Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Winfried de Heiden]

  
  
Hi all,

What I like:


  It´s open!
  both "thin" oVirt node and "fat" Linux+VDSM.
  Browser based GUI, Firefox supported.
  Spice console works just fine!

What I really would like to include in the coming releases:


  Option to resize disk in user interface and CLI.
  
  Import, upload, raw and qcow2 images from the web gui and CLI.
Importing VMDK (vmWare) would be nice as well.
  Upload ISO from the web gui.
  What about exporting raw and qcow2 images (and convert to
vmdk)...
  
  Option to disable "This Browser version isn't optimal for
displaying the application". Ater 10 times it gets anoying.
  
  Better recovery for the ISO and export domains. Currently, if
I keep my export domain  connected a crashing server might cause
problems. After creating a new server en reconnecting the old
export or iso domain, it will say "it is allready connected to
another domain". The export domain is such a nice way to backup
important templates and virtual machines :)
  
  Multiple ISO domains.
  Both export and ISO domains on local storage, iSCSI, CIFS etc.

Looking forward to the new release!

Winfried

Op 03-01-13 17:08, Itamar Heim schreef:

Hi
  Everyone,
  
  
  as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what
  they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
  improved/added in coming versions?
  
  
  Thanks,
  
     Itamar
  
  ___
  
  Users mailing list
  
  Users@ovirt.org
  
  http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  


  

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Testing gluster in 3.2 nightlies

[noc]

On 4-1-2013 7:03, Kanagaraj wrote:

On Friday 04 January 2013 02:12 AM, Joop wrote:
Just saw the question what route to follow for post 3.2 and picked up 
something that I didn't know about was going to ask if it was 
possible to implement, namely setting permissions on the volume 
folder when creating a gluster volume.
But when trying it out I found a little snag. I installed two hosts 
with a minimal fed17 install, added a couple of repos to enable 
installing the latest nightlies (it needed a later then 0.9 libvirt 
(0.10 from danken) and qemu-kvm and since a couple of days a later 
gluster which outputs in xml (gluster-3.4..)

Steps:
- start with a clean engine-setup
- in the webui, set the cluster to 3.2 and virt+gluster, set the DC 
to 3.2/NFS

- add the two hosts, went OK.
- add a Volume, gluster-data, gets created OK, BUT the Create Volume 
'popup window' never stops spinning its busy cursor :-(
Looking at the logs I see that the volume is created, st01 is used, 
st02 gets the message, creation is returning Succes but it looks like 
the global lock is never released.
We have an issue with locking while creating a volume, fix for this is 
currently under review.

http://gerrit.ovirt.org/10448
I still might have the vdsm logs or else I can replay it to generate 
them, but if it really is this issue then it they might not be needed.

Is the workaround I used a viable one? (restarting ovirt-engine)

Joop

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] ISO path is not empty

[Mohsen Saeedi]

  
  
Hi
  I have a problem with Ovirt engine-setup. when i run it and in the setup
process then it checks the ISO local path
  and print a error:
  directory /ISO is not empty
I make a new partition
and make ext4 filesystem and
  the i mount it under /ISO. we know it has a lost+found directory. i
think it should be fixed in
newer version. 
Thanks.
  
  

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Johan Kragsterman]

Hi!There are many promising features in oVirt, but still I feel it is just "promising", not for production. The most critical issue for me, that is preventing me from using oVirt in production, is the "single point of failure" of the engine. I wouldn't want the struggle of setting up a new engine, and all the hazards that brings, in a production environment, in the case of an engine failureSo, some sort of clustered engine, or master/slave, or whatever can solve this situation.Perhaps one of the reasons this is difficult is because of the integration of both admin portal and user portal? Then I believe it was a mistake to combine them, and that it would be better to split them.Rgrds JohanOp 03-01-13 17:08, Itamar Heim schreef:

Hi
  Everyone,
  
  
  as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what
  they find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
  improved/added in coming versions?
  
  
  Thanks,
  
     Itamar
  
  ___
  
  Users mailing list
  
  Users@ovirt.org
  
  http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
  


  

___Users mailing listUsers@ovirt.orghttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Alex Leonhardt]

+1 this :) ... I use dreyou's packages too ...

also - ovirt/rhev agent for centos 5.8 would be a nice to have :)


2013/1/3 Patrick Hurrelmann 

> On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> > find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
> > improved/added in coming versions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Itamar
>
> For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to
> the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages.
>
> But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit
> whets my appetite) :)
>
> Regards
> Patrick
>
> --
> Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg
>
> HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München
> Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Alex Leonhardt]

Easier import of existing Nodes back into a new oVirt Engine would be great
- it's a complete mess at the moment (if one doesnt have a backup) - I'm
looking at this from VMware users point of view, with them, all you need to
do is point it at a server and it'll  import everything that's already
there - oVirt should have the same capabilities / with some confirmation
screens that it belongs to another storage domain, etc. etc. and if one
wants to force it, but it should still be possible ...


Alex


2013/1/4 Alex Leonhardt 

> +1 this :) ... I use dreyou's packages too ...
>
> also - ovirt/rhev agent for centos 5.8 would be a nice to have :)
>
>
> 2013/1/3 Patrick Hurrelmann 
>
>> On 03.01.2013 17:08, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> > Hi Everyone,
>> >
>> > as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
>> > find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
>> > improved/added in coming versions?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Itamar
>>
>> For me, I'd like to see official rpms for RHEL6/CentOS6. According to
>> the traffic on this list quite a lot are using Dreyou's packages.
>>
>> But I'm really looking forward to oVirt 3.2 (reading all those commit
>> whets my appetite) :)
>>
>> Regards
>> Patrick
>>
>> --
>> Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg
>>
>> HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München
>> Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich
>> ___
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] node loses contact with rhev agent

[Vinzenz Feenstra]

Hi,

On 01/03/2013 08:53 PM, Jonathan Horne wrote:
i have 2 nodes now that have both lost contact with the rhev agents on 
guest VMs.  if i migrate the guest to another node, the IP address and 
memory usage immediately show up.  migrate a guest back, and the 
IP/memory info disappears.


how can i troubleshoot what is causing this?


It'd be nice if you could send me the logs from /var/log/vdsm/vdsm* 
which are on the node where it looses the contact. I am currently trying 
to find exactly the cause of such an issue as well and it would be 
helpful if we could be provided with log files. Currently I am still 
lacking them.

I will check them and let you know what I will be able to find.

If you wouldn't mind I would be referring to you for more questions if 
some will come up during the search for the cause and I will let you 
know the results asap.


thanks,
jonathan



--
Regards,

Vinzenz Feenstra | Senior Software Engineer
RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
Phone: +420 532 294 625
IRC: vfeenstr or evilissimo

Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Testing gluster in 3.2 nightlies

[Kanagaraj]

On Friday 04 January 2013 02:15 PM, noc wrote:

On 4-1-2013 7:03, Kanagaraj wrote:

On Friday 04 January 2013 02:12 AM, Joop wrote:
Just saw the question what route to follow for post 3.2 and picked 
up something that I didn't know about was going to ask if it was 
possible to implement, namely setting permissions on the volume 
folder when creating a gluster volume.
But when trying it out I found a little snag. I installed two hosts 
with a minimal fed17 install, added a couple of repos to enable 
installing the latest nightlies (it needed a later then 0.9 libvirt 
(0.10 from danken) and qemu-kvm and since a couple of days a later 
gluster which outputs in xml (gluster-3.4..)

Steps:
- start with a clean engine-setup
- in the webui, set the cluster to 3.2 and virt+gluster, set the DC 
to 3.2/NFS

- add the two hosts, went OK.
- add a Volume, gluster-data, gets created OK, BUT the Create Volume 
'popup window' never stops spinning its busy cursor :-(
Looking at the logs I see that the volume is created, st01 is used, 
st02 gets the message, creation is returning Succes but it looks 
like the global lock is never released.
We have an issue with locking while creating a volume, fix for this 
is currently under review.

http://gerrit.ovirt.org/10448
I still might have the vdsm logs or else I can replay it to generate 
them, but if it really is this issue then it they might not be needed.

Is the workaround I used a viable one? (restarting ovirt-engine)


We are waiting for the fix to be approved.

I can't think of any workaround for this now. After restarting also you 
will have the same issue while creating the next volume in the cluster. 
Other operations like start/stop/add-bricks will work after the restart.



Joop



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Tom Brown]

> - Original Message -
>> From: "Tom Brown" 
>> To: "users@oVirt.org" 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 7:47:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
>> 
>> I'd like to see a spice client for Mac - i know of various ports but
>> as of now on 10.8 i have to use VNC which is not ideal. I now spice
>> != ovirt however they are very linked at this time.
> 
> What do you mean? a client or a browser plugin?
> 

i suppose ideally both - a browser plugin would be great as then interaction 
between the GUI and the console would be seamless with the ability to use a 
standalone client if it were required.

thanks

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] ISO import issue

[Tom Brown]

Hi

I have in the past imported iso's without issue however since returning from 
the holiday break i tried today and got this

[root@ovirt-manager ~]# engine-iso-uploader -v -i iso upload openfiler.iso 
Please provide the REST API password for the admin@internal oVirt Engine user 
(CTRL+D to abort): 
ERROR: [ERROR]::ca_file (CA certificate) must be specified for SSL connection.
INFO: Use the -h option to see usage.
DEBUG: Configuration:
DEBUG: command: upload
DEBUG: Traceback (most recent call last):
DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 931, in 
DEBUG: isoup = ISOUploader(conf)
DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 333, in __init__
DEBUG: self.upload_to_storage_domain()
DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 677, in 
upload_to_storage_domain
DEBUG: (id, address, path) = 
self.get_host_and_path_from_ISO_domain(self.configuration.get('iso_domain'))
DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 424, in 
get_host_and_path_from_ISO_domain
DEBUG: if not self._initialize_api():
DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 358, in _initialize_api
DEBUG: password=self.configuration.get("passwd"))
DEBUG:   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk/api.py", line 78, in 
__init__
DEBUG: debug=debug
DEBUG:   File 
"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/connectionspool.py", 
line 47, in __init__
DEBUG: debug=debug))
DEBUG:   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk/web/connection.py", 
line 38, in __init__
DEBUG: timeout=timeout)
DEBUG:   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk/web/connection.py", 
line 102, in __createConnection
DEBUG: raise NoCertificatesError
DEBUG: NoCertificatesError: [ERROR]::ca_file (CA certificate) must be specified 
for SSL connection.

Nothing has changed from my side so i wonder if there are any ideas as to why 
this has just started happening ?

thanks

[root@ovirt-manager ovirt-engine]# rpm -qa | grep ovirt
ovirt-image-uploader-3.1.0-16.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-backend-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-setup-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-log-collector-3.1.0-16.el6.noarch
ovirt-iso-uploader-3.1.0-16.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-jbossas711-1-0.x86_64
ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-genericapi-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-config-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-sdk-3.2.0.2-1.el6.noarch
ovirt-release-el6-4-2.noarch
ovirt-engine-restapi-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-userportal-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-tools-common-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
ovirt-engine-cli-3.2.0.5-1.el6.noarch

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Koch (ovido)]

Hi,

First of all thanks for starting this discussion.

My feedback is mainly based on RHEV, as I'm using RHEV in our company
and on customer side. oVirt is cool as I can see what new features next
RHEV version may/will bring and what issues other users have with this
technology.

What I like:
* web based UI
* KVM as it brings the highest virtualization performance on the market
* RHEL/Fedora as a hypervisor for more flexibility
* tags and bookmarks with search filters - great for big installations
* server and desktop virtualization can be done with one gui
* open source of course ;)
* hook scripts - sooo cool!
* rest-api
* user portal - some of our customers use this as a basic cloud tool for
providing vms and self-provisioning features with accounting using
postgresql database

What I would like to see in future release in oVirt and after testing in
RHEV (most of these points are based on customer feedback, too, who
bought RHEV or where we had at least a pre-sales appointment):

* Spice-XPI for Firefox on Windows (and maybe Ubuntu):
I know it's a lot of work to build it for every new firefox version, but
providing it for Firefox LTS would be a really good start. At the moment
Internet Explorer ist required for full use of admin und user portal (or
VNC has to be used).

* ovirt-guest-agents for major Linux distributions:
- openSUSE
- SLES
- Ubuntu
- Debian

* Virtualize ovirt-engine on ovirt hosts
I know that this would require major changes due to how oVirt works
(libvirt and vdsm), but nearly every customers is asking: why can't I
install my hypervisors, create a vm for RHEV manager and configure the
environment then (in the same way as it is possible with VMware)?

* Make ovirt-engine more Enterprise ready
Compared with VMware (sorry for always comparing it with VMware, but
it's the market leader and it has many nice features which would be
great in oVirt/RHEV, too) oVirt required more tasks done on command line
or via API/Shell/GUI as features are missing in the web GUI:

- Deploy network configs on all hosts
When creating a new logical network in a Cluster it has to be created on
all hosts before it can be used. It would be great if this could be done
automatically (except for rhevm/spice/storage-networks where an IP
address of each host is required). The workflow could be:
+ create new logical network
+ click on deploy button
+ create ifcfg-files on hosts
+ make ifcfg-files persistent on ovirt Nodes
+ bring interface up
+ check if interfaces are up
+ make logical network Operational if deployment was successful on all
hosts

- Configure ovirt hosts from GUI
It would be really an improvement if all settings of the TUI (like DNS,
NTP, syslog, kdump, admin and root passwords, hostname,...) could be
configured in ovirt-engine gui, too (in hosts tab). Plus including
changing multipath.conf in Web GUI would be very nice.

- Create host profiles
Storing all configuration settings of the TUI and host tab (without ip
addresses for sure) in a profile would make changes easier and speed up
deployment of new hypervisors. I'm thinking of:
+ create a profile which contains e.g. DNS, NTP and admin passwords
+ link profile to hosts
+ change DNS in profile
+ in hosts tab you can see that there are changes between the profile
and the hosts
+ bring host in maintenance mode
+ sync profile (and maybe reboot host)
When installing new hosts (via CD or PXE) the profile can be used to
automatically configure the host without providing all settings via boot
options + configure all networks, custom multipath.conf,... Host profile
should be used for full RHEL/Fedora hosts as well.

- Update RHEL/Fedora Hypervisors from GUI
It would be nice if Fedora hosts could be updated from the ovirt-engine
GUI like the ovirt Node. Running yum check-update on host and displaying
notice if there are updates available.

- Implement resource pools
At the moment only Quotas are available (which is great, btw), but in
some cases it's necessary to implement resource pools. E.g. Limit CPU,
Memory and Network for group of test vms, but give full resources to
production vms. This could be done with cgroups.

- Clone vms
I'm missing the possibility of cloning vms without creating a template. 

- Resize disk in GUI
Increasing the size of a disk would help a lot. At the moment I create
new disks and put it into volume group on vm, but resizing would be
nicer in some cases and will reduce the number of disks.

- Upload ISOs within the GUI to ISO domain

- Integrate virt-v2v into oVirt GUI
It would be cool if VMs could be Migrated from other systems within the
GUI using virt-v2v as a backend.

- Edit settings of vms before importing them
Most the of the settings like disk type (IDE/VirtIO), nic but also vm
type (server/desktop) and access protocol (Spice/VNC) can't be edited
withing oVirt/RHEVM GUI before importing them. These settings can only
be changed by editing the xml directly. Disk type and nic is risky of
course, but working for most Linux distr

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Soeren Grunewald]

On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:

On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:

On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:

On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:

On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:

Hi Everyone,

as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
improved/added in coming versions?


A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and
Intel host machines.
KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors
are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different
hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration
should be possible.


can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration?



With offline  migration, I means the guest is not running while moving
it from one host to another.

I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and
the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same
cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and
another called Intel (for the xeon).
Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel
machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't.


I'm not aware that you can't.


Ok, now is see my problem.


you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the other.
yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue?



To move the guest I need to "edit" the guest and than I can change the 
cluster.


Thanks,
Soeren





I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition.
Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu
configuration "-cpu qemu32" or "-cpu qemu64".


Regards,
Soeren

[...]






___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] ISO import issue

[Tom Brown]

> 
> 
> 
> I have in the past imported iso's without issue however since returning from 
> the holiday break i tried today and got this
> 
> [root@ovirt-manager ~]# engine-iso-uploader -v -i iso upload openfiler.iso 
> Please provide the REST API password for the admin@internal oVirt Engine user 
> (CTRL+D to abort): 
> ERROR: [ERROR]::ca_file (CA certificate) must be specified for SSL connection.
> INFO: Use the -h option to see usage.
> DEBUG: Configuration:
> DEBUG: command: upload
> DEBUG: Traceback (most recent call last):
> DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 931, in 
> DEBUG: isoup = ISOUploader(conf)
> DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 333, in __init__
> DEBUG: self.upload_to_storage_domain()
> DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 677, in 
> upload_to_storage_domain
> DEBUG: (id, address, path) = 
> self.get_host_and_path_from_ISO_domain(self.configuration.get('iso_domain'))
> DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 424, in 
> get_host_and_path_from_ISO_domain
> DEBUG: if not self._initialize_api():
> DEBUG:   File "/usr/bin/engine-iso-uploader", line 358, in _initialize_api
> DEBUG: password=self.configuration.get("passwd"))
> DEBUG:   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk/api.py", line 78, in 
> __init__
> DEBUG: debug=debug
> DEBUG:   File 
> "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/connectionspool.py",
>  line 47, in __init__
> DEBUG: debug=debug))
> DEBUG:   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk/web/connection.py", 
> line 38, in __init__
> DEBUG: timeout=timeout)
> DEBUG:   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ovirtsdk/web/connection.py", 
> line 102, in __createConnection
> DEBUG: raise NoCertificatesError
> DEBUG: NoCertificatesError: [ERROR]::ca_file (CA certificate) must be 
> specified for SSL connection.
> 
> Nothing has changed from my side so i wonder if there are any ideas as to why 
> this has just started happening ?
> 
> thanks
> 
> [root@ovirt-manager ovirt-engine]# rpm -qa | grep ovirt
> ovirt-image-uploader-3.1.0-16.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-backend-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-setup-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-log-collector-3.1.0-16.el6.noarch
> ovirt-iso-uploader-3.1.0-16.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-jbossas711-1-0.x86_64
> ovirt-engine-dbscripts-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-genericapi-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-config-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-sdk-3.2.0.2-1.el6.noarch
> ovirt-release-el6-4-2.noarch
> ovirt-engine-restapi-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-userportal-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-tools-common-3.1.0-3.19.el6.noarch
> ovirt-engine-cli-3.2.0.5-1.el6.noarch
> 

solved - ovirt-engine-sdk mismatch issue, seems installing ovirt-engine-cli 
updated that package and i hadn't noticed

thanks

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Marcelo Barbosa]

Dear Itamar,

   My dreams for oVirt 3.2:

   1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent);
   2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
   3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and largest
world use;
   4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual
Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
   5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option;
   6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem
clusters, and more...) example:
https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev

   I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much higher ...

Thanks.

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald <
soeren.grunew...@avionic-design.de> wrote:

> On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>
 On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:

> On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
>> find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
>> improved/added in coming versions?
>>
>
> A nice feature would be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and
> Intel host machines.
> KVM should be able to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors
> are able/can to support this. Because oVirt aims to support different
> hypervisors it might be problematic. But I think offline migration
> should be possible.
>

 can you please elaborate what do you mean by offline migration?


>>> With offline  migration, I means the guest is not running while moving
>>> it from one host to another.
>>>
>>> I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on a AMD Opteron and
>>> the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both machines in the same
>>> cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for the opteron) and
>>> another called Intel (for the xeon).
>>> Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine to the Intel
>>> machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not aware that you can't.
>>
>
> Ok, now is see my problem.
>
>
>  you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the other.
>> yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue?
>>
>>
> To move the guest I need to "edit" the guest and than I can change the
> cluster.
>
> Thanks,
> Soeren
>
>
>
>>
>>> I assume the solution for this could be a generic cluster definition.
>>> Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to the qemu
>>> configuration "-cpu qemu32" or "-cpu qemu64".
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Soeren
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> __**_
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Koch (ovido)]

Hi Marcelo,

Regarding your 6. point:

I wrote a plugin for Icinga/Nagios to check RHEV 3.0 environment using
REST-API. At the moment there are 2 bugs (1 fixed in latest svn trunk, 1
open) to fully work with RHEV 3.1 (and properly oVirt 3.1):

https://labs.ovido.at/monitoring/wiki/check_rhev3

It would be great if you could test it with oVirt and give me some
feedback :)


-- 
Regards,

DI (FH) René Koch
Senior Solution Architect


ovido gmbh - "Das Linux Systemhaus"
Brünner Straße 163, A-1210 Wien

Phone:   +43 720 / 530 670
Mobile:  +43 660 / 512 21 31
E-Mail:  r.k...@ovido.at



On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 11:46 -0200, Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
> Dear Itamar,
> 
> 
>My dreams for oVirt 3.2:
> 
> 
>1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent);
>2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
>3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and
> largest world use;
>4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual
> Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
>5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option; 
>6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem
> clusters, and more...) example:
> https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev
> 
> 
>I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much
> higher ...
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Marcelo Barbosa
> mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald
>  wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren
> Grunewald wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar
> Heim wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> as we wrap oVirt 3.2,
> I wanted to check with
> oVirt users on what
> they
> find good/useful in
> oVirt, and what they
> would like to see
> improved/added in
> coming versions?
> 
> A nice feature would be to be
> able to migrate guests between
> AMD and
> Intel host machines.
> KVM should be able to support
> it [1]. I don't know if other
> hypervisors
> are able/can to support this.
> Because oVirt aims to support
> different
> hypervisors it might be
> problematic. But I think
> offline migration
> should be possible.
> 
> can you please elaborate what do you
> mean by offline migration?
> 
> 
> With offline  migration, I means the guest is
> not running while moving
> it from one host to another.
> 
> I have 2 host machines for testing. One is
> running on a AMD Opteron and
> the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both
> machines in the same
> cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD
> (for the opteron) and
> another called Intel (for the xeon).
> Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD
> machine to the Intel
> machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't.
> 
> I'm not aware that you can't.
> 
> 
> Ok, now is see my problem.
> 
> 
> you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to
> the other.
> yes, it will see a differen

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Shu Ming]

1) I would like to have the ability to import an existing VM image from 
outside as a template into oVirt, then new VMs can be cloned from this 
template.
2) I would like to have an oVirt trial package based on nested-kvm. This 
package will contain several vdsm node images, one engine image and one 
storage several image. After the package is installed into a physical 
server, the images can be started as VMs including the engine, the VDSM 
nodes, the storage server. The VDSM nodes must support nested-kvm to 
have nested VM on them. It is very quick and simple for a new-comer to 
try the oVirt envionment.


Itamar Heim:

Hi Everyone,

as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they 
find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see 
improved/added in coming versions?


Thanks,
Itamar
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users




--
---
舒明 Shu Ming
Open Virtualization Engineerning; CSTL, IBM Corp.
Tel: 86-10-82451626  Tieline: 9051626 E-mail: shum...@cn.ibm.com or 
shum...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian District, 
Beijing 100193, PRC


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[David Jaša]

Marcelo Barbosa píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 11:46 -0200:
> Dear Itamar,
> 
> 
>My dreams for oVirt 3.2:
> 
> 
>1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent);
>2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
>3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and largest 
> world use;

spice-xpi 2.8 will support chrome/chromium but it will still be linux-only.

David

>4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual 
> Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
>5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option; 
>6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem 
> clusters, and more...) example: 
> https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev
> 
> 
>I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much higher ...
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Marcelo Barbosa
> mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald 
>  wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald 
> wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim 
> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I 
> wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> find good/useful in oVirt, 
> and what they would like to see
> improved/added in coming 
> versions?
> 
> A nice feature would be to be able to 
> migrate guests between AMD and
> Intel host machines.
> KVM should be able to support it [1]. 
> I don't know if other hypervisors
> are able/can to support this. Because 
> oVirt aims to support different
> hypervisors it might be problematic. 
> But I think offline migration
> should be possible.
> 
> can you please elaborate what do you mean by 
> offline migration?
> 
> 
> With offline  migration, I means the guest is not 
> running while moving
> it from one host to another.
> 
> I have 2 host machines for testing. One is running on 
> a AMD Opteron and
> the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both 
> machines in the same
> cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD (for 
> the opteron) and
> another called Intel (for the xeon).
> Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD machine 
> to the Intel
> machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't.
> 
> I'm not aware that you can't.
> 
> 
> Ok, now is see my problem.
> 
> 
> you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to the 
> other.
> yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an issue?
> 
> 
> 
> To move the guest I need to "edit" the guest and than I can change 
> the cluster.
> 
> Thanks,
> Soeren
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I assume the solution for this could be a generic 
> cluster definition.
> Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal to 
> the qemu
> configuration "-cpu qemu32" or "-cpu qemu64".
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Soeren
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 

David Jaša, RHCE

SPICE QE based in Brno
GPG Key: 22C33E24 
Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Bret Palsson]

I'd like to see a built in VNC console that is java or a Spice java
console, something that runs cross platform, OS X, Windows, Linux etc...

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:04 AM, David Jaša  wrote:

> Marcelo Barbosa píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 11:46 -0200:
> > Dear Itamar,
> >
> >
> >My dreams for oVirt 3.2:
> >
> >
> >1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent);
> >2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
> >3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and
> largest world use;
>
> spice-xpi 2.8 will support chrome/chromium but it will still be linux-only.
>
> David
>
> >4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual
> Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
> >5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option;
> >6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem
> clusters, and more...) example:
> https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev
> >
> >
> >I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much higher ...
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Marcelo Barbosa
> > mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald <
> soeren.grunew...@avionic-design.de> wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren Grunewald
> wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar
> Heim wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I
> wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> > find good/useful in
> oVirt, and what they would like to see
> > improved/added in coming
> versions?
> >
> > A nice feature would be to be
> able to migrate guests between AMD and
> > Intel host machines.
> > KVM should be able to support it
> [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors
> > are able/can to support this.
> Because oVirt aims to support different
> > hypervisors it might be
> problematic. But I think offline migration
> > should be possible.
> >
> > can you please elaborate what do you
> mean by offline migration?
> >
> >
> > With offline  migration, I means the guest is
> not running while moving
> > it from one host to another.
> >
> > I have 2 host machines for testing. One is
> running on a AMD Opteron and
> > the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both
> machines in the same
> > cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD
> (for the opteron) and
> > another called Intel (for the xeon).
> > Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD
> machine to the Intel
> > machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't.
> >
> > I'm not aware that you can't.
> >
> >
> > Ok, now is see my problem.
> >
> >
> > you should be able to move the VM from one cluster to
> the other.
> > yes, it will see a different cpu model. why is that an
> issue?
> >
> >
> >
> > To move the guest I need to "edit" the guest and than I can
> change the cluster.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Soeren
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I assume the solution for this could be a
> generic cluster definition.
> > Something with a limited/specific cpu set equal
> to the qemu
> > configuration "-cpu qemu32" or "-cpu qemu64".
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Soeren
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> --
>
> David Jaša, RHCE
>
> SPICE QE based in Brno
> GPG Key: 22C33E24
> Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Marcelo Barbosa]

René,

   Thanks for return, i go test your solution and realy wish feedback this
about it.

:)

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, René Koch (ovido)  wrote:

> Hi Marcelo,
>
> Regarding your 6. point:
>
> I wrote a plugin for Icinga/Nagios to check RHEV 3.0 environment using
> REST-API. At the moment there are 2 bugs (1 fixed in latest svn trunk, 1
> open) to fully work with RHEV 3.1 (and properly oVirt 3.1):
>
> https://labs.ovido.at/monitoring/wiki/check_rhev3
>
> It would be great if you could test it with oVirt and give me some
> feedback :)
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> DI (FH) René Koch
> Senior Solution Architect
>
> 
> ovido gmbh - "Das Linux Systemhaus"
> Brünner Straße 163, A-1210 Wien
>
> Phone:   +43 720 / 530 670
> Mobile:  +43 660 / 512 21 31
> E-Mail:  r.k...@ovido.at
> 
>
>
> On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 11:46 -0200, Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
> > Dear Itamar,
> >
> >
> >My dreams for oVirt 3.2:
> >
> >
> >1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent);
> >2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
> >3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere O.S. and
> > largest world use;
> >4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from vm OR Virtual
> > Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
> >5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option;
> >6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total vms, mem
> > clusters, and more...) example:
> > https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev
> >
> >
> >I think this would oVirt the project to another level, much
> > higher ...
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Marcelo Barbosa
> > mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald
> >  wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM, Soeren
> > Grunewald wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar
> > Heim wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > as we wrap oVirt 3.2,
> > I wanted to check with
> > oVirt users on what
> > they
> > find good/useful in
> > oVirt, and what they
> > would like to see
> > improved/added in
> > coming versions?
> >
> > A nice feature would be to be
> > able to migrate guests between
> > AMD and
> > Intel host machines.
> > KVM should be able to support
> > it [1]. I don't know if other
> > hypervisors
> > are able/can to support this.
> > Because oVirt aims to support
> > different
> > hypervisors it might be
> > problematic. But I think
> > offline migration
> > should be possible.
> >
> > can you please elaborate what do you
> > mean by offline migration?
> >
> >
> > With offline  migration, I means the guest is
> > not running while moving
> > it from one host to another.
> >
> > I have 2 host machines for testing. One is
> > running on a AMD Opteron and
> > the other Intel Xeon. Since I can not put both
> > machines in the same
> > cluster, I have specified a cluster called AMD
> > (for the opteron) and
> > another called Intel (for the xeon).
> > Now I would like to move a guest from the AMD
> > machine to the Intel
> > machine. Since the CPU does not match I can't.
> >
> > I'm not aware that you can't.
> >
> >
> > Ok, now is see my 

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[David Jaša]

Bret Palsson píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 08:05 -0700:
> I'd like to see a built in VNC console that is java or a Spice java
> console, something that runs cross platform, OS X, Windows, Linux
> etc...

There are purely browser-based solutions for both: noVNC (mature AFAIK)
and spice-html5 (still in beta quality, developers welcome). The problem
with both is that they require websockets on server side which is not
yet ready in qemu - spice-server implementation had to be reverted and
will need a rewrite and libvncserver gained initial support just few
months ago.

I'm sure that web-based consoles will be available in oVirt shortly
after all layers below get the necessary features.

David

> 
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:04 AM, David Jaša  wrote:
> Marcelo Barbosa píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 11:46 -0200:
> > Dear Itamar,
> >
> >
> >My dreams for oVirt 3.2:
> >
> >
> >1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine, ovirt-guest-agent);
> >2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
> >3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in anywere
> O.S. and largest world use;
> 
> 
> spice-xpi 2.8 will support chrome/chromium but it will still
> be linux-only.
> 
> David
> 
> >4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from vm
> OR Virtual Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
> >5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option;
> >6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and Nagios(total
> vms, mem clusters, and more...) example:
> https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev
> >
> >
> >I think this would oVirt the project to another level,
> much higher ...
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Marcelo Barbosa
> > mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald
>  wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald
> wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar Heim
> wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM,
> Soeren Grunewald wrote:
> > On 01/03/2013 05:08
> PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > as we wrap
> oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> > find
> good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
> >
> improved/added in coming versions?
> >
> > A nice feature would
> be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and
> > Intel host machines.
> > KVM should be able
> to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors
> > are able/can to
> support this. Because oVirt aims to support different
> > hypervisors it might
> be problematic. But I think offline migration
> > should be possible.
> >
> > can you please elaborate
> what do you mean by offline migration?
> >
> >
> > With offline  migration, I means the
> guest is not running while moving
> > it from one host to another.
> >
> > I have 2 host machines for testing.
> One is running on a AMD Opteron and
> > the other Intel Xeon. Since I can
> not put both machines in the same
> > cluster, I have specified a cluster
> called AMD (for the opteron) and
> > another called Intel (for the xeon).
> > Now I would like to move a guest
> from the AMD machine to the Intel
> > machine. Since the CPU does not
> match I can't.
> >
> > I'm not aware that you can't.
> >
> >
> > Ok, now is see my problem.
> >
> >
> > you should be able to move the VM from one
> cluster to the other.
> > yes, it will see a different cpu model. why
> is that an issue?
> >
> >
> >
> > To move t

[Users] "ataX: resetting link" problem with ovirt 3.1 on Fedora Core 17

[Yuval M]

Hello,
We're M.Sc students at Tel-Aviv University trying to setup a basic ovirt
system with 2 hosts.
Both run Fedora Core 17.

We've run unto a problem that makes the hosts seem down from the web
management UI and stops the VMs that run on them.
this occurs on both hosts at the very same second, which leads me to
believe it's not a hardware problem:
("segfault" is the name of the server. don't ask.)

Has anyone seen something like this?
any suggestions?
Thanks,

Yuval Meir
Limor Gavish



Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.851539] NFS: Cache request denied
due to non-unique superblock keys
Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.930361] ata1: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.237778] ata1: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.239721] ata1: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.241759] ata2: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.548726] ata2: SATA link up 6.0
Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559061] ata2.00: configured for
UDMA/133
Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559066] ata2: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559279] ata3: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.866689] ata3: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868680] ata3: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868928] ata4: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.176588] ata4: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178470] ata4: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178707] ata5: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.485535] ata5: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487472] ata5: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487656] ata6: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.795437] ata6: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797325] ata6: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797583] ata7: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.105616] ata7: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.107307] ata7: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.109318] ata8: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416217] ata8: SATA link up 1.5
Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416650] ata8.00: configured for
UDMA/66
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416769] ata8: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416922] ata9: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722240] ata9: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722256] ata9: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722545] ata10: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027130] ata10: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027234] ata10: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027483] ata11.00: hard resetting
link
Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.331952] ata11.01: hard resetting
link
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787975] ata11.00: SATA link up 3.0
Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787989] ata11.01: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829480] ata11.00: configured for
UDMA/133
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829487] ata11: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829638] ata12.00: hard resetting
link
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.133734] ata12.01: hard resetting
link
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589741] ata12.00: SATA link up 3.0
Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589757] ata12.01: SATA link up 3.0
Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.600049] ata12.00: configured for
UDMA/133
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.60] ata12.01: configured for
UDMA/133
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604450] ata12: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604745] ata13: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921125] ata13: SATA link down
(SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921144] ata13: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921300] ata14: hard resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.377523] ata14: SATA link up 1.5
Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.386842] ata14.00: configured for
UDMA/100
Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.392491] ata14: EH complete
Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.392695] ata15: soft resetting link
Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403602.543523] ata15: EH complete
De

Re: [Users] Destktop VM to Server VM ?

[Hideo Goto]

Thaks a lot for your suggestion.

in fact I found the parameter which specifies server/desktop,
checking the output of VMs' parameters by REST (/api/vms).
Is it this very "type" paramter to change?

Best RGDS
Hideo GOTO

P.S.
I would be happy if you could recomend me any  tool, if existing,
which might make it easy to update parameters by REST.

2013/1/4 Itamar Heim :
> On 01/03/2013 05:32 PM, Hideo Goto wrote:
>>
>> First of all, a Happy new year to every subscriber of the list.
>>
>> My first concern of the year about ovirt:
>>
>> Is it possible to change the type of an existing VM from desktop to
>> server by any possible means?
>> In my case, the VM was imported from KVM to Ovirt 3.0 environment
>> using virt-v2v. I have just found out that the VM was recognized as
>> desktop while expected as server .
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any advise.
>
>
> I'm pretty sure the REST API/SDK/CLI would allow this as updating this field
> of the VM.
> michael?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Destktop VM to Server VM ?

[Itamar Heim]

On 01/04/2013 07:04 PM, Hideo Goto wrote:

Thaks a lot for your suggestion.

in fact I found the parameter which specifies server/desktop,
checking the output of VMs' parameters by REST (/api/vms).
Is it this very "type" paramter to change?


yes.



Best RGDS
Hideo GOTO

P.S.
I would be happy if you could recomend me any  tool, if existing,
which might make it easy to update parameters by REST.


ovirt-shell is a cli tool which should let you update such a parameter 
with a one liner command.

you can also use the python or java sdk's for any heavier scripting.



2013/1/4 Itamar Heim :

On 01/03/2013 05:32 PM, Hideo Goto wrote:


First of all, a Happy new year to every subscriber of the list.

My first concern of the year about ovirt:

Is it possible to change the type of an existing VM from desktop to
server by any possible means?
In my case, the VM was imported from KVM to Ovirt 3.0 environment
using virt-v2v. I have just found out that the VM was recognized as
desktop while expected as server .

Thanks in advance for any advise.



I'm pretty sure the REST API/SDK/CLI would allow this as updating this field
of the VM.
michael?



___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Destktop VM to Server VM ?

[Koch (ovido)]

Hi,

You can edit the .ovf file of your vm on the export domain.

Change  to:
0 ... Desktop
1 ... Server

Then you can import your server/desktop vm using the engine GUI...


-- 
Regards,

DI (FH) René Koch
Senior Solution Architect


ovido gmbh - "Das Linux Systemhaus"
Brünner Straße 163, A-1210 Wien

Phone:   +43 720 / 530 670
Mobile:  +43 660 / 512 21 31
E-Mail:  r.k...@ovido.at



On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 02:04 +0900, Hideo Goto wrote:
> Thaks a lot for your suggestion.
> 
> in fact I found the parameter which specifies server/desktop,
> checking the output of VMs' parameters by REST (/api/vms).
> Is it this very "type" paramter to change?
> 
> Best RGDS
> Hideo GOTO
> 
> P.S.
> I would be happy if you could recomend me any  tool, if existing,
> which might make it easy to update parameters by REST.
> 
> 2013/1/4 Itamar Heim :
> > On 01/03/2013 05:32 PM, Hideo Goto wrote:
> >>
> >> First of all, a Happy new year to every subscriber of the list.
> >>
> >> My first concern of the year about ovirt:
> >>
> >> Is it possible to change the type of an existing VM from desktop to
> >> server by any possible means?
> >> In my case, the VM was imported from KVM to Ovirt 3.0 environment
> >> using virt-v2v. I have just found out that the VM was recognized as
> >> desktop while expected as server .
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for any advise.
> >
> >
> > I'm pretty sure the REST API/SDK/CLI would allow this as updating this field
> > of the VM.
> > michael?
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] "ataX: resetting link" problem with ovirt 3.1 on Fedora Core 17

[Marcelo Barbosa]

Hi Yuval,

   What is kernel version ? The oVirt stable version(3.1) run better from:

   [admin@firehome ~]$ uname -a
Linux firehome.no-ip.org *3.3.4-5*.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 7 17:29:34
UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64GNU/Linux

Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Yuval M  wrote:

> Hello,
> We're M.Sc students at Tel-Aviv University trying to setup a basic ovirt
> system with 2 hosts.
> Both run Fedora Core 17.
>
> We've run unto a problem that makes the hosts seem down from the web
> management UI and stops the VMs that run on them.
> this occurs on both hosts at the very same second, which leads me to
> believe it's not a hardware problem:
> ("segfault" is the name of the server. don't ask.)
>
> Has anyone seen something like this?
> any suggestions?
> Thanks,
>
> Yuval Meir
> Limor Gavish
>
>
>
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.851539] NFS: Cache request denied
> due to non-unique superblock keys
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.930361] ata1: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.237778] ata1: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.239721] ata1: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.241759] ata2: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.548726] ata2: SATA link up 6.0
> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559061] ata2.00: configured for
> UDMA/133
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559066] ata2: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559279] ata3: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.866689] ata3: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868680] ata3: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868928] ata4: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.176588] ata4: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178470] ata4: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178707] ata5: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.485535] ata5: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487472] ata5: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487656] ata6: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.795437] ata6: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797325] ata6: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797583] ata7: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.105616] ata7: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.107307] ata7: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.109318] ata8: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416217] ata8: SATA link up 1.5
> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416650] ata8.00: configured for
> UDMA/66
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416769] ata8: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416922] ata9: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722240] ata9: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722256] ata9: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722545] ata10: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027130] ata10: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027234] ata10: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027483] ata11.00: hard resetting
> link
> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.331952] ata11.01: hard resetting
> link
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787975] ata11.00: SATA link up
> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787989] ata11.01: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829480] ata11.00: configured for
> UDMA/133
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829487] ata11: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829638] ata12.00: hard resetting
> link
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.133734] ata12.01: hard resetting
> link
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589741] ata12.00: SATA link up
> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589757] ata12.01: SATA link up
> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.600049] ata12.00: configured for
> UDMA/133
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.60] ata12.01: configured for
> UDMA/133
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604450] ata12: EH complete
> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.604745] ata13: hard resetting link
> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kernel: [403601.921125] ata13: SATA link down
> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Dec 29 14:00:15 segfault kerne

[Users] Missing archives

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On 21 Dec I fixed the archive for this mailing list at the request of a
user.

When I did that, I failed to set the permissions and ownership for the
changed mailbox file. It remained owned by root, so Mailman was unable
to write to the archives. :( :(

I think we can fix this if anyone has a copy of all the email sent to
this list since 21 Dec. in an .mbox format.

Anyone have everything from 21 Dec. to this message I just sent (which
should hit the archives)?

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org  .^\  http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v'  gpg: AD0E0C41



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Missing archives

[Joop]

Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:

On 21 Dec I fixed the archive for this mailing list at the request of a
user.

When I did that, I failed to set the permissions and ownership for the
changed mailbox file. It remained owned by root, so Mailman was unable
to write to the archives. :( :(

I think we can fix this if anyone has a copy of all the email sent to
this list since 21 Dec. in an .mbox format.

Anyone have everything from 21 Dec. to this message I just sent (which
should hit the archives)?

  
I have an archive of Ovirt-Users starting from 2-jun til now in 
Thunderbird format. Can prune a copy if you want, just let me know.


Joop

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Andrew Cathrow]

- Original Message -
> From: "David Jaša" 
> To: "Bret Palsson" 
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 10:20:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?
> 
> Bret Palsson píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 08:05 -0700:
> > I'd like to see a built in VNC console that is java or a Spice java
> > console, something that runs cross platform, OS X, Windows, Linux
> > etc...
> 
> There are purely browser-based solutions for both: noVNC (mature
> AFAIK)
> and spice-html5 (still in beta quality, developers welcome). The
> problem

Beta quality is probably a little optimistic for spice-htm4

> with both is that they require websockets on server side which is not
> yet ready in qemu - spice-server implementation had to be reverted
> and

You can run a novnc server on another host to proxy it - similar to what 
Horizon does.


> will need a rewrite and libvncserver gained initial support just few
> months ago.
> 
> I'm sure that web-based consoles will be available in oVirt shortly
> after all layers below get the necessary features.
> 
> David
> 
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:04 AM, David Jaša 
> > wrote:
> > Marcelo Barbosa píše v Pá 04. 01. 2013 v 11:46 -0200:
> > > Dear Itamar,
> > >
> > >
> > >My dreams for oVirt 3.2:
> > >
> > >
> > >1) Packages CentOs 6.x (ovirt-engine,
> > >ovirt-guest-agent);
> > >2) Resize VM disk from GUI ovirt-engine;
> > >3) Spice for Google Chrome, this browser run in
> > >anywere
> > O.S. and largest world use;
> > 
> > 
> > spice-xpi 2.8 will support chrome/chromium but it will
> > still
> > be linux-only.
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > >4) Show in Virtual Machines > General > ip/ip's from
> > >vm
> > OR Virtual Machines > Network Interfaces > show ip;
> > >5) ISO upload from GUI ovirt-engine the best option;
> > >6) Monitoring enviroment oVirt to Zabbix and
> > >Nagios(total
> > vms, mem clusters, and more...) example:
> > https://github.com/dougsland/nagios-plugins-rhev
> > >
> > >
> > >I think this would oVirt the project to another level,
> > much higher ...
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Marcelo Barbosa
> > > mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Soeren Grunewald
> >  wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 07:04 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 07:25 PM, Soeren Grunewald
> > wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 05:33 PM, Itamar
> > > Heim
> > wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013 06:28 PM,
> > Soeren Grunewald wrote:
> > > On 01/03/2013
> > > 05:08
> > PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > Everyone,
> > >
> > > as we
> > > wrap
> > oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> > > find
> > good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
> > >
> > improved/added in coming versions?
> > >
> > > A nice feature
> > > would
> > be to be able to migrate guests between AMD and
> > > Intel host
> > > machines.
> > > KVM should be
> > > able
> > to support it [1]. I don't know if other hypervisors
> > > are able/can to
> > support this. Because oVirt aims to support different
> > > hypervisors it
> > > might
> > be problematic. But I think offline migration
> > > should be
> > > possible.
> > >
> > > can you please elaborate
> > what do you mean by offline migration?
> > >
> > >
> > > With offline  migration, I means
> > > the
> > guest is not 

Re: [Users] "ataX: resetting link" problem with ovirt 3.1 on Fedora Core 17

[Yuval M]

uname -a output:

Linux segfault.home 3.6.5-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 31 19:37:18 UTC 2012
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

and the other host:

Linux kernelpanic.home 3.6.8-2.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 27 19:35:02 UTC
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

if there is any other diagnostic information required I will happily supply
it, just tell me what...


Yuval


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Marcelo Barbosa <
mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Yuval,
>
>What is kernel version ? The oVirt stable version(3.1) run better from:
>
>[admin@firehome ~]$ uname -a
> Linux firehome.no-ip.org *3.3.4-5*.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 7 17:29:34
> UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64GNU/Linux
>
> Marcelo Barbosa
> *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Yuval M  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> We're M.Sc students at Tel-Aviv University trying to setup a basic ovirt
>> system with 2 hosts.
>> Both run Fedora Core 17.
>>
>> We've run unto a problem that makes the hosts seem down from the web
>> management UI and stops the VMs that run on them.
>> this occurs on both hosts at the very same second, which leads me to
>> believe it's not a hardware problem:
>> ("segfault" is the name of the server. don't ask.)
>>
>> Has anyone seen something like this?
>> any suggestions?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yuval Meir
>> Limor Gavish
>>
>>
>>
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.851539] NFS: Cache request
>> denied due to non-unique superblock keys
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.930361] ata1: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.237778] ata1: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.239721] ata1: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.241759] ata2: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.548726] ata2: SATA link up 6.0
>> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559061] ata2.00: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559066] ata2: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559279] ata3: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.866689] ata3: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868680] ata3: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868928] ata4: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.176588] ata4: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178470] ata4: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178707] ata5: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.485535] ata5: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487472] ata5: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.487656] ata6: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.795437] ata6: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797325] ata6: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403598.797583] ata7: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.105616] ata7: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.107307] ata7: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.109318] ata8: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416217] ata8: SATA link up 1.5
>> Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416650] ata8.00: configured for
>> UDMA/66
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416769] ata8: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:12 segfault kernel: [403599.416922] ata9: hard resetting link
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722240] ata9: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722256] ata9: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403599.722545] ata10: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027130] ata10: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027234] ata10: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.027483] ata11.00: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:13 segfault kernel: [403600.331952] ata11.01: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787975] ata11.00: SATA link up
>> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.787989] ata11.01: SATA link down
>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829480] ata11.00: configured for
>> UDMA/133
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829487] ata11: EH complete
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403600.829638] ata12.00: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.133734] ata12.01: hard resetting
>> link
>> Dec 29 14:00:14 segfault kernel: [403601.589741] ata12.00: SATA link up
>> 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>

Re: [Users] Missing archives

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

(Sorry for the broken threading by replying to myself, I didn't get
Joop's reply directly, not sure why, but at least it appeared in the
archives!)

Joop wrote:

> I have an archive of Ovirt-Users starting from 2-jun til now in
> Thunderbird format. Can prune a copy if you want, just let me know.

That would be great, thanks. Is it small enough to gzip and email to me?
I think the Thunderbird mbox format is the same.

(I have a copy of all the messages as well, but I have all my oVirt
project email going in to one folder, so the users@ email is mixed in
with arch@ etc.)

Thanks - Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org  .^\  http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v'  gpg: AD0E0C41



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] Missing archives

[Joop]

Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:

(Sorry for the broken threading by replying to myself, I didn't get
Joop's reply directly, not sure why, but at least it appeared in the
archives!)

Joop wrote:

  

I have an archive of Ovirt-Users starting from 2-jun til now in
Thunderbird format. Can prune a copy if you want, just let me know.



That would be great, thanks. Is it small enough to gzip and email to me?
I think the Thunderbird mbox format is the same.

(I have a copy of all the messages as well, but I have all my oVirt
project email going in to one folder, so the users@ email is mixed in
with arch@ etc.)

Thanks - Karsten
  
gzip -9 gives an archive of 10Mb. Will put it on wetransfer.com and send 
you the location.


Joop

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] ovirt and EqualLogic iSCSI SAN

[Gianluca Cecchi]

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Dan Yasny wrote:

> BTW, if Dell try for a "not supported" again, you can point them to
>
> http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/b/techcenter/archive/2013/01/03/announcing-the-release-of-red-hat-enterprise-rhev-3-1-on-dell-poweredge-servers.aspx
>
> They have a similar announcement for 3.0:
>
> http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/b/techcenter/archive/2012/07/13/red-hat-enterprise-virtualization-rhev-3-0-works-on-dell-poweredge-servers.aspxthough
>  worded slightly differently
>
>
Useful links and related documents, but they only talk about support for
the Dell server part in RHEV 3.x and related OpenManage sw while they never
explicitly cite the storage array part in general, and Equallogic in
particular... probably for some reason...

Gianluca
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] win 7 vm creation:

[Gianluca Cecchi]

Hello,
on F18 physical host configured all-in-one oVirt nightly
(
ovirt-engine-3.2.0-1.20130101.git2184580.fc18.noarch
)

Trying to setup a w7 vm in run once, I get

Error
win7tst:

   - Cannot run VM. There are no available running Hosts in the Host
   Cluster.

Here are screenshots for:
vm network
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwoPbcrMv8mvQWpwMUh6ZGRVeGc

host network, after setting it up with drag of ovirtmgmt to em3
(the host currently has only em3.65 configured)
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwoPbcrMv8mvRkVLSlkxWnRwakE

engine log gzipped:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwoPbcrMv8mvcXRERkEyQW5Yc1U

Is there an evident error in my config or should I send any other log?

screenshots for local_cluster and local_host situation
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwoPbcrMv8mvNV8zWTJLWHFhdFU
and
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwoPbcrMv8mvejlGUW5UWkxKMDg

Thanks,
Gianluca
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] win 7 vm creation:

[Gianluca Cecchi]

Current siuation if I select host and click on "setup host networks" for it:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BwoPbcrMv8mvMjFONTd2UEdXWWM
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] win 7 vm creation:

[Gianluca Cecchi]

Current network config on host:

# ip addr list
1: lo:  mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: em1:  mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen
1000
link/ether 00:1e:0b:21:b8:c4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::21e:bff:fe21:b8c4/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: em2:  mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen
1000
link/ether 00:1e:0b:21:b8:c6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::21e:bff:fe21:b8c6/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: em3:  mtu 1500 qdisc mq master
ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 00:1c:c4:ab:3a:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: em4:  mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen
1000
link/ether 00:1c:c4:ab:3a:de brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::21c:c4ff:feab:3ade/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
6: em3.65@em3:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
state UP
link/ether 00:1c:c4:ab:3a:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.4.4.59/24 brd 10.4.4.255 scope global em3.65
inet6 fe80::21c:c4ff:feab:3add/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
11: ;vdsmdummy;:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/ether 96:14:65:da:bc:c5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
12: bond0:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
13: bond4:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
14: bond1:  mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
15: ovirtmgmt:  mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
state UP
link/ether 00:1c:c4:ab:3a:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::21c:c4ff:feab:3add/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
;vdsmdummy; 8000. no
ovirtmgmt 8000.001cc4ab3add no em3

Do I have perhaps to say/config that ovirtmgmt is tagged in any way?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] Default compatibility version in ovirt nightly

[Gianluca Cecchi]

Hello,
I remember some time ago someone writing about compatibility version
defaults for 3.2 that should be put to 3.2.
I'm using oVirt nightly in all-in-one config as of
 ovirt-engine-3.2.0-1.20130101.git2184580.fc18.noarch

but compatibility versions defaults are still 3.1 both for local_datacenter
and local_cluster and Default Datacenter and Cluster

Gianluca
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Users] Subject: Re: What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Thomas Scofield]

- Ovirt management server should be able to run as a virtual machine
managed by ovirt
- Clustered management server, active/passive, or even better active/active
- Support for additional iternal users, so monitoring and automation don't
need to rely on an external source for authentication
- guest agent should have the ability to configure portions of the virtual
machine
-- set the hostname of the virtual machine
-- configure the network information for the virtual machine
-- reset root password

> Hi Everyone,
>
> as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they
> find good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see
> improved/added in coming versions?
>
> Thanks,
> Itamar
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] "ataX: resetting link" problem with ovirt 3.1 on Fedora Core 17

[Marcelo Barbosa]

Yuval,

   Probably Your problem this with version kernel, this version not
compatible with some VDSM version, i recommend alter this is version kernel
of hosts and reboot. If do not know alter, follow the steps below:

Verifie yours vmlinuz's images:

   [root@firehome boot]# ls -l /boot/vmlinuz-3.*
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4662160 Mai  7  2012
/boot/vmlinuz-3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 4839872 Dez 11 16:11
/boot/vmlinuz-3.6.10-2.fc17.x86_64
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 4839776 Dez  4 11:30
/boot/vmlinuz-3.6.9-2.fc17.x86_64

   Alter your configuration in container "menuentry..." for kernel version
3.3.4*, example:

   [root@firehome ~]# vim /boot/grub2/grub.cfg

   ### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
   menuentry 'Fedora Linux' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu
--class os $menuentry_id_option
'gnulinux-simple-f23745bb-fd60-43b7-ac0f-6600ba582ad7' {
load_video
set gfxpayload=keep
insmod gzio
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='hd0,msdos1'
if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
  search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root --hint-bios=hd0,msdos1
--hint-efi=hd0,msdos1 --hint-baremetal=ahci0,msdos1 --hint='hd0,msdos1'
 508a2fe6-6263-4521-bf7d-83363b71edfd
else
  search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
508a2fe6-6263-4521-bf7d-83363b71edfd
fi
echo'Loading Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 ...'
linux   /vmlinuz-3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64
root=/dev/mapper/vg_ovirt00-lv_root ro rd.lvm.lv=vg_ovirt00/lv_root rd.md=0
rd.dm=0 SYSFONT=True  KEYTABLE=us rd.luks=0 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
rd.lvm.lv=vg_ovirt00/lv_swap
rd.lvm.lv=vg_ovirt/lv_swap rhgb quiet
echo'Loading initial ramdisk ...'


   After reboot your host, check:

[root@firehome ~]# uname -a

   Test your storage use, I believe it will be alright.

PS: Get your version this VDSM package, example:

[root@firehome boot]# rpm -qa | grep vdsm
vdsm-python-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-bootstrap-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-xmlrpc-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-cli-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64


Marcelo Barbosa
*mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*


On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Yuval M  wrote:

> uname -a output:
>
> Linux segfault.home 3.6.5-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 31 19:37:18 UTC
> 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> and the other host:
>
> Linux kernelpanic.home 3.6.8-2.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 27 19:35:02 UTC
> 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> if there is any other diagnostic information required I will happily
> supply it, just tell me what...
>
>
> Yuval
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Marcelo Barbosa <
> mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yuval,
>>
>>What is kernel version ? The oVirt stable version(3.1) run better
>> from:
>>
>>[admin@firehome ~]$ uname -a
>> Linux firehome.no-ip.org *3.3.4-5*.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 7 17:29:34
>> UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64GNU/Linux
>>
>> Marcelo Barbosa
>> *mr.marcelo.barb...@gmail.com*
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Yuval M  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> We're M.Sc students at Tel-Aviv University trying to setup a basic ovirt
>>> system with 2 hosts.
>>> Both run Fedora Core 17.
>>>
>>> We've run unto a problem that makes the hosts seem down from the web
>>> management UI and stops the VMs that run on them.
>>> this occurs on both hosts at the very same second, which leads me to
>>> believe it's not a hardware problem:
>>> ("segfault" is the name of the server. don't ask.)
>>>
>>> Has anyone seen something like this?
>>> any suggestions?
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Yuval Meir
>>> Limor Gavish
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.851539] NFS: Cache request
>>> denied due to non-unique superblock keys
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403596.930361] ata1: hard resetting
>>> link
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.237778] ata1: SATA link down
>>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.239721] ata1: EH complete
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.241759] ata2: hard resetting
>>> link
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.548726] ata2: SATA link up 6.0
>>> Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559061] ata2.00: configured for
>>> UDMA/133
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559066] ata2: EH complete
>>> Dec 29 14:00:10 segfault kernel: [403597.559279] ata3: hard resetting
>>> link
>>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.866689] ata3: SATA link down
>>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868680] ata3: EH complete
>>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403597.868928] ata4: hard resetting
>>> link
>>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.176588] ata4: SATA link down
>>> (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178470] ata4: EH complete
>>> Dec 29 14:00:11 segfault kernel: [403598.178707] ata5: hard resetting
>>> link
>>> Dec 29 14:00:1

Re: [Users] Default compatibility version in ovirt nightly

[Itamar Heim]

On 01/05/2013 03:14 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:

Hello,
I remember some time ago someone writing about compatibility version
defaults for 3.2 that should be put to 3.2.
I'm using oVirt nightly in all-in-one config as of
  ovirt-engine-3.2.0-1.20130101.git2184580.fc18.noarch

but compatibility versions defaults are still 3.1 both for
local_datacenter and local_cluster and Default Datacenter and Cluster

Gianluca


___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users



seems laszlo fixed the default DC/cluster[1].
i've sent this for the allinone (i'd appreciate if you can test in your 
environment it works and tick the 'verified' on the patch)


Change I5ae937b0: fix allinone version to 3.2 for dc/cluster default version
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/10673/

thanks,
   Itamar

[1] git show 153fce6582b7132d5689888497b38c182a1405ff
commit 153fce6582b7132d5689888497b38c182a1405ff
Author: Laszlo Hornyak 
Date:   Tue Dec 11 14:43:24 2012 +0100

engine: create DC and cluster as 3.2

Increases the DC and cluster compatibility version to 3.2 for fresh
installations

Change-Id: Ifc953f608d25bf6b9358575274537fbf5d766805
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Hornyak 

diff --git a/backend/manager/dbscripts/insert_data.sql 
b/backend/manager/dbscripts/insert_data.sql

index 3621d26..088ee17 100644
--- a/backend/manager/dbscripts/insert_data.sql
+++ b/backend/manager/dbscripts/insert_data.sql
@@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ BEGIN

 --INSERTING DATA INTO TABLE storage_pool

-INSERT INTO storage_pool 
(id,name,description,storage_pool_type,status,master_domain_version,compatibili
+INSERT INTO storage_pool 
(id,name,description,storage_pool_type,status,master_domain_version,compatibili

 --INSERTING DATA INTO TABLE vds_groups

-INSERT INTO vds_groups 
(vds_group_id,name,description,storage_pool_id,compatibility_version,transparent_
+INSERT INTO vds_groups 
(vds_group_id,name,description,storage_pool_id,compatibility_version,transparent_


 --INSERTING DATA INTO NETWORK table

___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] What do you want to see in oVirt next?

[Charlie]

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Itamar Heim  wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> as we wrap oVirt 3.2, I wanted to check with oVirt users on what they find
> good/useful in oVirt, and what they would like to see improved/added in
> coming versions?
>
> Thanks,
>Itamar

Good/useful:  Open Source virtualization with a strong web management
interface.  Rapidly improving, too.

wish improved:  SPICE connection reliability and LDAPS support.

wish added:  native ATA-over-Ethernet SAN support.

wish removed:  Kerberos dependencies.  Let people who want Kerb have
it, but don't force it where it's not needed.  LDAP over SSL is
secure.

Many thanks to all the oVirt team for all their hard work!

--Charlie
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users