Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
I think he's referring to the spring-mock POM. I think it's dependencies on spring-web, spring-jdbc, javax.servlet:jsp-api should probably all be optional as well. Not certain, as I haven't started using spring-mock, but those sound optional to me... -Stephen On 12/22/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The pom at ibiblio is fine, says that they're optional > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spring-1.2.6.pom > > I've used these dependencies and I only get commons-logging and spring > jars in the web-inf lib > > On 12/22/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for > > Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom: > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring > > 1.2.6 > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-mock > > 1.2.6 > > test > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-jdbc > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-web > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is > > > the last change for spring 1.2.6. > > > > > > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now > > > > > that they are maven tries to download them. > > > > > > > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that > > > > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the > > > > only thing you need to run Spring. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything > > > > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency > > > > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. > > > > > > > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I > > > > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I > > > > have to have a bunch to get the same results. > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > > spring > > > > 1.2.6 > > > > > > > > > > > > aopalliance > > > > aopalliance > > > > > > > > > > > > com.servlets > > > > cos > > > > > > > > > > > > quartz > > > > quartz > > > > > > > > > > > > xdoclet > > > > xjavadoc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > > spring-mock > > > > 1.2.6 > > > > test > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > > spring-jdbc > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > > spring-web > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > > > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > > > > > neither works. > > > > > > > > > > > > required artifacts missing: > > > > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > > > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > > > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > > > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will > > > > > > > upload them soon. > > > > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > > > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the > > > > > > > > Maven > > > > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's > > > > > > > > groupId, > > > > > > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the > > > > > > > > following > > > > > > > > warning: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > > > > > > Downloading:
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
springframework just points to org.springframework and you should update your pom On 12/22/05, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using just springframework, not org.springframework and it seems to > work for me. > > > Thanks > Mick Knutson > > http://www.BASELogic.com > http://www.MickKnutson.com > > MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - Original Message - > From: "Matt Raible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Carlos Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Maven Users List" > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 8:41 AM > Subject: Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework > > > It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for > Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom: > > > org.springframework > spring > 1.2.6 > > > org.springframework > spring-mock > 1.2.6 > test > > > org.springframework > spring-jdbc > > > org.springframework > spring-web > > > > > > On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is > > the last change for spring 1.2.6. > > > > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now > > > > that they are maven tries to download them. > > > > > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that > > > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the > > > only thing you need to run Spring. > > > > > > > > > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything > > > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency > > > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. > > > > > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I > > > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I > > > have to have a bunch to get the same results. > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > spring > > > 1.2.6 > > > > > > > > > aopalliance > > > aopalliance > > > > > > > > > com.servlets > > > cos > > > > > > > > > quartz > > > quartz > > > > > > > > > xdoclet > > > xjavadoc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > spring-mock > > > 1.2.6 > > > test > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > spring-jdbc > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > spring-web > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > > > > neither works. > > > > > > > > > > required artifacts missing: > > > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > &g
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
The pom at ibiblio is fine, says that they're optional http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spring-1.2.6.pom I've used these dependencies and I only get commons-logging and spring jars in the web-inf lib On 12/22/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for > Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom: > > > org.springframework > spring > 1.2.6 > > > org.springframework > spring-mock > 1.2.6 > test > > > org.springframework > spring-jdbc > > > org.springframework > spring-web > > > > > > On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is > > the last change for spring 1.2.6. > > > > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now > > > > that they are maven tries to download them. > > > > > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that > > > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the > > > only thing you need to run Spring. > > > > > > > > > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything > > > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency > > > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. > > > > > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I > > > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I > > > have to have a bunch to get the same results. > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > spring > > > 1.2.6 > > > > > > > > > aopalliance > > > aopalliance > > > > > > > > > com.servlets > > > cos > > > > > > > > > quartz > > > quartz > > > > > > > > > xdoclet > > > xjavadoc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > spring-mock > > > 1.2.6 > > > test > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > spring-jdbc > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > > spring-web > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > > > > neither works. > > > > > > > > > > required artifacts missing: > > > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload > > > > > > them soon. > > > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > > > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the > > > > > > > Maven > > > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's > > > > > > > groupId, > > > > > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the > > > > > > > following > > > > > > > warning: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > > > > > Downloading: > > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > > Downloading: > > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > > > > >
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
I am using just springframework, not org.springframework and it seems to work for me. Thanks Mick Knutson http://www.BASELogic.com http://www.MickKnutson.com MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Matt Raible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Carlos Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Maven Users List" Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 8:41 AM Subject: Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom: org.springframework spring 1.2.6 org.springframework spring-mock 1.2.6 test org.springframework spring-jdbc org.springframework spring-web On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is the last change for spring 1.2.6. On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now > > that they are maven tries to download them. > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the > only thing you need to run Spring. > > > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I > have to have a bunch to get the same results. > > > org.springframework > spring > 1.2.6 > > > aopalliance > aopalliance > > > com.servlets > cos > > > quartz > quartz > > > xdoclet > xjavadoc > > > > > org.springframework > spring-mock > 1.2.6 > test > > > org.springframework > spring-jdbc > > > org.springframework > spring-web > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > Matt > > > > > Regards > > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > > neither works. > > > > > > required artifacts missing: > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will > > > > upload them soon. > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because > > > > the > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the > > > > > Maven > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's > > > > > groupId, > > > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for > > > > > the > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the > > > > > following > > > > > warning: > > > > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > >
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
It's been over 24 hours and ibiblio still gives me cos and quartz for Spring. Is the synchronization process broken? Here's my current pom: org.springframework spring 1.2.6 org.springframework spring-mock 1.2.6 test org.springframework spring-jdbc org.springframework spring-web On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is > the last change for spring 1.2.6. > > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now > > > that they are maven tries to download them. > > > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that > > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the > > only thing you need to run Spring. > > > > > > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything > > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency > > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. > > > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I > > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I > > have to have a bunch to get the same results. > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring > > 1.2.6 > > > > > > aopalliance > > aopalliance > > > > > > com.servlets > > cos > > > > > > quartz > > quartz > > > > > > xdoclet > > xjavadoc > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-mock > > 1.2.6 > > test > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-jdbc > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-web > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > > > neither works. > > > > > > > > required artifacts missing: > > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload > > > > > them soon. > > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's > > > > > > groupId, > > > > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > > > > > > warning: > > > > > > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > > > > Downloading: > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > Downloading: > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > > > > > > files. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
I'm guessing this change will synch up with ibiblio in the next couple of hours? spring-mock was fixed a couple of days ago - so if you included "spring", then spring-mock didn't try to download spring-web and spring-jdbc. The current (new) pom for spring-mock requires exclusion of these artifacts. org.springframework spring-mock 1.2.6 test org.springframework spring-jdbc org.springframework spring-web Or maybe spring-jdbc and spring-web need to be fixed so they don't download everything they compile against. I know this is the point of transitive dependencies, but Spring is a strange beast in that it compiles against many libraries, but it doesn't require any of them to run. Matt On 12/21/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is > the last change for spring 1.2.6. > > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now > > > that they are maven tries to download them. > > > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that > > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the > > only thing you need to run Spring. > > > > > > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything > > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency > > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. > > > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I > > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I > > have to have a bunch to get the same results. > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring > > 1.2.6 > > > > > > aopalliance > > aopalliance > > > > > > com.servlets > > cos > > > > > > quartz > > quartz > > > > > > xdoclet > > xjavadoc > > > > > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-mock > > 1.2.6 > > test > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-jdbc > > > > > > org.springframework > > spring-web > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > > > neither works. > > > > > > > > required artifacts missing: > > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload > > > > > them soon. > > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's > > > > > > groupId, > > > > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > > > > > > warning: > > > > > > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > > > > Downloading: > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > Downloading: > > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > > > > > > files. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, >
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
I've put everything but commons-logging as optional. I think this is the last change for spring 1.2.6. On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now > > that they are maven tries to download them. > > The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that > everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the > only thing you need to run Spring. > > > > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything > > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency > > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. > > It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I > didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I > have to have a bunch to get the same results. > > > org.springframework > spring > 1.2.6 > > > aopalliance > aopalliance > > > com.servlets > cos > > > quartz > quartz > > > xdoclet > xjavadoc > > > > > org.springframework > spring-mock > 1.2.6 > test > > > org.springframework > spring-jdbc > > > org.springframework > spring-web > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > Matt > > > > > Regards > > > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > > neither works. > > > > > > required artifacts missing: > > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload > > > > them soon. > > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, > > > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > > > > > warning: > > > > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > > > Downloading: > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > > /maven2) > > > > > Downloading: > > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > > > > > files. > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
On 12/20/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now > that they are maven tries to download them. The previous poms had dependencies listed as well, except that everything was marked optional (true) since commons-logging is the only thing you need to run Spring. > > I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything > should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency > features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. It appears like there's still a few issues. Yesterday (Monday), I didn't need to have any exclusions on my Spring dependencies. Now I have to have a bunch to get the same results. org.springframework spring 1.2.6 aopalliance aopalliance com.servlets cos quartz quartz xdoclet xjavadoc org.springframework spring-mock 1.2.6 test org.springframework spring-jdbc org.springframework spring-web Thanks for your help. Matt > > Regards > > On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > neither works. > > > > required artifacts missing: > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > Matt > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them > > > soon. > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, > > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > > > > warning: > > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > > Downloading: > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > /maven2) > > > > Downloading: > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > > > > files. > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Hi, Probably it worked because there were no dependencies in them, now that they are maven tries to download them. I'm putting them as optional in the spring pom (almost everything should be), but you'll miss a lot of the transitive dependency features. That's why I really encourage the use of the smaller jars. Regards On 12/20/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > neither works. > > required artifacts missing: > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > Matt > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them > > soon. > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > Regards > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > > > warning: > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > Downloading: > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > /maven2) > > > Downloading: > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > /maven2) > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > > > files. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
I've been reminded that this is exactly the problem - these are supposed to be optional. Sorry! - Brett On 12/21/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't this just because those artifacts are not in your local > repository and must be installed manually? > > They were possibly installed under the other groupIds previously. > > - Brett > > On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > > neither works. > > > > required artifacts missing: > > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > > > Matt > > > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them > > > soon. > > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, > > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > > > > warning: > > > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > > Downloading: > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > /maven2) > > > > Downloading: > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > > /maven2) > > > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > > > > files. > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Isn't this just because those artifacts are not in your local repository and must be installed manually? They were possibly installed under the other groupIds previously. - Brett On 12/21/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using > springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now > neither works. > > required artifacts missing: > javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 > javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B > javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 > javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 > > Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? > > Matt > > On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them > > soon. > > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > > > Regards > > > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, > > > rather than "springframework". > > > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > > > warning: > > > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > > Downloading: > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > /maven2) > > > Downloading: > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > > /maven2) > > > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > > > files. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Unfortunately, this change seems to have hosed everything. Using springframework/spring was working *beautifully* before, and now neither works. required artifacts missing: javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.2 javax.transaction:jta:jar:1.0.1B javax.resource:connector:jar:1.0 javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2 Is it possible to revert things back to what they were? Matt On 12/19/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon. > The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the > poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the > org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. > > Regards > > On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, > > rather than "springframework". > > > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > > warning: > > > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > > Downloading: > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > /maven2) > > Downloading: > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > > ng-1.2.6.pom > > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > > (http://repo1.maven.org > > /maven2) > > > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > > files. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
Hi, I have the poms for org.springframework 1.2.6 ready and will upload them soon. The messages you get on springframwork are just warnings because the poms don't yet exist, but should work the same as the org.springframework ones that have minimalistic poms. Regards On 12/19/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven > Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, > rather than "springframework". > > If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the > groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following > warning: > > [INFO] [resources:resources] > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. > Downloading: > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 > /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > (http://repo1.maven.org > /maven2) > Downloading: > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri > ng-1.2.6.pom > [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central > (http://repo1.maven.org > /maven2) > > If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any > warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as > springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom > files. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Matt > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
file an issue (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV). jar is in correct directory but pom is missing. Emmanuel Matt Raible a écrit : I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, rather than "springframework". If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following warning: [INFO] [resources:resources] [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org /maven2) Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri ng-1.2.6.pom [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org /maven2) If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom files. Any ideas? Thanks, Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
groupId springframework vs. org.springframework
I like to follow best practices, and it appears that you (the Maven Team) would prefer we use "org.springframework" for Spring's groupId, rather than "springframework". If I change my pom.xml setting to use "org.springframework" for the groupId (for spring and spring-mock (v 1.2.6)), I get the following warning: [INFO] [resources:resources] [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources. Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring-mock/1.2.6 /spring-mock-1.2.6.pom [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org /maven2) Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/springframework/spring/1.2.6/spri ng-1.2.6.pom [WARNING] Unable to get resource from repository central (http://repo1.maven.org /maven2) If I change my groupId to be "springframework", I don't get any warnings. It seems like org.springframework is not as up-to-date as springframework, especially since its directories are missing *.pom files. Any ideas? Thanks, Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
