enabled will catch 
improperly
installed kmods.

The one thing to realize is that, unfortunately, you don't get an indication 
they are
running either at boot time or shutdown time.  So, you may think you have have 
a hung
system when they are doing their work. 

-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Odd DNF output

[Honza Silhan]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Samuel Sieb  wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which
>> this output makes sense.
>>
> I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it
> drops them from the attempt.

"--best" should always pull them in the highest version.

It seems more like bug in DNF if the upgrade set is the same with
switches and without. Can you please report the bug and attach the
debugdata [1] for transaction with "--best --allowerasing" and without
them?

Thanks.
Honza

[1] 
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Bug-Reporting#dependency-resolution-problem
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: VPN connection failed because service stopped

[Joe Zeff]

On 09/14/2016 12:09 PM, Paul Smith wrote:

Thanks, Mike and Joe!


Glad to be able to help.  Remember, when in doubt, RTFM.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: VPN connection failed because service stopped

[Paul Smith]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Mike Wright
 wrote:
>
> I was able to connect to a vpn server (PPTP) with no difficulties. But
> now, I get always the following message:
>
> "VPN connection failed because service stopped".
>
> From a MS Windows machine, I can connect to the referred vpn server.
>
> Could someone please help me?


 The following log may help you:
>>>
>>>
>>> The problem was related to the firewall, although I had not changed
>>> anything in the firewall.
>>>
>>> The following (done as root) fixed the problem:
>>>
>>> firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter INPUT 0 -p gre -j ACCEPT
>>> firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv6 filter INPUT 0 -p gre -j ACCEPT
>>> firewall-cmd --reload
>>
>>
>> How to make permanent these changes on the firewall?
>
>
> firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent

Thanks, Mike and Joe!

Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: VPN connection failed because service stopped

[Mike Wright]

On 09/14/2016 11:28 AM, Paul Smith wrote:

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Paul Smith  wrote:


I was able to connect to a vpn server (PPTP) with no difficulties. But
now, I get always the following message:

"VPN connection failed because service stopped".

From a MS Windows machine, I can connect to the referred vpn server.

Could someone please help me?


The following log may help you:


The problem was related to the firewall, although I had not changed
anything in the firewall.

The following (done as root) fixed the problem:

firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter INPUT 0 -p gre -j ACCEPT
firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv6 filter INPUT 0 -p gre -j ACCEPT
firewall-cmd --reload


How to make permanent these changes on the firewall?


firewall-cmd --runtime-to-permanent
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: VPN connection failed because service stopped

[Joe Zeff]

On 09/14/2016 11:28 AM, Paul Smith wrote:

How to make permanent these changes on the firewall?


Here's a quote from the man page:

--runtime-to-permanent
Save active runtime configuration and overwrite permanent
configuration with it. The way this is supposed to work is that
when configuring firewalld you do runtime changes only and once
you're happy with the configuration and you tested that it works
the way you want, you save the configuration to disk.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: VPN connection failed because service stopped

[Paul Smith]

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Paul Smith  wrote:
>>>
>>> I was able to connect to a vpn server (PPTP) with no difficulties. But
>>> now, I get always the following message:
>>>
>>> "VPN connection failed because service stopped".
>>>
>>> From a MS Windows machine, I can connect to the referred vpn server.
>>>
>>> Could someone please help me?
>>
>> The following log may help you:
>
> The problem was related to the firewall, although I had not changed
> anything in the firewall.
>
> The following (done as root) fixed the problem:
>
> firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter INPUT 0 -p gre -j ACCEPT
> firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv6 filter INPUT 0 -p gre -j ACCEPT
> firewall-cmd --reload

How to make permanent these changes on the firewall?

Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Odd DNF output

[Samuel Sieb]

On 09/14/2016 10:40 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:

Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which
this output makes sense.

I would assume that means dnf can't find any way to resolve those, so it 
drops them from the attempt.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Odd DNF output

[Ian Pilcher]

On 09/14/2016 03:51 AM, Honza Silhan wrote:

please try what Samuel suggests (add "--best --allowerasing"). It
should pull in these packages but will remove/downgrade some packages
currently on your system. (proceed only if you want to)


After updating a bunch of unrelated packages, to simplify the output,
here is what I am seeing:

[pilcher@ian ~]$ sudo dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:42 ago on Wed Sep 14 12:21:12 2016.
Dependencies resolved.

 Package  Arch Version 
Repository Size


Upgrading:
 gnupgx86_64   1.4.21-1.fc23 
updates   1.3 M
 gnupg2   x86_64   2.1.13-2.fc23 
updates   1.9 M
 gnutls   x86_64   3.4.15-1.fc23 
updates   663 k
 gnutls-dane  x86_64   3.4.15-1.fc23 
updates39 k
 gnutls-utils x86_64   3.4.15-1.fc23 
updates   267 k
 libguestfs   x86_64   1:1.32.10-1.fc23 
updates   1.9 M
 libguestfs-tools-c   x86_64   1:1.32.10-1.fc23 
updates   3.4 M

Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
 gnupg2-smime x86_64   2.1.13-2.fc23 
updates   406 k
 libguestfs-xfs   x86_64   1:1.32.10-1.fc23 
updates19 k
 pinentry x86_64   0.9.6-4.fc23 
updates81 k
 trousers x86_64   0.3.13-5.fc23 
fedora151 k
 trousers-lib x86_64   0.3.13-5.fc23 
fedora158 k


Transaction Summary

Upgrade  7 Packages
Skip 5 Packages

Total download size: 9.4 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n
Operation aborted.
[pilcher@ian ~]$ sudo dnf update --best --allowerasing
Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:57 ago on Wed Sep 14 12:21:12 2016.
Dependencies resolved.

 Package  Arch Version 
Repository Size


Upgrading:
 gnupgx86_64   1.4.21-1.fc23 
updates   1.3 M
 gnupg2   x86_64   2.1.13-2.fc23 
updates   1.9 M
 gnutls   x86_64   3.4.15-1.fc23 
updates   663 k
 gnutls-dane  x86_64   3.4.15-1.fc23 
updates39 k
 gnutls-utils x86_64   3.4.15-1.fc23 
updates   267 k
 libguestfs   x86_64   1:1.32.10-1.fc23 
updates   1.9 M
 libguestfs-tools-c   x86_64   1:1.32.10-1.fc23 
updates   3.4 M


Transaction Summary

Upgrade  7 Packages

Total download size: 9.4 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n
Operation aborted.

Maybe I'm being stupid, but I cannot come up with a scenario in which
this output makes sense.

--

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com
 "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" 

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.3 and module nvidia

[Tom Horsley]

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:49:25 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:

> I would recommend you don't reboot too soon after
> a kernel update.

Yea, I always run "top" and wait till I see no more
dnf,rpm,cc1,depmod,etc. running before a reboot.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.3 and module nvidia

[Richard Shaw]

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:39 AM, François Patte <
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:

> Thanks for answering. No errors in the log file. I tried to load the
> nvidia module using modprobe and the answer was the same: FATAL module
> nvidia not found (while it is in the right directory)
>
> So I run depmod -a and the problem is solved, but this does not explain
> why akmod did not run (or failed to run) depmod after building the module.


The akmod utility doesn't run depmod. All it does is build the RPM based on
the new kernel and installs the resultant RPM.

I've run into the occasional issue similar to yours. I haven't been able to
figure out the cause but I would recommend you don't reboot too soon after
a kernel update. Akmod has to install the RPM after the previous update is
complete and the rpmdb lock removed. It may take longer than you think. If
it gets stopped after a certain point the utility may think everything is
done when the package scriptlets haven't been run yet. This is purely a
guess though.

In my case, the fix for me was to remove the built RPMs and re-run akmod, I
didn't even think to try running depmod.

Thanks,
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.3 and module nvidia

[François Patte]

Le 14/09/2016 16:31, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 09/14/16 20:29, François Patte wrote:
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> I updated my f24 this morning: a new kernel is provided and using the
>> akmod-nvidia, X won't start
>>
>> I logged on console and tried startx but it failed with this message:
>>
>> FATAL: nvidia module not found in /lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.fc24.x86_64
>>
>> Of course, the nvidia module is in
>> /lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.../extra/nvidia-340xx
>>
>> Exactly like for the previous kernel (4.7.2)
>>
>> I copied the nvidia.ko in /lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.fc24.x86_64 but,
>> startx failed with the same message which is a lack of honesty!
>>
>> What happens?
> 
> I just updated my laptop which also uses the nvidia-340xx drivers from 
> rpmfusion.
> 
> It booted just fine.  I use KDE and sddm as my display manager and it came up 
> as expected.
> 
> Check /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log for any errors.

Thanks for answering. No errors in the log file. I tried to load the
nvidia module using modprobe and the answer was the same: FATAL module
nvidia not found (while it is in the right directory)

So I run depmod -a and the problem is solved, but this does not explain
why akmod did not run (or failed to run) depmod after building the module.


-- 
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: OT: what does this expression mean?

[Todd Zullinger]

c...@zip.com.au wrote:

On 13Sep2016 16:54, todd zullinger  wrote:
While we're at it, I might suggest that "${f%.mp4}.mp3" isn't as 
clear as "${f/.mp4/.mp3}" for this particular for loop.


I think that's a little subjective; I personally prefer the former.


You say that like code is expressive subject to the whims of 
individual personalities. ;)


The pattern substitution method ${parameter/pattern/string} will 
also look more familiar to anyone who has used s/pattern/subst/ in 
vim, perl, etc, which is a small bonus.


for f in *.mp4; do
ffmpeg -i "$f" -c:a libmp3lame "${f/.mp4/.mp3}";
done


Yeah, until you try to make it robust. Eg against a filename like 
"temp4-take9.mp4", which your example will transmute into 
"temp3-take9.mp4", not quite the plan. Whereas the "f%.mp4" thing 
will behave correctly because of the greedy match.


While I would use /% to be safe, this particular example wouldn't 
break without /% because while this ${parameter/pattern/string} syntax 
looks like perl, sed, or vim's s/// syntax which all take regular 
expressions, bash's does not.


   $ f="temp4-take9.mp4"; echo "${f/.mp4/.mp3}"
   temp4-take9.mp3

versus

   $ f="t.mp4-take9.mp4"; echo "${f/.mp4/.mp3}"
   t.mp3-take9.mp4

I tend to feel that glob-based things are better than regexp based 
things for filename work, most of the time. Globs are simpler 
(albeit less powerful) patterns and shorter and more readable and 
often more intuitive. (When they're enough.)


Well said.

I try to avoid being too clever in any sort of coding.  That helps for 
scripts I don't edit frequently and for code which others need to 
maintain with me.  There's nothing like scratching your head and 
having to read your own code 3 times to figure out what it was doing.


(I think this is a big part of why I moved from perl to python years 
ago.  Perl is wonderful but it seems to encourage -- or perhaps just 
doesn't discourage -- clever idioms.  That and I hate having to type 
all the sigils and semicolons. ;)


Thanks to all for the question and discussion.  I enjoy diversions 
like this.  I nearly always pick up some new technique and interesting 
points of view.


--
Todd
~~
We hold that what one man cannot morally do, a million men cannot
morally do, and government, representing many millions of men, cannot
do.
   -- Auberon Herbert



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.3 and module nvidia

[Ed Greshko]

On 09/14/16 20:29, François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I updated my f24 this morning: a new kernel is provided and using the
> akmod-nvidia, X won't start
>
> I logged on console and tried startx but it failed with this message:
>
> FATAL: nvidia module not found in /lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.fc24.x86_64
>
> Of course, the nvidia module is in
> /lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.../extra/nvidia-340xx
>
> Exactly like for the previous kernel (4.7.2)
>
> I copied the nvidia.ko in /lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.fc24.x86_64 but,
> startx failed with the same message which is a lack of honesty!
>
> What happens?

I just updated my laptop which also uses the nvidia-340xx drivers from 
rpmfusion.

It booted just fine.  I use KDE and sddm as my display manager and it came up 
as expected.

Check /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log for any errors.

-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: cups - the printer is not responding

[Angelo Moreschini]

I correct myself:

*I can see the printer, that is connected to computer server, inside the
web browser of the computer client at localhost:631.*

I read that I can indicate the IP of the client in the file cupsd.conf on
the server.
And there I put  :
-

  # Allow remote access...
  Order allow,deny
  Allow all


I put there "Allow all", because I am not sure about which concrete IP
address of client to write  because the IP addresses are assigned (from
DHCP) dynamically,  and I find  different values  evry time the computer
start..


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Angelo Moreschini <
mrangelo.fed...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a network printer (that I can see on the computer server browser at
> localhost:631).
> When I try to use it,  the jobs are  not processed... - and I get the
> message
>  * " the printer is not responding".*
>
> I fund this information at link ;
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CUPS/Troubleshooting#All_jobs_are_.
> 22The_printer_is_not_responding.22
>
> -
> All jobs are "The printer is not responding"
>
> On networked printers, you should check that the name that CUPS uses as
> its connection URI resolves to the printer's IP via DNS, e.g. If your
> printer's connection looks like this:
>
> lpd://BRN_020554/BINARY_P1
>
> then the hostname 'BRN_020554' needs to resolve to the printer's IP from
> the server running CUPS
> 
>
> I understand what this means...
> but I don't know how to accomplice the task*: *
>* resolve that the IP from the server running CUPS
> *
>
> Any help to do this will be appreciated.
>
> Thank you
>
> Angelo
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.3 and module nvidia

[Tom Horsley]

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:29:35 +0200
François Patte wrote:

> I updated my f24 this morning: a new kernel is provided and using the
> akmod-nvidia, X won't start

I updated to 4.7.3 on two systems today with akmod-nvidia from rpmfusion and
both are working fine, so it isn't a probably everyone is having. My
modules are in /lib/modules/4.7.3-200.fc24.x86_64/extra/nvidia/

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root69224 Sep 14 07:16 nvidia-drm.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15672776 Sep 14 07:16 nvidia.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1046976 Sep 14 07:16 nvidia-modeset.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1279504 Sep 14 07:16 nvidia-uvm.ko

you could try running akmods --force to get it to rebuild, maybe
something didn't work the first time.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

kernel 4.7.3 and module nvidia

[François Patte]

Bonjour,

I updated my f24 this morning: a new kernel is provided and using the
akmod-nvidia, X won't start

I logged on console and tried startx but it failed with this message:

FATAL: nvidia module not found in /lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.fc24.x86_64

Of course, the nvidia module is in
/lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.../extra/nvidia-340xx

Exactly like for the previous kernel (4.7.2)

I copied the nvidia.ko in /lib/modules/4.7.3.-200.fc24.x86_64 but,
startx failed with the same message which is a lack of honesty!

What happens?

Thank you.

-- 
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.2 update broke bind

[Tom Horsley]

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:47:28 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:

> But why even bother  
> mapping anything. I would think that accessing an unmapped region would  
> result in a SIGSEGV just as well.

Ah-HA! A question I can answer :-).

You need to map something because otherwise the program itself
might have code to map something of its own and unless you reserve
the protected space, it might wind up becoming unprotected.

I also see a new 4.7.3 kernel showed up in the repos. I wonder
if the problem goes away with it?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: cups - the printer is not responding

[Tim]

Allegedly, on or about 14 September 2016, Angelo Moreschini sent:
> lpd://BRN_020554/BINARY_P1
> 
> then the hostname 'BRN_020554' needs to resolve to the printer's IP
> from the server running CUPS
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I understand what this means... 
> but I don't know how to accomplice the task: 
>  resolve that the IP from the server running CUPS
> 
> 
> Any help to do this will be appreciated. 

If you have a DNS server, then enter the hostname and numerical IP
address into the DNS records (systems using DHCP should do this for you,
if they were to work properly, but they usually don't).

If you don't, then you can put it into your /etc/hosts file.  Have a
look at it, or the hosts man file, to see how it's written.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64

Boilerplate:  All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is
no point trying to privately email me, I only get to see the messages
posted to the mailing list.

Sorry, I don't have any viruses to send in the mail. Please destroy some
of your own files, yourself.


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: nedit

[Ed Greshko]

On 09/14/16 17:22, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> The issue is only with nedit (on 2 computers at least).
> numlock on or off, I cannot have the numbers.

I don't use nedit.  But I can confirm that the keypad works in F22 but not in 
F24.

Suggest you file a bugzilla

-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.2 update broke bind

[Sam Varshavchik]

Tom Horsley writes:


On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:05:18 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:

> [heap]
>  7  7fa2a000-7fa2a0085000  532.00 Kb rw-p  00:00 0
>  8  7fa2a0085000-7fa2a40065004.00 Kb ---p  00:00 0
>  9  7fa2a800-7fa2a806f000  444.00 Kb rw-p  00:00 0
> 10  7fa2a806f000-7fa2ac0065092.00 Kb ---p  00:00 0

That looks like someone is doing heap protection by putting a inaccessible
section between each allocated heap chunk. There might be glibc malloc
debugging trigger of some kind to do that, but I wouldn't think
that would change just for the kernel version, so I'm out of ideas.


I recall that ElectricFence did something like that. But why even bother  
mapping anything. I would think that accessing an unmapped region would  
result in a SIGSEGV just as well.


pgpihFZ0tLXTQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: nedit

[Patrick Dupre]

Hello,

The issue is only with nedit (on 2 computers at least).
numlock on or off, I cannot have the numbers.

Thank.

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===


> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 2:15 AM
> From: "Samuel Sieb" 
> To: "Community support for Fedora users" 
> Subject: Re: nedit
>
> On 09/13/2016 02:20 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > After an update to fc24, I lost the numerical keyboard with nedit
> > on 2 computers.
> > Could you confirm this glitch ?
> >
> Assuming you mean the number pad, is your numlock on?  Do those keys 
> work in any other app or is it just nedit that doesn't work?
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: kernel 4.7.2 update broke bind

[Tom Horsley]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 22:05:18 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:

> [heap]
>  7  7fa2a000-7fa2a0085000  532.00 Kb rw-p  00:00 0
>  8  7fa2a0085000-7fa2a40065004.00 Kb ---p  00:00 0
>  9  7fa2a800-7fa2a806f000  444.00 Kb rw-p  00:00 0
> 10  7fa2a806f000-7fa2ac0065092.00 Kb ---p  00:00 0

That looks like someone is doing heap protection by putting a inaccessible
section between each allocated heap chunk. There might be glibc malloc
debugging trigger of some kind to do that, but I wouldn't think
that would change just for the kernel version, so I'm out of ideas.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Odd DNF output

[Honza Silhan]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Samuel Sieb  wrote:
> On 09/13/2016 06:33 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>
>> The odd thing is that none of the "problematic" packages --
>> gnupg2-smime, libguestfs-xfs, pinentry -- are installed.

the same it's written in summary that these package will be skipped
(not upgraded). There are probably some conflicts between packages on
your system or missing dependencies of not upgraded packages.

>> I have install_weak_deps=false in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf, so it shouldn't be
>> trying to install weak dependencies.

It has nothing to do with weak deps.

>> Anyone know what the heck DNF is trying to do?
>>
> Have you tried to add those options and see what dnf would try to do in that
> case?

please try what Samuel suggests (add "--best --allowerasing"). It
should pull in these packages but will remove/downgrade some packages
currently on your system. (proceed only if you want to)


Honza
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

cups - the printer is not responding

[Angelo Moreschini]

Hi,

I have a network printer (that I can see on the computer server browser at
localhost:631).
When I try to use it,  the jobs are  not processed... - and I get the
message
 * " the printer is not responding".*

I fund this information at link ;
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CUPS/Troubleshooting#All_jobs_are_.22The_printer_is_not_responding.22

-
All jobs are "The printer is not responding"

On networked printers, you should check that the name that CUPS uses as its
connection URI resolves to the printer's IP via DNS, e.g. If your printer's
connection looks like this:

lpd://BRN_020554/BINARY_P1

then the hostname 'BRN_020554' needs to resolve to the printer's IP from
the server running CUPS


I understand what this means...
but I don't know how to accomplice the task*: *
   * resolve that the IP from the server running CUPS *

Any help to do this will be appreciated.

Thank you

Angelo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] Re: Strange behaviour password sync , windows 2012 r2

[Juan Carlos Camargo]

Any ideas on this issue?







2016-09-02 9:47 GMT+02:00 Juan Carlos Camargo :

> I've been troubleshooting this issue.
> Reinstalled password sync, certificates , verified those certificates. And
> the sync started working, the sync user was able to check the remote
> password.
> Today, again, it's back: Binding with the user returns error 53 :(
>
> 09/02/16 09:32:12: Attempting to sync password for juankar
> 09/02/16 09:32:12: Searching for (ntuserdomainid=juankar)
> 09/02/16 09:32:12: Checking password failed for remote entry:
> uid=juankar,ou=x
> 09/02/16 09:32:12: Deferring password change for juankar
>
> and the ldap server is responding with error 53:
>
> [02/Sep/2016:09:32:12 +0200] conn=36 op=0 BIND dn="uid=juankar,xxx"
> method=128 version=3
> [02/Sep/2016:09:32:12 +0200] conn=36 op=0 RESULT err=53 tag=97 nentries=0
> etime=0
>
> With ldp , from the affected windows 2012 server and connecting to the
> involved ldap server, using ssl I get no errors at all:
>
> res = ldap_simple_bind_s(ld, 'uid=juankar,xx', ); // v.3
> Authenticated as: 'uid=juankar,ou=sistemas,ou=ep
> rinsa,ou=usuarios,dc=metaeprinsa,dc=org'.
>
> Going crazy.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2016-08-30 8:44 GMT+02:00 Juan Carlos Camargo :
>
>> Thank you both for your answers.
>> Sorry I should've included more lines in my log.
>> Bindings with the passSync user are ok. But after that, the system tries
>> to bind with the user whose password is being changed and that's when it
>> fails:
>>
>> This is what happens when user jmml01 changes his password in Windows and
>> he was connected to the failing controller:
>>
>> Windows:
>>
>> 08/30/16 08:28:56: Attempting to sync password for jmml01
>> 08/30/16 08:28:56: Searching for (ntuserdomainid=jmml01)
>> 08/30/16 08:28:56: Checking password failed for remote entry:
>> uid=jmml01,ou=xxx
>> 08/30/16 08:28:56: Deferring password change for jmml01
>> 08/30/16 08:28:56: Backing off for 4096000ms
>>
>> 389ds:
>>
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=262 fd=66 slot=66 SSL connection from
>> A.B.C.D to A1.B1.C1.D1
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=262 TLS1.2 256-bit AES
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=262 op=0 BIND
>> dn="uid=winsync,ou=xx" method=128 version=3
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=262 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0
>> etime=0 dn="uid=winsync,ou=x"
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=262 op=1 SRCH base="ou=usuarios,ou=xxx"
>> scope=2 filter="(ntUserDomainId=jmml01)" attrs=ALL
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=262 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>> nentries=1 etime=0
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=263 fd=67 slot=67 SSL connection from
>> A.B.C.D to A1.B1.C1.D1
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=263 TLS1.2 256-bit AES
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=263 op=0 BIND dn="uid=jmml01,ou=x"
>> method=128 version=3
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=263 op=0 RESULT err=53 tag=97
>> nentries=0 etime=0
>> [30/Aug/2016:08:28:56 +0200] conn=263 op=1 UNBIND
>>
>> However if the user was connected on the other controller, the password
>> will be successfully changed. I also believe it's a certificate problem ,
>> I'm going to review my config on that side.
>>
>> Regards!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-08-29 20:24 GMT+02:00 Noriko Hosoi :
>>
>>> On 08/29/2016 02:48 AM, Juan Carlos Camargo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, 389ds'ers,
>>>
>>> I have two 2012 r2 domain controllers with passsync 1.6 x64 installed.
>>> They're both targeting 389-ds-base-1.3.4.9-1.fc22.x86_64 . They're
>>> working flawlessly.
>>> I dont know if it's been a software update or a change in the domain
>>> settings. Thing is today, one of the controllers has stopped sync'ing.
>>>
>>> Could there be a certificate issue?  Did you have any chance to check
>>> the cert with the tool certutil?
>>>
>>> Also, if you could try binding as the user "uid=juankar,ou=xxx"
>>> using an ldap command over SSL, you may be able to get more info, e.g.,
>>> returned from the server.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Whenever I change one password in that controller, the following message
>>> is logged in passsync.log:
>>>
>>> 08/29/16 11:30:07: Password list has 1 entries
>>> 08/29/16 11:30:07: Attempting to sync password for juankar
>>> 08/29/16 11:30:07: Searching for (ntuserdomainid=juankar)
>>> 08/29/16 11:30:07: Checking password failed for remote entry:
>>> uid=juankar,ou=xxx
>>> 08/29/16 11:30:07: Deferring password change for juankar
>>>
>>> and in the server access log I get ldap bind err=53 when the passsync
>>> user tries to check the password:
>>>
>>> [29/Aug/2016:11:30:07 +0200] conn=276 fd=67 slot=67 SSL connection from
>>> 
>>> [29/Aug/2016:11:30:07 +0200] conn=276 TLS1.2 128-bit AES
>>> [29/Aug/2016:11:30:07 +0200] conn=276 op=0 BIND
>>> dn="uid=juankar,ou=xxx" method=128 version=3
>>> [29/Aug/2016:11:30:07 +0200] conn=276 op=0 RESULT err=53 tag=97
>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>> [29/Aug/2016:11:30:07 +0200] conn=276 op=1 UNBIND