Re: Everything beying flagged positive by Bayes
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 29.10.07 10:19, tad1214 wrote: Ok so I just threw a few hundred (thousand?) hams at it, we will see if that helps, here is my dump magic 0.000 0 110832 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 11160 0 non-token data: nham still not enough I'd say... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. One World. One Web. One Program. - Microsoft promotional advertisement Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer! - Adolf Hitler Hmm.. Well , I have been pushing more and more ham at it, and I disabled the catchall - spam, so spam won't grow so fast any more. I will post the spam:ham again tomorrow. It is MUCH better though now. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Everything-beying-flagged-positive-by-Bayes-tf4712332.html#a13599847 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Everything beying flagged positive by Bayes
On 29.10.07 10:19, tad1214 wrote: Ok so I just threw a few hundred (thousand?) hams at it, we will see if that helps, here is my dump magic 0.000 0 110832 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 11160 0 non-token data: nham still not enough I'd say... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. One World. One Web. One Program. - Microsoft promotional advertisement Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer! - Adolf Hitler
Everything beying flagged positive by Bayes
I have bayes set to auto learn on a catchall account, which I am now thinking is a bad Idea, and now everything that is sent is pretty much flagged as 99-100% Chance spam by bayes. Usually that is it, but sometimes there are little other things that are getting FP's. I am fairly new to Spam Assassin so please forgive me if I make mistakes. freeBSD 6.2 stable SA 3.2.1_1 qmail 1.03_5 So how do I fix this issue with nearly everything being flagged as spam. Pretty much 100% of the mail being delivered to catchall is spam, but I think that SA is starting to think even common words are bad. Thanks! -=Tom Donnelly -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Everything-beying-flagged-positive-by-Bayes-tf4712332.html#a13469660 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Everything beying flagged positive by Bayes
On 29.10.07 08:18, tad1214 wrote: I have bayes set to auto learn on a catchall account, which I am now thinking is a bad Idea, and now everything that is sent is pretty much flagged as 99-100% Chance spam by bayes. Usually that is it, but sometimes there are little other things that are getting FP's. I am fairly new to Spam Assassin so please forgive me if I make mistakes. So how do I fix this issue with nearly everything being flagged as spam. Pretty much 100% of the mail being delivered to catchall is spam, but I think that SA is starting to think even common words are bad. feed some hams into SA too. If there are just a few hams and many spams, every word can look spammy -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase, (D)elete
Re: Everything beying flagged positive by Bayes
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 29.10.07 08:18, tad1214 wrote: I have bayes set to auto learn on a catchall account, which I am now thinking is a bad Idea, and now everything that is sent is pretty much flagged as 99-100% Chance spam by bayes. Usually that is it, but sometimes there are little other things that are getting FP's. I am fairly new to Spam Assassin so please forgive me if I make mistakes. So how do I fix this issue with nearly everything being flagged as spam. Pretty much 100% of the mail being delivered to catchall is spam, but I think that SA is starting to think even common words are bad. feed some hams into SA too. If there are just a few hams and many spams, every word can look spammy -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase, (D)elete Ok so I just threw a few hundred (thousand?) hams at it, we will see if that helps, here is my dump magic Pine# sa-learn --dump magic 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 110832 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 11160 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0 546924 0 non-token data: ntokens 0.000 0 1187210461 0 non-token data: oldest atime 0.000 0 1193678380 0 non-token data: newest atime 0.000 0 1193678063 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime 0.000 0 119365 0 non-token data: last expiry atime 0.000 0 124511 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta 0.000 0 61843 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Everything-beying-flagged-positive-by-Bayes-tf4712332.html#a13472281 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
