Re: [one-users] Database problem with oZones server
That's right. It was a permissions problem. I had tried to run the ozones server as oneadmin before asking for help, but it did not work. The actual problem was that I had run the server the very first time as root, and so root became the owner of the log file, giving problems when running the server as oneadmin later on. I remove the log file, started the server as oneadmin and everything worked. Thanks! Cheers, Humberto FYI On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Tino Vazquez tin...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, This is probably a permissions issue You should run the server as an unprivileged user (like oneadmin). It should have write permissions in VAR_LOCATION, which is: * If ONE_LOCATION is defined, $ONE_LOCATION/var * otherwise, /var/lib/one Regards, -Tino -- Constantino V?zquez Blanco, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org http://www.opennebula.org/ | @tinova79 | @OpenNebula On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Humberto N. Castejon Martinez humca...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to run the oZones sever, but have problems accessing the database. With both, MySQL and SQLite, when I run ozones-server start as root, I get the following error message: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/data_objects-0.10.7/lib/data_objects/connection.rb:79:in `initialize': unable to open database file (DataObjects::Connection$ ... from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.3.5/lib/rack/builder.rb:51:in `initialize' from /usr/lib/one/ozones/config.ru:1:in `new' from /usr/lib/one/ozones/config.ru:1 ~ unable to open database file (code: 14, sql state: , query: , uri: ) Would like to know if I have to configure the database in some specific way, or if I am doing something wrong. Thanks! Cheers, Humberto ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/2017/f71f51ce/attachment-0001.htm -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:20:22 +0100 From: Jaime Melis jme...@opennebula.org To: Erico Augusto Cavalcanti Guedes e...@cin.ufpe.br Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] Doubt about VNet operation Message-ID: CA+HrgRqjwfdf-jMRsm5Vx+RSi+RcOtdaFo4EgbfVaPpLJdq=u...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Erico, take a look at this thread which is currently under discussion: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.opennebula.org/msg04582.html regards, Jaime On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Erico Augusto Cavalcanti Guedes e...@cin.ufpe.br wrote: Dears, when two VMs are running on same Physical Machine under one unique VNet, communication between then are performed without an external device, like a switch, or it is unpredictable that traffic pass through the switch? I read [1], but It was inconclusive. Thanks in advance, Erico. [1] http://www.opennebula.org/_detail/documentation:rel1.4:network-02.png?id=documentation%3Arel3.0%3Avgg ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Cloud Computing www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org -- Message: 4 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:07:48 - From: Jo?o Soares joaosoa...@ua.pt To: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: [one-users] Opennebula 3.0 OpenVSwitch Message-ID: 002301cca553$d0d06a50$72713ef0$@pt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hello, There are two ways of installing OpenVSwitch: with kernel modification; and without it (userspace mode). I was thinking about installing the userspace mode?is there any problem? Is there any difference in terms of Opennebula?s interaction with OVS? Cheers, Jo?o -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/attachments/2017/db476df0/attachment-0001.htm -- ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org End of Users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 35 * ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
Re: [one-users] Happy birthday!
Hello Community, Happy Birthday! OpenNebula. I would suggest OpenNebula guys to change the permalinks on the blog to something like the name of the article. Google index you better that way. http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=2206 - http://blog.opennebula.orghttp://blog.opennebula.org/?p=2206 /four-years-of-the-opennebula-project. Being better indexed in Google could benefit the project, the vibrant community around OpenNebula could grow and that would foster innovation and adoption. All the best, v 2011/11/17 Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org Dear community, OpenNebula is celebrating its birthday, we have been around for 4 years now! You can find some interesting stats in our blog [1]. For instance, this list has seen a great growth in this 4 years: from 227 messages in 2008 to 4,341 in 2011. Regards. [1] http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=2206 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebulahttp://twitter.com/opennebulacmar...@opennebula.org ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org -- network warrior ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] OpenNebula 3.2 pre-release 1
Dear all, Today we announce the general availability of the first pre-release of OpenNebula 3.2. With this release we make our debut with a new development cycle that aims at rapidly delivering new features to the community and faster react to their needs and feedback. The pre-release series are not suitable for production environments as you may find some rough edges. However the packages have gone through the standard testing procedure made for final releases so you should consider them stable. The first pre-release of OpenNebula 3.2 includes important new features and improvements in the security area, and in the management of networks, users and VM images. With this release we also wanted to celebrate our 4th birthday. Happy testing everybody! LINKS [1] Complete release notes: http://www.opennebula.org/software:rnotes:rn-rel3.2s1 [2] Documentation: http://www.opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.2 [3] Download OpenNebula 3.2 pre-release 1 (3.1.0): http://downloads.dsa-research.org/opennebula -- Ruben S. Montero, PhD Project co-Lead and Chief Architect OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | rsmont...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
[one-users] Documentation
Potential Documentation Issues: There are a few documentation issues which can be found here (http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.0:occiug) On the Storage example there are two definitions for the Storage entity, and, for which, one is blank: $ occi-storage --url http://localhost:4567 --username oneadmin --password opennebula create image.xml STORAGE href='http://0.0.0.0:4567/storage/3' /STORAGE STORAGE href='http://localhost:4567/storage/0' ID3/ID NAMEUbuntu Desktop/NAME TYPEOS/TYPE DESCRIPTIONUbuntu 10.04 desktop for students./DESCRIPTION PUBLICNO/PUBLIC PERSISTENTNO/PERSISTENT SIZE41943040/SIZE /STORAGE On the Compute example there is an id attribute which I don't believe should be there: DISK id='0' STORAGE href='http://0.0.0.0:4567/storage/3' name='Ubuntu Desktop'/ TYPEDISK/TYPE TARGEThda/TARGET /DISK On the Using the Cloud page, each Storage Entity is name attribute. However, on the OCCI API page for the OpenNebula 3.0 documentation, each Storage Entity is only given a href attribute. Which documentation is correct? On the OpenNebula OCCI User Guide 3.0 I see the following example in which the STATE value is in all caps: $ occi-compute --url http://localhost:4567 --username oneadmin --password opennebula create vm.xml COMPUTE href='http://0.0.0.0:4567/compute/0' ID0/ID CPU1/CPU MEMORY1024/MEMORY NAMEMyCompute/NAME INSTANCE_TYPEsmall/INSTANCE_TYPE STATEPENDING/STATE DISK id='0' STORAGE href='http://0.0.0.0:4567/storage/3' name='Ubuntu Desktop'/ TYPEDISK/TYPE TARGEThda/TARGET /DISK NIC NETWORK href='http://0.0.0.0:4567/network/0' name='MyServiceNetwork'/ IP192.168.1.12/IP MAC02:00:c0:a8:01:0c/MAC /NIC CONTEXT DATADATA1/DATA HOSTNAMEMAINHOST/HOSTNAME TARGEThdb/TARGET /CONTEXT /COMPUTE However, on the OpenNebula OCCI Specification 3.0 page, the values for the state of a Compute Resource are show in lower caps. Which is it? -- Hutson Betts Computer Science and Engineering Texas AM University signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
