Re: nvidia driver disabled ion F36 upgrade?
On 5/14/22 23:39, Joe Zeff wrote: On 5/15/22 00:17, Samuel Sieb wrote: The akmod still has to compile against the current kernel. If the module source isn't compatible with the new kernel, the compile will fail. If the akmod won't work against the newest kernel, that will be fixed before the kernel is released, because that would be a major show-stopper. Well, that's up to NVidia. Fedora isn't going to delay a kernel release just because a proprietary external kernel module hasn't been updated. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: font longevity questions.
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:07 PM George N. White III wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:35 PM Tom Mitchell wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:21 AM home user wrote: >> > >> > Good morning, >> > >> > I have about 240 microsoft office word 2010 documents, all 9+ years old, .. >> Backup and transfer the fonts you legally own to durable media >> and install them as needed. > > > You rarely "own" fonts. Licenses for commercial fonts may allow backups, > but only for recovery on the system where they were first installed. Thank you for reinforcing this point. Fonts and friends are a fickle tangle. Keep things simple. An old boss could not cope with a text file that did not end in .txt My job was to support the products on an exhaustive list of unix and linux systems (sigh). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nvidia driver disabled ion F36 upgrade?
On 5/15/22 00:17, Samuel Sieb wrote: The akmod still has to compile against the current kernel. If the module source isn't compatible with the new kernel, the compile will fail. If the akmod won't work against the newest kernel, that will be fixed before the kernel is released, because that would be a major show-stopper. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nvidia driver disabled ion F36 upgrade?
On 5/14/22 22:05, Joe Zeff wrote: On 5/14/22 22:08, Samuel Sieb wrote: Maybe the new kernel isn't supported yet. That's only a problem with the kmod, and it's the reason for the akmond. The akmod still has to compile against the current kernel. If the module source isn't compatible with the new kernel, the compile will fail. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nvidia driver disabled ion F36 upgrade?
On 5/14/22 22:08, Samuel Sieb wrote: Maybe the new kernel isn't supported yet. That's only a problem with the kmod, and it's the reason for the akmond. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: nvidia driver disabled ion F36 upgrade?
On 5/14/22 01:15, Barry Scott wrote: I have been using the nvidia driver from rpmfusion on f35 without problem. Just upgraded to F36 and its using nouveau. There is a nvidia-fallback service that ran and did the modprobe nouveau. (Nice that this is here as a fallback) Anyone know why the rpmfusion driver is not automatically loaded after the upgrade? Maybe the new kernel isn't supported yet. Try running "akmods" and see what happens. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fractional scaling in Fedora 36
Tim: >> In my opinion scaling is a bad hack to avoid properly sizing a GUI >> to the current screen resolution and dimensions, and produced >> no end of rendering side effects when I messed with it in the past. Anil Felipe Duggirala: > I don't know what you mean by "end of rendering". "no end of rendering side effects" meaning endless problems. Some things would scale, others would not (bits of the GUI, browsers have their own independent rendering engines, word processors, too). If I'm preparing a document, and want to see it in 1:1 screen rendering so I can see how it'll print. (There are display options in word processors for 1:1, full width, full height, and other magnifications.) I want an A4 page to display at real A4 size on the screen (if I hold a piece of paper next to it, it ought to be nearly identical). If I want to draw a 4 cm by 8 cm rectangle, I want it to appear in those sizes. If I use 12 point text, it actually has to be 12 point text, not something unpredictable. Likewise, if I want to use 20 pixel text to match alongside a 200 by 300 pixel image, I want them both to be using the same pixel size. Centimeters, pixels and points are absolute sizes, *other* sizing schemes are to be used when you want to use relative sizing. Likewise when I'm printing something. I've I've measured something I'm going to print for, and want to produce a 12 by 10 cm box, with so-many lines of 14 point text, I want to edit and print it with those real dimensions. Not play random magnification print, adjust, and retry, games. I've always found that scaling fouled all of that up. It seems no programmer gets that. They probably think 4 inches is huge. In my opinion, when you set screen font sizes (e.g. the body text, the window titles, etc), you should be able to set the size you actually want. And the GUIs should appropriately resize to fit. It should work that simply. The clicky icons ought to be a similar size to your screen font, etc. Having a separate expansion factor to aid people who want large or small icons is a good thing, too. But base the GUI relative to the size of the text you're reading. They've simply gone about it the *wrong* way, in how they've changed the old style of GUI to suit newer tiny, big, and high-resolution screens. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 5 16:57:59 UTC 2022 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: font longevity questions.
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 07:42 -0600, James Szinger wrote: > Try markdown if LaTeX is too complicated. Markdown is a simple, > text-based markup language that can be automatically converted to > other formats, including HTML, LaTeX, PDF, and MS Word. I may have another look at these. I don't particularly have a need, so that does leave time for experimentation. But I've found that converting document formats has always produced garbage. One does something the other does not, so it fakes it by shoehorning content into things where it doesn't belong (the wrong elements), or masses of metadata getting shovelled in. e.g. what was simply something something Gets infiltrated with junk like this: something something The classes weren't necessary, the characters in the classes mean nothing. I would have done no specific styling of elements. I'd have styled any ol inside the header one way, any ol inside the main another way, any ol inside the nav another way, etc. i.e. A simple set of selective CSS rules, not explicit styling except for a few cases, where the class names would actually make sense to me (e.g. "sitebanner"). That tag soup eliminates the prime feature of HTML with CSS that I can simply restyle the website by adjusting the stylesheet (in this case, I can't *simply* adjust the stylesheet, I have to extensively study all the HTML). I even see that class crap shovelled in when I haven't done any styling, I'd just been typing completely plain HTML. Email clients' HTML generators have to be the absolute worst, even worse than wordprocessors for creating that junk. > I don’t grok word processors. Plain text is just as good for simple > documents and WYSIWYG interferes with complicated formatting. Many > of the Word files I get from my colleagues are a mess. I can handle word processors fine, but I don't like fixing other people's documentation. There's a font over here, and another over there, there's no reason for either of them. Correcting one spelling error repaginates several pages, argh! None of them can use punctuation correctly, and they all use them like an electric typewriter, trying to jam things into place with carriage returns and blank lines. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 5 16:57:59 UTC 2022 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fedora-release-35 still installed after 35->36 upgrade
On 5/14/22 14:25, Ian Pilcher wrote: On 5/14/22 15:00, Joe Zeff wrote: I haven't upgraded yet, but you're right about what's happening. Instead of checking the contents of /etc/fedora-release, it just checks to see which version is installed. If, for some reason, the older version isn't removed from the database, it will see it first and assume that's the version of Fedora you're using. Just remove the older version (which isn't really installed anyway) and you're good to go. On further examination, I had a whole bunch of duplicate packages in the RPM database. It looks as if none of the old FC35 packages were removed from the database during the upgrade. Very odd. That sounds like something failed during the upgrade. Can you check the logs? There's a system-upgrade command that finds the right logs for you. "dnf system-upgrade log" ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fedora-release-35 still installed after 35->36 upgrade
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 16:25 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 5/14/22 15:00, Joe Zeff wrote: > > I haven't upgraded yet, but you're right about what's happening. > > Instead > > of checking the contents of /etc/fedora-release, it just checks to > > see > > which version is installed. If, for some reason, the older version > > isn't removed from the database, it will see it first and assume > > that's > > the version of Fedora you're using. Just remove the older version > > (which isn't really installed anyway) and you're good to go. > > On further examination, I had a whole bunch of duplicate packages in > the > RPM database. It looks as if none of the old FC35 packages were > removed > from the database during the upgrade. Very odd. > > Fortunately, 'dnf reinstall --allowerasing `rpm -qa | grep fc36`' > seems > to have cleaned things up. You can find duplicates with this (from the Release Notes): $ sudo dnf repoquery --duplicates poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: font longevity questions.
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 07:42 -0600, James Szinger wrote: > I don’t grok word processors. Plain text is just as good for simple > documents and WYSIWYG interferes with complicated formatting. Many > of the Word files I get from my colleagues are a mess. To paraphrase Brian Kernighan: WYSIWYG means "What You See Is ALL You Get". poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fedora-release-35 still installed after 35->36 upgrade
On 5/14/22 15:00, Joe Zeff wrote: I haven't upgraded yet, but you're right about what's happening. Instead of checking the contents of /etc/fedora-release, it just checks to see which version is installed. If, for some reason, the older version isn't removed from the database, it will see it first and assume that's the version of Fedora you're using. Just remove the older version (which isn't really installed anyway) and you're good to go. On further examination, I had a whole bunch of duplicate packages in the RPM database. It looks as if none of the old FC35 packages were removed from the database during the upgrade. Very odd. Fortunately, 'dnf reinstall --allowerasing `rpm -qa | grep fc36`' seems to have cleaned things up. -- Google Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fedora-release-35 still installed after 35->36 upgrade
On 5/14/22 12:25, Ian Pilcher wrote: I just noticed that my newly upgraded system is still checking the Fedora 35 repos when I run 'dnf update'. Not confirmed yet, but I suspect it's because I still have fedora-release-35 installed. $ rpm -q fedora-release fedora-release-35-36.noarch fedora-release-36-17.noarch Anyone else seen this? I haven't upgraded yet, but you're right about what's happening. Instead of checking the contents of /etc/fedora-release, it just checks to see which version is installed. If, for some reason, the older version isn't removed from the database, it will see it first and assume that's the version of Fedora you're using. Just remove the older version (which isn't really installed anyway) and you're good to go. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
tor browser with flatpak - ?
Hi guys. Anybody here uses tor browser flatpak version? I'm looking for a way to make such tor browser read/honor 'torrc' config. thanks, L. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
fedora-release-35 still installed after 35->36 upgrade
I just noticed that my newly upgraded system is still checking the Fedora 35 repos when I run 'dnf update'. Not confirmed yet, but I suspect it's because I still have fedora-release-35 installed. $ rpm -q fedora-release fedora-release-35-36.noarch fedora-release-36-17.noarch Anyone else seen this? -- Google Where SkyNet meets Idiocracy ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: font longevity questions.
On Sat, 14 May 2022 11:21:32 +0930 Tim via users wrote: > On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 07:48 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > I'd briefly looked at LaTex, decided it was more pain that is worth > for *me* to learn, but lots of people provide that same advice. > Having been down the road, before, of using proprietary word proc doc > formats that couldn't be used elsewhere, I see the value of well > defined and universal document formats. And it is a format that > print publishers could handle, if your documents were heading that > way. Try markdown if LaTeX is too complicated. Markdown is a simple, text-based markup language that can be automatically converted to other formats, including HTML, LaTeX, PDF, and MS Word. It is amenable to version control since it is text-base; it is the preferred documentation format for GitHub and GitLab. Markdown syntax is simple enough for a person to read and write after quick introduction. I have been using LaTeX for decades and have designed several document classes. Markdown is better for most of my documents, unless I need a publication quality PDF with advance formatting. I don’t grok word processors. Plain text is just as good for simple documents and WYSIWYG interferes with complicated formatting. Many of the Word files I get from my colleagues are a mess. Jim P.S. This e-mail is an example of markdown. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fractional scaling in Fedora 36
On 14/05/2022 13:38, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: On Sat, May 14 2022 at 11:33:17 AM +0930, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 08:47 -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: My questions: 1. Is there another way to enable fractional scaling? (Gnome and Wayland) In my opinion scaling is a bad hack to avoid properly sizing a GUI to the current screen resolution and dimensions, and produced no end of rendering side effects when I messed with it in the past. Hello Tim. I don't know what you mean by "end of rendering". "no end of" means "very many" or "a lot of" :-) Have you tried simply setting appropriate font sizes? That is what Ive done so far. I installed gnome-tweaks and set the font "scaling factor" to 1.20. And chose appropriate font size in apps like CLion. I will continue to play with fonts to see if that works. My eyesight is not the best right now. My screen is scaled at 200% at this point. Using no scaling would be impossible I think. This is a 4k resolution on a 15 inch screen. thank you, ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
F36
Have now upgraded two laplotps one desktop from F35 -- F36. Smooth, quick, perfect. No hickups. Thank you guys!! Jarmo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: fractional scaling in Fedora 36
On Sat, May 14 2022 at 11:33:17 AM +0930, Tim via users wrote: On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 08:47 -0500, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: My questions: 1. Is there another way to enable fractional scaling? (Gnome and Wayland) In my opinion scaling is a bad hack to avoid properly sizing a GUI to the current screen resolution and dimensions, and produced no end of rendering side effects when I messed with it in the past. Hello Tim. I don't know what you mean by "end of rendering". Have you tried simply setting appropriate font sizes? That is what Ive done so far. I installed gnome-tweaks and set the font "scaling factor" to 1.20. And chose appropriate font size in apps like CLion. I will continue to play with fonts to see if that works. My eyesight is not the best right now. My screen is scaled at 200% at this point. Using no scaling would be impossible I think. This is a 4k resolution on a 15 inch screen. thank you, ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: First 5 minutes with f36
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 00:45 +, olivares33561 via users wrote: > I am running Gnome and had a command in ~/.bash_profile to compose > setxkbmap -compose ralt key > > to put a ñ I used ~ and n but it does not work anymore :(. What is > the magic incantanation? I am using Tom's technique copy paste from > web browser. But if I can use a compose key strategy, it would be > appreciated if there is a how-to and independent of which desktop one > uses. I use dead keys for diacriticals: áéíóúüñ. It's just a keyboard layout selection. I only use the Compose key for ¿ and !. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: font longevity questions.
On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 11:21 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > I'd briefly looked at LaTex, decided it was more pain that is worth > for *me* to learn, but lots of people provide that same advice. > Having been down the road, before, of using proprietary word proc doc > formats that couldn't be used elsewhere, I see the value of well > defined and universal document formats. And it is a format that > print publishers could handle, if your documents were heading that > way. You might be interested in Overleaf: https://www.overleaf.com/ poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
nvidia driver disabled ion F36 upgrade?
I have been using the nvidia driver from rpmfusion on f35 without problem. Just upgraded to F36 and its using nouveau. There is a nvidia-fallback service that ran and did the modprobe nouveau. (Nice that this is here as a fallback) Anyone know why the rpmfusion driver is not automatically loaded after the upgrade? Barry ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure