Re: T5: page redirect
wow, and i think i must be crazy and nobody believes me !!
Mit freundlichem Gruss
homburg Softwaretechnik
S.Homburg
21220 Seevetal / GERMANY
Fon: +49-4105-669746
Fax: +49-4105-668947
Bill Holloway schrieb:
I'm having the same trouble. My Start page inherits from ProtectedPage:
public abstract class ProtectedPage
{
@InjectPage
private Login _loginPage;
@ApplicationState
private AppState _state;
Object onActivate ()
{
if (! _state.isLoggedIn())
{
_loginPage.setCallback (this);
return _loginPage;
}
return null;
}
}
Start has an empty class, no members, just a template. The Login
works fine. Everything is OK under Jetty (logged in or logged out) as
long as I call localhost:8080/start, but if I'm not logged in, a
call to localhost:8080 gets me a blank page. Introducing Login tmp =
_loginPage at the beginning of onActivate and watching that in a
debug session shows a good _loginPage variable. But BOOM.
Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T5 Block Rendering
This works: div t:type=EmptyFrame t:id=myFrame centerBlock=block:centerBlock/div t:block t:id=centerBlockSomething/t:block But T5 complains that the component doesn't have a Block with id=centerBlock in this case: div t:type=EmptyFrame t:id=myFrame centerBlock=block:centerBlock t:block t:id=centerBlockSomething/t:block /div And has the same complaint for this: t:block t:id=centerBlockSomething/t:block div t:type=EmptyFrame t:id=myFrame centerBlock=block:centerBlock/div Coming from Tap4 land, this seems a little strange. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5-Block-Rendering-tf3935992.html#a11163113 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5 Block Rendering
It's a little confusing and although what it does now is correct, I may fix it. div t:type=EmptyFrame t:id=myFrame centerBlock=block:centerBlock t:block id=centerBlockSomething/t:block /div t:id is just for components. For blocks, a simple id will sufffice, and is all that's accepted. It should be generating a parse error for your syntax. Further for what you are trying to do, I've tried to make it easy: div t:type=EmptyFrame t:id=myFrame t:parameter name=centerBlock Something /t:parameter /div t:parameter is used to define a Block and bind it to a parameter all in one go. On 6/17/07, Jeremy F. Kassis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This works: div t:type=EmptyFrame t:id=myFrame centerBlock=block:centerBlock/div t:block t:id=centerBlockSomething/t:block But T5 complains that the component doesn't have a Block with id=centerBlock in this case: div t:type=EmptyFrame t:id=myFrame centerBlock=block:centerBlock t:block t:id=centerBlockSomething/t:block /div And has the same complaint for this: t:block t:id=centerBlockSomething/t:block div t:type=EmptyFrame t:id=myFrame centerBlock=block:centerBlock/div Coming from Tap4 land, this seems a little strange. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5-Block-Rendering-tf3935992.html#a11163113 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard M. Lewis Ship TWD Consulting, Inc. Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Apache HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T5 encoding issue
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 10:38 +0200, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
In case you are using Tomcat try adding URIEncoding=UTF-8 to your
connector definition in server.xml.
I just tried that, but it does not solve the problem.
I have added a servlet filter that prints the requested uri to
the std out, just to see what is the input for T5.
The URIEncoding=UTF-8 does not change what's printed by the
filter, but the argument that's passed to my page class' onActivate
is different.
Without URIEncoding=UTF-8:
[INFO ] 2007-06-17 22:52:37,956 http-8080-1
org.comp.proj.presentation.util.EncodingFilter.doFilter:
- uri: /shopping24-shop/search/tr%C3%BCb
- path: null
[INFO ] 2007-06-17 22:52:51,303 http-8080-1
org.comp.proj.presentation.pages.Search.onActivate:
Got invoked args tr??b
With URIEncoding=UTF-8:
[INFO ] 2007-06-17 22:54:33,398 http-8080-1
org.comp.proj.presentation.util.EncodingFilter.doFilter:
uri: /shopping24-shop/search/tr%C3%BCb
[INFO ] 2007-06-17 22:54:44,620 http-8080-1
org.comp.proj.presentation.pages.Search.onActivate:
Got invoked args tr?b
Is there anything else that I could do to get the correct
decoding of the request parameters / uri?
Thanx cheers,
Martin
Uli
On Mo, 11.06.2007, 23:13, Martin Grotzke sagte:
Hi,
I have currently an encoding issue, but am not really sure what's
the reason for this.
I have an url that contains a url encoded german umlaut (ü) in UTF-8
and looks like the following:
http://localhost:8080/app/search/%C3%BCbel (the %C3%BC represents the ü
in UTF-8, this url is created by
componentResources.createPageLink( search, new Object[]{ _query } )
in the submit method of the search page)
Now, when I look in the onActivate(string) method, the string is not
übel but it's ?bel, both printed via logging as when I inspect the
variable during debugging.
AFAICS the created url from the page link is correct in terms of utf-8
encoding, but the parsed query string seems to be wrong, as it contains
only the ?...
We have the following in our AppModule:
public void contributeRequestHandler(
OrderedConfigurationRequestFilter configuration,
@InjectService(TimingFilter)
final RequestFilter filter, @InjectService(Utf8Filter)
final RequestFilter utf8Filter ) {
configuration.add( Timing, filter );
configuration.add( Utf8Filter, utf8Filter ); // handle UTF-8
}
public RequestFilter buildUtf8Filter(
@InjectService(RequestGlobals)
final RequestGlobals requestGlobals ) {
return new RequestFilter() {
public boolean service( Request request, Response response,
RequestHandler handler ) throws IOException {
requestGlobals.getHTTPServletRequest().setCharacterEncoding(
UTF-8 );
return handler.service( request, response );
}
};
}
public static PageResponseRenderer decoratePageResponseRenderer(
@InjectService(PageMarkupRenderer)
final PageMarkupRenderer markupRenderer,
@InjectService(MarkupWriterFactory)
final MarkupWriterFactory markupWriterFactory, final Object
delegate ) {
return new PageResponseRenderer() {
public void renderPageResponse( Page page, Response response )
throws IOException {
MarkupWriter writer =
markupWriterFactory.newMarkupWriter();
markupRenderer.renderPageMarkup( page, writer );
PrintWriter pw = response
.getPrintWriter( text/html; charset=UTF-8 );
writer.toMarkup( pw );
pw.flush();
}
};
}
Is there anything wrong, or what am I missing?
Thanx cheers,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: T5 encoding issue
I just stepped through the sources to see where the URI get's
decoded to the activation context arguments, and found that the
o.a.t.internal.services.PageRenderDispatcher.dispatch invokes
convertActivationContext with the path info to convert it to
the activation context args.
convertActivationContext uses TapestryInternalUtils.urlDecode
which invokes URLCodec.decode. It seems that this causes the
problem, but I cannot say what exactly is the reason.
When I remove the invocation of TapestryInternalUtils.urlDecode
everything's fine...
Any help with this issue?
Thanx cheers,
Martin
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 23:01 +0200, Martin Grotzke wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 10:38 +0200, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
In case you are using Tomcat try adding URIEncoding=UTF-8 to your
connector definition in server.xml.
I just tried that, but it does not solve the problem.
I have added a servlet filter that prints the requested uri to
the std out, just to see what is the input for T5.
The URIEncoding=UTF-8 does not change what's printed by the
filter, but the argument that's passed to my page class' onActivate
is different.
Without URIEncoding=UTF-8:
[INFO ] 2007-06-17 22:52:37,956 http-8080-1
org.comp.proj.presentation.util.EncodingFilter.doFilter:
- uri: /shopping24-shop/search/tr%C3%BCb
- path: null
[INFO ] 2007-06-17 22:52:51,303 http-8080-1
org.comp.proj.presentation.pages.Search.onActivate:
Got invoked args tr??b
With URIEncoding=UTF-8:
[INFO ] 2007-06-17 22:54:33,398 http-8080-1
org.comp.proj.presentation.util.EncodingFilter.doFilter:
uri: /shopping24-shop/search/tr%C3%BCb
[INFO ] 2007-06-17 22:54:44,620 http-8080-1
org.comp.proj.presentation.pages.Search.onActivate:
Got invoked args tr?b
Is there anything else that I could do to get the correct
decoding of the request parameters / uri?
Thanx cheers,
Martin
Uli
On Mo, 11.06.2007, 23:13, Martin Grotzke sagte:
Hi,
I have currently an encoding issue, but am not really sure what's
the reason for this.
I have an url that contains a url encoded german umlaut (ü) in UTF-8
and looks like the following:
http://localhost:8080/app/search/%C3%BCbel (the %C3%BC represents the ü
in UTF-8, this url is created by
componentResources.createPageLink( search, new Object[]{ _query } )
in the submit method of the search page)
Now, when I look in the onActivate(string) method, the string is not
übel but it's ?bel, both printed via logging as when I inspect the
variable during debugging.
AFAICS the created url from the page link is correct in terms of utf-8
encoding, but the parsed query string seems to be wrong, as it contains
only the ?...
We have the following in our AppModule:
public void contributeRequestHandler(
OrderedConfigurationRequestFilter configuration,
@InjectService(TimingFilter)
final RequestFilter filter, @InjectService(Utf8Filter)
final RequestFilter utf8Filter ) {
configuration.add( Timing, filter );
configuration.add( Utf8Filter, utf8Filter ); // handle UTF-8
}
public RequestFilter buildUtf8Filter(
@InjectService(RequestGlobals)
final RequestGlobals requestGlobals ) {
return new RequestFilter() {
public boolean service( Request request, Response response,
RequestHandler handler ) throws IOException {
requestGlobals.getHTTPServletRequest().setCharacterEncoding(
UTF-8 );
return handler.service( request, response );
}
};
}
public static PageResponseRenderer decoratePageResponseRenderer(
@InjectService(PageMarkupRenderer)
final PageMarkupRenderer markupRenderer,
@InjectService(MarkupWriterFactory)
final MarkupWriterFactory markupWriterFactory, final Object
delegate ) {
return new PageResponseRenderer() {
public void renderPageResponse( Page page, Response response )
throws IOException {
MarkupWriter writer =
markupWriterFactory.newMarkupWriter();
markupRenderer.renderPageMarkup( page, writer );
PrintWriter pw = response
.getPrintWriter( text/html; charset=UTF-8 );
writer.toMarkup( pw );
pw.flush();
}
};
}
Is there anything wrong, or what am I missing?
Thanx cheers,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Grotzke
http://www.javakaffee.de/blog/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [T5.0.5] Replacement for tapestry.test.pagelevel.NoOpURLEncoder ?
Yes, a bunch of those APIs were consolidated back into Request and
Response. They were broken out that way by Kent to support the
PageTester, but I found a way to put humpty dumpty back together again
while keeping PageTester happy.
On 6/15/07, Daniel Jue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the source code for this class in the online api-docs, but it
doesn't appear to be in the current snapshot. I believe it was around
back in 5.0.4. Has something better replaced it? Can I just use
ResponseImpl with no ill repercussions?
I came across it when trying to use some T5 Acegi code that was posted
on the list:
...
Object onSuccessFromLoginForm() {
Link acegiLoginLink = new LinkImpl(new NoOpURLEncoder(),
jumpstart,
j_security_check);
acegiLoginLink.addParameter(j_username, username);
acegiLoginLink.addParameter(j_password, password);
return acegiLoginLink;
}
...
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind
Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T3 binding issue for DatePicker
If I use the following code in my html and the page then get the following error: Html template: 82 tr 83 thspan jwcid=@FieldLabel field=ognl:components.inputUserActiveDate Active Date/span/th 84 th Active Date/th 85tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td 86 /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker static-binding name=displayName value=Active Date / binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Error from Tapestry: Display name not specified and not provided by field UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate. binding: ExpressionBinding[UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate cachedValue=org.apache.tapestry.form. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/inputUserActiveDate]] component: org.apache.tapestry.valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/$FieldLabel$4] location: context:/WEB-INF/UserMaint.html, line 83 If I use the following code then I don’t get any error and the UserMaint page displays ok but when I submit the form then get null for the nputUserActiveDate. It seems binding not done properly. Html template: tr th Active Date/th tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Please help. Naz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tapestry-1.0.0 on any mirror?
It should be soon(whenever they rsync the mirrors, assuming 24-48hrs), when it does show up you should see it here as version 4.1.2. http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/tapestry/tapestry-test/ On 6/12/07, Peter Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi jesse, you wrote, that you wanted to push a version to ibiblio mirror. i didnt find it jet?! kind regards peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com
T4 wml servlet context
Dear all, my application has 2 contexts. on web.xml i have these lines servlet servlet-nameMReunion/servlet-name servlet-classorg.apache.tapestry.ApplicationServlet /servlet-class load-on-startup1/load-on-startup /servlet servlet-mapping servlet-nameMReunion/servlet-name url-pattern/app/url-pattern /servlet-mapping servlet servlet-namewap/servlet-name servlet-classorg.apache.tapestry.ApplicationServlet /servlet-class /servlet servlet-mapping servlet-nameMReunion/servlet-name url-pattern/app/url-pattern /servlet-mapping servlet-mapping servlet-namewap/servlet-name url-pattern/wap/app/url-pattern /servlet-mapping and my Home.wml has these go jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Go stateful=ognl:false listener=listener:submit postfield jwcid=[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Postfield name=ognl: components.userInput.name value=ognl:username/ /go i put my wap application under WEB-INF/wap dir the problem is, the Go component on my Home.wml is always refers to MReunion/app context instead of MReunion/wap/app context so it can't get the right page to display because it searches on the wrong context. I access the page with http://localhost/MReunion/wap/app, and when i clicked it, it went to http://localhost/MReunion/app with error message how to solve this problem? thanks for any help Mawaddah Web Application Developer Nurulfikri Software Development Jakarta-Indonesia
Re: T3 binding issue for DatePicker
Hi Naz. You're getting confused between DatePicker and DateField. Cheers, Nick. Nazmul wrote: If I use the following code in my html and the page then get the following error: Html template: 82 tr 83 thspan jwcid=@FieldLabel field=ognl:components.inputUserActiveDate Active Date/span/th 84 th Active Date/th 85tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td 86 /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker static-binding name=displayName value=Active Date / binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Error from Tapestry: Display name not specified and not provided by field UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate. binding: ExpressionBinding[UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate cachedValue=org.apache.tapestry.form. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/inputUserActiveDate]] component: org.apache.tapestry.valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/$FieldLabel$4] location: context:/WEB-INF/UserMaint.html, line 83 If I use the following code then I don’t get any error and the UserMaint page displays ok but when I submit the form then get null for the nputUserActiveDate. It seems binding not done properly. Html template: tr th Active Date/th tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Please help. Naz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T3 binding issue for DatePicker
I want to use DatePicker to capture date from user. And would like to make this field mandatory. How do I do this? -Original Message- From: Nick Westgate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 18 June 2007 4:01 p.m. To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: T3 binding issue for DatePicker Hi Naz. You're getting confused between DatePicker and DateField. Cheers, Nick. Nazmul wrote: If I use the following code in my html and the page then get the following error: Html template: 82 tr 83 thspan jwcid=@FieldLabel field=ognl:components.inputUserActiveDate Active Date/span/th 84 th Active Date/th 85tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td 86 /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker static-binding name=displayName value=Active Date / binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Error from Tapestry: Display name not specified and not provided by field UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate. binding: ExpressionBinding[UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate cachedValue=org.apache.tapestry.form. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/inputUserActiveDate]] component: org.apache.tapestry.valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/$FieldLabel$4] location: context:/WEB-INF/UserMaint.html, line 83 If I use the following code then I don't get any error and the UserMaint page displays ok but when I submit the form then get null for the nputUserActiveDate. It seems binding not done properly. Html template: tr th Active Date/th tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Please help. Naz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T3 binding issue for DatePicker
Look on Tassel which has various validating components that you can use or study: http://www.tapestrycomponents.org/Tassel/app?service=direct/1/Browse/changeViewsp=SForm-element+%28validating%29 In fact one of them purports to be a ValidDatePicker. Depsite being marked as GPL, no GPL license statement appears to be included. Cheers, Nick. Bhuiyan, Nazmul wrote: I want to use DatePicker to capture date from user. And would like to make this field mandatory. How do I do this? -Original Message- From: Nick Westgate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 18 June 2007 4:01 p.m. To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: T3 binding issue for DatePicker Hi Naz. You're getting confused between DatePicker and DateField. Cheers, Nick. Nazmul wrote: If I use the following code in my html and the page then get the following error: Html template: 82 tr 83 thspan jwcid=@FieldLabel field=ognl:components.inputUserActiveDate Active Date/span/th 84 th Active Date/th 85tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td 86 /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker static-binding name=displayName value=Active Date / binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Error from Tapestry: Display name not specified and not provided by field UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate. binding: ExpressionBinding[UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate cachedValue=org.apache.tapestry.form. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/inputUserActiveDate]] component: org.apache.tapestry.valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/$FieldLabel$4] location: context:/WEB-INF/UserMaint.html, line 83 If I use the following code then I don't get any error and the UserMaint page displays ok but when I submit the form then get null for the nputUserActiveDate. It seems binding not done properly. Html template: tr th Active Date/th tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Please help. Naz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T3 binding issue for DatePicker
Hi Nick, I'm new in Tapestry. There is no usages doc with the component. Can you please provide me some sample code? Thanks a lot. Naz -Original Message- From: Nick Westgate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 18 June 2007 4:34 p.m. To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: T3 binding issue for DatePicker Look on Tassel which has various validating components that you can use or study: http://www.tapestrycomponents.org/Tassel/app?service=direct/1/Browse/cha ngeViewsp=SForm-element+%28validating%29 In fact one of them purports to be a ValidDatePicker. Depsite being marked as GPL, no GPL license statement appears to be included. Cheers, Nick. Bhuiyan, Nazmul wrote: I want to use DatePicker to capture date from user. And would like to make this field mandatory. How do I do this? -Original Message- From: Nick Westgate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 18 June 2007 4:01 p.m. To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: T3 binding issue for DatePicker Hi Naz. You're getting confused between DatePicker and DateField. Cheers, Nick. Nazmul wrote: If I use the following code in my html and the page then get the following error: Html template: 82 tr 83 thspan jwcid=@FieldLabel field=ognl:components.inputUserActiveDate Active Date/span/th 84 th Active Date/th 85tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td 86 /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker static-binding name=displayName value=Active Date / binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Error from Tapestry: Display name not specified and not provided by field UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate. binding: ExpressionBinding[UserMaint/inputUserActiveDate cachedValue=org.apache.tapestry.form. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/inputUserActiveDate]] component: org.apache.tapestry.valid. [EMAIL PROTECTED]/$FieldLabel$4] location: context:/WEB-INF/UserMaint.html, line 83 If I use the following code then I don't get any error and the UserMaint page displays ok but when I submit the form then get null for the nputUserActiveDate. It seems binding not done properly. Html template: tr th Active Date/th tdinput jwcid=inputUserActiveDate size=10 //td /tr Page specification: component id=inputUserActiveDate type=DatePicker binding name=validator expression=beans.required/ binding name=value expression=user.usrActiveDate/ /component Please help. Naz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
