Re: stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 11/22/21 22:04, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 23/11/2021 13:46, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 11/22/21 21:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Pulseaudio has support for sending to airplay(2).  You need to load 
the raop(2) module and your airplay devices should show up as 
potential outputs.  Pipewire just got preliminary support about a 
week ago, so it will probably be in the next release.


Pulseaudio documentation for the raop modules is at:
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Documentation/User/Modules/#raopsinkmoduleswirelessnetworksoundakaappleairtunes 



I don't know where the actual module is though.  I can't find which 
package it comes in.  Maybe it's disabled in Fedora?


The link above specifies PulseAudio.  Is that equivalent to what 
pipewire would supply?


All I know is what I saw in the gitlab issue I linked in the previous email.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko 

On 23/11/2021 13:46, Samuel Sieb wrote:

On 11/22/21 21:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:

Pulseaudio has support for sending to airplay(2).  You need to load the raop(2) 
module and your airplay devices should show up as potential outputs.  Pipewire 
just got preliminary support about a week ago, so it will probably be in the 
next release.


Pulseaudio documentation for the raop modules is at:
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Documentation/User/Modules/#raopsinkmoduleswirelessnetworksoundakaappleairtunes

I don't know where the actual module is though.  I can't find which package it 
comes in.  Maybe it's disabled in Fedora?


The link above specifies PulseAudio.  Is that equivalent to what pipewire would 
supply?

--
Did 황준호 die?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 11/22/21 21:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Pulseaudio has support for sending to airplay(2).  You need to load the 
raop(2) module and your airplay devices should show up as potential 
outputs.  Pipewire just got preliminary support about a week ago, so it 
will probably be in the next release.


Pulseaudio documentation for the raop modules is at:
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Documentation/User/Modules/#raopsinkmoduleswirelessnetworksoundakaappleairtunes

I don't know where the actual module is though.  I can't find which 
package it comes in.  Maybe it's disabled in Fedora?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 11/22/21 14:06, SternData wrote:
I see a bunch of tools that let my desktop act as an airplay receiver, 
but I'm having no google-fun finding a tool that lets use my Sonos 
system as speakers for the desktop.


Pulseaudio has support for sending to airplay(2).  You need to load the 
raop(2) module and your airplay devices should show up as potential 
outputs.  Pipewire just got preliminary support about a week ago, so it 
will probably be in the next release.


https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues/1542
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: WiFi reconnecting periodically after upgrade to F35

2021-11-22 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 11/22/21 19:09, Scott Talbert wrote:

On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 02:36:12 -
Scott Talbert wrote:


I think it is actually the router being "helpful". My router serves
DHCP and allows me to set up permanent assignments of IP <=> MAC,
so the first time I connect a new device, I always do that, and the
IP doesn't change on me. I had a lot of weird wifi connection
problems till the latest router firmware update, now they are
very few and far between. (Though when I notice them, I still have
to fix things by rebooting the router).


That's a fair point - maybe if I configured my router similarly I would not 
notice the connections dropping.  I still would like to stop the frequency 
switching though.


The frequency shifting shouldn't be a problem.  It really shouldn't even 
be noticeable.  It's strange that your router is giving out different IP 
addresses on the different channels.  If you fix that, you'll be fine.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: WiFi reconnecting periodically after upgrade to F35

2021-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko 

On 23/11/2021 10:36, Scott Talbert wrote:

Roger, you hit the nail on the head.  After reviewing a bunch of old logs, it 
seems that I've been having intermittent connection drops for a while (i.e., 
while still on F34).  Previously, it seems it would just reconnect on 5 GHz - 
the change in F35 is that it now toggles between 5 and 2.5 and when it does, it 
changes my IP address, so I definitely notice.

What decides to switch frequencies - is that wpa_supplicant?  NetworkManager?


What router do you have?  Most allow for DHCP reservations which will keep the 
same IP address even when the band
changes.  Or, you can manually set your IP address which is out of the range 
the DHCP server supplies.  This will also
keep the same IP address.

This is what I do, and all my devices (phones, tablets, etc.) move seamlessly 
between bands as they move around our home.
Never a loss of connections.

--
Did 황준호 die?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: WiFi reconnecting periodically after upgrade to F35

2021-11-22 Thread Mike Wright 

On 11/22/21 7:09 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:

On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 02:36:12 -
Scott Talbert wrote:


I think it is actually the router being "helpful". My router serves
DHCP and allows me to set up permanent assignments of IP <=> MAC,
so the first time I connect a new device, I always do that, and the
IP doesn't change on me. I had a lot of weird wifi connection
problems till the latest router firmware update, now they are
very few and far between. (Though when I notice them, I still have
to fix things by rebooting the router).


That's a fair point - maybe if I configured my router similarly I would not 
notice the connections dropping.  I still would like to stop the frequency 
switching though.


My router has the ability to disable/enable the low/high frequency 
transceivers individually.  If yours has that capability you could 
consider that.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server 2.0.11

2021-11-22 Thread Mark Reynolds 


   389 Directory Server 2.0.11

The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-ds-base version 
2.0.11


Fedora packages are available on Fedora 34 and Rawhide

Rawhide:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=79178995 
- Koji


Fedora 35:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=79181056 
- Koji


https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-dcccb24c55 
- Bodhi


Fedora 34:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=79181078 
- Koji


https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fd5fe50a28 
- Bodhi


The new packages and versions are:

 * 389-ds-base-2.0.11-1

Source tarballs are available for download atDownload 389-ds-base Source 




 Highlights in 2.0.11

 * Bug fixes
 * CockpitUI-LDAPeditor (database editor) has been started, but it is
   far from complete. Please do not file any issues against it yet as
   it’s a WIP.


 Installation and Upgrade

SeeDownload for 
information about setting up your yum repositories.


To install the server use*dnf install 389-ds-base*

To install the CockpitUIplugin use*dnf install cockpit-389-ds*

After rpm install completes, run*dscreate interactive*

For upgrades, simply install the package. There are no further 
steps required.


There are no upgrade steps besides installing the new rpms

SeeInstall_Guide 
for 
more information about the initial installation and setup


SeeSource 
for 
information about source tarballs andSCM(git) access.



 Feedback

We are very interested in your feedback!

Please provide feedback and comments to the 389-users mailing 
list:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users.lists.fedoraproject.org


If you find a bug, or would like to see a new feature, file it in our 
GitHub project:https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base


 * Bump version to 2.0.11
 * Issue 4962 - Fix variousUIbugs - Settings and Monitor (#5016)
 * Issue 5014 -UI- Add group creation toLDAP editor
 * Issue 5006 -UI-LDAPeditor tree not being properly updated
 * Issue 5001 - UpdateCItest for new availableSASLMechs attribute
 * Issue 4959 - Invalid /etc/hosts setup can cause isLocalHost to fail.
 * Issue 5001 - Fix next round ofUI bugs:
 * Issue 4962 - Fix variousUIbugs - dsctl and ciphers (#5000)
 * Issue 4978 - use more portable python command for checking containers
 * Issue 4678 -RFEautomatique disable of virtual attribute checking (#4918)
 * Issue 4972 - gecos withIA5introduces a compatibility issue with
   previous (#4981)
 * Issue 4978 - make installer robust
 * Issue 4976 - Failure
   in suites/import/import_test.py::test_fast_slow_import
 * Issue 4973 - update snmp to use /run/dirsrv forPID file
 * Issue 4962 - Fix variousUIbugs - Plugins (#4969)
 * Issue 4973 - installer changes permissions on /run
 * Issue 4092 - systemd-tmpfiles warnings
 * Issue 4956 - Automember allows invalid regex, and does not log
   proper error
 * Issue 4731 - Promoting/demoting a replica can crash the server
 * Issue 4962 - Fix variousUIbugs part 1
 * Issue 3584 - Fix PBKDF2_SHA256hashing inFIPSmode (#4949)
 * Issue 4943 - Fix csn generator to limit time skew drift (#4946)
 * Issue 2790 - Set db home directory by default
 * Issue 4299 - MergeLDAPeditor code into Cockpit UI
 * Issue 4938 - max_failure_count can be reached in dscontainer on slow
   machine with missing debug exception trace
 * Issue 4921 - logconv.pl -j: Use of uninitialized value (#4922)
 * Issue 4847 -BUG- potential deadlock in replica (#4936)
 * Issue 4513 - fixACICItests involving ip/hostname rules
 * Issue 4925 - PerformanceACI: targetfilter evaluation result can be
   reused (#4926)
 * Issue 4916 - Memory leak in ldap-agent

--
Directory Server Development Team
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: WiFi reconnecting periodically after upgrade to F35

2021-11-22 Thread Scott Talbert 
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 02:36:12 -
> Scott Talbert wrote:
> 
> 
> I think it is actually the router being "helpful". My router serves
> DHCP and allows me to set up permanent assignments of IP <=> MAC,
> so the first time I connect a new device, I always do that, and the
> IP doesn't change on me. I had a lot of weird wifi connection
> problems till the latest router firmware update, now they are
> very few and far between. (Though when I notice them, I still have
> to fix things by rebooting the router).

That's a fair point - maybe if I configured my router similarly I would not 
notice the connections dropping.  I still would like to stop the frequency 
switching though.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: WiFi reconnecting periodically after upgrade to F35

2021-11-22 Thread Tom Horsley 
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 02:36:12 -
Scott Talbert wrote:

> What decides to switch frequencies - is that wpa_supplicant?  NetworkManager?

I think it is actually the router being "helpful". My router serves
DHCP and allows me to set up permanent assignments of IP <=> MAC,
so the first time I connect a new device, I always do that, and the
IP doesn't change on me. I had a lot of weird wifi connection
problems till the latest router firmware update, now they are
very few and far between. (Though when I notice them, I still have
to fix things by rebooting the router).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: WiFi reconnecting periodically after upgrade to F35

2021-11-22 Thread Scott Talbert 
Roger, you hit the nail on the head.  After reviewing a bunch of old logs, it 
seems that I've been having intermittent connection drops for a while (i.e., 
while still on F34).  Previously, it seems it would just reconnect on 5 GHz - 
the change in F35 is that it now toggles between 5 and 2.5 and when it does, it 
changes my IP address, so I definitely notice.

What decides to switch frequencies - is that wpa_supplicant?  NetworkManager?

> It may be that prior it switched down to 2.4ghz it stayed there.  And
> that the change is every so often it tries to now go back to the
> higher bandwidth one.
> 
> I know that on a single router, the 2.4Ghz signal has significantly
> better range and is more reliable so any weakness in the 5ghz signal
> from obstructions would cause you to switch to the 2.4.
> 
> I used to have my wifi randomly drop on 5ghz and not even seem to
> reconnect at all to anything (so much I had a script that ping the gw
> and if not pingable or really slow restarted the connection but
> eventually I just disabled 5ghz to maintain stability), but after
> replacing the card with a newer intel AX200 wifi card it got much more
> stable and stays on the 5ghz band.
> 
> 5ghz is tricky especially apparently with the older wifi cards, and it
> also seems to be worse depending on how new of technology  the router
> has.
> 
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:36 AM Scott Talbert  wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/19/21 00:17, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > >
> > > Given those MAC addresses, that's a quite likely scenario.  The question
> > > is still why are things getting disconnected and those logs are not
> > > suitable for answering that question.  It looks like dmesg output,
> > > journalctl output would be much better.
> >
> > So yeah, my AP has both 2.5 GHz and 5 GHz radios, both with the same SSID.  
> > So it
> seems my Fedora laptop is toggling between the two bands.  74:83:c2:03:5e:61 
> is the 2.5
> GHz and 7a:83:c2:04:5e:61 is the 5 GHz.
> >
> > I'll provide the journalctl logs later.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Scott
> > ___
> > users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko 

On 23/11/2021 08:07, Tim Evans wrote:

On 11/22/21 18:59, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 11/22/21 3:36 PM, Tim Evans wrote:


exclude=akmod-nvidia


Why do you want to exclude that if you have an akmod-nvidia package installed?  
Don't you want to get updates?


As we have been discussing, older Nvidia cards aren't supported with current 
drivers included in F35.  Downgrading needed, and exclusion to prevent 
overwriting the supported drivers with newer ones.



Actually, the exclude was needed when the akmod-nvidia-340xx package was in the 
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.  Without the
exclude the akmod-nvidia-340xx would get downgraded to the broken version.

I just removed the exclude from my configuration which confirms the package was 
moved to stable.

And a check on a system without nvidia hardware.

[root@f35k ~]# dnf list available | grep akmod-nvidia-340xx
akmod-nvidia-340xx.x86_64 1:340.108-15.fc35 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates

Which is the "fixed" version for the newer kernels.


--
Did 황준호 die?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Tim Evans 

On 11/22/21 18:59, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 11/22/21 3:36 PM, Tim Evans wrote:


exclude=akmod-nvidia

Why do you want to exclude that if you have an akmod-nvidia package 
installed?  Don't you want to get updates?


As we have been discussing, older Nvidia cards aren't supported with 
current drivers included in F35.  Downgrading needed, and exclusion to 
prevent overwriting the supported drivers with newer ones.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Tim Evans 

On 11/22/21 17:42, Ed Greshko wrote:

If akmod-nvidia-340xx installed and works.  Check 
/var/cache/akmods/akmods.log for output such as


All good.



It would be

exclude=akmod-nvidia-340xx


Great, thanks.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Joe Zeff 

On 11/22/21 3:36 PM, Tim Evans wrote:


exclude=akmod-nvidia

Why do you want to exclude that if you have an akmod-nvidia package 
installed?  Don't you want to get updates?

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread Greg Woods 
Depending on which Sonos device you have, it may have a LINE IN port, in
which case you could connect that to the output of your sound card.

--Greg


On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:06 PM SternData 
wrote:

> I see a bunch of tools that let my desktop act as an airplay receiver,
> but I'm having no google-fun finding a tool that lets use my Sonos
> system as speakers for the desktop.
>
> Ideas?
>
> --
> -- Steve
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread George N. White III 
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 18:06, SternData 
wrote:

> I see a bunch of tools that let my desktop act as an airplay receiver,
> but I'm having no google-fun finding a tool that lets use my Sonos
> system as speakers for the desktop.
>

My house has Sonos S1 gear.  Sonos is known for streaming audio over wifi.
There are
linux audio servers that claim to work with Sonos <
https://github.com/muammar/mkchromecast/tree/fedora>, but the sound will be
delayed, so it is pretty
limited to streaming recorded content, e.g, not games.  Sonos does have
sound bars and portable bluetooth speakers that can get audio directly from
a local source.

-- 
George N. White III
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko 

On 23/11/2021 06:36, Tim Evans wrote:

On 11/22/21 16:47, Ed Greshko wrote:


GeForce GT 730 is supported by akmod-nvidia-340xx.

I am not sure if this has been pushed to rpmfusion-nonfree.  But the version 
that works with the newer kernels is nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-15.fc35.

You may have to "dnf --enablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing install 
akmod-nvidia-340xx".  And, you may have to
edit your dnf.conf to exclude this package from updates for the time being or 
it will get downgraded.  Suggest you test without
enabling the testing repo to see if the correct version is installed.


Thanks.  370/395 removed and 340xx installed.  Most of those removed 
dependencies got re-installed with it.


If akmod-nvidia-340xx installed and works.  Check /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log 
for output such as

2021/11/21 17:24:43 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 5.14.18-300.fc35.x86_64
2021/11/21 17:24:43 akmods: Building and installing nvidia-340xx-kmod
2021/11/21 17:24:43 akmods: Building RPM using the command '/sbin/akmodsbuild 
--kernels 5.14.18-300.fc35.x86_64 /usr/src/akmods/nvidia-340xx-kmod.latest'
2021/11/21 17:26:52 akmods: Installing newly built rpms
2021/11/21 17:26:52 akmods: DNF detected
2021/11/21 17:27:15 akmods: Successful.

Then there is no need for an exlcude.

But, for completeness




Not sure about syntax of dnf.conf exclude:

# cat dnf.conf
[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonly_limit=3
clean_requirements_on_remove=True
best=False
skip_if_unavailable=True
exclude=akmod-nvidia

Does it need a wildcard? Just "nvidia"?



It would be

exclude=akmod-nvidia-340xx

--
Did 황준호 die?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread SternData 
Yes.  They say it must they work with Airplay2.  So, I'm looking for a 
way to do that.


On 11/22/21 4:39 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 11/22/21 3:06 PM, SternData wrote:
I see a bunch of tools that let my desktop act as an airplay receiver, 
but I'm having no google-fun finding a tool that lets use my Sonos 
system as speakers for the desktop.


Have you asked Sonos about this?


___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread Joe Zeff 

On 11/22/21 3:06 PM, SternData wrote:
I see a bunch of tools that let my desktop act as an airplay receiver, 
but I'm having no google-fun finding a tool that lets use my Sonos 
system as speakers for the desktop.


Have you asked Sonos about this?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Tim Evans 

On 11/22/21 16:47, Ed Greshko wrote:


GeForce GT 730 is supported by akmod-nvidia-340xx.

I am not sure if this has been pushed to rpmfusion-nonfree.  But the 
version that works with the newer kernels is 
nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-15.fc35.


You may have to "dnf --enablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing 
install akmod-nvidia-340xx".  And, you may have to
edit your dnf.conf to exclude this package from updates for the time 
being or it will get downgraded.  Suggest you test without

enabling the testing repo to see if the correct version is installed.


Thanks.  370/395 removed and 340xx installed.  Most of those removed 
dependencies got re-installed with it.


Not sure about syntax of dnf.conf exclude:

# cat dnf.conf
[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonly_limit=3
clean_requirements_on_remove=True
best=False
skip_if_unavailable=True
exclude=akmod-nvidia

Does it need a wildcard? Just "nvidia"?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

stream TO airplay/sonos

2021-11-22 Thread SternData 
I see a bunch of tools that let my desktop act as an airplay receiver, 
but I'm having no google-fun finding a tool that lets use my Sonos 
system as speakers for the desktop.


Ideas?

--
-- Steve
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread John Pilkington 

On 22/11/2021 19:52, Tim Evans wrote:

On 11/13/21 11:10, Ed Greshko wrote:


To switch back to nouveau, just "dnf erase akmod-nvidia-39xx".

This will revert the changes to the linux boot parameters.


# dnf remove akmod-nvidia-470.74-1.fc35.x86_64
Dependencies resolved.
 


  Package Arch   Version Repository     Size
 


Removing:
  akmod-nvidia    x86_64 3:470.74-1.fc35 @rpmfusion-nonfree 
     22 k

Removing unused dependencies:
  akmods  noarch 0.5.6-28.fc35   @fedora     37 k
  debugedit   x86_64 5.0-2.fc35  @fedora    190 k
  fakeroot    x86_64 1.26-4.fc35 @updates    152 k
  fakeroot-libs   x86_64 1.26-4.fc35 @updates    133 k
  http-parser x86_64 2.9.4-5.fc35    @fedora    100 k
  kmodtool    noarch 1-43.fc35   @fedora     18 k
  koji    noarch 1.26.1-1.fc35   @updates    712 k
  libgit2 x86_64 1.1.0-5.fc35    @fedora    1.1 M
  python3-gssapi  x86_64 1.6.14-2.fc35   @fedora    1.9 M
  python3-koji    noarch 1.26.1-1.fc35   @updates    1.5 M
  python3-progressbar2    noarch 3.53.2-2.fc35   @fedora    208 k
  python3-pygit2  x86_64 1.6.1-1.fc35    @fedora    860 k
  python3-requests-gssapi noarch 1.2.3-3.fc35    @fedora     54 k
  python3-rpmautospec noarch 0.2.5-1.fc35    @fedora     74 k
  python3-utils   noarch 2.5.6-3.fc35    @fedora    798 k
  rpm-build   x86_64 4.17.0-1.fc35   @fedora    142 k
  rpmdevtools noarch 9.5-2.fc35  @fedora    219 k
  xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc x86_64 3:495.44-4.fc35 
@rpmfusion-nonfree-updates


     26 M
  zstd    x86_64 1.5.0-2.fc35    @fedora    1.9 M

Transaction Summary
 


Remove  20 Packages

Freed space: 36 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n

Looks like a lot of stuff to be removed.

The 4.95 version that came down with FC35 does not support my GeForce GT 
730.  Did a dnf downgrade to version 470.x, but that's not working with 
F35 kernel--auto-fallback to Nouveau. And, as noted this looks like a 
lot of stuff to be removed to get rid of the driver altogether. Stuff 
looks a little flaky--Thunderbird came up in a window the size of a 
postage stamp, but maximizing it made it ok.


Advice? Thanks.


Here's the obvious 'official' link.  I'm not sure how much of it you 
need to read...


https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA#Uninstall_the_NVIDIA_driver
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 11/22/21 11:52, Tim Evans wrote:

# dnf remove akmod-nvidia-470.74-1.fc35.x86_64
Dependencies resolved.
 


  Package Arch   Version Repository     Size
 


Removing:
  akmod-nvidia    x86_64 3:470.74-1.fc35 @rpmfusion-nonfree 
     22 k

Removing unused dependencies:
  akmods  noarch 0.5.6-28.fc35   @fedora     37 k

[snip]


Transaction Summary
 


Remove  20 Packages

Freed space: 36 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n

Looks like a lot of stuff to be removed.
"Removing unused dependencies".  You can disable that by adding 
"--noautoremove" to the dnf command line if you want.

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko 

On 23/11/2021 03:52, Tim Evans wrote:

On 11/13/21 11:10, Ed Greshko wrote:


To switch back to nouveau, just "dnf erase akmod-nvidia-39xx".

This will revert the changes to the linux boot parameters.


# dnf remove akmod-nvidia-470.74-1.fc35.x86_64
Dependencies resolved.

 Package Arch   Version Repository Size

Removing:
 akmod-nvidia    x86_64 3:470.74-1.fc35 @rpmfusion-nonfree     22 k
Removing unused dependencies:
 akmods  noarch 0.5.6-28.fc35   @fedora     37 k
 debugedit   x86_64 5.0-2.fc35  @fedora    190 k
 fakeroot    x86_64 1.26-4.fc35 @updates 152 k
 fakeroot-libs   x86_64 1.26-4.fc35 @updates 133 k
 http-parser x86_64 2.9.4-5.fc35    @fedora    100 k
 kmodtool    noarch 1-43.fc35   @fedora     18 k
 koji    noarch 1.26.1-1.fc35   @updates 712 k
 libgit2 x86_64 1.1.0-5.fc35    @fedora    1.1 M
 python3-gssapi  x86_64 1.6.14-2.fc35   @fedora    1.9 M
 python3-koji    noarch 1.26.1-1.fc35   @updates 1.5 M
 python3-progressbar2    noarch 3.53.2-2.fc35   @fedora    208 k
 python3-pygit2  x86_64 1.6.1-1.fc35    @fedora    860 k
 python3-requests-gssapi noarch 1.2.3-3.fc35    @fedora     54 k
 python3-rpmautospec noarch 0.2.5-1.fc35    @fedora     74 k
 python3-utils   noarch 2.5.6-3.fc35    @fedora    798 k
 rpm-build   x86_64 4.17.0-1.fc35   @fedora    142 k
 rpmdevtools noarch 9.5-2.fc35  @fedora    219 k
 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc x86_64 3:495.44-4.fc35 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates

    26 M
 zstd    x86_64 1.5.0-2.fc35    @fedora    1.9 M

Transaction Summary

Remove  20 Packages

Freed space: 36 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n

Looks like a lot of stuff to be removed.


That's about right.  No other packages on your system depend on those packages, 
so they will get removed.



The 4.95 version that came down with FC35 does not support my GeForce GT 730.  
Did a dnf downgrade to version 470.x, but that's not working with F35 
kernel--auto-fallback to Nouveau. And, as noted this looks like a lot of stuff 
to be removed to get rid of the driver altogether. Stuff looks a little 
flaky--Thunderbird came up in a window the size of a postage stamp, but 
maximizing it made it ok.

Advice? Thanks. 


GeForce GT 730 is supported by akmod-nvidia-340xx.

I am not sure if this has been pushed to rpmfusion-nonfree.  But the version 
that works with the newer kernels is nvidia-340xx-kmod-340.108-15.fc35.

You may have to "dnf --enablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing install 
akmod-nvidia-340xx".  And, you may have to
edit your dnf.conf to exclude this package from updates for the time being or 
it will get downgraded.  Suggest you test without
enabling the testing repo to see if the correct version is installed.



--

Did 황준호 die?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: NVIDIA Legacy drivers

2021-11-22 Thread Tim Evans 

On 11/13/21 11:10, Ed Greshko wrote:


To switch back to nouveau, just "dnf erase akmod-nvidia-39xx".

This will revert the changes to the linux boot parameters.


# dnf remove akmod-nvidia-470.74-1.fc35.x86_64
Dependencies resolved.

 Package Arch   Version Repository 
Size


Removing:
 akmod-nvidiax86_64 3:470.74-1.fc35 @rpmfusion-nonfree 
22 k

Removing unused dependencies:
 akmods  noarch 0.5.6-28.fc35   @fedora 
37 k
 debugedit   x86_64 5.0-2.fc35  @fedora 
   190 k
 fakerootx86_64 1.26-4.fc35 @updates 
   152 k
 fakeroot-libs   x86_64 1.26-4.fc35 @updates 
   133 k
 http-parser x86_64 2.9.4-5.fc35@fedora 
   100 k
 kmodtoolnoarch 1-43.fc35   @fedora 
18 k
 kojinoarch 1.26.1-1.fc35   @updates 
   712 k
 libgit2 x86_64 1.1.0-5.fc35@fedora 
   1.1 M
 python3-gssapi  x86_64 1.6.14-2.fc35   @fedora 
   1.9 M
 python3-kojinoarch 1.26.1-1.fc35   @updates 
   1.5 M
 python3-progressbar2noarch 3.53.2-2.fc35   @fedora 
   208 k
 python3-pygit2  x86_64 1.6.1-1.fc35@fedora 
   860 k
 python3-requests-gssapi noarch 1.2.3-3.fc35@fedora 
54 k
 python3-rpmautospec noarch 0.2.5-1.fc35@fedora 
74 k
 python3-utils   noarch 2.5.6-3.fc35@fedora 
   798 k
 rpm-build   x86_64 4.17.0-1.fc35   @fedora 
   142 k
 rpmdevtools noarch 9.5-2.fc35  @fedora 
   219 k
 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc x86_64 3:495.44-4.fc35 
@rpmfusion-nonfree-updates


26 M
 zstdx86_64 1.5.0-2.fc35@fedora 
   1.9 M


Transaction Summary

Remove  20 Packages

Freed space: 36 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n

Looks like a lot of stuff to be removed.

The 4.95 version that came down with FC35 does not support my GeForce GT 
730.  Did a dnf downgrade to version 470.x, but that's not working with 
F35 kernel--auto-fallback to Nouveau. And, as noted this looks like a 
lot of stuff to be removed to get rid of the driver altogether. Stuff 
looks a little flaky--Thunderbird came up in a window the size of a 
postage stamp, but maximizing it made it ok.


Advice? Thanks.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora 35 using XFS as default for Network iso / XFCE?

2021-11-22 Thread Chris Murphy 
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 9:30 AM Ed Greshko  wrote:

> But, never mind, I'll just consider it an oddity.

The particular ISO is what determines the default layout, not the
package set chosen. That's why you can get XFS by default if you use
the Server net install, but choose the Workstation package set. Or
Btrfs if you use Everything netinstall, but choose the Server package
set. I think that's the slightly confusing part is that it ends up
being an attribute of the install media.

The other oddity is that Everything isn't really "owned" by any one
working group or SIG, it's sort of a catch all media, and due to some
esoteric aspects of how images are created it was just a lot easier to
let the Everything netintsaller default to Btrfs. And also it's the
only way to do netinstalls for any of the desktop spins, they don't
each have their own. Workstation once had a netinstaller, but it was
dropped maybe 1/2 dozen releases or so ago.


-- 
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Fedora 35 using XFS as default for Network iso / XFCE?

2021-11-22 Thread Chris Murphy 
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:42 PM Ed Greshko  wrote:
>
> On 21/11/2021 07:09, Peter Boy wrote:
> >
> >> Am 20.11.2021 um 23:14 schrieb Ed Greshko :
> >>
> >> On 21/11/2021 01:10, Doug H. wrote:
> >>> Shortly after the release of Fedora 35 I downloaded:
> >>>
> >>> Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>> I have stated the install and it is currently downloading the packages.
> >>> The interesting part is that I see that it has used XFS instead of
> >>> BTRFS.
> >>>
> >>> Might this be expected?
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >> I installed the Fedora Sever from 
> >> Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-35-1.2.iso.
> >>
> >> …..
> >>
> >> No sign of XFS.
> > The Everything ISOs storage configuration defaults to Workstation.
> >
> > If you use the Server iso you get the „real“ Server that defaults to XFS/LVM
> >
> > Configuration of the filesystem is not part of the package set you choose 
> > from the dvd,  but part of Anaconda configuration which differs between the 
> > various deliverables / isos
>
> Yes.  Sorry to not be clear.  I was just pointing out that depending on the 
> install media you use you'll get different
> disk layouts.  I wonder why the inconsistency is permitted.

Each edition (working group) and spin (special interest group) can
choose their own default layout and filesystem.  For the btrfs by
default change, all the desktop spins were consulted in advance with a
preview of the proposal, to address any concerns they had and how to
opt-out of the change if they wished. All the desktops went with
btrfs.

Server, Cloud, IoT editions were given a heads up, but at the time of
the original proposal for Fedora 33 it wasn't expected any would join
right away anyway.

Fedora 35 Cloud edition switched to Btrfs by default for its images.


-- 
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure