Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
Hi, do you have news about this mediaproxy issues ? Thanks, Dani On 05/03/11 11:52, Dani Popa wrote: Ok, Thanks, Dani On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé s...@ag-projects.com mailto:s...@ag-projects.com wrote: On 05/02/2011 10:58 PM, Dani Popa wrote: Hi, Do you have any news with this issues ? Unfortunately not. I didn't have time to go and fix this yet, sorry. -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- Dani Popa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
Not yet, sorry. When a new release is made addressing this (and other) issues it will be announced. On May 18, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Dani Popa wrote: Hi, do you have news about this mediaproxy issues ? Thanks, Dani On 05/03/11 11:52, Dani Popa wrote: Ok, Thanks, Dani On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé s...@ag-projects.com wrote: On 05/02/2011 10:58 PM, Dani Popa wrote: Hi, Do you have any news with this issues ? Unfortunately not. I didn't have time to go and fix this yet, sorry. -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- Dani Popa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
On 05/02/2011 10:58 PM, Dani Popa wrote: Hi, Do you have any news with this issues ? Unfortunately not. I didn't have time to go and fix this yet, sorry. -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
Ok, Thanks, Dani On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé s...@ag-projects.comwrote: On 05/02/2011 10:58 PM, Dani Popa wrote: Hi, Do you have any news with this issues ? Unfortunately not. I didn't have time to go and fix this yet, sorry. -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- Dani Popa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
Hi, Do you have any news with this issues ? Thanks, Dani On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Dani Popa dani.p...@gmail.com wrote: OK, Thanks, Dani On 04/21/11 15:14, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: I'm not talking abut binding ports for streams, i'm talking about stream packets and bytes info on telnet localhost 25060. I meant the statisticas that get printed in syslog after the call is closed. [{from_tag: 4fc7812b, start_time: 1303386789.09, call_id: f233072fb063d5c554bebffe80248eba@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0, duration: 24, streams: [{status: active, caller_codec: G711u, post_dial_delay: 3.49981117249, callee_codec: G711u, caller_bytes: 0, start_time: 0, callee_packets: 0, callee_bytes: 0, caller_packets: 0, callee_remote: X.X.X.X:8752, end_time: 24, caller_remote: X.X.X.X:5014, media_type: audio, callee_local: X.X.X.X:50006, timeout_wait: 0, caller_local: X.X.X.X:50004}], to_tag: a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c848e314110, to_uri: 123456...@gigi.ro, caller_ua: Jitsi1.0-beta1-nightly.build.3408Linux, callee_ua: Cantata, from_uri: dani.p...@gigi.ro}] And also, when mediaproxy send radius acounting request, it send with : caller_bytes: 0, callee_packets: 0, callee_bytes: 0, caller_packets: 0 This could be due to the bug with the netfilter integration which I need to look into. -- Dani Popa ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
Hi, Thanks for the report, I was able to reproduce this on a Squeeze system. We need to adapt to changes in latest libnetfilter-conntrack. Did you try to install the Debian package from our repository? Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
Hi, yes, i was able to install it and run it, but i have some issues. I dont have stream statistics: caller_bytes,callee_bytes,caller_packets and callee_packets. Also, if i'm not sure if media timeout is working, because i tried to simulate a hang call (in the middle of call, i restart my hardphone) and call was not terminated with timeout after stream_timeout seconds. Indeed, i saw rtp packets in one way. Dani On 04/21/11 13:37, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: Hi, Thanks for the report, I was able to reproduce this on a Squeeze system. We need to adapt to changes in latest libnetfilter-conntrack. Did you try to install the Debian package from our repository? Regards, ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
On 04/21/2011 12:44 PM, Dani Popa wrote: Hi, yes, i was able to install it and run it, but i have some issues. I dont have stream statistics: caller_bytes,callee_bytes,caller_packets and callee_packets. Also, if i'm not sure if media timeout is working, because i tried to simulate a hang call (in the middle of call, i restart my hardphone) and call was not terminated with timeout after stream_timeout seconds. Indeed, i saw rtp packets in one way. MediaProxy will not terminate the session is there are RTP packets flowing in at least one direction. Stream timeout only kicks in if RTP stops from both sides. About the statistics, can you paste what you get on syslog after a successful call with RTP? Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
sure, Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50012 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50013 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50014 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50015 Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50012 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50013 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50014 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50015 Closed) s Also, i'm not very sure when(i'll make more tests and i'll come with updates) and what conditions i get next kernel errors: Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838816] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink. Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838957] [ cut here ] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838971] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.37-1-i386-vxjyZA/linux-2.6-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i38 6_none/mm/page_alloc.c:1990 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff() Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838978] Hardware name: PowerEdge R310 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838980] Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_netlink xt_NOTRACK xt_tcpudp iptable_raw nfnetlink iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables x_tables loop snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc evdev button tpm_tis tpm processor pcspkr dcdbas ghes thermal_sys hed tpm_bios power_meter ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic ata_piix libata mptsas mptscsih mptbase ehci_hcd scsi_transport_sas usbcore scsi_mod bnx2 nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839030] Pid: 2521, comm: media-relay Not tainted 2.6.37-1-686-bigmem #1 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839033] Call Trace: Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839041] [c1036005] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x7b Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839047] [c10986c8] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839052] [c1036023] ? warn_slowpath_null+0xd/0x10 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839058] [c10986c8] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839068] [c102cd47] ? select_task_rq_fair+0x326/0x604 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839071] [c1098b57] ? __get_free_pages+0xc/0x17 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839074] [c10be2c7] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x32/0x127 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839077] [f8d6c4da] ? nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839080] [c11fbb07] ? __alloc_skb+0x4c/0xda Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839082] [f8d6c4da] ? nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839085] [f8d6e228] ? ctnetlink_conntrack_event+0x11e/0x3f2 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839087] [f8d6c303] ? nf_conntrack_eventmask_report+0x98/0xfb [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839090] [f8d6c468] ? ctnetlink_del_conntrack+0xee/0x142 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839094] [f8d36222] ? nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12b/0x15c [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839097] [f8d360f7] ? nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x15c [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839102] [c121bd58] ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x2d/0x72 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839105] [f8d360f1] ? nfnetlink_rcv+0x18/0x1e [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839107] [c121bbac] ? netlink_unicast+0xba/0x10e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839109] [c121c6b0] ? netlink_sendmsg+0x23d/0x256 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839112] [c11f5326] ? __sock_sendmsg+0x48/0x4e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839114] [c11f558f] ? sock_sendmsg+0x78/0x8f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839117] [c11c3cc4] ? extract_entropy+0x62/0x101 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839119] [c10bc6d0] ? add_partial+0xe/0x40 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839122] [c1093b34] ? find_get_page+0x19/0x5e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839124] [c10952e4] ? filemap_fault+0x196/0x33f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839127] [c1027195] ? __kunmap_atomic+0x61/0x79 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839129] [c114fc19] ? _copy_from_user+0x2b/0x10e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839131] [c11f6015] ? sys_sendto+0xed/0x121 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839134] [c10c3e13] ? alloc_file+0xf/0x89 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839138] [c12a0793] ? do_page_fault+0x353/0x36f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839140] [c12a0780] ? do_page_fault+0x340/0x36f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839142] [c11f6f88] ? sys_socketcall+0x10a/0x1cb Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839145] [c1008b1f] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28 Apr 19 05:53:36
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
On 04/21/2011 01:06 PM, Dani Popa wrote: sure, Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50012 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50013 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50014 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50015 Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50012 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50013 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50014 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50015 Closed) Don't you get teh statistics printed here? s Also, i'm not very sure when(i'll make more tests and i'll come with updates) and what conditions i get next kernel errors: Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838816] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink. Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838957] [ cut here ] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838971] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.37-1-i386-vxjyZA/linux-2.6-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i38 6_none/mm/page_alloc.c:1990 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff() Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838978] Hardware name: PowerEdge R310 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838980] Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_netlink xt_NOTRACK xt_tcpudp iptable_raw nfnetlink iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables x_tables loop snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc evdev button tpm_tis tpm processor pcspkr dcdbas ghes thermal_sys hed tpm_bios power_meter ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic ata_piix libata mptsas mptscsih mptbase ehci_hcd scsi_transport_sas usbcore scsi_mod bnx2 nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839030] Pid: 2521, comm: media-relay Not tainted 2.6.37-1-686-bigmem #1 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839033] Call Trace: Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839041] [c1036005] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x7b Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839047] [c10986c8] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839052] [c1036023] ? warn_slowpath_null+0xd/0x10 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839058] [c10986c8] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839068] [c102cd47] ? select_task_rq_fair+0x326/0x604 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839071] [c1098b57] ? __get_free_pages+0xc/0x17 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839074] [c10be2c7] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x32/0x127 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839077] [f8d6c4da] ? nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839080] [c11fbb07] ? __alloc_skb+0x4c/0xda Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839082] [f8d6c4da] ? nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839085] [f8d6e228] ? ctnetlink_conntrack_event+0x11e/0x3f2 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839087] [f8d6c303] ? nf_conntrack_eventmask_report+0x98/0xfb [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839090] [f8d6c468] ? ctnetlink_del_conntrack+0xee/0x142 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839094] [f8d36222] ? nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12b/0x15c [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839097] [f8d360f7] ? nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x15c [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839102] [c121bd58] ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x2d/0x72 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839105] [f8d360f1] ? nfnetlink_rcv+0x18/0x1e [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839107] [c121bbac] ? netlink_unicast+0xba/0x10e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839109] [c121c6b0] ? netlink_sendmsg+0x23d/0x256 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839112] [c11f5326] ? __sock_sendmsg+0x48/0x4e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839114] [c11f558f] ? sock_sendmsg+0x78/0x8f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839117] [c11c3cc4] ? extract_entropy+0x62/0x101 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839119] [c10bc6d0] ? add_partial+0xe/0x40 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839122] [c1093b34] ? find_get_page+0x19/0x5e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839124] [c10952e4] ? filemap_fault+0x196/0x33f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839127] [c1027195] ? __kunmap_atomic+0x61/0x79 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839129] [c114fc19] ? _copy_from_user+0x2b/0x10e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839131] [c11f6015] ? sys_sendto+0xed/0x121 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839134] [c10c3e13] ? alloc_file+0xf/0x89 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839138] [c12a0793] ? do_page_fault+0x353/0x36f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839140] [c12a0780] ? do_page_fault+0x340/0x36f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839142] [c11f6f88] ? sys_socketcall+0x10a/0x1cb Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839145] [c1008b1f] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839147] ---[ end
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
On 04/21/11 14:13, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: On 04/21/2011 01:06 PM, Dani Popa wrote: sure, Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50012 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50013 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50014 Apr 21 06:06:41 test media-relay[4903]: mediaproxy.mediacontrol.StreamListenerProtocol starting on 50015 Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50012 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50013 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50014 Closed) Apr 21 06:06:50 test media-relay[4903]: (Port 50015 Closed) Don't you get teh statistics printed here? I'm not talking abut binding ports for streams, i'm talking about stream packets and bytes info on telnet localhost 25060. [{from_tag: 4fc7812b, start_time: 1303386789.09, call_id: f233072fb063d5c554bebffe80248eba@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0, duration: 24, streams: [{status: active, caller_codec: G711u, post_dial_delay: 3.49981117249, callee_codec: G711u, caller_bytes: 0, start_time: 0, callee_packets: 0, callee_bytes: 0, caller_packets: 0, callee_remote: X.X.X.X:8752, end_time: 24, caller_remote: X.X.X.X:5014, media_type: audio, callee_local: X.X.X.X:50006, timeout_wait: 0, caller_local: X.X.X.X:50004}], to_tag: a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c848e314110, to_uri: 123456...@gigi.ro, caller_ua: Jitsi1.0-beta1-nightly.build.3408Linux, callee_ua: Cantata, from_uri: dani.p...@gigi.ro}] And also, when mediaproxy send radius acounting request, it send with : caller_bytes: 0, callee_packets: 0, callee_bytes: 0, caller_packets: 0 s Also, i'm not very sure when(i'll make more tests and i'll come with updates) and what conditions i get next kernel errors: Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838816] ctnetlink v0.93: registering with nfnetlink. Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838957] [ cut here ] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838971] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.37-1-i386-vxjyZA/linux-2.6-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i38 6_none/mm/page_alloc.c:1990 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff() Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838978] Hardware name: PowerEdge R310 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.838980] Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_netlink xt_NOTRACK xt_tcpudp iptable_raw nfnetlink iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables x_tables loop snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc evdev button tpm_tis tpm processor pcspkr dcdbas ghes thermal_sys hed tpm_bios power_meter ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic ata_piix libata mptsas mptscsih mptbase ehci_hcd scsi_transport_sas usbcore scsi_mod bnx2 nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839030] Pid: 2521, comm: media-relay Not tainted 2.6.37-1-686-bigmem #1 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839033] Call Trace: Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839041] [c1036005] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x6a/0x7b Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839047] [c10986c8] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839052] [c1036023] ? warn_slowpath_null+0xd/0x10 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839058] [c10986c8] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x17c/0x5ff Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839068] [c102cd47] ? select_task_rq_fair+0x326/0x604 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839071] [c1098b57] ? __get_free_pages+0xc/0x17 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839074] [c10be2c7] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x32/0x127 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839077] [f8d6c4da] ? nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839080] [c11fbb07] ? __alloc_skb+0x4c/0xda Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839082] [f8d6c4da] ? nlmsg_new+0xf/0x11 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839085] [f8d6e228] ? ctnetlink_conntrack_event+0x11e/0x3f2 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839087] [f8d6c303] ? nf_conntrack_eventmask_report+0x98/0xfb [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839090] [f8d6c468] ? ctnetlink_del_conntrack+0xee/0x142 [nf_conntrack_netlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839094] [f8d36222] ? nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12b/0x15c [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839097] [f8d360f7] ? nfnetlink_rcv_msg+0x0/0x15c [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839102] [c121bd58] ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x2d/0x72 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839105] [f8d360f1] ? nfnetlink_rcv+0x18/0x1e [nfnetlink] Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839107] [c121bbac] ? netlink_unicast+0xba/0x10e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839109] [c121c6b0] ? netlink_sendmsg+0x23d/0x256 Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839112] [c11f5326] ? __sock_sendmsg+0x48/0x4e Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel: [ 209.839114] [c11f558f] ? sock_sendmsg+0x78/0x8f Apr 19 05:53:36 test kernel:
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
I'm not talking abut binding ports for streams, i'm talking about stream packets and bytes info on telnet localhost 25060. I meant the statisticas that get printed in syslog after the call is closed. [{from_tag: 4fc7812b, start_time: 1303386789.09, call_id: f233072fb063d5c554bebffe80248eba@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0, duration: 24, streams: [{status: active, caller_codec: G711u, post_dial_delay: 3.49981117249, callee_codec: G711u, caller_bytes: 0, start_time: 0, callee_packets: 0, callee_bytes: 0, caller_packets: 0, callee_remote: X.X.X.X:8752, end_time: 24, caller_remote: X.X.X.X:5014, media_type: audio, callee_local: X.X.X.X:50006, timeout_wait: 0, caller_local: X.X.X.X:50004}], to_tag: a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c848e314110, to_uri: 123456...@gigi.ro, caller_ua: Jitsi1.0-beta1-nightly.build.3408Linux, callee_ua: Cantata, from_uri: dani.p...@gigi.ro}] And also, when mediaproxy send radius acounting request, it send with : caller_bytes: 0, callee_packets: 0, callee_bytes: 0, caller_packets: 0 This could be due to the bug with the netfilter integration which I need to look into. -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mediaproxy build fail: libiptc.c:63:8: error: redefinition of â
OK, Thanks, Dani On 04/21/11 15:14, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: I'm not talking abut binding ports for streams, i'm talking about stream packets and bytes info on telnet localhost 25060. I meant the statisticas that get printed in syslog after the call is closed. [{from_tag: 4fc7812b, start_time: 1303386789.09, call_id: f233072fb063d5c554bebffe80248eba@0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0, duration: 24, streams: [{status: active, caller_codec: G711u, post_dial_delay: 3.49981117249, callee_codec: G711u, caller_bytes: 0, start_time: 0, callee_packets: 0, callee_bytes: 0, caller_packets: 0, callee_remote: X.X.X.X:8752, end_time: 24, caller_remote: X.X.X.X:5014, media_type: audio, callee_local: X.X.X.X:50006, timeout_wait: 0, caller_local: X.X.X.X:50004}], to_tag: a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c848e314110, to_uri: 123456...@gigi.ro, caller_ua: Jitsi1.0-beta1-nightly.build.3408Linux, callee_ua: Cantata, from_uri: dani.p...@gigi.ro}] And also, when mediaproxy send radius acounting request, it send with : caller_bytes: 0, callee_packets: 0, callee_bytes: 0, caller_packets: 0 This could be due to the bug with the netfilter integration which I need to look into. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users