Re: Is there any thought of an alternative to jelly?
I think that some of the gang who worked on Jelly are also working on http://groovy.codehaus.org Looks interesting. Aaron Anodide wrote: For instance XSL allows JavaScript processing. I think this would make writing Maven plugins alot easier. Jelly works, but it's awkward imho. Aaron - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is there any thought of an alternative to jelly?
Is there any good reason you can't use the BeanShell of BSF taglibs of Jelly ?? They are there and I know at least that the BeanShell one is working. Is it maybe yet another difficulty of actually encoding the dependencies ? It really looks so... Jelly is basically suffering of not taking completely in charge its cleanly separated sub-projects-structure. Maybe someone should post an example of such within the maven wiki... Using special tags like BSF or BeanShell is actually the way Ant is scripted... Paul On Mardi, nove 25, 2003, at 01:17 Europe/Paris, Brett Porter wrote: In the future maven plugins will be able to be written in other scripting languages than Jelly, but it's a way off. It is planned though. At the moment, probably the best thing to do if you need additional power is write a java bean to handle the plugin code and use Jelly's define tag to access it. There are several examples in the maven-plugins. Cheers, Brett -Original Message- From: Aaron Anodide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 25 November 2003 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is there any thought of an alternative to jelly? For instance XSL allows JavaScript processing. I think this would make writing Maven plugins alot easier. Jelly works, but it's awkward imho. Aaron - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is there any thought of an alternative to jelly?
How easy is it to run Ant tasks in XSL? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ "Aaron Anodide" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/11/2003 11:15:16 AM: > For instance XSL allows JavaScript processing. I think this would make > writing Maven plugins alot easier. Jelly works, but it's awkward imho. > > Aaron > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is there any thought of an alternative to jelly?
In the future maven plugins will be able to be written in other scripting languages than Jelly, but it's a way off. It is planned though. At the moment, probably the best thing to do if you need additional power is write a java bean to handle the plugin code and use Jelly's define tag to access it. There are several examples in the maven-plugins. Cheers, Brett > -Original Message- > From: Aaron Anodide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 25 November 2003 11:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Is there any thought of an alternative to jelly? > > > For instance XSL allows JavaScript processing. I think this > would make writing Maven plugins alot easier. Jelly works, > but it's awkward imho. > > Aaron > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
