question about --revision DATE

[Geoffrey Myers]

I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me:

 svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02}

r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines



svn log --revision {2010-12-01}:{2010-12-02}

r5137 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:22:17 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines


r5138 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:48:54 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 5 lines


r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines


--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson

Re: question about --revision DATE

[Geoffrey Myers]

Andy Levy wrote:

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers
 wrote:

I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me:

 svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02}

r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines



svn log --revision {2010-12-01}:{2010-12-02}

r5137 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:22:17 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines


r5138 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:48:54 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 5 lines


r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines


http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.tour.revs.specifiers.html#svn.tour.revs.dates

Especially the "Is Subversion a day early?" box.



Okay, but why does the first return a single record, and the second 
return 3?  I would expect the first to return either nothing or 3.


--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson

Re: question about --revision DATE

[Geoffrey Myers]

Andy Levy wrote:

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:55, Geoffrey Myers
 wrote:

Andy Levy wrote:

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 13:21, Geoffrey Myers
 wrote:

I'm hoping someone can explain the following output to me:

 svn log --revision {2010-12-02}:{2010-12-02}

r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines



svn log --revision {2010-12-01}:{2010-12-02}

r5137 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:22:17 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines


r5138 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 20:48:54 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 5 lines


r5139 | esoteric | 2010-12-01 21:27:31 -0500 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010) | 2 lines


http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.tour.revs.specifiers.html#svn.tour.revs.dates

Especially the "Is Subversion a day early?" box.


Okay, but why does the first return a single record, and the second return
3?  I would expect the first to return either nothing or 3.


Because it's the most recent revision as of the date you gave.




Thanks.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson

added branch disappears?

[Geoffrey Myers]

Can anyone shed light on this issue?

1. create new branch 'foo'
2. merge different branch 'bar' into trunk
3. merge trunk into all other existing branches

Seems that the branch foo disappeared sometime between 2 and 3.  have 
the commit email showing I created the branch, so I'm dumbfounded here.


Any insights would be appreciated.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson

Re: added branch disappears?

[Geoffrey Myers]

On 03/13/2012 04:14 PM, Bob Archer wrote:

Can anyone shed light on this issue?

1. create new branch 'foo'
2. merge different branch 'bar' into trunk 3. merge trunk into all other 
existing
branches

Seems that the branch foo disappeared sometime between 2 and 3.  have the
commit email showing I created the branch, so I'm dumbfounded here.

Any insights would be appreciated.


Did you branch to the repository or to the working copy? If you didn't commit 
the branch it wouldn't have gone into the repo.


branched to the repository:

svn copy svn+ssh://matrix/team/tree/app/trunk
svn+ssh://matrix/team/tree/trunk/branches/819
-m 'Create a development branch'


We have a commit hook, so it definitely was commited.


BOb




--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson

Re: added branch disappears?

[Geoffrey Myers]

On 03/13/2012 04:51 PM, Bob Archer wrote:

On 03/13/2012 04:14 PM, Bob Archer wrote:

Can anyone shed light on this issue?

1. create new branch 'foo'
2. merge different branch 'bar' into trunk 3. merge trunk into all
other existing branches

Seems that the branch foo disappeared sometime between 2 and 3.  have
the commit email showing I created the branch, so I'm dumbfounded here.

Any insights would be appreciated.


Did you branch to the repository or to the working copy? If you didn't commit

the branch it wouldn't have gone into the repo.

branched to the repository:

svn copy svn+ssh://matrix/team/tree/app/trunk
svn+ssh://matrix/team/tree/trunk/branches/819
-m 'Create a development branch'


We have a commit hook, so it definitely was commited.




Ok, so check the log.. it's either still there or someone deleted it so it 
doesn't show up in HEAD.


I can not find any reference to it in the logs.  Yet, I do have the 
commit email, so I know the commit worked.


This really concerns me.  I can recreate the branch, but really want to 
figure out what happened here.




BOb




--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson

Re: SVN as DMS

[Geoffrey Myers]

Check out 1mage.

That is the number one followed by 'mage'

It's not a typo.

On 03/21/2012 07:20 AM, Phil Pinkerton wrote:

SharePoint for documentation. As Subversion has no built-in search
attribute so to speak, however there are 3rd party application that
claim to search Subversion,
but why go thorough all that. I here there have been substantial
improvement is the SharePoint application.

2 cents

On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Laura Mohiuddin wrote:


Dear Sir/Madam,

My company IBCS-PRIMAX Software (BD) Ltd. (http://www.ibcs-primax.com
) is looking to install a Document
Management System for the organization. I suggested SVN, but the DMS
should also come with a dashboard and search facilities. Is there any
way that I can setup subversion to provide me with a dashboard and
search facilities?

Thank you for your kind cooperation

Regards,
--
*Laura Mohiuddin***
Manager, Marketing
IBCS-PRIMAX Software (Bangladesh) Limited
House # 51, Road # 10A, Dhanmondi R/A
Dhaka – 1209, Bangladesh
Web: http://www.ibcs-primax.com 





--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson

Put a tag in the wrong place

[Geoffrey Myers]

I created a tag in my branches directory, can I simply move it to the 
tags directory?  My google foo was not successful.


--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson

Re: Put a tag in the wrong place

[Geoffrey Myers]

On 04/25/2012 11:22 AM, Andy Levy wrote:

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:12, Geoffrey Myers
  wrote:

I created a tag in my branches directory, can I simply move it to the tags
directory?  My google foo was not successful.


Yes. Subversion preserves history through copies&  moves.


Thanks, I thought as much, but wanted to get a warm and fuzzy feeling 
about it first.



--
Until later, Geoffrey

"I predict future happiness for America if they can prevent
the government from wasting the labors of the people under
the pretense of taking care of them."
- Thomas Jefferson