Quick Review of MIT spam conference

2005-01-24 Thread Chris Santerre
Well it was a nice trip to MIT. Here is the quick and dirty of it:

Caveat: I missed the 2 first presentations. Damn traffic! 

No new "WOW!" techniques were introduced. There were some decent data
analysis but nothing that screamed it would flag a large volume of spam. The
techniques that were introduced seemed to be pretty CPU intense to me. IBM
looked to have a solid model but some parts of their system bothered me.
Particularly the ability, at least in their flow chart, to allow people to
train the global bayes DB. Lots of other good stats presented by numerous
people. But that was a lot of the conference, analysis of data. 

Some ideas, IMHO, were ridiculous. Had these people posted their papers to
spam-l they would have been nailed to a cross. I truly believe these people
meant well, but had tunnel vision. "Regulation Instead of Stopping"
presented by the guys from Georgia had me biting my lip! The idea that a 3rd
party arbitrator should handle email requests set off so many red flags I
thought I was going to faint. 

"Spam Kings" by Brian McWilliams. NICE book! I wrestled my free copy from
the pile. Done reading it by Sunday. Very low on technical explanations, but
good insight into spammers. 

"You've Got Jail. Some First Hand Observations from the Jeremy Jaynes Spam
Trial" Jon Praed, Founding Partner, Internet Law Group. Stole the show!
Could have listened to him all day! Finally a lawyer I actually like ;)  

Other legislative ideas seemed very flawed. VERY FLAWED. During the French
presentation, they were explaining how much better their laws were and how
they were working with EU and international groups. When someone asked them
how many people had been prosecuted under this fantastic, almost 2 year old,
law, and she answered "None" I think the entire auditorium whispered "NEXT!"


"Using Lexigraphical Distancing to Block Spam" Jonathan Oliver, Director of
Research, MailFrontier, Inc. This has seemed to be an interesting problem in
a lot of the conferences. Private company says they got this technique to
fight spam. But its private and can't go into specific detail on how they do
it. And most likely it is patented. So its not as helpful to the community.
Although I liked the idea, it also felt VERY intensive to me. I could see
their DB getting big very fast. Big whitelist as well!

Bayes, bayes, and more bayes. Everyone seemed to be talking about using
bayes in different ways. I was SO HAPPY to see a few others felt the same
way as I did. Bayes ROCKS for a private email account with a techie kind of
owner. But as a more global/luser solution, it just isn't going to work well
at all. And I don't see it scaling to something like AOL. (Not much does!)

The best part of the trip were the side discussions. Finally meeting people
face to face. Many people have the same thoughts ideas that I have had. For
instance some of the best minds in antispam make ZERO dollars from fighting
spam. I really found that interesting how many antis would like a full time
career in it. This included the discussion of *hypothetically* going to the
dark side. No one seriously considering it, but discussing about how we knew
the weaknesses of the current anti-spam measures. Very interesting stuff. 

Frankly I think a day of round table discussion groups would have been even
better then having presentations. Ideas were debated during dinner and that
was a blast!

Also January in Cambridge. I thought antis were smart? :) 
I've NEVER seen so many people sleep sitting up!
Tai desserts? I'm still not sure what was in it, but I swear there is a
squirrel somewhere who can't reproduce. 
"Is your saki hot?" is a good pickup line.
The MIT train room, is more then a train room. Its Tetris! ;) 
As soon as it gets warmer, I owe someone up north a dinner! Warmer!

Hopefully I can make the spam conference on the wrong coa I mean West
coast. 

How about those Patriots!! Dynasty baby!! :-) 

Chris Santerre 
System Admin and SARE/SURBL Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin 


Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Flyer for MIT spam conference?

2005-01-05 Thread Jeff Chan
On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 3:10:49 AM, Jose Cruz wrote:

> Happy new year, folks,

> Jeff Chan wrote:
>> I hope folks going to the MIT spam conference will please
>> consider mentioning SURBLs at least informally.  In case
>> it's useful, I've updated the flyer I gave out at CEAS:
>> 
>>   http://www.surbl.org/flyer.html
>> 
>> Comments are welcomed.

> You forgot to mention j-chkmail, which supports surbl since april 2004, 
> probably 
> the oldest one, other than SpamAssassin.

> Joe

It's implicit as part of sendmail support.

Jeff C.
-- 
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/



Re: Flyer for MIT spam conference?

2005-01-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brilliant!  Nice reference.



> From: Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:25:33 -0500
> To: SURBL Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: SpamAssassin Users 
> Subject: RE: Flyer for MIT spam conference?
> 
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 5:19 PM
>> To: SURBL Discuss
>> Cc: SpamAssassin Users
>> Subject: Flyer for MIT spam conference?
>> 
>> 
>> I hope folks going to the MIT spam conference will please
>> consider mentioning SURBLs at least informally.  In case
>> it's useful, I've updated the flyer I gave out at CEAS:
>> 
>> http://www.surbl.org/flyer.html
>> 
>> Comments are welcomed.
> 
> How about T-Shirts that read:
> 
> -- SURBL --
> All your domains are, belong to us.
> 
> ;)
> 
> --Chris 
> 



RE: Flyer for MIT spam conference?

2005-01-05 Thread Chris Santerre


>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 5:19 PM
>To: SURBL Discuss
>Cc: SpamAssassin Users
>Subject: Flyer for MIT spam conference?
>
>
>I hope folks going to the MIT spam conference will please
>consider mentioning SURBLs at least informally.  In case
>it's useful, I've updated the flyer I gave out at CEAS:
>
>  http://www.surbl.org/flyer.html
>
>Comments are welcomed.

How about T-Shirts that read:

-- SURBL --
All your domains are, belong to us. 

;)

--Chris 


Flyer for MIT spam conference?

2005-01-04 Thread Jeff Chan
I hope folks going to the MIT spam conference will please
consider mentioning SURBLs at least informally.  In case
it's useful, I've updated the flyer I gave out at CEAS:

  http://www.surbl.org/flyer.html

Comments are welcomed.

Jeff C.
--
"If it appears in hams, then don't list it."



Re: MIT Spam conference

2004-12-23 Thread Vivek Khera
On Dec 17, 2004, at 4:39 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
:)  J/K, my goal is to get my eyeball as close to the webcast camera. 
Just
so when I come home I can DL the movie and say "There is my 
eyeball"
Well, that'll be touch to reach it if it was set up like last year...  
big TV type camera with a real guy operating it and seats all around it 
blocked off...



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: MIT Spam conference

2004-12-21 Thread alan premselaar
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
William Stearns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...snip...
If you're ever in the SF Bay Area and would like to get together, drop
me a line.  I've met with Jeff a few times.
if any of you are ever in tokyo, i'd be down for meeting up for drinks 
or something.

alan


Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Re: MIT Spam conference

2004-12-21 Thread Jeff Chan
On Monday, December 20, 2004, 11:34:34 PM, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> William Stearns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> I'll be attending the MIT spam conference this year, Jan 21st, 
>> 9-5.  Details at http://www.spamconference.org/ .  The registration is 
>> free, but they suggest an early registration before the conference fills 
>> up.

> Last year, it was awesome to meet up with SpamAssassin developers and
> other anti-spam folks, but the MIT spam conference itself was
> disappointing for the second year in a row.  It:

>   - was full of poorly reviewed papers of anecdotal information
>   - was unbelievably cold (both inside and outside)
>   - uncomfortable to sit in circa-1965 wood chairs

>> I'd love a chance to meet other people working on spamassassin and 
>> surbl.  Is anyone else planning on attending?

> I'd love to meet you and other SURBL/SA people.  If you want to attend a
> peer-reviewed anti-spam conference with heating, a pleasant climate, and
> comfortable seating, I can definitely recommend CEAS.

> If you're ever in the SF Bay Area and would like to get together, drop
> me a line.  I've met with Jeff a few times.

> Daniel

Yes, CEAS was pretty good and it was nice to meet some of the
SA and anti-spam folks from around the world.  One of the flaws
is that it's not strictly focussed on spam, but some of the
related topics are at least tangentially interesting.


FWIW here's the Call for Papers from CEAS:
__

Subject: Conference on Email and Anti-Spam Preliminary Call for Papers
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 10:44:43 -0800
From: "Joshua Goodman" (MicroSoft)
To: 



 The Second Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS)
In Cooperation with 
 The International Association for Cryptologic Research and
The IEEE Technical Committee on Security and Privacy
 
Preliminary Call for Papers 

July 21-22, 2005 (Thurs,Fri) 
Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
http://www.ceas.cc  


General Conference Chair: Joshua Goodman (Microsoft Research)
 
Program Co-Chairs: 
*Josh Alspector (AOL) 
*Tom Fawcett (HP)
*Andrew McCallum (UMass) 

The Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS) invites the submission of
papers for its second meeting.  Papers are invited on all aspects of
email, instant messaging, cell phone text messaging, and voice over
internet protocol (VoIP).  This includes spam, spit (spam over
internet telephony), spim (spam over instant messenger), phishing and
identity theft via messaging, viruses, spyware, etc. including
research papers, industry reports, and law and policy papers.
 
Research: Computer science oriented academic-style research 
Industry: Descriptions of important or innovative products 
Law, Policy, and Economics: Legal, policy, and economic papers

* Research papers include experimental or theoretical, academic-style
papers on all aspects of messaging and abuses, including but not
limited to:

Techniques for stopping email, VoIP and IM spam, including 
Machine learning techniques 
Postage techniques 
Proof-of-work
Challenge-response
Human Interactive Proofs (or CAPTCHAs)
Disposable email addresses 
Protocols for sender authentication and verification 
Digital signatures 
Proof of group membership 
Role of spam as a malware vector 
Spam traceback
New features for email and messaging systems 
Automatic foldering of email 
Categorizing messages
Message search
Clustering messages
Advanced calendaring and scheduling 
Digital rights management for email and digital messages
Public Key Infrastructure for messaging

* Industry papers describe products or systems (commercial or open
source) and matters of commercial or practical interest.  Papers
claiming excellent results should include good experimental or
theoretical evidence supporting the claims.  Example topics include:

Industry cooperation for stopping messaging abuse
New standards and interoperability 
   For spam, spit, spim filters and authentication
   For calendaring and scheduling 
Public key infrastructure for encryption and identity 
Digital rights management 
New products, especially those with novel features

* Legal, policy and financial papers focus on topics such as 

What new laws or social institutions are most appropriate for
messaging?
Legal strategies against spam, phishing, and spyware
The CAN-SPAM act and potential FTC regulations 
International legal approaches 
What should be done about phishing and other message scams? 
The economics of spam, spim, spit, phishing
The economic effects of per-message charges (postage)
Email, IM, VoIP and identity: who should control it? 
Privacy for email, IM, VoIP, and chat
Messaging in the workplace.

* In all three areas, submissions closely related to mess

Re: MIT Spam conference

2004-12-21 Thread Daniel Quinlan
William Stearns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'll be attending the MIT spam conference this year, Jan 21st, 
> 9-5.  Details at http://www.spamconference.org/ .  The registration is 
> free, but they suggest an early registration before the conference fills 
> up.

Last year, it was awesome to meet up with SpamAssassin developers and
other anti-spam folks, but the MIT spam conference itself was
disappointing for the second year in a row.  It:

  - was full of poorly reviewed papers of anecdotal information
  - was unbelievably cold (both inside and outside)
  - uncomfortable to sit in circa-1965 wood chairs

> I'd love a chance to meet other people working on spamassassin and 
> surbl.  Is anyone else planning on attending?

I'd love to meet you and other SURBL/SA people.  If you want to attend a
peer-reviewed anti-spam conference with heating, a pleasant climate, and
comfortable seating, I can definitely recommend CEAS.

If you're ever in the SF Bay Area and would like to get together, drop
me a line.  I've met with Jeff a few times.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/


Re: [SURBL-Discuss] MIT Spam conference

2004-12-18 Thread Ryan Thompson
Yarg. I hate it when this happens. Maybe it's free, but it's still ~$600
to get me there and back, and I can't write it off or cover it
personally just now.
Ummm... Hey! Anybody want to pay me to program some stuff or write some
rules or something? :-) I'll take good notes. :-)
- Ryan
William Stearns wrote to ML-spamassassin-talk and ml-surbl-discuss on Fri,...:
Good day, all,
	I'll be attending the MIT spam conference this year, Jan 21st, 9-5. 
Details at http://www.spamconference.org/ .  The registration is free, but 
they suggest an early registration before the conference fills up.
	I'd love a chance to meet other people working on spamassassin and 
surbl.  Is anyone else planning on attending?
	Cheers,
	- Bill

---
"God grant me the senility to accept the things I cannot change,
The frustration to try to change things I cannot affect, and the wisdom
to tell the difference."
(Courtesy of Mike Ricketts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
--
William Stearns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).  Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f,
rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at:   http://www.stearns.org
--
___
Discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.surbl.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
  Ryan Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  SaskNow Technologies - http://www.sasknow.com
  901-1st Avenue North - Saskatoon, SK - S7K 1Y4
Tel: 306-664-3600   Fax: 306-244-7037   Saskatoon
  Toll-Free: 877-727-5669 (877-SASKNOW) North America


Re: MIT Spam conference

2004-12-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 04:39:49PM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
> Is anyone else planning on attending?

Already registered. :)

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
How do you make Windows faster? Throw it harder.


Re: MIT Spam conference

2004-12-17 Thread Jim Maul
Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William Stearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 3:53 PM
To: ML-spamassassin-talk; ml-surbl-discuss
Cc: William Stearns
Subject: MIT Spam conference
Good day, all,
	I'll be attending the MIT spam conference this year, Jan 21st, 
9-5.  Details at http://www.spamconference.org/ .  The registration is 
free, but they suggest an early registration before the 
conference fills 
up.
	I'd love a chance to meet other people working on 
spamassassin and 
surbl.  Is anyone else planning on attending?
	Cheers,
	- Bill

All registered. Unless we get some meltdown here, or my car feezes on the
way like last year, I'll be there! However, being a ninja, you won't see me!
:)  J/K, my goal is to get my eyeball as close to the webcast camera. Just
so when I come home I can DL the movie and say "There is my eyeball"
Do we get to bring air horns?
haha feeze?
http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/feeze
;)
Hey lemme know when your getting close to the camera, i wanna check it 
out too!

-Jim


RE: MIT Spam conference

2004-12-17 Thread Chris Santerre


>-Original Message-
>From: William Stearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 3:53 PM
>To: ML-spamassassin-talk; ml-surbl-discuss
>Cc: William Stearns
>Subject: MIT Spam conference
>
>
>Good day, all,
>   I'll be attending the MIT spam conference this year, Jan 21st, 
>9-5.  Details at http://www.spamconference.org/ .  The registration is 
>free, but they suggest an early registration before the 
>conference fills 
>up.
>   I'd love a chance to meet other people working on 
>spamassassin and 
>surbl.  Is anyone else planning on attending?
>   Cheers,
>   - Bill

All registered. Unless we get some meltdown here, or my car feezes on the
way like last year, I'll be there! However, being a ninja, you won't see me!
:)  J/K, my goal is to get my eyeball as close to the webcast camera. Just
so when I come home I can DL the movie and say "There is my eyeball"

Do we get to bring air horns?

Chris Santerre 
System Admin and SARE/SURBL Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin 


MIT Spam conference

2004-12-17 Thread William Stearns
Good day, all,
	I'll be attending the MIT spam conference this year, Jan 21st, 
9-5.  Details at http://www.spamconference.org/ .  The registration is 
free, but they suggest an early registration before the conference fills 
up.
	I'd love a chance to meet other people working on spamassassin and 
surbl.  Is anyone else planning on attending?
	Cheers,
	- Bill

---
"God grant me the senility to accept the things I cannot change,
The frustration to try to change things I cannot affect, and the wisdom
to tell the difference."
(Courtesy of Mike Ricketts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
--
William Stearns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).  Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f,
rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at:   http://www.stearns.org
--