AvWL (Was Re: AWL - lets change the name to HEAT with ln (Was Re: AWL - lets change the name))
[Top-posting fixed] On 28-May-2009, at 10:13, Dennis German wrote: Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009 LuKreme wrote No, you are confused. This is common, lots of people are confused about this. This is why many people think the name needs to be changed to "Averaged Weight List" or something similar. It needs another TLA (three letter acronym), or maybe more, whatever. Even AHBSASWAWB, as written my Matt Kettler, would be better than AWL. That would break any existing configuration. There's bugreport opened for this (i commented today) and admins just SHOULD read the docs. How 'bout a link from HEAT ( Heuristic Email Address Tracking ) AWL is probably here to stay as changing it would take too much work and cause confusion. I think a better solution would be to refer to it as the AvWL, which will obviously *not* mean "Auto". -- Like the moment when the brakes lock/And you slide towards the big truck/You stretch the frozen moments with your fear
Re: AWL - lets change the name to HEAT with ln
How 'bout a link from HEAT ( Heuristic Email Address Tracking ) Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009 LuKreme wroteNo, you are confused. This is common, lots of people are confused about this. This is why many people think the name needs to be changed to "Averaged Weight List" or something similar. On 28.05.09 12:06, Michael Monnerie wrote: The name is really a mess. Even if you'd call it "Averaged Weight List", when you read AWL then AutoWhiteList comes to your mind, right? no. It comes to your mind only because it was (and yet is) named that way. If there would be no "auto white list", we just would not know what AWL means. It needs another TLA (three letter acronym), or maybe more, whatever. Even AHBSASWAWB, as written my Matt Kettler, would be better than AWL. I don't really mind, just change it. Someone. But also the AWL shortcut. That would break any existing configuration. There's bugreport opened for this (i commented today) and admins just SHOULD read the docs.
