Re: reporting on BZ for texlive-IEEEtran
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:59:36 -0400 Tom Horsleywrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:47:22 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > However, it appears that on BZ there is no entry to list it under. > > It isn't documented anywhere, but the redhat bugzilla categories > all correspond to whatever source RPM originated the file in question. > > Since the Source RPM is texlive, then the plain old texlive name is the > one to use to report things. > > P.S. The only way to discover this is to report things in the wrong > category and get chewed out because "everyone knows" that the categories > correspond to the source RPMs :-). OK, thanks! I have reported under texlive but so far no one has taken the bait:-) Ranjan FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: reporting on BZ for texlive-IEEEtran
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:47:22 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > However, it appears that on BZ there is no entry to list it under. It isn't documented anywhere, but the redhat bugzilla categories all correspond to whatever source RPM originated the file in question. So, for example: tomh> rpm -q -i -f /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/IEEEtran Name: texlive-base Epoch : 4 Version : 2014 Release : 19.20140525_r34255.fc23 Architecture: noarch Install Date: Mon 22 Feb 2016 07:21:37 AM EST Group : Applications/Publishing Size: 7737537 License : Artistic 2.0 and GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and LPPL and MIT and Public Domain and UCD and Utopia Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 17 Feb 2016 10:52:33 AM EST, Key ID 32474cf834ec9cba Source RPM : texlive-2014-19.20140525_r34255.fc23.src.rpm Build Date : Tue 16 Feb 2016 05:15:10 PM EST Build Host : arm01-builder10.arm.fedoraproject.org Relocations : (not relocatable) Packager: Fedora Project Vendor : Fedora Project URL : http://tug.org/texlive/ Summary : TeX Live filesystem, metadata and licenses shipped in text form Description : TeX Live licenses shipped in text form. Since the Source RPM is texlive, then the plain old texlive name is the one to use to report things. P.S. The only way to discover this is to report things in the wrong category and get chewed out because "everyone knows" that the categories correspond to the source RPMs :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
reporting on BZ for texlive-IEEEtran
Hi, I wanted to report on Bugzilla that the IEEEtran style file was quite outdated and needed an update. However, it appears that on BZ there is no entry to list it under. The only choices I get there are: texlive-extension, texlive-texmf and texlive-texmf-errata and texlive itself. It is in the Fedora 23 updates repo so I am confused how to file it. The updated cls (yes, I know I can get it down on my own and use it, and that is what I am doing now) is at http://www.ctan.org/pkg/ieeetran Many thanks, Ranjan -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org