Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hi Uwe,
Sorry for the delay - I took a look at the logs and there is what I
understand from there:
- I guess you do a parallel forking as the 486 comes from a second
branch (id 1 starting from 0) (see ;branch=z9hG4bK52ad.7d455a97.1 )
- The TM decides to store the reply without relaying
DBG:tm:relay_reply: branch=1, save=1, relay=-1 TM does not relay it
as probably there is no final reply on the first branch (id = 0).
So, the final reply is not forwarded because not all branches are
completed yet, so TM cannot pick yet a final reply to be sent to UAC.
It is a typical behaviour during parallel forking.
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hello,
Ok. I need to have that forward() in my configuration the get answers
like 404, 486, 487 back to my asterisk. Reading your statements this
should not be possible since I use t_relay for the requests and the
replys should be routed by default.
I will make a trace and post it to the list. One with forward and the
other without.
BR and Thanks in advance
Uwe
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
Uwe,
forward() is a function exclusivly used for REQUESTS - for replies,
nothing needs to be done as OpenSIPS will do it automatically:
1) if the requests was statefully forwarded (via t_relay() ), the
transaction will contain all the info to route back the reply
2) if the requests was statelessly forwarded (via forward() ), the VIA
stack (in received reply) will contain all the info to route back the reply
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I need to route this
replys with an reply_route and forward them explicitly to the pstn
gateway.
and how do you do reply routing ?? replies are automatically routed
based on VIA stack and you cannot influence this from script.
...
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
t_on_reply(1);
}
onreply_route[1] {
xlog(L_DBG,== route [1] t_on_failure msg-len from $si:$sp:
$ml \n$mb\n ==\n);
forward(10.20.30.101:5100);
}
BR
Uwe
Regards,
Bogdan
This not as it should be?
BR
Uwe
using forward() forces a stateless behaviour of OpenSIPS. To be able to
catch replies for a requests (what on_reply route does) it requires a
statefull approach. This is the reason it does not work for you.
If you use t_relay() instead of forward(), you should be able to use
failure and onreply routes.
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hello,
I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are
not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I
route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto,
busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the
mediagw.
So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages?
BR
uwe
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hi Uwe, Uwe Kastens wrote: Hi Bogdan, Seems that my question was not very clear. I would expect that reply messages would be handled automatically, if I use t_relay. whatever forwarding function you are using (forward / t_relay), the replies are automatically routed back by opensips core without any help from script. This seems not to happen in my setup. could you post a sip trace of a failing reply ? I need to route this replys with an reply_route and forward them explicitly to the pstn gateway. and how do you do reply routing ?? replies are automatically routed based on VIA stack and you cannot influence this from script. Regards, Bogdan This not as it should be? BR Uwe using forward() forces a stateless behaviour of OpenSIPS. To be able to catch replies for a requests (what on_reply route does) it requires a statefull approach. This is the reason it does not work for you. If you use t_relay() instead of forward(), you should be able to use failure and onreply routes. Regards, Bogdan Uwe Kastens wrote: Hello, I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto, busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the mediagw. So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages? BR uwe ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hi Bogdan,
I need to route this
replys with an reply_route and forward them explicitly to the pstn gateway.
and how do you do reply routing ?? replies are automatically routed
based on VIA stack and you cannot influence this from script.
...
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
t_on_reply(1);
}
onreply_route[1] {
xlog(L_DBG,== route [1] t_on_failure msg-len from $si:$sp:
$ml \n$mb\n ==\n);
forward(10.20.30.101:5100);
}
BR
Uwe
Regards,
Bogdan
This not as it should be?
BR
Uwe
using forward() forces a stateless behaviour of OpenSIPS. To be able to
catch replies for a requests (what on_reply route does) it requires a
statefull approach. This is the reason it does not work for you.
If you use t_relay() instead of forward(), you should be able to use
failure and onreply routes.
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hello,
I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are
not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I
route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto,
busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the mediagw.
So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages?
BR
uwe
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Replies are automatically routed only if they are statefully routed.
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I need to route this
replys with an reply_route and forward them explicitly to the pstn gateway.
and how do you do reply routing ?? replies are automatically routed
based on VIA stack and you cannot influence this from script.
...
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
t_on_reply(1);
}
onreply_route[1] {
xlog(L_DBG,== route [1] t_on_failure msg-len from $si:$sp:
$ml \n$mb\n ==\n);
forward(10.20.30.101:5100);
}
BR
Uwe
Regards,
Bogdan
This not as it should be?
BR
Uwe
using forward() forces a stateless behaviour of OpenSIPS. To be able to
catch replies for a requests (what on_reply route does) it requires a
statefull approach. This is the reason it does not work for you.
If you use t_relay() instead of forward(), you should be able to use
failure and onreply routes.
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hello,
I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are
not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I
route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto,
busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the mediagw.
So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages?
BR
uwe
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hi, Replies are automatically routed only if they are statefully routed. Statefull = t_relay() ? BR Uwe -- kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Uwe Kastens wrote: Replies are automatically routed only if they are statefully routed. Statefull = t_relay() ? Yes. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Uwe Kastens wrote: Hi, Replies are automatically routed only if they are statefully routed. Statefull = t_relay() ? Keep in mind, you can't really mix stateful and stateless handling for what are hopefully obvious reasons. If you statelessly direct a reply, the stateful transaction layer used to open the transaction from the initial request will not know that you did so, and vice versa, etc etc. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hello,
Ok. I need to have that forward() in my configuration the get answers
like 404, 486, 487 back to my asterisk. Reading your statements this
should not be possible since I use t_relay for the requests and the
replys should be routed by default.
I will make a trace and post it to the list. One with forward and the
other without.
BR and Thanks in advance
Uwe
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
Uwe,
forward() is a function exclusivly used for REQUESTS - for replies,
nothing needs to be done as OpenSIPS will do it automatically:
1) if the requests was statefully forwarded (via t_relay() ), the
transaction will contain all the info to route back the reply
2) if the requests was statelessly forwarded (via forward() ), the VIA
stack (in received reply) will contain all the info to route back the reply
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I need to route this
replys with an reply_route and forward them explicitly to the pstn gateway.
and how do you do reply routing ?? replies are automatically routed
based on VIA stack and you cannot influence this from script.
...
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
t_on_reply(1);
}
onreply_route[1] {
xlog(L_DBG,== route [1] t_on_failure msg-len from $si:$sp:
$ml \n$mb\n ==\n);
forward(10.20.30.101:5100);
}
BR
Uwe
Regards,
Bogdan
This not as it should be?
BR
Uwe
using forward() forces a stateless behaviour of OpenSIPS. To be able to
catch replies for a requests (what on_reply route does) it requires a
statefull approach. This is the reason it does not work for you.
If you use t_relay() instead of forward(), you should be able to use
failure and onreply routes.
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hello,
I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are
not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I
route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto,
busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the mediagw.
So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages?
BR
uwe
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Uwe,
forward() is a function exclusivly used for REQUESTS - for replies,
nothing needs to be done as OpenSIPS will do it automatically:
1) if the requests was statefully forwarded (via t_relay() ), the
transaction will contain all the info to route back the reply
2) if the requests was statelessly forwarded (via forward() ), the VIA
stack (in received reply) will contain all the info to route back the reply
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I need to route this
replys with an reply_route and forward them explicitly to the pstn gateway.
and how do you do reply routing ?? replies are automatically routed
based on VIA stack and you cannot influence this from script.
...
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
t_on_reply(1);
}
onreply_route[1] {
xlog(L_DBG,== route [1] t_on_failure msg-len from $si:$sp:
$ml \n$mb\n ==\n);
forward(10.20.30.101:5100);
}
BR
Uwe
Regards,
Bogdan
This not as it should be?
BR
Uwe
using forward() forces a stateless behaviour of OpenSIPS. To be able to
catch replies for a requests (what on_reply route does) it requires a
statefull approach. This is the reason it does not work for you.
If you use t_relay() instead of forward(), you should be able to use
failure and onreply routes.
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hello,
I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are
not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I
route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto,
busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the mediagw.
So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages?
BR
uwe
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hi, you do not need to do any routing in onreply route at all, in none of the case (stateless or statefull) I will make a trace and post it to the list. One with forward and the other without. make a trace and opensips logs. I have attached opensips.log with debug=9. w_forward_an.gz = with forward wo_forward_an.gz = without forward BR Uwe -- kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586 w_forward_an.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data wo_forward_an.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
2) if the requests was statelessly forwarded (via forward() ), the VIA
stack (in received reply) will contain all the info to route back the reply
I think the question is whether stateless forwarding can be used to
override default processing of Via and route the reply somewhere else.
You can, for example, do this (whether in stateless or stateful request
forwarding mode):
onreply_route[1] {
drop;
}
... I think it's along that general train of thought.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hi Bogdan, Seems that my question was not very clear. I would expect that reply messages would be handled automatically, if I use t_relay. This seems not to happen in my setup. I need to route this replys with an reply_route and forward them explicitly to the pstn gateway. This not as it should be? BR Uwe using forward() forces a stateless behaviour of OpenSIPS. To be able to catch replies for a requests (what on_reply route does) it requires a statefull approach. This is the reason it does not work for you. If you use t_relay() instead of forward(), you should be able to use failure and onreply routes. Regards, Bogdan Uwe Kastens wrote: Hello, I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto, busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the mediagw. So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages? BR uwe ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
[OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hello, I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto, busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the mediagw. So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages? BR uwe -- kiste lat: 54.322684, lon: 10.13586 ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] explizit handling auf replyto
Hi Uwe, using forward() forces a stateless behaviour of OpenSIPS. To be able to catch replies for a requests (what on_reply route does) it requires a statefull approach. This is the reason it does not work for you. If you use t_relay() instead of forward(), you should be able to use failure and onreply routes. Regards, Bogdan Uwe Kastens wrote: Hello, I am using opensips 1.5.1 and I have the problem, that busy messages are not passed to the mediagw. Anything else is working (ACK etc.pp.). If I route that message via forward(IP:port) to the media gw in on_replyto, busy is processed correctly. If not, the busy is not send to the mediagw. So I was wondering if I had to handle some replyto messages? BR uwe ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
