Re: MINA support for WebSockets?
Thanks Emmanuelshould be help on our side F Il giorno 05/set/2013 06:36, "Emmanuel Lécharny" ha scritto: > Le 9/5/13 2:53 AM, Jon a écrit : > > I am not the person to ask regarding Mina's future plans. Emmanuel? > > > I'm afraid we just drop that ball one year ago :/ > > The JIRA containing the submission > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-907) is still around, and > has to be added to the code base. > > Our bad... > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > >
Re: MINA support for WebSockets?
I'm glad then to have brought it to your attention. :-) The JIRA submission is buggy, I've been playing with it and fixing things. I'm not competent enough with the MINA environment to fix all the problems on my own, but will be happy to work with whoever takes it on. I can send you a private message with details or drop a note to the dev list. Thanks much! --Mark On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 9/5/13 2:53 AM, Jon a écrit : >> I am not the person to ask regarding Mina's future plans. Emmanuel? > > > I'm afraid we just drop that ball one year ago :/ > > The JIRA containing the submission > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-907) is still around, and > has to be added to the code base. > > Our bad... > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com >
Re: MINA support for WebSockets?
Le 9/5/13 2:53 AM, Jon a écrit : > I am not the person to ask regarding Mina's future plans. Emmanuel? I'm afraid we just drop that ball one year ago :/ The JIRA containing the submission (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-907) is still around, and has to be added to the code base. Our bad... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
Re: MINA support for WebSockets?
I am not the person to ask regarding Mina's future plans. Emmanuel? WebSocket starts with an http request and performs an upgrade command. After that it is just a minimal frame data. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > HTTP's not my interest. Almost identically to Dhruv's messages in the > archived exchange from last year, I want a WebSocket filter which will > process the connect handshake, then be invisible, so that existing MINA-based > servers can handle WebSocket clients without other modification. So my > questions are, what's the status of the code which Dhruv contributed 12 > months ago? Is that going to become part of a future release? Are we free > to use it? Does the MINA roadmap include that code, or has that code been > abandoned? Is there some other plan for WS support on the horizon? > > --Mark > > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Jon V. wrote: > >> The http implementation hasn't received any love lately as far as I know. >> It is not for needing a bit of work. Why not take the code and integrate it >> yourself? WebSockets are not terribly complicated. >> On Sep 4, 2013 11:36 AM, "Mark Phillips" wrote: >> >>> The Users and Dev list archives contain year-old exchanges with Dhruv >>> Chopra of ShepHertz in which the ShepHertz company offers to donate >>> WebSocket protocol filters to MINA. I see that code in the developers' >>> JIRA. But that exchange seems to have ended after just a few messages, and >>> it doesn't look like the donated code has subsequently been integrated into >>> a release. What are MINA's plans to support WebSockets? I think it's >>> clear that ability to add WebSockets IO to existing MINA-based server apps >>> is attractive for many users. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> --Mark >
Re: MINA support for WebSockets?
HTTP's not my interest. Almost identically to Dhruv's messages in the archived exchange from last year, I want a WebSocket filter which will process the connect handshake, then be invisible, so that existing MINA-based servers can handle WebSocket clients without other modification. So my questions are, what's the status of the code which Dhruv contributed 12 months ago? Is that going to become part of a future release? Are we free to use it? Does the MINA roadmap include that code, or has that code been abandoned? Is there some other plan for WS support on the horizon? --Mark On Sep 4, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Jon V. wrote: > The http implementation hasn't received any love lately as far as I know. > It is not for needing a bit of work. Why not take the code and integrate it > yourself? WebSockets are not terribly complicated. > On Sep 4, 2013 11:36 AM, "Mark Phillips" wrote: > >> The Users and Dev list archives contain year-old exchanges with Dhruv >> Chopra of ShepHertz in which the ShepHertz company offers to donate >> WebSocket protocol filters to MINA. I see that code in the developers' >> JIRA. But that exchange seems to have ended after just a few messages, and >> it doesn't look like the donated code has subsequently been integrated into >> a release. What are MINA's plans to support WebSockets? I think it's >> clear that ability to add WebSockets IO to existing MINA-based server apps >> is attractive for many users. >> >> Thanks! >> >> --Mark
Re: MINA support for WebSockets?
The http implementation hasn't received any love lately as far as I know. It is not for needing a bit of work. Why not take the code and integrate it yourself? WebSockets are not terribly complicated. On Sep 4, 2013 11:36 AM, "Mark Phillips" wrote: > The Users and Dev list archives contain year-old exchanges with Dhruv > Chopra of ShepHertz in which the ShepHertz company offers to donate > WebSocket protocol filters to MINA. I see that code in the developers' > JIRA. But that exchange seems to have ended after just a few messages, and > it doesn't look like the donated code has subsequently been integrated into > a release. What are MINA's plans to support WebSockets? I think it's > clear that ability to add WebSockets IO to existing MINA-based server apps > is attractive for many users. > > Thanks! > > --Mark
