Re: RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID false-positives?
mouss wrote: Per Jessen wrote: Is anyone using the CompleteWhois info? I have reduced the score to 0.5 (did that a long time ago, so I don't have the corresponding FPs at hands). OK, thanks - I was just wondering how much I should really trust/value the CompleteWhois info. /Per Jessen, Zürich
Re: RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID false-positives?
Per Jessen wrote: Recently I seem to be getting more than the usual batch of FPs, which I've tracked to be due to RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID giving 2.2 points. According to the explanation, it reports an IP on an invalid block - RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID RBL: CompleteWhois: sender on invalid IP * block [202.96.189.57 listed in combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com] According to whois info, this ip address is in China and there's nothing wrong with it. what do you mean? if they bounce mail sent to the whois contact, then they have a misconfigured system. http://cwhois0.completewhois.com/cgi-bin/dbcheck-invalidipwhois.cgi?IP=202.96.189.57Submit=Check+Invalid+Whois+Database Is anyone using the CompleteWhois info? I have reduced the score to 0.5 (did that a long time ago, so I don't have the corresponding FPs at hands).
RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID false-positives?
Recently I seem to be getting more than the usual batch of FPs, which I've tracked to be due to RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID giving 2.2 points. According to the explanation, it reports an IP on an invalid block - RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID RBL: CompleteWhois: sender on invalid IP * block [202.96.189.57 listed in combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com] According to whois info, this ip address is in China and there's nothing wrong with it. Is anyone using the CompleteWhois info? /Per Jessen, Zürich