Re: [one-users] Why is the OpenNebula 1.4 binary package for Ubuntu in system-wide mode?
Hi, actually, Jeff is right. Ubuntu has its own rules about where should the files go, that's why the OpenNebula 1.4 Ubuntu package is in system-wide mode. The reason why we changed to self-contained for 2.0 is simply because since we are doing the packaging ourselves, it was easier to do it in the self-contained mode. Nevertheless we are going to follow Jeff's advice and for the next beta releases and the final release we will create the Ubuntu package in system-wide mode. cheers, Jaime On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Jeff Williams wrote: > I would guess because the ubuntu packaging standards have rules about where > everything should be put. This way, someone familiar with Ubuntu will know > where to find things and bin files will be in their path etc. > > The 2.0 beta ubuntu package is in the self-contained mode and I would have > much preferred the system wide! > > Jeff > > > On 12/08/2010, at 4:27 PM, Tobias Weikard wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've got a small question. In the documentation from OpenNebula 1.4 ( > http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel1.4:plan) is described, that the > preferred installation mode is the self-contained mode. > > > > But the Ubunutu binary packaged available at > http://downloads.dsa-research.org/opennebula/ubuntu-one-1.4.0 is packaged > in the system-wide mode. Why isn't it provided in the self-contained mode? > Is there any reason? > > > > Thanks, > > Tobias > > ___ > > Users mailing list > > Users@lists.opennebula.org > > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Strange behavior of ONE + EC2 API when using port forwaring
Hi Christian, the way authentication works is by creating a "canonical string" which includes the server port and matching it with your connection parameters. Therefore if the port of the client differs from the one of the server it will probably fail. Can you change line 77 of EC2QueryServer.rb: @server_po...@config[:port] => @server_port=8188 Can you test that? If that works we could create a fix using environment variables. Regards, Jaime On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Christian Baun wrote: > Hi, > > I try using the EC2 API with boto[1], a Python interface to Amazon Web > Services. > The oned and econe server are up an running. > > When I try to access the econe server via Port 4567, it is working without > problems. I send a request for a list of instances and econe-server.log > says: > > 84.161.122.172 - - [12/Aug/2010 16:17:30] "GET > /?AWSAccessKeyId=oneadmin&Action=DescribeInstances&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256&SignatureVersion=2&Timestamp=2010-08-12T14%3A17%3A31&Version=2010-06-15&Signature=t9jOxhD3TYAmNCzDpuuFrsSDQ2BItvzDdJjNxGdoye8%3D > HTTP/1.1" 200 1335 0.0377 > > It simply works. > > The problem: For several reasons I need access to ONE via the EC2 API over > port 8188. > > I did a port forwarding via: > iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 8188 -j ACCEPT > iptables -I PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 8188 -j REDIRECT > --to-port 4567 > > the econe server can now be reached via 8188: > > telnet 141.52.167.35 8188 > Trying 141.52.167.35... > Connected to 141.52.167.35. > Escape character is '^]'. > > But when I send a request for a list of instances, the result is: > > boto.exception.EC2ResponseError: EC2ResponseError: 400 Bad Request > AuthFailureUser not > authorized0 > > and econe-server.log says: > > 84.161.122.172 - - [12/Aug/2010 16:20:24] "GET > /?AWSAccessKeyId=oneadmin&Action=DescribeInstances&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256&SignatureVersion=2&Timestamp=2010-08-12T14%3A20%3A25&Version=2010-06-15&Signature=DRA%2BiKREW2MFyARp%2Bxk3JWKrFBFFnJldRISauZ%2Bz6cc%3D > HTTP/1.1" 400 139 0.0042 > > Is this a known issue? > > The econe.conf has this values: > ONE_XMLRPC=http://localhost:2633/RPC2 > SERVER=141.52.167.35 > PORT=4567 > VM_TYPE=[NAME=m1.small, TEMPLATE=m1.small.erb] > USER=... > PASSWORD=... > IMAGE_DIR=/srv/cloud/images > > When I change in econe.conf to Port 8188 and the server vaule to a FQDN the > econe server is not starting. These are the only vaules that allow me to > start the econe server. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance for any help > >Christian > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/boto/ > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] mkswap doesn't include "-L SWAP" option
Hi Dan, that's a very good idea. I have included it in issue 255, and it will be part of the 2.0 final release: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/255 Thanks for your great feedback! cheers, Jaime On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Dan Yocum wrote: > Hi, > > I have noticed that my VM image doesn't automatically add the swap that is > created during the instantiation process. > > I propose that this should be solved by creating the swap partition with > the label of "SWAP" which then can be used in the VM /etc/fstab to specify > the swap partition. For example, this will be the line in the VM fstab: > > LABEL=SWAP swapswapdefaults0 0 > > The scripts that need to be changed are ~oneadmin/lib/*/tm_mkswap.sh and > simply add the "-L SWAP" option to the mkswap command. > > Dan > > -- > Dan Yocum > Fermilab 630.840.6509 > yo...@fnal.gov, http://fermigrid.fnal.gov > "I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things." > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] /sbin/mkfs not available in a non-interactive bash sessions
Hi Dan, you're very right. We have an open issue to solve that problem: http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/255 Thanks for your feedback! cheers, Jaime On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Dan Yocum wrote: > > > On 08/10/2010 02:51 PM, Dan Yocum wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> mkfs can not be found when attempting to ssh to a worker node to create >> a FS. This is a limitation of a non-interactive bash session. If /sbin >> is in the oneadmin PATH env var, then mkfs is available to the user, but >> only during interactive (i.e., login) sessions. >> >> To remedy this, the full path to the executable must be specified - >> /sbin/mkfs. Here is the error I get: >> >> Fri Jul 30 13:48:35 2010 [TM][D]: Message received: LOG - 35 >> tm_mkimage.sh: ERROR: Command "ssh fcl005 mkfs -t xfs -F >> /srv/cloud/one/var//35/images/disk.2" failed. >> >> Fri Jul 30 13:48:35 2010 [TM][D]: Message received: LOG - 35 >> tm_mkimage.sh: ERROR: bash: mkfs: command not found >> >> Fri Jul 30 13:48:35 2010 [TM][D]: Message received: TRANSFER FAILURE 35 >> bash: mkfs: command not found >> >> I'd like to fix this in the interim - where can I find this and specify >> the full path? >> > > Found it - it's in ~oneadmin/lib/tm_commands/*/tm_mkimage.sh > > > Dan > > > -- > Dan Yocum > Fermilab 630.840.6509 > yo...@fnal.gov, http://fermigrid.fnal.gov > "I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things." > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] OpenNebula 2.0 beta - Hybfridfox and Euca2ools
Hi, Has anybody gotten these tools to work properly with the beta 2.0 version? I am able to login through the EC2 interface using Hybridfox. I can see my running instances but all the other tabs are empty. However, when I try to use the euca2ools using the same endpoint and credentials, I get an "AuthFailure: User not authorized" error. Any ideas? -Ricky ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] mkswap doesn't include "-L SWAP" option
Hi, I have noticed that my VM image doesn't automatically add the swap that is created during the instantiation process. I propose that this should be solved by creating the swap partition with the label of "SWAP" which then can be used in the VM /etc/fstab to specify the swap partition. For example, this will be the line in the VM fstab: LABEL=SWAP swapswapdefaults0 0 The scripts that need to be changed are ~oneadmin/lib/*/tm_mkswap.sh and simply add the "-L SWAP" option to the mkswap command. Dan -- Dan Yocum Fermilab 630.840.6509 yo...@fnal.gov, http://fermigrid.fnal.gov "I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things." ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Strange behavior of ONE + EC2 API when using port forwaring
Hi, I try using the EC2 API with boto[1], a Python interface to Amazon Web Services. The oned and econe server are up an running. When I try to access the econe server via Port 4567, it is working without problems. I send a request for a list of instances and econe-server.log says: 84.161.122.172 - - [12/Aug/2010 16:17:30] "GET /?AWSAccessKeyId=oneadmin&Action=DescribeInstances&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256&SignatureVersion=2&Timestamp=2010-08-12T14%3A17%3A31&Version=2010-06-15&Signature=t9jOxhD3TYAmNCzDpuuFrsSDQ2BItvzDdJjNxGdoye8%3D HTTP/1.1" 200 1335 0.0377 It simply works. The problem: For several reasons I need access to ONE via the EC2 API over port 8188. I did a port forwarding via: iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 8188 -j ACCEPT iptables -I PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 8188 -j REDIRECT --to-port 4567 the econe server can now be reached via 8188: telnet 141.52.167.35 8188 Trying 141.52.167.35... Connected to 141.52.167.35. Escape character is '^]'. But when I send a request for a list of instances, the result is: boto.exception.EC2ResponseError: EC2ResponseError: 400 Bad Request AuthFailureUser not authorized0 and econe-server.log says: 84.161.122.172 - - [12/Aug/2010 16:20:24] "GET /?AWSAccessKeyId=oneadmin&Action=DescribeInstances&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256&SignatureVersion=2&Timestamp=2010-08-12T14%3A20%3A25&Version=2010-06-15&Signature=DRA%2BiKREW2MFyARp%2Bxk3JWKrFBFFnJldRISauZ%2Bz6cc%3D HTTP/1.1" 400 139 0.0042 Is this a known issue? The econe.conf has this values: ONE_XMLRPC=http://localhost:2633/RPC2 SERVER=141.52.167.35 PORT=4567 VM_TYPE=[NAME=m1.small, TEMPLATE=m1.small.erb] USER=... PASSWORD=... IMAGE_DIR=/srv/cloud/images When I change in econe.conf to Port 8188 and the server vaule to a FQDN the econe server is not starting. These are the only vaules that allow me to start the econe server. Any ideas? Thanks in advance for any help Christian [1] http://code.google.com/p/boto/ ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Compiling Error: "Error calling pkg-config xmlrpc_server_abyss++ --static --libs"
Hi Viktor, are you still experiencing this? Do you have by chance an http proxy configured? Regards, Jaime On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mauch, Viktor wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I use Ubuntu 10.04 server und get always this error Messages: > > > $scons > ... > Error calling pkg-config xmlrpc_server_abyss++ --static --libs > ... > Error calling pkg-config xmlrpc_client++ xmlrpc++ --libs > ... > > During the compiling. At the end the scons command give me a success > message: > > scons: done reading SConscript files. > scons: Building targets ... > scons: `.' is up to date. > scons: done building targets. > > But afterwards I'm not able to boot a VM, in the sched.log there is > always this error message: > > "[SCHED][E]: Exception raised: Unable to transport XML to server and get > XML response back. HTTP response: 503" > > I think it has something to do with the compiling error message. Can > anyone help me. > > Before the compiling procedure I've installed all "xmlrpc-c*" packages > which come with Ubuntu 10.04 server. > > > Thank you in advance > > Greets > > Viktor > > > > -- > Dipl.-Phys. Viktor Mauch > Steinbuch Centre for Computing (SCC) > http://www.scc.kit.edu/ > > Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) > Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1 > D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen > > Phone: +49(0)7247 82-8721 > eMail: ma...@kit.edu > > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Getting authenticating errors!!!
Hi, I have install nebula in /opt/ as root user "install.sh -d /opt/oneN" Now I starting /opt/oneN/bin/one start And getting this error. #/opt/oneN/bin/oneuser list Error: [UserPoolInfo] User couldn't be authenticated, aborting call. Not able to run any command Pls help Thankx The contents of this email, including the attachments, are PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL to the intended recipient at the email address to which it has been addressed. If you receive it in error, please notify the sender immediately by return email and then permanently delete it from your system. The unauthorized use, distribution, copying or alteration of this email, including the attachments, is strictly forbidden. Thank you. Please note that neither MakeMyTrip nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of MakeMyTrip by means of email communications. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Why is the OpenNebula 1.4 binary package for Ubuntu in system-wide mode?
I would guess because the ubuntu packaging standards have rules about where everything should be put. This way, someone familiar with Ubuntu will know where to find things and bin files will be in their path etc. The 2.0 beta ubuntu package is in the self-contained mode and I would have much preferred the system wide! Jeff On 12/08/2010, at 4:27 PM, Tobias Weikard wrote: > Hi, > I've got a small question. In the documentation from OpenNebula 1.4 > (http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel1.4:plan) is described, that the > preferred installation mode is the self-contained mode. > > But the Ubunutu binary packaged available at > http://downloads.dsa-research.org/opennebula/ubuntu-one-1.4.0 is packaged in > the system-wide mode. Why isn't it provided in the self-contained mode? Is > there any reason? > > Thanks, > Tobias > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] the vm'state always boot
hello!I want to ask that opennebula support vmware server 2.0.2 by vi sdk 2.5？ I installed vmware server2.0.2，and then when I onehost create，the oned.log always say monitoring host . when deploy vm,the vm'state alwayes be "boot". the host' state: INFORMATION ID: 1 NAME : 202.117.10.192 STATE : MONITORING IM_MAD: im_vmware VM_MAD: vmm_vmware TM_MAD: tm_vmware HOST SHARES MAX MEM : 0 USED MEM (REAL) : 0 USED MEM (ALLOCATED) : 0 MAX CPU : 0 USED CPU (REAL) : 0 USED CPU (ALLOCATED) : 0 RUNNING VMS : 0 the vm'state: ID USER NAME STAT CPU MEMHOSTNAMETIME 9 oneadmin VM2 boot 0 0 202.117.10.192 00 00:04:35 the $ONE_LOCATION/var/oned.log: Thu Aug 12 18:49:03 2010 [InM][I]: Monitoring host 202.117.10.192 (0) Thu Aug 12 18:49:04 2010 [InM][E]: Information driver crashed, recovering... Thu Aug 12 18:50:03 2010 [InM][I]: Monitoring host 202.117.10.192 (0) Thu Aug 12 18:50:04 2010 [InM][E]: Information driver crashed, recovering... Thu Aug 12 18:51:03 2010 [InM][I]: Monitoring host 202.117.10.192 (0) thank you very much!___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] hello
hello!I want to ask that opennebula support vmware server 2.0.2 by vi sdk 2.5？ I installed vmware server2.0.2，and then when I onehost create，the oned.log always say monitoring host . when deploy vm,the vm'state alwayes be "boot". the host' state: INFORMATION ID: 1 NAME : 202.117.10.192 STATE : MONITORING IM_MAD: im_vmware VM_MAD: vmm_vmware TM_MAD: tm_vmware HOST SHARES MAX MEM : 0 USED MEM (REAL) : 0 USED MEM (ALLOCATED) : 0 MAX CPU : 0 USED CPU (REAL) : 0 USED CPU (ALLOCATED) : 0 RUNNING VMS : 0 the vm'state: ID USER NAME STAT CPU MEMHOSTNAMETIME 9 oneadmin VM2 boot 0 0 202.117.10.192 00 00:04:35 the $ONE_LOCATION/var/oned.log: Thu Aug 12 18:49:03 2010 [InM][I]: Monitoring host 202.117.10.192 (0) Thu Aug 12 18:49:04 2010 [InM][E]: Information driver crashed, recovering... Thu Aug 12 18:50:03 2010 [InM][I]: Monitoring host 202.117.10.192 (0) Thu Aug 12 18:50:04 2010 [InM][E]: Information driver crashed, recovering... Thu Aug 12 18:51:03 2010 [InM][I]: Monitoring host 202.117.10.192 (0) thank you very much! ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] virtualization platform supported ?
Hello, Can you confirm that OpenNebula support these platform ?: VMware vsphere 4.1 Citrix XenServer 5.6 Oracle VM 2.2 RHEV 2.2 thanks ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] reduce monitoring interval doesn't work under 30 seconds?
Hi, I'm using OpenNebula 1.4. I tried to reduce the VM_POLLING_INTERVAL to 10 seconds (in /etc/one/oned.conf. But it seems that the interval can't be smaller than 30 seconds. Is 30 seconds the minimum or how can I reduce the interval? Greetings, Tobias ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Why is the OpenNebula 1.4 binary package for Ubuntu in system-wide mode?
Hi, I've got a small question. In the documentation from OpenNebula 1.4 (http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel1.4:plan) is described, that the preferred installation mode is the self-contained mode. But the Ubunutu binary packaged available at http://downloads.dsa-research.org/opennebula/ubuntu-one-1.4.0 is packaged in the system-wide mode. Why isn't it provided in the self-contained mode? Is there any reason? Thanks, Tobias ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
