On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 19:35, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Everything else (i.e. my rules) seem to be working fine. However, I had
> two problems.
>
> Not so bad: check_mx_attempts and one other variable which now slips my
> mind kept spitting out an 'unable to parse' error. I don't get that -
> it was EXACTLY the same as with 2.64, with which --lint didn't complain.
> Are those options now depreciated?
>
> Very bad: SURBLs don't work. I have the following in local.cf:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
>
> urirhssub URIBL_JP_SURBL multi.surbl.org. A 64
> header URIBL_JP_SURBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_JP_SURBL')
> describe URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains a URL listed in JP
> tflags URIBL_JP_SURBL net
>
> score URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.0
>
> I sent with a test URL:
>
> http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point-MUNGED.com/ (obviously without the
> -MUNGED), and in logs it shows the hit for the email was something like
> 0.345. What gives?
>
> FWIW, I did try other urirhsbl's also as directed by the SURBL web site.
> Still, same result - or rather, nonresult.
Are you sure you're using a recent version of Net::DNS module (>= 0.34)?
> Thanks for your help.
Cheers
Laurent.
