Re: [OT] Re: Fw: failure notice / spaassassin.apache.org
On Fri, September 29, 2006 19:59, Andreas Pettersson wrote: It looks like you are listed in spamcop and apparently Comcast is either using spamcop or they have their own list that is blocking you. Comcast themselves are using a spam filter? (Let me taste that line one more time...) Comcast themselves are using a spam filter? Then why aren't they using one to block their own customers from spamming the rest of the world? waiting for intel to relaese the chip with 80 cpu' units in one single chip with water cooling, and fish to the aquarium :-) -- This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails.
Re: [OT] Re: Fw: failure notice / spaassassin.apache.org
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:31:57 +0200 (CEST), you wrote: On Fri, September 29, 2006 19:59, Andreas Pettersson wrote: It looks like you are listed in spamcop and apparently Comcast is either using spamcop or they have their own list that is blocking you. Comcast themselves are using a spam filter? (Let me taste that line one more time...) Comcast themselves are using a spam filter? Then why aren't they using one to block their own customers from spamming the rest of the world? FYI, Comcast just resells a 'white label' service from ATT / SBC, and there is indeed a group at ATT research south that monitors spam activities. Sometimes they have to decide between the customer who's sending the spam and the customers who are receiving it, is all... I recently interviewed for a job in that group. Didn't get it, but I learned a few things during the 4 hour interview. I recommended they look into SA, BTW. Mike- -- If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments, -- If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough. -- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,
[OT] Re: Fw: failure notice / spaassassin.apache.org
Ken A wrote: It looks like you are listed in spamcop and apparently Comcast is either using spamcop or they have their own list that is blocking you. Comcast themselves are using a spam filter? (Let me taste that line one more time...) Comcast themselves are using a spam filter? Then why aren't they using one to block their own customers from spamming the rest of the world? /Andreas
Re: [OT] Re: Fw: failure notice / spaassassin.apache.org
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:59:13PM +0200, Andreas Pettersson wrote: Then why aren't they using one to block their own customers from spamming the rest of the world? While you can sell we block spam from your inbox to people as a reason to pay you money, you can't sell we stop you from sending spam. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: Defend the right to keep and arm bears! pgpPUIKDGrCpZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] Re: Fw: failure notice / spaassassin.apache.org
Andreas Pettersson wrote: Ken A wrote: It looks like you are listed in spamcop and apparently Comcast is either using spamcop or they have their own list that is blocking you. Comcast themselves are using a spam filter? (Let me taste that line one more time...) Comcast themselves are using a spam filter? yes, looks like they are using brightmail Then why aren't they using one to block their own customers from spamming the rest of the world? uh, a guess? it costs too much. :-\ Ken /Andreas
Re: [OT] Re: Fw: failure notice / spaassassin.apache.org
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:59:13PM +0200, Andreas Pettersson wrote: Then why aren't they using one to block their own customers from spamming the rest of the world? While you can sell we block spam from your inbox to people as a reason to pay you money, you can't sell we stop you from sending spam. http://www.comcast.net/help/faq/index.jsp?faq=SecurityMail_Policy18625 Unless you want to send spam to our own customers, then we'll block that, unless you pay us more for commercial service. :) Too bad outgress filtering isn't as cheap as running a blacklist with your own IPs in it.
