[one-users] opennebula 4.4 esxi 5.1 windows vms lose nic dirver

[hansz]

hi man,
yesterday i install opennebula4.4 on centos,but the windows2008r2 vms also has  
NIC driver problem
if i add  model =e1000 ,the vms will black screen ，when the vms startup, the 
follow are the network and the template
the network
[oneadmin@nebula ~]$ onevnet show 0 -x

  0
  0
  0
  oneadmin
  oneadmin
  EsxiNetwork
  
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
  
  -1
  
  0
  VM Network
  0
  
  
  
  
  
10.24.101.95
10.24.101.103
  
  2
  



  
  

  02:00:0a:18:65:5f
  10.24.101.95
  fe80::400:aff:fe18:655f
  1
  2


  02:00:0a:18:65:60
  10.24.101.96
  fe80::400:aff:fe18:6560
  1
  3

  

[oneadmin@nebula ~]$ 


the template
[oneadmin@nebula ~]$ onetemplate show 2 -x

  2
  0
  0
  oneadmin
  oneadmin
  windows2
  
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
  
  1386342845
  

  
  



  
  


  


  
  


  
  


  
  


  
  



  
  
  


  


  

[oneadmin@nebula ~]$ 



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] feature request

[Vladislav Gorbunov]

I patch opennebula-4.4.0/src/vmm/LibVirtDriverKVM.cc for support
MACHINE parameter (in attachment). You can download binary rpm for
CentOS 6.4 (need only oned) with this patch from the
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2296931/rpm/opennebula-server-4.4.0-1.x86_64.rpm
But look like libvirt not support q35 pc type.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-February/msg00431.html

"libvirt's address assignment code is basically
already broken for anything which isn't a x86 system with PIIX
controller. eg address assignment for QEMU ARM / PPC / etc is
mostly fubar. Regardless of what Q35 involves, libvirt needs to
sort out the existing mess it has in this area. Sorting this
should then make support for Q35 more or less trivial, since all
the hardwork will have been done."

2013/6/27 Carlos Martín Sánchez :
> Hi,
>
> I opened a ticket with your request:
> http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2143
>
> Is it supported by libvirt?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 in Berlin, 24-26 September, 2013
> --
> Carlos Martín, MSc
> Project Engineer
> OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization
> www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Shankhadeep Shome 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Please consider adding machine type to the OS section of the machine
>> definition file for kvm
>>
>> Shank
>>
>> For example, in my template definition I have
>>
>> OS=[BOOT="hd",ARCH="x86_64"]
>>
>> But I should be able to use, currently machine is ignored.
>>
>> OS=[BOOT="hd",MACHINE="q35",ARCH="x86_64"]
>>
>> Qemu is currently adding a new machine type to the list, the ICH9 chipset,
>> the ubuntu 13.04 qemu comes with
>>
>> none empty machine
>> pc   Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (alias of
>> pc-i440fx-1.4)
>> pc-i440fx-1.4Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (default)
>> pc-1.3   Standard PC
>> pc-1.2   Standard PC
>> pc-1.1   Standard PC
>> pc-1.0   Standard PC
>> pc-0.15  Standard PC
>> pc-0.14  Standard PC
>> pc-0.13  Standard PC
>> pc-0.12  Standard PC
>> pc-0.11  Standard PC, qemu 0.11
>> pc-0.10  Standard PC, qemu 0.10
>> isapcISA-only PC
>> xenfvXen Fully-virtualized PC
>> q35  Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (alias of pc-q35-1.4)
>> pc-q35-1.4   Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
>> xenpvXen Para-virtualized PC
>>
>> But notice the default is still the i440fx chipset. The new q35 emulated
>> machine provides better support for pci-express pass-through.
>>
>> Shank
>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Gareth Bult]

Mm, this 'can' be unsafe .. for example if you don't upgrade your OS, and a 
newer version of the product 
is incompatible with your version of the OS, you could too easily upgrade the 
product to a version that 
won't work ... technically there 'should' be a repo per OS release, for good 
reason .. 

-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 



- Original Message -

From: "Mario Giammarco"  
To: "Daniel Dehennin"  
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, 5 December, 2013 8:32:06 PM 
Subject: Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4 

Usually in debian I use the repository stable that is automatically updated to 
new "stable" version when it goes out (also testing and unstable are 
automatically updated). I never use versions names (wheezy etc.) 
So it is easier, when a new version is out I simply "apt-get update; apt-get 
dist-upgrade". No need to change repositories. 


2013/12/5 Daniel Dehennin < daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org > 



Gareth Bult < gar...@linux.co.uk > writes: 

> Erm, if you read the documentation (!) here; 
> http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:ignc 
> entitled "Installing the Software 4.4" ( ;-) ) the link it quotes is the 
> "downloads" variant ... 
> 
> I would guess (?) the address you have is an "old" one and they have 
> standardised on "downloads.opennebula" (??) 

The same here ;-) 

As an upgrade requires manual intervention, I propose to use named 
repositories per distribution: 

deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian/7 retina main 

Using a symlink to point to stable release if required and another one 
to point to numbered version. 

I'm not sure about it but we could use the distribution name as 
component, like: 

deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian retina wheezy 
deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian retina jessie 

It's quite easy to configure reprepro[1] and it's incoming to dispatch 
packages. 

Regards. 

Footnotes: 
[1] http://mirrorer.alioth.debian.org 

-- 
Daniel Dehennin 
Récupérer ma clef GPG: 
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x7A6FE2DF 

___ 
Users mailing list 
Users@lists.opennebula.org 
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org 






___ 
Users mailing list 
Users@lists.opennebula.org 
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org 

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Mario Giammarco]

Usually in debian I use the repository stable that is automatically updated
to new "stable" version when it goes out (also testing and unstable are
automatically updated). I never use versions names (wheezy etc.)
So it is easier, when a new version is out I simply "apt-get update;
apt-get dist-upgrade". No need to change repositories.


2013/12/5 Daniel Dehennin 

> Gareth Bult  writes:
>
> > Erm, if you read the documentation (!) here;
> > http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:ignc
> > entitled "Installing the Software 4.4" ( ;-) ) the link it quotes is the
> "downloads" variant ...
> >
> > I would guess (?) the address you have is an "old" one and they have
> > standardised on "downloads.opennebula" (??)
>
> The same here ;-)
>
> As an upgrade requires manual intervention, I propose to use named
> repositories per distribution:
>
> deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian/7 retina main
>
> Using a symlink to point to stable release if required and another one
> to point to numbered version.
>
> I'm not sure about it but we could use the distribution name as
> component, like:
>
> deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian retina wheezy
> deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian retina jessie
>
> It's quite easy to configure reprepro[1] and it's incoming to dispatch
> packages.
>
> Regards.
>
> Footnotes:
> [1]  http://mirrorer.alioth.debian.org
>
> --
> Daniel Dehennin
> Récupérer ma clef GPG:
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x7A6FE2DF
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Daniel Dehennin]

Gareth Bult  writes:

> Erm, if you read the documentation (!) here; 
> http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:ignc 
> entitled "Installing the Software 4.4" ( ;-) ) the link it quotes is the 
> "downloads" variant ... 
>
> I would guess (?) the address you have is an "old" one and they have
> standardised on "downloads.opennebula" (??) 

The same here ;-)

As an upgrade requires manual intervention, I propose to use named
repositories per distribution:

deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian/7 retina main

Using a symlink to point to stable release if required and another one
to point to numbered version.

I'm not sure about it but we could use the distribution name as
component, like:

deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian retina wheezy
deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/debian retina jessie

It's quite easy to configure reprepro[1] and it's incoming to dispatch
packages.

Regards.

Footnotes: 
[1]  http://mirrorer.alioth.debian.org

-- 
Daniel Dehennin
Récupérer ma clef GPG:
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x7A6FE2DF


pgpSLiUJbFnJ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Mario Giammarco]

You are right!


2013/12/5 Gareth Bult 

> Erm, if you read the documentation (!) here;
> http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:ignc
> entitled "Installing the Software 4.4" ( ;-) ) the link it quotes is the
> "downloads" variant ...
>
> I would guess (?) the address you have is an "old" one and they have
> standardised on "downloads.opennebula" (??)
>
> --
> *Gareth Bult*
> “The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.”
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Mario Giammarco" 
> *To: *"Gareth Bult" 
> *Cc: *users@lists.opennebula.org
> *Sent: *Thursday, 5 December, 2013 7:23:51 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4
>
> Incredible!
> At http://opennebula.org/ there is an ubuntu repo with old packages
> at http://DOWNLOADS.opennebula.org/ there is right repository with
> updated packages
>
>
> 2013/12/5 Gareth Bult 
>
>>
>> http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages
>>
>> echo "deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04 stable
>> opennebula" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opennebula.list
>> apt-get update
>>
>> --
>> *Gareth Bult*
>> “The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.”
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From: *"Mario Giammarco" 
>> *To: *"Gareth Bult" 
>> *Cc: *users@lists.opennebula.org
>> *Sent: *Thursday, 5 December, 2013 7:10:43 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4
>>
>>
>> I have checked again, here I can see only 4.2 packages:
>>
>>
>> http://opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages
>>
>>
>> 2013/12/5 Mario Giammarco 
>>
>>> I am shocked I continue to see 4.2. Tomorrow I try to add the repository
>>> to another server.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mario
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/12/5 Gareth Bult 
>>>
 Hi Mario,

 I've just upgraded from 4.3 (raw packages) to 4.4 (from the repo's) ...
 seemed to work Ok ..
 (I'm on Ubuntu Server 13.10, as far as I can see the 13.04 version
 works just fine with 13.10 ..)

 --
 *Gareth Bult*
 “The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.”



 --
 *From: *"Mario Giammarco" 
 *To: *users@lists.opennebula.org
 *Sent: *Thursday, 5 December, 2013 5:26:23 PM
 *Subject: *[one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4


 Hello,
 I am trying to install 4.4 but as far I can see official ubuntu
 repositories are stuck at 4.2.
 And also there is no ubuntu 13.10 version but I can use 13.04 or 12.04
 without problems.

 Where can I find updated repo?

 Thanks,
 Mario

 ___
 Users mailing list
 Users@lists.opennebula.org
 http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org


>>>
>>
>>
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Gareth Bult]

Erm, if you read the documentation (!) here; 
http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:ignc 
entitled "Installing the Software 4.4" ( ;-) ) the link it quotes is the 
"downloads" variant ... 

I would guess (?) the address you have is an "old" one and they have 
standardised on "downloads.opennebula" (??) 

-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 



- Original Message -

From: "Mario Giammarco"  
To: "Gareth Bult"  
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, 5 December, 2013 7:23:51 PM 
Subject: Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4 

Incredible! 
At http://opennebula.org/ there is an ubuntu repo with old packages 
at http://DOWNLOADS.opennebula.org/ there is right repository with updated 
packages 


2013/12/5 Gareth Bult < gar...@linux.co.uk > 



http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages
 

echo "deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04 stable opennebula" 
> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opennebula.list 
apt-get update 

-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 




From: "Mario Giammarco" < mgiamma...@gmail.com > 
To: "Gareth Bult" < gar...@linux.co.uk > 
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, 5 December, 2013 7:10:43 PM 
Subject: Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4 


I have checked again, here I can see only 4.2 packages: 

http://opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages
 


2013/12/5 Mario Giammarco < mgiamma...@gmail.com > 



I am shocked I continue to see 4.2. Tomorrow I try to add the repository to 
another server. 

Thanks, 
Mario 


2013/12/5 Gareth Bult < gar...@linux.co.uk > 



Hi Mario, 

I've just upgraded from 4.3 (raw packages) to 4.4 (from the repo's) ... seemed 
to work Ok .. 
(I'm on Ubuntu Server 13.10, as far as I can see the 13.04 version works just 
fine with 13.10 ..) 

-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 




From: "Mario Giammarco" < mgiamma...@gmail.com > 
To: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, 5 December, 2013 5:26:23 PM 
Subject: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4 


Hello, 
I am trying to install 4.4 but as far I can see official ubuntu repositories 
are stuck at 4.2. 
And also there is no ubuntu 13.10 version but I can use 13.04 or 12.04 without 
problems. 

Where can I find updated repo? 

Thanks, 
Mario 

___ 
Users mailing list 
Users@lists.opennebula.org 
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org 















___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Mario Giammarco]

Incredible!
At http://opennebula.org/ there is an ubuntu repo with old packages
at http://DOWNLOADS.opennebula.org/ there is right repository with updated
packages


2013/12/5 Gareth Bult 

>
> http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages
>
> echo "deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04 stable
> opennebula" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opennebula.list
> apt-get update
>
> --
> *Gareth Bult*
> “The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.”
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Mario Giammarco" 
> *To: *"Gareth Bult" 
> *Cc: *users@lists.opennebula.org
> *Sent: *Thursday, 5 December, 2013 7:10:43 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4
>
>
> I have checked again, here I can see only 4.2 packages:
>
>
> http://opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages
>
>
> 2013/12/5 Mario Giammarco 
>
>> I am shocked I continue to see 4.2. Tomorrow I try to add the repository
>> to another server.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mario
>>
>>
>> 2013/12/5 Gareth Bult 
>>
>>> Hi Mario,
>>>
>>> I've just upgraded from 4.3 (raw packages) to 4.4 (from the repo's) ...
>>> seemed to work Ok ..
>>> (I'm on Ubuntu Server 13.10, as far as I can see the 13.04 version works
>>> just fine with 13.10 ..)
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Gareth Bult*
>>> “The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.”
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Mario Giammarco" 
>>> *To: *users@lists.opennebula.org
>>> *Sent: *Thursday, 5 December, 2013 5:26:23 PM
>>> *Subject: *[one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I am trying to install 4.4 but as far I can see official ubuntu
>>> repositories are stuck at 4.2.
>>> And also there is no ubuntu 13.10 version but I can use 13.04 or 12.04
>>> without problems.
>>>
>>> Where can I find updated repo?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mario
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users@lists.opennebula.org
>>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Gareth Bult]

http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages
 

echo "deb http://downloads.opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04 stable opennebula" 
> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opennebula.list 
apt-get update 

-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 



- Original Message -

From: "Mario Giammarco"  
To: "Gareth Bult"  
Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, 5 December, 2013 7:10:43 PM 
Subject: Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4 

I have checked again, here I can see only 4.2 packages: 

http://opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages
 


2013/12/5 Mario Giammarco < mgiamma...@gmail.com > 



I am shocked I continue to see 4.2. Tomorrow I try to add the repository to 
another server. 

Thanks, 
Mario 


2013/12/5 Gareth Bult < gar...@linux.co.uk > 



Hi Mario, 

I've just upgraded from 4.3 (raw packages) to 4.4 (from the repo's) ... seemed 
to work Ok .. 
(I'm on Ubuntu Server 13.10, as far as I can see the 13.04 version works just 
fine with 13.10 ..) 

-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 




From: "Mario Giammarco" < mgiamma...@gmail.com > 
To: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, 5 December, 2013 5:26:23 PM 
Subject: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4 


Hello, 
I am trying to install 4.4 but as far I can see official ubuntu repositories 
are stuck at 4.2. 
And also there is no ubuntu 13.10 version but I can use 13.04 or 12.04 without 
problems. 

Where can I find updated repo? 

Thanks, 
Mario 

___ 
Users mailing list 
Users@lists.opennebula.org 
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org 










___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Mario Giammarco]

I have checked again, here I can see only 4.2 packages:

http://opennebula.org/repo/Ubuntu/13.04/dists/stable/opennebula/binary-amd64/Packages


2013/12/5 Mario Giammarco 

> I am shocked I continue to see 4.2. Tomorrow I try to add the repository
> to another server.
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
>
> 2013/12/5 Gareth Bult 
>
>> Hi Mario,
>>
>> I've just upgraded from 4.3 (raw packages) to 4.4 (from the repo's) ...
>> seemed to work Ok ..
>> (I'm on Ubuntu Server 13.10, as far as I can see the 13.04 version works
>> just fine with 13.10 ..)
>>
>> --
>> *Gareth Bult*
>> “The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.”
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From: *"Mario Giammarco" 
>> *To: *users@lists.opennebula.org
>> *Sent: *Thursday, 5 December, 2013 5:26:23 PM
>> *Subject: *[one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>> I am trying to install 4.4 but as far I can see official ubuntu
>> repositories are stuck at 4.2.
>> And also there is no ubuntu 13.10 version but I can use 13.04 or 12.04
>> without problems.
>>
>> Where can I find updated repo?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mario
>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Mario Giammarco]

I am shocked I continue to see 4.2. Tomorrow I try to add the repository to
another server.

Thanks,
Mario


2013/12/5 Gareth Bult 

> Hi Mario,
>
> I've just upgraded from 4.3 (raw packages) to 4.4 (from the repo's) ...
> seemed to work Ok ..
> (I'm on Ubuntu Server 13.10, as far as I can see the 13.04 version works
> just fine with 13.10 ..)
>
> --
> *Gareth Bult*
> “The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.”
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Mario Giammarco" 
> *To: *users@lists.opennebula.org
> *Sent: *Thursday, 5 December, 2013 5:26:23 PM
> *Subject: *[one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4
>
>
> Hello,
> I am trying to install 4.4 but as far I can see official ubuntu
> repositories are stuck at 4.2.
> And also there is no ubuntu 13.10 version but I can use 13.04 or 12.04
> without problems.
>
> Where can I find updated repo?
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Sunstone problem after upgrading form 4.2 to 4.4

[Giovanni Ponti]

It still doesn't work!
I also tried with other browser, but the problem remains!



Il 05/12/2013 19:37, Campbell, Bill ha scritto:

I had the same problem, you may need to delete the contents of your
browser cache and try again (some cached objects were causing those
problems for me)


*From: *"Giovanni Ponti" 
*To: *users@lists.opennebula.org
*Sent: *Thursday, December 5, 2013 1:01:24 PM
*Subject: *[one-users] Sunstone problem after upgrading form 4.2 to 4.4

I have a problem with the Sunstone interface after upgrading from 4.2 to
4.4.
I followed the procedure and everything went right. One daemons are
running and VMs are in the correct state and they are reachable via
remote connection. The sunstone server started correctly but, after
logging in, it does not show any resource, user, datastores, images,
network, etc..
I've also checked the sunston-server.conf and all the settings seem to
be right, included the ":table_order: desc" parameter.

Thanks in advance for your reply(s)!

Giovanni
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org


*NOTICE: Protect the information in this message in accordance with the
company's security policies. If you received this message in error,
immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies.*


--
Ing. Giovanni Ponti, PhD
UTICT-HPC
ENEA - C.R. Portici
P.le E. Fermi, 1 (Loc. Granatello)
80055 Portici (NA), Italy
phone : (+39) 081-7723564 | int.: [89] 2564
fax   : (+39) 081-7723344
email : giovanni.po...@enea.it
web   : http://www.afs.enea.it/gponti
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Sunstone problem after upgrading form 4.2 to 4.4

[Campbell, Bill]

I had the same problem, you may need to delete the contents of your browser 
cache and try again (some cached objects were causing those problems for me) 

- Original Message -

From: "Giovanni Ponti"  
To: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 1:01:24 PM 
Subject: [one-users] Sunstone problem after upgrading form 4.2 to 4.4 

I have a problem with the Sunstone interface after upgrading from 4.2 to 
4.4. 
I followed the procedure and everything went right. One daemons are 
running and VMs are in the correct state and they are reachable via 
remote connection. The sunstone server started correctly but, after 
logging in, it does not show any resource, user, datastores, images, 
network, etc.. 
I've also checked the sunston-server.conf and all the settings seem to 
be right, included the ":table_order: desc" parameter. 

Thanks in advance for your reply(s)! 

Giovanni 
___ 
Users mailing list 
Users@lists.opennebula.org 
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org 


NOTICE: Protect the information in this message in accordance with the 
company's security policies. If you received this message in error, immediately 
notify the sender and destroy all copies.___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Gareth Bult]

Hi Mario, 

I've just upgraded from 4.3 (raw packages) to 4.4 (from the repo's) ... seemed 
to work Ok .. 
(I'm on Ubuntu Server 13.10, as far as I can see the 13.04 version works just 
fine with 13.10 ..) 

-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 



- Original Message -

From: "Mario Giammarco"  
To: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, 5 December, 2013 5:26:23 PM 
Subject: [one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4 

Hello, 
I am trying to install 4.4 but as far I can see official ubuntu repositories 
are stuck at 4.2. 
And also there is no ubuntu 13.10 version but I can use 13.04 or 12.04 without 
problems. 

Where can I find updated repo? 

Thanks, 
Mario 

___ 
Users mailing list 
Users@lists.opennebula.org 
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org 

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

[one-users] Sunstone problem after upgrading form 4.2 to 4.4

[Giovanni Ponti]

I have a problem with the Sunstone interface after upgrading from 4.2 to 
4.4.
I followed the procedure and everything went right. One daemons are 
running and VMs are in the correct state and they are reachable via 
remote connection. The sunstone server started correctly but, after 
logging in, it does not show any resource, user, datastores, images, 
network, etc..
I've also checked the sunston-server.conf and all the settings seem to 
be right, included the ":table_order: desc" parameter.


Thanks in advance for your reply(s)!

Giovanni
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

[one-users] Ubuntu/debian repositories for 4.4

[Mario Giammarco]

Hello,
I am trying to install 4.4 but as far I can see official ubuntu
repositories are stuck at 4.2.
And also there is no ubuntu 13.10 version but I can use 13.04 or 12.04
without problems.

Where can I find updated repo?

Thanks,
Mario
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Nebula delivering a read only SO

[Tino Vazquez]

Hi,

Ok, let's see the deployment file
(/var/lib/one/datastores///deployment.0). Also,
it would help to know the exact error message you are getting.

Best,

-T

--
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple

--
Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova

--
Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
cooperation.


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
> Hello Tino,
>
> In the Nebula side, the VM is in the RUNNING state, with no errors in the log.
>
> But in the VMWare side, the VM could not boot properly.
>
> The message is related to a non writable disk, and when I manually
> permit that the VM write in the disk, when the OS start, the
> filesystem is in read only mode.
>
> Is it clear or do I need to provide more information.
>
> Maybe can be something with the template configuration?
>
> Regards,
> Eduardo Roloff
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Tino Vazquez  wrote:
>> Hi Eduardo,
>>
>> Could you elaborate more on this:
>>
>>> But in the VMware side, they are delivered in read only mode and I
>>> can`t use them.
>>
>> Not sure what you mean with read only, is it the disk?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Tino
>>
>> --
>> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
>>
>> --
>> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
>> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
>> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova
>>
>> --
>> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
>> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
>> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
>> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
>> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
>> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
>> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
>> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
>> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
>> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
>> cooperation.
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Breakage when upgrading from 4.38 to 4.4 ... [Resolved]

[Gareth Bult]

Ok, not sure what the difference is, but this is a fix; 

kvm-probes.d/monitor_ds.sh 


--- monitor_ds.sh.orig 2013-12-05 17:06:35.251763742 + 
+++ monitor_ds.sh 2013-12-05 16:55:11.699743037 + 
@@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ 
TOTAL_MB=$(df -B1M -P $dir 2>/dev/null | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $2}') 
FREE_MB=$(df -B1M -P $dir 2>/dev/null | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $4}') 

+ USED_MB=${USED_MB:-"0"} 
+ TOTAL_MB=${TOTAL_MB:-"0"} 
+ FREE_MB=${FREE_MB:-"0"} 
+ 
if [ -n "$LVM_SIZE_CMD" ]; then 
LVM_SIZE=$($LVM_SIZE_CMD ${LVM_VG_PREFIX}${ds} 2>/dev/null) 
LVM_STATUS=$? 
The host monitor seems to be calling a generic monitor which is also grabbing 
information about datastores. 
In an environment (such as VDC) where the data exists remotely, the standard 
monitor (which uses 'du') isn't 
going to provide any useful results, indeed in this instance it errors and the 
script returns blanks, which breaks 
the host monitoring. Returning '0' on failure fixes the issue ... 

Any chance this could inserted in the next release please? 


-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 



- Original Message -

From: "Gareth Bult"  
To: users@lists.opennebula.org 
Sent: Thursday, 5 December, 2013 3:47:12 PM 
Subject: [one-users] Breakage when upgrading from 4.38 to 4.4 ... 

Hi, I've run the upgrade just to see if a number of issues I was having were 
fixed, and I seem to have 
ended up with a fairly terminal issue I can't spot. 

Host monitoring is now failing for hosts that previously seemed to be working. 
The reason seems to be 
that the host is somehow looking at the datastores, and this in turn is 
failing. 

The datastore monitoring is correct. 
The error in oned.log is as follows; 


Thu Dec 5 15:24:47 2013 [ONE][E]: Error parsing host information: syntax error, 
unexpected EQUAL, expecting COMMA or CBRACKET at line 30, columns 494:497. 
Monitoring information: 
ARCH=x86_64 
MODELNAME="AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1100T Processor" 
HYPERVISOR=kvm 
TOTALCPU=600 
CPUSPEED=3300 
TOTALMEMORY=16175216 
USEDMEMORY=399320 
FREEMEMORY=15775896 
FREECPU=600.0 
USEDCPU=0.0 
NETRX=33791417902 
NETTX=25290741468 
DS_LOCATION_USED_MB=2637 
DS_LOCATION_TOTAL_MB=40190 
DS_LOCATION_FREE_MB=28202 
DS = [ 
ID = 0, 
USED_MB = 29, 
TOTAL_MB = 40190, 
FREE_MB = 28202 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 1, 
USED_MB = 2609, 
TOTAL_MB = 40190, 
FREE_MB = 28202 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 107, 
USED_MB = , 
TOTAL_MB = , 
FREE_MB = 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 109, 
USED_MB = , 
TOTAL_MB = , 
FREE_MB = 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 114, 
USED_MB = 1, 
TOTAL_MB = 40190, 
FREE_MB = 28202 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 2, 
USED_MB = 1, 
TOTAL_MB = 40190, 
FREE_MB = 28202 
] 
HOSTNAME=node1 
VM_POLL=YES 
VERSION="4.4.0" 
So it would appear that it's calling datastore/monitor, and it's failing .. 
however the script does work and is reporting 
the correct size in the datastore monitor. I've added syslog to the monitor 
script, it is being called and it is returning 
the correct result ... 

If I call the script on the command line with a pasted in base64 and host it, 
this too gives the correct results; 

oneadmin@nebula:~/remotes$ ssh node1 /var/lib/one/remotes/datastore/vdc/monitor 
"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"
 109 


TOTAL_MB=1500101.21 
FREE_MB=963230.30 
USED_MB=536871 
Short of trying to dig through oned's source code I'm stuck - can anyone help? 

My datastore driver type is "vdc", even if I insert a static script (I've also 
tried the monitor driver from "fs") 
that just prints out "TOTAL_MB=0" etc .. I still get the same issue ... 

??? 
(and it was working fine .. before the upgrade??) 


-

Re: [one-users] VMWare image on ONE 4.4

[Eduardo Roloff]

Tino,

There is no "Error renaming file" in the log

The only mention about my image import process was below

Thu Dec  5 13:50:48 2013 [ImM][I]: Copying
/var/tmp/thin-body20131205-2910-1o35uep-0 to repository for image 19
Thu Dec  5 13:50:53 2013 [ImM][I]: Image (19) copied and ready to use.

Eduardo

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Tino Vazquez  wrote:
> Strange indeed. I've just tried on a 4.4 and imports as disk.vmdk from 
> ttylinux.
>
> This is the renaming code:
>
> ---
> if [ -d "$SRC" -a ! -f "$SRC/disk.vmdk" ]; then
> BASE_DISK_FILE=`ls $SRC | grep '\.vmdk$' | grep -v
> '\-\(flat\|delta\|s[0-9]*\)\.vmdk$'`
>
> exec_and_log "mv -f $SRC/$BASE_DISK_FILE $SRC/disk.vmdk" \
>  "Error renaming file $SRC/$BASE_DISK_FILE to $SRC/disk.vmdk"
> fi
> ---
>
> Can you check for "Error renaming file" in the oned.log?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -T
> --
> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
>
> --
> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova
>
> --
> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
> cooperation.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
>> Just to isolate any problems with the images generated by me I
>> download the TTY-VMWARE from the Nebula Marketplace and import it.
>>
>> It was imported with the name "ttylinux.vmdk".
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
>>> Tino,
>>>
>>> I created two images now, (1) disk,vmk and (2) RHEL.vmdk.
>>>
>>> I compressed both with tar.gz and imported to OpenNebula using Sunstone.
>>>
>>> The (1) is imported with disk,vmdk name and the (2) was imported with
>>> the RHEL.vmdk name.
>>>
>>> Both are functional, but when I transfer to the VMWare host they are
>>> transfered with the orginal name and the (2) cannot boot.
>>>
>>> I checked the logs and the import processes for both occurs without
>>> any error message.
>>>
>>> Eduardo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Tino Vazquez  wrote:
 Hi Eduardo,

 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
> When I import the image, it supposed to be renamed to disk.vmdk?

 Exactly, the import process should rename it automatically, and fail
 otherwise. Not sure why this is not the case, if you reimport the
 image again, does it get renamed? Yo will need to read the SOURCE
 attribute of the newly imported image, and check that it contains a
 disk.vmdk.

 Regards,

 -Tino



 --
 OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple

 --
 Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
 Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
 www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova

 --
 Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
 any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
 confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
 and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
 "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
 Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
 communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
 unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
 immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
 attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
 cooperation.
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] VMWare image on ONE 4.4

[Tino Vazquez]

Strange indeed. I've just tried on a 4.4 and imports as disk.vmdk from ttylinux.

This is the renaming code:

---
if [ -d "$SRC" -a ! -f "$SRC/disk.vmdk" ]; then
BASE_DISK_FILE=`ls $SRC | grep '\.vmdk$' | grep -v
'\-\(flat\|delta\|s[0-9]*\)\.vmdk$'`

exec_and_log "mv -f $SRC/$BASE_DISK_FILE $SRC/disk.vmdk" \
 "Error renaming file $SRC/$BASE_DISK_FILE to $SRC/disk.vmdk"
fi
---

Can you check for "Error renaming file" in the oned.log?

Cheers,

-T
--
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple

--
Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova

--
Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
cooperation.


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
> Just to isolate any problems with the images generated by me I
> download the TTY-VMWARE from the Nebula Marketplace and import it.
>
> It was imported with the name "ttylinux.vmdk".
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
>> Tino,
>>
>> I created two images now, (1) disk,vmk and (2) RHEL.vmdk.
>>
>> I compressed both with tar.gz and imported to OpenNebula using Sunstone.
>>
>> The (1) is imported with disk,vmdk name and the (2) was imported with
>> the RHEL.vmdk name.
>>
>> Both are functional, but when I transfer to the VMWare host they are
>> transfered with the orginal name and the (2) cannot boot.
>>
>> I checked the logs and the import processes for both occurs without
>> any error message.
>>
>> Eduardo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Tino Vazquez  wrote:
>>> Hi Eduardo,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
 When I import the image, it supposed to be renamed to disk.vmdk?
>>>
>>> Exactly, the import process should rename it automatically, and fail
>>> otherwise. Not sure why this is not the case, if you reimport the
>>> image again, does it get renamed? Yo will need to read the SOURCE
>>> attribute of the newly imported image, and check that it contains a
>>> disk.vmdk.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> -Tino
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
>>>
>>> --
>>> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
>>> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
>>> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova
>>>
>>> --
>>> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
>>> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
>>> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
>>> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
>>> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
>>> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
>>> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
>>> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
>>> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
>>> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
>>> cooperation.
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

[one-users] Breakage when upgrading from 4.38 to 4.4 ...

[Gareth Bult]

Hi, I've run the upgrade just to see if a number of issues I was having were 
fixed, and I seem to have 
ended up with a fairly terminal issue I can't spot. 

Host monitoring is now failing for hosts that previously seemed to be working. 
The reason seems to be 
that the host is somehow looking at the datastores, and this in turn is 
failing. 

The datastore monitoring is correct. 
The error in oned.log is as follows; 


Thu Dec 5 15:24:47 2013 [ONE][E]: Error parsing host information: syntax error, 
unexpected EQUAL, expecting COMMA or CBRACKET at line 30, columns 494:497. 
Monitoring information: 
ARCH=x86_64 
MODELNAME="AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1100T Processor" 
HYPERVISOR=kvm 
TOTALCPU=600 
CPUSPEED=3300 
TOTALMEMORY=16175216 
USEDMEMORY=399320 
FREEMEMORY=15775896 
FREECPU=600.0 
USEDCPU=0.0 
NETRX=33791417902 
NETTX=25290741468 
DS_LOCATION_USED_MB=2637 
DS_LOCATION_TOTAL_MB=40190 
DS_LOCATION_FREE_MB=28202 
DS = [ 
ID = 0, 
USED_MB = 29, 
TOTAL_MB = 40190, 
FREE_MB = 28202 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 1, 
USED_MB = 2609, 
TOTAL_MB = 40190, 
FREE_MB = 28202 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 107, 
USED_MB = , 
TOTAL_MB = , 
FREE_MB = 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 109, 
USED_MB = , 
TOTAL_MB = , 
FREE_MB = 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 114, 
USED_MB = 1, 
TOTAL_MB = 40190, 
FREE_MB = 28202 
] 
DS = [ 
ID = 2, 
USED_MB = 1, 
TOTAL_MB = 40190, 
FREE_MB = 28202 
] 
HOSTNAME=node1 
VM_POLL=YES 
VERSION="4.4.0" 
So it would appear that it's calling datastore/monitor, and it's failing .. 
however the script does work and is reporting 
the correct size in the datastore monitor. I've added syslog to the monitor 
script, it is being called and it is returning 
the correct result ... 

If I call the script on the command line with a pasted in base64 and host it, 
this too gives the correct results; 

oneadmin@nebula:~/remotes$ ssh node1 /var/lib/one/remotes/datastore/vdc/monitor 
"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"
 109 


TOTAL_MB=1500101.21 
FREE_MB=963230.30 
USED_MB=536871 
Short of trying to dig through oned's source code I'm stuck - can anyone help? 

My datastore driver type is "vdc", even if I insert a static script (I've also 
tried the monitor driver from "fs") 
that just prints out "TOTAL_MB=0" etc .. I still get the same issue ... 

??? 
(and it was working fine .. before the upgrade??) 


-- 
Gareth Bult 
“The odds of hitting your target go up dramatically when you aim at it.” 



___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] VMWare image on ONE 4.4

[Eduardo Roloff]

Just to isolate any problems with the images generated by me I
download the TTY-VMWARE from the Nebula Marketplace and import it.

It was imported with the name "ttylinux.vmdk".

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
> Tino,
>
> I created two images now, (1) disk,vmk and (2) RHEL.vmdk.
>
> I compressed both with tar.gz and imported to OpenNebula using Sunstone.
>
> The (1) is imported with disk,vmdk name and the (2) was imported with
> the RHEL.vmdk name.
>
> Both are functional, but when I transfer to the VMWare host they are
> transfered with the orginal name and the (2) cannot boot.
>
> I checked the logs and the import processes for both occurs without
> any error message.
>
> Eduardo
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Tino Vazquez  wrote:
>> Hi Eduardo,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
>>> When I import the image, it supposed to be renamed to disk.vmdk?
>>
>> Exactly, the import process should rename it automatically, and fail
>> otherwise. Not sure why this is not the case, if you reimport the
>> image again, does it get renamed? Yo will need to read the SOURCE
>> attribute of the newly imported image, and check that it contains a
>> disk.vmdk.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Tino
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
>>
>> --
>> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
>> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
>> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova
>>
>> --
>> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
>> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
>> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
>> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
>> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
>> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
>> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
>> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
>> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
>> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
>> cooperation.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] VMWare image on ONE 4.4

[Eduardo Roloff]

Tino,

I created two images now, (1) disk,vmk and (2) RHEL.vmdk.

I compressed both with tar.gz and imported to OpenNebula using Sunstone.

The (1) is imported with disk,vmdk name and the (2) was imported with
the RHEL.vmdk name.

Both are functional, but when I transfer to the VMWare host they are
transfered with the orginal name and the (2) cannot boot.

I checked the logs and the import processes for both occurs without
any error message.

Eduardo





On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Tino Vazquez  wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
>> When I import the image, it supposed to be renamed to disk.vmdk?
>
> Exactly, the import process should rename it automatically, and fail
> otherwise. Not sure why this is not the case, if you reimport the
> image again, does it get renamed? Yo will need to read the SOURCE
> attribute of the newly imported image, and check that it contains a
> disk.vmdk.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Tino
>
>
>
> --
> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
>
> --
> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova
>
> --
> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
> cooperation.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] NFS datastore file system

[Dmitri Chebotarov]

Hi

The host running ONED needs to ssh to all VM hosts using public key 
(passwordless).
ONED will use ‘oneadmin’ account to access all VM hosts.
B/c /var/lib/one is shared (using NFS) between ONED and all hosts you need to 
setup public key auth only once for user ‘oneadmin’.

Setup your NFS server/filer, login to ONED controller, mount /var/lib/one, su – 
oneadmin;

cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys
Chmod 600  ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

Now, you can ssh to any host as user ‘oneadmin’ using public key.
Please note, that each host needs /var/lib/one mounted from the same location 
as other hosts and ONED server.

If you chose to only use NFS for your datastores (I.e. 
/var/lib/one/datastores/) then you need to add public key on ALL your hosts, 
not just one.
--
Thank you,

Dmitri Chebotarov
VCL Sys Eng, Engineering & Architectural Support, TSD - Ent Servers & Messaging
223 Aquia Building, Ffx, MSN: 1B5
Phone: (703) 993-6175 | Fax: (703) 993-3404


From: Neelaya Dhatchayani mailto:neels.v...@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2013 at 23:33
To: Jaime Melis mailto:jme...@c12g.com>>, opennebula 
mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org>>
Subject: Re: [one-users] NFS datastore file system

Hi Jaime,

Thanks. My doubt is if my frontend is installed in a host called 
onedaemon, should i ve to ssh passwordless from onedaemon to onedaemon 
sorry if my question is silly..

regards
neelaya


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Jaime Melis 
mailto:jme...@c12g.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Please reply to the mailing list as well.

Yes. It is a basic requirement that all the nodes (frontend + hypervisors) 
should have a oneadmin account, and they should be able to ssh passwordlessly 
from any node to any other node.

cheers,
Jaime



On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Neelaya Dhatchayani 
mailto:neels.v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Jaime,

Thanks a lot for your reply. I have one more doubt. Should I have to ssh 
passwordless to the frontend if I am using ssh transfer manager. I know that it 
has to be done for the hosts.

neelaya




On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Jaime Melis 
mailto:jme...@c12g.com>> wrote:
Hi Neelaya,

the frontend and the nodes must share /var/lib/one/datastores. Any node can 
export this share, preferably a NAS system, but if you don't have been, you can 
export it from the frontend.

cheers,
Jaime


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Neelaya Dhatchayani 
mailto:neels.v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi

Can anyone tell me what has to be done on the frontend and hosts inorder to use 
shared transfer driver and with respect to NFS.

Thanks in advance
neelaya

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org




--
Jaime Melis
C12G Labs - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
http://www.c12g.com | jme...@c12g.com

--

Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the 
e-mail and
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G's thanks you for your
cooperation.




--
Jaime Melis
C12G Labs - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
http://www.c12g.com | jme...@c12g.com

--

Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the 
e-mail and
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G's thanks you for your
cooperation.

___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Fwd: how running vms moved(not recreate) on another host on host error

[Dmitri Chebotarov]

Hi,

Did you ever figured out how to “move” VM in case when VM host goes down?
I ran into the same issue last night.
RHEL6 cluster, same OS/KVM version. One of them VM hosts went down (error) and 
VMs running on that host were recreated on available hosts.
Recreated VMs lost work progress.

RHEL6 cluster is using shared NFS storage for system and “data” datastores.
Once host died, ONE attempts to connect to the dead host to access system 
datastore, which is already mounted on ONE controller under the same path (log 
below).
This is how system datastore configured:

TYPE: SYSTEM_DS
DISK_TYPE: file
TM_MAD: shared.

It’s mounted on all cluster nodes and ONED controller under the same path 
(/var/lib/one).
I’m probably missing something in system datastore configuration, which would 
tell ONED to access it locally, not via dead VM host…

Shouldn’t ONED start VMs on available host using existing config/disk files in 
system datastore?
And not delete/recreated it?

Thank you.

Thu Dec 5 04:49:29 2013 [VMM][I]: Command execution fail: 
/var/tmp/one/vnm/ovswitch/clean
Thu Dec 5 04:49:29 2013 [VMM][I]: ssh: connect to host BC4-10 port 22: No route 
to host
Thu Dec 5 04:49:29 2013 [VMM][I]: ExitSSHCode: 255
Thu Dec 5 04:49:29 2013 [VMM][E]: Error connecting to BC4-10
Thu Dec 5 04:49:29 2013 [VMM][I]: Failed to execute network driver operation: 
clean.
Thu Dec 5 04:49:32 2013 [VMM][I]: Command execution fail: 
/var/lib/one/remotes/tm/qcow2/delete 
BC4-10:/var/lib/one//datastores/111/11251/disk.0 11251 107
Thu Dec 5 04:49:32 2013 [VMM][I]: delete: Deleting 
/var/lib/one/datastores/111/11251/disk.0
Thu Dec 5 04:49:32 2013 [VMM][E]: delete: Command "rm -rf 
/var/lib/one/datastores/111/11251/disk.0" failed: ssh: connect to host BC4-10 
port 22: No route to host
Thu Dec 5 04:49:32 2013 [VMM][E]: Error deleting 
/var/lib/one/datastores/111/11251/disk.0
Thu Dec 5 04:49:32 2013 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 255
Thu Dec 5 04:49:32 2013 [VMM][I]: Failed to execute transfer manager driver 
operation: tm_delete.
Thu Dec 5 04:49:35 2013 [VMM][I]: Command execution fail: 
/var/lib/one/remotes/tm/shared/delete BC4-10:/var/lib/one//datastores/111/11251 
11251 111
Thu Dec 5 04:49:35 2013 [VMM][I]: delete: Deleting 
/var/lib/one/datastores/111/11251
Thu Dec 5 04:49:35 2013 [VMM][E]: delete: Command "rm -rf 
/var/lib/one/datastores/111/11251" failed: ssh: connect to host BC4-10 port 22: 
No route to host
Thu Dec 5 04:49:35 2013 [VMM][E]: Error deleting 
/var/lib/one/datastores/111/11251
Thu Dec 5 04:49:35 2013 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 255
Thu Dec 5 04:49:35 2013 [VMM][I]: Failed to execute transfer manager driver 
operation: tm_delete.
Thu Dec 5 04:49:35 2013 [VMM][I]: Host successfully cleaned.
Thu Dec 5 04:49:35 2013 [DiM][I]: New VM state is PENDING
—
Thank you,

Dmitri Chebotarov
VCL Sys Eng, Engineering & Architectural Support, TSD - Ent Servers & Messaging
223 Aquia Building, Ffx, MSN: 1B5
Phone: (703) 993-6175 | Fax: (703) 993-3404


From: Carlos Martín Sánchez 
mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org>>
Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 at 5:44
To: Romany Nageh mailto:engromanyna...@gmail.com>>
Cc: "users@lists.opennebula.org" 
mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org>>
Subject: Re: [one-users] Fwd: how running vms moved(not recreate) on another 
host on host error

Hi,

What do you exactly mean by "move"? If you are referring to migration, that's 
not possible, once a host goes down, the VM state is lost.

Regards

--
Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 in Berlin, 24-26 
September, 2013
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization
www.OpenNebula.org | 
cmar...@opennebula.org | 
@OpenNebula


On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Romany Nageh 
mailto:engromanyna...@gmail.com>> wrote:

HI
i am using opennebula 4.2 how to handle vms running on specific host to move 
(not recreate) to another host when host error(down)

please could any on help me ?
Thanks

-- Forwarded message --
From: "Romany Nageh" mailto:engromanyna...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sep 9, 2013 9:46 PM
Subject: how running vms moved(not recreate) on another host on host error
To: mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org>>, "Carlos 
Martín Sánchez" mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org>>

HI
i am  using opennebula 4.2
how to handle vms running on specific host to move (not recreate) to another 
host when host error(down)

please could any on help me ?


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] VMWare image on ONE 4.4

[Tino Vazquez]

Hi Eduardo,

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
> When I import the image, it supposed to be renamed to disk.vmdk?

Exactly, the import process should rename it automatically, and fail
otherwise. Not sure why this is not the case, if you reimport the
image again, does it get renamed? Yo will need to read the SOURCE
attribute of the newly imported image, and check that it contains a
disk.vmdk.

Regards,

-Tino



--
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple

--
Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova

--
Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
cooperation.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] VMWare image on ONE 4.4

[Eduardo Roloff]

Tino,

The copy of the image occurs without problems.

The path " /volumes/vmfs//12/disk.0" exists and the disk file
is copied with the original filename like RHEL-x64.vmdk.

But when the BOOT will occurrs, the Nebula script is using "disk.vmdk"
instead of the "RHEL-x64.vmdk"

When I import the image, it supposed to be renamed to disk.vmdk?

Eduardo




On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Tino Vazquez  wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> All registered vmdks (regardless or whether they are compressed or
> not) are renamed to disk.vmdk, for internal handling.
>
> The problem you are experiencing is that the prolog is not copying the
> image properly, probably due to a misconfiguration.
>
> Could you check that the following path exists in the relevant ESX host?
>
>  /volumes/vmfs//12/disk.0
>
> Where ds_id is the system datastore identifier.
>
> If it doesn't, check oned.log and the vm log for hints on why the
> image hasn't been copied, or send them through for analysis.
>
> Best,
>
> -Tino
> --
> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
>
> --
> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova
>
> --
> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
> cooperation.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I configured a ONE 4.4 installation with CentOS in the front end and
>> ESXi on hosts.
>>
>> I uploaded an vmware image through sunstone (RHEL-x64.vmdk) using the
>> tar.gz format.
>>
>> But when I try to instantiate a VM using this image the front end
>> tranfer the image to the host, but when it tryes to start it it is
>> using a diferent vmdk (disk.vmdk), according with the error below.
>>
>> Wed Dec 4 11:50:26 2013 [VMM][I]: error: internal error Could not
>> start domain: FileNotFound - File [0] 12/disk.0/disk.vmdk was not
>> found
>>
>> It is mandatory to use "disk.vmdk" as the disk name for vmware? And in
>> case of a slipted disk?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eduardo
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] oZones Server Incomplete Information

[Campbell, Bill]

Sure, 
I just created a 'bcampbell' user and added it to the 'oneadmin' group. After 
that, I created resources, so ownership was 'bcampbell:oneadmin" 

As an aside, I connected the 4.4 oZones to our 3.8 instance of ONE, and 
received the same result. I could only see things owned by my user, not 
anything else. 

- Original Message -

From: "Tino Vazquez"  
To: "Bill Campbell"  
Cc: "users"  
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2013 5:59:41 AM 
Subject: Re: [one-users] oZones Server Incomplete Information 

Hi Bill, 

That shouldn't be the case. Can you send the permissions & ownership 
of the resource not visible by 'oneadmin'? 

I'll try to reproduce that locally. 

Regards, 

-Tino 

-- 
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple 

-- 
Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc 
Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs 
www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova 

-- 
Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and 
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is 
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person 
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the 
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. 
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this 
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us 
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and 
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your 
cooperation. 


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Campbell, Bill 
 wrote: 
> Tino, 
> I figured out why they are not displaying. 
> 
> I'm connecting the oZones server using the 'oneadmin' account. All of the 
> missing resources were created and owned by my account (not oneadmin). 
> After changing the owner to oneadmin, the resources appeared in oZones. 
> 
> 
> This poses a problem. Since we have multiple users and would like to use 
> oZones as a dashboard for a broad overview of the entire environment, is 
> there a way to ensure that all resources, no matter who they are owned by, 
> are visible? 
> 
>  
> From: "Bill Campbell"  
> To: "Tino Vazquez"  
> Cc: "users"  
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:42:08 PM 
> 
> Subject: Re: [one-users] oZones Server Incomplete Information 
> 
> Tino, 
> I have 2 VMs running, 4 virtual networks defined, multiple images and 
> templates defined prior to adding to oZones. 
> 
>  
> From: "Tino Vazquez"  
> To: "Bill Campbell"  
> Cc: "users"  
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:19:14 PM 
> Subject: Re: [one-users] oZones Server Incomplete Information 
> 
> Hi Bill, 
> 
> Just checking, are there VMs running in the zone? Could it be that 
> there are no vms, templates, images nor vnets defined in the 
> OpenNebula instance running in the zone? 
> 
> I'll check the users CLI bug, and come back if I need more input for 
> debugging, thanks for the feedback. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> -Tino 
> -- 
> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple 
> 
> -- 
> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc 
> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs 
> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova 
> 
> -- 
> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and 
> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is 
> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person 
> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the 
> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. 
> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this 
> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be 
> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us 
> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and 
> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your 
> cooperation. 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Campbell, Bill 
>  wrote: 
>> I've had the same result on 4.2 and 4.4 
>> 
>> The CLI output is the same, but 'user' exhibits an error (all the others 
>> report back appropriate information). Not sure if that's related, but the 
>> user information shows up just fine in the Web UI: 
>> 
>> oneadmin@opennebula:~$ onezone show 3 vm 
>> ZONE E-Comm Lab INFORMATION 
>> ID : 3 
>> NAME : E-Comm Lab 
>> ZONE ADMIN : oneadmin 
>> ZONE PASS : PvrIdBbb+iOBb6fUxKOqwiK2lHn5LB5X/vm0iynSMzg= 
>> ENDPOINT : http://localhost:2633/RPC2 
>> SUNSENDPOINT : http://opennebula.ecommlab.local:9869/ 
>> # VDCS : 0 
>> 
>> 
>> oneadmin@opennebula:~$ onezone show 3 host 
>> ZONE E-Comm Lab INFORMATION 
>> ID : 3 
>> NAME : E-Comm Lab 
>> ZONE ADMIN : oneadmin 
>> ZONE PASS : PvrIdBbb+iOBb6fUxKOqwiK2lHn5LB5X/vm0iynSMzg= 
>> ENDPOINT : http://localhost:2633/RPC2 
>> SUNSENDPOINT : http://opennebula.ecommlab.local:9869/ 
>> #

Re: [one-users] Weekly snapshots

[Giancarlo]

Yes
But.is  more simple with onevm command.


Cheers
Giancarlo


Il 05/12/2013 13:11, Carlos Martín Sánchez ha scritto:

Hi,
e
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Giancarlo > wrote:


Thanks...
but if i want create a scheduled action from cron job what's the
db table that i must write??


You mean in the opennebula database? I was thinking of a cron job that 
simply calls the 'onevm snapshot-create' command.

--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org  | 
cmar...@opennebula.org  | @OpenNebula 





___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Nebula delivering a read only SO

[Eduardo Roloff]

Hello Tino,

In the Nebula side, the VM is in the RUNNING state, with no errors in the log.

But in the VMWare side, the VM could not boot properly.

The message is related to a non writable disk, and when I manually
permit that the VM write in the disk, when the OS start, the
filesystem is in read only mode.

Is it clear or do I need to provide more information.

Maybe can be something with the template configuration?

Regards,
Eduardo Roloff

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Tino Vazquez  wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> Could you elaborate more on this:
>
>> But in the VMware side, they are delivered in read only mode and I
>> can`t use them.
>
> Not sure what you mean with read only, is it the disk?
>
> Regards,
>
> -Tino
>
> --
> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
>
> --
> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova
>
> --
> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
> cooperation.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Weekly snapshots

[Carlos Martín Sánchez]

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Giancarlo  wrote:

>  Thanks...
> but if i want create a scheduled action from cron job what's the db table
> that i must write??
>

You mean in the opennebula database? I was thinking of a cron job that
simply calls the 'onevm snapshot-create' command.

--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org  | cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula  
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] oZones Server Incomplete Information

[Tino Vazquez]

Hi Bill,

That shouldn't be the case. Can you send the permissions & ownership
of the resource not visible by 'oneadmin'?

I'll try to reproduce that locally.

Regards,

-Tino

--
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple

--
Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova

--
Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
cooperation.


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Campbell, Bill
 wrote:
> Tino,
> I figured out why they are not displaying.
>
> I'm connecting the oZones server using the 'oneadmin' account.  All of the
> missing resources were created and owned by my account (not oneadmin).
> After changing the owner to oneadmin, the resources appeared in oZones.
>
>
> This poses a problem.  Since we have multiple users and would like to use
> oZones as a dashboard for a broad overview of the entire environment, is
> there a way to ensure that all resources, no matter who they are owned by,
> are visible?
>
> 
> From: "Bill Campbell" 
> To: "Tino Vazquez" 
> Cc: "users" 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:42:08 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [one-users] oZones Server Incomplete Information
>
> Tino,
> I have 2 VMs running, 4 virtual networks defined, multiple images and
> templates defined prior to adding to oZones.
>
> 
> From: "Tino Vazquez" 
> To: "Bill Campbell" 
> Cc: "users" 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:19:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [one-users] oZones Server Incomplete Information
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Just checking, are there VMs running in the zone? Could it be that
> there are no  vms, templates, images nor vnets defined in the
> OpenNebula instance running in the zone?
>
> I'll check the users CLI bug, and come back if I need more input for
> debugging, thanks for the feedback.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Tino
> --
> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
>
> --
> Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
> Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
> www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova
>
> --
> Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
> any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
> confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
> and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
> "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
> Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
> communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
> immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
> attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
> cooperation.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Campbell, Bill
>  wrote:
>> I've had the same result on 4.2 and 4.4
>>
>> The CLI output is the same, but 'user' exhibits an error (all the others
>> report back appropriate information).  Not sure if that's related, but the
>> user information shows up just fine in the Web UI:
>>
>> oneadmin@opennebula:~$ onezone show 3 vm
>> ZONE E-Comm Lab INFORMATION
>> ID : 3
>> NAME : E-Comm Lab
>> ZONE ADMIN : oneadmin
>> ZONE PASS : PvrIdBbb+iOBb6fUxKOqwiK2lHn5LB5X/vm0iynSMzg=
>> ENDPOINT : http://localhost:2633/RPC2
>> SUNSENDPOINT : http://opennebula.ecommlab.local:9869/
>> # VDCS : 0
>>
>>
>> oneadmin@opennebula:~$ onezone show 3 host
>> ZONE E-Comm Lab INFORMATION
>> ID : 3
>> NAME : E-Comm Lab
>> ZONE ADMIN : oneadmin
>> ZONE PASS : PvrIdBbb+iOBb6fUxKOqwiK2lHn5LB5X/vm0iynSMzg=
>> ENDPOINT : http://localhost:2633/RPC2
>> SUNSENDPOINT : http://opennebula.ecommlab.local:9869/
>> # VDCS : 0
>>
>>
>> ZONE VIEW - host
>> ID NAME CLUSTER RVM ALLOCATED_CPU ALLOCATED_MEM STAT
>> 0 kvmhost1.ecomml E-Comm La 0 0 / 800 (0%) 0K / 15.7G (0%) on
>> 1 kvmhost2.ecomml E-Comm La 0 0 / 400 (0%) 0K / 7.8G (0%) on
>> 2 kvmhost3.ecomml Support S 2 400 / 400 (100%) 4G / 7.8G (51%) on
>>
>>
>> oneadmin@opennebula:~$ onezone show 3 user
>> ZONE E-Comm Lab INFORMATION
>> ID : 3
>> NAME : E-Comm Lab
>> ZONE ADMIN : oneadmin
>> ZONE PASS : PvrIdBbb+iOBb6fUxKOqwiK2lHn5LB5X/vm0iynSMzg=
>> ENDPOINT : http://localhost:2633/RPC2
>> SUNSENDPOINT : http://opennebula.ecommlab.local:9869/
>> # VDCS : 0
>>
>>
>> ZONE VIEW - user
>>

Re: [one-users] VMWare image on ONE 4.4

[Tino Vazquez]

Hi Eduardo,

All registered vmdks (regardless or whether they are compressed or
not) are renamed to disk.vmdk, for internal handling.

The problem you are experiencing is that the prolog is not copying the
image properly, probably due to a misconfiguration.

Could you check that the following path exists in the relevant ESX host?

 /volumes/vmfs//12/disk.0

Where ds_id is the system datastore identifier.

If it doesn't, check oned.log and the vm log for hints on why the
image hasn't been copied, or send them through for analysis.

Best,

-Tino
--
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple

--
Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova

--
Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
cooperation.


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Eduardo Roloff  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I configured a ONE 4.4 installation with CentOS in the front end and
> ESXi on hosts.
>
> I uploaded an vmware image through sunstone (RHEL-x64.vmdk) using the
> tar.gz format.
>
> But when I try to instantiate a VM using this image the front end
> tranfer the image to the host, but when it tryes to start it it is
> using a diferent vmdk (disk.vmdk), according with the error below.
>
> Wed Dec 4 11:50:26 2013 [VMM][I]: error: internal error Could not
> start domain: FileNotFound - File [0] 12/disk.0/disk.vmdk was not
> found
>
> It is mandatory to use "disk.vmdk" as the disk name for vmware? And in
> case of a slipted disk?
>
> Regards,
> Eduardo
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

[one-users] tap:aio error

[Neelaya Dhatchayani]

Hi

While trying to create vm in opennebula for xen hypervisor I get the
following error

Thu Dec 5 15:32:25 2013 [DiM][I]: New VM state is ACTIVE.
Thu Dec 5 15:32:25 2013 [LCM][I]: New VM state is PROLOG.
Thu Dec 5 15:32:30 2013 [LCM][I]: New VM state is BOOT
Thu Dec 5 15:32:30 2013 [VMM][I]: Generating deployment file:
/var/lib/one/vms/9/deployment.1
Thu Dec 5 15:32:30 2013 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 0
Thu Dec 5 15:32:30 2013 [VMM][I]: Successfully execute network driver
operation: pre.
Thu Dec 5 15:33:01 2013 [VMM][I]: Command execution fail: cat << EOT |
/var/tmp/one/vmm/xen3/deploy '/var/lib/one//datastores/0/9/deployment.1'
'onehost2' 9 onehost2
Thu Dec 5 15:33:01 2013 [VMM][I]: *Error: Device 768 (tap) could not be
connected.*
Thu Dec 5 15:33:01 2013 [VMM][I]: ...:/var/lib/one//datastores/0/9/disk.0
does not exist.
Thu Dec 5 15:33:01 2013 [VMM][E]: Unable
Thu Dec 5 15:33:01 2013 [VMM][I]: ExitCode: 1
Thu Dec 5 15:33:01 2013 [VMM][I]: Failed to execute virtualization driver
operation: deploy.
Thu Dec 5 15:33:01 2013 [VMM][E]: Error deploying virtual machine: Unable
Thu Dec 5 15:33:01 2013 [DiM][I]: New VM state is FAILED

can anone help on this


thanks in advance
neelaya
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Weekly snapshots

[Giancarlo]

Thanks...
but if i want create a scheduled action from cron job what's the db 
table that i must write??




Il 05/12/2013 11:49, Carlos Martín Sánchez ha scritto:

Hi,

You can't define recurrent actions, just specific times. You will need 
to do it outside of the scheduler, e.g. a cron job.


Maybe in future versions we will add support for cron syntax in the 
scheduled actions...


Regards.

--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org  | 
cmar...@opennebula.org  | @OpenNebula 




On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Giancarlo De Filippis 
mailto:gdefilip...@ltbl.it>> wrote:


Hi all,

How can i schedule a weekly (or daily... or monthly) backup via
scheduler?

Thanks all for response!!!

Giancarlo


___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org 
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org




___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] no kernel specified error

[Neelaya Dhatchayani]

Hi Carlos,

Thanks for your help. I changed the kernel attribute to
/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.el5xen.img (kernel of the xen host) in
/etc/one/vmm_exec/vmm_exec_xen3.conf  The error got cleared after this.

regards
neelaya


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez <
cmar...@opennebula.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> You can upload kernel images in the 'files' datastore [1], and then use
> that kernel in your VM template, OS section [2] [3]. Alternatively, you can
> use pygrub, setting the path in VM/OS/BOOTLOADER [4].
>
> Regards.
>
> [1] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:file_ds
> [2]
> http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:img_guide#kernel_and_ramdisk
> [3]
> http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:template#os_and_boot_options_section
> [4]
> http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:xeng#xen_specific_attributes
>
> --
> Carlos Martín, MSc
> Project Engineer
> OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
> www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | 
> @OpenNebula
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Neelaya Dhatchayani 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I tried to deploy a vm in opennebula for xen hypervisor. but i get the
>> error as "no kernel specified error". should i ve to upload a kernel image
>> and if so what kernel image.
>>
>> can anyone help me on this
>>
>> thanks in advance
>> neelaya
>>
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Weekly snapshots

[Carlos Martín Sánchez]

Hi,

You can't define recurrent actions, just specific times. You will need to
do it outside of the scheduler, e.g. a cron job.

Maybe in future versions we will add support for cron syntax in the
scheduled actions...

Regards.

--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Giancarlo De Filippis
wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
> How can i schedule a weekly (or daily... or monthly) backup via scheduler?
>
> Thanks all for response!!!
>
> Giancarlo
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Nebula delivering a read only SO

[Tino Vazquez]

Hi Eduardo,

Could you elaborate more on this:

> But in the VMware side, they are delivered in read only mode and I
> can`t use them.

Not sure what you mean with read only, is it the disk?

Regards,

-Tino

--
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple

--
Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc
Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs
www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova

--
Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and
any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is
confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person
and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the
"To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L..
Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this
communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and
attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your
cooperation.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] Reset installation and start with 4.4 from scratch

[Carlos Martín Sánchez]

Hi,

After you purge and reinstall the packages, you need to make sure to delete
the database. It will be /var/lib/one/one.db with the default sqlite
backend, or the database you chose in mysql. But if opennebula 4.4 finds a
4.2 database it won't break anything, it will simply refuse to start up.

Regards.

--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Mario Giammarco wrote:

> Hello,
> I have installed an opennebula 4.2 for tests on Ubuntu.
> I would like to upgrade to 4.4 resetting all configuration because I start
> from scratch.
> What should I do?
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] no kernel specified error

[Carlos Martín Sánchez]

Hi,

You can upload kernel images in the 'files' datastore [1], and then use
that kernel in your VM template, OS section [2] [3]. Alternatively, you can
use pygrub, setting the path in VM/OS/BOOTLOADER [4].

Regards.

[1] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:file_ds
[2] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:img_guide#kernel_and_ramdisk
[3]
http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:template#os_and_boot_options_section
[4] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:xeng#xen_specific_attributes

--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Neelaya Dhatchayani wrote:

> Hi
>
> I tried to deploy a vm in opennebula for xen hypervisor. but i get the
> error as "no kernel specified error". should i ve to upload a kernel image
> and if so what kernel image.
>
> can anyone help me on this
>
> thanks in advance
> neelaya
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] setting hard limits on OpenNebula resources (memory, disk, etc).

[Carlos Martín Sánchez]

Hi Steven,

Yes, that was a problem in older versions. I think that memory was only
considered if CPU was present.

Both CPU and MEMORY are now mandatory, I believe since version 3.6 when we
added the quotas.

So in current versions the hard limit is enforced always, the VM can be
created but it will not be possible to deploy it. And you can also use soft
limits with user or group quotas [1], this way the VM will be rejected when
the user tries to create it.

Best regards,
Carlos

[1] http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel4.4:quota_auth

--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org |
@OpenNebula


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Steven Timm  wrote:

>
> It appears that if you include a "CPU=n" in your VM definition
> under OpenNebula 3.2, then the corresponding values of
> "ACPU" and "AMEN" that show in onehost list/show are decremented
> to account for that CPU and memory being used.  If you don't have
> that, then the corresponding columns are not decremented.
> Furthermore, it appears that there's no way to allocate memory only.
>
> Since the CPU flag is optional, it doesn't seem like this
> is a reliable way to make sure everyone obeys the allocated memory
> standards.  Have newer opennebula versions gotten better at this?
>
> Steve Timm
>
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Steven Timm wrote:
>
>  I just had a user successfully launch a 64GB VM even though none
>> of my hosts have more than 48GB of physical RAM.  All works fine
>> until you actually try to use more than 48G of RAM, in which case it goes
>> deep into swap.
>>
>> Is there any way that OpenNebula can be configured to just outright
>> reject VM's that request too many resources?  We are running 3.2 right
>> now but would appreciate help for any version.
>>
>> Steve Timm
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525
>> t...@fnal.gov  http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
>> Fermilab Scientific Computing Division, Scientific Computing Services
>> Quad.
>> Grid and Cloud Services Dept., Associate Dept. Head for Cloud Computing
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opennebula.org
>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>>
>>
> --
> Steven C. Timm, Ph.D  (630) 840-8525
> t...@fnal.gov  http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/
> Fermilab Scientific Computing Division, Scientific Computing Services Quad.
> Grid and Cloud Services Dept., Associate Dept. Head for Cloud Computing
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opennebula.org
> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

[one-users] opennebula 4.4 with esxi 5.1 novnc could not input “ABCD”

[hansz]

hi man，
today i install opennebula4.4 one centso6.4 with esxi  ,but i cloud not input  
the Uppercase Letters（A-Z) too ,like the opennebula 4.2 .
anything wrong?___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

[one-users] how to use CAS to sso with other web portal in sunstone?

[jack]

 Dear:
I want to use CAS to sso with other web portal in sunstone. Can you tell me how 
to do?

Thanks a lot.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

[one-users] help:how to use CAS in sunstone?

[jack]

 Dear:
I want to use CAS to sso with my other web portal in sunstone. How to?
thanks a lot.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org