Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
--On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 4:27 PM -0600 Chris Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod I'm guessing the make install step in the RPM spec file did this. It shouldn't touch the live system, though, so a bugzilla should be filed about this.
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
--On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 4:27 PM -0600 Chris Barnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No dice - downloaded and when I ran the:
rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.1.tar.gz
I got:
warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod
Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/spamassassin-3.0.1-1.i386.rpm
SA isn't running at all now.
This sounds like you rebuilt the RPM as root and something in the rebuild
procedure isn't root-safe and clobbered the live system. I only rebuild
RPM's as a mortal.
To package as a mortal, create the file ~/.rpmmacros and put in it the
lines:
%_topdir /home/buildmeister/rpm
%buildroot %{_topdir}/var/tmp
where buildmeister is the user who will be building RPM's. Create ~/rpm and
under that create directories BUILD, RPMS, SOURCES, SPECS, SRPMS, and var.
Now run the rpmbuild command as user buildmeister and the process will be
sandboxed in those directories.
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 4:27 PM -0600 Chris Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod I'm guessing the make install step in the RPM spec file did this. It shouldn't touch the live system, though, so a bugzilla should be filed about this. Ok, I haven't the foggiest idea how to do that. -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 08:49:01AM -0600, Chris Barnes wrote: warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod I'm guessing the make install step in the RPM spec file did this. It shouldn't touch the live system, though, so a bugzilla should be filed about this. I don't think there's a way to avoid the perllocal.pod bit (if there is, somebody tell me!) The real lesson here is: don't build RPMs as root if you want to make sure nothing on the system will be modified by the build. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Windows 98 supports real multitasking - it can boot and crash simultaneously. - Bernhard Rosenkraenzer pgpFV4Hyr37i2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
When SA 3.0 became available, I upgraded from the Redhat RPM's, and had various problems with versions and functionality. I removed the RPM and upgraded via CPAN with absolutely no issues. Ben Hanson I.S. MGR Transprint USA Inc.
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
--On Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:16 AM -0500 Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think there's a way to avoid the perllocal.pod bit (if there is, somebody tell me!) The real lesson here is: don't build RPMs as root if you want to make sure nothing on the system will be modified by the build. Even if that was modified, it shouldn't show up in the list of unpackaged files unless the build root was set to /. A check of files in /usr/lib/rpm suggests that it's not set by default, so unless the spec file suggests a default, you can hose the live system. It looks like spamassassin.spec sets it to /var/tmp/spamassassin-root which should be safe, so I don't see how a file in /usr/lib/perl5 is getting inspected.
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
Chris Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how do I go about resurrecting SA so that it runs now? Just for grins, I downloaded the CPAN version (which shows to be 3.0.2) and used the instructions there. The install went off without any error messages, but I get the same results as before. Fwiw, issuing the command spamassassin -V gives me: SpamAssassin version 3.0.2 running on Perl version 5.8.3 -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
--On Thursday, December 16, 2004 11:19 AM -0600 Chris Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for grins, I downloaded the CPAN version (which shows to be 3.0.2) and used the instructions there. The install went off without any error messages, but I get the same results as before. IOW, sa-learn still fails? What about SA itself? Does it work against the sample messages?
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IOW, sa-learn still fails? What about SA itself? Does it work against the sample messages? Nope. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2]# spamassassin sample-nonspam.txt Created user preferences file: /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 730. Use of uninitialized value in bitwise and () at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 640. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 678. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 678. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 678. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 678. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 678. Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 678. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 707. unknown type for RCVD_IN_4: 18 at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1682. -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:42:29AM -0600, Chris Barnes wrote: Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IOW, sa-learn still fails? What about SA itself? Does it work against the sample messages? Nope. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2]# spamassassin sample-nonspam.txt Created user preferences file: /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at Just checking, you did read UPGRADE right? Run spamassassin --lint and fixed any problems? Michael pgpWLL7hfjnRS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x (SOLVED)
I went ahead and filed a bugzilla report and there Theo made the comment: At first glance, it looks like you have a bad configuration. This was probably and off-handed remark, but for me it provided a good clue. I renamed my old /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf to .old and copied the local.cf.rpmbuild to local.cf and used it 'as-is'. Restarted SA and everything now works. Perhaps something in the UPDATE file and website should be included to only re-used old custom rules only after the install/upgrade? -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
Does anyone have a good yum update repository to upgrade SA to 3.x (from 2.63)? Is an update like that recommended? -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
--On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 3:11 PM -0600 Chris Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have a good yum update repository to upgrade SA to 3.x (from 2.63)? Is an update like that recommended? I haven't used Red Hat's SA packages for some time. Just grab the tarball from the SA site and rebuild it into an RPM with the command line provided on the download page. I've been using that from RH7.2 through FC2, now with SA 3.0. (Have to get around to upgrading to 3.0.1, but might wait for 3.0.2.)
Re: Yum update of SA from 2.63 to 3.0x
Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't used Red Hat's SA packages for some time. Just grab the tarball from the SA site and rebuild it into an RPM with the command line provided on the download page. I've been using that from RH7.2 through FC2, now with SA 3.0. (Have to get around to upgrading to 3.0.1, but might wait for 3.0.2.) No dice - downloaded and when I ran the: rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.1.tar.gz I got: warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/spamassassin-3.0.1-1.i386.rpm SA isn't running at all now. Just as a test I tried to issue a sa-learn --dump magic and got the following output: Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 678. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 707. === the above were repeated many times === unknown type for RCVD_IN_4: 18 at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1671. -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
