Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
On Mar 10, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Kaare Nilsen wrote: AFAIK this is still valid : http://www.cenqua.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=13711㖏 But this not what I said... I explicitely mentioned that you have to run them in the right order... See my message below :) -Vincent On 10/03/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Kaare Nilsen wrote: > On 09/03/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mar 9, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Steve Shucker wrote: >> >> > I don't think AspectJ and Clover are compatible. >> >> Hmmm they might be if you run them in the right order. Run Clover >> first on sources and then AspectJ on either generated sources or on >> the JAR. This should work I think, although I don't recall having >> tried this. > > Don't think it is possible even if you run aspectJ on the generated > source. All the references I am able to find on the net says it's not > possible, and this is also my own experience Can you explain why it's not possible in a few words? Thanks -Vincent >> > We use Cobertura instead. The coverage report isn't as nice, but >> > it is functional. For maven1, there's also an emma plugin. >> > >> > -Steve >> > >> > Michael Waluk wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I can't find much else regarding using AspectJ with Clover. Were >> >> you able >> >> to get it working with an example AspectJ project? >> >> >> >> Has anyone been successful with this yet? We have it to the point >> >> where we >> >> are getting 0% coverage for some reason, but I haven't spent much >> >> time on >> >> it. I'd bother if there were some success stories out there. >> >> >> >> Thanks for any info, >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > -Original Message- >> >>> > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 >> >>> > To: Maven Users List >> >>> > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? >> >>> > >> >>> > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do >> >>> this. To >> >>> > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and >> provide the >> >>> > javaagent as an >> >>> > > >> >>> > > -Original Message- >> >>> > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM >> >>> > > To: 'Maven Users List' >> >>> > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > -Original Message- >> >>> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> >>> Behalf Of >> >>> > Carlos >> >>> > > > Sanchez >> >>> > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 >> >>> > > > To: Maven Users List >> >>> > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report >> >>> when using >> >>> > > > > AspectJ in a project? >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the >> >>> code, which >> >>> > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > seems not possible: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > [quote] >> >>> > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that >> >>> for now, >> >>> so >> >>> > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. >> >>> > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE >
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
AFAIK this is still valid : http://www.cenqua.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=13711㖏 On 10/03/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Kaare Nilsen wrote: > On 09/03/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mar 9, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Steve Shucker wrote: >> >> > I don't think AspectJ and Clover are compatible. >> >> Hmmm they might be if you run them in the right order. Run Clover >> first on sources and then AspectJ on either generated sources or on >> the JAR. This should work I think, although I don't recall having >> tried this. > > Don't think it is possible even if you run aspectJ on the generated > source. All the references I am able to find on the net says it's not > possible, and this is also my own experience Can you explain why it's not possible in a few words? Thanks -Vincent >> > We use Cobertura instead. The coverage report isn't as nice, but >> > it is functional. For maven1, there's also an emma plugin. >> > >> > -Steve >> > >> > Michael Waluk wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I can't find much else regarding using AspectJ with Clover. Were >> >> you able >> >> to get it working with an example AspectJ project? >> >> >> >> Has anyone been successful with this yet? We have it to the point >> >> where we >> >> are getting 0% coverage for some reason, but I haven't spent much >> >> time on >> >> it. I'd bother if there were some success stories out there. >> >> >> >> Thanks for any info, >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > -Original Message- >> >>> > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 >> >>> > To: Maven Users List >> >>> > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? >> >>> > >> >>> > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do >> >>> this. To >> >>> > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and >> provide the >> >>> > javaagent as an >> >>> > > >> >>> > > -Original Message- >> >>> > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM >> >>> > > To: 'Maven Users List' >> >>> > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > -Original Message- >> >>> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> >>> Behalf Of >> >>> > Carlos >> >>> > > > Sanchez >> >>> > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 >> >>> > > > To: Maven Users List >> >>> > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report >> >>> when using >> >>> > > > > AspectJ in a project? >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the >> >>> code, which >> >>> > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > seems not possible: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > [quote] >> >>> > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that >> >>> for now, >> >>> so >> >>> > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. >> >>> > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE >> >>> Clover runs, >> >>> > > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! >> >>> > > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: >> >>>
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Kaare Nilsen wrote: On 09/03/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mar 9, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Steve Shucker wrote: > I don't think AspectJ and Clover are compatible. Hmmm they might be if you run them in the right order. Run Clover first on sources and then AspectJ on either generated sources or on the JAR. This should work I think, although I don't recall having tried this. Don't think it is possible even if you run aspectJ on the generated source. All the references I am able to find on the net says it's not possible, and this is also my own experience Can you explain why it's not possible in a few words? Thanks -Vincent > We use Cobertura instead. The coverage report isn't as nice, but > it is functional. For maven1, there's also an emma plugin. > > -Steve > > Michael Waluk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I can't find much else regarding using AspectJ with Clover. Were >> you able >> to get it working with an example AspectJ project? >> >> Has anyone been successful with this yet? We have it to the point >> where we >> are getting 0% coverage for some reason, but I haven't spent much >> time on >> it. I'd bother if there were some success stories out there. >> >> Thanks for any info, >> Michael >> >> >> On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > -Original Message- >>> > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 >>> > To: Maven Users List >>> > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? >>> > >>> > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do >>> this. To >>> > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the >>> > javaagent as an >>> > > >>> > > -Original Message- >>> > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM >>> > > To: 'Maven Users List' >>> > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > -Original Message- >>> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>> Behalf Of >>> > Carlos >>> > > > Sanchez >>> > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 >>> > > > To: Maven Users List >>> > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? >>> > > > >>> > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report >>> when using >>> > > > > AspectJ in a project? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the >>> code, which >>> > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. >>> > > > >>> > > > seems not possible: >>> > > > >>> > > > [quote] >>> > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that >>> for now, >>> so >>> > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. >>> > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE >>> Clover runs, >>> > > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! >>> > > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: >>> > > > >>> > > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as >>> sources so >>> > > > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that >>> > > > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather >>> on the >>> > > > weaved files. >>> > > >>> > > Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated >>> sources it >>> > should >>> > > work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. >>> > > >>> > > > It's a solution, but what would be really great >>> > > > is: >>> > > > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his >>> statements to >>> > > > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and >>> > > > Cl
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
On 09/03/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mar 9, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Steve Shucker wrote: > I don't think AspectJ and Clover are compatible. Hmmm they might be if you run them in the right order. Run Clover first on sources and then AspectJ on either generated sources or on the JAR. This should work I think, although I don't recall having tried this. Don't think it is possible even if you run aspectJ on the generated source. All the references I am able to find on the net says it's not possible, and this is also my own experience -Vincent > We use Cobertura instead. The coverage report isn't as nice, but > it is functional. For maven1, there's also an emma plugin. > > -Steve > > Michael Waluk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I can't find much else regarding using AspectJ with Clover. Were >> you able >> to get it working with an example AspectJ project? >> >> Has anyone been successful with this yet? We have it to the point >> where we >> are getting 0% coverage for some reason, but I haven't spent much >> time on >> it. I'd bother if there were some success stories out there. >> >> Thanks for any info, >> Michael >> >> >> On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > -Original Message- >>> > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 >>> > To: Maven Users List >>> > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? >>> > >>> > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do >>> this. To >>> > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the >>> > javaagent as an >>> > > >>> > > -Original Message- >>> > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM >>> > > To: 'Maven Users List' >>> > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > -Original Message- >>> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>> Behalf Of >>> > Carlos >>> > > > Sanchez >>> > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 >>> > > > To: Maven Users List >>> > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? >>> > > > >>> > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report >>> when using >>> > > > > AspectJ in a project? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the >>> code, which >>> > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. >>> > > > >>> > > > seems not possible: >>> > > > >>> > > > [quote] >>> > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that >>> for now, >>> so >>> > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. >>> > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE >>> Clover runs, >>> > > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! >>> > > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: >>> > > > >>> > > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as >>> sources so >>> > > > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that >>> > > > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather >>> on the >>> > > > weaved files. >>> > > >>> > > Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated >>> sources it >>> > should >>> > > work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. >>> > > >>> > > > It's a solution, but what would be really great >>> > > > is: >>> > > > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his >>> statements to >>> > > > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and >>> > > > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct >>> files and >>> > > > calculat
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
On Mar 9, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Steve Shucker wrote: I don't think AspectJ and Clover are compatible. Hmmm they might be if you run them in the right order. Run Clover first on sources and then AspectJ on either generated sources or on the JAR. This should work I think, although I don't recall having tried this. -Vincent We use Cobertura instead. The coverage report isn't as nice, but it is functional. For maven1, there's also an emma plugin. -Steve Michael Waluk wrote: Hi, I can't find much else regarding using AspectJ with Clover. Were you able to get it working with an example AspectJ project? Has anyone been successful with this yet? We have it to the point where we are getting 0% coverage for some reason, but I haven't spent much time on it. I'd bother if there were some success stories out there. Thanks for any info, Michael On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do this. To > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the > javaagent as an > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM > > To: 'Maven Users List' > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Carlos > > > Sanchez > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > > > > > seems not possible: > > > > > > [quote] > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > > > > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > > > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > > > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > > > weaved files. > > > > Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it > should > > work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > > > > > It's a solution, but what would be really great > > > is: > > > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > > > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > > > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > > > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > > > been called. > > > > I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in > this > > case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > > > > > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know > > > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > > > plugin will have the same problems... > > > > Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple > aspectj > > project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the > aspectj > > plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try it > > out. > > You will find some here : > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven- > plugin/src/test/projects/ > > But as Carlos mentioned. Clover and aspectJ is not really compatible Thanks for the link. Could you elaborate just a little more about the incompatibility before I spend too much time looking into it? :-) Thanks -Vincent > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > > > > > cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sur
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
I don't think AspectJ and Clover are compatible. We use Cobertura instead. The coverage report isn't as nice, but it is functional. For maven1, there's also an emma plugin. -Steve Michael Waluk wrote: Hi, I can't find much else regarding using AspectJ with Clover. Were you able to get it working with an example AspectJ project? Has anyone been successful with this yet? We have it to the point where we are getting 0% coverage for some reason, but I haven't spent much time on it. I'd bother if there were some success stories out there. Thanks for any info, Michael On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do this. To > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the > javaagent as an > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM > > To: 'Maven Users List' > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Carlos > > > Sanchez > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > > > > > seems not possible: > > > > > > [quote] > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > > > > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > > > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > > > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > > > weaved files. > > > > Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it > should > > work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > > > > > It's a solution, but what would be really great > > > is: > > > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > > > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > > > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > > > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > > > been called. > > > > I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in > this > > case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > > > > > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know > > > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > > > plugin will have the same problems... > > > > Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple > aspectj > > project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the > aspectj > > plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try it > > out. > > You will find some here : > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven- > plugin/src/test/projects/ > > But as Carlos mentioned. Clover and aspectJ is not really compatible Thanks for the link. Could you elaborate just a little more about the incompatibility before I spend too much time looking into it? :-) Thanks -Vincent > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > > > > > cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sure > > > the aspectj plugin doesn't recompile from sources for what I read in > > > the cobertura mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > > > TWD Consulting, Inc. > > > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
Hey, do you know what happened to the training I was supposed to be coming out for? Bal has dropped off the map. On 3/8/07, Michael Waluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I can't find much else regarding using AspectJ with Clover. Were you able to get it working with an example AspectJ project? Has anyone been successful with this yet? We have it to the point where we are getting 0% coverage for some reason, but I haven't spent much time on it. I'd bother if there were some success stories out there. Thanks for any info, Michael On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do this. To > > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the > > javaagent as an > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM > > > To: 'Maven Users List' > > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Carlos > > > > Sanchez > > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > > > > To: Maven Users List > > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > > > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > > > > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > > > > > > > seems not possible: > > > > > > > > [quote] > > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, > so > > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > > > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > > > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > > > > > > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > > > > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > > > > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > > > > weaved files. > > > > > > Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it > > should > > > work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > > > > > > > It's a solution, but what would be really great > > > > is: > > > > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > > > > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > > > > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > > > > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > > > > been called. > > > > > > I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in > > this > > > case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > > > > > > > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't > know > > > > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > > > > plugin will have the same problems... > > > > > > Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple > > aspectj > > > project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the > > aspectj > > > plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try > it > > > out. > > > > You will find some here : > > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven- > > plugin/src/test/projects/ > > > > But as Carlos mentioned. Clover and aspectJ is not really compatible > > Thanks for the link. Could you elaborate just a little more about the > incompatibility before I spend too much time looking into it? :-) > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > > > > >
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
Hi, I can't find much else regarding using AspectJ with Clover. Were you able to get it working with an example AspectJ project? Has anyone been successful with this yet? We have it to the point where we are getting 0% coverage for some reason, but I haven't spent much time on it. I'd bother if there were some success stories out there. Thanks for any info, Michael On 7/26/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do this. To > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the > javaagent as an > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM > > To: 'Maven Users List' > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Carlos > > > Sanchez > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > > > > > seems not possible: > > > > > > [quote] > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > > > > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > > > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > > > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > > > weaved files. > > > > Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it > should > > work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > > > > > It's a solution, but what would be really great > > > is: > > > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > > > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > > > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > > > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > > > been called. > > > > I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in > this > > case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > > > > > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know > > > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > > > plugin will have the same problems... > > > > Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple > aspectj > > project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the > aspectj > > plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try it > > out. > > You will find some here : > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven- > plugin/src/test/projects/ > > But as Carlos mentioned. Clover and aspectJ is not really compatible Thanks for the link. Could you elaborate just a little more about the incompatibility before I spend too much time looking into it? :-) Thanks -Vincent > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > > > > > cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sure > > > the aspectj plugin doesn't recompile from sources for what I read in > > > the cobertura mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > > > TWD Consulting, Inc. > > > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > > > > Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry > > > > Creator, Apache HiveMind > > > > > > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > > > > and project work. ht
RE: Code coverage with AspectJ?
> -Original Message- > From: Kaare Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 19:53 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do this. To > use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the > javaagent as an > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM > > To: 'Maven Users List' > > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Carlos > > > Sanchez > > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > > > > > seems not possible: > > > > > > [quote] > > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so > > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > > > > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > > > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > > > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > > > weaved files. > > > > Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it > should > > work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > > > > > It's a solution, but what would be really great > > > is: > > > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > > > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > > > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > > > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > > > been called. > > > > I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in > this > > case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > > > > > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know > > > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > > > plugin will have the same problems... > > > > Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple > aspectj > > project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the > aspectj > > plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try it > > out. > > You will find some here : > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven- > plugin/src/test/projects/ > > But as Carlos mentioned. Clover and aspectJ is not really compatible Thanks for the link. Could you elaborate just a little more about the incompatibility before I spend too much time looking into it? :-) Thanks -Vincent > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > > > > > cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sure > > > the aspectj plugin doesn't recompile from sources for what I read in > > > the cobertura mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > > > TWD Consulting, Inc. > > > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > > > > Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry > > > > Creator, Apache HiveMind > > > > > > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > > > > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > > No good. I've known t
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
I just copied that from another thread about Clover and AspectJ. I never tried it. On 7/26/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do this. To use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the javaagent as an > > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM > To: 'Maven Users List' > Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos > > Sanchez > > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > > > seems not possible: > > > > [quote] > > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so > > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > > weaved files. > > Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it should > work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > > > It's a solution, but what would be really great > > is: > > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > > been called. > > I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in this > case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > > > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know > > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > > plugin will have the same problems... > > Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple aspectj > project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the aspectj > plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try it > out. You will find some here : http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/src/test/projects/ But as Carlos mentioned. Clover and aspectJ is not really compatible > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > [quote] > > > > > > > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > > > cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sure > > the aspectj plugin doesn't recompile from sources for what I read in > > the cobertura mailing list > > > > > > > > -- > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > > TWD Consulting, Inc. > > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > > > Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry > > > Creator, Apache HiveMind > > > > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > > > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > -- The Princess Bride > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > ___ > Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! > Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. > http://fr.answers.yahoo.com > > >
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
On 26/07/06, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do this. To use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the javaagent as an -Original Message- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM To: 'Maven Users List' Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos > Sanchez > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > seems not possible: > > [quote] > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > weaved files. Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it should work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > It's a solution, but what would be really great > is: > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > been called. I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in this case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > plugin will have the same problems... Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple aspectj project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the aspectj plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try it out. You will find some here : http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/src/test/projects/ But as Carlos mentioned. Clover and aspectJ is not really compatible Thanks -Vincent > [quote] > > > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sure > the aspectj plugin doesn't recompile from sources for what I read in > the cobertura mailing list > > > > > -- > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > TWD Consulting, Inc. > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > > Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry > > Creator, Apache HiveMind > > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Code coverage with AspectJ?
I use cobetura and load-time weaving during unit-tests to do this. To use load-time weaving you must fork at least once and provide the javaagent as an -Original Message- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:42 AM To: 'Maven Users List' Subject: RE: Code coverage with AspectJ? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos > Sanchez > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > seems not possible: > > [quote] > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > weaved files. Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it should work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > It's a solution, but what would be really great > is: > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > been called. I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in this case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > plugin will have the same problems... Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple aspectj project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the aspectj plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try it out. Thanks -Vincent > [quote] > > > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sure > the aspectj plugin doesn't recompile from sources for what I read in > the cobertura mailing list > > > > > -- > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > TWD Consulting, Inc. > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > > Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry > > Creator, Apache HiveMind > > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Code coverage with AspectJ?
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos > Sanchez > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:29 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > > AspectJ in a project? > > > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > seems not possible: > > [quote] > Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so > that I at least have SOME Clover data. > The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, > so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! > As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: > > 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so > Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that > Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the > weaved files. Why not? If you point the Clover plugin to the generated sources it should work fine, no? I guess I'd need to try it. > It's a solution, but what would be really great > is: > 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to > those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and > Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and > calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have > been called. I don't understand this solution. Is clover running before aspectj in this case? If so then we're back to the first solution above, no? > Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know > how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the > plugin will have the same problems... Ah maybe there's some issue. If someone could show me a very simple aspectj project (one simple class, one aspect, one test and a POM using the aspectj plugin) then I could add it to the clover plugin's test suite and try it out. Thanks -Vincent > [quote] > > > > > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? > > cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sure > the aspectj plugin doesn't recompile from sources for what I read in > the cobertura mailing list > > > > > -- > > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > TWD Consulting, Inc. > > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > > Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry > > Creator, Apache HiveMind > > > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Code coverage with AspectJ?
Hi Howard, > -Original Message- > From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 26 juillet 2006 17:19 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Code coverage with AspectJ? > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > AspectJ in a project? > > The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > probably won't play well with all things aspect. I haven't tried it but that should be a good test to add to the clover plugin test suite. There are various possibilities (clover applied before aspectj, aspectj applied before clover, using aspectj to instrument sources, using aspectj to instrument classes). Let's try to imagine what's going to happen. Scenario 1: Clover before AspectJ * clover creates new sources in target/clover/src * aspectj plugin thinks the project sources are in target/clover/src and instrument those I don't see any issue. Scenario 2: AspectJ before Clover * AspectJ instrument sources. I haven't used the aspectj plugin for m2 but I guess it generates classes thus clover is going to simply run but on the original sources and not on the aspectified. Note that this may or may not be what you want :-) In any case I don't any real issue. The scenario 1 sounds the best though. Simply make sure you execute clover:instrument before the aspectj goal in your POM. Any specific issue you can foresee? Thanks -Vincent ___ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
Just tried cobetura plugin but it's giving me 0% coverage: mvn cobertura:cobertura had some hickups on my aspects (NPEs). The tests all run and pass (there would be failures if the aspects weren't in effect), but the output report is all 0% coverage. On 7/26/06, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi 2006/7/26, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using > AspectJ in a project? Sorry, I dunno The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which > probably won't play well with all things aspect. > > Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? Yep at least for cobertura at mojo.codehaus.org Raphaël -- Howard M. Lewis Ship TWD Consulting, Inc. Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Apache HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
On 7/26/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using AspectJ in a project? The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which probably won't play well with all things aspect. seems not possible: [quote] Indeed running AspectJ AFTER Clover works. I'm using that for now, so that I at least have SOME Clover data. The thing I would like though, is to run AspectJ BEFORE Clover runs, so I also have Clover data on the AspectJ-sources! As I see it, there are 2 ways to do this: 1) AspectJ weaves his new files and writes them out as sources so Clover can work on them. The problem here will be that Clover can't show the reports on AspectJ-files, but rather on the weaved files. It's a solution, but what would be really great is: 2) Clover examines the AspectJ sources and adds his statements to those files. Then AspectJ can do his normal thing and Clover's reports should show the coverage in the correct files and calculate the EXACT amount of times the statements have been called. Unfortunately I already heard from Cenqua that atm Clover doesn't know how to handle AspectJ sources... So I think that the plugin will have the same problems... [quote] Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? cobertura, and it plays well with aspectj afaik, you have to make sure the aspectj plugin doesn't recompile from sources for what I read in the cobertura mailing list -- Howard M. Lewis Ship TWD Consulting, Inc. Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Apache HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Code coverage with AspectJ?
Hi 2006/7/26, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Does anyone know how to generate a code coverage report when using AspectJ in a project? Sorry, I dunno The Clover plugin wants to rewrite and recompile the code, which probably won't play well with all things aspect. Is there a Maven2 plugin for emma or cobetura? Yep at least for cobertura at mojo.codehaus.org Raphaël
