Re: FreeMail.pm
Henrik K wrote the following on 28/01/09 18:54: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:35:44AM -0800, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Henrik K wrote: http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm I notice the list of freemail providers has changed - how frequently should we be updating this plugin? Is there an sa-update channel for it? Haven't updated it in a long time.. Someone could easily host a freemail.cf with only freemail_domains lines if they wanted. Unfortunately I don't have the resources to detect/find/update such domains currently. Cheers, Henrik Henrik A list of freemail address has been maintained for a long time at http://www.oryx.com/spam/freemail/domains.txt Not sure how often they update, but I've been using their list for some years now. Alan
DKIM
The DKIM plugin files have all but disappeared on one of my mx's..I'm left with /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DKIM.pm /usr/share/man/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM.3pm.gz I've tried re-installing/upgrading from the rpm (spamassassin-3.1.7-1.fc5) but this has not fixed things. Is there another way I can re-install this plugins files? Thanks Alan
Re: DKIM
Mark Martinec wrote the following on 10/01/2007 16:45: The Plugin/DKIM.pm is all there is to it. No other files in SA plugins directory is associated with DKIM. There is however a Mail/DKIM.pm and Mail/DKIM/* perl module in the usual modules places that you may be looking for. Mark Thanks Mark. When I saw the lint fail I just started comparing file lists Too busy looking at a VoIP problem to think that the perl module had disappeared. Alan
Re: RelayCountry plugin doesn't add header
Nick Radov wrote the following on 02/01/2007 18:35: I am running SpamAssassin 3.1.7 in serial mode on Windows 2003. I would like to use the RelayCountry plugin and have enabled it as described on this web page: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RelayCountryPlugin. But when I ran a test message through, the X-Relay-Countries header wasn't added. Can anyone suggest how to fix this? The IP::Country::Fast module is installed. And here is a filtered excerpt from the SpamAssassin debugging output which seems to show the plugin is being loaded correctly. [18136] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry from @INC [18136] dbg: plugin: registered Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry=HASH(0x29b40b0) [18136] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry=HASH(0x29b40b0) implements 'extract_metadata' [18136] dbg: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry=HASH(0x29b40b0) implements 'parsed_metadata' The particular test message that I used has this Received header. Received: from 14.9.17.81.nexcom.ru ([81.17.9.14]) by ax7.axolotl.com (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.2) with ESMTP id 2006122820 http://www.snapanumber.com/563462-40926 ; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:56:34 -0800 I did a manual whois lookup on IP address 81.17.9.14 and it is registered to Russia, so I think I should get a X-Relay-Countries: RU header. But it doesn't work. If you just want a header added with the relay countries listed then you'll need to patch SA (3.1x) see the wiki (or review recent threads here). Otherwise you need to specify in either local.cf or a dedicated conf file those countries you want to see in the headers and with which score. To test these I wrote a simple script (I'm no programmer) below which writes Relay_Countries.cf which you can put in your spamassassin directory. You can enable/disable each entry by toggling the value of the 1st field and adjust the scores by amending the last field. You can then tweak to just track those countries you are interested in. I did include all the country codes as listed on the ISO site. Alan #! /bin/bash echo start # shopt -s -o xtrace OUTPUT_FILE=Relay_Countries.cf OUTPUT_DIR=. #OUTPUT_DIR=/etc/mail/spamassassin # # Fields: # USE=1 # yes=1, no=0 CODE=2 # Country Code DESCRIPTION=3 # Description SCORE=4 # Score NUM_FIELDS=4 # # Data: # COUNTRY[1]=1~AD~Andorra~0.001 COUNTRY[2]=1~AE~United Arab Emirates~0.001 COUNTRY[3]=1~AF~Afghanistan~0.001 COUNTRY[4]=1~AG~Antigua and Barbuda~0.001 COUNTRY[5]=1~AI~Anguilla~0.001 COUNTRY[6]=1~AL~Albania~0.001 COUNTRY[7]=1~AM~Armenia~0.001 COUNTRY[8]=1~AN~Netherlands Antilles~0.001 COUNTRY[9]=1~AO~Angola~0.001 COUNTRY[10]=1~AQ~Antarctica~0.001 COUNTRY[11]=1~AR~Argentina~0.001 COUNTRY[12]=1~AS~American Samoa~0.001 COUNTRY[13]=1~AT~Austria~0.001 COUNTRY[14]=1~AU~Australia~0.001 COUNTRY[15]=1~AW~Aruba~0.001 COUNTRY[16]=1~AX~Åland Islands~0.001 COUNTRY[17]=1~AZ~Azerbaijan~0.001 COUNTRY[18]=1~BA~Bosnia and Herzegovina~0.001 COUNTRY[19]=1~BB~Barbados~0.001 COUNTRY[20]=1~BD~Bangladesh~0.001 COUNTRY[21]=1~BE~Belgium~0.001 COUNTRY[22]=1~BF~Burkina Faso~0.001 COUNTRY[23]=1~BG~Bulgaria~0.001 COUNTRY[24]=1~BH~Bahrain~0.001 COUNTRY[25]=1~BI~Burundi~0.001 COUNTRY[26]=1~BJ~Benin~0.001 COUNTRY[27]=1~BM~Bermuda~0.001 COUNTRY[28]=1~BN~Brunei Darussalam~0.001 COUNTRY[29]=1~BO~Bolivia~0.001 COUNTRY[30]=1~BR~Brazil~0.001 COUNTRY[31]=1~BS~Bahamas~0.001 COUNTRY[32]=1~BT~Bhutan~0.001 COUNTRY[33]=1~BV~Bouvet Island~0.001 COUNTRY[34]=1~BW~Botswana~0.001 COUNTRY[35]=1~BY~Belarus~0.001 COUNTRY[36]=1~BZ~Belize~0.001 COUNTRY[37]=1~CA~Canada~0.001 COUNTRY[38]=1~CC~Cocos (Keeling) Islands~0.001 COUNTRY[39]=1~CD~Congo, the Democratic Republic of the~0.001 COUNTRY[40]=1~CF~Central African Republic~0.001 COUNTRY[41]=1~CG~Congo~0.001 COUNTRY[42]=1~CH~Switzerland~0.001 COUNTRY[43]=1~CI~Côte d'Ivoire~0.001 COUNTRY[44]=1~CK~Cook Islands~0.001 COUNTRY[45]=1~CL~Chile~0.001 COUNTRY[46]=1~CM~Cameroon~0.001 COUNTRY[47]=1~CN~China~0.001 COUNTRY[48]=1~CO~Colombia~0.001 COUNTRY[49]=1~CR~Costa Rica~0.001 COUNTRY[50]=1~CU~Cuba~0.001 COUNTRY[51]=1~CV~Cape Verde~0.001 COUNTRY[52]=1~CX~Christmas Island~0.001 COUNTRY[53]=1~CY~Cyprus~0.001 COUNTRY[54]=1~CZ~Czech Republic~0.001 COUNTRY[55]=1~DE~Germany~0.001 COUNTRY[56]=1~DJ~Djibouti~0.001 COUNTRY[57]=1~DK~Denmark~0.001 COUNTRY[58]=1~DM~Dominica~0.001 COUNTRY[59]=1~DO~Dominican Republic~0.001 COUNTRY[60]=1~DZ~Algeria~0.001 COUNTRY[61]=1~EC~Ecuador~0.001 COUNTRY[62]=1~EE~Estonia~0.001 COUNTRY[63]=1~EG~Egypt~0.001 COUNTRY[64]=1~EH~Western Sahara~0.001 COUNTRY[65]=1~ER~Eritrea~0.001 COUNTRY[66]=1~ES~Spain~0.001 COUNTRY[67]=1~ET~Ethiopia~0.001 COUNTRY[68]=1~FI~Finland~0.001 COUNTRY[69]=1~FJ~Fiji~0.001 COUNTRY[70]=1~FK~Falkland Islands (Malvinas)~0.001 COUNTRY[71]=1~FM~Micronesia, Federated States of~0.001 COUNTRY[72]=1~FO~Faroe Islands~0.001 COUNTRY[73]=1~FR~France~0.001 COUNTRY[74]=1~GA~Gabon~0.001 COUNTRY[75]=1~GB~United
Re: Spamassassin doesn't ding sender for saying HELO i-am-you
Justin Mason wrote the following on 07/12/2006 13:21: This is a great spam-sign alright, but I don't know of a way to detect what the local site's HELO is, bar each site writing their own rules to do so. Bayes does a good job of figuring this out, btw. Any suggestions? A script that telnets into the mail system to discover helo name and the associated IP? Then it can write a system specific rule. Alan
Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 06/12/2006 00:31: Advantage over sa-update? Other than the issue with 3.1.6 (only), there shouldn't be any issues with how sa-update lints rules. This is not obvious as there is no mention of linting in the docs http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-update.html If so is there a migration guide somewhere on moving from RDJ to sa-update? - remove existing SARE rules from wherever you've got them - decide on which provider of the SARE channel(s) you're going to use - follow that providers directions And while there is good information on using sa-update for SARE rules, there don't appear to be any references on how-to migrate to it from RDJ. The only other thing (AFAIK) that would hold someone from moving is that RDJ still covers some rule sets that are not available via sa-update. Alan
Re: rules_du_jour not working confusion?
By default, there is no duplication. sa-update will update only the stock rules. However, there have been additional channels created for sa-update to allow it to update the SARE rules as well. You just add the ones you want to your sa-update channels file. One advantage RDJ seems to have is that it won't leave you in the situation of a non functional SA because your updated rules don't lint. If using sa-update for SARE rules, are these stored in the same location as the originals or are they downloaded to the /var/lib/spamassassin tree? If so is there a migration guide somewhere on moving from RDJ to sa-update? Alan
Score=x+5
I've just seen a mail marked as spammy (amavisd-new) where the score header had Score=x+5 where x was the sum of the SA tests. X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=0.917+5 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.727,BAYES_00=-2.599, BOTNET_SERVERWORDS=-0.01, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, P0F_UNIX=-0.001, SARE_HTML_MANY_BR05=0.5,SARE_HTML_TD_BR=0.934, SARE_UNA=1.231, SPF_PASS=-0.001] I'm curious as to where the 5 came from as the the mail report does not look like spam: Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -- -- -0.0 P0F_UNIX OS fingerprint BSD/Solaris/HP-UX/Tru64 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 BOTNET_SERVERWORDS Hostname contains server-like substrings -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.2 SARE_UNA RAW: SARE_UNA 0.9 SARE_HTML_TD_BRFULL: Multiple line breaks in spammer pattern 0.5 SARE_HTML_MANY_BR05Tooo many br's! 0.7 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list I've not seen this before (in over 4 years) and could not see and answer from a quick search. Thanks Alan
Re: FuzzyOCR request
decoder wrote the following on 04/10/2006 21:38: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan Munday wrote: Chris Could you consider adding a configuration parameter which would have the effect of scoring all results as zero? This would allow people to configure FuzzyOCR for their systems in the knowledge that it will not affect the current running state. It will also allow people to test the effects of FuzzyOCR on their current traffic before taking it live. regards Alan This seems like a very good idea, I will implement this as soon as I am able to continue the development again. At the moment I am busy with unversity stuff but in some weeks I will have more time again :) Best regards, Chris Chris Thank you for considering this. I've been following your developments and looking at how to integrate with my (few) systems. But as I don't have a test environment (until I have built a VMWare one) I was cautious at trying this with one of the live box's. Zero scoring seemed to be a good way round this. regards Alan
Re: URIBL?
jdow wrote the following on 26/08/2005 22:08:
Ask an amavisd-new expert. It's already part of SpamAssassin. Perhaps
amavisd-new overrides some of the SpamAssassin configurations? Good
luck with it.
{^_^}
From: Thomas Deliduka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But what configuration do I need to do to add it?
On 8/26/05 5:01 PM this was written:
From: Thomas Deliduka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I couldn't find an answer to this in the archives. My apologies if
this is
there.
I ran a test on a spam (spamassassin -t spam) and within the rules
that
matched it outputted these:
0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
3.9 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL
blocklist
2.0 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL
blocklist
0.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL
blocklist
2.0 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL
blocklist
1.5 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
blocklist
However, the mail server when using amavisd-new checks spam, it never
checks
against this SURBL blocklist. I see in init.pre this line:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
Which I think is related. But in either case. Why would it check within
the
testing system but not when the actual program checks? Is there a
way to
enable it?
I don't know about amavisd-new from shucked corn; but, I understand it
runs its own daemonized spamassassin. If so then you may have to restart
it. With spamd you certainly have to restart the daemon to get it to
read changes to the configuration files, with the exception of the
user's configuration files.
Spamd is not called from amavisd-new. It calls spamassassin directly.
The configuration information with respect to individual SURBL's needs to go
into SURBL.cf in the directory you store your spamassassin information (e.g.
/etc/mail/spamassassin).
To use SURBL's you need the load plugin statement in init.pre.
So if it works from calling spamassasin on the command line it should be the same as when amavisd-new calls it.
My last guess at why the difference, is that you were not logged in as the
amavis user when you ran spamassassin.
HTH
Alan
Re: Cannot get rid of new online pharmacy spams
Eddy Beliveau wrote the following on 25/05/2005 14:19: Hi! I'm running spamassassin 2.4 with pamCopURI 0.24 and it work perfectly. Thanks ;-) Eddy Have you tried updating to a newer version? I suspect it will be many peoples first suggestion. Alan
AWL - SQL
Is it possible to move the awl data when migrating to SQL? Thanks Alan
Re: AWL - SQL
Michael Parker wrote the following on 13/05/2005 17:32: On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:28:14PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote: Is it possible to move the awl data when migrating to SQL? tools/convert_awl_dbm_to_sql Michael Michael Ah ha, I did not have the tools installed. Maybe a reference to this could be added to the sql/README.awl ? Thanks. Alan
Re: AWL - SQL
Alan Munday wrote the following on 13/05/2005 17:48: Michael Parker wrote the following on 13/05/2005 17:32: On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:28:14PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote: Is it possible to move the awl data when migrating to SQL? tools/convert_awl_dbm_to_sql Michael Michael Ah ha, I did not have the tools installed. Maybe a reference to this could be added to the sql/README.awl ? Thanks. Alan Just to report the the conversion script worked without problem. Thanks Alan
SQL Question
I've been looking through the SA SQL docs and can only see references to spamc/spamd use of SQL. Can I just confirm that SQL can be used with spamassassin as well? Thanks Alan
Re: SQL Question
Michael Parker wrote the following on 12/05/2005 17:37: On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:16:19PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote: I've been looking through the SA SQL docs and can only see references to spamc/spamd use of SQL. Can I just confirm that SQL can be used with spamassassin as well? Only for Bayes and AWL, userprefs in SQL requires the use of spamd. Michael Michael Thanks, though I can't seem to find the Docs that cover bayes/AWL setup on the Wiki or apache site. Are there any docs that are considered definitive around? Alan
Re: SQL Question
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote the following on 12/05/2005 18:03: Alan Munday wrote: Look at http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/ for file names that end in SQL. Kevin Thanks, they did not come up when googling. Alan
Re: SQL Question
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote the following on 12/05/2005 18:12: Actually, scratch that. Those are not the documents I was thinking they were.Instead, download the latest copy of SA and you will find a folder in the distribution called sql. In there, there is some README files that describe how to set everything up. That's better thanks Alan
Re: amavisd-new
Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote the following on 21/04/2005 16:05: The expected results of this, as I say, is that ALL emails will be tagged as spam; will have SA headers inserts; will have a copy placed into the the quarantine folder; and finally will be passed on back to the MTA for delivery. This should suffice for the type of testing you want to do. Anything more complicated and you will need to use your MTA to help sort things out. Kevin Thanks Kevin This is pretty close but I don't really want all the mail to the end users marked as spam. My current live box's use anomy where I've amended the scripts to copy mail into mbox's non-spam, marked-spam and not-delivered-spam. This means it has been really easy to check for false positives/negatives and to feed corrections back into SA. This was one of the reasons for trying to replicate this with amavisd-new. Being new to amavisd-new I'm still getting used to its architecture. Which while I've been doing this I've been trying to figure out how to handle corrections to SA when I don't have a copy of the source mail. Right now my thinking was to add an -o always_bcc = [EMAIL PROTECTED] to master.cf for when amavisd-new passes the mail back to postfix for delivery. regards Alan
Re: How do I whitelist this list?
I'll mention this again since i have yet to come up with a solution. While the above works great for people using procmail, does anyone have a solution that works without procmail? Im stuck passing all list traffic through SA because of this. Just this morning someone on this list posted a spam that they received. It was autolearned as ham on my system because it came across on the list. Then the message gets popped down to my workstation and i cant even get the original message back to the server to re-learn it. Theres gotta be a solution out there for the non-procmail people. Surely somebody is doing it?? Qmail/qmail-scanner/clamav/spamassassin on rh9 -Jim Use dedicated e-mail addresses for mail lists. As mail for that address arrives, don't send it through whatever filtering you have. Alan
Re: pyzor
Matt Kettler wrote the following on 28/02/2005 12:32: At 07:14 AM 2/28/2005, Slava Garaschenko wrote: But, then I run spamassassin in daemon mode by /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassinstart I dont' see any request to port 24441 which is used by pyzor. This means that pyzor completely don't work with spamassassin. At least then spamassassin is used in daemon mode. When you did this test, did you actually feed a message to spamc? Merely starting spamd does nothing until spamc has a message to check. Matt I've been wondering if there has been a problem with pyzor for a while. On reading this I've just checked my firewall logs for traffic to the pyzor servers. In the last 2 hours there have been 46 requests sent to the servers from one spamd daemon. Of these there have been no responses from the pyzor servers. While a test using spamassassin -D --lint usually shows a response from pyzor, right now they are timing out. The problem the OP has is probably due to the remote end timing out. I would be interested if anyone knows if there has been a change in status for the pyzor project as I have not seen a hit from them in a long while. regards Alan
Re: pyzor
martin smith wrote the following on 28/02/2005 15:33: Just found this, could be the cause of some of the problems. 2005-02-04 The public server changed its address; please re-run 'pyzor discover' to find the new server. http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/ Martin Martin As the date shows, this is an old notice. However I did run a discover before I did the testing. Nothing coming back from the pyzor servers. Alan
Re: pyzor
Matt Kettler wrote the following on 28/02/2005 15:48: Alan, Slava is running tcpdump, and claims to not see *any* pyzor traffic at all, not even the outbound request. Their problem is almost certainly not due to remote-side timeouts. The only thing I can think of is the -H parameter to spamd... With no parameter the docs claim it will use the spamc caller's home dir for razor/pyzor/dcc user config files. Slava, does the user vilter have a home directory, and rwx permissions to it? Also, what user does spamc get called as? Matt/Bill My issue is that although a pyzor discover has updated the servers file, and shows the new server address Bill pointed out, when called in debug mode the old address is still being used. Alan
Re: pyzor
And my problem, should anyone find this useful: pyzor discover was correctly updating the servers file for the user account it was called from. However I have a --homedir set for pyzor in local.cf and as this is not the same dir as the user file hence the failure to update. Deleting/renaming the servers file in the --homedir and then running spamassasin in debug mode sees this copy of servers being updated correctly. Alan
Re: Addition Problem?
Matt Kettler wrote the following on 02/02/2005 17:12: Bonus points if you use the add_header feature to create a secondary X-Spam-Status header that is X-Server1-Spam-Status: OK Matt I liked the idea of this so have been looking through the config docs to find the answer. But I've failed to do so. So how do you use add_header to modify the X-Spam headers? Thanks Alan And I really wanted that bonus point.
Re: Addition Problem?
Matt Kettler wrote the following on 02/02/2005 22:02: Actually, it's limit in SA's header generation that I forgot about. I forgot that it forces X-Spam as a prefix. Does that mean I can have the bonus point after all?
RH9 Insecure dependency on reporting to spamcop (SA 3.0.2)
I wondered if anyone had tracked down a cause/solution to the insecure dependency on reporting to spamcop with RH9? I have 3 RH9 servers here. One, which has been upgraded from RH7 progressively through to RH9, which does not report this insecure dependency. While I have 2 others, installed with RH9 as new builds, which do show this insecure dependency. I know its not an SA problem just wondered if someone had tracked down a 'fix' Thanks Alan
Re: Postfix relay problem with SA ?
Ronald I. Nutter wrote the following on 11/01/2005 16:43: I am noticing entries in the maillog like the following. This tells me that somehow mail is relaying through my system. I followed the Scott Henderson setup document and havent noticed this before. Jan 11 11:24:33 SA2 postfix/smtp[12722]: 8FE98F4280: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=milter1.store.vip.sc5.yahoo.com[216.136.232.238], delay=22, status=bounced (host milter1.store.vip.sc5.yahoo.com[216.136.232.238] said: 550 5.0.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command)) Ron Are you sure you have a problem? The mail log shows postfix bouncing the message. Alan
AWL not working on 3.02
I have a couple new installs of SA3 (on RH9 from rpm) where I knew AWL did not run and today I decided to see why. The output from -D --lint is: debug: lock: 31719 created /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.mx1.domain.com.31719 debug: lock: 31719 trying to get lock on /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist with 0 retries debug: lock: 31719 link to /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: link ok debug: Tie-ing to DB file R/W in /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist debug: unlock: 31719 unlink /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock debug: open of AWL file failed: Cannot open auto_whitelist_path /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist: Inappropriate ioctl for device debug: Post AWL score: 0.2990001 So I've done the obvious and checked the user settings and permissions are set correctly, indeed I opened the permissions up on the AWL directory. One thing I thought could be a problem is that I have two versions of DB on this system: db4-4.0.14-20 db4-4.1.25-14 And I also have: gdbm-1.8.0-20 So I've set auto_whitelist_db_modules to DB_File and GDBM_File separately and retested. None of which is having any effect on the lint output. I've done a fair bit of searching for others showing this error but the postings I'm finding relate to older versions of SA. Currently I have the following re. AWL in local.cf: # Auto Whitelist use_auto_whitelist 1 auto_whitelist_path /var/spool/spamassassin/auto-whitelist auto_whitelist_file_mode 0777 auto_whitelist_db_modules GDBM_File Does anyone have any thoughts on why AWL is not working here? Are there some initiation procedures that need to be run? Thanks Alan
x_headers 1.19 lint fail for SA 3.xx
Brent - for information: Version line: # $Revision: 1.19 $ Lint output: warning: description for BCS_XMFLAG_AUTH is over 50 chars Unless x_headers should not be used in 3.xx? Alan
FW: Lint fails on latest bogus0virus-warnings.cf
-Original Message- From: Mike Zanker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 6:43 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Lint fails on latest bogus0virus-warnings.cf From RulesDuJour last night: Lint output: Relative score without previous setting in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: score VIRUS_WARNING412 Unhelpful 'virus warning' (412) Thanks, Mike. Just for clarification, after this update: Lint fails on 3.0.1 here Lint does not fail for 2.6.3 here. Alan
[OT] hascash
Does anyone have any knowledge on how the development of hascash is going? I've been searching around this afternoon and can find only a little information (2 pages of Google search results) out there. Particularly looking to see if any plugins are available (or will be) for outlook clients (the hashcash guy's don't seem to keen on supporting M$) or MTA's e.g. postfix (though there does seem to be the odd alpha out there). As I can see no references to hashcash in my logs; Is hashcash like SURBL, I'm on RH9 here, in that there are some modules required before SA will test for it? I noticed a reference on a Debian site to a hashcash application. Or is it sufficient to have sha1sum loaded? Thanks Alan
[OT] Spammer behaviour
I'm in the process of building a couple of new servers and to run some test mail through, put one of them on the tertiary address for a domain. While I know this topic was discussed a while ago I was surprised at what I was seeing in the logs namely; - all traffic to the tertiary was UCE - there was a very low percentage of the total UCE for this domain hitting the tertiary - most of the UCE is hitting the secondary - not a single connection to the tertiary, that was greylisted, was re-presented. NRR Alan PS Has Chris been on the happy pill's?
RE: upgrade not going to plan
-Original Message- From: Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:32 AM To: spam Subject: upgrade not going to plan Just completed an upgrade to v3.0 from 2.63. SA not accepting *any* external connections on the one mailhub i upgraded on. The other 2 hubs are running fine but still using 2.63. all hubs are solaris sun boxes. Is there any configuration changes needed for version3 cause i havent seen any refernce to it in the sourece or readmes... Did you try here? http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/UPGRADE
Building SA3 on RH9
I've built a set of rpm's from the SA3 tar.gz I've used yum for updates and have installed the perl modules which means I have perl-Mail-SpamAssassin and spamassassin installed. I have however not found perl(Parse::Syslog) or perl(Statistics::Distributions) needed for spamassassin-tools. I just wanted to check the best method of getting these modules as I know RH can be a bit fussy and I want to avoid getting modules in the wrong part of the perl tree. Thanks Alan
