Re: [ovirt-users] FC19 - Transaction check error - while installing ovirt-engine
I am seeing this on upgrade as well. So far I have not found a solution. On Mon 21 Apr 2014 12:48:20 AM PDT, Udaya Kiran P wrote: Hi, I am trying to install oVirt-Engine on Fedora-19. I am getting the below transaction check error while executing 'yum -y install ovirt-engine' command. Please help me resolve this. Transaction check error: file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/postgresql.py conflicts between attempted installs of ovirt-log-collector-3.4.1-1.fc19.noarch and sos-3.0-23.fc19.noarch file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/postgresql.pyc conflicts between attempted installs of ovirt-log-collector-3.4.1-1.fc19.noarch and sos-3.0-23.fc19.noarch file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sos/plugins/postgresql.pyo conflicts between attempted installs of ovirt-log-collector-3.4.1-1.fc19.noarch and sos-3.0-23.fc19.noarch I have used ovirt repo - yum localinstall http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release.noarch.rpm ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [ovirt-users] FC19 - Transaction check error - while installing ovirt-engine
Ok, I managed to update with: yum --exclude=sos/* update I am seeing this on upgrade as well. So far I have not found a solution. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] new oVirt look-and-feel -- feature page
On 02/18/2014 01:19 PM, Greg Sheremeta wrote: Hi, Please check out the feature page for the new oVirt look-and-feel, PatternFly based: http://www.ovirt.org/Features/NewLookAndFeelPatternFlyPhase1. Comments are welcome. Comments, take them, hate them, whatever: The downloads seem to be too prominent on the first screen, my eyes are drawn to it instead of the portals. This may be due to the circle in the background drawing attention. The 404 page click here to continue, continue to where? Maybe should be Click here to return home? The login page would ideally have an identifying mark of which portal it is for. The horizontal scroll is disappointing on the user portal. I don't think Number of cores should be larger than ALL other headings on the page. Good work, excited to see it. - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] noVNC https certs
On 01/13/2014 09:50 AM, Neil Schulz wrote: So, this is the only way to stop having to accept the cert? I'd have to tell all our clients to download and install that cert to their workstation? No. You can replace the Websocket Proxy certs referenced by /etc/ovirt-engine/ovirt-websocket-proxy.conf.d/10-setup.conf The websocket proxy needs a combined certificate file with your cert and the entire chain for SSL_CERTIFICATE SSL_KEY is just the unencrypted key, and it MUST be accessible by the ovirt user. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] noVNC https certs
I downloaded the ca.crt for the server. I went into Settings Show advance settings... Manage Certificates... Import The cert appeared under the tabs. I closed and restarted my browser, navigated back to the ovirt engine page, launched noVNC and received Server disconnected (code: 1006) Should be: Manage Certificates... Authorities Tab Import Regardless, installing your own certificate is preferred. You don't even have to buy one, you can get as many basic one year certs as you need for free from startcom. - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] simple networking?
On 11/27/2013 09:18 AM, Ted Miller wrote: I am trying to set up a testing network using o-virt, but the networking is refusing to cooperate. I am testing for possible use in two different production setups. My previous experience has been with VMWare. I have always set up a single bridged network on each host. All my hosts, VMs, and non-VM computers were peers on the LAN. They could all talk to each other, and things worked very well. There was a firewall/gateway that provided access to the Internet, and hosts, VMs, and could all communicate with the Internet as needed. o-virt seems to be compartmentalizing things beyond all reason. Is there any way to set up simple networking, so ALL computers can see each other? Is there anywhere that describes the philosophy behind the networking setup? What reason is there that networks are so divided? After banging my head against the wall trying to configure just one host, I am very frustrated. I have spent several HOURS Googling for a coherent explanation of how/why networking is supposed to work, but only fine obscure references like letting non-VMs see VM traffic would be a huge security violation. I have no concept of what king of an installation the o-virt designers have in mind, but it is obviously worlds different from what I am trying to do. The best I can tell, o-virt networking works like this (at least when you have only one NIC): there must be an ovirtmgt network, which cannot be combined with any other network. the ovirtmgt network cannot talk to VMs (unless that VM is running the engine) the ovirtmgt network can only talk to hosts, not to other non-VM computers a VM network can talk only to VMs cannot talk to hosts cannot talk to non-VMs hosts cannot talk to my LAN hosts cannot talk to VMs VMs cannot talk to my LAN All of the above are enforced by a boatload of firewall rules that o-virt puts into every host and VM under its jurisdiction. All of the above is inferred from things I Googled, because I can't find anywhere that explains what or how things are supposed to work--only things telling people WHAT THEY CANT DO. All I see on the mailing lists is people getting their hands slapped because they are trying to do SIMPLE SETUPS that should work, but don't (due to either design restrictions or software bugs). My use case A: * My (2 or 3) hosts have only one physical NIC. * My VMs exist to provide services to non-VM computers. * The VMs do not run X-windows, but they provide GUI programs to non-VMs via ssh -X connections. * MY VMs need access to storage that is shared with hosts and non-VMs on the LAN. Is there some way to TURN OFF network control in o-virt? My systems are small and static. I can hand-configure the networking a whole lot easier than I can deal with o-virt (as I have used it so far). Mostly I would need to be able to turn off the firewall rules on both hosts and VMs. banging head against wall, Ted ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users Odd, All my VMs/Hosts (They also only have one nic) can talk to each other and I don't see any rules trying to prevent this in iptables. Also, unless there is some feature I don't know about, ovirt doesn't screw with VM internals. My ovirtmgt network is the same as my main network. ¯\(°_°)/¯ - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Building ovirt-guest-agent is destroying my VM!
Honestly this does not sound like an issue to me which is caused by Python or the build of the guest agent I would start looking into the logs for the Host. Shot in the dark, but I would also check the memory usage on the host and how over provisioned you are. If the host started paging significantly it could become unresponsive. - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Fedora 20
If I am not mistaken, the EL6 builds do not support native Gluster, which in his case may be nice to have. - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Guest Agent
On 11/25/2013 04:44 AM, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote: On 11/25/2013 01:38 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote: On 11/25/2013 01:09 PM, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote: On 11/25/2013 12:54 PM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: If you had rhev-guest-agent installed before, then manually remove the user rhevagent and group rhevagent before installing ovirt-guest-agent. the ovirt-guest-agent reuses the same uid and gid, but fails to add them upon install when the rhev user and group is still existing. Ah yeah that explains it. Well I am not sure if the workaround for this is appropriate in the rpm. I think that should be fixed on the system, it's not really expected that someone would be 'upgrading' from the rhev-agent it's not really expected that someone would be 'upgrading' from the rhev-agent to the ovirt-guest-agent. Regards Patrick Patrick was right Having before installed and then removed rhev-agent to test ovirt-agent I still had: passwd rhevagent:x:175:175:RHEV Agent:/:/sbin/nologin ovirtagent:x:175:175:oVirt Guest Agent:/:/sbin/nologin group rhevagent:x:175: So after removing ovirt-guest-agent and userdel ovirtagent groupdel rhevagent verified no more entries and reinstalled ovirt-guest-agent, now only passwd ovirtagent:x:175:175:oVirt Guest Agent:/:/sbin/nologin group ovirtagent:x:175: [root@c510 ~]# service ovirt-guest-agent start Starting ovirt-guest-agent:[ OK ] [root@c510 ~]# service ovirt-guest-agent status ovirt-guest-agent (pid 3527) is running... Only entry in log file: MainThread::INFO::2013-11-25 13:30:29,676::ovirt-guest-agent::37::root::Starting oVirt guest agent and I'm able to see again IP, installed applications, ecc for the VM So the rpm itself seems ok. Eventually it could be useful to verify no rhev-agent package exist and no other user/group with same id. Should it considered a standard way of proceeding to delete user group or not in general? Because in this case as a post-uninstall step could be safe to remove them. Usually you don't remove groups and users in rpms. It's actually mentioned in the Fedora Packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups#Allocation_Strategies Quote: *Do not remove users or groups* **We never remove users or groups created by packages. There's no sane way to check if files owned by those users/groups are left behind (and even if there would, what would we do with them?) and leaving those behind with ownerships **pointing to now nonexistent users/groups may result in security issues when a semantically unrelated user/group is created later and reuses the UID/GID. Also, in some setups deleting the user/group might not be possible or/nor desirable **(eg. when using a shared, remote user/group database). Cleanup of unused users/groups is left to the system administrators to take care of if they so desire. Thanks, Gianluca Why not just reuse the rhev-agent username, it is what it is reserved as? Then just add a conflict with the rhev RPM so they cannot be installed together. Though upgrading systems using ovirt-guest-agent username would be tricky. - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Guest Agent
Why not just reuse the rhev-agent username, it is what it is reserved as? Then just add a conflict with the rhev RPM so they cannot be installed together. Actually, looking at the spec file. The user is added with the -o option (Allow non-unique). If you added -o to groupadd then the problem should go away and was probably the original intent of the spec file writer. getent group ovirtagent /dev/null || groupadd -r -g 175 ovirtagent to getent group ovirtagent /dev/null || groupadd -r -g 175 -o ovirtagent Still needs conflict with rhev agent though. -Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Guest Agent
On 11/22/2013 10:53 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 11/22/2013 05:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
i guess no one asked for one till now so its not built.
I knew I was the last one on earth supporting RHEL5.
rhev does have a rhev-guest-agent for .el5, supported and all.
i just don't remember we heard anyone asking for this in the ovirt
community.
Not tried yet myself, but I think you can download related source rpm
here and try to rebuld:
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/
HIH,
Gianluca
Just rebuilt rhev-agent-2.3.16-3.el5.src.rpm on a CentOS 5.10 x86_64
VM on oVirt 3.3.1-2.fc19 and the agent seems to work.
In the sense that:
- I get VM ip in web gui
- I get list of applications in web gui:
Installed Applications
kernel-2.6.18-371.1.2.el5
kernel-2.6.18-371.el5
rhev-agent-2.3.16-3
xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.0.12-2.el5
- when there is activity, I see memory,cpu and network usage rows with
consistent values
Other things to verify?
I don't think the .el5 one has any SSO in it, so i think this covers it.
Alright so far so good. I setup a jenkins job to build this for me. So
far working like a dream.
wget
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/rhev-agent-2.3.16-3.el5.src.rpm
mkdir -p build/{BUILD,RPMS,SOURCES,SPECS,SRPMS}
rpmbuild --define _topdir $WORKSPACE/build --rebuild
rhev-agent-2.3.16-3.el5.src.rpm
Any chance of an 'official' build ending up in the EPEL for anyone else
who may desire this?
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Guest Agent
I think I may have stumbled on a bug. On a RHEL6 guest I got MainThread::ERROR::2013-11-21 17:18:17,290::ovirt-guest-agent::117::root::Unhandled exception in oVirt guest agent! Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/ovirt-guest-agent/ovirt-guest-agent.py, line 111, in module agent.run(daemon, pidfile) File /usr/share/ovirt-guest-agent/ovirt-guest-agent.py, line 42, in run self.agent = LinuxVdsAgent(config) File /usr/share/ovirt-guest-agent/GuestAgentLinux2.py, line 324, in __init__ AgentLogicBase.__init__(self, config) File /usr/share/ovirt-guest-agent/OVirtAgentLogic.py, line 90, in __init__ self.vio = VirtIoChannel(config.get(virtio, device)) File /usr/share/ovirt-guest-agent/VirtIoChannel.py, line 125, in __init__ self._vport = os.open(vport_name, os.O_RDWR) OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/virtio-ports/com.redhat.rhevm.vdsm' Sure enough, there is only org.qemu.guest_agent.0 in there. Halted the VM and started it again and then it was all shiny with com.redhat.rhevm.vdsm com.redhat.spice.0 org.qemu.guest_agent.0 Not the end of the world, but though I should mention it. - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Guest Agent
Ok, so what about an el5 guest agent? The github repo https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-guest-agent hints at there being support for el5, but it is incompatible with the automake version in el5. Is there a prebuilt rpm somewhere that I am missing? -- Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Guest Agent
On 11/21/2013 05:08 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 11/22/2013 03:04 AM, Thomas Suckow wrote: Ok, so what about an el5 guest agent? The github repo https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-guest-agent hints at there being support for el5, but it is incompatible with the automake version in el5. Is there a prebuilt rpm somewhere that I am missing? -- Thomas i guess no one asked for one till now so its not built. I knew I was the last one on earth supporting RHEL5. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Guest Agent
I am running several RHEL6 vms in ovirt. I am looking to install the guest agent. The releases repo has ovirt-guest-agent-common and EPEL has ovirt-guest-agent. Which of these should I use? How is this distinct from qemu-guest-agent? If I were to install an Ubuntu vm, what should I do about the guest agent? - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Guest Agent
On 11/21/2013 12:33 PM, Itamar Heim wrote: On 11/21/2013 08:27 PM, Thomas Suckow wrote: I am running several RHEL6 vms in ovirt. I am looking to install the guest agent. The releases repo has ovirt-guest-agent-common and EPEL has ovirt-guest-agent. Which of these should I use? I see in the release repo: ovirt-guest-agent-1.0.8-1.el6.noarch.rpm http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3/rpm/EL/6Server/noarch/ ? I'm an idiot. There is totally ovirt-guest-agent. I am still going to use the EPEL since for some reason the ovirt el6 repo is being wierd on my system (404 error). Probably the corporate proxy. How is this distinct from qemu-guest-agent? qemu-guest-agent is a newcomer. ovirt uses some functionality from qemu-guest-agent, and for what's not covered by qemu-guest-agent, uses ovirt-guest-agent. Cool If I were to install an Ubuntu vm, what should I do about the guest agent? use this: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-September/016308.html I'll keep that in mind. Many thanks, even if I was chasing my own tail. - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] replacing self-signed certificates
I don't know about the native SPICE client, but here is what I did for apache and the websocket proxy: In /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf it lists SSLCertificateFile SSLCertificateKeyFile SSLCertificateChainFile SSLCACertificateFile Those are the files you need to replace for the web interface. My certs were combined, so I actually only use SSLCertificateFile and SSLCertificateChainFile NOTE: If you modify ssl.conf, the path /etc/pki/ovirt-engine/apache-ca.pem is used by ovirt-iso-uploader. Uploads will fail unless you replace/symlink that file or specify a CA certificate on the command line. I actually linked to my chain file and it seems to be happy. Websocket Proxy: /etc/ovirt-engine/ovirt-websocket-proxy.conf.d/10-setup.conf defines the certificates. The websocket proxy needs a combined certificate file with your cert and the entire chain for SSL_CERTIFICATE SSL_KEY is just the unencrypted key, and it MUST be accessible by the ovirt user. As for spice, I am not sure, I am guessing it is /etc/pki/ovirt-engine/keys/engine_id_rsa and /etc/pki/ovirt-engine/keys/certs/engine.cer Not sure where they are referenced except by the websocket proxy. -- Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Minor HTML5 Spice Bug
I have been using the HTML5 Spice websocket plug-in and so far it works extremely well. I just have two comments/bugs about it. I look on the issue tracker and I did not see an appropriate component listed, so I will list them here: * When the virtual screen is resized (such as during boot when the GUI login is displayed) the mouse cursor gets messed up and clicking only clicks the upper left corner of the screen. * The SSL key has to be readable by the ovirt user rather than root *cough*. Maybe the proxy_wstunnel apache module could be of use to avoid SSL in the plugin. -- Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Docker -- self-sufficient application containers
On 10/25/2013 11:24 AM, David Sloane wrote: My understanding of Docker is that it provides a lighter-weight alternative to jboss or tomcat, but I'm not sure how much you would extend ovirt with a java application server. DS Docker is meant for binary applications, it virtualizes an os environment so that your application can run on almost any linux distro of the same architecture. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] noVNV : Just a Thank you
On 10/15/2013 02:57 AM, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote: Le 15/10/2013 10:51, Michal Skrivanek a écrit : Thanks!:) Did you try the SPICE version as well? I hadn't, but I just tried now, and I must have missed something to set up on the engine side, because even if I specify SPICE+HTML5, I just get a grey rounded empty rectangle. I don't know what I must install+setup on the engine server? I believe you just need to visit the spice proxy port it connects to via https in another tab/window (and accept the security warning) because it uses a self signed certificate and the browser will block the connection. - Thomas ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]
On 09/13/2013 10:24 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Suckow wrote: Everything was completely broken until I disabled NetworkManager, it seemed to be doing something with the bridge despite NM_MANAGED=no Donna if it was only a copy/paste typo, but just in ase the directive should be NM_CONTROLLED=no Gianluca That was a typo on my part while writing the email NM_CONTROLLED=no is what appears in ifcfg-ovirtmgmt ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]
On 09/04/2013 09:42 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: Hello, just in case someone else got this problem. For me it seems to be a naming convention problem. ifcfg file names did not match the shown interfaces. Steps to fix it included: - rename ifcfg-enp1s0, ... scripts to real interface names ifcfg-p49p1, ... - remove parameter NAME from these scripts - Switch to network service systemctl disable NetworkManager systemctl stop NetworkManager.service service network start chkconfig network on Markus Alright. So I just did a run through of installing All-in-one with the latest Release Candidate. Everything was completely broken until I disabled NetworkManager, it seemed to be doing something with the bridge despite NM_MANAGED=no systemctl disable NetworkManager systemctl stop NetworkManager.service network.service was already enabled, did nothing with it. I just deleted the ifcfg- file for the nic it managed, that seemed to work fine. I haven't rebooted much or put it through the paces yet, but this is a rather frustrating issue, especially since it hung engine-setup until I restored the network to working order. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Compliance problem with ovirt 3.3 on Fedora 19
On 09/13/2013 09:28 AM, Suckow, Thomas J wrote: On 09/13/2013 04:29 AM, Greg Sheremeta wrote: Did this get resolved? Is there a BZ? (I can't find one.) I am also seeing The Hosts emulated machines are UNKNOWN on yesterday's nightly build. The host I'm trying to add is a VM. [host2 $] vdsClient -s 0 getVdsCaps | grep emulatedMachines emulatedMachines = [] Greg I am uncertain if it did, I took down our production system (Low availability requirements) yesterday so I could fiddle with an all-in-one install trial today on another hard disk. I wonder if it is a certain hardware configuration, ours is an old Dell Precision. My previous attempt was normal install and then tried to add localhost. I wonder if the all in one would give different results. - Thomas I just finally got the All-In-One installed. It seems to be working. I noticed that the all-in-one set the CPU type in the cluster settings, you could try setting that... ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-09-11
On 09/11/2013 08:09 AM, Mike Burns wrote: * 3.3 release status (mburns, 14:03:53) * no open blockers at the moment, release just pending successful testi If you guys are looking for another tester of all-in-one before monday, I am willing to try in our environment on a clean install of F19. I would follow the instructions on http://www.ovirt.org/Feature/AllInOne Unless you have some other instructions you would like me to follow. I would just need to know where you would like me to acquire the ovirt-engine-setup-plugin-allinone rpm. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] OVirt-Engine 3.3 RC - Add Fedora 19 host fails [SOLVED]
I was also noticing needing to muck with the network interfaces and services during the beta. I find it interesting the need to disable NetworkManager and enable the legacy network service. I found no reference to this in the documentation for 3.3 and people seem to be installing it without issue. Maybe these people are just disabling it and not saying anything? - Thomas On 09/04/2013 09:42 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: Hello, just in case someone else got this problem. For me it seems to be a naming convention problem. ifcfg file names did not match the shown interfaces. Steps to fix it included: - rename ifcfg-enp1s0, ... scripts to real interface names ifcfg-p49p1, ... - remove parameter NAME from these scripts - Switch to network service systemctl disable NetworkManager systemctl stop NetworkManager.service service network start chkconfig network on Markus ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[Users] Compliance problem with ovirt 3.3 on Fedora 19
I attempted to setup and all-in-one solution on Fedora 19. I ran through the install which made a default data center and cluster. I created a host with 127.0.0.1 and then attempted to add the bridge that the test day documentation states does not get handled properly. After many reboots and disabling NetworkManager.service and enabling network.service as well as manually editing the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* files I had a network connection and reduced the errors that seem to be keeping my host in the Nonfunctional state to: Host Localhost does not comply with the cluster Default emulated machines. The Hosts emulated machines are UNKNOWN and the cluster is [rhel6.4.0, pc-1.0]} Recommendations of something I may be doing wrong? Has running 3.3 on F19 been a bad choice on my part? Bug? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Compliance problem with ovirt 3.3 on Fedora 19
The engine does not support localhost (loopback) as an address for network management. You have to use a real interface with real address. I did also try the systems real IP and it did not seem to change anything with regards to: The Hosts emulated machines are UNKNOWN and the cluster is [rhel6.4.0, pc-1.0]} You can also use fake interface to do so, such as dummy. modprobe dummy ifconfig dummy0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 I'll keep that in mind. May be useful for other things I want to do. Alon ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Re: [Users] Compliance problem with ovirt 3.3 on Fedora 19
Snippets of what seems possibly relevant: https://gist.github.com/thomassuckow/995f422cd5c46c6de98c messages seems mostly happy with the exception of a crash in /usr/bin/vdsm-tool related to ksmtuned, not sure if relevant The engine.log shows the error I mentioned before: ... Message: Host myhost does not comply with the cluster Default emulated machines. The Hosts emulated machines are UNKNOWN and the cluster is [rhel6.4.0, pc-1.0]} ... ... Message: State was set to NonOperational for host myhost ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
