Re: Must-Have Plugins?
Am 09.06.2015 um 05:03 schrieb Michael B Allen: So I have had SA running for about 2 days on a very small site with a handful of users. I've been running the default config just to see how well it would do by itself. Unfortunately quite a lot of spam is getting through. So far 40 of 142 spams have passed. So my question is, what is the best way to improve things? Is there any particular must-have plugins? What is the one thing I can do to a default install that is going to give me the biggest return on invested effort? train your bayes, preferred a global one to benfit all users from the same training BAYES_00 9125 73.91 % BAYES_05 3062.47 % BAYES_20 3282.65 % BAYES_40 2852.30 % BAYES_50 11499.30 % BAYES_60 1080.87 % BAYES_80 980.79 % BAYES_95 920.74 % BAYES_99 8546.91 % BAYES_999 7816.32 % DELIVERED 14631 92.37 % DNSWL 13696 86.47 % SPF 6633 41.88 % SPF/DKIM WL 3392 21.41 % SHORTCIRCUIT 3488 22.02 % BLOCKED 14919.41 % [sa-milt@mail-gw:~]$ spamfilter-blocked.sh | grep "Jun 8" | wc -l 287 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Must-Have Plugins?
So I have had SA running for about 2 days on a very small site with a handful of users. I've been running the default config just to see how well it would do by itself. Unfortunately quite a lot of spam is getting through. So far 40 of 142 spams have passed. So my question is, what is the best way to improve things? Is there any particular must-have plugins? What is the one thing I can do to a default install that is going to give me the biggest return on invested effort? Mike
Re: Cron /home/ler/bin/update-bayes.sh
On 6/6/2015 1:55 PM, Bill Cole wrote: work up a patch, Add an option to flag only uris prefixed with a protocol, document it well, implement the function where it is need, test it and submit it for inclusion. My stream of time slices fit for coding doesn't even qualify as a stream. I'll be lucky if I can find the right point of attack for this this month, no idea when I'd actually be able to write anything worth submitting. We are all volunteers. But I hope we can agree there is a rhyme of reason to how things work with TLDs and URIs as implemented and hopefully you can cajole someone into working on this patch. Regards, KAM
Re: Better Post Processing
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Marc Selig wrote: I use a single folder for fresh spam. When a user ... Yes, we have a similar homegrown arrangement. It is a long time since I helped to set it up, so I may not remember all the details. Essentially, all the spam tagged as such by spamassassin (running under an amavis milter on our two entrance mx's) is quarantined into a single folder. Single mean ONE FOR ALL users. Users never see such spam directly. Such folder is rotated daily, and deleted after one week. A crontab is run daily, and sends each user a "spam report" which reports for the quarantined messages the apparent origin, destination, relay and subject. Users who read such report and find a message was incorrectly tagged as spam, apply to the system manager. This occurs very seldom. The sysman sends the message to the user, and moves it to a "ham" folder. Users who instead receive residual spam (1-2/day/user ?), may voluntarily copy it to a folder "user.spam" in a common scratch area "spam". A crontab takes care of feeding the ham and spam folders to sa-learn. This has been working happily for several years (the last 4 of which with not much spam stopped by spamassassin because it is stopped by graylisting BEFORE). -- Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy) For more info : http://www.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/personal.html Do not like Firefox >=29 ? Get Pale Moon ! http://www.palemoon.org
