Re: [Users] Installation of self hosted engine
Hi, - Original Message - > From: "Pavel Gandalipov" > To: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:22:05 AM > Subject: [Users] Installation of self hosted engine > Hello, could you help me with installation of self hosted engine on bare > Ovirt 3.3. It's actually "on bare metal", with "bare ovirt 3.3" inside it. > Where can i find any packages for installation? For now you can use the nightly repo. As a minimum, install 'ovirt-hosted-engine-setup' and run 'hosted-engine --deploy'. I don't think we have yet any wiki page for it. You can have a look at [1], which is for migrating an existing 3.3 engine to hosted-engine, but instead of backup/restore simply do a new setup inside the VM. [1] http://www.ovirt.org/Migrate_to_Hosted_Engine -- Didi ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Installation of self hosted engine
Hello, could you help me with installation of self hosted engine on bare Ovirt 3.3. Where can i find any packages for installation? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] EL5 support for VirtIO SCSI?
I have just set up an Ovirt 3.3.0 install and have done a test install of Centos 6.4 in a VM. The VM was configured with an IDE drive and a virtio-scsi drive. The Centos 6.4 install sees both drives OK. I'm wanting to do some testing on a product that is based on EL5, but I'm finding that it cannot see the virtio-scsi drive. It does show up in the output of 'lspci', but I don't see a corresponding 'sd' device. I've just tried installing Centos 5.10 and the support is not there. Does anyone know of any tricks to allow EL5 to see the virtio-scsi device?___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On 11/12/2013 04:52 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:51:36PM -0500, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been answered by others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build. We would appreciate if you could continue the tests with the new test build: F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172359 F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172521 EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172612 This last update includes the following patches: - The require hostname fix (http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21194/ should have been sent to gerrit long ago, I suppose) Not really, actually, http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.extras.cvs/1127350 shouldn't be included in the previous build and it was during the spec merge from fedora spec, 4.12.0 and 4.13.0 for 3.3, my bad. I did a new build on rawhide right now and the workaround is not needed anymore. I have back the original /bin/hostname for rawhide (as I did above). We should be fine with vdsm-4.13.0-11 or higher. -- Cheers Douglas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:51:36PM -0500, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: > > Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora > koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been > answered by others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build. > > We would appreciate if you could continue the tests with the new test build: > > F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172359 > F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172521 > EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172612 > > This last update includes the following patches: > - The require hostname fix (http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21194/ should have been sent to gerrit long ago, I suppose) ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Failed to start JBoss AS
Well, this looks to me like an instance of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=996005 That bug has not been updated in almost 3 months, however. The last note says "Working on CI". Does that mean Code Integration? It looks like maybe it was fixed in version "is10", whatever that is, and is currently Verified by QA. Is that right? Unfortunately that bug report has no description whatsoever of what the underlying problem was. I would like to know: 1. Is there any workaround? 2. Can I start again by re-installing Engine and importing, or is the issue with the exported VMs and/or template so I'd just hit the problem again? It sort of looks like the problem was with a template (org.ovirt.engine.core.common.action.ImportVmTemplateParameters). If so, can I import the VMs and avoid the Templates? Or am I perhaps misinterpreting that message? Shouldn't bug reports always contain some sort of diagnostic information about the underlying cause and/or workarounds? Thanks, Bob On 11/12/2013 03:08 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: Hi, I had a working engine, using 3.3.0 on Fedora 19. I rebooted my engine, and JBoss AS won't come back up. I get the attached errors from server.log. Has anyone seen this before? Any suggestions on how to recover? How I got here: I had a working Engine (mach1 F19) and Host (mach2 F19), but needed to play some musical chairs with my hardware to utilize a 3rd machine (mach3 RH6). My goal is to have mach2 become Engine, and mach3 Host. I did the following: 1. Created an NFS share on mach3, and used it as NFS Export Storage from mach2. 2. Exported my VMs and templates to the Export storage. 3. Removed mach2 from my Datacenter 4. Shut down mach1 5. Installed fresh F19 on mach2 (my old host), and installed Engine 3.3.0 on it 6. Added mach3 as Host 7. Imported my VMs and Templates from the Export Storage At this point all looked well. I rebooted mach2, but it won't come back up. I'd appreciate any insight. Thanks, Bob ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Hello Nir, On 11/12/2013 02:27 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: - Original Message - From: "Patrick Hurrelmann" To: "oVirt Mailing List" Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:34:20 AM Subject: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms Hi all, sorry for this rant, but... /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' \ client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent Fixed in upstream - http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21055/ Do we need a backport to ovirt-3.3? IMO yes, would be nice to have this patch as well. -- Cheers Douglas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Ovirt 3.3 removing disk failure
What I found so far...
Function returning error is getDomPath in
"/usr/share/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py":
def getDomPath(sdUUID):
pattern = os.path.join(sd.StorageDomain.storage_repository,
sd.DOMAIN_MNT_POINT, '*', sdUUID)
# Warning! You need a global proc pool big as the number of NFS
domains.
domPaths = getProcPool().glob.glob(pattern)
if len(domPaths) == 0:
raise se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID)
elif len(domPaths) > 1:
raise se.StorageDomainLayoutError(sdUUID)
else:
return domPaths[0]
When I click remove disk in engine, variable "pattern" gets
"/rhev/data-center/mnt/*/2799e01b-6e6e-4f3b-8cfe-779928ae9941", and
"domPaths" is empty
Dne 12. 11. 2013 20:18, piše Saša Friedrich:
After I changed the log level of vdsm I found the error:
Thread-5180::ERROR::2013-11-12
19:44:21,433::task::850::TaskManager.Task::(_setError)
Task=`42a933fa-97f1-4260-8bc5-86c057dc8184`::Unexpected error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 857, in _run
return fn(*args, **kargs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/logUtils.py", line 45, in wrapper
res = f(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 1529, in deleteImage
dom.deleteImage(sdUUID, imgUUID, volsByImg)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py", line 342, in deleteImage
currImgDir = getImagePath(sdUUID, imgUUID)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py", line 97, in getImagePath
return os.path.join(getDomPath(sdUUID), 'images', imgUUID)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py", line 89, in getDomPath
raise se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID)
StorageDomainDoesNotExist: Storage domain does not exist:
('2799e01b-6e6e-4f3b-8cfe-779928ae9941',)
Thread-5180::ERROR::2013-11-12
19:44:21,435::dispatcher::67::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run)
{'status': {'message': "Storage domain does not exist:
('2799e01b-6e6e-4f3b-8cfe-779928ae9941',)", 'code': 358}}
And this happens only when I want to delete virtual disk. VM alone
works fine.
Any clue?
tnx
Dne 12. 11. 2013 15:54, piše Saša Friedrich:
When I try to remove viritual disk from ovirt engine I get error
"User admin@internal finished removing disk test_vm with storage
failure in domain DATA_DOMAIN."
VM itself was running fine with no errors.
DATA_DOMAIN is GlusterFS replicated volume (on ovirt host).
ovirt engine comp (fc19)
ovirt-engine.noarch 3.3.0.1-1.fc19
ovirt host (fc19)
vdsm.x86_644.12.1-4.fc19
vdsm-gluster.noarch4.12.1-4.fc19
glusterfs-server.x86_643.4.1-1.fc19
tnx for help
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Failed to start JBoss AS
Hi, I had a working engine, using 3.3.0 on Fedora 19. I rebooted my engine, and JBoss AS won't come back up. I get the attached errors from server.log. Has anyone seen this before? Any suggestions on how to recover? How I got here: I had a working Engine (mach1 F19) and Host (mach2 F19), but needed to play some musical chairs with my hardware to utilize a 3rd machine (mach3 RH6). My goal is to have mach2 become Engine, and mach3 Host. I did the following: 1. Created an NFS share on mach3, and used it as NFS Export Storage from mach2. 2. Exported my VMs and templates to the Export storage. 3. Removed mach2 from my Datacenter 4. Shut down mach1 5. Installed fresh F19 on mach2 (my old host), and installed Engine 3.3.0 on it 6. Added mach3 as Host 7. Imported my VMs and Templates from the Export Storage At this point all looked well. I rebooted mach2, but it won't come back up. I'd appreciate any insight. Thanks, Bob 2013-11-12 14:46:50,145 ERROR [org.jboss.msc.service.fail] (MSC service thread 1-4) MSC01: Failed to start service jboss.deployment.subunit."engine.ear"."bll.jar".component.InitBackendServicesOnStartupBean.START: org.jboss.msc.service.StartException in service jboss.deployment.subunit."engine.ear"."bll.jar".component.InitBackendServicesOnStartupBean.START: Failed to start service at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.run(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1767) [jboss-msc.jar:1.0.2.GA] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) [rt.jar:1.7.0_45] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) [rt.jar:1.7.0_45] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744) [rt.jar:1.7.0_45] Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: JBAS011048: Failed to construct component instance at org.jboss.as.ee.component.BasicComponent.constructComponentInstance(BasicComponent.java:163) at org.jboss.as.ee.component.BasicComponent.createInstance(BasicComponent.java:85) at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.singleton.SingletonComponent.getComponentInstance(SingletonComponent.java:116) at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.singleton.SingletonComponent.start(SingletonComponent.java:130) at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ComponentStartService.start(ComponentStartService.java:44) at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.startService(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1811) [jboss-msc.jar:1.0.2.GA] at org.jboss.msc.service.ServiceControllerImpl$StartTask.run(ServiceControllerImpl.java:1746) [jboss-msc.jar:1.0.2.GA] ... 3 more Caused by: javax.ejb.EJBException: Unexpected Error at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.handleExceptionInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:163) at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.invokeInOurTx(CMTTxInterceptor.java:230) at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.CMTTxInterceptor.requiresNew(CMTTxInterceptor.java:333) at org.jboss.as.ejb3.tx.SingletonLifecycleCMTTxInterceptor.processInvocation(SingletonLifecycleCMTTxInterceptor.java:56) at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:288) at org.jboss.as.ejb3.component.interceptors.CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.processInvocation(CurrentInvocationContextInterceptor.java:41) at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:288) at org.jboss.as.ee.component.TCCLInterceptor.processInvocation(TCCLInterceptor.java:45) at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:288) at org.jboss.invocation.ChainedInterceptor.processInvocation(ChainedInterceptor.java:61) at org.jboss.as.ee.component.BasicComponent.constructComponentInstance(BasicComponent.java:161) ... 9 more Caused by: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.InitBackendServicesOnStartupBean.create(InitBackendServicesOnStartupBean.java:49) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) [rt.jar:1.7.0_45] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) [rt.jar:1.7.0_45] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) [rt.jar:1.7.0_45] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) [rt.jar:1.7.0_45] at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ManagedReferenceLifecycleMethodInterceptorFactory$ManagedReferenceLifecycleMethodInterceptor.processInvocation(ManagedReferenceLifecycleMethodInterceptorFactory.java:130) at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:288) at org.jboss.invocation.WeavedInterceptor.processInvocation(WeavedInterceptor.java:53) at org.jboss.invocation.InterceptorContext.proceed(InterceptorContext.java:288) at org.jboss.as.ee.component.ManagedReferenceInterceptorFactory$ManagedReferenceInterc
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
- Original Message - > From: "Patrick Hurrelmann" > To: "oVirt Mailing List" > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:34:20 AM > Subject: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms > > Hi all, > > sorry for this rant, but... > > /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' \ > client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests > vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf > vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg > vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 > continuation line under-indented for visual indent Fixed in upstream - http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21055/ Do we need a backport to ovirt-3.3? Nir ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Ovirt 3.3 removing disk failure
After I changed the log level of vdsm I found the error:
Thread-5180::ERROR::2013-11-12
19:44:21,433::task::850::TaskManager.Task::(_setError)
Task=`42a933fa-97f1-4260-8bc5-86c057dc8184`::Unexpected error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 857, in _run
return fn(*args, **kargs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/logUtils.py", line 45, in wrapper
res = f(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 1529, in deleteImage
dom.deleteImage(sdUUID, imgUUID, volsByImg)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py", line 342, in deleteImage
currImgDir = getImagePath(sdUUID, imgUUID)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py", line 97, in getImagePath
return os.path.join(getDomPath(sdUUID), 'images', imgUUID)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/fileSD.py", line 89, in getDomPath
raise se.StorageDomainDoesNotExist(sdUUID)
StorageDomainDoesNotExist: Storage domain does not exist:
('2799e01b-6e6e-4f3b-8cfe-779928ae9941',)
Thread-5180::ERROR::2013-11-12
19:44:21,435::dispatcher::67::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run)
{'status': {'message': "Storage domain does not exist:
('2799e01b-6e6e-4f3b-8cfe-779928ae9941',)", 'code': 358}}
And this happens only when I want to delete virtual disk. VM alone works
fine.
Any clue?
tnx
Dne 12. 11. 2013 15:54, piše Saša Friedrich:
When I try to remove viritual disk from ovirt engine I get error "User
admin@internal finished removing disk test_vm with storage failure in
domain DATA_DOMAIN."
VM itself was running fine with no errors.
DATA_DOMAIN is GlusterFS replicated volume (on ovirt host).
ovirt engine comp (fc19)
ovirt-engine.noarch 3.3.0.1-1.fc19
ovirt host (fc19)
vdsm.x86_644.12.1-4.fc19
vdsm-gluster.noarch4.12.1-4.fc19
glusterfs-server.x86_643.4.1-1.fc19
tnx for help
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On 12.11.2013 15:33, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > I suspect you are not interested in "excuses" for each of the failures, > let us look forwards. My conclusions are: > - Do not require non-yet-existing rpms. If we require a feature that is > not yet in Fedora/Centos, we must wait. This is already in effect, see > for example http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/20248/ and > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/19545 > > - There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec > requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days? > > - Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we > should update > http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages > accordingly - and more importantly, make that version available. > > Sandro, who built the python-pep8-1.4.6 that sits on the el6 Jenkins > slave? Could you make it publicly available? (I can volunteer > http://danken.fedorapeople.org again) Yes, exactly. It wasn't my intention to blame anyone. I just wanted to express how hard it can be to test and show up some points for future work ;) I'm looking forward to the recent QA plans. There has been an impressive overall improvement in the project over the last year, but there is still room for improvement. Thanks all. Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On 12.11.2013 19:15, Mike Burns wrote: > On 11/12/2013 03:51 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: >> >> Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora >> koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been answered by >> others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build. >> >> We would appreciate if you could continue the tests with the new test >> build: >> >> F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172359 >> F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172521 >> EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172612 >> >> This last update includes the following patches: >> - The require hostname fix >> - upgrade-fix-v3ResetMetaVolSize-argument >> - lvm-Do-not-use-udev-cache-for-obtaining-device-list >> - Fix-ballooning-rules-for-computing-the-minimum-avail >> - Avoid-M2Crypto-races >> - spec-declare-we-provide-an-existing-python-cpopen >> - configuring-selinux-allowing-qemu-kvm-to-generate-co >> >> @Mike, can you please update the testing candidate repo? >> > > Packages updated in beta repo > Thanks for the new builds. I will try them tomorrow. Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On 12.11.2013 11:31, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> >> sorry for this rant, but... >> >> I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't >> even be installed in the most times. > > I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to > http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing ? Will do. I just finished migrating an old 3.1 el6 installation to a fresh 3.3.1. -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On 11/12/2013 03:51 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: Hi Patrick, On 11/12/2013 09:33 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: Hi all, sorry for this rant, but... Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished. We must improve in the points you have raised. I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't even be installed in the most times. I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing ? One time it required a future selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been answered by others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build. We would appreciate if you could continue the tests with the new test build: F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172359 F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172521 EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172612 This last update includes the following patches: - The require hostname fix - upgrade-fix-v3ResetMetaVolSize-argument - lvm-Do-not-use-udev-cache-for-obtaining-device-list - Fix-ballooning-rules-for-computing-the-minimum-avail - Avoid-M2Crypto-races - spec-declare-we-provide-an-existing-python-cpopen - configuring-selinux-allowing-qemu-kvm-to-generate-co @Mike, can you please update the testing candidate repo? Packages updated in beta repo Thanks! ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 04:41:53PM +, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote: > > > > > > > > - Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we > > > should update > > > http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages > > > accordingly - and more importantly, make that version available. > > > > > > Sandro, who built the python-pep8-1.4.6 that sits on the el6 Jenkins > > > slave? Could you make it publicly available? (I can volunteer > > > http://danken.fedorapeople.org again) > > > > i tend to agree here with patrick on using non released pep8 packages, that > > are not available > > via rpms, but only via python-pip. > > the jenkins slaves were updated via pyhon-pip and not via yum upgrade. > > Eyal, I do not understand your opinion here... In any case, I've added > http://danken.fedorapeople.org/python-pep8-1.4.5-2.el6.noarch.rpm if > anyone find this unsigned unsupported hardly tested package useful. A concerned user just asked me how did I build this. I just took the source from koji, http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/python-pep8/1.4.5/2.fc20/src/python-pep8-1.4.5-2.fc20.src.rpm and built it on an el6 host with http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/python-sphinx/1.0.8/1.el6/noarch/python-sphinx-1.0.8-1.el6.noarch.rpm installed. Dan. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Hi Patrick, On 11/12/2013 09:33 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: Hi all, sorry for this rant, but... Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished. We must improve in the points you have raised. I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't even be installed in the most times. I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing ? One time it required a future selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? Indeed, that's bad. It has been included from a patch only on Fedora koji build rawhide. The others points here already have been answered by others developers. Anyway, we have updated the build. We would appreciate if you could continue the tests with the new test build: F19: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172359 F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172521 EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6172612 This last update includes the following patches: - The require hostname fix - upgrade-fix-v3ResetMetaVolSize-argument - lvm-Do-not-use-udev-cache-for-obtaining-device-list - Fix-ballooning-rules-for-computing-the-minimum-avail - Avoid-M2Crypto-races - spec-declare-we-provide-an-existing-python-cpopen - configuring-selinux-allowing-qemu-kvm-to-generate-co @Mike, can you please update the testing candidate repo? Thanks! -- Cheers Douglas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote: > > > > > - There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec > > requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days? > > it does run, but we can't enable it since it's still failing: > http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_3.3_install_rpm_sanity_gerrit/label=fedora19/282/console > > once that's fixed, the job will be enabled and run per patch. Yaniv, any idea why we still have file /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cpopen/__init__.py from install of vdsm-python-cpopen-4.12.1-4.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package python-cpopen-1.2.3-2.fc19.x86_64 ? > > > > > - Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we > > should update > > http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages > > accordingly - and more importantly, make that version available. > > > > Sandro, who built the python-pep8-1.4.6 that sits on the el6 Jenkins > > slave? Could you make it publicly available? (I can volunteer > > http://danken.fedorapeople.org again) > > i tend to agree here with patrick on using non released pep8 packages, that > are not available > via rpms, but only via python-pip. > the jenkins slaves were updated via pyhon-pip and not via yum upgrade. Eyal, I do not understand your opinion here... In any case, I've added http://danken.fedorapeople.org/python-pep8-1.4.5-2.el6.noarch.rpm if anyone find this unsigned unsupported hardly tested package useful. Dan. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] ovirt host on amazon
Hi, I don't think it's possible as Amazon is already a virtualized environment. Nested KVM would be possible but as I understand Amazon AWS is running on Xen. Same answer is given here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14193821/run-kvm-on-top-of-amazon-ec2-possible Kind regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae B.V. -Original Message- From: "Uche Okonkwo" To: users@ovirt.org Date: 12/11/2013 17:35 Subject: [Users] ovirt host on amazon hello users, i think this software is great but there is something i am yet to see. i am wondering if we can have our ovirt hosts on amazon , thereby creating a hybrid set up. can ovirt hosts/ custer be on amazon ? pockey ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] [Bug] 3.3.1. Beta Create VM does not work with VNC / Linux VM
Hi, we just discovered a bug in ovirt-engine 3.3.1 beta from ovirt.org repo: You can't create a VM (via webadmin) with the following options: set VM-Name select Operating System: "Other Linux", "Linux", or any Linux distro click: "Show advanced options" switch: console: protocol: from SPICE to VNC Hit "Ok" receive the following error in webadmin gui: "Error while executing action: bug1: Cannot add VM. Cannot set single display device via VNC display." (bug1 is the vm-name) workaround1: select "other os" or any windows version and the setup works with vnc workaround2: select spice as protocol I created a BZ for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029584 I suggest this bug as a blocker for 3.3.1. release -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] need help for ovirt site disaster recovery
i want to configure site disaster recvery in ovirt environment. do you have idea about site disaster recovery in ovirt? (any pdf or link for this concept) thanks ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] ovirt host on amazon
hello users, i think this software is great but there is something i am yet to see. i am wondering if we can have our ovirt hosts on amazon , thereby creating a hybrid set up. can ovirt hosts/ custer be on amazon ? pockey ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
- Original Message - > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" > To: "Sandro Bonazzola" , dc...@redhat.com > Cc: "vdsm-devel" , "oVirt Mailing List" > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:33:44 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > sorry for this rant, but... > > Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished. > We must improve in the points you have raised. > > > > > > > I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't > > > even be installed in the most times. > > > > I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to > > http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing ? > > > > > One time it required a future > > > selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much > > > lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires > > > "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not > > > included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? > > > Anyway. So I proceeded and tried to build vdsm myself once again. > > > Currently the build fails with (but worked fine some days ago): > > > > > > /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename > > > '*.py,*.py.in' \ > > > client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests > > > vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf > > > vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg > > > vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 > > > continuation line under-indented for visual indent > > > > > > > > > - How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating > > > to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to > > > broken vdsm rpms. > > I suspect you are not interested in "excuses" for each of the failures, > let us look forwards. My conclusions are: > - Do not require non-yet-existing rpms. If we require a feature that is > not yet in Fedora/Centos, we must wait. This is already in effect, see > for example http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/20248/ and > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/19545 > > - There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec > requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days? it does run, but we can't enable it since it's still failing: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_3.3_install_rpm_sanity_gerrit/label=fedora19/282/console once that's fixed, the job will be enabled and run per patch. > > - Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we > should update > http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages > accordingly - and more importantly, make that version available. > > Sandro, who built the python-pep8-1.4.6 that sits on the el6 Jenkins > slave? Could you make it publicly available? (I can volunteer > http://danken.fedorapeople.org again) i tend to agree here with patrick on using non released pep8 packages, that are not available via rpms, but only via python-pip. the jenkins slaves were updated via pyhon-pip and not via yum upgrade. > > > > - How are the builds prepared? Is there a Jenkins job that prepares > > > "stable" rpms in addition to the nightly job? Or is this totally > > > handcrafted? no jenkins job for stable builds. just nightly builds published from this job which build only rpms from master. http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Packaging/job/vdsm_create_rpms/ > > > - How can it be that the rpm spec differs between the 3.3 branch and > > > released rpms? What is the source/branch for el6 vdsm rpms? Maybe I'm > > > just tracking on the wrong source tree... > > Based on your reports, you are tracking the correct tree; but please > describe which differences do you see (and between what releases > exactly). > > Regards, > Dan. > ___ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Live storage migration snapshot removal (fails)
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sander Grendelman wrote: > Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029069 The patch at http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/19983/ from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015071 seems to fix this issue. I could not patch storage/image.py in our main environment so I had a nice exercise in building an oVirt environment on top of nested KVM virtualization on my laptop. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Ovirt 3.3 removing disk failure
When I try to remove viritual disk from ovirt engine I get error "User admin@internal finished removing disk test_vm with storage failure in domain DATA_DOMAIN." VM itself was running fine with no errors. DATA_DOMAIN is GlusterFS replicated volume (on ovirt host). ovirt engine comp (fc19) ovirt-engine.noarch 3.3.0.1-1.fc19 ovirt host (fc19) vdsm.x86_644.12.1-4.fc19 vdsm-gluster.noarch4.12.1-4.fc19 glusterfs-server.x86_643.4.1-1.fc19 tnx for help ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Default route on hosts
On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:58 AM, Assaf Muller wrote: > Can users outside of the hosts' networks reach the VMs in the hosts? I have not tested this yet. I have been focused on the host's networking behavior outside of the ovirt/vdsm bits. (Mainly, it checking in on other things.) I realize this presents a flaw in my thinking that the host was not behaving properly. I will adjust my thinking on this item, and then test with a valid set of criteria. > If you use netstat -rn it is expected that the gateway will be 0.0.0.0, as > ifcfg-ovirtmgmt has DEFROUTE=yes and ifcfg-public has DEFROUTE=no, then > ovirtmgmt's > 'gateway' (0.0.0.0) will be determined as the host's default gateway. However > with the new multiple gateways feature we configure source routing to make > sure that traffic that comes (from the outside) in the public network's > device will return the way it came in. That makes a lot of sense to me now. And, actually, I believe is the way it is working, the more I think about the behavior I'm seeing. > You can use 'ip rule' to see the rules VDSM configures. It creates two rules > and a routing table per device. You can use 'ip route show table %s' on each > table, where the IDs can be obtained by 'ip rule'. This is super helpful. Thank you. A large part of this is likely me needing to adjust my thinking. As long as my VM's are behaving as expected, do I actually need the host to, by default, send traffic out the 'public' interface? If I do, what traffic is that? Can I change that traffic? The likely hood is that there are only a small amount of data, mostly centering around metrics, and some config management, that would be host sourced data that currently isn't destined for my management network. Maybe those data *should* run over the management network, if my desire for an extra layer of protection of those data is a valid desire. Of course, that's not the way I have things arranged right now, but, maybe I can fix that. Thank you very much for your help, I have enough information to get back on the problem now. --Chris ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > > > sorry for this rant, but... Thanks for ranting. Community testing and ranting are to be cherished. We must improve in the points you have raised. > > > > I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't > > even be installed in the most times. > > I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to > http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing ? > > > One time it required a future > > selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much > > lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires > > "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not > > included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? > > Anyway. So I proceeded and tried to build vdsm myself once again. > > Currently the build fails with (but worked fine some days ago): > > > > /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' \ > > client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests > > vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf > > vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg > > vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 > > continuation line under-indented for visual indent > > > > > > - How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating > > to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to > > broken vdsm rpms. I suspect you are not interested in "excuses" for each of the failures, let us look forwards. My conclusions are: - Do not require non-yet-existing rpms. If we require a feature that is not yet in Fedora/Centos, we must wait. This is already in effect, see for example http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/20248/ and http://gerrit.ovirt.org/19545 - There's a Jenkins job to enforce the former requirement of spec requirement. David, Sandro, any idea why it is not running these days? - Keep the docs updated. Our Jenkins slaves have pep8-1.4.6, so we should update http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers#Installing_required_packages accordingly - and more importantly, make that version available. Sandro, who built the python-pep8-1.4.6 that sits on the el6 Jenkins slave? Could you make it publicly available? (I can volunteer http://danken.fedorapeople.org again) > > - How are the builds prepared? Is there a Jenkins job that prepares > > "stable" rpms in addition to the nightly job? Or is this totally > > handcrafted? > > - How can it be that the rpm spec differs between the 3.3 branch and > > released rpms? What is the source/branch for el6 vdsm rpms? Maybe I'm > > just tracking on the wrong source tree... Based on your reports, you are tracking the correct tree; but please describe which differences do you see (and between what releases exactly). Regards, Dan. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Default route on hosts
Can users outside of the hosts' networks reach the VMs in the hosts? If you use netstat -rn it is expected that the gateway will be 0.0.0.0, as ifcfg-ovirtmgmt has DEFROUTE=yes and ifcfg-public has DEFROUTE=no, then ovirtmgmt's 'gateway' (0.0.0.0) will be determined as the host's default gateway. However with the new multiple gateways feature we configure source routing to make sure that traffic that comes (from the outside) in the public network's device will return the way it came in. You can use 'ip rule' to see the rules VDSM configures. It creates two rules and a routing table per device. You can use 'ip route show table %s' on each table, where the IDs can be obtained by 'ip rule'. - Original Message - From: "Chris Geddings" To: "Assaf Muller" Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 2:26:40 PM Subject: Re: [Users] Default route on hosts On Nov 12, 2013, at 3:32 AM, Assaf Muller wrote: > oVirt 3.3 introduced a feature called multiple gateways which may assist you. > If you configured a gateway on the public network (Either statically via oVirt > or via DHCP), then all traffic into the hosts through their public network > NIC will be returned via that nic, *even though* the host's default gateway is > ovirtmgmt's gateway. > So, interestingly or not, when I define a gateway on the public interface (through the web management interface or DHCP), and I don't worry about making the DEFROUTE=yes setting in my "public" network, the box behaves like it has an incorrect default route. Now, my management network has a gateway of 0.0.0.0, as it is a completely simple network, so that may be part of the problem. I'm not sure the impact of a 0.0.0.0 as a gateway. I'm not sure how to poke at this further to figure out where the breakage is. Routing looks like it has gotten a little more complex, and I'm still operating with 'netstat -rn' and 'route add foo' type commands. --Chris ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Bug: adding LocalStorage Data Centers
On 11/12/2013 06:37 AM, Sven Kieske wrote: Hi, done that. We encountered this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023739 we tested 3.3.1 from the beta ovirt.org repo. Could this bug fix please be included in 3.3.1 release? patch isn't small and 3.3.1 has been in beta/frozen for a while now (pending last vdsm issue). so i prefer this to wait to 3.3.2 (already fixed there) which beta should be available once we release 3.3.1. Am 12.11.2013 11:33, schrieb Sandro Bonazzola: Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Sven Kieske ha scritto: Hi, I'm currently setting up a fresh 3.3.1 from ovirt.org beta repo Hi, may I invite you to add yourself to http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Bug: adding LocalStorage Data Centers
Hi, done that. We encountered this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023739 we tested 3.3.1 from the beta ovirt.org repo. Could this bug fix please be included in 3.3.1 release? Am 12.11.2013 11:33, schrieb Sandro Bonazzola: > Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Sven Kieske ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> I'm currently setting up a fresh 3.3.1 from ovirt.org beta repo > > Hi, may I invite you to add yourself to > http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing? > -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] [vdsm] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Hey Patrick, For the pep8 issue, as mentioned you should check pep8 --version and use 1.4.6. If you use older version, just upgrade with python-pip (yum install python-pip , and then `pip-install install pep8 --upgrade`) Second, try to follow http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers , it specifies the repositories you need to set (which should solve and selinux-policy package you miss) and should be the same for ovirt-3.3. About the hostname issue, can you detail more about the issue .. I'm not familiar with such error There are some differences between ovirt-3.3 branch and master in the requirements scope, each with specific reason. you should checkout ovirt-3.3 branch and not ovirt-3.3.0 for those tests We are working on the quality and constantly trying to increase and improve the software. About the builds process you can talk with eedri for more details Regards, Yaniv Bronhaim. - Original Message - > From: "Sandro Bonazzola" > To: "patrick hurrelmann" , "oVirt Mailing > List" , "vdsm-devel" > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:31:04 PM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms > > Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > > > sorry for this rant, but... > > > > I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't > > even be installed in the most times. > > I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to > http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing ? > > > One time it required a future > > selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much > > lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires > > "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not > > included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? > > Anyway. So I proceeded and tried to build vdsm myself once again. > > Currently the build fails with (but worked fine some days ago): > > > > /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' > > \ > > client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests > > vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf > > vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg > > vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 > > continuation line under-indented for visual indent > > > > > > - How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating > > to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to > > broken vdsm rpms. > > - How are the builds prepared? Is there a Jenkins job that prepares > > "stable" rpms in addition to the nightly job? Or is this totally > > handcrafted? > > - How can it be that the rpm spec differs between the 3.3 branch and > > released rpms? What is the source/branch for el6 vdsm rpms? Maybe I'm > > just tracking on the wrong source tree... > > Since this is VDSM related, adding vdsm-devel list to the discussion. > > > > > > Thx and Regards > > Patrick > > > > > > > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com > ___ > vdsm-devel mailing list > vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Bug: adding LocalStorage Data Centers
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Sven Kieske ha scritto: > Hi, > > I'm currently setting up a fresh 3.3.1 from ovirt.org beta repo Hi, may I invite you to add yourself to http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing? > > I just wanted to say that maybe more people would test from ovirt.org > repo if the download speed could get bumped up somewhat: > > yum install ovirt-engine > --- > Total > >190 kB/s | 305 MB 27:21 > > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: > Hi all, > > sorry for this rant, but... > > I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't > even be installed in the most times. I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing ? > One time it required a future > selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much > lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires > "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not > included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? > Anyway. So I proceeded and tried to build vdsm myself once again. > Currently the build fails with (but worked fine some days ago): > > /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' \ > client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests > vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf > vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg > vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 > continuation line under-indented for visual indent > > > - How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating > to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to > broken vdsm rpms. > - How are the builds prepared? Is there a Jenkins job that prepares > "stable" rpms in addition to the nightly job? Or is this totally > handcrafted? > - How can it be that the rpm spec differs between the 3.3 branch and > released rpms? What is the source/branch for el6 vdsm rpms? Maybe I'm > just tracking on the wrong source tree... Since this is VDSM related, adding vdsm-devel list to the discussion. > > Thx and Regards > Patrick > > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
On 12.11.2013 11:07, Assaf Muller wrote: > Regarding the pep8 breakage - Try updating your pep8. > Hi, thanks for the hint, but according to http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers the latest python-pep8 (python-pep8-1.3.3-3.el6) for el6 is already installed. And further digging shows that probably http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/21055/ was not yet merged to 3.3. Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Regarding the pep8 breakage - Try updating your pep8. - Original Message - From: "Patrick Hurrelmann" To: "oVirt Mailing List" Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:34:20 AM Subject: [Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms Hi all, sorry for this rant, but... I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't even be installed in the most times. One time it required a future selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? Anyway. So I proceeded and tried to build vdsm myself once again. Currently the build fails with (but worked fine some days ago): /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' \ client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent - How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to broken vdsm rpms. - How are the builds prepared? Is there a Jenkins job that prepares "stable" rpms in addition to the nightly job? Or is this totally handcrafted? - How can it be that the rpm spec differs between the 3.3 branch and released rpms? What is the source/branch for el6 vdsm rpms? Maybe I'm just tracking on the wrong source tree... Thx and Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Bug: adding LocalStorage Data Centers
Hi, I'm currently setting up a fresh 3.3.1 from ovirt.org beta repo I just wanted to say that maybe more people would test from ovirt.org repo if the download speed could get bumped up somewhat: yum install ovirt-engine --- Total 190 kB/s | 305 MB 27:21 -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Low quality of el6 vdsm rpms
Hi all, sorry for this rant, but... I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't even be installed in the most times. One time it required a future selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? Anyway. So I proceeded and tried to build vdsm myself once again. Currently the build fails with (but worked fine some days ago): /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' \ client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent - How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to broken vdsm rpms. - How are the builds prepared? Is there a Jenkins job that prepares "stable" rpms in addition to the nightly job? Or is this totally handcrafted? - How can it be that the rpm spec differs between the 3.3 branch and released rpms? What is the source/branch for el6 vdsm rpms? Maybe I'm just tracking on the wrong source tree... Thx and Regards Patrick -- Lobster LOGsuite GmbH, Münchner Straße 15a, D-82319 Starnberg HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Default route on hosts
Hi Christopher, Your understanding of the terms is correct. A small clarification - Hosts are mostly referred to as nodes when running oVirt Node, a custom Linux distribution purposely made to be used as a host in oVirt. As for your question: DEFROUTE=yes/no in the hosts' ifcfg files control the default gateway of the host. Currently, by design, the management network's gateway (Which sounds like your management network doesn't have?) will be kept as the host's default gateway. This was done to make sure that the engine maintains connectivity to its hosts. oVirt 3.3 introduced a feature called multiple gateways which may assist you. If you configured a gateway on the public network (Either statically via oVirt or via DHCP), then all traffic into the hosts through their public network NIC will be returned via that nic, *even though* the host's default gateway is ovirtmgmt's gateway. To clarify further: The current behavior is that the host's default gateway is ovirtmgmt's gateway. This controls traffic originating from *within* the host such as communications with storage. Incoming traffic, however, such as traffic originating from users from outside of the datacenter, will be returned via the device that the traffic came in on. If that doesn't work for you, and you feel like you need to control the host's default gateway via oVirt, then please file an RFE. I can't guarantee a timeline or that it will ultimately make it in the product, but the RFE will be carefully taken into account when designing future versions. - Original Message - From: "Christopher Geddings" To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 8:40:33 PM Subject: [Users] Default route on hosts Before I ask my question, I want to make sure I'm using the right terms: engine == the system that manages the ovirt environment. Runs the web interface, etc host(s) == the physical machine(s) the engine uses to deploy virtual machines on. Sometimes referenced as a node? vm(s) == the guest systems that are controlled by the engine and run on the hosts, that do the stuff you present to the world at large, whatever your world at large would be. Is that correct? In my environment, I have a customer facing network and another network that's on a set of isolated switches. I desire to use the isolated network as the management network, and am naming the other network "public" in the web management interface. In the interface, I see these labeled as ovirtmgmt and public, for the management network (private) and the customer facing network (public). >From what I can tell from poking at the configuration files, and from a couple >references in other threads, the 'DEFROUTE' setting in the ifcfg-* files gets set to 'yes' only for the ovirtmgmt network, not for any other bridged network. I can override this by hand as I deploy hosts, but am hoping for a way to do so within the ovirt management framework, so I have less bits that can go wrong. Is there a way for me to get the DEFROUTE set to no for the ovirtmgmt interface and to yes on the public interface as I deploy hosts? Is there a reason I'm not seeing for avoiding this behavior? --Chris ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Bug: adding LocalStorage Data Centers
Hi Maor, that's interesting. Honestly, I don't remember the exact paths, but I think we did setup everything "the standard way" :). A colleague of mine tries to reproduce this again, this time with a newer engine version. Will this patchset get included in 3.3.1? We would like to give it a shot, but can't spend the time to build ovirt-engine from scratch with this patch. Maybe someone can provide a nightly build? Am 11.11.2013 18:17, schrieb Maor Lipchuk: > Hi Sven, > What is the path of the third local storage domain you can't add. > Could it be the same as the other existing connections (/home/DATA, > /data/images/rhev)? > > It could be an issue of this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1023739 - - > Cannot create same Local SD path on different Hosts > > Regards, > Maor -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
