Re: OpenOffice and Fedora

2011-06-04 Thread Bill Davidsen
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 13:05:47 -0400,
Bill Davidsendavid...@tmr.com  wrote:

 It seems that the future of OO is not so bleak as was originally
 thought. OO is now handed to Apache, with the support of Oracle and IBM,
 as well as others.

 http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/060211-faq-whats-the-future-of.html?source=NWWNLE_nlt_daily_am_2011-06-03
  
 Apache hasn't officially accepted the project yet. That is a multistep process
 and is just getting started.


Noted, and thanks for clarifying that. The link below seems to indicate 
that Apache is in favor of this, and I'm sure Oracle didn't just toss 
this over the wall without checking to see if Apache was receptive to 
accepting the project.

http://www.networkworld.com/community/apache-president-jim-jagielski-talks-openoffice-org?source=NWWNLE_nlt_daily_pm_2011-06-03

Clearly this is a developing story, I just wanted to make the point that 
having two projects may thin the resources and reduce the progress of 
either. I'd like to believe that won't happen, but I suspect it will.

-- 
Bill Davidsendavid...@tmr.com
   We are not out of the woods yet, but we know the direction and have
taken the first step. The steps are many, but finite in number, and if
we persevere we will reach our destination.  -me, 2010



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OpenOffice and Fedora

2011-06-04 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:07, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote:
 Clearly this is a developing story, I just wanted to make the point that
 having two projects may thin the resources and reduce the progress of
 either. I'd like to believe that won't happen, but I suspect it will.


After all, the small group of vocal anti-Oracle guys led by Novell´s
Meeks reached their goal: killing the for-profit Staroffice commercial
roduct based on OpenOffice.org code (which Oracle had renamed Oracle
Open Office (notice the lack of .org in the name, which was still
developed).

This led to Oracle´s layoff of all its OO.o developers. So Libre
office ends up without half the previous developers. All in the name
of freedom by the small LO minority, of course.

Ubuntu´s Shuttleworth sums it up very nicely here:

http://ho.io/libreoffice

--
Shuttleworth has a fairly serious disagreement with how the
OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice split came about. He said that Sun made a
$100 million gift to the community when it opened up the OpenOffice
code. But a radical faction made the lives of the OpenOffice
developers hell by refusing to contribute code under the Sun
agreement. That eventually led to the split, but furthermore led
Oracle to finally decide to stop OpenOffice development and lay off
100 employees. He contends that the pace of development for
LibreOffice is not keeping up with what OpenOffice was able to achieve
and wonders if OpenOffice would have been better off if the
factionalists hadn't won.

There is a pathological lack of understanding among some parts of
the community about what companies bring to the table, he said. People
fear and mistrust the companies on one hand, while asking where can I
get a job in free software? on the other. Companies bring jobs, he
said. There is a lot of ideological claptrap that permeates the
community and, while it is reasonable to be cautious about the motives
of companies, avoiding them entirely is not rational.
--

FC
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OpenOffice and Fedora

2011-06-04 Thread Miroslaw Baran
On 4 June 2011 20:11, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:07, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote:
  Clearly this is a developing story, I just wanted to make the point that
  having two projects may thin the resources and reduce the progress of
  either. I'd like to believe that won't happen, but I suspect it will.


 After all, the small group of vocal anti-Oracle guys led by Novell´s
 Meeks reached their goal: killing the for-profit Staroffice commercial
 roduct based on OpenOffice.org code (which Oracle had renamed Oracle
 Open Office (notice the lack of .org in the name, which was still
 developed).


Oh, look, it's Oracle's Mr. Cassia with his FUD again!

Dear sir, this time it took much too long for you to react properly; please
make sure that you react faster, as it is proper and required from you.

[And please do work your story better; either Mr Meeks and his ghastly
Novell troops are puny and insignificant – and unable to develop any
software in a reasonable way OR they are so TERRIBLY COMPETENT, that even a
huge corporation like Oracle was not able to compete with them and had to
dissolve their brilliant troop of OpenOffice programmers; you can't really
have this both ways and sound credible, you know.]

Sincerely
Miroslaw Baran
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OpenOffice and Fedora

2011-06-04 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 16:36, Miroslaw Baran miroslaw.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
 that even a huge corporation like Oracle

I´m not affiliated in any way with Oracle Corp.
I´m a freelance journalist struggling to make ends meet.

I was just a happy OpenOffice.org user and saw nothing wrong with
Contributor Agreements by Sun Microsystems. A vocal small group of
developers, led by Novel´s Mr. Meeks (by the way, Oracle is an evil
corporation, and what is Novell? a not-for profit venture? Did Novell
sign patent agreements with Microsoft? Did Novell promote Microsoft´s
.Net with its Mono venture? yes? no? Did Novell develop patches for
Microsoft´s OO-XML or not?).

In fact, I did purchase StarOffice, as a way to promote OpenOffice.org
development. (after all, it was Sun who footed the bill of most
OpenOffice.org programmers).

So is Canonical´s Shuttleworth an agent of Orace corp, as well, when
he says He contends that the pace of development for LibreOffice is
not keeping up with what OpenOffice was able to achieve and wonders if
OpenOffice would have been better off if the factionalists hadn't
won. 

I´m sure Shuttleworth has a lot more credibility and inside
knowledge than me, I´m sure.

What I do know are the facts... there was a commercial product
(StarOffice) based on the FOSS OpenOffice.org, and now there is no
more. There were 50 devs on ORCL´s payroll working on OpenOffice.org
and now there are no more. There were big plans for the commercial
build of OO.o (StarOffice, renamed Oracle Open Office and developed
in parallel with the Oo.o base) and now there´s no more. Thank you!
LibreeOffice freedom fighters!

In fact I downloaded the automatic upgrade from Sun StarOffice 9 to
Oracle Open Office (built on Oracle´s OO.o 3.3 base) and it included a
bunch of new connectors and plug-ins between Oo.o and a wide range of
Oracle commercial software. You know, the kind of stuff that
Corporations would have loved and have surely bought, increasing the
profits and encouraging more devs on OpenOffice.org footed by Evil
Oracle.

But you know what? you win... applying a bit of doublespeak from
1984... less is more... defeat is winning... fork is king... Novell
does wonders (just look at how they sank their company), and Mono
rules.

FC
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OpenOffice and Fedora

2011-06-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 13:05:47 -0400,
  Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote:
 It seems that the future of OO is not so bleak as was originally 
 thought. OO is now handed to Apache, with the support of Oracle and IBM, 
 as well as others.
 
 http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/060211-faq-whats-the-future-of.html?source=NWWNLE_nlt_daily_am_2011-06-03

Apache hasn't officially accepted the project yet. That is a multistep process
and is just getting started.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines