Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
You're talking about http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWAR-32 On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What I'm looking for is the ability to have a WAR that can act like a JAR. That is, any projects that depend on the WAR will inherit its dependencies. The current system basically requires me to publish a WAR w/o any dependencies and then make end-users projects include both a JAR and a WAR. If I was able to use a WAR as a JAR, and inherit all its dependencies, I could test and publish the WAR for download - and somehow exclude WEB-INF/lib from publishing/downloading. The dependencies would then be downloaded in the normal Maven way. As it stands, my understanding is its best to create the following: 1. JAR project that contains all the dependencies 2. WAR project that contains no dependencies, just static files 3. WAR project to test including both #1 and #2 since #2 can't really be tested since it has no dependencies. Is this the current recommended way to do this? While the transition to Maven 2 might be easier to end users, using the setup above seems like it might be a lot more complicated for folks hoping to contribute to AppFuse. Thanks, Matt On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > right, I though that was what you requested, but I see now it's not > > On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up > > the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib? > > > > I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so > > including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve > > the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c > > you won't get access to them anyway)? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Something like > > > > > > > > > maven-war-plugin > > > 2.0.2-20060829.202242-1 > > > > > > true > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > apache.org > > > Apache Snapshot Repository > > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository > > > > > > false > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded > > > > > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in > > > > > > > > my IDE. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty > > > > > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war > > > > > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace > > > > > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy > > > > > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas > > > > > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it > > > > > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers > > > > > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control. > > > > > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, > > > > > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed > > > > > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use > > > > > > > > war:inplace. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place > > > > > > > > is a good one? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appfuse2 > > > > > > > > - data > > > > > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces) > > > > > > > > - hibernate > > > > > > > > - ibatis > > > > > > > > - service > > > > > > > > - web > > > > > > > > - common > > > > > > > > - common-war > > > > > > > > - jsf > > > > > > > > - jsf-war > > > > > > > > - spring > > > > > > > > - spring-war > > > > > > > > - struts > > > > > > > > - struts-war > > > > > > > > - tapestry > > > > > > > > - tapestry-war > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems i
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
What I'm looking for is the ability to have a WAR that can act like a JAR. That is, any projects that depend on the WAR will inherit its dependencies. The current system basically requires me to publish a WAR w/o any dependencies and then make end-users projects include both a JAR and a WAR. If I was able to use a WAR as a JAR, and inherit all its dependencies, I could test and publish the WAR for download - and somehow exclude WEB-INF/lib from publishing/downloading. The dependencies would then be downloaded in the normal Maven way. As it stands, my understanding is its best to create the following: 1. JAR project that contains all the dependencies 2. WAR project that contains no dependencies, just static files 3. WAR project to test including both #1 and #2 since #2 can't really be tested since it has no dependencies. Is this the current recommended way to do this? While the transition to Maven 2 might be easier to end users, using the setup above seems like it might be a lot more complicated for folks hoping to contribute to AppFuse. Thanks, Matt On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: right, I though that was what you requested, but I see now it's not On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up > the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib? > > I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so > including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve > the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c > you won't get access to them anyway)? > > Thanks, > > Matt > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Something like > > > > > > maven-war-plugin > > 2.0.2-20060829.202242-1 > > > > true > > > > > > > > > > > > > > apache.org > > Apache Snapshot Repository > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository > > > > false > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded > > > > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in > > > > > > > my IDE. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty > > > > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war > > > > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace > > > > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars. > > > > > > > > > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy > > > > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas > > > > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it > > > > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers > > > > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control. > > > > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, > > > > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed > > > > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use > > > > > > > war:inplace. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place > > > > > > > is a good one? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > appfuse2 > > > > > > > - data > > > > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces) > > > > > > > - hibernate > > > > > > > - ibatis > > > > > > > - service > > > > > > > - web > > > > > > > - common > > > > > > > - common-war > > > > > > > - jsf > > > > > > > - jsf-war > > > > > > > - spring > > > > > > > - spring-war > > > > > > > - struts > > > > > > > - struts-war > > > > > > > - tapestry > > > > > > > - tapestry-war > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's > > > > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with > > > > > > > the war-overlay feature. > > > > > > > > > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a > > > > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes. > > > >
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
right, I though that was what you requested, but I see now it's not On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib? I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c you won't get access to them anyway)? Thanks, Matt On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something like > > > maven-war-plugin > 2.0.2-20060829.202242-1 > > true > > > > > > > apache.org > Apache Snapshot Repository > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository > > false > > > > > > On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded > > > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in > > > > > > my IDE. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty > > > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war > > > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace > > > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars. > > > > > > > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy > > > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas > > > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. > > > > > > > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it > > > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers > > > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control. > > > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, > > > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed > > > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use > > > > > > war:inplace. > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place > > > > > > is a good one? > > > > > > > > > > > > appfuse2 > > > > > > - data > > > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces) > > > > > > - hibernate > > > > > > - ibatis > > > > > > - service > > > > > > - web > > > > > > - common > > > > > > - common-war > > > > > > - jsf > > > > > > - jsf-war > > > > > > - spring > > > > > > - spring-war > > > > > > - struts > > > > > > - struts-war > > > > > > - tapestry > > > > > > - tapestry-war > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's > > > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with > > > > > > the war-overlay feature. > > > > > > > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a > > > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes. > > > > > > > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR > > > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like > > > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the > > > > patch myself. > > > > > > > > > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn > > > > Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about > > checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this > > documented somewhere? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't > > > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there > > > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different > > > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war > > > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a > > > > > > > > bunch
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like this plugin merely JARs up the classes and puts them into WEB-INF/lib? I'm guessing it doesn't make the WAR dependency type any smarter, so including a WAR gives you access to it's dependencies? Does it solve the problem where a WAR dependency should have no dependencies (b/c you won't get access to them anyway)? Thanks, Matt On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Something like maven-war-plugin 2.0.2-20060829.202242-1 true apache.org Apache Snapshot Repository http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository false On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded > > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in > > > > > my IDE. > > > > > > > > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty > > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war > > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace > > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars. > > > > > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy > > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas > > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. > > > > > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it > > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers > > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control. > > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, > > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed > > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use > > > > > war:inplace. > > > > > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place > > > > > is a good one? > > > > > > > > > > appfuse2 > > > > > - data > > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces) > > > > > - hibernate > > > > > - ibatis > > > > > - service > > > > > - web > > > > > - common > > > > > - common-war > > > > > - jsf > > > > > - jsf-war > > > > > - spring > > > > > - spring-war > > > > > - struts > > > > > - struts-war > > > > > - tapestry > > > > > - tapestry-war > > > > > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's > > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with > > > > > the war-overlay feature. > > > > > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a > > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes. > > > > > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR > > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like > > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the > > > patch myself. > > > > > > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn > > Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about > checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this > documented somewhere? > > Thanks, > > Matt > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't > > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there > > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different > > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war > > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a > > > > > > > bunch of files in it by default. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
Something like maven-war-plugin 2.0.2-20060829.202242-1 true apache.org Apache Snapshot Repository http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository false On 8/29/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run > > > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded > > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in > > > > my IDE. > > > > > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty > > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war > > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace > > > jetty:run when overlaying wars. > > > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy > > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. > > > > > > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas > > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. > > > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it > > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers > > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control. > > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, > > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed > > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use > > > > war:inplace. > > > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place > > > > is a good one? > > > > > > > > appfuse2 > > > > - data > > > > - common (model objects, interfaces) > > > > - hibernate > > > > - ibatis > > > > - service > > > > - web > > > > - common > > > > - common-war > > > > - jsf > > > > - jsf-war > > > > - spring > > > > - spring-war > > > > - struts > > > > - struts-war > > > > - tapestry > > > > - tapestry-war > > > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's > > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with > > > > the war-overlay feature. > > > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a > > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes. > > > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR > > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like > > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the > > patch myself. > > > The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this documented somewhere? Thanks, Matt > > > > > Matt > > > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't > > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there > > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different > > > > > > (jetty) mailing list? > > > > > > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war > > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a > > > > > > bunch of files in it by default. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > > > > -- The Princess Bride > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > > -- The Princess Bride > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
On 8/29/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run > > > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded > > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in > > > my IDE. > > > > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty > > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war > > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace > > jetty:run when overlaying wars. > > > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy > > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. > > > > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas > > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. > > > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it > > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers > > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control. > > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, > > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed > > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use > > > war:inplace. > > > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place > > > is a good one? > > > > > > appfuse2 > > > - data > > > - common (model objects, interfaces) > > > - hibernate > > > - ibatis > > > - service > > > - web > > > - common > > > - common-war > > > - jsf > > > - jsf-war > > > - spring > > > - spring-war > > > - struts > > > - struts-war > > > - tapestry > > > - tapestry-war > > > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's > > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with > > > the war-overlay feature. > > > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a > > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes. > > Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR > project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like > to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the > patch myself. The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn Do you have a usage example for this option? How would I got about checking this plugin out from svn and installing it locally? Is this documented somewhere? Thanks, Matt > > Matt > > > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't > > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there > > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different > > > > > (jetty) mailing list? > > > > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war > > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a > > > > > bunch of files in it by default. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > > > -- The Princess Bride > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > -- The Princess Bride > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run > > > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded > > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in > > my IDE. > > > jetty6 was renamed to jetty > It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war > overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace > jetty:run when overlaying wars. > > jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy > the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. > > > > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas > > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. > > > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it > > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers > > often get confused when they go to check things into source control. > > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, > > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed > > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use > > war:inplace. > > > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place > > is a good one? > > > > appfuse2 > > - data > > - common (model objects, interfaces) > > - hibernate > > - ibatis > > - service > > - web > > - common > > - common-war > > - jsf > > - jsf-war > > - spring > > - spring-war > > - struts > > - struts-war > > - tapestry > > - tapestry-war > > > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's > > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with > > the war-overlay feature. > > looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a > jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes. Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the patch myself. The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn Matt > The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't > > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there > > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different > > > > (jetty) mailing list? > > > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war > > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a > > > > bunch of files in it by default. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > > -- The Princess Bride > > > > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run > > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in > my IDE. jetty6 was renamed to jetty It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace jetty:run when overlaying wars. jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. > > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. > > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers > often get confused when they go to check things into source control. > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use > war:inplace. > > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place > is a good one? > > appfuse2 > - data > - common (model objects, interfaces) > - hibernate > - ibatis > - service > - web > - common > - common-war > - jsf > - jsf-war > - spring > - spring-war > - struts > - struts-war > - tapestry > - tapestry-war > > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with > the war-overlay feature. looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes. Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the patch myself. Matt The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited. > > Thanks, > > Matt > > > > > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different > > > (jetty) mailing list? > > > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a > > > bunch of files in it by default. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > -- The Princess Bride > > > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in my IDE. jetty6 was renamed to jetty It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace jetty:run when overlaying wars. jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough. Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers often get confused when they go to check things into source control. If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use war:inplace. Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place is a good one? appfuse2 - data - common (model objects, interfaces) - hibernate - ibatis - service - web - common - common-war - jsf - jsf-war - spring - spring-war - struts - struts-war - tapestry - tapestry-war I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with the war-overlay feature. looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes. The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited. Thanks, Matt > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different > > (jetty) mailing list? > > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a > > bunch of files in it by default. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in my IDE. Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project. I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers often get confused when they go to check things into source control. If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However, in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use war:inplace. Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place is a good one? appfuse2 - data - common (model objects, interfaces) - hibernate - ibatis - service - web - common - common-war - jsf - jsf-war - spring - spring-war - struts - struts-war - tapestry - tapestry-war I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with the war-overlay feature. Thanks, Matt On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different > (jetty) mailing list? > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a > bunch of files in it by default. > > Thanks, > > Matt > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different (jetty) mailing list? Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a bunch of files in it by default. Thanks, Matt http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maven-overlay and jetty6 plugin
While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different (jetty) mailing list? Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a bunch of files in it by default. Thanks, Matt http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
