DeviceDisappeared event detected on md device at boot time
Bonjour, I am wondering what does mean this message at boot time: at the end the md device is correctly mounted. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: change the default dns on fedora 40
Le 2024-07-23 15:35, Barry a écrit : On 23 Jul 2024, at 13:33, François Patte wrote: What did I miss? Not sure. But the output of systemctl status systemd-resolved.service resolvectl status would be interesting to see. Global Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS +DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=yes/supported resolv.conf mode: stub Current DNS Server: 80.67.169.40#ns1.fdn.fr DNS Servers: 80.67.169.12#ns0.fdn.fr 2001:910:800::12#ns0.fdn.fr 80.67.169.40#ns1.fdn.fr 2001:910:800::40#ns1.fdn.fr Link 2 (eno1) Current Scopes: DNS LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6 Protocols: +DefaultRoute LLMNR=resolve -mDNS +DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=yes/supported Current DNS Server: 192.168.1.1 DNS Servers: 192.168.1.1 2a01:cb14:81da:2800:3649:5bff:fe29:3ce0 fe80::3649:5bff:fe29:3ce0 DNS Domain: home Link 3 (wlp6s0) Current Scopes: none Protocols: -DefaultRoute LLMNR=resolve -mDNS +DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=yes/supported What does it mean? What is this "Link2"? Was systemd-resolved running? If its nit running then check for issues in your .conf. It is running and dig returns an error only for the IP6 2a01:cb14:81da:2800:3649:5bff:fe29:3ce0 -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
change the default dns on fedora 40
Bonjour, I try to change the default dns configured by my ISP on a fedora 40. Once upon a time it was easy: just change the file /etc/resolv.conf now So, according to some information got from the internet, I created a directory /usr/lib/systemd/resolved.conf.d/ then wrote a file in this directory named fdn.conf with: [Resolve] DNS=80.67.169.12#ns0.fdn.fr 2001:910:800::12#ns0.fdn.fr DNSSEC=yes DNSOverTLS=yes and restarted systemd-resolved.service (and NetworkManager), but this does not worked... dig -x 2a01:cb14:81da:2800:3649:5bff:fe29:3ce0 returns: ;; communications error to 127.0.0.53#53: timed out ;; communications error to 127.0.0.53#53: timed out ;; communications error to 127.0.0.53#53: timed out What did I miss? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: nvidia drivers installation
Le 2024-07-14 10:50, François Patte a écrit : Bonjour, According to some howto, it is enough to install akmods-nvidia and reboot. some others tell that we have to generate and install some signature I have secure boot enabled. Is there some how-to explaining with details how to proceed. I'm not very good with efi boot system nor secure boot. I installed the nvidia driver: dnf install akmod-nvidia xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda then I enrolled the new keys for nvidia with mokutil: mokutil --import /tc/pki/akmods/certs/public_key_der rebooted the machine and was promted to give the password I gave for mokutil The boot came without any problem and the nvidia driver was loaded... BUT when I rebooted the machine I got a black screen I could recover editing the kernel command line from the grub splash screen and removed the instructions to blacklist nouveau but now the X-session does not start and I have to log from a console and startx. I would like to restore the behavior of the boot before my attempt to install nvidia driver: what is the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX to start an X session with nouveau driver? Next, I will try to understant what went wrong with the nvidia driver. Any clue? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
nvidia drivers installation
Bonjour, According to some howto, it is enough to install akmods-nvidia and reboot. some others tell that we have to generate and install some signature I have secure boot enabled. Is there some how-to explaining with details how to proceed. I'm not very good with efi boot system nor secure boot. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: different behaviors for anaconda depending on iso files
Le 2024-07-12 19:18, Peter Boy a écrit : Am 11.07.2024 um 16:56 schrieb François Patte : Le 2024-07-10 19:55, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 10:48, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 18:26, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 09:19, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 18:05, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 08:33, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 15:12, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 01:15, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, Bonjour, François, Now, if someone could tell me how to mount an lvm2_member, I will be happy! Indeed, my personnal data are on a disk from the f36 install which is a RAID1 member and an lvm2_member. If I try: mount /dev/sdd2 I get "unknown filesystem linux_raid_member" I can bypass this error typing mount /dev/md5 But the error is now: "unknown filesystem lvm2_member" and I don't know how to bypass this error. When a partition is added manually to a system by mounting the system needs a hint as to what to do. I think what you need here is to activate the LVM member: vgchange -y. If this is to be permanent you would need to use -ay. Little command, tons of options. Man vgchange. I read this on some posts on the internet... but if I do something like this will it change something on this partition making it unusable with the f36 install as the /home partition I want to keep this f36 install untill f40 will be completely configured (because I use it to work!) I do not think it modifies the partition in any way whatsoever. It just advises the o/s what to do with it. OK. I tried and nothing has changed... What can I do! Go Canes, in a reply to me, suggested pvscan|vgscan|lvscan. This is most likely the missing ingredient. Sorry I missed that. No success with pv|vg|lv-scan it is as if this lvm2_member does not exist, except if I want to mount it! I don't know if the following is relevant to your problem (I don't have the full context here), but: LVM defaults have been changed recently. If there is a file in /etc/lvm/devices, all vg…/lv… commands just use those partitions which are listed in that file. All other partitions, specifically those which are new in a system, are not included in the processing. You either have to add the device to that list or use an option in any of those commands. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247872 Thank you! This was helpfull! So, here what I have done: 1- As said in the given bugzilla link, I ran the command "vgimportdevices -a" and the external lvm devices were added to the file /etc/lvm/devices/system.devices 2- Now pvs shows the physical volumes and VG groups. And lvscan shows the added logical volumes as inactive. 3- All that's left to do is: activate them with "vgchange -ay" and a link for every VG is created in /dev/mapper so: "mount /dev/mapper/ /mnt" Thank you so much! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: different behaviors for anaconda depending on iso files
Le 2024-07-10 19:55, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 10:48, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 18:26, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 09:19, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 18:05, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 08:33, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 15:12, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 01:15, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, Bonjour, François, Now, if someone could tell me how to mount an lvm2_member, I will be happy! Indeed, my personnal data are on a disk from the f36 install which is a RAID1 member and an lvm2_member. If I try: mount /dev/sdd2 I get "unknown filesystem linux_raid_member" I can bypass this error typing mount /dev/md5 But the error is now: "unknown filesystem lvm2_member" and I don't know how to bypass this error. When a partition is added manually to a system by mounting the system needs a hint as to what to do. I think what you need here is to activate the LVM member: vgchange -y. If this is to be permanent you would need to use -ay. Little command, tons of options. Man vgchange. I read this on some posts on the internet... but if I do something like this will it change something on this partition making it unusable with the f36 install as the /home partition I want to keep this f36 install untill f40 will be completely configured (because I use it to work!) I do not think it modifies the partition in any way whatsoever. It just advises the o/s what to do with it. OK. I tried and nothing has changed... What can I do! Go Canes, in a reply to me, suggested pvscan|vgscan|lvscan. This is most likely the missing ingredient. Sorry I missed that. No success with pv|vg|lv-scan it is as if this lvm2_member does not exist, except if I want to mount it! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: different behaviors for anaconda depending on iso files
Le 2024-07-10 18:26, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 09:19, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 18:05, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 08:33, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 15:12, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 01:15, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, Bonjour, François, Now, if someone could tell me how to mount an lvm2_member, I will be happy! Indeed, my personnal data are on a disk from the f36 install which is a RAID1 member and an lvm2_member. If I try: mount /dev/sdd2 I get "unknown filesystem linux_raid_member" I can bypass this error typing mount /dev/md5 But the error is now: "unknown filesystem lvm2_member" and I don't know how to bypass this error. When a partition is added manually to a system by mounting the system needs a hint as to what to do. I think what you need here is to activate the LVM member: vgchange -y. If this is to be permanent you would need to use -ay. Little command, tons of options. Man vgchange. I read this on some posts on the internet... but if I do something like this will it change something on this partition making it unusable with the f36 install as the /home partition I want to keep this f36 install untill f40 will be completely configured (because I use it to work!) I do not think it modifies the partition in any way whatsoever. It just advises the o/s what to do with it. OK. I tried and nothing has changed... What can I do! Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: different behaviors for anaconda depending on iso files
Le 2024-07-10 18:05, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 08:33, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-10 15:12, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 01:15, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, Bonjour, François, Now, if someone could tell me how to mount an lvm2_member, I will be happy! Indeed, my personnal data are on a disk from the f36 install which is a RAID1 member and an lvm2_member. If I try: mount /dev/sdd2 I get "unknown filesystem linux_raid_member" I can bypass this error typing mount /dev/md5 But the error is now: "unknown filesystem lvm2_member" and I don't know how to bypass this error. When a partition is added manually to a system by mounting the system needs a hint as to what to do. I think what you need here is to activate the LVM member: vgchange -y. If this is to be permanent you would need to use -ay. Little command, tons of options. Man vgchange. I read this on some posts on the internet... but if I do something like this will it change something on this partition making it unusable with the f36 install as the /home partition I want to keep this f36 install untill f40 will be completely configured (because I use it to work!) Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: different behaviors for anaconda depending on iso files
Le 2024-07-10 15:12, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/10/24 01:15, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, Bonjour, François, Now, if someone could tell me how to mount an lvm2_member, I will be happy! Indeed, my personnal data are on a disk from the f36 install which is a RAID1 member and an lvm2_member. If I try: mount /dev/sdd2 I get "unknown filesystem linux_raid_member" I can bypass this error typing mount /dev/md5 But the error is now: "unknown filesystem lvm2_member" and I don't know how to bypass this error. There are several ways. I detest UUID so I prefer /dev/ entries. /dev/VG_Name/LV_Name or /dev/mapper/VG_Name-LV_Name Thank you for this answer but I have no "VGname" given by the system, so /dev/mapper is empty because, I think, the system considers this disk as an external disk... So the question is: how to mount an external disk comming from another linux install where it was configured with lvm? UUID mount gives the same result: "unknown filesystem lvm2_member". Your persistence is admirable. Thank you! Sometimes it is hard to find answers to questions Maybe windows'users are happier: they cannot configure their install as they wish... I hate windows! Regards. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
different behaviors for anaconda depending on iso files
Bonjour, Trying to install f40 to replace my f36, I wanted to have a RAID1 install as it was the case for f36 (see my other posts). I downloaded Fedora-Server-netinst iso file. None of the partition scheme I tried was approved by anaconda: error was "efi partition cannot be raid_member". So I tried to put the efi partition outside a raid array (say sda1) and the error was that "the device of the boot loader stage2 is on a multi-disk matrix (sda2|sdb2) but not the one of sda1" It is a dumb message because I did not ask for the boot loader be on sda2|sdb2 RAID partition (/ ) but on /boot/efi (sda1). I downloaded Fedora-Workstation-Live iso file. Selected French as the install language and french azerty keyboard The keyboard remained as a qwerty keyboard which is very easy to type a password that you will use with an azerty keyboard. Never mind I could manage... But in my attemps to define a partition scheme, the errors were the same as for the netinst iso file I downloaded the Fedora-Xfce-Live iso file and miracle! I could put the efi boot partition on a raid1 array and at the end it worked! What a waste of time! Who said (and programmed anaconda) that the efi partition cannot be installed on a raid array? Therefore blocking the install of f40. Now, if someone could tell me how to mount an lvm2_member, I will be happy! Indeed, my personnal data are on a disk from the f36 install which is a RAID1 member and an lvm2_member. If I try: mount /dev/sdd2 I get "unknown filesystem linux_raid_member" I can bypass this error typing mount /dev/md5 But the error is now: "unknown filesystem lvm2_member" and I don't know how to bypass this error. Thank you for helping. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
make a bootable dvd
Bonjour, I downloaded the f40 iso for a worksation, but I did not see on the fedora website how to burn a bootable DVD with this iso file Maybe someone can tell me how to proceed. google indicates this for windows no windows at home. I prefer to use command line. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: issue with f40 installer [2]
Le 2024-07-06 23:20, Samuel Sieb a écrit : On 7/6/24 3:13 AM, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-06 09:43, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/6/24 00:37, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, On another post I complained that I couldn't install f40 due, I thought, to existing partitions on a disk... I tried to install on new disks without anything on them and used blivet-gui to define the partitions: I want RAID1 arrays, so I defined each of them asking for RAID1 on two disks and ext4 or luks file system. Here is the error message given when I press the Done button: https://www.bertuccio.homelinux.net/IMG_20240705_194641.jpg It is in French, I am sorry but I think that it understable The song is "device RAID cannot be of luks type, ext4 type... device RAID cannot be mounted on device /boot/efi,... partition EFI cannot be of type mdmember and so on... It is telling you that it wants a separate partition for /boot/efi and that separate partition cannot be part of a raid array. Thank you for answering. I changed my config and defined a separate partition boot-efi, and the message is still the same. Here what I have done: sda1 file system boot-efi mounted on /boot That is not correct. You need a FAT32 EFI partition mounted at /boot/efi. OK. I try again and define sda1 as a boot efi partition mounted on /boot/efi and *not* in a RAID1 array as specified. Other partitions are in RAID1 arrays ext4 as I wish. But The song is now (I translate from French): "The device of the boot loader stage2 f40-root (this my / partition) is on a multidisk matrix but not the one of stage1 sda1 (this is my /boot/efi partition)" I did not ask for the boot loader should be on the / partition but, as required on /boot/efi partition... This un-understable!! Who knows how to get out of this trap? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: issue with f40 installer [2]
Le 2024-07-06 23:20, Samuel Sieb a écrit : On 7/6/24 3:13 AM, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-06 09:43, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/6/24 00:37, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, On another post I complained that I couldn't install f40 due, I thought, to existing partitions on a disk... I tried to install on new disks without anything on them and used blivet-gui to define the partitions: I want RAID1 arrays, so I defined each of them asking for RAID1 on two disks and ext4 or luks file system. Here is the error message given when I press the Done button: https://www.bertuccio.homelinux.net/IMG_20240705_194641.jpg It is in French, I am sorry but I think that it understable The song is "device RAID cannot be of luks type, ext4 type... device RAID cannot be mounted on device /boot/efi,... partition EFI cannot be of type mdmember and so on... It is telling you that it wants a separate partition for /boot/efi and that separate partition cannot be part of a raid array. Thank you for answering. I changed my config and defined a separate partition boot-efi, and the message is still the same. Here what I have done: sda1 file system boot-efi mounted on /boot That is not correct. You need a FAT32 EFI partition mounted at /boot/efi. The installer offer boot efi as a partition and does not say anything about the file system nor it says what should be the mount point! I'll try /boot/efi next time. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: issue with f40 installer [2]
Le 2024-07-06 09:43, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/6/24 00:37, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, On another post I complained that I couldn't install f40 due, I thought, to existing partitions on a disk... I tried to install on new disks without anything on them and used blivet-gui to define the partitions: I want RAID1 arrays, so I defined each of them asking for RAID1 on two disks and ext4 or luks file system. Here is the error message given when I press the Done button: https://www.bertuccio.homelinux.net/IMG_20240705_194641.jpg It is in French, I am sorry but I think that it understable The song is "device RAID cannot be of luks type, ext4 type... device RAID cannot be mounted on device /boot/efi,... partition EFI cannot be of type mdmember and so on... It is telling you that it wants a separate partition for /boot/efi and that separate partition cannot be part of a raid array. Thank you for answering. I changed my config and defined a separate partition boot-efi, and the message is still the same. Here what I have done: sda1 file system boot-efi mounted on /boot sd[ab]2 RAID1 file system ext4 mounted on / sd[ab]3 RAID1 file system swap sd[ab]4 RAID1 file system ext4 mounted on /var sd[ab]5 RAID1 file system luks mounted on /crypt sd[ab]6 RAID1 file system ext4 mounted on /home Disks are 4Tib. I suppose that anaconda will define GPT partitions as I did not see any options allowing to choose this way. I did not see any option allowing to define primary or extended partitions I did not see any option allowing to combine RAID1 and lvm (which I would like to do!). Thank you for attention. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
issue with f40 installer [2]
Bonjour, On another post I complained that I couldn't install f40 due, I thought, to existing partitions on a disk... I tried to install on new disks without anything on them and used blivet-gui to define the partitions: I want RAID1 arrays, so I defined each of them asking for RAID1 on two disks and ext4 or luks file system. Here is the error message given when I press the Done button: https://www.bertuccio.homelinux.net/IMG_20240705_194641.jpg It is in French, I am sorry but I think that it understable The song is "device RAID cannot be of luks type, ext4 type... device RAID cannot be mounted on device /boot/efi,... partition EFI cannot be of type mdmember and so on... I don't understand: my f36 use RAID1 arrays with ext4 and luks file systems and lvm volumes. What did I do wrong? Than k you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: isues with f40 install
Le 2024-07-05 13:28, Jonathan Billings a écrit : On Jul 5, 2024, at 04:00, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-07-05 03:03, Tide Ka a écrit : Should I understand that if you have a windows installation on a disk with some (big) space left, you cannot install f40 as a dual boot system? (because anaconda is unable to ignore the windows partition) That (dual-boot) is based upon anaconda's behaviour. Basically it is about telling bootloader about other partitions to boot from by adding more entries. Anaconda being unable to ignore partition, in case of preparing a dual-boot, should not be the root cause. As you cannot add an entry for a partition if you simply ignore it. Just like others have mentioned, you may consider adding another entry to existing bootloader configuration instead of trying to make another ESP. How can I do that? I have a /boot partition (RAID1 array) containing kernel stuff for installed fedora 36 (config, initramfs, System.map, vmlinuz...) and some directories: efi/EFI/fedora/ (empty) grub2/ a lot of things for grub (config, etc...) loader/entries How can I use this partition to tell anaconda to add fedora 40 system boot? Thank you. Is it possible that your Fedora 36 install was installed as a BIOS boot install, but you’ve booted the Fedora 40 installer as an EFI boot? Yes! But how can I boot the installer as a BIOS boot? You can’t install a non-efi bootloader if you booted via EFI bootloader on installer. That would explain why there’s no EFI volume on your 36 install. -- Jonathan Billings -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: isues with f40 install
Le 2024-07-05 03:03, Tide Ka a écrit : Should I understand that if you have a windows installation on a disk with some (big) space left, you cannot install f40 as a dual boot system? (because anaconda is unable to ignore the windows partition) That (dual-boot) is based upon anaconda's behaviour. Basically it is about telling bootloader about other partitions to boot from by adding more entries. Anaconda being unable to ignore partition, in case of preparing a dual-boot, should not be the root cause. As you cannot add an entry for a partition if you simply ignore it. Just like others have mentioned, you may consider adding another entry to existing bootloader configuration instead of trying to make another ESP. How can I do that? I have a /boot partition (RAID1 array) containing kernel stuff for installed fedora 36 (config, initramfs, System.map, vmlinuz...) and some directories: efi/EFI/fedora/ (empty) grub2/ a lot of things for grub (config, etc...) loader/entries How can I use this partition to tell anaconda to add fedora 40 system boot? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: isues with f40 install
Le 2024-07-04 18:18, Mike Wright a écrit : On 7/4/24 09:09, François Patte wrote: Should I understand that if you have a windows installation on a disk with some (big) space left, you cannot install f40 as a dual boot system? (because anaconda is unable to ignore the windows partition) I *think* that there can be only one /boot/efi partition on a disk. So how can we proceed when you want a dual (fedora/fedora, fedora/debian, fedora.ubuntu) boot on the same disk? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: isues with f40 install
Le 2024-07-04 16:51, Tide Ka via users a écrit : Hello: 1-It seems (for me) that anaconda takes into accompt the sd[ab]1,2 partitions and does not accept the BIOS boot config and I can't say to anaconda to ignore these partitions: it rejects /boot (because not /boot/efi) and rejects / because lvm on RAID1 array. For this question I think that this might be unchangeable in anaconda, and it is currently not a question that can and should be solved by user's actions, as anaconda was developed to simplify installation procedures. Should I understand that if you have a windows installation on a disk with some (big) space left, you cannot install f40 as a dual boot system? (because anaconda is unable to ignore the windows partition) -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
isues with f40 install
Bonjour, I am stuck trying to installe f40 on my computer. I have 4 disks, 2 SSD and 2 HDD. On the SSDs run a fedora 36 install *which I want to keep untill the f40 will be installed and configured.* On the SSDs 2 partitions: 1) sda1 sdb1, 1Gb RAID1 array as /boot for the f36 install 2) sda2 sdb2, 60gb Raid1 array + lvm as / for the f36 install 60 gb are left on these disks. I want to install on the remaining space f40. So I created: 1) sda3 sdb3, 1 Gb for /boot RAID1 array ext4 file system 2) sda4 sdb4, 59gb for / RAID1 array Whatever I do for sda3 sdb3 (/boot or /boot/efi) anaconda does not want my attemps... My questions: 1-It seems (for me) that anaconda takes into accompt the sd[ab]1,2 partitions and does not accept the BIOS boot config and I can't say to anaconda to ignore these partitions: it rejects /boot (because not /boot/efi) and rejects / because lvm on RAID1 array. 2- How to create the new / partition (f40) as a RAID1 + lvm partition as I could buid the / partition for the f36 install? Thank you for attention. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~pa -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
install fedora 40 raid1+lvm
Bonjour, Where can I find some details on the installation of fedora 40, I would like to have raid1 arrays and lvm. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
remove a disk from raid1 array
Bonjour, I need to remove a disk from a raid1 array and restart the computer *without* that disk and without any other disk Up to now, if I stop the computer, unplug the disk and restart, the computer does not start complaining that it has not find all the disks. Do I have to remove the disk from the array (set it faulty and remove) with mdadm before stopping the computer? Or is there another way to proceed? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: shutdown as a simple user
Le 2024-04-01 10:40, Samuel Sieb a écrit : On 4/1/24 01:08, François Patte wrote: Up to yesterday, I was allowed to shutdown and hibernate my machine as a simple user. Using the gui or the command line? I use xfce and in the panel there is tab with the user name, using this you can shutdown, hibernate or lock the session. Now shutdown and hibernate are greyed and I can't use them. I have to become root in a terminal and use the command init 0. Yesterday a powercut while the machine was up suppressed this feature I don't understand why. How can recover this feature? How are you trying to do it and what happens? I have no idea about the way to recover... That's why I am asking this question. Thank you for helping. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
shutdown as a simple user
Bonjour, Up to yesterday, I was allowed to shutdown and hibernate my machine as a simple user. Yesterday a powercut while the machine was up suppressed this feature I don't understand why. How can recover this feature? Thank you -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: nextcloud with apache on fedora 38
Le 2023-08-26 06:27, Samuel Sieb a écrit : On 8/25/23 10:44, François Patte wrote: I would like to install a nextcloud server and I am seraching the detailed apache configuration related to this installation on fedora 38. I could find such a description for ubuntu but the apache configuration is different with this distrib. I have been running nextcloud on two different servers for a long time so I don't remember all the details required to set it up. It has been very stable since then. I think I'm mostly using the default apache config with adjustments to match my hostname. Also, an ssl config to have it work with letsencrypt, probably mostly the one provided by letsencrypt. I have a symlink: /var/www/nextcloud -> /var/lib/nextcloud and I expect that I had to add an selinux fcontext for that target directory. (I don't know off-hand why that symlink is necessary, but I tried removing it and changing the configs and apache rejected it.) I have nextcloud configured to use a particular data directory and I assume that has an fcontext as well. Thank you for this answer. I, at last, succeeded to install nextcloud (I could downgrade the php version, using remi repos) but I have some config problems and cannot find consistent help with fedora installation. For instance with selinux nextcloud help gives: semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t '/var/www/html/nextcloud/config(/.*)?' semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t '/var/www/html/nextcloud/apps(/.*)?' semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t '/var/www/html/nextcloud/data(/.*)?' semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t '/var/www/html/nextcloud/.user.ini' semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t '/var/www/html/nextcloud/3rdparty/aws/aws-sdk-php/src/data/logs(/.*)?' # restorecon -Rv '/var/www/html/nextcloud/' These files or directories do not exist, apps and data excepted which are located in /var/www/nextcloud. As it is now configured, nextcloud does not work with setenforce 1 I have this warning: PHP configuration option output_buffering must be disabled without any indication on the responsible php file: output_buffering if Off in /etc/php.ini I cannot configure the mail server... etc. I need some help! Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: nextcloud and php broken dependencies (f38)
Le 2023-08-26 13:04, José María Terry Jiménez via users a écrit : El 26/8/23 a las 11:13, François Patte escribió: Bonjour, I try to install a nextcloud server on f38. It seems that I need to use php but it is impossible: the nextcloud version and the php version given by the f38 repo are not compatible and I get this answer: This version of Nextcloud is not compatible with PHP>=8.2.You are currently running 8.2.9 I tried to upgrade nextcloud impossible I tried to downgrade php but the version given is 8.2.4, also not comptatible with nextcloud... I don't know what to do. Regards Hello Which Nextcloud version? nextcloud-25.0.3-1.fc38.noarch last version available on f38 -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
nextcloud and php broken dependencies (f38)
Bonjour, I try to install a nextcloud server on f38. It seems that I need to use php but it is impossible: the nextcloud version and the php version given by the f38 repo are not compatible and I get this answer: This version of Nextcloud is not compatible with PHP>=8.2.You are currently running 8.2.9 I tried to upgrade nextcloud impossible I tried to downgrade php but the version given is 8.2.4, also not comptatible with nextcloud... I don't know what to do. Regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
nextcloud with apache on fedora 38
Bonjour, I would like to install a nextcloud server and I am seraching the detailed apache configuration related to this installation on fedora 38. I could find such a description for ubuntu but the apache configuration is different with this distrib. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: f38 & snapd
Le 2023-08-23 14:25, Jonathan Billings a écrit : Le 2023-08-23 10:14, François Patte a écrit : I, at last, found a squashfs kernel module in another directory and installed it in /lib/modules/6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs/ but I can't load it: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'squashfs': Exec format error is the answer to modprobe squashfs, though it comes with the fedora package kernel-debug-modules-6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64 You found it in a kernel-debug-modules package, what kernel are you running? What is the output of `uname -r`? 6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64 -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: f38 & snapd
Le 2023-08-23 13:20, Ulf Volmer a écrit : Am Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 12:10:01PM +0200 schrieb François Patte: I, at last, found a squashfs kernel module in another directory and installed it in /lib/modules/6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs/ [ulf@yoga ~](28/0)$ modinfo squashfs|head -n 1 filename: /lib/modules/6.4.11-200.fc38.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs/squashfs.ko.xz [ulf@yoga ~](28/0)$ rpm -qf /lib/modules/6.4.11-200.fc38.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs/squashfs.ko.xz kernel-modules-6.4.11-200.fc38.x86_64 Do you mean that upgrading the kernel from 6.4.9 to 6.4.11 solves the problem? regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: f38 & snapd
Le 2023-08-23 10:14, François Patte a écrit : Le 2023-08-23 09:59, François Patte a écrit : Le 2023-08-21 22:51, Barry a écrit : On 15 Aug 2023, at 10:18, François Patte wrote: error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs image using A web search showed a possible answer install squashfuse? installed For another distrib it is suggested to load a kernel squash module using modprobe but there is no squash module on fedora! Sorry the exact name is squashfs and there is a squashfs directory in /lib/modules/6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64/kernel/fs/ (from package kernel-modules-core-6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64) but it is empty! I, at last, found a squashfs kernel module in another directory and installed it in /lib/modules/6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64/kernel/fs/squashfs/ but I can't load it: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'squashfs': Exec format error is the answer to modprobe squashfs, though it comes with the fedora package kernel-debug-modules-6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64 What can I do? Thank you. F.P. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: f38 & snapd
Le 2023-08-23 09:59, François Patte a écrit : Le 2023-08-21 22:51, Barry a écrit : On 15 Aug 2023, at 10:18, François Patte wrote: error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs image using A web search showed a possible answer install squashfuse? installed For another distrib it is suggested to load a kernel squash module using modprobe but there is no squash module on fedora! Sorry the exact name is squashfs and there is a squashfs directory in /lib/modules/6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64/kernel/fs/ (from package kernel-modules-core-6.4.9-200.fc38.x86_64) but it is empty! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: f38 & snapd
Le 2023-08-21 22:51, Barry a écrit : On 15 Aug 2023, at 10:18, François Patte wrote: error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs image using A web search showed a possible answer install squashfuse? installed For another distrib it is suggested to load a kernel squash module using modprobe but there is no squash module on fedora! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: f38 & snapd
Le 2023-08-21 17:03, stan via users a écrit : On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 11:30:55 +0200 François Patte wrote: No lights from anyone? I don't use snaps and know almost nothing about snaps, but maybe this link will help? https://computingforgeeks.com/install-snapd-and-snap-applications-on-fedora/ Thank you for this link but as far as can see the tuto's author forgot to try f38... -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: f38 & snapd
Le 2023-08-15 11:17, François Patte a écrit : Bonjour, on f38 it is possible to install snapd but it seems impossible to use it: while I wanted to install nextcloud via snap, I get this error message: error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs image using "squashfs": - mount: /tmp/syscheck-mountpoint-2175242409: type de système de fichiers « squashfs » inconnu. I installed squashfs-tools but no change... Thank you for lights. No lights from anyone? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
f38 & snapd
Bonjour, on f38 it is possible to install snapd but it seems impossible to use it: while I wanted to install nextcloud via snap, I get this error message: error: system does not fully support snapd: cannot mount squashfs image using "squashfs": - mount: /tmp/syscheck-mountpoint-2175242409: type de système de fichiers « squashfs » inconnu. I installed squashfs-tools but no change... Thank you for lights. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: recommended key pair encryption
Le 2023-08-14 21:16, Todd Zullinger a écrit : Mike Wright wrote: Hi all, I recall a discussion that may have said RSA was not being accepted in f38 and a different type was being preferred, possibly ecdsa? It's only old RSA1 keys which use SHA1 which are not accepted by default. RSA keys which use a SHA2 algorithm are perfectly acceptable. What could be helpfull would be to tell people how to create a SHA2 signature key I have a ssh connexion problem after upgrading a remote machine to f38 and it is hard to find out what to do to solve the problem. I succeeded (at last!): ssh-keygen -t rsa-sha2-256 -b 4096 -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: ssh connection and selinux
Le 2023-08-14 00:04, Cameron Simpson a écrit : On 13Aug2023 23:23, François Patte wrote: Since I upgraded to f38 it is impossible to connect to a machine using ssh rsa-key the file .ssh/authorized_keys has not change, but any remote connection to this machine asks for a password More likely you're not offering the RSA key any more or the remote isn't accepting it. Run "ssh -v" to see what's happening. Here's some example output from a run here: [...] debug1: Will attempt key: /home/cameron/.ssh/id_ecdsa ECDSA SHA256:* agent Here is the part I get with ssh -v: debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering public key: /home/patte/.ssh/id_rsa RSA SHA256: ** debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,gssapi-keyex,gssapi-with-mic,password debug1: Trying private key: /home/patte/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/patte/.ssh/id_ecdsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/patte/.ssh/id_ecdsa_sk debug1: Trying private key: /home/patte/.ssh/id_ed25519 debug1: Trying private key: /home/patte/.ssh/id_ed25519_sk debug1: Trying private key: /home/patte/.ssh/id_xmss I suspect some ssh configuration has changed with the upgrade, possibly in /etc/ssh/ssh_config. Certainly some key types (or smaller sizes) fall out of favour as they become inadequately secure. Where will it be mentionned? I have this in the /etc/ssh/ssh_config file: #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ed25519_key Thank you for helping. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
ssh connection and selinux
Bonjour, Since I upgraded to f38 it is impossible to connect to a machine using ssh rsa-key the file .ssh/authorized_keys has not change, but any remote connection to this machine asks for a password Is there something to change with selinux? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
nftables and selinux
Bonjour, I come accross a problem with nftables: it was impossible to start nftables, the error message is: internal:0:0-0: Error: Could not open file "/etc/sysconfig/nftables.conf": Permission denied This file /etc/sysconfig/nftables.conf has 755 permissions. I tried to get informatons from the internet but did not find a solution. I tested wether it was a selinux problem and I won... setenforce 0 solved the problem Now I went back to setenforce 1 but the problem is : if I reboot my machine, the problem will come back. How to make selinux accept nftables? fc36 nftables version 1.0.1 Thank you for helping. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: 1st problem when installing f38
Le 2023-06-09 14:01, Peter Boy a écrit : Am 09.06.2023 um 09:48 schrieb François Patte : ... Is it possible to unplug one of the disks (say sdf) and make an install with a raid1 in degraded mode (+lvm) then, when the install is finished, to plug again the disk sdf and synchronise the partitions with mdadm? Moreover, I don't understand why the problem occurs only with sde1 and sdf1 and not with the other disks (sde2, sdf2 as already pointed) : I have 6 disks, and more partitions, paired in pairs as raid members. Thank you for lights. No answer... Is this problem so uncommon? Or so obvious? I suppose, the issue is a bit complex and a bit confusing. The first question is which Fedora edition you want to install. The installation routines differ a lot and so do the possible solutions. I tried f38 netinstall. Additionally, in the previous thread, I recall that the affected disks are to be reinstalled any way and can be reformatted beforehand. Is that not a solution? Reformat the disks where the system is installed (2 on 6) OK, but why should I reformat the other disks? And I don't understand why there are duplicates UUID and why the f38 installer complains about these duplicates UUID on disk /dev/ssde1 and /dev/sdf1 and not for the duplicates UUID on /dev/sde2 and /dev/sdf2? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: 1st problem when installing f38
Le 2023-06-06 10:28, François Patte a écrit : Bonjour, I am following advices given in answering my previous post "issue" and I get f38 installer. The installer complains that there is a duplicate UUID on some disks : parts sde1 and sdf1 That's true! Running blkid gives: /dev/sde1: UUID="4a28174a-f38b-4938-233f-85f76ce585a8" UUID_SUB="88a5f939-72d4-b330-95e6-52fa0b826203" LABEL="dipankar:4" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-01" ^^^ /dev/sdf1: UUID="4a28174a-f38b-4938-233f-85f76ce585a8" UUID_SUB="99b46805-aa31-1711-21dc-89cb7177d025" LABEL="dipankar:4" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-01" But it is not the only case and it does not complain for the other one: /dev/sde2: UUID="5240f249-7feb-6832-6682-805f97c4abea" UUID_SUB="0e21ab45-27a2-f588-48a9-cd46d0dc6237" LABEL="dipankar:5" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-02" ^^^ /dev/sdf2: UUID="5240f249-7feb-6832-6682-805f97c4abea" UUID_SUB="5838df23-817e-f3cb-19f3-31da8d3e99d0" LABEL="dipankar:5" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-02" What does this mean? And what shall I do? The installer suggests to unplug these disks (or at list one of these disks) but, as you can see these disks are members of a raid array with the swap, /var and a crypted partition (sde1 and sdf1) and /home (sde2 and sdf2) Is it possible to unplug one of the disks (say sdf) and make an install with a raid1 in degraded mode (+lvm) then, when the install is finished, to plug again the disk sdf and synchronise the partitions with mdadm? Moreover, I don't understand why the problem occurs only with sde1 and sdf1 and not with the other disks (sde2, sdf2 as already pointed) : I have 6 disks, and more partitions, paired in pairs as raid members. Thank you for lights. No answer... Is this problem so uncommon? Or so obvious? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
1st problem when installing f38
Bonjour, I am following advices given in answering my previous post "issue" and I get f38 installer. The installer complains that there is a duplicate UUID on some disks : parts sde1 and sdf1 That's true! Running blkid gives: /dev/sde1: UUID="4a28174a-f38b-4938-233f-85f76ce585a8" UUID_SUB="88a5f939-72d4-b330-95e6-52fa0b826203" LABEL="dipankar:4" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-01" ^^^ /dev/sdf1: UUID="4a28174a-f38b-4938-233f-85f76ce585a8" UUID_SUB="99b46805-aa31-1711-21dc-89cb7177d025" LABEL="dipankar:4" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-01" But it is not the only case and it does not complain for the other one: /dev/sde2: UUID="5240f249-7feb-6832-6682-805f97c4abea" UUID_SUB="0e21ab45-27a2-f588-48a9-cd46d0dc6237" LABEL="dipankar:5" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-02" ^^^ /dev/sdf2: UUID="5240f249-7feb-6832-6682-805f97c4abea" UUID_SUB="5838df23-817e-f3cb-19f3-31da8d3e99d0" LABEL="dipankar:5" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-02" What does this mean? And what shall I do? The installer suggests to unplug these disks (or at list one of these disks) but, as you can see these disks are members of a raid array with the swap, /var and a crypted partition (sde1 and sdf1) and /home (sde2 and sdf2) Is it possible to unplug one of the disks (say sdf) and make an install with a raid1 in degraded mode (+lvm) then, when the install is finished, to plug again the disk sdf and synchronise the partitions with mdadm? Moreover, I don't understand why the problem occurs only with sde1 and sdf1 and not with the other disks (sde2, sdf2 as already pointed) : I have 6 disks, and more partitions, paired in pairs as raid members. Thank you for lights. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: issue with dnf system upgrade
Le 2023-06-05 18:20, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : On Mon, 2023-06-05 at 12:41 -0300, George N. White III wrote: On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:15 AM François Patte < francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > Bonjour, > > Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. > > Downloading the package was okay. What package? Sorry, I forgot an "s": the f36 packages... -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: issue with dnf system upgrade
Le 2023-06-05 20:19, Samuel Sieb a écrit : On 6/5/23 06:14, François Patte wrote: Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. Downloading the package was okay. Problems occur when I agreed to system-upgrade-reboot: What exact commands did you run? When downloading f36 packages ends, the message is ... do system-upgrade-reboot ... so I ran: system-upgrade-reboot > 1- No display... I could only dee the led showing HDD accesses Did it reboot to the grub menu. No -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
issue with dnf system upgrade
Bonjour, Today I tried to upgrade from fc34 to fc36. Downloading the package was okay. Problems occur when I agreed to system-upgrade-reboot: 1- No display... I could only dee the led showing HDD accesses 2- After sometimes (when no more accesses were showed, I press enter key on the keyboard and the system rebooted on fc34 kernel and still no display... 3- I pressed the "y" key on the the keyboard (in case the system upgrade was asking some question...) and the display came (hurray!) : I could see the login screen of the fc36 version. I could login but all my previous display settings were gone 4- I checked the kernel with command uname -r and it is stille the fc34 kernel which running... No f36 packages have been installed in /boot 5- many packages from fc34 remain installed and only some fc36 packages have been installed. What can I do to have a coherent fc36 install now? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
semanage in f36
Bonjour, Wanting to change the ssh default port, I read in /etc/ssh/sshd_config : "If you want to change the port on a SELinux system, you have to tell SELinux about this change. semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp #PORTNUMBER" So, I tried this command, but: semanage: command not found What can I do? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: strange ip address reported by nftables
Le 2022-08-20 12:03, Tim via users a écrit : On Sat, 2022-08-20 at 09:58 +0200, François Patte wrote: The problem is: how an IP from a private network (10) could reach my machine through the internet? WiFi? I don't understand your question. The machine is connected to the box with anethernet cable? Smart devices within your home? What do you call "smart devices"? Something like Amazon Alexa? No, I haven't. Does your ISP have real public IPs, or are they NATing you? How can I know this? ifconfig reports 3 IP addresses: - 192.168.1.16 which is my private network and 2 IP V6 : - fe80: my private network - 2a01:cb14: routable IP from my ISP (Orange) -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: strange ip address reported by nftables
Le 2022-08-20 12:35, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : On Sat, 2022-08-20 at 09:58 +0200, François Patte wrote: Le 2022-08-20 08:56, Barry a écrit : > > On 19 Aug 2022, at 21:33, François Patte > > wrote: > > > > Bonjour, > > > > This morning, logwatch reported this in the iptables section: > > > > Logged 99 packets on interface enp3s0 > > . > > From 10.91.96.218 - 6 packets to udp(54366) > > > > How, this IP address could be logged on my private network (which > > is > > 192.168.1.0)? > > That is where it is FROM where is it TO? Was it to a broadcast > address > for example? TO port 54366 Nothing behind this port... The problem is: how an IP from a private network (10) could reach my machine through the internet? Are you sure it came via the Internet? Seems unlikely. Are you running any virtual machines? No virtual machine on board. What happens if you ping that address? Nothing 100% packets lost -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: strange ip address reported by nftables
Le 2022-08-20 08:56, Barry a écrit : On 19 Aug 2022, at 21:33, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, This morning, logwatch reported this in the iptables section: Logged 99 packets on interface enp3s0 . From 10.91.96.218 - 6 packets to udp(54366) How, this IP address could be logged on my private network (which is 192.168.1.0)? That is where it is FROM where is it TO? Was it to a broadcast address for example? TO port 54366 Nothing behind this port... The problem is: how an IP from a private network (10) could reach my machine through the internet? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
strange ip address reported by nftables
Bonjour, This morning, logwatch reported this in the iptables section: Logged 99 packets on interface enp3s0 . From 10.91.96.218 - 6 packets to udp(54366) How, this IP address could be logged on my private network (which is 192.168.1.0)? I miss something Thank you for clarification. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
test
test -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
subtitles conversion question
Bonjour, I have some films in mkv format with many subtitles tracks : hdmv_pgs_subtitles I can extract these tracks and I want to convert them in srt text format. I use a java script (found on the web) BDSup2Sub512.jar which can convert the hdmv_pgs files in two files: one has extension .idx the other one the .sub extension. I found this web site: https://subconverter.com/convert-sub-idx-to-srt-online Which I can use to convert these two files in a .srt file. So far, so good! Is there a tool on linux which could do the same job? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
rkhunter warning
Bonjour, rkhunter warns me about "suspicious files": Warning: Hidden file found: /dev/shm/.org.chromium.Chromium.pZwgHO: data What are these files? Created when I used google-chrome? And what to do with this warning? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
wifi connection problem.
Bonjour, Every day, after sometimes, my wifi connection is lost with this message in the logs: wpa_supplicant[3076]: wlp6s0: CTRL-EVENT-BEACON-LOSS I don't know what causes this. It happens since the last upgrade I performed on my machine. To reconnect my wifi, I have to restart the NetworkManager service. Is it a known bug and what causes this dysfonction? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
iptables-restore-translate
Bonjour, I would like to move from iptables to nftables which seeems to be the nowadays firewall and there were an app to translate iptables rules into nftables rules, but some (clever) packager seems to have withdraw this command from the iptables-compat package which installed on my f34 install. I tried to uninstall this iptables-compat (succeeded) and to install the iptables-1.8.7-3.fc34.x86_64 package but failed for some obscure reasons... Is there a way to have this translator available somewhere? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Logwatch Kernel Errors Present
Bonjour, I have these lines in my dayly logwatch, what do they mean? WARNING: Kernel Errors Present ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not ...: 12 Time(s) ACPI Error: Aborting method ...: 12 Time(s) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7276 at /tmp/akmodsbuild.CM ...: 1 Time(s) WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 6287 at /tmp/akmodsbuild.CM ...: 1 Time(s) \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT2._GTF due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) ( ...: 1 Time(s) Thank you for your lights. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
google-chrome and sound
Bonjour, Since an update (I can't remember when...) google-chrome changes my sound status at strartup: whatever the settings of loud-speakers and mic are, it opens them and sets them at 50% each. How to forbid chrome to do that? Thank you. google chrome v 94.0.4606.81 -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: capabilities of softwares on fedora vs on developper's platform
Le 2021-10-20 11:37, Patrick O'Callaghan a écrit : On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 10:26 +0200, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, I am wondering why fedora packagers limit the capabilities of softwares: I installed blender from fedora repo (f34) version 2.93.5. It is impossible to enable the graphical acceleration of my graphic card (nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). I went to blender official site and got the same version of blender and graphical acceleration is set without any problem. Why this difference? Which Nvidia driver are you using? The Nouveau driver almost certainly doesn't support this feature. The non-free binary Nvidia one might do so (I haven't checked) but that's not an official Fedora package. You need to get it from RPMfusion. I use nvidia driver from rpmfusion and this feature is enabled when I use blender from blender site but not from /pub/linux/fedora/linux/updates/34/Everything/x86_64/Packages/ on fedora mirrors. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Problem Fedora 33 installing fonts
Le 2021-10-19 21:51, Michael Eager a écrit : I'm trying to install the liberation fonts in F33. I've run fc-cache after install, but xfontsel does not see the new font. fc-list | grep -i liberation I am wondering why you have to install the liberation fonts, for me these fonts are installed by default... Moreover when you install fonts in ~/.fonts you have nothing else to do! fc-list will show you the newly installed fonts. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
capabilities of softwares on fedora vs on developper's platform
Bonjour, I am wondering why fedora packagers limit the capabilities of softwares: I installed blender from fedora repo (f34) version 2.93.5. It is impossible to enable the graphical acceleration of my graphic card (nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). I went to blender official site and got the same version of blender and graphical acceleration is set without any problem. Why this difference? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
cups is the worst software....
Bonjour, I have several computers at home and one with an usr-printer attached. I struggled sometimes to configure cups on other computers to use this printer. Now I upgraded to f34, and the configuration no longer works: "printer is misconfigured or no longer exists" is the answer if I send a test page After deleting the printer, I try to use the discovery tool in the administration page of cups (localhost:631) and it find the printer attached to my main computer but at the end of the configuration, when I try to print a test page, the answer is the same: "printer is misconfigured or no longer exists" This tool also finds old printers I configured many years ago and which (really) non longer exist... What to do? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: rkhunter warning
Le 2021-08-12 12:50, Sam Varshavchik a écrit : François Patte writes: Bonjour, Since I upgraded to f34, rkhunter is warning me with this file: Warning: Hidden file found: /usr/share/man/fr/man1/..1.gz: symbolic link to builtins.1.gz Asking rpm -qf /usr/share/man/fr/man1/..1.gz, it returns that this file belongs to the man-pages-fr package. rkhunter --propupd does not change anything, every day rkhunter sends me a warning mail... Which of these two must be believed: rkhunter or rpm -qf? rpm is correct, this file is installed by the man-pages-fr package. But this does look like a packaging bug. You should create a bug in Bugzilla, to get rid of this weird symlink. Where do I go to file a bug: on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/saml2_metadata.cgi, they want to use my Fedora Account but if I try to log in via this fedora account, it is unauthorized I do have a fedora account where I can log in without any difficulties... -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: umask for root
Le 2021-08-24 19:03, Samuel Sieb a écrit : On 2021-08-24 9:50 a.m., François Patte wrote: Thank you for your explanations. I made some progress in my investigations: the problem seems to be a change in the "su" command from f32 to f34: my personnal umask is 0077 and I use to log as root using the command "su -". Until f32 this way of doing gave a root login with all environment variables of the root account (including the UMASK). As far as I can see this is no more the case in f34 Where is the config for the "su" command? And is it possible to change this behavior? umask isn't an environment variable. It's a kernel setting for the process. Why are you using "su" anyway instead of "sudo"? (I don't know if that will change anything regarding the umask, but it's better to not have a root password.) I am using su instead of sudo because: 1- I am a dinosaur from the Unix times... 2- the times are not so ancient when you performed a fedora install you where asked to set a root password... 3- since these times, appeared the "dnf system upgrade" where the previous config is continued and my systems are still using a root password and have no sudoers config... (for how long will it last and will the packagers inform us of a major change for this?) 4- I found strange the sudo system for it allows to give permissions on the machine to people who may have a (very) weak password... 5- At the university they have installed users'machine with ubuntu and sudo system, they gave me all permissions on my machine and I have to do a "sudo bash" if I want to make changes on it I have to change the umask if I don't want to limit changes to root only..., moreover the bash history becomes a mix of my commands as a simple user and the commands I run as root... it is a hotchpotch of commands which becomes quickly unusable... 6- there are, maybe, some other inconveniences... Maybe this will help: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/328104/setting-umask-for-su-user-command I'ill study this... But, I think I'll add to the /root/bashrc "umask=0022" hoping that it will solve my problem. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: umask for root
Le 2021-08-24 15:17, Jonathan Billings a écrit : On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:28:17AM +0200, François Patte wrote: The only file talking of umask is /etc/bashrc: if [ $UID -gt 199 ] && [ "`id -gn`" = "`id -un`" ]; then umask 002 else umask 022 fi I don't understand the meaning It means: If your UID is greater than 199 *AND* your username and group name are the same, set the umask to 002, otherwise, set the umask to 022. This makes sense. System accounts are usually below UID 200, so you want a more restrictive umask on them. As for the logic about user == group, if your group isn't the same as your username, then you are likely to be in a UNIX group that has multiple members, so it is a good idea to set your umask to 022 so files you create aren't writable by others in your group by default. But if your group is the same as your username, most likely there won't be other users with the same group ID, so there is little risk to having group-writable files created by default. As for why your system has a umask of 077, that sounds like you've made some change to your configuration someplace. If you don't see it in one of your dot files, /etc/bashrc or /etc/profile.d, the pam_umask.so in /etc/pam.d/postlogin looks for umask from the following locations: * umask= entry in the user's GECOS field * umask= argument * UMASK entry from /etc/login.defs * UMASK= entry from /etc/default/login (Apparently the GECOS field in the pwent can be split on a comma and have metadata like umask= in it. Check 'man pam_umask' for more details) I suggest checking those places too. Thank you for your explanations. I made some progress in my investigations: the problem seems to be a change in the "su" command from f32 to f34: my personnal umask is 0077 and I use to log as root using the command "su -". Until f32 this way of doing gave a root login with all environment variables of the root account (including the UMASK). As far as I can see this is no more the case in f34 Where is the config for the "su" command? And is it possible to change this behavior? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: umask for root
Le 2021-08-24 11:29, Tim via users a écrit : François Patte: I have another computer with fedora 32 and the default umask for root is 0022. Has config been changed from f32 to f34? Samuel Sieb: All my F34 systems have a umask of 0022 for root, so it must be something specific to yours. The first thing that springs to mind when people have different defaults, is: Are one of you doing fresh installs, and the other updates over the top of prior releases? I have just upgraded another machine from f32 to f34 and before upgrade root umask was 0022, now it is 0077 What is this mystery? The other thought is dual-booting, and sharing of user directories. I don't have a dual boot. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: umask for root
Le 2021-08-24 10:34, Samuel Sieb a écrit : On 8/24/21 1:28 AM, François Patte wrote: Le 2021-08-23 23:34, Joe Wulf via users a écrit : Check: /etc/bashrc, /etc/profile, /root/.bash_profile and /root/.bashrc, in that order The only file talking of umask is /etc/bashrc: if [ $UID -gt 199 ] && [ "`id -gn`" = "`id -un`" ]; then umask 002 else umask 022 fi I don't understand the meaning I have another computer with fedora 32 and the default umask for root is 0022. Has config been changed from f32 to f34? All my F34 systems have a umask of 0022 for root, so it must be something specific to yours. Maybe, but where is defined the umask for root? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: umask for root
Le 2021-08-23 23:34, Joe Wulf via users a écrit : Check: /etc/bashrc, /etc/profile, /root/.bash_profile and /root/.bashrc, in that order The only file talking of umask is /etc/bashrc: if [ $UID -gt 199 ] && [ "`id -gn`" = "`id -un`" ]; then umask 002 else umask 022 fi I don't understand the meaning I have another computer with fedora 32 and the default umask for root is 0022. Has config been changed from f32 to f34? Thank you. On Monday, August 23, 2021, 04:46:48 PM EDT, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, What is the default umask for root? Until now I thought it was 0022, but, today I can see it is 0077 Has something been changed somewhere in my install? Where? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
umask for root
Bonjour, What is the default umask for root? Until now I thought it was 0022, but, today I can see it is 0077 Has something been changed somewhere in my install? Where? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New selinux problem [weird!]
Le 2021-08-17 01:25, Thomas Cameron a écrit : Thank you for answering. This video is going a little bit to fast for me: if I can read and speak English, it is easier for me if people speak a bit slower... Anyway, as far as I understand, if I want to re-enable selinux I have to: 1- change the config file to enforcing 2- touch /.autorelabel 3- reboot Did I miss something? Yes, that will work. It seems that the sequence should be: 1- touch /.autorelabel 2- reboot 3- change the config file to enforcing 4- reboot -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: New selinux problem [weird!]
Le 2021-08-16 17:35, Thomas Cameron a écrit : This may be helpful: Security-Enhanced Linux for mere mortals https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WOKRaM-HI4 I gave this presentation at Red Hat Summit a couple of years ago, it's still relevant. I talk about how to enable SELinux on a system where it's been disabled. Hope this helps! Thank you for answering. This video is going a little bit to fast for me: if I can read and speak English, it is easier for me if people speak a bit slower... Anyway, as far as I understand, if I want to re-enable selinux I have to: 1- change the config file to enforcing 2- touch /.autorelabel 3- reboot Did I miss something? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
New selinux problem [weird!]
Bonjour, For some reason (I explain later) I disabled selinux in /etc/selinux/config file. When I re-enabled selinux (SELINUX=enforcing in the config file) I could not restart my system: no service could start and I got a kernel panic. I had to rescue my system (see my other post) and disabled selinux. Why??? I remember that long ago, when you enabled selinux boot could last a long time waiting for the indexation of files, but I have never seen a kernel panic. So, how do I proceed to re-enable selinux on my system? Thank you. PS. I disabled selinux because it prevented to start a service (dictd, see my post) but it was a wrong message of selinux alert: the problem was not selinux but the upgrade from f32 to f34 which had changed the owner of the dictd.log file (dictd changed to root). This is a second wrong message with the one of the rescue tool (see my post on rescue) -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: struggling with rescue system [SOLVED]
Le 2021-08-16 12:44, François Patte a écrit : Bonjour, For an unknown reason my system won't boot (kernel panic) and I try to rescue it. I made an usb netinstall of fedora34 and booted on it but the rescue system tool pretends that I have no linux partition Running fdisk -l from the recue shell I can see all my partitions which are all raid linux autodetected... Is there a special way to mount these kind of partition with the rescue tool? mount /dev/mdX Then it does not know how to deal with lvm, so: mount /dev/mapper/folder-lvm Why the rescue tool gives a wrong message (it could provoke a heart attack on people trying to rescue a system brutally informed that he has lost all his data...) -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
struggling with rescue system
Bonjour, For an unknown reason my system won't boot (kernel panic) and I try to rescue it. I made an usb netinstall of fedora34 and booted on it but the rescue system tool pretends that I have no linux partition Running fdisk -l from the recue shell I can see all my partitions which are all raid linux autodetected... Is there a special way to mount these kind of partition with the rescue tool? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire MAP5 --- UMR CNRS 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
struggling with rescue system
Bonjour, For an unknown reason my system won't boot (kernel panic) and I try to rescue it. I made an usb netinstall of fedora34 and booted on it but the rescue system tool pretends that I have no linux partition Running fdisk -l from the recue shell I can see all my partitions which are all raid linux autodetected... Is there a special way to mount these kind of partition with the rescue tool? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire MAP5 --- UMR CNRS 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
selinux problem
Bonjour, Sometimes selinux blocks access to a file without any clear reasons: yesterday it was ok, today it is blocked... Why? I don't know, I changed nothing, did not make any upgrade... Today dictd cannot start: SELinux forbids dictd an open access to /var/log/dictd.log. Suggestion: # ausearch -c "dictd" --raw | audit2allow -M my-dictd # semodule -X 300 -i my-dictd.pp And no changes dictd does not start and new alerts are sent with the same message... What shall I do? setenforce=0, disable selinux Another alert concerns rpcbind: selinux blocks access to port 63184 and the suggestion: semanage port -a -t PORT_TYPE -p udp 63184 où PORT_TYPE est l'une des valeurs suivantes : agentx_port_t, apertus_ldp_port_t, comsat_port_t, dhcpc_port_t, dhcpd_port_t, dns_port_t, efs_port_t, flash_port_t, ftp_port_t, gdomap_port_t, hi_reserved_port_t, inetd_child_port_t, ipmi_port_t, ipp_port_t, kerberos_admin_port_t, kerberos_port_t, kprop_port_t, ktalkd_port_t, ldap_port_t, pki_ca_port_t, pop_port_t, portmap_port_t, printer_port_t, rlogin_port_t, rlogind_port_t, rndc_port_t, router_port_t, rsh_port_t, rsync_port_t, rtsp_port_t, rwho_port_t, smtp_port_t, spamd_port_t, swat_port_t, syslogd_port_t, uucpd_port_t. Oh! That's totally clear I'ill try all these ports untill I find the good one? Thank you for helping. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: how to replace a disk in a raid-1 array by a larger one?
Le 2021-08-05 12:50, José María Terry Jiménez a écrit : El 5/8/21 a las 12:35, François Patte escribió: Bonjour, I have a raid-1 array of 2 disks (1 Tb) and I want to replace these disks by 2 2Tb disks. Here is the result of lsblk for these disks: sde 8:64 0 931,5G 0 disk ├─sde1 8:65 040G 0 part │ └─md4 9:4040G 0 raid1 │ ├─systeme-swap253:10 4G 0 lvm [SWAP] │ ├─systeme-var 253:2015G 0 lvm /var │ └─systeme-chiffre 253:3015G 0 lvm └─sde2 8:66 0 891,5G 0 part └─md5 9:50 891,4G 0 raid1 └─data-home 253:50 891G 0 lvm /home sdf 8:80 0 931,5G 0 disk ├─sdf1 8:81 040G 0 part │ └─md4 9:4040G 0 raid1 │ ├─systeme-swap253:10 4G 0 lvm [SWAP] │ ├─systeme-var 253:2015G 0 lvm /var │ └─systeme-chiffre 253:3015G 0 lvm └─sdf2 8:82 0 891,5G 0 part └─md5 9:50 891,4G 0 raid1 └─data-home 253:50 891G 0 lvm /home My idea is to stop the array, remove one disk and have this array in degraded mode with the other disk. Then plug a new disk (2Tb) on which I build a new array in degraded mode with all partitions and lvm needed. Then I transfer all the data from the remaining 1Tb disk to the new array, replace the 1Tb disk by a new 2Tb disk and then synchronize the new array. Is it the good way to proceed? Or is there another better way? Thank you for all advices. Search for mdadm --grow See for example: https://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/865/replace-drive-with-bigger-one-grow-expand-software-mdadm-raid or https://www.tjansson.dk/2015/12/growing-a-mdadm-raid-by-replacing-disks/ Thank you for these addresses, I found this one too: https://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/865/replace-drive-with-bigger-one-grow-expand-software-mdadm-raid -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
rkhunter warning
Bonjour, Since I upgraded to f34, rkhunter is warning me with this file: Warning: Hidden file found: /usr/share/man/fr/man1/..1.gz: symbolic link to builtins.1.gz Asking rpm -qf /usr/share/man/fr/man1/..1.gz, it returns that this file belongs to the man-pages-fr package. rkhunter --propupd does not change anything, every day rkhunter sends me a warning mail... Which of these two must be believed: rkhunter or rpm -qf? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
complaints after upgrade
Bonjour, I have just upgrade from f32 to f34 and encounter some issues: 1- firefox 90 has (once more) change its configuration I can only see one tab: the one which is displayed; if I want to see another open tab, I have to close the one I am reading... Very easy! Moreover, the tab bar has moved from top to bottom and it seems to be impossible to change this. 2- So, I tried to downgrade firefox using dnf downgrade but: can't create transaction lock on /var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock After some researches, I found that I have to do: /sbin/restorecon -v /var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock and then: rpmdb --rebuilddb But this failed for the same reason : "can't create etc" I had to do: ausearch -c "rpmdb" --raw | audit2allow -M my-rpmdb semodule -X 300 -i my-rpmdb.pp At last I could downgrade firefox... And I added excludepkgs=firefox in dnf.conf file. 3- There is a service: rpmdb-rebuild.service but it is impossible to start this service for the same reason "can't create transaction lock on /var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock" "rpmdb-rebuild.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=255/EXCEPTION" how to solve this problem? 4- nmb service does not start: août 08 16:47:26 dipankar nmbd[3672]: [2021/08/08 16:47:26.806260, 0] ../../lib/util/debug.c:1104(reopen_one_log) août 08 16:47:26 dipankar nmbd[3672]: reopen_one_log: Unable to open new log file '/var/log/samba/': est un dossier août 08 16:47:26 dipankar nmbd[3672]: [2021/08/08 16:47:26.836907, 0] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:147(daemon_status) août 08 16:47:26 dipankar nmbd[3672]: daemon_status: daemon 'nmbd' : No local IPv4 non-loopback interfaces available, waiting for interface ... août 08 16:47:26 dipankar nmbd[3672]: [2021/08/08 16:47:26.843297, 0] ../../source3/nmbd/nmbd_subnetdb.c:253(create_subnets) août 08 16:47:26 dipankar nmbd[3672]: NOTE: NetBIOS name resolution is not supported for Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6). août 08 16:48:56 dipankar systemd[1]: nmb.service: start operation timed out. Terminating. août 08 16:48:56 dipankar systemd[1]: nmb.service: Failed with result 'timeout'. août 08 16:48:56 dipankar systemd[1]: Failed to start Samba NMB Daemon. What can I do? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
how to replace a disk in a raid-1 array by a larger one?
Bonjour, I have a raid-1 array of 2 disks (1 Tb) and I want to replace these disks by 2 2Tb disks. Here is the result of lsblk for these disks: sde 8:64 0 931,5G 0 disk ├─sde1 8:65 040G 0 part │ └─md4 9:4040G 0 raid1 │ ├─systeme-swap253:10 4G 0 lvm [SWAP] │ ├─systeme-var 253:2015G 0 lvm /var │ └─systeme-chiffre 253:3015G 0 lvm └─sde2 8:66 0 891,5G 0 part └─md5 9:50 891,4G 0 raid1 └─data-home 253:50 891G 0 lvm /home sdf 8:80 0 931,5G 0 disk ├─sdf1 8:81 040G 0 part │ └─md4 9:4040G 0 raid1 │ ├─systeme-swap253:10 4G 0 lvm [SWAP] │ ├─systeme-var 253:2015G 0 lvm /var │ └─systeme-chiffre 253:3015G 0 lvm └─sdf2 8:82 0 891,5G 0 part └─md5 9:50 891,4G 0 raid1 └─data-home 253:50 891G 0 lvm /home My idea is to stop the array, remove one disk and have this array in degraded mode with the other disk. Then plug a new disk (2Tb) on which I build a new array in degraded mode with all partitions and lvm needed. Then I transfer all the data from the remaining 1Tb disk to the new array, replace the 1Tb disk by a new 2Tb disk and then synchronize the new array. Is it the good way to proceed? Or is there another better way? Thank you for all advices. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire MAP5 --- UMR CNRS 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
how to configure smartd to send a mail with ssmtp?
Bonjour, I dessperatly try to have smartd sending me an email with ssmtp but it seems to be impossible! There are a lot of environment variables (SMARTD_MAILER, SMARTD_ADDRESS...) but nowhere I found where they could be defined! I tried in file smartd.conf, in smartd_warning.sh, in /usr/libexec/smartmontools/smartdnotify... But it does not work. Does somebody know how to proceed? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire MAP5 --- UMR CNRS 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
thunderbird 78
Bonjour, I bupdate my fedora 32 yesterday and thunderbird 78 has been installed... So I can't get my mail!!! What is the magic to get mails with thunderbird 78? Thank you. PS. I downgraded thunderbird and the downgraded version is 68: french langpack, enigmail do not work with TB 68 -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
aegisub no more working after update...
Bonjour, I just update my system (fc-32) and aegisub is no more working: I can open subtitlefiles but not the corresponding video... Here the message: (aegisub:347417): Gdk-ERROR **: 12:08:25.195: The program 'aegisub' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation)'. (Details: serial 37349 error_code 2 request_code 150 (GLX) minor_code 24) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the GDK_SYNCHRONIZE environment variable to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) I don't understand what it means and don't know what to do Thank you for any help. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
rkhunter warnings
Bonjour, Since the last update of f32, rkhunter send a lot of warning (in spite of the --propupd I run after each update...): Warning: Checking for possible rootkit files and directories [ Warning ] Found file '/lib/libkeyutils.so.1.9'. Possible rootkit: Sniffer component Found file '/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9'. Possible rootkit: Sniffer component Found file '/usr/lib/libkeyutils.so.1.9'. Possible rootkit: Sniffer component Found file '/usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9'. Possible rootkit: Sniffer component Warning: The following processes are using suspicious files: Command: abrt-applet UID: 2995PID: 2663 Pathname: 24376 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: abrtd UID: 0PID: 1580 Pathname: /usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: abrt-dbus UID: 0PID: 3087 Pathname: /usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: abrt-dump-journ UID: 0PID: 1629 Pathname: /usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: auditd UID: 0PID: 1386 Pathname: /usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: chrome<-this one repeated several times-> UID: 11750PID: 11749 Pathname: 24376 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: cleanupd UID: 0PID: 2062 Pathname: /usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: cupsd UID: 0PID: 1525 Pathname: /usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: dnfdragora-upda UID: 3025PID: 2621 Pathname: /usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: evolution-addre UID: 3025PID: 3168 Pathname: /usr/lib64/libkeyutils.so.1.9 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component Command: evolution-alarm UID: 3007PID: 2571 Pathname: 24376 Possible Rootkit: Spam tool component etc. etc. chkrootkit does not teturn any problem... What is the problem? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
surprise while upgrading
Bonjour, I wanted to upgrade a machine today and run dnf upgrade... Amongst the packages, I could see a full install of texlive which is not installed So, I asked: rpm -q --whatrequires texlive answer: aucun paquet ne requiert texlive (no package requires texlive) I thought that, maybe, it was not a full install of texlive and asked, randomly choosing a package that this upgrade wanted to install: rpm -q --whatrequires texlive-polyglossia answer: aucun paquet ne requiert texlive (no package requires texlive) What's wrong? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
audacity
Bonjour, Since the last upgrade to f33 I can't record anything using audacity: whatever the recording device I choose, the message is the same: error opening recording device error code: -9997 invalid sample rate Once upon a time it used to work without any problem. Explanations on the audacity site are not clear at all for somebody like me... Does anybody know how to configure audacity for recording? Thank you for helping. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
systemd automount
Bonjour, I configured an automount of directories located on a server on my local network: in the fstab of a computer on the network I put the line: 192.168.1.16:/data /home/patte/data nfs noauto,rw,user,nofail,x-systemd.automount,x-systemd.mount-timeout=30 0 0 It works. If the server is down, no problem, the boot of the computer is OK. But if the server gets down while the computer is working, this turns in an awful way: everything on the computer becomes very slow, opening a file manager takes ages, the ls command does no work and it is impossible to unmount the directory on which the server is mounted. Did I forgot an option in the fstab? Is there a way to solve this problem without shuting down the computer (which also takes ages...). Thank you for helping. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
btrfs or ext4
Bonjour, I try to build a home nas to make a dlna server for audio, video and pictures. I have 2 disks for the data which I want to be mounted in raid1 (software). I formated the two disks using btrfs (mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid1 /dev/sda /dev/sdb) It works but, up to now, I can't see the advantages of this file system vs ext4 managed by mdadm. One disadvantage is that it seems that monitoring the system is not possible in case of disk failure for instance. Illuminate me with your knowledge. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
nas
Bonjour, Is there a nas install which is fedora based? I tried openmediavault which is debian based but I am not fully convinced. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: smartd log alert
Le 27/12/2020 à 16:41, Matthew Miller a écrit : On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 02:36:54PM +0100, François Patte wrote: /dev/sda [SAT] : Prefailure: Raw_Read_Error_Rate (1) changed to 79, 80, As scary as this seems, this is generally normal. Raw read errors at some fairly low rate (depending on the drive) are expected, and the new drive is just changing from not being used at all to being in use. If you see this go up significantly in the future, then you have a problem. Thank you. What is a "fairly low rate"? And beyond which rate do I have to be scared? Do you know if we can find somewhere what are the rates for different drive at the beginning of their life? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: smartd log alert
Le 27/12/2020 à 16:14, Michael Schwendt a écrit : On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 14:36:54 +0100, François Patte wrote: I have this alert in my watchlog report: Have you used the smartctl tool from the smartmontools package yet as to examine SMART data and perhaps run self-tests? These line are from the logwatch report under the smartd section. smartctl -x gives the same result, plus a lot of things... -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
smartd log alert
Bonjour, I have this alert in my watchlog report: /dev/sda [SAT] : Prefailure: Raw_Read_Error_Rate (1) changed to 79, 80, Usage: Airflow_Temperature_Cel (190) changed to 71, 70, 71, 70, 71, 70, 69, 70, 71, 70, 71, Usage: Hardware_ECC_Recovered (195) changed to 79, 80, Usage: Temperature_Celsius (194) changed to 29, 30, 29, 30, 29, 30, 31, 30, 29, 30, 29, And same for /dev/sdb These disks are new (I installed them this week). What does the message mean? Do I have to send theses disks back? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
problem with NVMe disk at install
Bonjour, I want to install fedora 33 on NVMe SSD disks and I have 2 such devices but anaconda sees only one of them... I can see both in the bios. Is there a solution to this problem? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bios configuration to install fedora-33
Le 22/12/2020 à 15:41, Jorge Fábregas a écrit : On 12/22/20 5:23 AM, François Patte wrote: What is the right config in the bios to perform a linux install with these "new" motherboard. Hi, There's nothing special really. Either you boot in UEFI mode or Legacy mode (appears as "CSM" in firmware options). If you choose UEFI, then there's the secure-boot option ...but regardless it should boot fine as Fedora is properly signed. Could there be a problem with the media? Did you try the full DVD iso? I tried and could start the installation but, new problem occurs! See my new post. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
bios configuration to install fedora-33
Bonjour, I am struggling with a motherboard (Asus prime B360M-A) to install fedora 33 (Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-33-1.2.iso). At boot time, I can see the menu: Install Fedora 33 Test this media... troubleshooting But that's all... nothing happens if I choose any of these entries. What is the right config in the bios to perform a linux install with these "new" motherboard. Thank you for any help. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
thunderbird 78 and openpgp
Bonjour, I followed the instructions given by Ed. Greshko in the thread "f32 thunderbird broken?" and could connect to my mail box. Thank you. But I don't understand what I did and what was the problem... Thunderbird told me to say goodbye to enigmail and I followed the instructions to export/import my pgp keys. Now, when I send a message I am no longer asked to enter my passphrase as I used to do with enigmail. Is it normal? Secondly, I sent me some test messages and it seems to me that they are not signed in spite of the fact that I configured thunderbird to use my pgp key to send messages. Is it normal? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf OpenPGP_0x744E82D9D855D895.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: f32:: thunderbird broken?
Le 13/10/2020 à 11:02, Adrian Sevcenco a écrit : > Hi! It seem that thunderbird-78.3.1-1.fc32.x86_64 is broken, meaning > that cannot connect and sync IMAP accounts.. > as soon as i downgrade to thunderbird-68.6.0-1.fc32.x86_64 everythings > works again without problems. > > Nobody noticed this so far? Same here I immediately downgraded to 68 version and exclude TB from upgrade in dnf conf file until I read somewhere that this issue is over. Moreover the interface of version 78 is ugly... And when I got back to version 68, language pack French was lost as enigmail... So downgrade is not complete... Hope that I have not to change my mail reader!! Regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
system-upgrade
Bonjour, I have a computer which runs fedora 29, may I use dnf system-upgrade to upgrade to fedora 32? Thank you. If not, what is the safer way to upgrade? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-from-the-fsf signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: usual torment after updating firefox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 25/06/2020 à 19:54, Samuel Sieb a écrit : > On 6/25/20 9:16 AM, François Patte wrote: >> I updated my firefox and, as usual, the syntax to configure the >> place of the tab bar has changed So, my tab bar is at the top >> of all bars and I want it just above the tabs themselves... > > Are you using some custom css rules to do this? That's entirely at > your own risk. What is the "risk"? For what reason this is no more working? - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAl71/7AACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUJAgCgziYHQg7oBh3bW3qdyHJE92oL O9AAn1jlXWd5ysqwOC+xBLW/zHUBrNZP =5l/d -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
