RE: New bayes poison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The spammer used the Yahoo! webmail infrastructure (probably via an automated HTTP client) to send his spam. I've been reporting spam with good DK signatures to the mail provider: http://add.yahoo.com/fast/help/us/mail/cgi_spam require a login for reporing of abuse :( https://services.google.com/inquiry/gmail_security2 good
Re: New bayes poison
On Thursday, Apr 13th 2006 at 17:53 -0400, quoth Theo Van Dinter: =On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:45:07PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote: = ?0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME ? ? Domain Keys: policy says domain signs = some mails 0.0 DK_POLICY_TESTING ? ? ?Domain Keys: policy says domain = is testing DK 0.0 DK_SIGNED ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Domain Keys: message has a = signature -0.0 DK_VERIFIED ? ? ? ? ? ?Domain Keys: signature passes = = Where to get these rules? = =They're standard in 3.1 if you have enabled the =Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys plugin. I added the following line to my init.pre and when I restart sa I get these in my maillog. Apr 14 09:26:04 saturn spamd[14286]: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DomainKeys.pm line 44. Apr 14 09:26:04 saturn spamd[14286]: Compilation failed in require at (eval 21) line 1. Apr 14 09:26:04 saturn spamd[14286]: plugin: failed to create instance of plugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys: Can't locate object method new via package Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys at (eval 22) line 1. But when I try to install the missing package it says: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys is up to date (undef). Any advice? -- steveo at syslang dot net TMMP1 http://frambors.syslang.net/ Do you have neighbors who are not frambors?
Re: New bayes poison
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:33:10AM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: I added the following line to my init.pre The line is already in v310.pre, you can just uncomment it. Apr 14 09:26:04 saturn spamd[14286]: BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DomainKeys.pm line 44. Apr 14 09:26:04 saturn spamd[14286]: Compilation failed in require at (eval 21) line 1. Do you have the required Mail::DomainKeys module installed (as listed in the INSTALL doc)? -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Computers run on faith, not electrons. pgpt0evVgd4T3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: New bayes poison
Good afternoon, Michael, On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Michael Monnerie wrote: Hi, I just received some new bayes poison attempt. I never had one so large, maybe that could start to be a bit of problem? To the best of my knowledge, it isn't. Temporarily you get more hapaxes (tokens seen just once) in your bayes data, but those will get expired sooner or later. There's no effect on accuracy if the tokens truly are seen once. If they show up again in spam, it actually helps because the phrases help identify the second spam. Cheers, - Bill --- Computers let you make more mistakes faster than any other invention in human history, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila. -- Mitch Radcliffe (Courtesy of Hugo van der Kooij [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- William Stearns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Mason, Buildkernel, freedups, p0f, rsync-backup, ssh-keyinstall, dns-check, more at: http://www.stearns.org --
RE: New bayes poison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The spammer used the Yahoo! webmail infrastructure (probably via an automated HTTP client) to send his spam. I've been reporting spam with good DK signatures to the mail provider: http://add.yahoo.com/fast/help/us/mail/cgi_spam https://services.google.com/inquiry/gmail_security2 DK and SPF are very useful in proving accountability for email sent. -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Re: New bayes poison
On Donnerstag, 13. April 2006 19:05 Justin Mason wrote: 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails 0.0 DK_POLICY_TESTING Domain Keys: policy says domain is testing DK 0.0 DK_SIGNED Domain Keys: message has a signature -0.0 DK_VERIFIED Domain Keys: signature passes verification Where to get these rules? mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660/4156531 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi3.asc | gpg --import // Fingerprint: 44A3 C1EC B71E C71A B4C2 9AA6 C818 847C 55CB A4EE // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x55CBA4EE pgpzTGsQwGKdS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: New bayes poison
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:45:07PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote: 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails 0.0 DK_POLICY_TESTING Domain Keys: policy says domain is testing DK 0.0 DK_SIGNED Domain Keys: message has a signature -0.0 DK_VERIFIED Domain Keys: signature passes Where to get these rules? They're standard in 3.1 if you have enabled the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys plugin. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Note that I am a proponent of Zen in the Art of Systems Administration, and thus believe that it's appropriate to present yourself as a beginner in all things. This helps you keep a fresh perspective and spank the unsuspecting at snooker. - Benjy Feen pgppCURvZeVng.pgp Description: PGP signature
