Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2
just a remark: as long as i stay with the webinterface, calendar seems to be working fine but when i intermix with thunderbird actions via caldav it seems to be possible to produce inconsistent states - especially when a meeting is shifted, extended or shrinked. as i'm off for the rest of this week, i will further check this next week. calendar is essential for us. Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 3:50 PM From: "\"\\\"sg gs\\\"\" (s...@mail.com)" To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2 hello francis, v3.1.3.20160623-1 behaves well while v3.1.3 still seems to suffer from this weakness. best regards, gustav Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 at 9:33 PM From: "\"Francis Lachapelle\" (flachape...@inverse.ca)" To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2 Hello sggs > On Jun 17, 2016, at 9:36 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote: > > the same seems to be true for domo v3 demo @ sogo.nu ( http://demo.sogo.nu/SOGo/ ) > > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 at 10:02 AM > From: "\"\\\"sg gs\\\"\" (s...@mail.com)" > To: users@sogo.nu > Subject: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2 > hello again, > > in order to evaluate sogo v3.3.12, i created a second sogo instace using the same data (ldap,dovecot and prostgres) as the v2.3.12 instance. > > using v3.1.12, i am observing the following behaviour: > > 1. A creates a meeting and invites B > 2. B recieves an email and accepts the meeting > 3. A reopens the meeting and can see that B has accepted > 4. A clicks 'Edit' and saves the meeting without changing anything > 5. A reopens the meeting and B's accepted status has changed to 'not accepted' (?) > 6. B did not receive any meeting-related mail and sees his own status a 'not accepted'. > > this works different, more useful, in v2.3.12 > > moreover, if a resource was invited, it does not accept the invitation as it does in v2.3.12. > > what can i do to change this? did i miss anything? It's a bug which I just fixed¹. Thanks! Francis [1] https://github.com/inverse-inc/sogo/commit/8cc0b946e70f4a7643acfc4956a49b50c059f380 -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2
hello francis, v3.1.3.20160623-1 behaves well while v3.1.3 still seems to suffer from this weakness. best regards, gustav Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 at 9:33 PM From: "\"Francis Lachapelle\" (flachape...@inverse.ca)" To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2 Hello sggs > On Jun 17, 2016, at 9:36 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote: > > the same seems to be true for domo v3 demo @ sogo.nu ( http://demo.sogo.nu/SOGo/ ) > > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 at 10:02 AM > From: "\"\\\"sg gs\\\"\" (s...@mail.com)" > To: users@sogo.nu > Subject: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2 > hello again, > > in order to evaluate sogo v3.3.12, i created a second sogo instace using the same data (ldap,dovecot and prostgres) as the v2.3.12 instance. > > using v3.1.12, i am observing the following behaviour: > > 1. A creates a meeting and invites B > 2. B recieves an email and accepts the meeting > 3. A reopens the meeting and can see that B has accepted > 4. A clicks 'Edit' and saves the meeting without changing anything > 5. A reopens the meeting and B's accepted status has changed to 'not accepted' (?) > 6. B did not receive any meeting-related mail and sees his own status a 'not accepted'. > > this works different, more useful, in v2.3.12 > > moreover, if a resource was invited, it does not accept the invitation as it does in v2.3.12. > > what can i do to change this? did i miss anything? It's a bug which I just fixed¹. Thanks! Francis [1] https://github.com/inverse-inc/sogo/commit/8cc0b946e70f4a7643acfc4956a49b50c059f380 -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 3
setting canAuthenticate to YES for the resource in sogo.conf solved this issue -> https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3739 thanks to ludovic Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 at 1:32 PM From: "\"Christian Mack\" (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)" To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 3 Hello Am 19.06.2016 um 18:03 schrieb "sg gs" (s...@mail.com): > hello all, > using sogo v3.1.2 (or 3.1.2.20160619-1): if a resource is invited, it does not > accept the invitation as it does in v2.3.12. the resource configuration is the same. > should i change the resource configuration for v3.1.2? if yes, what is the > difference? what should i change? > There was no change to resources in V3. If it does not work, please open a bug report on http://www.sogo.nu/bugs .. -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 3
Hello Am 19.06.2016 um 18:03 schrieb "sg gs" (s...@mail.com): > hello all, > using sogo v3.1.2 (or 3.1.2.20160619-1): if a resource is invited, it does > not > accept the invitation as it does in v2.3.12. the resource configuration is > the same. > should i change the resource configuration for v3.1.2? if yes, what is the > difference? what should i change? > There was no change to resources in V3. If it does not work, please open a bug report on http://www.sogo.nu/bugs Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 3
hello all, using sogo v3.1.2 (or 3.1.2.20160619-1): if a resource is invited, it does not accept the invitation as it does in v2.3.12. the resource configuration is the same. should i change the resource configuration for v3.1.2? if yes, what is the difference? what should i change? tia, sggs -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2
Hello sggs > On Jun 17, 2016, at 9:36 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote: > > the same seems to be true for domo v3 demo @ sogo.nu ( > http://demo.sogo.nu/SOGo/ ) > > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 at 10:02 AM > From: "\"\\\"sg gs\\\"\" (s...@mail.com)" > To: users@sogo.nu > Subject: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2 > hello again, > > in order to evaluate sogo v3.3.12, i created a second sogo instace using the > same data (ldap,dovecot and prostgres) as the v2.3.12 instance. > > using v3.1.12, i am observing the following behaviour: > > 1. A creates a meeting and invites B > 2. B recieves an email and accepts the meeting > 3. A reopens the meeting and can see that B has accepted > 4. A clicks 'Edit' and saves the meeting without changing anything > 5. A reopens the meeting and B's accepted status has changed to 'not > accepted' (?) > 6. B did not receive any meeting-related mail and sees his own status a 'not > accepted'. > > this works different, more useful, in v2.3.12 > > moreover, if a resource was invited, it does not accept the invitation as it > does in v2.3.12. > > what can i do to change this? did i miss anything? It's a bug which I just fixed¹. Thanks! Francis [1] https://github.com/inverse-inc/sogo/commit/8cc0b946e70f4a7643acfc4956a49b50c059f380 -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2
the same seems to be true for domo v3 demo @ sogo.nu ( http://demo.sogo.nu/SOGo/ ) Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 at 10:02 AM From: "\"\\\"sg gs\\\"\" (s...@mail.com)" To: users@sogo.nu Subject: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2 hello again, in order to evaluate sogo v3.3.12, i created a second sogo instace using the same data (ldap,dovecot and prostgres) as the v2.3.12 instance. using v3.1.12, i am observing the following behaviour: 1. A creates a meeting and invites B 2. B recieves an email and accepts the meeting 3. A reopens the meeting and can see that B has accepted 4. A clicks 'Edit' and saves the meeting without changing anything 5. A reopens the meeting and B's accepted status has changed to 'not accepted' (?) 6. B did not receive any meeting-related mail and sees his own status a 'not accepted'. this works different, more useful, in v2.3.12 moreover, if a resource was invited, it does not accept the invitation as it does in v2.3.12. what can i do to change this? did i miss anything? best regards, sggs -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar / 2
hello again, in order to evaluate sogo v3.3.12, i created a second sogo instace using the same data (ldap,dovecot and prostgres) as the v2.3.12 instance. using v3.1.12, i am observing the following behaviour: 1. A creates a meeting and invites B 2. B recieves an email and accepts the meeting 3. A reopens the meeting and can see that B has accepted 4. A clicks 'Edit' and saves the meeting without changing anything 5. A reopens the meeting and B's accepted status has changed to 'not accepted' (?) 6. B did not receive any meeting-related mail and sees his own status a 'not accepted'. this works different, more useful, in v2.3.12 moreover, if a resource was invited, it does not accept the invitation as it does in v2.3.12. what can i do to change this? did i miss anything? best regards, sggs -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar
thanks a lot. Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 5:25 PM From: "\"Christian Mack\" (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)" To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar Hello Am 14.06.2016 um 16:38 schrieb "sg gs" (s...@mail.com): > hello, > when i reopen an existing and saved meeting with at least one attendee, navigate > to "Invite Attendees" and click on ok (without changing anything), always a > warning popup: 'A time conflict exists with one or more attendees. Would you > like to keep the current settings anyway?' appears. (seems, the meeting > conflicts with itself.) > is there anything i could do about it? did i miss anything? > Known bug: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2556 Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar
Hello Am 14.06.2016 um 16:38 schrieb "sg gs" (s...@mail.com): > hello, > when i reopen an existing and saved meeting with at least one attendee, > navigate > to "Invite Attendees" and click on ok (without changing anything), always a > warning popup: 'A time conflict exists with one or more attendees. Would you > like to keep the current settings anyway?' appears. (seems, the meeting > conflicts with itself.) > is there anything i could do about it? did i miss anything? > Known bug: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2556 Kind regards, Christian Mack -- Christian Mack Universität Konstanz Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) Abteilung Basisdienste 78457 Konstanz +49 7531 88-4416 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[SOGo] evaluating sogo - 2. calendar
hello, when i reopen an existing and saved meeting with at least one attendee, navigate to "Invite Attendees" and click on ok (without changing anything), always a warning popup: 'A time conflict exists with one or more attendees. Would you like to keep the current settings anyway?' appears. (seems, the meeting conflicts with itself.) is there anything i could do about it? did i miss anything? regards, sggs -- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
