Re: can Pyzor run localy?
Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Alan Shine wrote:>> Hi,>> I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.>> >> 1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the >> message with local repository, not with the Pyzor web servers) ?>See: http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/>Since the entire system is released under the GPL, people are free to >host their own independent servers. Server peering is planned for a >future release.What I meant in my first question is: dnsrbld can import localy the zone files - via rsync, can pyzord do the same? - I already understood that pyzord can be installed any where, but can it import the signature files localy? >> 2.I would like to activate more features to SA (I currently use only >> SARE rules).>> We are considering SURBL, DCC and Pyzor. >> My question is - what are the preferable features that I can add to SA, >> that will result in better spam identification, and that will cost the >> lowest in performance time?>Probably SURBL but if you are going to enable network tests it is best >to have as many activated as possible from the start.>http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SingleUserUnixInstall __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: can Pyzor run localy?
Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Alan Shine wrote:>> Hi,>> I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.>> >> 1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the >> message with local repository, not with the Pyzor web servers) ?>See: http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/>Since the entire system is released under the GPL, people are free to >host their own independent servers. Server peering is planned for a >future release.What I meant in my first question is: dnsrbld can import localy the zone files - via rsync, can pyzord do the same? - I already understood that pyzord can be installed any where, but can it import the signature files localy? >> 2.I would like to activate more features to SA (I currently use only >> SARE rules).>> We are considering SURBL, DCC and Pyzor. >> My question is - what are the preferable features that I can add to SA, >> that will result in better spam identification, and that will cost the >> lowest in performance time?>Probably SURBL but if you are going to enable network tests it is best >to have as many activated as possible from the start.>http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SingleUserUnixInstall __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: can Pyzor run localy?
Alan Shine wrote: Hi, I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures. 1. Can Pyzord run localy as SURBL does with rbldnsd (check the message with local repository, not with the Pyzor web servers) ? See: http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/ Since the entire system is released under the GPL, people are free to host their own independent servers. Server peering is planned for a future release. 2.I would like to activate more features to SA (I currently use only SARE rules). We are considering SURBL, DCC and Pyzor. My question is - what are the preferable features that I can add to SA, that will result in better spam identification, and that will cost the lowest in performance time? Probably SURBL but if you are going to enable network tests it is best to have as many activated as possible from the start. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SingleUserUnixInstall
