Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:18:07 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > It appears that i may have accidentally (and completely) messed up my spec > file. Without the original spec file, the problem is no longer reproducible. > Though the two rpms were successfully created and had the oddity with the > spec file (that worked). > > I will have to work on recreating a spec file. The archive wbar-2.3.5.tar.bz2 you use includes precompiled files (object files and executables). If you created it yourself, try again after "make clean". If you didn't create it, run "make clean" or something equivalent in %prep or %build. That will fix your 32-bit/64-bit build issue. It doesn't fix the other mistakes in the spec file. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
Thank, Mike! On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:34:06 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:57:55 -0800, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > Sorry, my mistake: I have a newer version of wbar (which I modified, so I > > called it as version 2.3.5). Is there a place I can upload this bz2? fpaste > > does not like binaries. > > dropbox e.g. Thanks! I was wondering if fedora has a site, I guess not. I will post there and invite you over. > Usually I spot lots of mistakes just by skimming over a spec file > (and there are several in your package), but I would like to focus on > your particular build problem instead. Without the used source archive, > I can't comment on your build problem. > > That's all you get? It looks like empty %prep, empty %build and %empty > install sections -> a completely broken spec file. It appears that i may have accidentally (and completely) messed up my spec file. Without the original spec file, the problem is no longer reproducible. Though the two rpms were successfully created and had the oddity with the spec file (that worked). I will have to work on recreating a spec file. Thanks again! Best wishes, Ranjan FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:54:05PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:24:22 +0200 Suvayu Ali > wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:08:25PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:56:29 +0100 James Hogarth > > > wrote: > > > > > > > What is the behaviour using mock instead so that you have a nice clean > > > > build environment? > > > > > > I am sorry but how does one use mock? I have never used it before, sorry. > > > > You can start by adapting the attached script. I used this to maintain > > a local yum repo before Fedora copr came along. > > > > Thanks, Suvayu! Do I need any additional packages to get started? # yum install mock should do it. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:57:55 -0800, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > Sorry, my mistake: I have a newer version of wbar (which I modified, so I > called it as version 2.3.5). Is there a place I can upload this bz2? fpaste > does not like binaries. > dropbox e.g. > I have uploaded a new spec file to fpaste (to correct for this change): > > fpaste wbar.spec > Uploading (1.8KiB)... > http://ur1.ca/k6knt -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211298/13313142 Usually I spot lots of mistakes just by skimming over a spec file (and there are several in your package), but I would like to focus on your particular build problem instead. Without the used source archive, I can't comment on your build problem. > > Can you upload your full rpmbuild output to some place? > > My rpmbuild on this machine is giving me problems now (sorry!). I can't tell > what the problems are because it seems to add a release number to the > directory name upon unpacking. > > $ rpmbuild -ba wbar.spec > Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.cYwV45 > Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ehsq8s > Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0FuscQ That's all you get? It looks like empty %prep, empty %build and %empty install sections -> a completely broken spec file. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 21:24:22 +0200 Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:08:25PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:56:29 +0100 James Hogarth > > wrote: > > > > > What is the behaviour using mock instead so that you have a nice clean > > > build environment? > > > > I am sorry but how does one use mock? I have never used it before, sorry. > > You can start by adapting the attached script. I used this to maintain > a local yum repo before Fedora copr came along. > Thanks, Suvayu! Do I need any additional packages to get started? Best wishes, Ranjan FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:08:25PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:56:29 +0100 James Hogarth
> wrote:
>
> > What is the behaviour using mock instead so that you have a nice clean
> > build environment?
>
> I am sorry but how does one use mock? I have never used it before, sorry.
You can start by adapting the attached script. I used this to maintain
a local yum repo before Fedora copr came along.
Hope this helps,
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
#!/bin/bash
# set -o xtrace
if [[ $# -lt 1 ]]; then
echo "Insufficient arguments"
echo "Usage: $ ${0##*/} [mock options]"
exit 1
fi
declare package="$1" rpmbuildroot=~/rpmbuild outdir
declare tmpdir=$(mktemp -d --tmpdir=/tmp mock_rpms_${UID}_)
declare mockargs="${@:2}"
# open log file
exec > >(tee $tmpdir/$package.log)
exec 2>&1
# Create directory tree
echo "Creating mock output dir tree"
declare outdir=/opt/local-repo
mkdir -p $outdir/{SRPMS,RPMS}
touch $tmpdir/timestamp
# SRPM
echo "Building SRPM"
mock -v $mockargs --resultdir=$outdir/SRPMS --buildsrpm \
--spec $rpmbuildroot/SPECS/$package.spec \
--source $rpmbuildroot/SOURCES
declare srpm=$(find $outdir -newer $tmpdir/timestamp -name "*\.src\.rpm")
# RPM
echo "Building RPM"
mock -v $mockargs --resultdir=$outdir/RPMS --rebuild $srpm
rm -vrf $outdir/RPMS/*src.rpm
echo "Done"
# --resultdir accepts python options from config
# e.g.: =~/mock/"%(dist)s"/"%(target_arch)s"/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:56:29 +0100 James Hogarth wrote: > On 15 Apr 2015 16:58, "Ranjan Maitra" wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: mschwe...@gmail.com > > > Sent: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:39:07 +0200 > > > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Subject: Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20) > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:03:58 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > > > >> So, I have the strangest of problems. > > >> > > >> I create an rpm of wbar available in the spec file uploaded here: > > >> > > >> $ fpaste wbar.spec > > >> Uploading (1.7KiB)... > > >> http://ur1.ca/k6jqw -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211235/29102744 > > > > > > The Source0 in that spec file gives 404 not found. > > > Which means I could not examine the source code you used. Perhaps it > > > contains precompiled files? > > > > Sorry, my mistake: I have a newer version of wbar (which I modified, so I > called it as version 2.3.5). Is there a place I can upload this bz2? fpaste > does not like binaries. > > > > I have uploaded a new spec file to fpaste (to correct for this change): > > > > fpaste wbar.spec > > Uploading (1.8KiB)... > > http://ur1.ca/k6knt -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211298/13313142 > > > > > > > > > Can you upload your full rpmbuild output to some place? > > > > My rpmbuild on this machine is giving me problems now (sorry!). I can't > tell what the problems are because it seems to add a release number to the > directory name upon unpacking. > > What is the behaviour using mock instead so that you have a nice clean > build environment? I am sorry but how does one use mock? I have never used it before, sorry. Best wishes, Ranjan FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks & orcas on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On 15 Apr 2015 16:58, "Ranjan Maitra" wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: mschwe...@gmail.com > > Sent: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:39:07 +0200 > > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Subject: Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20) > > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:03:58 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > >> So, I have the strangest of problems. > >> > >> I create an rpm of wbar available in the spec file uploaded here: > >> > >> $ fpaste wbar.spec > >> Uploading (1.7KiB)... > >> http://ur1.ca/k6jqw -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211235/29102744 > > > > The Source0 in that spec file gives 404 not found. > > Which means I could not examine the source code you used. Perhaps it > > contains precompiled files? > > Sorry, my mistake: I have a newer version of wbar (which I modified, so I called it as version 2.3.5). Is there a place I can upload this bz2? fpaste does not like binaries. > > I have uploaded a new spec file to fpaste (to correct for this change): > > fpaste wbar.spec > Uploading (1.8KiB)... > http://ur1.ca/k6knt -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211298/13313142 > > > > > Can you upload your full rpmbuild output to some place? > > My rpmbuild on this machine is giving me problems now (sorry!). I can't tell what the problems are because it seems to add a release number to the directory name upon unpacking. What is the behaviour using mock instead so that you have a nice clean build environment? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
> -Original Message- > From: mschwe...@gmail.com > Sent: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:39:07 +0200 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20) > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:03:58 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > >> So, I have the strangest of problems. >> >> I create an rpm of wbar available in the spec file uploaded here: >> >> $ fpaste wbar.spec >> Uploading (1.7KiB)... >> http://ur1.ca/k6jqw -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211235/29102744 > > The Source0 in that spec file gives 404 not found. > Which means I could not examine the source code you used. Perhaps it > contains precompiled files? Sorry, my mistake: I have a newer version of wbar (which I modified, so I called it as version 2.3.5). Is there a place I can upload this bz2? fpaste does not like binaries. I have uploaded a new spec file to fpaste (to correct for this change): fpaste wbar.spec Uploading (1.8KiB)... http://ur1.ca/k6knt -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211298/13313142 > Can you upload your full rpmbuild output to some place? My rpmbuild on this machine is giving me problems now (sorry!). I can't tell what the problems are because it seems to add a release number to the directory name upon unpacking. $ rpmbuild -ba wbar.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.cYwV45 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ehsq8s Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0FuscQ Processing files: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 error: Directory not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/etc/bash_completion.d error: File not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/etc/wbar.d error: Directory not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/locale error: Directory not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/man/es error: File not found by glob: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/bin/* error: Directory not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/wbar error: File not found by glob: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/man/man1/* error: File not found by glob: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/pixmaps/* error: File not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/xsessions/wbar.desktop Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ydtKjd error: File not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/doc/wbar RPM build errors: Directory not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/etc/bash_completion.d File not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/etc/wbar.d Directory not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/locale Directory not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/man/es File not found by glob: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/bin/* Directory not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/wbar File not found by glob: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/man/man1/* File not found by glob: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/pixmaps/* File not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/xsessions/wbar.desktop File not found: /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64/usr/share/doc/wbar Many thanks, Ranjan FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks & orcas on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
> -Original Message- > From: j.p...@tesco.net > Sent: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:12:36 +0100 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20) > > On 15/04/15 14:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: >> So, I have the strangest of problems. >> >> I create an rpm of wbar available in the spec file uploaded here: >> >> $ fpaste wbar.spec >> Uploading (1.7KiB)... >> http://ur1.ca/k6jqw -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211235/29102744 >> >> and have a strange problem on F21. The x86_64 rpm created on F20 has no >> issues: >> > >> >> >> But the same rpm using the same spec file created using the same command >> (rpmbuild -bb wbar.spec) on F21, when installed wants to bring in all >> these i686 rpms as dependencies. I was wondering what is causing these >> issues and how to get around them? >> > > Perhaps they're already installed in f20? No, I am installing both rpms on F21 (and btw, the i686's were not pulled in on F20 either). Ranjan Can't remember your password? Do you need a strong and secure password? Use Password manager! It stores your passwords & protects your account. Check it out at http://mysecurelogon.com/password-manager -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:03:58 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > So, I have the strangest of problems. > > I create an rpm of wbar available in the spec file uploaded here: > > $ fpaste wbar.spec > Uploading (1.7KiB)... > http://ur1.ca/k6jqw -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211235/29102744 The Source0 in that spec file gives 404 not found. Which means I could not examine the source code you used. Perhaps it contains precompiled files? Can you upload your full rpmbuild output to some place? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
On 15/04/15 14:03, Ranjan Maitra wrote: So, I have the strangest of problems. I create an rpm of wbar available in the spec file uploaded here: $ fpaste wbar.spec Uploading (1.7KiB)... http://ur1.ca/k6jqw -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211235/29102744 and have a strange problem on F21. The x86_64 rpm created on F20 has no issues: But the same rpm using the same spec file created using the same command (rpmbuild -bb wbar.spec) on F21, when installed wants to bring in all these i686 rpms as dependencies. I was wondering what is causing these issues and how to get around them? Perhaps they're already installed in f20? .. but I'm having rpmbuild problems in f21 too, trying to rebuild an srpm that worked in SL7 John P -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
rpmbuild oddity on F21 (but not F20)
So, I have the strangest of problems. I create an rpm of wbar available in the spec file uploaded here: $ fpaste wbar.spec Uploading (1.7KiB)... http://ur1.ca/k6jqw -> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211235/29102744 and have a strange problem on F21. The x86_64 rpm created on F20 has no issues: cd x86_64/ maitra@alakananda 08:00:41~$ sudo yum localinstall wbar-2.3.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks Examining wbar-2.3.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc20.x86_64 Marking wbar-2.3.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm to be installed Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package wbar.x86_64 0:2.3.5-1.fc20 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved Package ArchVersion Repository Size Installing: wbar x86_64 2.3.5-1.fc20/wbar-2.3.5-1.fc20.x86_64 298 k Transaction Summary Install 1 Package Total size: 298 k Installed size: 298 k Is this ok [y/d/N]: But the same rpm using the same spec file created using the same command (rpmbuild -bb wbar.spec) on F21, when installed wants to bring in all these i686 rpms as dependencies. I was wondering what is causing these issues and how to get around them? $ sudo yum localinstall wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks Examining wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 Marking wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm to be installed Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package wbar.x86_64 0:2.3.5-1.fc21 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libImlib2.so.1 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * fedora: mirror.steadfast.net * rpmfusion-free: mirrors.tummy.com * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirrors.tummy.com * rpmfusion-nonfree: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * updates: mirror.steadfast.net http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/X11%3A/QtDesktop/Fedora_21/repodata/03b3f78fdf7fba85bf96c8ee7e37a233f315cec7f86b54aa23aa4277aaead949-primary.xml.gz: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found Trying other mirror. --> Processing Dependency: libX11.so.6 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libatk-1.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libcairo.so.2 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libfontconfig.so.1 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libfreetype.so.6 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgcc_s.so.1 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgio-2.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libglade-2.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libglib-2.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgobject-2.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libm.so.6 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpango-1.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpthread.so.0 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6 for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) for package: wbar-2.3.5-1.fc21.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCX
