Re: re2c error..
tkalfaoglu wrote: Hi. I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# re2c -v re2c 0.13.3 To see what would happen, I changed the fatal(Token limit exceed) with puts(Token limit exceeded) and it put out two of these warnings and proceeded to compile them fine. Then I did a lint, and that worked, so I just have it running now.. Not very safe, but it works :) -t Slightly OT. I've only ever received this error when I've used the SoughtRules. Standard and SARE rules have never generated this error for me.
Re: Is http://www.rulesemporium.com?
Ed Kasky wrote: At 12:08 AM Friday, 2/29/2008, blaine wrote -= I was not able to access http://www.rulesemporium.com? is this working are moved some where? Works fine from here. Site is reachable and resolves to 72.52.4.74 which pings fine as well. Something's broken somewhere. From sunny Los Angeles where it was 80 degrees yesterday: traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 ns5gt.wrenkasky.com (10.10.10.1) 0.620 ms 0.809 ms 1.058 ms 2 router.wrenkasky.com (216.102.129.41) 13.910 ms 19.470 ms 24.269 ms 3 dist4-vlan60.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (67.114.50.66) 29.160 ms 34.044 ms 38.922 ms 4 bb2-g10-0.irvnca.sbcglobal.net (151.164.92.198) 85.450 ms 86.375 ms 87.311 ms 5 151.164.93.167 (151.164.93.167) 70.757 ms 71.946 ms 72.868 ms 6 151.164.251.214 (151.164.251.214) 74.810 ms 76.133 ms 80.781 ms 7 dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.80.14) 144.269 ms 72.000 ms 71.572 ms 8 mai-b1-link.telia.net (80.91.252.62) 100.388 ms 102.816 ms 107.478 ms 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * --snip-- 30 * * * Half / half here. From one server it doesn't work: traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 heroine.xprima.com (207.96.225.62) 0.621 ms 0.649 ms 0.695 ms 2 ia-piex-gw06-vl1219.vtl.net (207.253.197.1) 1.667 ms 1.366 ms 0.978 ms 3 216.113.123.9 (216.113.123.9) 1.721 ms 1.593 ms 1.248 ms 4 ia-piex-bb04-pos11-0-0-cpe082.vtl.net (216.113.122.82) 14.211 ms * * 5 sl-tisca1-60020-0.sprintlink.net (144.223.37.150) 11.102 ms 11.099 ms 23.997 ms 6 so-0-0-0.mia11.ip.tiscali.net (89.149.186.45) 46.055 ms 46.032 ms 46.057 ms 7 prolexic-gw.ip.tiscali.net (213.200.73.38) 46.046 ms 46.059 ms 45.550 ms 8 * * * 9 * * * --snip-- 30 * * * From a second server it does: traceroute to 72.52.4.74 (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 erx02.tor.pppoe.ca (206.248.154.120) 52.137 ms 47.751 ms 49.089 ms 2 i2110.border1.pppoe.ca (206.248.155.249) 48.226 ms 47.784 ms 47.483 ms 3 65.39.198.249 (65.39.198.249) 46.819 ms 48.314 ms 47.175 ms 4 oc48-po4-0.nyc-telx-dis-2.peer1.net (216.187.115.126) 56.828 ms 57.145 ms 56.887 ms 5 oc48-po3-0.nyc-75bre-dis-1.peer1.net (216.187.115.134) 58.735 ms 57.571 ms 58.153 ms 6 oc48-po2-0.wdc-eqx-dis-1.peer1.net (216.187.115.54) 63.232 ms 64.553 ms 63.534 ms 7 * * * 8 unknown.hwng.net (69.16.190.161) 85.520 ms 86.509 ms 85.609 ms 9 1-1.r1.lo.hwng.net (69.16.191.50) 153.904 ms 154.564 ms 154.897 ms 10 unknown.hwng.net (69.16.189.66) 148.284 ms 148.410 ms 148.168 ms 11 unknown.prolexic.com (209.200.156.34) 147.512 ms 148.232 ms 148.250 ms 12 unknown.prolexic.com (72.52.4.74) 147.229 ms 148.328 ms 148.167 ms David
Re: RulesDuJour Summary messages
Tracey Gates wrote: I'm getting the following messages from the RulesDuJour run: RulesDuJour Run Summary on yoursummit.com: No index found for ruleset named ARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM. Check that this ruleset is still valid. SARE Top 200 spamcop ip addresses Ruleset (automatically generated) has changed on yoursummit.com. Version line: # Modified: 06/23/2006 2:58:27 PM EST No index found for ruleset named SARE_URI2. Check that this ruleset is still valid. How do I check that the ruleset is valid?? I went to rulesemporium and they say that these rules are still active with Auto-Update as yes. What do I need to do to rectify these issues? Thanks! Tracey Gates Lead Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] You may wish to check again... a. ARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM? Are you sure it's not SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM? b. From SARE rules page: '... add one or more of SARE_URI0, SARE_URI1, SARE_URI3, or SARE_URI_ENG to TRUSTED_RULESETS ...' Where did you get SARE_URI2 from? HTH David Filion -- David Filion System / Network Administrator Auto123.com / XPrima Corporation
Re: Setting up my own RBL - How?
Marc Perkel wrote: So - if I wanted to set up my own RBL for others to query me, how would I do that? I'm seriously thinking about it. Alternatively, I can stream my spam to anyone else who is already doing it. I've modified my spam stream to exclude stuff already listed in several other popular block lists. (Sorry for the late answer; long weekend). I set one up using the following instructions: http://www.kloth.net/internet/dnsbl-howto.php The setup described uses bind instead of a dedicated dnsbl app. The only down side is it can create some large bind logs if you get a decent* amount of traffic. Fun note: One cool thing with using a dnsbl is that you can put interesting messages in the txt record that get passed back to the sender. Messages like: While I too am a fan of Monty Python, and do enjoy the spam sketch, I don't enjoy spam, spam, email and spam. Goodbye. *decent: more than a trickle and less than lots. HTH -- David Filion
