Re: Spamd hits 100% and times out - Started today
Hi, On dim, 2011-03-20 at 21:37 +0100, JKL wrote: > Happy weekend everybody, ... > Any ideas where I should start to look? It's surely related to the "__PILL_PRICE" (aka re2c bug with sa-compile on ia32) problem. See: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201103.mbox/%3c4d85d121.5020...@fastmail.net%3E and https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6558 Cheers. -- Laurent Luyckx
RE: Help...dcc
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 10:01 +, Gray, Richard wrote: > > > > debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a > map file?): no valid DCC server hostnames > > Did you? > > The errors certainly suggest that everything is working, but that dcc > can't find any servers. The map file is either not there or not complete. Try by using the map.txt shipped with your version and do: $ cd you_dcc_dir $ rm map $ cdcc "new map; load map.txt" Type cdcc stats to check if you've any answer from the public servers. Hope it helps. > > R -- Laurent Luyckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RE: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 12:01 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote: > Hi Laurent. > > Did what you said. > > Got the following: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]$ cd $DCC_HOME > [EMAIL PROTECTED] xadmin]$ cdcc info > map.txt > [EMAIL PROTECTED] xadmin]$ cdcc "new map; load map.txt" > open(/var/lib/dcc/map): File exists ? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] xadmin]$ > Move the "map" file to another name and do what I said in my previous mail. Laurent. > > > -Original Message- > From: Laurent Luyckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 January 2005 10:28 AM > To: Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC > > On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 08:34 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] > wrote: > > > debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a map > > file?): missing SMTP header lines; fatal error > > > > "(did you create a map file?)" > > DCC seems not be configured yet. > > If you plan to use the public servers, do this: > > cd $DCC_HOME (where dcc resides) > cdcc info > map.txt > cdcc "new map; load map.txt" > > > Any advise on how to rectify this would be appreciated. > > > > Laurent. > > > > -- > Laurent Luyckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Laurent Luyckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 08:34 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote: > debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a map > file?): missing SMTP header lines; fatal error > > "(did you create a map file?)" DCC seems not be configured yet. If you plan to use the public servers, do this: cd $DCC_HOME (where dcc resides) cdcc info > map.txt cdcc "new map; load map.txt" > Any advise on how to rectify this would be appreciated. > Laurent. -- Laurent Luyckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: SURBLs not working after upgrade to 3.0
On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 19:35, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Everything else (i.e. my rules) seem to be working fine. However, I had
> two problems.
>
> Not so bad: check_mx_attempts and one other variable which now slips my
> mind kept spitting out an 'unable to parse' error. I don't get that -
> it was EXACTLY the same as with 2.64, with which --lint didn't complain.
> Are those options now depreciated?
>
> Very bad: SURBLs don't work. I have the following in local.cf:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
>
> urirhssub URIBL_JP_SURBL multi.surbl.org.A 64
> headerURIBL_JP_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_JP_SURBL')
> describe URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains a URL listed in JP
> tflagsURIBL_JP_SURBL net
>
> score URIBL_JP_SURBL4.0
>
> I sent with a test URL:
>
> http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point-MUNGED.com/ (obviously without the
> -MUNGED), and in logs it shows the hit for the email was something like
> 0.345. What gives?
>
> FWIW, I did try other urirhsbl's also as directed by the SURBL web site.
> Still, same result - or rather, nonresult.
Are you sure you're using a recent version of Net::DNS module (>= 0.34)?
> Thanks for your help.
Cheers
Laurent.
