Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go?
> since rulesrc is independent of the SA distribution. Good to know. Perhaps I *should* know. Can't find that stated/clarified anywhere in the src tree. I've looked repeatedly. If it's supposed to be obvious, i'm clueless. My -- incorrect -- presumption has been, since its DISTRIBUTED *with* SA, it's change-managed along with it. Could that be stated clearly somewhere? Perhaps a README.RULES in the src tree top?
Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go?
> > also, when did plugins move (back?) to rulesrc/sandbox/... as opposed > > to rules/...? > > I suspect you had the output of a "mkrules" compilation step in > your "rules" dir; they were always there, in the sandbox, but > mkrules copies them into "rules". bingo. i always build SA from src w/, cd ${SA_SRC} perl Makefile.PL ... cd spamc perl version.h.pl ./configure --enable-ssl ... make and note afterwards, cd ${SA_SRC} ls -1 rules/*.pm rules/SIQ.pm rules/sandbox-felicity.pm rules/sandbox-hstern.pm i did *not* realize that mkrules is the 'culprit', but i *do* see it in Makefile.PL. (need to look more closely at what's going on so as not to fubar my setup ... ) thanks!
Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go?
snowcrash+sa writes: > fair enuf. > > where are such removals documented? my point being simply: it *was* > in the src tree, suddenly it isn't. even if well-justified, shouln't > that action be *mentioned* in Changelog? svn log. It was never a released file. > also, when did plugins move (back?) to rulesrc/sandbox/... as opposed > to rules/...? I suspect you had the output of a "mkrules" compilation step in your "rules" dir; they were always there, in the sandbox, but mkrules copies them into "rules". --j.
Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:22:41AM -0700, snowcrash+sa wrote: > where are such removals documented? my point being simply: it *was* > in the src tree, suddenly it isn't. even if well-justified, shouln't > that action be *mentioned* in Changelog? It'll be in the svn log info for the rulesrc (aka repo/spamassassin/rules) directory. You wouldn't see those changes in the Changes file, for instance, since rulesrc is independent of the SA distribution. > also, when did plugins move (back?) to rulesrc/sandbox/... as opposed > to rules/...? plugins have never been in the rules dir. they're either in a sandbox or in the lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugins dir. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: Bender: Oh, Lord, I'm on the verge of a nervous melt-down. pgpD59e3qjn7p.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go?
fair enuf. where are such removals documented? my point being simply: it *was* in the src tree, suddenly it isn't. even if well-justified, shouln't that action be *mentioned* in Changelog? also, when did plugins move (back?) to rulesrc/sandbox/... as opposed to rules/...?
Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go?
it was a sandbox plugin that didn't work, hence, now gone. --j. snowcrash+sa writes: > hi, > > i've a script that keeps me up to date with latest 32x-branch svn. > > in today's DL/co of r570165 > > > svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2 spamassassin > > > i note that, > > rules/SIQ.pm > rules/SendmailID.pm > > are no longer there (iirc, they were 'fairly recently' ...) . > > i *do* find > > rulesrc/sandbox/dos/SIQ.pm > > but no trace of SendmailID.pm. > > 'egrep -i "rulesrc|Sendmail" *' on the src tree doesn't tell me anything ... > > can someone clarify what's changed, and where'd "they" go? if the > change is doc'd somewhere, i've missed it ... > > thanks!
where'd SendmailID.pm go?
hi, i've a script that keeps me up to date with latest 32x-branch svn. in today's DL/co of r570165 svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2 spamassassin i note that, rules/SIQ.pm rules/SendmailID.pm are no longer there (iirc, they were 'fairly recently' ...) . i *do* find rulesrc/sandbox/dos/SIQ.pm but no trace of SendmailID.pm. 'egrep -i "rulesrc|Sendmail" *' on the src tree doesn't tell me anything ... can someone clarify what's changed, and where'd "they" go? if the change is doc'd somewhere, i've missed it ... thanks!