RE: [E] unsubscribe????
Every users@openoffice.apache.org email has this... To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org -Original Message- From: Robert William Allen [mailto:ballen.flem...@yahoo.ca.INVALID] Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 3:00 PM To: Open Office Help Subject: [E] unsubscribe Folks….my problem has been corrected and I feel that I do not need to continue with this chat line. How do I UNSUBSCRIBE Thanks. Bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Subscription
You do know that you can download and install this for free. Kill that subscription thing and get it directly from; https://www.openoffice.org/. As for the charges you are incurring, I have no idea who is charging you. It isn't 'official'. -Original Message- From: Logan Hamm [mailto:loganhamm1...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 1:40 PM To: users@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Subscription I have open office on my laptop because my stepfather downloaded it on my laptop around August 2015. I renewed it one time a couple months ago for $10 and did not do it again. For some reason I have been charged $10.69 twice this month and I am not sure why. I would appreciate your help on this matter thank you. Logan Hamm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Top posting
> -Original Message- > From: William K Helbig Jr [mailto:whel...@windstream.net] > > A quick lesson on top posting. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style I've been doing the newsgroups, forums and email in its various formats for close to 30 years. The whole top/bottom posting issue is just plain BS. Particularly when the thread is long with folks responding to different parts of the post at different times. What's important is to write clearly and concisely. Don't make me work to understand what you are saying. As for personal preference, I prefer midposting. > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Not for me. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. The most annoying is flame wars. Especially over trivial things like, how to post. >> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: HELP!!!
> -Original Message- > From: James Plante [mailto:jimpla...@me.com] > 4. Virtual users are controlled by an Artificial Stupidity System; don't > listen to them. > 5. Please tell us what problem you're having, and maybe the rest of us can > help. > How does one tell the difference? And if you are a virtual user, how can we trust your answer? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: licenses
> -Original Message- > From: Rolando Palacios [mailto:rpalac...@univesco.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:32 PM > To: users@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: licenses > > How do we obtain 160 licenses? > > Rolando Palacios > > 972-836-8008 > > rpalac...@univesco.com > > You download the software and install it on 160 machines. It is open source and free. Just be sure to go to the right site; https://www.openoffice.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: newest version download deleted my files
> -Original Message- > From: Jane Parmer [mailto:jjpar...@msn.com] > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:47 AM > To: users@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: newest version download deleted my files > > I downloaded the 4.0 as it was offered and it deleted all my files from my 3.4 > open office org. those are important documents and I cant believe it did this. > how do I get them back? I tried repairing the download but nothing is > working..help,,, > What OS is this on? What backup protocol do you have in place? Where do you save your docs? I just hope you don't use that 'c:\users' area. --- List Conduct Guidelines: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
I'll give it a try. Mike, Try this... To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org I usually put unsubscribe in the subject line out of habit. > -Original Message- > From: MIKE LISH [mailto:emell...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 1:38 PM > To: users@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) > > I keep being told I'm using the wrong address, so what do I need to do? > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Mail Delivery Subsystem > Date: 25 September 2013 20:27 > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) > To: emell...@gmail.com > > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > gmail@openoffice.apache.org > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for > the recipient domain openoffice.apache.org by mx1.eu.apache.org. > [192.87.106.230]. > > The error that the other server returned was: > 550 mail to gmail@openoffice.apache.org not accepted here > > - Original message - > > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=gmail.com; s=20120113; > h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; > bh=81qj+TO8oGGMESKXEZx4KnCCqb3t5olkIyFF2LtZY9o=; > b=QFDPcYKZ2uF/vmNH39v2Xv41EqEp4Kqr65sWiJQa4VzV3lr5iNrmBVycP/9b7tX4UP > > MTvxo9zVYt0IzIgTldLBkMRmz5tU3qwFpCNzaF4QmZ3LI2uxfVZT0ARkmmObWtzBbH/E > > QtdG3moJW/3vepba6CiDQKG3CP8p+bSE3/D2ivLfU7/fvFwDW4xGxSBjVDHbW7uPKwtH > > TUN9Dr1NAAIubc5zz5aPAygDlJLxTE2zZbJTlePC0DYYRxhlRNtlMw+zaxzRCvLOWYDG > > dM8wQGQtPu/4qh6fAeCP/UMZA9VC6+JTs6SySLDmsEiibZokMlIIZqCuvjqsJKLcY/WI > x/+A== > X-Received: by 10.15.35.196 with SMTP id g44mr57898994eev.18.1380137220707; > Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:27:00 -0700 (PDT) > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Received: by 10.15.63.193 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:26:30 -0700 (PDT) > From: MIKE LISH > Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:26:30 +0100 > Message-ID: < > cafqz85n9xzhepv1xsxjzklij6+tshoh01uuatkg33a381ah...@mail.gmail.com> > Subject: unsubscribe > To: gmail@openoffice.apache.org > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c1a0c83bfa04e73a3c8a > > Please unsubscribe me > > Regards, > > Mike Lish - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: Open Office in Swedish
> -Original Message- > From: M Henri Day [mailto:mhenri...@gmail.com] > > > > Agree - but the responsibility for the forking should be placed squarely > where it lies - on Oracle. Moreover, the forked paths would have > automatically rejoined had Oracle, when it decided to dump OOo, chosen to > assign it to the Document Foundation, which was already up and running and > which requested that this be done. Instead, the firm decided to assign all > the rights to Apache, in the knowledge that doing so would perpetuate the > fork. Thank you, Mr Ellison > Apache is open source as well. So, I don't buy that argument. Oracle bought Sun and acquired OpenOffice. To an outsider, namely me and one that is not vested in either side, it appears that someone didn't like the notion that Oracle was in control of OO and decided to fork it. For giggles sake, let's say that it was not a good thing to have OO in the hands of Oracle. Once OO was out of Oracle's control and in the hands of Apache, LO should have simply disappeared with the LO developers flocking back to OO bringing with them the new ideas they built into LO. Oh, and of course, the squandered resources could be put to better use; building a solid, open source Office Suite.
RE: Open Office in Swedish
> From: M Henri Day [mailto:mhenri...@gmail.com] > > 2012/11/28 Johnny Rosenberg > > > Unfortunately it seems like most of the Swedish translators moved to > > LibreOffice, which is a shame, because LibreOffice is crap these days. > > For every new feature they introduce a dozen of bugs which will never > > be corrected. Something like that, anyway. I was planning to go back > > to OpenOffice, but I'd like to have it in Swedish, so maybe not… :( > > > > The above statement to the effect that «LibreOffice is crap these days» > does not at all correspond to my experience ; quite the contrary > > Henri It is truly a shame that there had to be this fork. The 'eyes' have been effectively cut in half between the two products. And for what, minor differences? Is one product really so much better than the other? Yeah, I see the differences, but they are less than between versions of MS Office.
