Re: URIXBL?
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 14:46 -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote: > Jeff Hardy wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I've been diddling with some tests and wondered why there is a spamhaus > > URIBL_SBL, but not URIBL_XBL (or better yet, combined URIBL_SBL-XBL). I > > can create this myself easy enough, but wondered if there was a reason > > XBL is not included. Thanks. > > XBL is mostly infected PCs. These systems are used to send spam but not > generally to host spam domains. Yeah, I thought that through when I was testing and didn't see many hits. Thanks.
Re: URIXBL?
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 20:38 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: > Jeff Hardy writes: > > Hello all, > > > > I've been diddling with some tests and wondered why there is a spamhaus > > URIBL_SBL, but not URIBL_XBL (or better yet, combined URIBL_SBL-XBL). I > > can create this myself easy enough, but wondered if there was a reason > > XBL is not included. Thanks. > > Basically, it didn't work well ;) Try it out -- it doesn't correlate > well with spam. > > --j. Fair enough I'll test away. BTW, for anyone else coming across this post: warn: config: error: rule 'URIBL_SBL-XBL' has invalid characters (not Alphanumeric + Underscore + starting with a non-digit) Have to get rid of that hyphen. Thank you 'spamassassin -D all ...' :) Thanks for the reply. -Jeff
URIXBL?
Hello all, I've been diddling with some tests and wondered why there is a spamhaus URIBL_SBL, but not URIBL_XBL (or better yet, combined URIBL_SBL-XBL). I can create this myself easy enough, but wondered if there was a reason XBL is not included. Thanks. -Jeff
Re: Any ISP's using SpamAssassin with user customization?
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 16:01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So my shell account may be disappearing soon and I'm looking for a > recommendation for an ISP that provides SA but also allows me to apply my own > perl filter for any mail that arrives. The latter isn't crucial but it's very > prefered. > > Looking basically for webmail (https) imap4 and the ability to launch my own > perlscript for an arriving mail and run my own CPAN modules. so basically a > domain account and an associated shell account. > > Anybody running SA on their own colo setup? If so what does that cost? > > Would be prepared to colo a mac mini somewhere if it was affordable. > > > > > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. My first post to this list, but anyway... dreamhost.com gives you full shell access, webmail, Maildir format, procmail (I don't have experience with it but you can probably tie in what you need there), full htaccess options for webspace, etc. etc. I moved a personal domain of mine there and haven't looked back. Wiki: wiki.dreamhost.com -Jeff -- Jeff Hardy Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
